<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>How sociotechnical reflection influence wellbeing and productivity during GenAI integration</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Louise Harder Fischer</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>IT-University of Copenhagen</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Rued Langgaardsvej 7, 2100, Copenhagen</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DK">Denmark</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>STPIS'24: 10th International Conference on Sociotechnical Perspectives in IS</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Sept. 16-17, 2024, Jönköping</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="SE">Sweden</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>9</fpage>
      <lpage>11</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This brief paper summarizes the key insights from a keynote address at the STPIS 2024 workshop by Louise Harder Fischer, an Associate Professor at the IT University of Copenhagen. Louise has long pursued research grounded in the sociotechnical perspective, exploring how this approach-when adapted to the modern world of work-can help shape workplaces where technology enhances not only productivity but also long-term well-being. In her keynote, she shared findings from an ongoing research project that examines how sociotechnical principles can support organizations, teams, and individuals in achieving both productivity and well-being when integrating emerging technologies, especially intelligent systems, into various professions. The first paper from this project was published in June 2024, coinciding with the European Conference on Information Systems.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Sociotechnical principles</kwd>
        <kwd>GenAI integration</kwd>
        <kwd>STAIR Method 1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Theoretical framework and methodology</title>
      <p>
        The research draws on sociotechnical theory and perspectives [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3 ref4 ref6 ref7">2,3,4,6,7</xref>
        ] and work design
theory [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. These frameworks focus on understanding how technology shapes work and the
importance of well-designed jobs in promoting well-being, maintaining skills, and fostering creativity.
Theoretical underpinnings emphasize the need for a proactive approach to work design in
response to GenAI, ensuring that technology enhances rather than diminishes the quality of work
life.
      </p>
      <p>
        An Action Design Research (ADR) approach [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] is employed, consisting of four phases and
seven guiding principles. The present research reports on the first two phases. The first phase
being ‘Problem Formulation’, which centers on practice-inspired research, exploring how to facilitate
the adoption of GenAI and support meaningful knowledge work using sociotechnical
principles. Theoretical foundations were integrated into the creation of an artifact that serves as
the guiding principles for GenAI adoption. The second phase of ‘Building. Intervention &amp;
Evaluation’ covered extensive collaboration with the Communication Department, including
group interviews, workplace observations, and co-creation sessions, in which employees
actively participated in shaping the sociotechnical principles that could guide the ongoing
integration of GenAI in their work processes.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>3. Development of Sociotechnical Principles</title>
        <p>During the second intervention phase, eight sociotechnical principles were co-created with the
employees, ensuring that GenAI integration aligns with workplace values. In table 1 the eight
principles are presented. Applying these principles requires an active dialogue and reflection
systematically organized making sure that when GenAI is integrated in a workflow, STP 1-8 have been
considered.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>4. The STAIR Method, Outcomes and Reflections</title>
        <p>The resulting framework’ is termed the STAIR Method and is an acronym for Sociotechnical
AI Reflection. The method is designed to help employees and organizations navigate the
complexities of AI integration, viewing the process as a continuous and non-linear journey. When
a new usage opportunity comes into focus, it is recommended to go through all the STP’s. In this
way the STAIR method provides a metaphorical "staircase" where professionals from various fields
(e.g., communication, law, IT, accounting) can ascend based on their interactions with GenAI. This
method emphasizes ongoing reflection, allowing organizations to respond dynamically to the
changing nature of GenAI's role in work.</p>
        <p>The presentation emphasized that the STAIR Method and the developed principles can
support leaders in the responsible integration of GenAI, ensuring transparency, governance, and
compliance with emerging regulations such as the EU AI Act. The sociotechnical principles also
help maintain a balance between accountability to organizational rules and the autonomy
necessary for creative and meaningful work at the levels of individuals and groups.</p>
        <p>The study so far offers both theoretical and practical contributions. Theoretically it proposes
the development of a "sociotechnical job crafting theory" that bridges the gap between individual
job crafting and organizational governance, focusing on a human-centered, profession-first
perspective. Practically, the STAIR Method provides a tangible framework for organizations to
manage the integration of GenAI technologies in a way that enhances productivity, well-being,
and ethical practice amidst continuous technological change on several levels.</p>
        <p>The work suggests avenues for future research, particularly in understanding how
sociotechnical principles can continue to evolve in response to the increasing integration of
GenAI across different professions. It also emphasizes the need for practical methods to support
organizations during ongoing shifts in technology, ensuring that genAI adoption remains aligned
with professional standards, well-being, and ethical norms.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Acknowledgements</title>
        <p>Thanks to Martin Lassen-Vernal, Head of Communication, and the entire communication
department in TMF-KK (Copenhagen Municipality), for the valuable collaboration.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.H.</given-names>
            <surname>Fischer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.W.</given-names>
            <surname>Nicolajsen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Marttila</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Sandbukt</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Crafting Meaningful Generative AIEnabled Knowledge Work" (</article-title>
          <year>2024</year>
          ).
          <source>ECIS 2024 Proceedings. 10.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Cherns</surname>
          </string-name>
          , (
          <year>1976</year>
          ).
          <source>The Principles of Sociotechnical Design. Human Relations</source>
          ,
          <volume>29</volume>
          (
          <issue>8</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>783</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>792</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Pasmore</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Winby</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>S.A Mohrman</surname>
          </string-name>
          , &amp; R. Vanasse, (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Reflections: Sociotechnical Systems Design and Organization Change</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Change Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>19</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>67</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>85</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.H.</given-names>
            <surname>Fischer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Wunderlich</surname>
          </string-name>
          &amp; R.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baskerville</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Artificial Intelligence and Digital Work: The Sociotechnical Reversal</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in Proceedings of the 56th HICCS</source>
          ,
          <fpage>226</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>235</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Parker</surname>
          </string-name>
          &amp; G.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grote</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          , February 13). Automation, Algorithms, and Beyond:
          <source>Why Work Design Matters More Than Ever in a Digital World. Applied Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>71</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1171</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1204</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Sarker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Chatterjee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Xiao</surname>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. Elbanna</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Sociotechnical Axis of Cohesion for the IS Discipline: Its Historical Legacy and its Continued Relevance</article-title>
          .
          <source>MIS Quarterly</source>
          ,
          <volume>43</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>695</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>719</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.H.</given-names>
            <surname>Fischer &amp; R. Baskerville</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Explaining sociotechnical change: An unstable equilibrium perspective</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Journal of Information Systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>32</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>634</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>652</lpage>
          .
          <fpage>10</fpage>
          .1080/0960085X.
          <year>2021</year>
          .2023669
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.K.</given-names>
            <surname>Sein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Henfridsson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Purao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Rossi &amp; R. Lindgren</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
          <source>Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly</source>
          ,
          <volume>35</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>37</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>56</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>