FAIR Turn in Epigraphy: Low Barrier Pathways to Quantitative and Reproducible Research in Latin Epigraphy

Abstract

The application of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles can revolutionise the epigraphic discipline by facilitating quantitative and reproducible research. Despite the richness of Latin inscriptions, the lack of low-barrier tools for accessing and analysing these datasets has hindered largescale studies and the uptake of FAIR and Open Science principles in ancient studies. ThLeatEpig v2.0 tool addresses this gap by enabling researchers to programmatically accessEtphiegraphic Database Clauss-Slaby, and generate reproducible research following state-of-the-art standards. The main aim of LatEpig is to democratise data access and enhance research potential without requiring advanced technical skills. A case study on 'viator' inscriptions exemplifies the tool's utility, illustrating spatial and temporal trends in inscriptions addressing messengers and travellers across the Roman Empire. LatEpig exemplifies that the development of similar tools is crucial for advancing FAIR and Open Science practices in the Humanities, ensuring that substantial investments in digital resources are fully realised.

Keywords

• eol>Roman Empire
• Latin inscriptions
• quantitative epigraphy
• research software development
• ancient history

1. Introduction

Over the past 40 years, the digitisation and development of thEepigraphic Database ClaussSlaby (EDCS), has made 539,766 Latin inscriptions accessibleonline.1 EDCS represents one of the richest resources to study the development of the Roman Empire (27 BCE - 476 CE in the West / 1453 CE in the East) and its inhabitants. Inscriptions - short messages written on durable materials, range from funerary markers and epitaphs, dedications, public decrees and accounts, milestones and boundary markers, to curse tablets and magic formu8l]a.eT[hey ofer insights into broad phenomena, such as migration and mobilit3y8[, 25], difusion of religious beliefs [ 11 ], economic performance and specialisation40[ , 21 ], commemoration practices3[ , 4, 28 ] but also linguistic variation and social chang2e6[ , 34 ], covering the Mediterranean over several centuries1[ 6 ].

Despite being an invaluable resource for Latin epigraphy, EDCS has significant issues that hinder its full potential for quantitative studie1s6][. Problems such as unclear attribution of individual text editions and uncertain authorship of editorial changes limit the impact of the extensive efort and investment in developing this rich resource9[ , 31, 5 ]. The data in EDCS is findable and accessible for viewing via a simple web interface, which allows searches based on various criteria, such as free text within inscriptions, metadata like date or origin, and preselected keywords related to socio-political status or typology of inscriptions. However, the search results are displayed as ephemeral HTML outputs without options to download or save parameters, makingreuse and replication impossible. Moreover, hidden in the plain sight of the search output, important information, like geographical coordinates and links to other databases, is difÏcult to access and can be achieved through a series of clicks. Manual data extraction is tedious and error-prone, further contributing to the lacikntoefroperability and overall unFAIRness of EDCS1[ 6 ].

In an attempt to solve the known limitations of EDCS, we came up with a low-threshold solution that allows researchers or students of ancient history to access and utilise the EDCS in a reproducible manner and enables large-scale longitudinal studies of Latin epigraphy, while adhering to the standards of FAIR and Open Science3[ 9 ]. While developing an application programming interface (API) would solve the issue for programmers and more advanced users, the majority of researchers and students in ancient history and related fields do not have the necessary skill set or resources to hire IT personnel to query an API. This was demonstrated by the case of LatEpig version 1.0, which was a simple command-line tool, that however proved to be too complex for the target audience. Thus, we decided to create a tool that allows for noviceuser-friendly access to the data, while adhering to the highest standards of Open Science.

The value ofLatEpig as a research tool is evident in the numerous projects that have utilised it since its release in 2021 2[]. Researchers have usedLatEpig to access and process all EDCS inscriptions, enriching them for quantitative studies13[ , 14, 16 ]. Machine-learning classification of inscription types, as conducted by2[0], expanded the dataset intoLatin Inscriptions in Space and Time (LIST, [ 22 ]) and Latin Inscriptions of the Roman Empire (LIRE, [ 23 ]). These authors also addressed biases and temporal uncertainty in epigraphic datas1e6ts].[Other studies leveraged the expanded LIST and LIRE datasets to explore topics such as the popularity of the healing deity Asclepius during the Antonine Plagu1e1[] and the economic specialisation in the Roman Empire [ 21 ]. The Minerva project developedItiner-e: The Gazetteer of Ancient Roads, using milestones to trace Roman roads7][. AdditionallyL,atEpig was employed to train neural networks for reconstructing missing text within inscriptions, opening new avenues for large language models in epigraphy3[0].

As a practical example oLfatEpig’s contribution to the current research agendas, we present a case study of ’viator’ inscriptions - texts placed along Roman roads addressing passers-by, documenting not only the mobility of people but also suggesting the relatively widespread literacy levels. While ’viator’ inscriptions are a well-known phenomenon, their exact extent and historical development remain unexplored. We will demonstrate hLoatwEpig can contribute to the broader understanding of this phenomenon while adhering to FAIR and Open Science principles. We publish all steps in the case studRyscript along with detailed comments and provide interested scholars and students with a step-by-step script, guiding them through a simple analysis of several hundred inscriptions.

2. How to FAIRify Latin inscription in a few clicks

The LatEpig’s main purpose is to alleviate some of the technological and methodological inefifciencies of EDCS and enable reproducible and quantitative research of Latin inscriptions to anyone, without requiring any special programming skills. The novice user can LrautnEpig with a single click in amyBinderJupyter Notebook web interface, with instructions directly available in the Notebook with examples of possible searches. Once users are happy with the parameters and results of their search, they can download them as JSON or TSV files to their computer, with the search metadata written directly to the file name for ease of replication and verification. The downloaded file contains 22 attributes, such as the text of the inscription, dating, place name, latitude and longitude etc. As an addition to EDCS, cleaned text of the inscription is available in three diferent formats, suitable for distant reading methods and NLP. For details, see theLatEpig output metadata descriptio n.

Users wishing to explore the spatial aspect of the results can display the search output on an interactive map (Figures1 and 2), allowing visual inspection of the results along with the system of Roman Provinces and road network. Alternatively, upon zooming in the map they can open a detailed record of individual inscriptions, dynamically populated from the selected search output.

Some users might be interested in publishing the search results on a map without having to export data to a separate GIS software while maintaining the principles of FAIR and Open Science. For this purpose,LatEpig contains a separate (experimental) interface, that allows publishingLatEpig search results as a high-quality map with customisable parameters (BW or colour, DPI values, output file type, add/remove open historical geospatial layers). For better reproducibility and transparency of the research output, the search parameters and other metadata (source, tool used, date, number of results, map parameters) along with their licenses and credits, are printed on the map and to the filename, see Figure3. When creating a map with the results of the custom search, users can select layers to include in the map, such as the boundaries and provinces of the Roman Empire at diferent points in time1[ 7 ], Roman roads [32], and ancient cities [ 12 ].

3. Case study: the ‘viator’ inscriptions

The ‘viator’ inscriptions are part of the broader phenomenon of ‘speaking stones’, inanimate objects that address anonymous passers-by. These epitaphs invite people to read, reflect and commiserate the fate of the deceased 1[] Found in both Latin and Greek during the first four centuries CE, when the Mediterranean region was under Roman control, see Figu3,rethey are often cited as evidence of high literacy, as random travellers were expected to read them while pausing their travels. Typically located on funerary inscriptions along roads leading to settlements [ 27 ], ‘viator’ inscriptions are considered widespread, yet there is a significant lack of quantitative studies ofering a comprehensive view of their distribution and extent of the phenomenon.

According to Lewis and Short’s classical dictionary, the novuinator, oris, m. has two meanings: broadly, a ‘wayfarer’ or ‘traveller’, and more narrowly, an ‘apparitor’, an ofÏcer who summoned people before the magistrate2[ 9 ]. The Oxford Latin Dictionary also defines ‘viator’ as either a traveller or, in the epigraphic context, the addressee of roadside inscriptions, as well as an ofÏcial messenger employed by Roman magistrates, colleges, or public bodie1s0[]. 3.1. Results We extracted the occurrences of the term ‘viator’ in Latin texts from EDCS using tLhaetEpig tool, which resulted in 697 hits, see raw data oGnitHub. Out of the 697 inscriptions containing

1. The noun viator, meaning ’passer-by’ or ’unknown traveller,’ is frequently used in exhortations to pause and reflect on the deceased. Common verbs in the imperative include reste (stop, pause), siste (stop), consiste (stop, stand still)a,ve (hail, farewell)v,ale (farewell, be well),scire (know), cognosce (learn), as well as the first-person singularrogo te (I ask you), or the plural imperativaevete vos viatores (farewell, travellers). This usage accounts for 72.6% of theviator occurrences in the 226 epitaphs. 2. The noun viator also appears in the context of an attendant to a low-ranking Roman ofÏcial, often mentioned as part of the cursus honorum (list of achievements) of the individual in the inscription. Examples includveiator tribunicius, viator consulum/consularis, viator quaestorius, viatori apparitori, viatores collegii, and decurialis viatoris. This group represents 24.8% of theviator occurrences in the 226 epitaphs. 3. In 2.6% of the viator occurrences, the meaning remains uncertain due to fragmentary preservation of the text.

For the temporal distribution of the three contextual groups, dating intervals were available for 174 inscriptions. To address temporal uncertainty in the epigraphic data, we applied Monte

Carlo modelling methods24[], generating 1000 dataset variants based on the widest dating intervals and plotting them with confidence intervals (shown in grey). Figur4ereveals distinct trends: inscriptions mentioning attendants to low-ranking ofÏcers peaked during the JulioClaudian dynasty (1st-2nd centuries CE), declining after 200 CE and disappearing by 400 CE. Inscriptions addressing travellers were most frequent from the late 2nd century CE until 300 CE, after which their numbers declined but persisted in small numbers until 600 CE.

To explore spatial trends, we plotted the contextual groups on a map of the Roman Empire across eight historical periods using Monte Carlo methods. The results in5Fsighow two distinct trends: The results show two distinct trends: a) inscriptions referring to low-ranking ofÏcials are concentrated around Rome throughout all periods, and b) inscriptions addressing passers-by are more geographically dispersed, appearing in both the West and East. Due to its population density and road networks, they cluster in Italy, and also in Moesia Inferior along the northeastern border. A similar trend addressing travellers was also observed in bilingual and Greek inscriptions, using phrases like χαῖρε παροδεῖτα (i.e. EDCS-27800442 from the 4th century CE Constanta / Tomi in modern-day Romania).

The rise of ‘viators’ as the attendants to Roman ofÏcials coincided with the growth of the state apparatus during the Julio-Claudian period, particularly under Emperor Augustus (27 BCE - 14 CE). This era saw an increase in epigraphic production in general and tendencies to elevate one’s social status 6[ , 35 ]. The decline after 200 CE might be explained by a shift in societal values, leading to the prestige deterioration of state servants, or by an unknown regulation, that limited the practice.

The occurrence of ‘viators’ as travellers aligns with the development of the Roman road network and the overall patterns of epigraphic productio16n][, peaking in the late second century CE and declining by the third. However, they remained common until 300 CE, particularly in Moesia Inferior and Superior, where nearly half were linked to soldiers or veterans. Nearly half of the inscriptions from Moesia Inferior (18 out of 38) were dedicated by/to a soldier or a veteran, indicating the strong influence of the Roman military on the epigraphic production along the northeastern border of the Empire. Future research should analyse Greek inscriptions to better understand why ‘viator’ inscriptions were especially popular among soldiers in Moesia compared to other border provinces.

The 697 instances of the term ‘viator’ in EDCS challenge the notion of widespread difusion of these inscriptions. While EDCS does not include every Latin inscription, its broad and consistent spatial coverage makes it unlikely that many ‘viator’ inscriptions are missing. Based on the data extracted from EDCS,LatEpig, we have learnt that the phenomenon is less common than portrayed in reference books and publications, which often highlight specific examples rather than providing a comprehensive overview. UsinLgatEpig, we were able to perform the analysis in a substantially shorter time and in a fully reproducible manner, providindgatahe and scriptsfor reevaluation.

4. Discussion

Most epigraphic databases were designed well before the FAIR and Open Science movement was formulated and introduced to the Humanities. In cases, where their original data structure and its implementation are not up to par with FAIR principles, the development of tools enabling low-threshold access and reuse plays a key role. TLhaetEpig successfully fills the gap between the data and the needs of the researchers, wishing to explore new dimensions, equipped with research questions that go beyond a single data point, or even beyond 10,000 of them. It needs to be reiterated thatLatEpig does not intend to create new data, but to democratise the existing ones by providing easier access and introducing scale and transparency to epigraphic research while giving full credit to the EDCS creators. We do not claim to fix all known issues with the contents of the EDCS, such as unclear attribution of text editions or authorship of the records. Instead, we focus on ensuring the output is stable and transparent, which leads to higher reproducibility of epigraphic research. What once started as a side-funjob, has grown into a mature tool with several success stories, precisely because of the demand from the community, riding on the waves of FAIRification.

We would, of course, prefer there to be no need for a ‘scraper’ in the first place. Tools that rely on parsing the HTML output of a website are notoriously fragile, and our scraper had to be modified several times to reflect upstream changes by the database maintainers [ 33 ]. On the other hand, the democratic accessibility of this tool does not require the database authors to apply for more funding or to engage in a development efort they may not have time or attention for, such as an API. These ad hoc tools also form part of the academic’s toolkit, even if they are fragile by nature. A secondary benefit of our scraper is the ability to preserve the database in TSV and JSON files in case of sudden loss of original data and disappearance of the site. Still, tools like ours form an intermediate phase between early-web projects and those built on the standards of a FAIR and open scholastic and semantic we1b8[].

The FAIR turn in epigraphy is a relatively recent phenomenon, yet much neede1d5,[ 5 ]. A substantial investment was made in creating digital resources, and yet, the reuse of digital datasets in the Humanities lags 3[ 7, 19, 36 ]. Building low-barrier tools such LaastEpig may help alleviate the disconnect between data creators and data users until there is a better uptake and internalisation of the FAIR principles by the data creators in the research community.

Acknowledgments

EDCS is created by Prof. Manfred Clauss, Anne Kolb, Wolfgang A. Slaby, Barbara Woitas, and hosted by the Universitat Zurich and Katolische Universitat Eichstat-IngoldstaLdat.tEpig was built with the permission of Manfred Clauss.

The original free-time project started in 2017 when the authors were employed at the same university and continued evolving into the current form, despite the long distance since 2019.

The writing of this manuscript was made possible thanks to the support of thPeast Social Networks Projec,tfinanced by The Carlsberg Foundation’s Young Researcher Fellowship (CF210382).

A. Online Resources

The one-clickLatEpig tool is available viaMyBinder online servic.e LatEpig sourcecode is available onPyPi, GitHub and Zenodo. [25]

References

[1] C. Adams and R. Laurence . Travel and Geography in the Roman Empire . London, New York: Routledge, 2001 .

[2] B. Ballsun-Stanton , P. Heřmánková , and R. LaurenceL.atEpig, v2 . 0 . 2024 . doi: 10 .5281/z enodo. 12036540 . url: https://github.com/mqAncientHistory/Lat-Epig.

[3] L. Bennett . “ Global Patterns of Commemoration in Roman Epitaphs: A Quantitative Spatial Analysis of the Most Common Formulae.” Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis . University of Kent, 2020 . url:https://kar.kent.ac.uk/83390.

[4] L. Bennett and R. Laurence . “ The Local and the Global: the Use of Formulae in the Epitaphs of Ostia. In Life and Death in a Multicultural Harbour City: Ostia Antica from the Republic through Late Antiquity” . InA:cta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 47 ( 2020 ), pp. 173 - 180 .

[5] J. Bodel , J. Prag , and C. Roueché . “Open Scholarship: Epigraphic Corpora in the Digital Age” . In: Scripta Antiqua ( 2024 ), pp. 91 - 117 .

[6] J. Bodel .Epigraphic Evidence: Ancient History from Inscriptions . London; New York: Routledge, 2001 .

[7] T. Brughmans , P. De Soto, and P. Bjerregaard VahlstruIpti.ner-e: The Digital Atlas of Ancient Roads . 2024 . url: https://itiner-e.org./

[8] A. E. Cooley .The Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 . doi: 10 .1017/cbo9781139020442.

[9] T. Elliott . “ Epigraphy and Digital Resources” . ITnh: e Oxford Handbook of Roman Epigraphy. Ed. by C. Bruun and J. Edmondson . Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2015 , pp. 78 - 85 . doi: 10 .1093/oxfordhb/9780195336467.013.005.

[10] P. G. W. Glare , ed. Oxford Latin Dictionary . Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968 .

[11] T. Glomb , V. Kaše , and P. Heřmánková . “ Popularity of the Cult of Asclepius in the Times of the Antonine Plague: Temporal Modeling of Epigraphic Evidence” . JInou:rnal of Archaeological Science: Reports 43 ( 2022 ), p. 103466 . doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jasrep.20 22 .103466.

[12] J. W. Hanson . An Urban Geography of the Roman World, 100 BC to AD 300. 18 . Oxford: Archaeopress, 2016 . url:http://oxrep.classics.ox.ac.uk/databases/cities./

[13] P. Heřmánková . Edcs. 2021 . doi: 10 .5281/zenodo.4888817.

[14] P. Heřmánková. Edcs Etl . 2022 . doi: 10 .5281/zenodo.6497148.

[15] P. Heřmánková , M. Horster , and J. PragD.igital Epigraphy in 2022 : A Report from the Scoping Survey of the FAIR Epigraphy Project . 2022 . doi: 10 .5281/zenodo.6610696.

[16] P. Heřmánková , V. Kaše , and A. Sobotkova . “ Inscriptions as Data: Digital Epigraphy in Macro-historical Perspective” . InJ:ournal of Digital History 1.1 ( 2021 ), p. 99 . doi: https: //doi.org/10.1515/jdh-2021-1004.

[17] R. Horne and G. Moss.AWMC Geodata . https://github.com/AWMC/geodata, 2024 . url: https://github.com/AWMC/geodata.

[18] E. Hyvönen . Publishing and Using Cultural Heritage Linked Data on the Semantic Web . Springer International Publishing, 2012 . do1i0:. 1007 /978-3- 031 -79438-4.

[19] E. C. Kansa and S. W. Kansa . “ Promoting Data Quality and Reuse in Archaeology through Collaborative Identifier Practices” . In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119.43 ( 2022 ), e2109313118 . doi: 10 .1073/pnas.2109313118.

[20] V. Kaše , P. Heřmánková , and A. Sobotkova . “ Classifying Latin Inscriptions of the Roman Empire: A Machine-learning Approach” . InP:roceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Humanities Research (CHR2021) 2989 ( 2021 ), pp. 123 - 135 . url: http://ceur-ws. o rg/ Vol- 2989 /short%5C% 5Fpaper12 .p d.f

[21] V. Kaše , P. Heřmánková , and A. Sobotková . “ Division of Labor, Specialization and Diversity in the Ancient Roman Cities: A Quantitative Approach to Latin Epigraphy” . InP:los One 17.6 ( 2022 ). Ed. by P. F. Biehl , e0269869 .

[22] V. Kaše , P. Heřmánková , and A. Sobotková . Latin Inscriptions in Space and Time (LIST) . 2024 . doi: 10 .5281/zenodo.10473706.

[23] V. Kaše , P. Heřmánková , and A. Sobotková . Latin Inscriptions of the Roman Empire (LIRE) . 2021 . doi: 10 .5281/zenodo.5074774.

[24] V. Kaše , A. Sobotkova , and P. Heřmánková . “ Modeling Temporal Uncertainty in Historical Datasets” . In: Proceedings of the Computational Humanities Research Conference 2023 3558 ( 2023 ), pp. 413 - 425 . url: https://ceur-ws. org/ Vol- 3558 /paper5123.pd.f A. Kolb . Communications and Mobility in the Roman Empire . Ed. by C. Bruun and J. Edmondson . Oxford University Press, 2015 . doi1: 0 .1093/oxfordhb/9780195336467.013.030.

[26] P. Kruschwitz. Linguistic Variation , Language Change , and Latin Inscriptions. Ed. by C. Bruun and J. Edmondson . Oxford University Press, 2015 . do1i0:.1093/oxfordhb/978019 5336467.013.033.

[27] R. Laurence . The Roads of Roman Italy: Mobility and Cultural Change . London; New York: Routledge, 1999 .

[28] R. Laurence and F. Trifilò . Mediterranean Timescapes: Chronological Age and Cultural Practice in the Roman Empire . London: Routledge, 2023 . doi1: 0 .4324/9781315267708.

[29] C. T. Lewis and C. Short . Latin dictionary [founded on Andrew's edition of Freund's Latin dictionary] . Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879 .

[30] A. Locaputo , B. Portelli , E. Colombi, and G. Serra. “ Filling the Lacunae in ancient Latin inscriptions” . In:19th IRCDL (The Conference on Information and Research science Connecting to Digital and Library science) , February 23-24 , 2023 , Bari, Italy. Bari: CEUR Workshop Proceedings , 2023 . url:https://ceur-ws. org/ Vol- 3365 /short5.pd.f [31] J. Lotz . Working with Databases: The Case of the Epigraphik-Datenbank Clauss/Slaby (EDCS) . Université du Luxembourg . 2020 . urlh:ttps : / / dhh . uni . lu / 2020 / 07 / 10 / worki ng-with-databases-the-case-of-the-epigraphik-datenbank-clauss-slaby-edc .s/ [32] M. McCormick , G. Huang , G. Zambotti , and J. Lavash .Roman Road Network (version 2008 ). 2013 . doi: 10 .7910/dvn/ti0kau.

[33] R. Mitchell . Web Scraping with Python: Collecting More Data from the Modern Web . Sebastopol, CA: O 'Reilly Media , 2018 .

[34] A. Mullen , ed. Social Factors in the Latinization of the Roman West . Oxford University Press, 2023 . doi: 10 .1093/oso/9780198887294.001.0001.

[35] S. Panciera . “ What Is an Inscription? Problems of Definition and Identity of an Historical Source” . In:Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 183 ( 2012 ), pp. 1 - 10 . url: http://w ww. jstor.org/stable/2384985 .9

[36] K.-L. Seaton , R. Laužikas , P. McKeague , V. Moitinho de Almeida, K. May, and H. Wright . “ Understanding Data Reuse and Barriers to Reuse of Archaeological Data. A quality-inuse methodological approach” . InIn:ternet Archaeology 63 ( 2023 ). doi: 10 .11141/ia.63.8.

[37] A. Sobotkova . “ Sociotechnical Obstacles to Archaeological Data Reuse” . AInd:vances in Archaeological Practice 6.2 ( 2018 ), pp. 117 - 124 . doi: 10 .1017/aap. 2017 . 37 .

[38] L. E. Tacoma . Moving Romans: Migration to Rome in the Principate . Oxford University Press, 2016 . doi: 10 .1093/acprof:oso/9780198768050.001.0001.

[39] M. D. Wilkinson , M. Dumontier , I. J. Aalbersberg , G. Appleton, M. Axton , A. Baak , N. Blomberg , J.-W. Boiten , L. B. da Silva Santos , P. E. Bourne , J. Bouwman , A. J. Brookes , T. Clark , M. Crosas , I. Dillo , O. Dumon , S. Edmunds , C. T. Evelo , R. Finkers , A. GonzalezBeltran , A. J. Gray , P. Groth , C. Goble , J. S. Grethe , J. Heringa , P. A. ' t Hoen , R. Hooft , T. Kuhn , R. Kok , J. Kok , S. J. Lusher , M. E. Martone , A. Mons , A. L. Packer , B. Persson , P. Rocca-Serra , M. Roos , R. van Schaik, S.-A. Sansone , E. Schultes, T. Sengstag , T. Slater , G. Strawn, M. A. Swertz , M. Thompson , J. van der Lei , E. van Mulligen, J. Velterop , A. Waagmeester , P. Wittenburg , K. Wolstencroft , J. Zhao , and B. Mons . “ The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship” . InS:cientific Data 3.1 ( 2016 ), p. 160018 . doi: 10 .1038/sdata. 2016 . 18 .