<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>DYNAMIC TERM WEIGHTING FOR PERSONAL PHOTO RETRIEVAL Yi Chen</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Centre for Digital Video Processing, Dublin City University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Dublin 9</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IE">Ireland</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>1 Personal photo retrieval is different from many search tasks in that all the targets are either known to the user, or they are about something the owner has seen. For this reason, generating queries for searching personal photos will more likely rely on an individual's memory. In a pilot study of Personal file re-finding, the results suggested a change of retrieval efficiency over time for different types of queries due to recall reliability. While auto-annotating of the photos with contextual information, we are seeking to develop a query weighting strategy, which takes the recall reliability into account, and give feedback to the user based on the searching queries to improve the searching efficiency. This work is supervised by Dr. Gareth J.F. Jones and funded by grant CMS023 under the Science Foundation Ireland Research Frontiers Programme 2006.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>
        The prevalence of digital cameras (including camera mobile
phones) and advances in storage devices, while enabling the
recording of every memorable moment in our lives, is
leading to huge amount of personal digital image data,
which can be difficult for searching. Although techniques of
content based retrieval for static images are becoming
increasingly sophisticated, they may not suffice the needs of
efficient retrieval in such large collections, due to the varied
image quality and severe redundancy of content, and most
importantly, that people do not always remember what the
exact contents are, even of photos taken by themselves [1].
One possible solution is to do information retrieval (IR)
basing on the photos’ metadata (e.g. annotations) which the
user can remember. The reason is that searching for personal
photos can rather be viewed as information re-finding, as
opposed to general information seeking in an unknown
collection, like the World Wide Web. It largely depends on
the individual’s memory about the photos. For example,
while we are looking for certain photos, we usually have
some recollection of the occasion in which they were taken.
In cases where no assistant retrieval tool is provided, we
must reply on browsing the corresponding folders to find the
required photos if the folders are labelled with time, location
or event name, etc. This suggests that people may often have
better memory about contextual information related to
events than the details of the photos. Thus, we assume that if
the photos are also annotated with contextual information
that people remember well, the IR may be more efficient. In
fact, some standard forms of context data are already been
integrated into Personal Retrieval Systems, such as
MediAssist [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">2</xref>
        ]. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">3</xref>
        ] suggested that well remembered features
include location (indoor/outdoor), season, year, people,
weather, etc., but not the textual information in the photos.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. PILOT STUDIES</title>
      <p>
        In our previous pilot studies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">4,5</xref>
        ], the participant recorded
all her computer activities as well as corresponding
contextual information such as her personal location, for a
two month period, and indexed them with the Lucene search
engine[6]. She generated 30 scenarios of information
refinding from her past two month’s experiences. Queries of
content only and content with all possible combinations of
context were tested right after her data collecting period and
six month later, in which her correctly recalled information
were used. Both results (right after data collecting and six
months later) suggested that the combination of correctly
recalled context information improves searching efficiency,
and the advantage was greater six months later. The recall
results showed that she had better memory about perceptual
information such as location, period of the day (e.g.
morning, evening), weather etc., but not the textual
(conceptual) information such as the hour or day. Also, her
recalled contents are significantly less effective in searching,
as evaluated by Lucene [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ]. The drop of content-based query
searching efficiency implies that the key content the user
recalls may differ over time.
      </p>
      <p>We assume that if the document can be annotated with
what the user remembers at the time of searching, the
retrieval effectiveness can be maintained. We aim to develop
an algorithm, which can continuously update the status of
the metadata, so that when the recalled metadata is entered
as query, it can be weighted dynamically according to the
estimated recall reliability as well as other traditional IR
methods. Above all, annotations are required for all the
photos to apply the algorithm.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. DATA COLLECTION</title>
      <p>
        Manual annotation of large volumes of photos is unrealistic.
Thus, we need to do this automatically by capturing context
information which can be synchronized with the photos. For
example:
1) Time and Date can automatically be embedded into the
photos when they were created.
2) Location can be recorded by GPS devices.
3) Weather and light status can be determined by combining
time and location information at the time of creation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">2</xref>
        ].
4) Emotional status can be roughly interpreted from
wearable biometric sensors such as heart rate monitor and
the BodyMedia SenseWear armband.
5) Bluetooth tracking devices allow for the detection of
other nearby Bluetooth devices. Thus it enables the
recording of objects or people with Bluetooth devices (such
as Mobile phones) at the time of photo taking.
6) Content tagging may mainly rely on third part content
analysis technologies such as face detection.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. DYNAMIC WEIGHTING SYSTEM</title>
      <p>We propose to develop a dynamic weighting system,
structuring the data partly based on a memory model, so that
the recall reliability can be evaluated, with feedback to the
user to generate more efficient queries.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>4.1. Structuring and Weighting</title>
      <p>Information processing theories have argued that the human
memory exists in Associated Networks, that nodes of
remembered information are linked to each other so that
they can be retrieved tracing from the links [7]. In our
model, we propose to create links from attributes to items
and links between attributes or same level items. We assume
that the same level links are usually created based on time
proximity (belonging to the same events), but which types of
attributes tends to link with each other is yet to be explored.</p>
      <p>Instead of weighting independent nodes like the Page
rank algorithm does, this model weights the links’ strength,
which estimate the likelihood of information on one end
being retrieved if cued with the other end. Based on memory
and learning theories, we propose to integrated several
factors into an algorithm, such as time lapse from the last
time the two nodes were associated, frequency of occurrence
of the link, and encoding quality calculated from various
factors [7]. The links’ weight automatically updates (e.g.
when triggered by encoding of new items).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>4.3. Feedback Mechanism for Photo Searching System</title>
      <p>The retrieval system is based on the above structure,
inheriting traditional IR strategies, and implemented with a
query evaluation and feedback mechanism.
Simple semantic processing will be applied to the entered
queries, mainly expanding query words to arrays of
synonyms from the database. The Query evaluation step will
estimate the reliability of recalled query features based on
the memory model. In the first stage of our system
developing, the searching interface will allow the users to
judge the reliability of their recall for each query (very sure,
guessed, etc.). This will also combined with traditional IR
methods to provide feedbacks to the user about the queries’
efficiency as well as potential possible queries or
combination of queries based on the links, and leave the
final decision to the user to refine their queries.</p>
      <p>The above proposed system still needs a series of user
studies which will be based on our on going data collection.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>6. REFERENCES</title>
      <p>[1] Sellen, A. J., Fogg, A “Do life-logging technologies support
memory for the past?: an experimental study using sensecam.” In
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in
Computing Systems. CHI '07, ACM, New York, 2007, pp. 81-90.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. O</given-names>
            <surname>'Hare</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>H.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Lee et</article-title>
          . al, “
          <article-title>MediAssist: Using Content-Based Analysis</article-title>
          and Context to Manage Personal Photo Collections,” in CIVR2006,
          <year>2006</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>529</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>532</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Naaman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et. al.
          <year>2004</year>
          .
          <article-title>Context data in geo-referenced digital photo collections</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM international Conference on Multimedia</source>
          . New York, NY,
          <fpage>196</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>203</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fuller</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kelly</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jones</surname>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          “
          <article-title>Applying Contextual Memory Cues for Retrieval from Personal Information Archives</article-title>
          .
          <source>” PIM 2008 - Proceedings of Personal Information Management, Workshop at CHI</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          ,
          <year>2008</year>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kelly</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            <given-names>Y</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fuller</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jones</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </string-name>
          “
          <article-title>A Study of Remembered Context for Information Access from Personal Digital Archives”</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of IIiX2008</source>
          , London,
          <year>2008</year>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gospodnetic</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Otis . “Lucene in Action”.
          <source>Manning Publications</source>
          .
          <year>2004</year>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jesse</surname>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Purdy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          r. M.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bennett</surname>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schwartz</surname>
          </string-name>
          , William C Gordon (
          <year>2001</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Learning and Memory</article-title>
          . California : Wadsworth, Belmont
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>