<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Editorial: The Second International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education - AIxEDU</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gabriella Casalino</string-name>
          <email>gabriella.casalino@uniba.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Carla Limongelli</string-name>
          <email>carla.limongelli@uniroma3.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Daniele Schicchi</string-name>
          <email>daniele.schicchi@itd.cnr.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Davide Taibi</string-name>
          <email>davide.taibi@itd.cnr.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marco Temperini</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Civil, Computer Science and Aeronautical Technologies Engineering, Roma Tre University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Rome</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Computer Science , University of Bari Aldo Moro Bari</institution>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Department of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Rome</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Institute for Educational Technology, Italian National Research Council, CNR-ITD</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Palermo</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The Second International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education (AIxEDU) marks its 2024 edition in conjunction with the 23rd International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA), held from 25-28 November 2024 in Bolzano, Italy. This workshop brings together Artificial Intelligence and Education experts to explore the latest innovations and best practices in applying AI to educational contexts. Participants discuss recent trends, research initiatives, and emerging developments in AI technologies that aim to enhance teaching methodologies, support personalized learning, and address pressing educational challenges. The workshop emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach to understanding how AI systems can promote inclusion, improve learning outcomes, and empower educators while addressing ethical considerations and ensuring equitable access to education aligned with global sustainable development goals.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Artificial Intelligence in Education</kwd>
        <kwd>Personalized Learning</kwd>
        <kwd>Inclusive Education</kwd>
        <kwd>Explainable AI</kwd>
        <kwd>Learning Analytics</kwd>
        <kwd>Ethical AI in Education</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of technological
innovation characterized by the development of models capable of automating and enhancing
human tasks with remarkable eficiency. AI systems, such as ChatGPT, DALL-E, and Perplexity,
have gained widespread popularity, transforming how society interacts with technology [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">1, 2</xref>
        ].
These platforms and others have made cutting-edge AI capabilities accessible to a broad audience,
demonstrating their potential to impact nearly every facet of human life. In education, the
influence of AI is particularly profound, as it introduces novel opportunities and challenges
that are reshaping the educational landscape [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">3, 4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Integrating AI into education brings forward the potential to enhance teaching methodologies
and learning experiences. For educators, AI ofers tools to design personalized instructional
materials tailored to the needs of individual students, including those with disabilities [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. Recent
studies have highlighted how AI-driven systems support teachers in automating time-intensive
tasks such as grading and assessment, allowing them to focus more on pedagogical strategies
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6, 7, 8</xref>
        ]. From the learners’ perspective, intelligent tutoring systems provide personalized,
realtime assistance, fostering improved engagement and skill acquisition across diverse contexts
[9]. These AI applications extend beyond traditional curricula, aiding in developing everyday
competencies and mitigating risks associated with digital environments [10].
      </p>
      <p>One significant area where AI intersects with education is addressing societal and global
challenges, such as those outlined in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
[11]. For instance, AI has shown promise in promoting inclusive education by generating
adaptive materials for students with special needs, including automatically generated concept maps
[12, 13]. Moreover, AI-driven intelligent companions can help students navigate online risks,
such as exposure to toxic content on social media, while fostering digital literacy and critical
thinking skills [14]. Such applications underscore AI’s role in advancing SDG 4, emphasizing
inclusive and equitable quality education for all [15].</p>
      <p>Despite these benefits, the adoption of AI in educational contexts is not without its challenges.
Recent literature has widely discussed concerns about the misuse of generative AI models, the
amplification of biases, and the dissemination of incorrect information [ 16, 17, 18].
Generative models capable of performing complex tasks such as essay writing and image creation
raise ethical and pedagogical questions about their impact on student learning and academic
integrity [19]. Thus, educators and students alike must develop a nuanced understanding of
AI’s capabilities and limitations to ensure its ethical and practical use in educational settings
[20].</p>
      <p>Building on the principles outlined in the UNESCO Beijing Consensus, the AIxEDU workshop
seeks to address these issues by providing a platform for exploring the transformative potential
of AI in education. It aims to foster interdisciplinary dialogue and encourage contributions
investigating the development and deployment of AI systems in educational contexts. The
workshop highlights the need for innovative approaches to human-AI collaboration, promoting
inclusive practices, and the ethical management of educational data. Furthermore, it emphasizes
the importance of explainable AI in fostering trust and transparency, adaptive lifelong learning,
and personalized educational experiences [21, 22, 23]. By bringing together researchers and
practitioners, the workshop aspires to chart a path forward that maximizes the benefits of AI in
education while addressing its inherent challenges.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Workshop’s Contibutions</title>
      <p>We received 37 submissions for the AIxEDU workshop, and after a rigorous review process, 16
were accepted for presentation. In addition to submissions from Italian authors, accepted papers
included contributions from researchers in Sweden, Slovenia, Ukraine, France, and Finland.
This highlights the international significance of the topic of AI in education and underscores the
Italian Conference on Artificial Intelligence as a pivotal event for discussing AI-related issues,
not only for Italian researchers but for the global academic community.</p>
      <p>As shown in Figure 1, the workshop contributions span diverse topics, each reflecting critical
aspects of education and learning. At the core, learning and education remain the central
themes, emphasizing the processes and systems through which knowledge is acquired and
shared. Generative AI, a transformative technology, plays a pivotal role by enabling the creation
of personalized content and innovative instructional materials while raising important ethical
and pedagogical questions. Assessment emerges as another vital focus, with AI ofering solutions
to automate grading and provide insightful feedback, thereby enhancing the evaluation process.
Educators are integral to this landscape, supported by AI-driven tools that simplify routine
tasks and allow for tailored teaching approaches. The workshop also highlights the importance
of tools and technologies that improve accessibility and engagement, as well as challenges
that must be addressed to ensure equitable and efective adoption of AI in educational settings.
Participants signify the collaborative and interdisciplinary nature of these discussions, engaging
diverse stakeholders in shaping the future of AI in education. Together, these topics underscore
the multifaceted impact of AI on the educational landscape and the need for collaborative
exploration to harness its potential responsibly.</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1. Session1: AI in Teaching and Learning Practices</title>
        <p>The paper Enhancing Instructional Design: The Impact of CONALI Ontology and ChatGPT in
Primary Education Training [24] explores the combined use of the CONALI Ontology and
ChatGPT in enhancing the instructional design process for primary education. The study
involved 110 students at the University of Foggia who utilized these tools to design learning
units (LUs). Findings revealed that the structured framework of the CONALI Ontology facilitated
the clear articulation of SMART objectives, while ChatGPT augmented the process by promoting
eficiency and creativity in idea generation. Participants noted both benefits and challenges,
including the need for critical evaluation of AI-generated content. The study underscores the
transformative potential of AI when integrated with pedagogical frameworks to train educators
in developing technology-enhanced learning experiences.</p>
        <p>The paper Generative AI for Teaching Latin and Greek in High School[25] examines the
application of generative AI, particularly ChatGPT, in teaching Latin and Ancient Greek to high
school students, focusing on its potential in Italian Liceo Classico settings. The study highlights
the dual response of resistance and acceptance in educational institutions regarding generative
AI. By using examples and prompts, the research demonstrates how ChatGPT can serve as
a valuable ally, aiding in grammatical analysis, translation, and contextual understanding of
classical texts. Emphasizing a constructivist approach, the paper advocates for the cautious yet
proactive integration of AI to complement traditional pedagogies, thereby enriching the study
of classics without replacing teacher-student interactions.</p>
        <p>The paper Fostering Metacognitive Skills in Programming: Leveraging AI to Reflect on Code [26]
introduces the Reflective AI Programming Lab (RAP Lab), a novel pedagogical framework
designed to enhance metacognition and reflective learning in computer science education. By
having students collaborate on programming tasks using AI-generated code under structured
constraints, the lab encourages them to articulate problem-solving strategies and critically
evaluate AI assistance. AI tools act as impartial observers, fostering a safe environment for
experimentation and error analysis. The approach bridges the gap between educational and
industry practices, emphasizing the development of higher-order cognitive skills crucial for
AI-assisted programming.</p>
        <p>The paper Speeding Up Design and Making to Reduce Time-to-Project and Time-to-Market:
An AI-Enhanced Approach in Engineering Education[27] details the integration of AI tools such
as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot in an advanced engineering course focused on embedded
systems. Students employed AI for tasks including design optimization, coding, debugging, and
documentation, significantly reducing development time. The approach emphasized
promptbased learning, which honed students’ ability to communicate efectively with AI systems.
While AI enhanced eficiency and supported decision-making, students retained control over
critical aspects of their projects, demonstrating the synergy between human creativity and
AI-driven solutions in accelerating innovation.</p>
        <p>The paper Enhancing Digital Object-Based Learning with Haptic Gloves and Virtual Reality
in the Virtual Museum of Tor Vergata[28] explores the RESTART project at the University of
Tor Vergata, which integrates digital object-based learning (OBL) with virtual reality (VR) and
haptic gloves to enrich cultural heritage education. The project employs advanced immersive
technologies to foster the development of transversal skills, including creativity and critical
thinking, while also enhancing participant well-being. Through AI-adapted experiences and
inclusive design, the initiative ensures accessibility for diverse users, including those with
disabilities. The research highlights how technology-driven OBL promotes engagement and
understanding of cultural content while fostering social inclusion and psychological well-being.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2. Session 2: AI in Assessment and Evaluation</title>
        <p>The paper EULER: Fine-Tuning a Large Language Model for Socratic Interactions [29] presents
an innovative approach to enhancing educational utility in large language models (LLMs) by
ifne-tuning them to support Socratic dialogue rather than providing direct answers. Using
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and datasets containing Socratic conversations, the
study demonstrates that models can be trained to guide students toward discovering solutions
independently. The methodology involves processing educational datasets to align with Socratic
principles and evaluating the tuned models against advanced systems like GPT-4o. Results
suggest that this fine-tuning approach significantly improves the models’ ability to foster critical
thinking in educational contexts.</p>
        <p>The paper Large Language Models for the Assessment of Students’ Authentic Tasks: A
Replication Study in Higher Education [30] explores the use of LLMs in evaluating student-written
tasks within a higher education context. Building on previous research, this replication study
employs updated models to assess student submissions using rubrics developed by educators.
By comparing evaluations from LLMs and human experts, the study examines the accuracy
and reliability of AI in academic assessment. Findings indicate that specific adaptations and
guidelines are essential for achieving reliable assessments, highlighting the potential of AI to
enhance scalability and sustainability in educational evaluation.</p>
        <p>The paper Uninvited Generative AI Has Joined Our Students: Tackling Disinformation and
Creating Content with the Help of Generative AI Apps [31] details a workshop aimed at enhancing
students’ information literacy and critical thinking skills through generative AI applications.
Conducted across multiple high school grades, the workshop involved students using AI tools
to address disinformation and create digital content. The study highlights students’ native
interaction with generative AI and their growing awareness of its capabilities. Results underscore
the need for integrating media literacy and ethical considerations into curricula to address the
challenges and opportunities presented by AI in education.</p>
        <p>The paper Redefining Education: A Personalized AI Platform for Enhanced Learning Experiences
[32] discusses the PROSPETTIVA project sponsored by the Sicilian region (Italy), which aims
to enrich secondary education by incorporating AI technologies. The web-based
PROSPETTIVA platform leverages advanced Large Language Models to create personalized learning
environments that actively engage students and enhance AI literacy. Key functions of the
platform include summarization, simplification, and the creation of concept maps, which are
selected for their ability to support in-depth learning and critical thinking. The platform’s
design facilitates seamless switching between diferent LLMs, allowing it to adapt to various
educational needs eficiently. This flexibility, combined with targeted functionalities, ensures
that the platform provides high-quality educational experiences. Initial findings suggest this
approach significantly enhances learning outcomes and helps bridge educational inequalities.
Future work will refine these functionalities and expand the platform based on user feedback.</p>
        <p>The paper Artificial Intelligence in the Professional Activity of a University Lecturer in Ukraine:
Realities and Prospects [33] examines the integration of AI tools into the professional tasks of
Ukrainian university lecturers. Through a comprehensive survey of 205 educators, the study
evaluates the current use and attitudes toward AI in handling routine educational,
methodological, and scientific tasks. Findings reveal varying levels of AI literacy and adoption, emphasizing
the potential of AI to streamline administrative functions while encouraging deeper exploration
of its pedagogical applications. The paper calls for targeted training and guidelines to support
efective AI integration in academia.</p>
        <p>The paper Teacher-AI interaction in the selection of target texts [34] investigates the integration
of an Artificial Agent (AA) in the student assessment correction process and the delivery
of online recursive feedback within educational settings. The main objective is to enhance
the eficiency and efectiveness of feedback to improve the learning process. This research
primarily examines the interaction between the AA and a human agent during the correction
phase. Methodologically, the study employs an AI-driven approach, utilizing a BERT model
specifically tailored for the Italian language to analyze text-based student responses. The AI
system categorizes and ranks student submissions by comparing them with predefined target
texts (TTs), using measures like cosine similarity to assess the degree of resemblance. The
main results indicate that about 80% of student responses were reliably assessed using this
AI approach. The AI system is particularly adept at identifying which texts require further
human evaluation and helps highlight the uncertain elements in the evaluations. It suggests that
while the AI can significantly support the correction process, there are still areas, particularly
regarding subjective assessments, where human intervention remains crucial.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>2.3. Session 3: AI in Educational Systems, Data Analysis, and Challenges</title>
        <p>The paper Co-Designing Media Education Strategies: A Workshop on AI and Information Literacy
[35] examines a pilot workshop conducted under the TADAM project to address the role of
generative AI in media education. This workshop, hosted at the MED Summer School, engaged
educators and researchers in exploring critical aspects of AI’s impact on media production
and misinformation. Using Merrill’s instructional design principles, participants engaged in
hands-on tasks, such as generating and analyzing fake news, to foster critical thinking and media
literacy. The outcome included collaboratively developed guidelines for "critical prompting,"
promoting informed citizenship and the efective use of AI in educational and media contexts.</p>
        <p>The paper From Training KPIs to Learning KPIs: Ensuring Efectiveness in Learning Processes
Through Predictive Analytics and Data-Based Tutoring Actions [36] presents the LearnalizeR
framework, a data-driven model for enhancing online course efectiveness. This model employs
predictive analytics and macro performance indices to identify critical issues in learning
environments and guide tutoring interventions. The framework’s application in two real-world case
studies demonstrates its potential to improve participation, mitigate risks, and optimize course
design. The findings underscore the importance of transitioning from traditional
trainingfocused KPIs to learning-centered evaluation metrics for more impactful digital education.</p>
        <p>The paper Does Time Matter in Analyzing Educational Data? A New Dataset for Streaming
Learning Analytics [37] introduces a novel temporal dataset derived from the Open University
Learning Analytics Dataset (OULAD). This dataset incorporates time-based interaction data,
enabling advanced stream algorithms to analyze learning patterns in real-time. Experiments with
Online Bagging algorithms reveal that temporal structures significantly enhance the predictive
capabilities for student outcomes, particularly for the majority class. However, challenges
remain in addressing minority classes. This research highlights the dataset’s potential to
support dynamic and responsive interventions in Virtual Learning Environments.</p>
        <p>The paper NoVAGraphS: Towards an Accessible Educational-Oriented Dialogue System [38]
discusses the development of NoVABOT, a dialogue system designed for visually impaired
individuals to explore graphical structures like UML diagrams and circuits. Utilizing AIML
technology, the system translates graphical data into interactive textual dialogues accessible
through screen readers. Preliminary evaluations with visually impaired students and their
teachers indicate the system’s efectiveness in facilitating understanding and problem-solving in
various academic disciplines. This project underscores the importance of inclusive educational
technologies in ensuring equitable learning opportunities.</p>
        <p>The paper Evolution of LMS Design and Implementation in the Age of AI and Large Language
Models [39] critiques the outdated architecture of current Learning Management Systems (LMSs)
and proposes a shift to graph-based models integrated with AI functionalities. By transforming
content storage into a knowledge graph, the proposed architecture enables advanced AI features
such as semantic searches and personalized learning. The study highlights challenges in
integrating multi-domain ontologies and adapting to evolving educational demands while
showcasing the transformative potential of AI-driven LMS platforms.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Organizing Committee</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Gabriella Casalino is currently an Assistant Professor (Tenure Track) at the</title>
        <p>Computational Intelligence Laboratory (CILab) of the Informatics Department
of the University of Bari. Her research is focused on Computational Intelligence
methods for interpretable data analysis. She is actively involved in eHealth,
Data Stream Mining, and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence. Her work primarily
focuses on the medical domain. She holds membership in the IEEE Task Force
on Explainable Fuzzy Systems. She is an active member of the computer science
community and contributes by organizing committees of workshops and special sessions in
prestigious international conferences.</p>
        <p>Carla Limongelli Carla Limongelli is an Associate Professor at Roma Tre
University, where she teaches "Fundamentals of Computer Science" at the
bachelor in Informatics and Artificial Intelligence Engineering and
"Technologies and Methodologies for E-learning" at the master in E-learning and Media
Education. Her research activity mainly focuses on Artificial Intelligence in
Education, Recommender Systems, and Information Retrieval. She was one
of the Program Chairs of the 22nd Conference of the Italian Association for
Artificial Intelligence, held in Rome from November 6-9, 2023.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Daniele Schicchi Daniele Schicchi is a research fellow at the Institute for</title>
        <p>Educational Technologies of the National Research Council of Italy (CNR-ITD).
He obtained a Ph.D. in Information Communication Technology at the Doctoral
School in Computer Science ofered by the Consortium of Catania, Messina,
and Palermo universities (Italy). He is involved in the study of the Artificial
Intelligence field and his research interests cover the application of computer
science methodologies and innovative technologies to several domains such as
education and natural-language related fields.</p>
        <p>Davide Taibi Davide Taibi is currently a Senior Researcher with the Institute
for Education Technology, National Research Council of Italy. He is also a
parttime Lecturer with Computer Science Department, University of Palermo. Since
more than 20 years, he has been working in the educational technology research
area, and his main research interests concern pedagogical applications to smart
environments, learning analytics, enriched reality in education, AI in education
and data literacy.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Marco Temperini Marco Temperini is an associate professor of Engineering</title>
        <p>in Computer Science at the Dept. of Computer, Control, and Management
Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.</p>
        <p>He teaches programming techniques and programming of the Web. He got
a Ph.D. in Computer Science at Sapienza in 1992. His recent research activity
is on the theory and technology of distance learning, artificial intelligence in
education, automated assessment, gamification, game based learning, adaptive
e-learning, social and collaborative learning.</p>
        <p>He was workpackage (Intellectual Output) leader and/or national research unit coordinator
in several international projects</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-3-1">
          <title>3.1. Program Committee</title>
          <p>[7] P. V. de Campos Souza, E. Lughofer, A. J. Guimaraes, Regularized neuro-fuzzy ai model
to aid score management in online distance learning forums, in: 2021 IEEE International
Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–8.
[8] G. Biancini, A. Ferrato, C. Limongelli, Multiple-choice question generation using large
language models: Methodology and educator insights, in: Adjunct Proceedings of the
32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, UMAP Adjunct
’24, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2024, p. 584–590. doi:10.
1145/3631700.3665233.
[9] S. Maity, A. Deroy, Generative ai and its impact on personalized intelligent tutoring
systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10650 (2024).
[10] B. U. iu Zaman, Transforming education through ai benefits risks and ethical considerations
(2024).
[11] D. Schicchi, D. Taibi, Ai-driven inclusion: Exploring automatic text simplification and
complexity evaluation for enhanced educational accessibility, in: International Conference
on Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online, Springer, 2023,
pp. 359–371.
[12] B. Abu-Salih, S. Alotaibi, A systematic literature review of knowledge graph construction
and application in education, Heliyon (2024).
[13] P. Ardimento, L. Aversano, M. L. Bernardi, V. A. Carella, M. Cimitile, M. Scalera, Uml
miner: a tool for mining uml diagrams, in: 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on
Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C), IEEE, 2023,
pp. 30–34.
[14] L. A. T. Nguyen, A. Habók, Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: a review, Journal
of Computers in Education 11 (2024) 305–346.
[15] UNESCO, Unesco education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives, 2021.</p>
          <p>URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444.
[16] A. D. Samala, S. Rawas, T. Wang, J. M. Reed, J. Kim, N.-J. Howard, M. Ertz, Unveiling the
landscape of generative artificial intelligence in education: a comprehensive taxonomy of
applications, challenges, and future prospects, Education and Information Technologies
(2024) 1–40.
[17] E. M. Bender, T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, S. Shmitchell, On the dangers of stochastic
parrots: Can language models be too big?, Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on
Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (2021) 610–623.
[18] D. Taibi, G. Fulantelli, V. Monteleone, D. Schicchi, L. Scifo, An innovative platform
to promote social media literacy in school contexts, in: Proceedings of the European
Conference on e-Learning, ECEL, 2021, p. 460 – 470. doi:10.34190/EEL.21.064.
[19] L. Yan, L. Sha, L. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Martinez-Maldonado, G. Chen, X. Li, Y. Jin, D. Gašević,
Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic
scoping review, British Journal of Educational Technology 55 (2024) 90–112.
[20] Y. Fu, Z. Weng, Navigating the ethical terrain of ai in education: A systematic review on
framing responsible human-centered ai practices, Computers and Education: Artificial
Intelligence (2024) 100306.
[21] H. Khosravi, S. B. Shum, G. Chen, C. Conati, Y.-S. Tsai, J. Kay, S. Knight, R.
MartinezMaldonado, S. Sadiq, D. Gašević, Explainable artificial intelligence in education, Computers
and Education: Artificial Intelligence 3 (2022) 100074.
[22] R. Farrow, The possibilities and limits of xai in education: a socio-technical perspective,</p>
          <p>Learning, Media and Technology 48 (2023) 266–279.
[23] G. Casalino, G. Castellano, P. Ducange, M. Fazzolari, R. Pecori, G. Zaza, Leveraging
explainable ai methods and tools for educational data, in: International Conference on
Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online, Springer, 2023, pp.
95–111.
[24] D. Lombardi, L. Traetta, A. Mafei, P. Podržaj, Enhancing instructional design: The impact
of conali ontology and chatgpt in primary education training, in: Proceedings of the
Second International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education co-located
with 23rd International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence
(AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[25] C. Abbondanza, Generative ai for teaching latin and greek in high school, in: Proceedings
of the Second International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education
co-located with 23rd International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial
Intelligence (AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[26] G. Paludo, A. Montresor, Fostering metacognitive skills in programming: Leveraging ai
to reflect on code, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Artificial
Intelligence Systems in Education co-located with 23rd International Conference of the
Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop
Proceedings, 2024.
[27] G. Adorni, D. Grosso, Speeding up design and making to reduce time-to-project and
time-to-market: an ai-enhanced approach in engineering education, in: Proceedings of the
Second International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education co-located
with 23rd International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence
(AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[28] C. De Medio, A. Poce, M. R. Re, Enhancing educational outcomes and well-being through
technology-supported object-based learning: The restart project at the university of tor
vergata, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence
Systems in Education co-located with 23rd International Conference of the Italian
Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop Proceedings,
2024.
[29] G. Bonino, G. Sanmartino, G. Gatti Pinheiro, P. Papotti, R. Troncy, P. Michiardi, Euler:
Fine tuning a large language model for socratic interactions, in: Proceedings of the Second
International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education co-located with
23rd International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA
2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[30] D. Agostini, F. Picasso, H. Ballardini, Large language models for the assessment of students’
authentic tasks. a replication study in higher education, in: Proceedings of the Second
International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education co-located with
23rd International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA
2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[31] E. Murgia, B. S. I. Fumagalli, E. Nicchia, D. Parmigiani, Uninvited generative ai has joined
our students. tackling disinformation and creating content with the help of ai apps, in:
Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems in
Education co-located with 23rd International Conference of the Italian Association for
Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[32] D. Schicchi, D. Taibi, Redefining education: A personalized ai platform for enhanced
learning experiences, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Artificial
Intelligence Systems in Education co-located with 23rd International Conference of the
Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop
Proceedings, 2024.
[33] S. Skvortsova, T. Symonenko, T. Britskan, O. Onopriienko, R. Romanyshyn, Artificial
intelligence in professional activities of a university lecturer in ukraine: realities and prospects,
in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems
in Education co-located with 23rd International Conference of the Italian Association for
Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[34] L. Giannandrea, F. Gratani, L. Screpanti, P. G. Rossi, D. Scaradozzi, Teacher-ai interaction
in the selection of target texts, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on
Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education co-located with 23rd International Conference
of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR
Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[35] M. Ranieri, S. Cuomo, G. Biagini, Co-designing media education strategies: A workshop
on ai and information literacy, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on
Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education co-located with 23rd International Conference
of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR
Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[36] D. Pellegrini, M. Santoro, S. Zuzzi, From training kpis to learning kpis: ensuring
efectiveness in learning processes through predictive analytics and data-based tutoring actions,
in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems
in Education co-located with 23rd International Conference of the Italian Association for
Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[37] G. Casalino, G. Castellano, G. Zaza, Does time matter in analyzing educational data? - a
new dataset for streaming learning analytics, in: Proceedings of the Second International
Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education co-located with 23rd International
Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2024), volume — of
CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[38] M. Oliverio, M. Piroi, D. De Giorgi, P. F. Balestrucci, C. Manolino, A. Mazzei, L. Anselma,
C. Bernareggi, M. Serio, C. Sabena, T. Armano, S. Coriasco, A. Capietto, Novagraphs:
Towards an accessible educational-oriented dialogue system, in: Proceedings of the Second
International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Systems in Education co-located with
23rd International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA
2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024.
[39] A. Molinari, S. Sandri, Evolution of lms design and implementation in the age of ai and
large language models, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Artificial
Intelligence Systems in Education co-located with 23rd International Conference of the
Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2024), volume — of CEUR Workshop
Proceedings, 2024.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Brown</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Mann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Ryder</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Subbiah</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Kaplan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Dhariwal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Neelakantan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Shyam</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Sastry</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Askell</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Agarwal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Herbert-Voss</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Krueger,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Henighan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Child</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ramesh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Ziegler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Wu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Winter</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Hesse</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Sigler,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Litwin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Gray</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Chess</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Clark</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Berner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>McCandlish</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Radford</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Sutskever</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Amodei</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Language models are few-shot learners 33 (</article-title>
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>1877</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1901</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Burton</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Lopez-Lopez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Hechtlinger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Rahwan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Aeschbach</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Bakker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Becker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Berditchevskaia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Berger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Brinkmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Flek</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Herzog</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Kapoor</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Narayanan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A.-M. Nussberger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yasseri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nickl</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Almaatouq</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hertwig</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>How large language models can reshape collective intelligence</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Nature human behaviour 8</source>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Luckin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>George</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M. Cukurova,
          <article-title>AI for school teachers</article-title>
          , CRC Press,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Chiu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Xia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Chai</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M. Cheng,
          <article-title>Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence</source>
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>100118</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O. O.</given-names>
            <surname>Ayeni</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Al Hamad</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Chisom</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Osawaru</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Adewusi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Ai in education: A review of personalized learning and educational technology</article-title>
          ,
          <source>GSC Advanced Research and Reviews</source>
          <volume>18</volume>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <fpage>261</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>271</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Messer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Brown</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M. Kölling,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Shi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Automated grading and feedback tools for programming education: A systematic review</article-title>
          ,
          <source>ACM Transactions on Computing Education</source>
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>43</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>