<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>D. (2018). The acceptance of blockchain technology in meat
traceability and transparency. British Food Journal</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Exploring consumer intention to purchase blockchain- traced pasta⋆</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maurizio Canavari</string-name>
          <email>maurizio.canavari@unibo.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences. Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Viale Fanin 50, Bologna</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Giulia Maesano</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2066</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>31</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>108</fpage>
      <lpage>111</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This study explores consumers' purchase intentions for organic pasta with blockchain-based traceability, employing an extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB) model. Analysing responses from 190 Italian respondents via a structured online questionnaire, the research investigates how attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, trust in quality certifications, and attitudes toward technology shape purchase intentions for blockchain-based food. Structural equation modelling (SEM) reveals that subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, and positive attitudes toward technology significantly influence purchase intention. In contrast, trust in quality certifications and general attitudes toward blockchain traceability show no direct impact. The findings highlight the importance of social influence and technological familiarity in promoting blockchain adoption for food transparency.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Consumer purchase intention</kwd>
        <kwd>Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB)</kwd>
        <kwd>organic pasta</kwd>
        <kwd>blockchain</kwd>
        <kwd>traceability</kwd>
        <kwd>food transparency</kwd>
        <kwd>Italian consumers</kwd>
        <kwd>blockchain adoption</kwd>
        <kwd>food quality certification</kwd>
        <kwd>technology acceptance</kwd>
        <kwd>agri-food sector 1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Consumers are increasingly concerned about food safety, traceability and transparency in the
current globalized food market. These issues have led to declining consumer trust, especially in
complex food supply chains [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. In this context, blockchain technology can further increase
transparency by providing a decentralized and immutable product history record [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. While
blockchain technology's potential to improve traceability and trust is widely recognized, consumer
adoption continues to depend on various behavioural factors. Previous studies indicate that
blockchain technology positively influences consumers' purchasing decisions [3,4,5]. However, the
perceived value of the innovative traceability solution varies widely. We conducted an online
questionnaire selecting a convenience sample of 251 Italian respondents to investigate purchasing
intentions toward organic pasta. The study applies an extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB)
model to explore the factors influencing consumer purchase intentions in the context of
blockchaintraced organic pasta.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Theoretical framework</title>
      <p>The theory of planned behaviour (TPB) postulated by Ajzen (1980) [6] assumes that individual
behaviour depends on three key elements: attitudes toward the behaviour of buying
blockchaintraced products (ATT), subjective norms (SN), and perceived behavioural control (PBC). As shown
in Figure 1, this model assumes that attitude, subjective norm, and behavioural control impact
behavioural intention and, in turn, on behaviour. However, this study aims to enhance the predictive
power of TPB. In addition to the original elements of TPB, additional constructs are introduced: Trust
in quality certification (TQC), and Attitude toward technology (TEC). In this model, we only measure
intention; however, we include behavior because we believe that intention is an indicator of
behavior.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Data and Methods</title>
      <p>Data were collected through an online survey distributed across social media platforms to select
a convenience sample of Italian consumers. A total of 251 responses were collected, with 190
complete responses valid for analysis after data screening. Based on TPB constructs, the
questionnaire also included questions on consumer trust in quality certifications and attitudes
toward technology.</p>
      <p>Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to assess the relationships among these
constructs. The SEM well well-established practice and widely used technique in several research
domains was chosen to examine the expanded theoretical framework. Various multivariate analysis
techniques are included under the umbrella of SEM [7]. This study used the partial least squares
approach (PLS-SEM). PLS-SEM is a statistical tool that has gained popularity among researchers who
use it to analyse empirical data and evaluate different relationships concurrently [8].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Results</title>
      <p>The PLS-SEM analysis (Table 1) showed that SN - subjective norms (β = 0.403) and TEC - Attitude
toward technology (β = 0.306) significantly impacted consumers' intentions to purchase
blockchaintraced organic pasta (INT), supporting our hypotheses H1 and H5. Moreover, PBC - perceived
behavioural control (β = 0.187) was also a significant predictor, confirming our hypothesis H2.
However, ATT - attitudes toward the behaviour of buying blockchain-traced products (β = 0.003)
and TQC - trust in quality certifications (β = 0.006) did not significantly influence purchase
intentions, rejecting the hypotheses H3 and H4.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusions and Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Decision</title>
        <p>Accepted
Accepted
Rejected
Rejected
Accepted</p>
        <p>The findings reveal that social influences and perceived behavioural control are crucial for
encouraging the adoption of blockchain-traced foods. The significant role of subjective norms
indicates that social endorsement can drive consumer intention toward blockchain-labeled organic
pasta. Furthermore, a positive attitude toward technology is pivotal, underscoring the importance of
technological familiarity in adoption behaviours. However, trust in existing quality certifications did
not affect purchase intentions, suggesting that blockchain traceability does not yet align with
traditional trust markers in consumers' minds.</p>
        <p>Policymakers and producers should consider strategies that focus on simplifying blockchain
product accessibility, enhancing social endorsement, and educating consumers about blockchain's
added value for transparency and food safety. By addressing these areas, stakeholders can better
support blockchain adoption in the agri-food sector and improve trust, traceability, and product
authenticity.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>This study was carried out within the Agritech National Research Center and received funding
from the European Union Next-GenerationEU (PIANO NAZIONALE DI RIPRESA E RESILIENZA
(PNRR) – MISSIONE 4 COMPONENTE 2, INVESTIMENTO 1.4 – D.D. 1032 17/06/2022, CN00000022)
for the authors G.M. and M.C.. This paper reflects only the authors’ views and opinions, neither the
European Union nor the European Commission can be considered responsible for them. The study
received funding from the European Union's HE research and innovation program under grant
agreement No 101084188, for the authors A.C. and S.S.. Views and opinions expressed are, however,
those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European
Research Executive Agency (REA). Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be
held responsible for any use that may be made of the information the document contains. A special
thank goes to Alessandra Russo for her help during the data collection.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <sec id="sec-7-1">
        <title>The author(s) have not employed any Generative AI tools.</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reitano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pappalardo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Selvaggi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zarbà</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chinnici</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Factors influencing consumer perceptions of food tracked with blockchain technology. A systematic literature review</article-title>
          .
          <source>Applied Food Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>100455</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Singh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sharma</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Application of blockchain technology in shaping the future of food industry based on transparency and consumer trust</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Food Science and Technology</source>
          ,
          <volume>60</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1237</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1254</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>