<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xml:space="preserve" xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kermitt2/grobid/master/grobid-home/schemas/xsd/Grobid.xsd"
 xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<teiHeader xml:lang="en">
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt>
				<title level="a" type="main">A preliminary vocabulary of complexity</title>
			</titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher/>
				<availability status="unknown"><licence/></availability>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<biblStruct>
					<analytic>
						<author role="corresp">
							<persName><forename type="first">Evellin</forename><surname>Cardoso</surname></persName>
							<email>evellin@ufg.br</email>
							<affiliation key="aff0">
								<orgName type="institution">Federal University of Goias</orgName>
								<address>
									<settlement>Goias</settlement>
									<country key="BR">Brazil</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<title level="a" type="main">A preliminary vocabulary of complexity</title>
					</analytic>
					<monogr>
						<idno type="ISSN">1613-0073</idno>
					</monogr>
					<idno type="MD5">F96F56ED4224B894E3D8EBFCCC630C33</idno>
					<idno type="DOI">10.1007/s13194-012-0056-8</idno>
				</biblStruct>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<encodingDesc>
			<appInfo>
				<application version="0.7.2" ident="GROBID" when="2025-04-23T17:11+0000">
					<desc>GROBID - A machine learning software for extracting information from scholarly documents</desc>
					<ref target="https://github.com/kermitt2/grobid"/>
				</application>
			</appInfo>
		</encodingDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<textClass>
				<keywords>
					<term>complexity</term>
					<term>complexity science</term>
					<term>complex systems</term>
					<term>vocabulary</term>
				</keywords>
			</textClass>
			<abstract>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><p>In 20th century, advances in physics (relativity, quantum mechanics, chaos and complex systems) led to the development of the "paradigm of complexity". In this paradigm, scientists realized that the study of modern phenomena could not be classified in any single discipline, thus requiring an interdisciplinary approach. However, although complexity is one of the most promising areas in contemporary science, it is still a fragmented body of knowledge, being composed of a plethora of methods, concepts and principles from a multitude of disciplines. To tackle this conceptual gap, this work proposes a preliminary vocabulary of complexity.</p></div>
			</abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text xml:lang="en">
		<body>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1.">Introduction</head><p>In 20th century, advances in physics (relativity, quantum mechanics, chaos and complex systems) led to the development of the "paradigm of complexity" <ref type="bibr">[1, p. 20]</ref>. In this paradigm, scientists realized that the study of modern phenomena could not be classified in any single discipline, thus requiring an interdisciplinary approach <ref type="bibr" target="#b0">[1,</ref><ref type="bibr" target="#b1">2]</ref>. However, although complexity is one of the most promising areas in contemporary science, it is still a fragmented body of knowledge, being composed of a plethora of methods, concepts and principles from a multitude of disciplines <ref type="bibr" target="#b0">[1]</ref>. To tackle this conceptual gap, this work proposes a preliminary vocabulary of complexity.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.">Research Method</head><p>Given its interdisciplinary nature, I chose four books from different disciplines as the starting points to gather this vocabulary. The first book <ref type="bibr" target="#b0">[1]</ref> is a guided tour in the area of complexity, covering the full history of the topic. The second one <ref type="bibr" target="#b2">[3]</ref> describes how philosophy addresses the topic of complexity, by elaborating hypothesis about the subject, while the third <ref type="bibr" target="#b3">[4]</ref> and fourth ones <ref type="bibr" target="#b1">[2]</ref> are scientific books, respectively from mathematics/simulation and physics.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.">Findings</head><p>Advances in complexity science are still cutting-edge research in many fields, and therefore, there is no general consensus about the necessary and sufficient properties of complex systems. Below, I include only the consensual terms: Definition 1 (Sciences of Complexity). The Sciences of Complexity consists of an interdisciplinary field of study whose goal is to understand how simple, independent entities without a central controller dynamically interact to generate a coherent whole that strives to achieve collective goals, generate patterns, exchange information, adapt and learn.</p><p>At the heart of the sciences of complexity, there is the concept of complex systems, together with a number of properties: Definition 2 (Complex Systems). A complex system is a tuple 𝐶 𝑠 =&lt; 𝐸, 𝐼 &gt;, where 𝐶 𝑠 , E, I are, respectively, a complex system, a set of elements within 𝐶 𝑠 and a set of interactions on E.</p><p>• Elements. A complex system is composed of many elements, being them the prerequisite for interactions to occur. These elements depend on the studied field (e.g., atoms in quantum systems, cells in biology, ants and bees in biology, people and companies in economics, etc.). The macroscopic order that emerges is only possible when these large number of parts are present, allowing the complex systems to display their self-organizing properties <ref type="bibr" target="#b2">[3,</ref><ref type="bibr" target="#b1">2]</ref>.</p><p>• Interactions. Interactions are exchanges of energy, matter, or information, whose interaction mechanisms can be collisions, forces or communication <ref type="bibr" target="#b2">[3]</ref>. They are at the heart of complex systems: without them, the system would be just an aggregation of independent particles, with no possibility of displaying self-organizing properties.</p><p>• Self-organization. The distinguishing feature of complex systems is their dynamic behavior. This behavior falls between organized simplicity (simple, deterministic) and disorganized complexity (complex, random). They dynamically "self-organize", creating order out of disorder, contrary to the natural tendency of systems to follow the 2nd law of thermodynamics (entropy) of total disorder <ref type="bibr" target="#b0">[1]</ref>. To understand and characterize how self-organization happens is the core of the discipline of complex systems <ref type="bibr" target="#b3">[4]</ref>. What represents "order" and "disorder" varies significantly, some scientists argue that information processing features may be useful to measure order/disorder <ref type="bibr" target="#b0">[1]</ref>, while others include notions such as symmetry, organization, periodicity, determinism <ref type="bibr" target="#b2">[3]</ref> or the formation of patterns <ref type="bibr" target="#b4">[5]</ref>.</p><p>• Information-processing. The way how complex systems handle information is the feature that explains how they operate <ref type="bibr" target="#b2">[3,</ref><ref type="bibr" target="#b0">1]</ref>. Literature explains that natural complex systems compute information in order to adapt to its environment and learn <ref type="bibr" target="#b2">[3,</ref><ref type="bibr" target="#b0">1]</ref>. The meaning of what precisely constitutes information and what the complex system does with this information still remains largely unanswered by the community <ref type="bibr" target="#b0">[1]</ref>. The hypothesis is that the individual elements locally interact, giving rise to local systems states. Local states lead to the emergence of a global state of the system. Thus, computation is the result of decentralized interactions.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.">Conclusion</head><p>This work has presented a preliminary vocabulary of complexity. This vocabulary only considers the consensual terms found in literature. As a future work, I intend to investigate other terms, such as emergence, entropy, equifinality, etc. Further, I intend to extend a foundational ontology with this novel vocabulary in order to improve semantic clarity of these terms.</p></div>		</body>
		<back>
			<div type="references">

				<listBibl>

<biblStruct xml:id="b0">
	<monogr>
		<title level="m" type="main">Complexity: A Guided Tour</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">M</forename><surname>Mitchell</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2009">2009</date>
			<publisher>Oxford University Press, Inc</publisher>
			<pubPlace>USA</pubPlace>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b1">
	<monogr>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">Y</forename><surname>Bar-Yam</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<title level="m">Dynamics of Complex Systems</title>
				<meeting><address><addrLine>USA</addrLine></address></meeting>
		<imprint>
			<publisher>Perseus Books</publisher>
			<date type="published" when="1997">1997</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b2">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">What is a Complex System?</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><surname>Ladyman</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><surname>Lambert</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">K</forename><surname>Wiesner</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<idno type="DOI">10.1007/s13194-012-0056-8</idno>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">European Journal for Philosophy of Science</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">3</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="33" to="67" />
			<date type="published" when="2013">2013</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b3">
	<monogr>
		<title level="m" type="main">Introduction to the Modeling and Analysis of Complex Systems</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">H</forename><surname>Sayama</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2015">2015</date>
			<publisher>Open SUNY Textbooks</publisher>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b4">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Chapter 3 -What Lies Between Order and Chaos?</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><forename type="middle">P</forename><surname>Crutchfield</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="m">Art and Complexity</title>
				<editor>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><surname>Casti</surname></persName>
		</editor>
		<editor>
			<persName><forename type="first">A</forename><surname>Karlqvist</surname></persName>
		</editor>
		<meeting><address><addrLine>JAI, Amsterdam</addrLine></address></meeting>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2003">2003</date>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="31" to="45" />
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

				</listBibl>
			</div>
		</back>
	</text>
</TEI>
