<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xml:space="preserve" xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kermitt2/grobid/master/grobid-home/schemas/xsd/Grobid.xsd"
 xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<teiHeader xml:lang="en">
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt>
				<title level="a" type="main">Report on the 12th International Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Software Quality (QuASoQ 2024)</title>
			</titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher/>
				<availability status="unknown"><licence/></availability>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<biblStruct>
					<analytic>
						<author>
							<persName><forename type="first">Horst</forename><surname>Lichter</surname></persName>
							<email>lichter@swc.rwth-aachen.de</email>
							<affiliation key="aff0">
								<orgName type="laboratory">Research Group Software Construction</orgName>
								<orgName type="institution">RWTH Aachen University</orgName>
								<address>
									<settlement>Aachen</settlement>
									<country key="DE">Germany</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<author>
							<persName><forename type="first">Nils</forename><surname>Wild</surname></persName>
							<email>wild@swc.rwth-aachen.de</email>
							<affiliation key="aff0">
								<orgName type="laboratory">Research Group Software Construction</orgName>
								<orgName type="institution">RWTH Aachen University</orgName>
								<address>
									<settlement>Aachen</settlement>
									<country key="DE">Germany</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<author>
							<persName><forename type="first">Thanwadee</forename><surname>Sunetnanta</surname></persName>
							<email>thanwadee.sun@mahidol.ac.th</email>
							<affiliation key="aff1">
								<orgName type="department" key="dep1">Computer Science Academic Group</orgName>
								<orgName type="department" key="dep2">Faculty of Information And Communication Technology</orgName>
								<orgName type="institution">Mahidol University</orgName>
								<address>
									<settlement>Bangkok</settlement>
									<country key="TH">Thailand</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<author>
							<persName><forename type="first">Toni</forename><surname>Anwar</surname></persName>
							<email>toni.anwar@utp.edu.my</email>
							<affiliation key="aff2">
								<orgName type="department" key="dep1">Faculty of Science and Information Technology</orgName>
								<orgName type="department" key="dep2">Chair Computer &amp; Information Systems</orgName>
								<orgName type="institution">Universiti Teknologi Petronas</orgName>
								<address>
									<addrLine>Bandar Seri Iskandar</addrLine>
									<settlement>Perak</settlement>
									<country key="MY">Malaysia</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<author>
							<affiliation key="aff3">
								<orgName type="department">International Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Software Quality</orgName>
								<address>
									<addrLine>December 03</addrLine>
									<postCode>2024</postCode>
									<settlement>Chongqing</settlement>
									<country key="CN">China</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<title level="a" type="main">Report on the 12th International Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Software Quality (QuASoQ 2024)</title>
					</analytic>
					<monogr>
						<idno type="ISSN">1613-0073</idno>
					</monogr>
					<idno type="MD5">5CCFEBC4CAE46FD476B0A85DB0B20E0D</idno>
				</biblStruct>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<encodingDesc>
			<appInfo>
				<application version="0.7.2" ident="GROBID" when="2025-04-23T17:15+0000">
					<desc>GROBID - A machine learning software for extracting information from scholarly documents</desc>
					<ref target="https://github.com/kermitt2/grobid"/>
				</application>
			</appInfo>
		</encodingDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract/>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text xml:lang="en">
		<body>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1.">Introduction</head><p>After a successful 11 th QuASoQ workshop, we have again included the following topics of interest:</p><p>• New approaches to measurement, evaluation, comparison, and improvement of software quality Overall, the workshop aimed to bring together researchers and practitioners to discuss their experiences in applying state-of-the-art approaches to measuring, assessing, and evaluating the quality of software systems and software development processes in general and software test processes in particular.</p><p>As software development organizations are constantly forced to develop software in the "right" quality, quality specification and quality assurance are crucial. Although there are many approaches to dealing with quantitative quality aspects, choosing a suitable set of techniques that best fit the specific project and organizational constraints is still challenging.</p><p>Even though approaches, methods, and techniques have been known for quite some time, little effort has been spent exchanging real-world problems with quantitative approaches. For example, only limited research has been devoted to empirically evaluating the risks, efficiency, or limitations of different testing techniques in industrial settings.</p><p>Hence, one main goal of the workshop was to exchange experience, present new promising approaches, and discuss how to set up, organize, and maintain quantitative approaches to software quality.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.">Workshop History</head><p>The QuASoQ workshop series started in 2013 and has since been organized as a collocated event of the Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC).</p><p>These are the past workshop editions:</p><p>•  </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.">Workshop Format</head><p>After a successful workshop in Seoul, we were delighted to hold it again in Chongqing, China, as part of the 31 st APSEC 2024 conference. However, one author couldn't get a visa in his home country in time, so his presentation had to be held on Zoom.</p><p>Based on our former experience, we wanted the workshop to be highly interactive. To have an exciting and interactive event sharing lots of experience, we organized the workshop presentations applying the author-discussant model.</p><p>According to this workshop model, papers are presented by one of the authors. After the presentation, a discussant starts the discussion based on pre-formulated questions. Therefore, the discussant had to prepare questions and know the presented paper's details. The general structure of each talk was as follows:</p><p>• The paper's author presented the paper (20 minutes).</p><p>• After that, the paper's discussant opened the discussion using their questions. • Finally, we moderated the discussion among the audience (5 minutes).</p><p>The presentations were divided into two sessions, with a coffee break in between. A chair accompanied each session and ensured the schedule was followed.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.">Workshop Contributions</head><p>The following seven papers, covering very different topics, were submitted and accepted by the program committee for presentation and publication (the speaker is set in bold). </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.">Acknowledgments</head><p>Many people contributed to this workshop's success. First, we want to thank the authors and presenters of the accepted papers. Furthermore, we want to express our gratitude to the APSEC 2024 workshop organizers; they did a perfect job and supported us in running the workshop.</p><p>As none of the workshop chairs could attend, Nils Wild from RWTH Aachen University chaired it. Many thanks to Nils for representing the chairs and heading the workshop.</p><p>Finally, we are glad that these people served on the program committee (most of them for many years) and supported the workshop by soliciting papers and writing peer reviews:</p><p>• Thanwadee Sunetnanta Mahidol University, Thailand </p></div><figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="fig_0"><head></head><label></label><figDesc>11 th QuASoQ 2023 Seoul, Korea | CEUR Vol-3612 • 10 th QuASoQ 2022 virtual (Japan) | CEUR Vol-3330 • 9 th QuASoQ 2021 virtual (Taiwan) | CEUR Vol-3062 • 8 th QuASoQ 2020 virtual (Singapore) | CEUR Vol-2767 • 7 th QuASoQ 2019 Putrayaya, Malaysia | CEUR Vol-2511 • 6 th QuASoQ 2018 Nara, Japan | CEUR Vol-2273 • 5 th QuASoQ 2017 Nanjing, China | CEUR Vol-2017 • 4 th QuASoQ 2016 Hamilton, New Zealand | CEUR Vol-1771 • 3 rd QuASoQ 2015 New Delhi, India |CEUR Vol-1519 • 2 nd QuASoQ 2014 Jeju, Korea | IEEE Xplore • 1 st QuASoQ 2013 Bangkok, Thailand | IEEE Xplore Since the first edition, 79 papers have been presented; the average acceptance rate is 78 %. The chart shown in figure 1 depicts where the authors of accepted papers come from.</figDesc></figure>
<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="fig_1"><head>Figure 1 :</head><label>1</label><figDesc>Figure 1: Origin of QuASoQ authors</figDesc><graphic coords="2,72.00,65.61,213.68,178.01" type="bitmap" /></figure>
<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="table" xml:id="tab_1"><head></head><label></label><figDesc>Md Arif Hasan and Toukir Ahammed Understanding the Prevalence of Test Smells in Open-source and Industrial Software: An Empirical Study on Python Projects Jiahui Wang, Yuyan Zhu, Xingyu Li, Ying Xie and Jiaxin Chen A Novel Approach to Automated Test Script Generation using Large Language Models for Domain-Specific Languages</figDesc><table><row><cell>• • Sheng Zou, Liqian Chen, Guangsheng Fan, Renjie</cell></row><row><cell>Huang and Banghu Yin</cell></row><row><cell>F-IKOS: An Abstract Interpretation-based Static</cell></row><row><cell>Analyzer for Fortran Programs</cell></row><row><cell>• Ramita Deeprom, Shiyu Yang, Yoshiki Higo,</cell></row><row><cell>Morakot Choetkiertikul and Chaiyong Ragkhitwet-</cell></row><row><cell>sagul</cell></row><row><cell>Challenges in Adopting LLaMA: An Empirical Study</cell></row><row><cell>of Discussions on Stack Overflow</cell></row><row><cell>• Nasir Mehmood Minhas, Javed Iqbal and Saif Ur</cell></row><row><cell>Rehman Khan</cell></row><row><cell>Requirements Engineering Practices Model to Incorpo-</cell></row><row><cell>rate 'Power' Human Value</cell></row><row><cell>• Jianing Sun,</cell></row><row><cell>• Selin Aydin, Dennis Mertens and Ouyu Xu</cell></row><row><cell>An Automated Evaluation Approach for Jupyter</cell></row><row><cell>Notebook Code Cell Recommender Systems</cell></row><row><cell>• Takumi Katsuie, Shinpei Ogata, Kozo Okano,</cell></row><row><cell>Yukako Iimura and Shinobu Saito</cell></row><row><cell>A Report on Sentiment Analysis of Requirements</cell></row><row><cell>Engineering Artifacts created in University Course</cell></row></table></figure>
		</body>
		<back>
			<div type="annex">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" />			</div>
			<div type="references">

				<listBibl/>
			</div>
		</back>
	</text>
</TEI>
