<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>SPEAKER RETRIEVAL FOR TV SHOW VIDEOS BY ASSOCIATING AUDIO SPEAKER RECOGNITION RESULT TO VISUAL FACES Yina Han*', Joseph Razik', Gerard Chollet', and Guizhong Liu*</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Xi'an</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="CN">China '</country>
          <institution>CNRS-LTCI, TELECOM-ParisTech</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Paris</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="FR">France</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Person retrieval based on solely visual face recognition is hard because of the well known problems of illumination, pose, size and expression variation, which can exceed those due to identity. Fortunately, videos often accompanied with other modalities, like audio, text, etc. In this paper, we propose a framework to associate who and when information provided by speaker recognition result to the present faces in the frame sequence for retrieving speakers in TV show videos. First shot segmentation and clustering is carried out. Then face detection and tracking is followed to further locate the faces spacially. Finally, given the identity and time information by speaker recognition result, we point out three ambiguities to be resolved and propose their corresponding solutions.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>The goal of this work is to retrieve speakers in TV show
programs using their names as the query. One approach to this
problem is to use face recognition, which is a long standing
and well studied problem [1]. However, as has been noted
by previous authors [1], most of the face recognition methods
are evaluated only in controlled environments and for
relatively limited sets of faces and poses. For more realistic data
sets, such as TV show programs, face recognition is extremely
challenging visually as speakers exhibit significant variation
in their imaged appearance due to changes in scale, pose,
expressions, partial occlusion etc.</p>
      <p>Since image/video data are often accompanied not only
with images, but also with audio, captions, speech etc, it has
been shown that use of multi-modality allows better retrieval
and analysis recently. As in [1, 2] , combining the
accompanied names from the caption and faces from the images
allows better retrieval performances without requiring
recognition, since the face recognition problem is simplified and
transformed into the problem of finding associations between
names and faces [1]. Speaker recognition from audio can give
us similar cues like accompanied caption in [1, 2] by
providing who and when speaks information.</p>
      <p>THIS WORK IS SUPPORTED BY K-SPACE AND INFOMAGIC
PROJECT.</p>
      <p>In this paper, based on the assumption that precise speaker
recognition is available, we explore how to associate this
result to faces present in TV show videos for speaker retrieval.
Since audio speaker recognition results record who and when
speaks, it appears to be considerably simpler to find
associations between names and faces than it is to identify the face.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW</title>
      <p>Our framework is mainly composed of two parts: visual
processing part that focuses on clustering the same person with
different occurrences together and locate their faces spacially
[3]; and identity association part which focuses on
resolving the ambiguities between present faces and who and when
speaks information.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2.1. Shot layer processing</title>
      <p>Based on the idea that the TV show program we focused
on exhibits limited and compact view types for each main
speaker, as in our previous work [3], shot segmentation and
clustering is conducted first. A typical TV show program
contains around hundreds of segmented shots, but these arise
from just dozens of different ”clusters” for different main
speakers. Discovering the correspondence between shot segments
reduces the volume of data to be processed, avoids the
complex facial feature based inter shot person matching, and
allows stronger appearance models to be built for each speaker.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>2.2. Face detection</title>
      <p>The output of the shot processing stage gives a coarse
segmentation of speakers in frame layer. To further localize their
faces presented in each frame, face detection is employed.
Multi-view face detectors are now available. In order to give
much greater reliability, an OpenCV implementation of the
method of Viola and Jones [4] for frontal face detector is run
on every frame, and to achieve a low false positive rate, a
conservative threshold on detection confidence is used, as in
[5, 6].The use of frontal face detector restricts the video
content we can label to frontal faces [6], and there may be drop
Fig. 1. Examples of speaker ambiguity. (a) Four faces are
detected but only one person is speaking. (b) A ’reaction shot’
- the speaker is not visible in the frame. (b) Also can be seen
as a ’silence shot’ for the person to be retrieved.
outs as the person turns towards profile and back to frontal.
Hence face tracking is adopted as our solution.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>2.3. Face tracking</title>
      <p>
        For each shot, mean shift color tracker is applied. The mean
shift algorithm has achieved considerable success in object
tracking due to its simplicity and robustness. It finds local
minima of a similarity measure between the color histograms
or kernel density estimates of the model and target image [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">7</xref>
        ].
This simple tracking procedure is extremely robust and the
faces can be located with high reliability in each frame despite
variation in pose, lighting, and facial expression.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>2.4. Association of who and when to faces</title>
      <p>Since a speaker is likely to appear when he/she is speaking, a
certain speaker segment in audio domain can be used to limit
the search space for retrieving him visually. However, we are
still faced with three problems of ambiguity: (i) there might
be several faces present in the frame and we do not know
which one is the speaker; (ii) the actual present person might
be not the speaker since this frame is just part of a ’reaction
shot’, (iii) the speaker to be retrieved might be present at some
frames where they did not speak anything, hence there is no
corresponding who and when information available. These
are illustrated in Figure1. How to solve the ambiguities and
retrieval all the appearances of the specific person is our next
step. This includes three key technical points to be resolved:</p>
      <p>First, how to identify the speaker from the several detected
faces present in the same frame. This can be achieved by
finding face detections with significant lip motion as suggested in
[6].</p>
      <p>Second, how to set reasonable association between
speakers indicated in the audio speaker recognition results to the
shots really contain a speaker, namely to the shot which is not
a reaction one. Since a speaker shot is likely to frequently
appear when he/she is speaking, the duration information for
each shot within a specific speaker segment is an important
cue.</p>
      <p>Third, how to set shot layer visual representation for each
speaker so as to retrieve his/her ’silent’ appearance. Visual
similarity matching between determined faces and
undetermined ones based on either global face features, like
eigenface, or local facial feature exemplars, like SIFT [5, 6], need
furhter study.
In this paper we propose a framework for speaker retrieval
based on both audio speaker recognition results and visual
information. Our goal is more restricted than general face
recognition in that we need only set association for faces present
in the video to their names provided by audio speaker
recognition results. Hence it is a method to increase the retrieval
performance of person queries in TV show videos where a
precise audio speaker recognition result was provided in
advance and where traditional face recognition systems cannot
be used. It does not require a training step for a specific
person and therefore, there is no limit on the number of people
queried.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>4. REFERENCES</title>
      <p>[1] D. Ozkan and P. Duyqulu, “A graph based approach for
naming faces in news photos,” in Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2006, pp. 1477–1482.
[3] Y. Han, G. Liu, G. Chollet, and J. Razik, “Person
identity clustering in tv show videos,” in Accepted by Visual
Information Engineering (VIE), 2008.
[4] P. Viola and M. Jones, “Robust real-time face detection,”
International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 52, no. 2,
pp. 137–154, 2004.
[5] J. Sivic, M. Everingham, and A. Zisserman, “Person
spotting: video shot retrieval for face sets,” in International
Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR), 2005,
pp. 226–236.
[6] M. Everingham, J. Sivic, and A. Zisserman, “”hello!
my name isbuffy”- automatic naming of characters in tv
video,” in Proceedings of British Machine Vision
Conference (BMVC), 2006.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Duraiswami</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Efficient meanshift tracking via a new similarity measure,” in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR</article-title>
          ),
          <year>2005</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>176</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>183</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>