<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Model to formation data base of secondary parameters for assessing status of the state secret protection⋆</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yurii Dreis</string-name>
          <email>dreisyuri@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Oleksandr Korchenko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Volodymyr Sokolov</string-name>
          <email>v.sokolov@kubg.edu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Pavlo Skladannyi</string-name>
          <email>p.skladannyi@kubg.edu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>18/2 Bulvarno-Kudriavska str., 04053 Kyiv</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>CSDP-2024: Cyber Security and Data Protection</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Mariupol State University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>6 Preobrazhenska str., 10008 Kyiv</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>State University of Information and Telecommunication Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>7 Solomyanska str., 03058 Kyiv</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>University of the National Education Commission</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>2 Podchorążych ul., 30084 Krakow</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="PL">Poland</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Protection of classified information, especially state secrets, is an important task in the field of national and information security of the state. To minimize possible damage to the national security of Ukraine from violations in the field of state secret protection and to reduce the negative international rating and other serious consequences at the state level, the task of creating specialized databases, developing and improving existing methods and models that implement relevant assessments is urgent. That is why the theoreticalmultiple presentation of the parameters of the “Report on the State of Protection of State Secrets” in tuple models allows solving the actual scientific and practical task of formalizing the process of assessing the negative consequences of leaking a state secret, its disclosure or loss of Material Carriers of Secret Information (MCSI), violation of the secrecy regime and state of ensuring the protection of country's secrets in general. Previously, a tuple model of primary and internal parameters was developed, and now, as its completion, a model of secondary parameters and its hierarchical structure has already been proposed, due to the integrated theoretic-multiple representation of sets characterizing information: the implementation or ordering (scientific and/or scientific and technical support) of secret research, development, design and other scientific works, manufacture of secret products, regime premises, objects of information activity, international cooperation, etc., allows to determine sets of input and output parameters for the formation of special databases and formalization of the process of damage assessment caused to national security by violations of state secret protection mechanisms. In the future, to implement the above-mentioned process, it is necessary to develop a method of assessing the state of protection of the country's secrets both separately for the subject of regime-secret activity (reporting entity) and for the organization (institution) to which the reporting entities are directly subordinated.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;limited access information protection</kwd>
        <kwd>state secrets protection</kwd>
        <kwd>parameter model1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        From 2014 to the present, the number of security breaches
as a result of treason and/or sabotage, in terms of loss,
disclosure, or transfer of information including information
with limited access, especially State Secrets (SS), is increased
significantly both in the world [1, 2], as well as in Ukraine
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">3</xref>
        ]. This process became more active after the occupation of
certain territories of Ukraine (Donetsk and Luhansk
regions, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea). As a result,
to strengthen national security in the sphere of State Secret
Protection (SSP), the NSDC decisions “On additional
measures to strengthen the national security of Ukraine”
and “On the state of overcoming negative consequences
caused by the loss of material carriers of secret information
in the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine, in the area
of the anti-terrorist operation in the Donetsk and Luhansk
regions” were taken. To improve reporting on the state of
protection of SS and by the requirements of the law [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">4</xref>
        ], the
appropriate forms of reports on the status of SS protection
(hereinafter—Report) and instructions on the procedure for
their execution and submission [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ] were approved and
updated.
      </p>
      <p>
        The report was supplemented with dynamically
changing sets of identifying and evaluation parameters for
determining the state of the provision of SSP, presented in
separate sections of this report. The specified update makes
certain corrections and additions to the already developed
model for assessing the consequences of the leaks of state
secrets from cyber attacks on the critical information
infrastructure of the country [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">6</xref>
        ]. There is also a need for
further improvement of methods and models for evaluating
damage to the national security of Ukraine in the event of
an SS leak [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11 ref6 ref7 ref8 ref9">7–12</xref>
        ], taking into account the use of a
theoretical-multiple approach [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">13</xref>
        ], and the development of
a method for assessing the state of ensuring the SSP of a
0000-0003-2699-1597 (Y. Dreis); 0000-0003-3376-0631 (O. Korchenko);
0000-0002-9349-7946 (V. Sokolov); 0000-0002-7775-6039 (P. Skladannyi)
© 2024 Copyright for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under
Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
reporting entity as a Subject of Regime-Secret Activity
(SRSA), (for example, a Critical Infrastructure Object (CIO),
in the event of classified information leaks. To implement
such a method, models for forming a database of a section
of the parameters (primary [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">14</xref>
        ], internal [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">15</xref>
        ]) for
evaluating the state of provision of SSP for SRSA at CIO
were developed.
2. Formulation of the problem
To minimize the consequences of possible damage to the
national security of Ukraine from breaches in the field of
SSP and to reduce the negative rating at the state level, it is
necessary to create databases, methods, and models that
implement appropriate assessments. Therefore, the
theoretical-multiple presentation of the parameters of the
Report defined by its separate sections, which contain
information about [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ] the reporting entity, its subordination
and departmental affiliation; financing of SSP activities;
personnel of the reporting entity having permission and
access to SS; the number of material carriers of classified
information; implementation and ordering (scientific and/or
scientific and technical support) of secret research,
development, design, and other scientific works,
manufacturing of secret products; regime premises, objects
of information activity; facts of losses of MCCI or disclosure
of information constituting a state secret, as well as
classified information about foreign states, international
organizations and international cooperation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15 ref16 ref17">16–18</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Therefore, the generalization and presentation of these
parameters by a tuple model is an urgent scientific goal,
which allows solving the scientific and practical tasks of
forming a database of parameters of the state of SSP
provision for creating a method of processing input data
(identification, static and other sets) and formalizing the
process of assessing the state of SSP at CIS from the negative
consequences of a SS leak or caused by the loss of MCSI or
its disclosure.</p>
      <p>In this regard, the purpose of this work is to develop a
model for the formation of a database of secondary
parameters, which, due to the theoretical multiple
representations of parameters as identification, static, and
other sets of input data, allows to assess the state of provision
of SSP for SRSA at OCI in the event of negative consequences
(damages) caused by the leak of SS, its disclosure or loss of
the MCCI, breach of the secrecy regime, etc.
3. Completion of model</p>
      <p>
        development
We will use the set of all possible identifiers of IS
(Information about the Subject) tuples, which can be used to
display information about SRSA and use it in the process of
detecting and assessing the consequences in case of loss of
SS [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18 ref19">19, 20</xref>
        ]:
=
= {
, 
, … , 
},
(1)
where  ⊆  ( = 1,  ) is the identifier of the tuple
of parameters characterizing the φth SRSA.
      </p>
      <p>
        For example, at  = 4 (1) will have the form [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">15</xref>
        ]:
      </p>
      <p>І ,
where  =  ,  =  ,  =  ,  =  І
is respectively, the identifiers of the tuples of the SRSAs
National Aviation University (NAU), Zhytomyr Military
Institute named after S. P. Koroliov (ZMI), National
Academy of the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU), Sumsk
Investigator’s Isolator (SIІ).</p>
      <p>For the φth SRSA, the tuple of parameters that
characterizes it has the following form:
, 
, … , 
, … , 
〉,
(2)
where  ⊆  ( = 1,  ) is the component of the
tuple, which is a sub-tuple, maps the ith identifier to the φth
SRSA parameter, and k is the maximum number of such
parameters. Significantly, all members  are characterized
by order property.</p>
      <p>
        For example, according to the Generalized Report and
the Report [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ] at  = 9 the tuple (2) we define as:
= 〈
, 
, … , 
〉,
where, for example, subtuple  is section 1
(“Information about SRSA, it is subordination and
departmental affiliation”), and other components are
indicated in Table 1.
      </p>
      <p>
        Let’s divide the components   of Table 1 by types of
parameters primary, internal, and secondary. The first
group of (primary) and the second group of (internal)
parameters are discussed in detail in scientific papers
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref14">14, 15</xref>
        ], and therefore we will describe the following third
group of secondary parameters   . .   to complete the
development of a model for the formation of a database of
parameters for evaluating the state of provision of SSP.
Section II
Section III
Section IV
Section V
Section V(A)
Section VI
Section VII
Section VIII
Section I
Section II
      </p>
      <p>
        Information about the reporting entity, its subordination, and departmental
affiliation
Information about RSO, financing of activities for SSP
Information on whether employees of the reporting entity have permission
and access to state secrets
Information on the number of material carriers of classified information (MCCI)
Information on the implementation (scientific and/or scientific and technical
support) of secret research, development, design, and other scientific works,
the manufacture of secret products
Information regarding the orders (scientific and/or scientific and technical
support) of secret research, development, design, and other scientific works,
the manufacture of secret products
Information about regime premises, objects of information activity
Information about the facts of losses of the MCCI or the disclosure of
information constituting a state secret, as well as information with limited
access to foreign states or international organizations
Information about international cooperation
Information about the reporting entity, its subordination, and departmental
affiliation
Information about RSO, financing of activities for SSP
The fifth component of the sub-tuple 
is Section 5
(“Information on the implementation (scientific and/or
scientific and technical support) of secret research,
development, design, and other scientific works, the
manufacture of secret products”) is filled in by the SRSA
(institutions) that are contractors of works and products as
of the end of the reporting period by filling in the
appropriate columns (parameters):
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref14 ref18 ref19 ref4">5, 14, 15, 19, 20</xref>
        ]:
where 
⊆ 
( = 1, ℎ ) is the ith valid name and
names (for example, at  = 1, 
= ℎ , ℎ = 1) then(4)
conditional name of φth SRSA, and ℎ is the number of these
acquires the form [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">14</xref>
        ]:

=
= 
. = 
. = 
. = 
where 
⊆
      </p>
      <p>( = 1,  ) is ith identifier of the
number of secrecy classifications, and  is their quantity.</p>
      <p>
        According to the Law of Ukraine “On State Secrets” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">4</xref>
        ]
and taking into account [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ] the MCSI and the information
constituting state secrets have such secrecy classifications
      </p>
      <p>= 〈
. = 
of the number of total works (the sum of graphs 6–13), and
 is their number according to  , that is, according to a
form:
therefore, works in total at the NAU by secrecy
classification: “secret”—30, “top secret”—15:
where 
. ⊆ 
specific secrecy classification (for example, at  = 1 for
= 1 ( = 1), then (6) will acquire the
. = 
=
= 
. , … , … , … , 
. , … , … , … ,</p>
      <p>,
and  is their quantity for  , that is, according to the actual
classification of secrecy (for example, at  = 1 for 
=
= 1 ( = 1), then (7) will acquire the form:
i.e. the NAU performs the works, including the state
defense order, with the secrecy classification “secret”—30,
“top secret”—15).
, 
. = 
=
= 
. , … , … , … , 
. , … , … , … ,</p>
      <p>,
=</p>
      <p>, 
=</p>
      <p>, 
.</p>
      <p>
        , 
2) “top secret”: completed in the reporting period—5;
classification:
terminated in the reporting period—2; which were not
1) “secret”: completed in the reporting period—10;
performed in the reporting period—2; the implementation of
terminated in the reporting period—2; which were not
which at the end of the reporting period continues—1).
=
=

.
.
. = 
=

. = 
=
,
where 
according to the specific ith secrecy classification (for example,
taking into account [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ], at  = 1 for 
(8)
(9)
.
      </p>
      <p>
        , 
=
1) “secret”: completed in the reporting period—5;
terminated in the reporting period—2; which was not
which continues as of the end of the reporting period—1.
performed in the reporting period—2; the execution of
which continues as of the end of the reporting period—1;
( = 1,  ,  = 1,  ) is jth identifier
secrecy classification (for example, considering [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ], at  = 1

=
 .
      </p>
      <p>=  . , … , … , … ,  . , … , … , … ,</p>
      <p>,
of the number of components of secret SRW, RDW, design, and
other scientific works with the secrecy classification, аnd 
is
their number for each  , that is, according to the specific ith
for 
, 
.</p>
      <p>= {“10”}, {“5”} .
the total number of products (the sum of graphs 16–21), and
y7 is their number (for example, taking into account the</p>
      <p>Therefore, at the NAU products in total with the secrecy
classification “secret”—10, “top secret”—5.</p>
      <p>=
 .</p>
      <p>=
, 
=
 .</p>
      <p>= 
. , … , … , … , 
. , … , … , … ,</p>
      <p>,
(10)
(11)
of the number of products, including the state defense order,
is their number for  , that is, according to the
form:</p>
      <p>Therefore, at the NAU the number of products,
including products by state defense ordering with secrecy
classification: “secret”—10, “top secret”—5).</p>
      <p>
        where 
of the number of secret products, аnd  is their number for
each  , that is, according to the specific ith secrecy
classification (for example considering [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">10</xref>
        ], at  = 1 for 
=
=
= 
. , … , … , … , 
. , … , … , … , 
(12)
=
      </p>
      <p>, 
.</p>
      <p>, 
, , 
. , 
. ,</p>
      <p>= {“4”, “1”, “1”}, {“1”, “1”, “1”} ,
=
1) “secret”: manufactured in the reporting period—4;
secrecy classification:
which were not produced in the reporting period—1; the
.
.


production of which continues as of the end of the reporting
production of which continues as of the end of the reporting
period—1;</p>
      <p>2) “top secret”: produced in the reporting period—1;
.
specific ith secrecy classification (for example, considering
.</p>
      <p>=
i.e. at the NAU the number of components of secret
of works and products as of the end of the reporting period
= 〈
. , 
(institution) is the customer and not the contractor of works</p>
      <p>Then filling in the parameters of the subtuple 
identical to the parameters of the subtuple 
as 
= 
∉</p>
      <p>and there is only the presence of
according to formula (3), that is, SRSA
(institution) is the contractor, not the customer of works and</p>
      <p>The Seventh Component of the Subtitle 
Section VI (“Information about Premises, Objects of
Information</p>
      <p>Activity”) is completed by the SRSA
(institution) as of the end of the reporting period by filling
in the corresponding columns (parameters):
is
is
(14)
=</p>
      <p>1) “secret”: manufactured in the reporting period—2;
which were not manufactured in the reporting period—1;
the manufacture of which as of the end of the reporting
period continues—1;</p>
      <p>2) “top secret”: manufactured in the reporting period—
1; which were not manufactured in the reporting period—0;
the manufacture of which continued at the end of the
reporting period—1.</p>
      <p>The sixth component of the subtuple 
is Section
V (a) (“Information about ordering (scientific and/or
scientific and technical support) of secret scientific
research, research and development, design and other
scientific works, production of secret products”) is
completed by the SRSA (institutions) that are the customers
use SRSA</p>
      <p>=</p>
      <p>For example, to assign specific values to the following
five parameters of the seventh component 
⊆</p>
      <p>
        let us
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref14 ref18 ref19 ref4">5, 14, 15, 19, 20</xref>
        ]:
. = 
conditional (if available) name of the reporting entity”.
and telecommunication systems suitable for the circulation of
where  . =  ( = 1,  ,  = 1,  ) is jth
identifier of the number of regime premises, and  is their
number for each  , that is, according to a specific ith secrecy
classification (for example, taking into account [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">10</xref>
        ], at  =
1 for  = 2 ( = 1,2),  = 2 ( = 1,2) then (15) will be as
follows:

=
.
      </p>
      <p>= 
. , 
. = 
=
= 
. , … , … , … , 
. , … , … , … ,</p>
      <p>,
i.e. at the NAU, the number of regime premises with the
secrecy classification:</p>
      <p>1) “secret”: intended for the storage of MCCI during
non-working hours—1; other regime premises—2;
2) “top secret”: designated for storage of MCCI during
non-working hours—1; other regime premises—1.</p>
      <p>where  . =  ( = 1,  ,  = 1,  ) is іth
identifier of the number of certified objects of information
activity, suitable for the circulation of linguistic secret
information, and  is their number for  , that is, according
to a specific ith secrecy classification (for example, taking
into account at  = 1 for  = 2 ( = 1,2),  = 1 ( = 1)
then (16) will acquire the form:
.</p>
      <p>= 
.
.

=
. , 
. , 
. , 
i.e. at the NAU the number of certified objects of
information activity suitable for the circulation of linguistic
secret information by secrecy classification: “secret”—1,
“top secret”—1.</p>
      <p>
        ,
where  . =  ( = 1,  ,  = 1,  ) is jth
identifier of the number of certified information and
telecommunication systems, suitable for circulation of
secret information, and  is their number for each  , that
is, by a specific ith secrecy classification (for example, taking
into account [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ], at  = 1 for  = 2 ( = 1,2),  = 4 ( =
1,4) then (17) will be as follows:
i. e. at the NAU the number of certified information,
telecommunication, and information-telecommunication
systems, suitable for the circulation of secret information
with the secrecy classification:
      </p>
      <p>1) “secret”: local computing networks—1; PCs (including
local computing networks)—2; other information,
telecommunication, information-telecommunication
systems—1; the number of subscriber installations of
longdistance/city government communications—1;</p>
      <p>2) “top secret”: local computing networks—0; PC (including
local computing networks)—0; other information and
 = 〈
telecommunication systems—1; number of long-distance/local
government communication subscriber installations—1.</p>
      <p>The eighth component of the subtuple  is
Section VII (“Information on the facts of the losses of
MCCI or the disclosure of state secrets, as well as
information with restricted access of foreign states or
international organizations”) is completed by the SRSA
(institutions) as of the end of the reporting period by filling
in the relevant graphs (parameters):
where  . ⊆  ( = 1,  ) is the component of the
subtuple that displays ith identifier of parameters of φth SRSA
(institution), and w is their quantity.</p>
      <p>
        For example, respectively [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ],  = 4 ( = 1,5) formula
(18) can be represented as follows:
(16)
(17)
(18)
information
with limited
      </p>
      <p>access to foreign states or
international organizations and Losses of its MCCI.</p>
      <p>For example, to assign specific values to the next four
parameters of the eighth component 
⊆</p>
      <p>= {“NAU”}.
, 
, … ,</p>
      <p>,


=
=
,</p>
      <p>= {“0”},
= 
= {“1”}.
, 
, … , 
,
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
i.e. at the NAU the number of facts of disclosure of
information constituting a state secret—0.</p>
      <p>That is the number of losses of MCSI—1.</p>
      <p>RDW, design, and other scientific works with the following
secrecy classifications:</p>
      <p>1) “secret”: completed in the reporting period—5;
terminated in the reporting period—2; which was not
performed in the reporting period—2; the execution of
which continues as of the end of the reporting period—1.</p>
      <p>2) “top secret”: completed in the reporting period—2;
terminated in the reporting period—1; which were not
performed in the reporting period—1; the implementation of
which continues as of the end of the reporting period—1.
“Information
information
about regime</p>
      <p>premises, objects of
activity” is completed
by the</p>
      <p>SRSA
(institution) as of the end of the reporting period by filling
in the corresponding columns (parameters):
where 
⊆</p>
      <p>( = 1,  ) is ith identifier of the
number of facts of disclosure of information constituting a state
secret, and 
is their quantity (for example, at  = 1, 
=
1 ( == 1) then (19) will be as follows:
where 
⊆</p>
      <p>( = 1,  ) is ith identifier of the
number of facts of losses of MCSI, 
= {“0”},
i.e., at the NAU, the number of facts of disclosure of
information</p>
      <p>with limited access to foreign states or
international organizations and losses of its MNI—1.</p>
      <p>The ninth component of subtuple 
is Section VІ,
i.e. the NAU carried out work on components of secret SRW,
= 〈
. = 
conditional (if available) name of the reporting entity”.
delegations of foreign states and international organizations,
as well as by foreigners and stateless persons.
are at the SRSA.
countries and international organizations received.</p>
      <p>is the set Number of Delegations of foreign
is the set Number of Foreign Advisers who</p>
      <p>=</p>
      <p>For example, to assign specific values to the next five
parameters of the ninth component 
⊆ 
. = 
. = 
  . =</p>
      <p>=

=</p>
      <p>=
=
where 
⊆</p>
      <p>( = 1,  ) is ith identifier of the
number of delegations of foreign states and international
organizations received, and 
, … , 
where 
⊆</p>
      <p>( = 1,  ) is ith identifier of the
number of foreign trips, and 
= {“12”},
= {“NAU”}.</p>
      <p>, … , 
, … , 
=
=
, … , 
, 

, 
, 
, 


i.e. the number of delegations of foreign states and
international organizations received at the NAU is 8.</p>
      <p>=</p>
      <p>= {“8”},
= 
number of premises visited by delegations of foreign states and
i.e. at the NAU, the number of premises visited by delegations
international organizations, as well as by foreigners and
of foreign states and international organizations, as well as by
stateless persons, and  is their quantity (for example, at  =
foreigners and stateless persons is 5.
1, 
= 1 ( = 1) then (23) will be as:
= 
= 
= 
= 
,
,
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
that is at the NAU the number of foreign advisers which are
on the SRSA is 0.
i.e. at the NAU the number of foreign trips is 12.</p>
      <p>The general hierarchical structure of the developed
model (taking into account the above examples) is presented
in Fig. 1.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>4. Conclusions</title>
      <p>A tuple model was developed, which, due to the
theoreticalmultiple approach to the formation of sets of tuple models,
provides an integrated representation of the secondary
parameters of the state of provision of SSP in the SRSA,
which characterizes the information on the implementation
of ordering (scientific and/or scientific and technical
support) of secret research, research and development,
design and other scientific works, the manufacture of secret
products, as well as on regime premises, objects of
information activity, international cooperation, etc., allows
determining a set of input and output parameters for the
formation of special databases and the formalization of the
process of assessing the negative consequences (damages)
caused to the national security of Ukraine from violation of
the secrecy regime and the state of provision of SSP.</p>
      <p>
        In the future, to implement the above-mentioned
process, it is necessary to improve the existing methods [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3 ref4 ref5">3–
6</xref>
        ] and develop new ones for evaluating the state of
protection of SS both separately for the SRSA (reporting
entity) and for the organization (institution) to which these
reporting entities are directly subordinated by the
requirements of domestic and international legislation,
especially of NATO and European Union member states.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Cooper</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Boycott-Owen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>What is the Official Secrets Act and who has been guilty of breaking it</article-title>
          ? URL: https://www.independent.co.uk/news Yu.
          <article-title>Onyshchenko, Military (un)secret: what is known about the age of US secret documents (</article-title>
          <year>2023</year>
          ). URL: https://www.eurointegration.com.ua
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>The</given-names>
            <surname>National Council Will Check Several Channels</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Due to the Disclosure of State Secrets (</article-title>
          <year>2022</year>
          ). URL: https://detector.media
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>On</given-names>
            <surname>State</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Secret</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine,
          <source>Law dated 21.01</source>
          .
          <year>1994</year>
          #
          <fpage>3855</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>XII</lpage>
          . URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[5] On the Approval of the Forms of Reports on the State of State Secret Protection and Instructions on the Procedure for Their Registration and Submission</article-title>
          , Security Service of Ukraine, Order #
          <volume>6</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). URL: https://ssu.gov.ua/npb-nakazy
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Korchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>A Model for Assessing the Consequences of the Leakage of State Secrets from Cyber Attacks on the Critical Information Infrastructure of the State, Inf</article-title>
          . Secur.
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <fpage>29</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>35</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Methodical</given-names>
            <surname>Recommendations to State</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Experts on Secrets on Determining the Grounds for Classifying Information as a State Secret and the Degree of Their Secrecy, State Committee of Ukraine for State Secrets</article-title>
          , Collection #
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <year>1998</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Arkhypov</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Estimation of Efficiency of System of Protection of the State Secret</article-title>
          . Monograph,
          <string-name>
            <surname>NASSU</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Arkhypov</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Criteria for Determining the Possible Harm to National Security of Ukraine if Disclosure Information Protected by State</article-title>
          . Monograph,
          <string-name>
            <surname>NASSU</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Korchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Assessment harm to the Ukraine National Security in Case of Leakage State Secrets</article-title>
          . Monograph,
          <string-name>
            <surname>NASSU</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Falchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <source>Method of Fuzzy Classification of Information with Limited Access, 2nd International Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>255</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>259</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/atit50783.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>9349358</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Dreis</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <source>Restricted Information Identification Model</source>
          ,
          <source>in: Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication Systems</source>
          vol.
          <volume>3288</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>89</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>95</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Korchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>A Theoretical-Multiple Approach to Assessing Damage to the National Security of Ukraine in the Event of a Leak of Information Constituting a State Secret</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guidelines</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Korchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Dreis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Tuple Model for Forming a Database of Primary Parameters for Assessing the State Secret Protection Status, Ukrainian</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Sci. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Inf</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Secur.
          <volume>28</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>35</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>42</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .18372/
          <fpage>2225</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>5036</lpage>
          .
          <fpage>28</fpage>
          .16911.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Dreis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Model to Formation Data Base of Internal Parameters for Assessing the Status of the State Secret Protection et al</article-title>
          .,
          <source>in: Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication Systems</source>
          vol.
          <volume>3654</volume>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <fpage>277</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>289</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Anakhov</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Protecting Objects of Critical Information Infrastructure from Wartime Cyber Attacks by Decentralizing the Telecommunications Network</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication Systems</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>3550</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>240</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>245</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Hulak</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Dynamic Model of Guarantee Capacity and Cyber Security Management in the Critical Automated System</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: 2nd International Conference on Conflict Management in Global Information Networks</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>3530</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>102</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>111</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Grechaninov</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <source>Formation of Dependability and Cyber Protection Model in Information Systems of Situational Center, in: Emerging Technology Trends on the Smart Industry and the Internet of Things</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>3149</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>107</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>117</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <article-title>YouControl is a Counterparty Verifi-cation Service, a Catalogue of Court Decisions</article-title>
          . URL: https://youcontrol.com.ua
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>[20] National Aviation University (NAU). URL: http://nau.edu.ua</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>