<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Digitalization and Employment Trends in the European Union</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nataliia Dziubanovska</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vadym Maslii</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>West Ukrainian National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>11 Lvivska Str., Ternopil, 46009</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The article examines the impact of digitalization on the labor market in European countries, with a focus on cluster analysis, which allows for the identification of groups of countries with similar characteristics. Using a multifactor regression analysis, it was found that digital technologies, such as e -commerce, broadband internet access, and financial services, have a significant influence on employment. The results show that countries with active implementation of electronic services can have a positive impact on the labor market, while less developed countries face challenges due to insufficient digital infrastructure. Adapting policies aimed at increasing digitalization is an important step for employment growth in each cluster. Based on the obtained data, recommendations for countries are proposed, including improving access to digital technologies, promoting e-commerce, and developing skills in the ICT sector. This article makes some contribution to understanding the relationship between digitalization and employment, offering new perspectives for shaping effective policies in this area.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>1 digitalization</kwd>
        <kwd>employment</kwd>
        <kwd>e-commerce</kwd>
        <kwd>regression analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>cluster analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>digital technologies</kwd>
        <kwd>broadband access</kwd>
        <kwd>financial services</kwd>
        <kwd>employment policies</kwd>
        <kwd>European Union</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The beginning of the 21st century was marked by the emergence of a new global phenomenon –
digitalization of the economy, driven by the rapid spread of the Internet. The</p>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>World</title>
        <p>
          Telecommunication Standardization Assembly provides the following statistics: in 2021, 63% of the
world’s population were active users of the World Wide Web [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ]. According to Cloudflare, global
Internet traffic in 2023 increased by 25% compared to the previous year, and the traffic of satellite
provider SpaceX Starlink tripled, while in some countries that had only recently begun using this
operator’s services, growth was recorded in multiples [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ]. Digital innovations not only affect
employment levels but also change the forms of employment and the skills required of workers.
According to estimates by the World Economic Forum, by 2025, due to shifts in the distribution of
labor between humans and machines, 85 million jobs could be displaced, while 97 million new jobs,
better adapted to this new distribution, may emerge [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ]. Economically developed countries are
rapidly implementing digital technologies, which are primarily transforming the labor market. The
countries of the European Community have their own digitalization strategy, aimed at promoting
economic growth for all members of this economic alliance, as well as increasing jobs, investments,
innovations, etc. Analysts, scientists, and researchers emphasize that digital innovations integrated
into the economy of any country can pose threats and challenges to existing labor markets and
impact employment. D. Acemoglu and R. Restrepo (2020) note that significant progress in the fields
of artificial intelligence, machine learning, communication technologies, its consequences, and their
impact on employment is an open and important issue that needs to be thoroughly researched [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Literature review</title>
      <p>
        W. P. Groen, K. Lenaerts, R. Bosc, and F. Paguier (2017) state that the consequences of digitalization
of the economy can be very serious in the context of job creation/job reduction. However, they also
note that there is no consensus on how much the Fourt h Industrial Revolution, which involves the
widespread adoption of digital innovations and information computer technologies, will impact
employment [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. A study conducted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development indicates that previous industrial revolutions led to an increase in jobs after a certain
period, but initially, there was a reduction in jobs. New technologies will boost productivity, thus
reducing the need for jobs; on the other hand, they will lead to lower prices, and consequently, an
increase in demand. Therefore, it is difficult to determine how strongly both effects will differ across
economic sectors, regions, and time [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. A. Smith and J. Anderson (2014) also highlight the
uncertainty of the impact of digital transformations on employment, based on the results of a Pew
Research Center survey [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. The research by R. Pena-Casas, D. Ghailani, and S. Coster (2018) shows
that digitalization processes affect both employment levels and its quality, with the consequences
depending on sectors and professions [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. S. Sandri, N. Alshyab, and M. Shaban (2022) emphasize
that digital transformation can be a source of competitive advantage and a driver of economic growth
in any country, helping to reduce unemployment if effective government policies are in place [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. A.
Kolot et al. (2022), after substantiating current trends in employment in the context of the digital
economy, confirmed the hypothesis regarding both the constructive and destructive impacts of
digitalization on employment structure. In examining the interaction between these processes in the
Ukrainian context, the authors concluded that the introduction of digital technologies had the
greatest impact on high-tech sectors, while no such connection was observed in industrial sectors
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. D. Lederman and M. Zouaidi (2022), analyzing the relationship between digital economy
development and unemployment levels in countries with different levels of economic development,
found a negative correlation between these indicators, with the relationship being stronger in
developing countries than in highly developed ones. To mitigate such an impact, the authors propose
introducing control over the prevalence of informal employment [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. A. M. Santos, J. Barbero, S.
Salotti, and A. Conte (2023), in their comprehensive study of ICT investments across EU countries
during 1995–2019, simultaneously concluded that the impact of digitalization on employment is
heterogeneous across different countries [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. N. Dziubanovska et al. (2023) identified a significant
impact of digital economy indicators, particularly e-banking, on the volumes of international trade
in goods and services [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]. W. Yunxia, H. Neng, and M. Yechi (2023) analyzed the impact of digital
economy development on the scale of employment in China and concluded that digitalization
positively affects employment levels by increasing the share of high- and medium-skilled labor while
reducing the share of low-skilled labor. They explain this effect through scale and productivity
expansion effects [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ]. The results of the study conducted by E. Prytkova et al. (2024) showed that
there is a direct link between the introduction of digital technologies and employment in European
countries during 2012–2019, contributing to the emergence of three types of effects: substitution,
productivity, and recovery [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Methodology</title>
      <p>To assess the level of digitalization of the economies of EU member states, the European Commission
uses the Digital Economy and Society Index. It has been calculated since 2014 and consisted of the
following components: connectivity, human capital, use of the Internet, integration of digital
technologies, and digital public services. In 2021, taking into account the EU’s political initiatives in
the context of digital transformation, namely the creation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility and
the adoption of the Digital Decade Compass policy program, the structure of the index was
transformed into a four-dimensional one (Table 1).</p>
      <p>
        Given the data for the period from 2017 to 2022 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ], we will analyze the dynamics of DESI growth
to gain a deeper understanding of the pace of digital transformation in EU countries. This will allow
for a comparison of their achievements in implementing digital technologies and an assessment of
the effectiveness of national strategies in this area. This analysis will help identify countries with the
most significant changes in indicators, indicating their progress in adopting digital technologies, as
well as highlight areas where improvements are still needed (Figure 1).
      </p>
      <p>During the studied period, there was a general improvement in digital indicators in most
European countries, indicating active implementation of digital technologies. However, in 2021,
many countries experienced a slowdown in growth, which could be a result of economic challenges
related to the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical changes. Lithuania, Italy, and Bulgaria showed
the highest average growth rates over five years, reflecting steady progress in the development of
digital technologies. Belgium, Hungary, and Romania displayed unstable results, with periodic
declines, indicating challenges in adapting to digital changes.</p>
      <p>The analysis of DESI growth for the period 2017–2022 suggests that digital transformation in
Europe is occurring unevenly. To gain a deeper understanding of digitalization processes in
European countries and to identify groups of countries showing similar trends in digital
transformation, cluster analysis of countries based on DESI growth was conducted.</p>
      <p>In the first stage of cluster analysis, the “elbow” method was used to determine the optimal
number of clusters. This approach involves constructing a graph of the sum of squared distances
within clusters (WCSS) for different values of the number of clusters. The goal is to identify the point
of inflection, or “elbow,” on the graph (Figure 2), after which further increases in the number of
clusters only slightly reduce the WCSS. This point indicates the optimal number of clusters.</p>
      <p>In the next stage, clustering was performed using the k-means method, which divides the data
into clusters by minimizing the within-cluster sum of squares. As a result, all EU member states were
grouped into four clusters based on the pace of digital technology adoption (Table 2).</p>
      <p>The cluster analysis based on DESI growth indicators identified four main groups of countries
that differ in their pace of digital transformation. The first cluster (Cluster 0) includes countries that
show moderate growth in DESI indicators, with periodic fluctuations. Some of them, such as Croatia
and Hungary, exhibit significant positive changes, but there are also negative values in 2021,
indicating instability in their digital transformation. The second cluster (Cluster 1) comprises
countries with high DESI growth rates, but they also experience some fluctuations. Overall, these
countries hold strong positions in digitalization, which may suggest significant investments in digital
technologies. The third cluster (Cluster 2) is characterized by high DESI growth rates and stable
performance, indicating a certain maturity in the digitalization processes. Countries in this cluster
demonstrate the best results in this area, highlighting the effectiveness of national strategies. Lastly,
the fourth cluster (Cluster 3) consists of countries with low DESI growth rates, suggesting the need
for more intensive efforts to improve their digital indicators. It can be assumed that these countries
face challenges related to economic development and adaptation to new technologies.</p>
      <p>Thus, the results of the cluster analysis indicate different stages of digital transformation
development across European countries, which can aid in designing targeted strategies for each
cluster, considering their specific needs and challenges.</p>
      <p>To visualize the clustering results, the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method was applied,
reducing the multidimensional data to two components for easier visualization. PCA reduces the
number of dimensions while preserving the maximum data variance, allowing for a clear
representation of the data structure and relationships between clusters (Figure 3).</p>
      <p>The resulting visualized image highlights the differences between the data clusters, emphasizing
their unique characteristics. This analysis not only facilitates the understanding of key patterns but
also helps identify potential areas for further research and the implementation of targeted actions
within the digital economy.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Results</title>
      <p>
        In today’s world, digitalization has become a key factor shaping the socio-economic development of
countries. Understanding the impact of digital technologies on employment is crucial for developing
effective labor market policies. The primary goal of this study is to identify the influence of various
aspects of digitalization on the overall employment levels in EU countries, according to Eurostat data
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The selection of independent variables for analysis was based on key aspects that determine a
country’s level of digital transformation, which are included in the DESI (Table 3).</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Use of Internet Services</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Integration of Digital Technology</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>Digital Public Services</title>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-1">
          <title>Employed ICT specialists (Percentage of total employment) (X4)</title>
          <p>*A higher percentage of ICT specialists indicates a skilled
workforce capable of driving digital economy growth and
innovation.*</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-2">
          <title>Internet purchases by individuals (X5)</title>
          <p>*Online shopping habits reflect consumer behavior and
adaptability to digital employment trends.*</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-3">
          <title>Individuals – internet use (Percentage of individuals who used</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-4">
          <title>Internet within the last year) (X6)</title>
          <p>*The level of internet use indicates how well-prepared individuals
are for remote job opportunities.*</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-5">
          <title>Promoting e-commerce for individuals (X7)</title>
          <p>*Encouraging online commerce suggests readiness to engage in
digital job markets, enhancing employment opportunities.*</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-6">
          <title>Financial activities over the internet (X8)</title>
          <p>*Engagement in online financial services can increase job
opportunities in the financial technology sector.*</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-7">
          <title>E-commerce (X9)</title>
          <p>*The presence of e-commerce platforms enhances job
opportunities by connecting buyers and sellers in a digital
marketplace.*</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-8">
          <title>Selling goods or services (X10)</title>
          <p>*The ability to sell online demonstrates entrepreneurial spirit and
potential for job creation in the digital economy.*</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-9">
          <title>Promoting e-commerce for business (X11)</title>
          <p>*Support for e-commerce in business reflects job growth potential
in digital sectors, attracting talent and investment.*</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-10">
          <title>E-government activities of individuals via websites (X12)</title>
          <p>*Participation in e-government services can lead to job creation in
public sector services and improve civic engagement.*</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-11">
          <title>E-banking (X13)</title>
          <p>*The growth of e-banking indicates a comfort with digital
transactions, which can facilitate job creation in fintech and
related sectors.*</p>
          <p>The dependent variable chosen for the analysis was Total employment (Percentage of total
population from 20 to 64 years) (Y). Regression models were built for each of the four clusters,
allowing for a detailed examination of the relationship between the independent digitalization
factors and the dependent variable – total employment. This study aims to uncover not only
correlations between digital indicators and employment levels but also to understand which factors
play the most significant role in these processes. The results of the analysis may serve as a basis for
further policy recommendations and strategies for the development of digital technologies in
different countries.</p>
          <p>The results of the multivariate regression analysis for the first cluster (Figure 4) show that digital
innovations have a significant impact on overall employment levels.</p>
          <p>The model that assesses the impact of various factors on the overall level of employment is quite
effective. An R-squared value of 0.820 indicates that 82% of the variation in total employment is
explained by the independent variables, demonstrating a high quality of the model. The adjusted
Rsquared value of 0.772 further confirms this, taking into account the number of predictors in the
model.</p>
          <p>The regression equation for Cluster 0:</p>
          <p>= 58.1581 + 0.1126 1 − 0.1929 5 + 0.4598 7 + 0.2104 12.</p>
          <p>The constant coefficient is 58.1581, indicating the expected value of the overall level of
employment when all independent variables are equal to zero. This coefficient is statistically
significant (p = 0.000).</p>
          <p>Among the key independent variables that have a statistically significant impact on employment,
the promotion of e-commerce for individuals stands out, with a positive coefficient of 0.4598
(p = 0.021). This means that increasing initiatives aimed at popularizing e-commerce positively
affects employment. E-government services for individuals via websites have also proven to be
important, with a positive coefficient of 0.2104 and p = 0.000. This suggests that the availability of
digital government services can improve the labor market situation by simplifying
employmentrelated processes. In contrast, Internet purchases by individuals has a negative coefficient of –0.1929
with p = 0.030. This may indicate that an increase in online shopping is associated with a decrease
in employment in the traditional sector, suggesting a displacement of jobs in retail. The results of
the study also confirm that broadband internet coverage by speed has a positive impact on overall
employment (coefficient of 0.1126, p = 0.001), demonstrating the importance of infrastructure
development to ensure internet access, as it can contribute to creating new job opportunities.</p>
          <p>Overall, the results indicate that countries in this cluster have the potential for further
development, considering the positive impact of digital technologies on employment. However, they
also emphasize the need for a strategic approach to implementing digitalization, taking into account
the specifics of each country. This can serve as a basis for developing policies aimed at increasing
employment levels in the context of the rapid development of the digital economy.</p>
          <p>For Cluster 1, the resulting equation for the multiple regression analysis is as follows:</p>
          <p>The R-squared value is 0.716, indicating that approximately 71.6% of the variation in the overall
level of employment can be explained by the selected variables, showing a moderate correlation
between digital technologies and employment levels.</p>
          <p>It is worth noting that the constant (107.2753) represents the baseline level of employment in
these countries in the absence of other influencing factors. A significant positive correlation with
“sales of goods and services” (coefficient 0.2594, p = 0.004) suggests that an increase in sales
contributes to job creation. There is also a positive impact from online financial activities (coefficient
0.1961, p = 0.001), highlighting the importance of digital financial services in this group of countries.</p>
          <p>Additionally, the positive relationship with Internet purchases by individuals (coefficient 0.1909,
p = 0.048) reflects the growing significance of e -commerce for the economy of Cluster 1. However,
the negative impact of “broadband internet coverage by technology” may indicate that insufficient
broadband Internet development is a limiting factor for employment growth (coefficient –0.2576, p
= 0.023).</p>
          <p>Countries in Cluster 1 show a diversity in the use of digital technologies, underscoring the
importance of considering the specific contexts of each country. This indicates a need for policies
aimed at promoting e-commerce and financial technologies as crucial factors that can contribute to
job creation in these countries.</p>
          <p>Based on the results of the multiple regression analysis for Cluster 2, the model equation is as
follows:</p>
          <p>= 22.3702 + 0.1335 1 + 1.8001 4 − 0.1680 5 + 2.2338 6 + 0.6404 7.</p>
          <p>The R-squared value is 0.975, indicating that 97.5% of the variation in the overall level of
employment can be explained by the use of digital technologies. This suggests that the countries
with high employment levels demonstrate a very strong correlation between employment and digital
technologies.</p>
          <p>The constant (22.3702) represents the baseline level of employment in these countries in the
absence of other factors. A significant positive correlation with “promotion of e-commerce for
individuals” (coefficient 0.6404, p = 0.003) indicates a positive impact of such activities on job
creation. This suggests that promoting e-commerce stimulates consumer demand and leads to
increased employment.</p>
          <p>It is also important to note that “broadband internet coverage by speed” (coefficient 0.1335, p =
0.001) has a significant positive effect, highlighting the importance of high-quality internet
connectivity for supporting employment in these countries. Additionally, the indicator “individuals
– internet use” also has a high positive coefficient (coefficient 2.2338, p = 0.001), indicating the
significance of actively utilizing internet technologies for job creation.</p>
          <p>The number of I CT specialists also has a significant positive impact on employment (coefficient
1.8001, p = 0.000). This confirms that the development of information technology and related
employment in this sector contributes to overall employment growth.</p>
          <p>However, the negative impact of “internet purchases by individuals” (coefficient –0.1680,
p = 0.005) suggests potential problems in this area, possibly due to decreased demand for traditional
services or goods. Other variables, such as e-government activities and online financial activities, did
not show statistically significant effects on employment, indicating a need to improve these services.</p>
          <p>Countries in Cluster 2 likely have strong prerequisites for the development of the digital
economy; however, it is essential to pay attention to the specifics of each country and consider their
unique contexts when developing policies that will promote employment growth through
digitalization.</p>
          <p>The results of the regression analysis for Cluster 3 demonstrate an extraordinarily high level of
explanatory power for the model, with an R-squared value of 0.982:
(3)
 = 45.4069 + 0.082 1 + 8.6569 4.
(4)</p>
          <p>This means that 98.2% of the variation in the overall level of employment in these countries can
be explained by the use of digital technologies and related factors. The constant (45.4069) indicates
the baseline level of employment in the absence of other influencing factors.</p>
          <p>A key indicator is the “employed ICT specialists” (coefficient 8.6569, p = 0.000), which has a
significant positive impact on the overall level of employment. This demonstrates that an increase
in the number of I CT specialists directly contributes to employment growth in the region,
highlighting the importance of skilled personnel in the digital economy.</p>
          <p>Broadband internet coverage by speed (coefficient 0.0820, p = 0.050) also shows a positive effect
on employment, albeit at the edge of statistical significance. This suggests that improving internet
connection speeds may contribute to economic growth and job creation.</p>
          <p>However, other factors did not show statistically significant effects on employment. These results
indicate that for countries in Cluster 3, it is essential to develop not only broadband infrastructure
but also to focus on training and attracting ICT specialists to support employment growth. At the
same time, policymakers should consider changes in consumer preferences related to e-commerce
to balance traditional and digital markets.</p>
          <p>To visualize and assess the quality of the models, graphs of the actual and predicted values were
constructed (Figure 5). These allow for the comparison of actual total employment values with
calculated ones, helping to identify systematic deviations or trends.</p>
          <p>The line of ideal fit prov ides a convenient reference point for evaluating the accuracy of the
models, allowing for easy identification of areas that may require improvement. These visualizations
also highlight the effectiveness of different clusters, which may be useful for further analysis and
decision-making.</p>
          <p>Multifactor regression analysis is an extremely important tool as it allows for the identification
of significant factors that influence employment in the context of digitalization. This method enables
the assessment of the contribution of each variable to the overall picture, highlighting those with the
most substantial impact. Identifying such variables creates a solid foundation for further impact
analysis, which can be used to build development scenarios and forecast potential labor market
outcomes. This approach allows for the development of more accurate strategies and their adaptation
to real-world conditions. With clear relationships among variables, analysts and policymakers can
more accurately predict which measures will yield the greatest benefits for employment growth in
each country or region. This facilitates the formulation of targeted strategies for optimizing digital
initiatives and enhancing management efficiency at the national level.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>According to the results of the regression analysis across all clusters, there is an observed influence
of digital transformation development on employment in European countries, but with varying
aspects depending on the specifics of each cluster. Countries grouped in Cluster 0, such as France
and Italy, demonstrate active implementation of e-services and a high level of digitalization, which
can positively impact the labor market and serve as examples of effective use of e-commerce to
stimulate it. However, less developed countries, such as Latvia and Hungary, may face challenges
due to underdeveloped digital infrastructure, particularly limited access to the internet. Cyprus and
the Czech Republic illustrate the importance of broadband access for increasing employment. The
analysis results for this cluster demonstrate that there is potential for development, but also
underscore the need for a strategic approach to the implementation of digital technologies.</p>
      <p>Cluster 1 consists of countries where a lower level of correlation between digital technologies and
overall employment has been detected compared to Cluster 0. They show diversity in the use of
digital technologies, indicating the need to consider the specific contexts of each country in
developing effective policies aimed at increasing employment through digitalization.</p>
      <p>Countries in Cluster 2 have strong prerequisites for developing a digital economy; however,
considering the specifics of each one when developing policies will promote employment growth
through digitalization.</p>
      <p>Countries in Cluster 3 should focus on training and attracting IT specialists as well as on
developing broadband infrastructure. Policymakers must take into account changes in consumer
preferences related to e-commerce to balance traditional and digital markets.</p>
      <p>The analysis results show that digitalization has a significant impact on employment across all
clusters; however, the specific contexts and challenges in each country require individualized policy
approaches. Countries should focus on developing digital technologies, e-commerce, and
infrastructure to enhance employment while considering their unique characteristics and needs.</p>
      <p>Thus, the impact of digital technologies on employment largely depends on the level of their
integration into the economy and incorporation into business processes. When countries actively
stimulate the development of e-commerce and increase the share of internet activities among the
population, it leads to the creation of new jobs and improved conditions in the labor market.
Conversely, if digital technologies do not receive sufficient attention from governments or are
underinvested in infrastructure, employment may remain low or even decline.</p>
      <p>In this context, countries with developed digital infrastructures should continue to invest in
technologies, particularly in the development of e-commerce, digital financial services, and access to
high-speed internet, which can enhance competitiveness in international markets and ensure stable
employment growth. Less developed countries need to focus on developing basic digital
infrastructure, including expanding access to broadband internet and improving the digital skills of
the population to maximize the potential of the digital economy for stimulating the labor market.</p>
      <p>Additionally, upskilling and training ICT specialists should become a priority for all countries, as
attracting highly qualified personnel in the ICT sector will strengthen the impact of digitalization on
economic development and employment. Strategic regulation and support for small and
mediumsized enterprises in the digital economy through state support programs and grant initiatives will
help bridge the digital divide between countries and accelerate the integration of digital technologies
into the business environment. These measures will enable countries to optimally leverage the
opportunities provided by digitalization to stimulate employment and sustainable economic growth.</p>
      <p>The authors have not employed any Generative AI tools.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>International</given-names>
            <surname>Telecommunication</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Union</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Statistics, (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). URI: https://www.itu.int/en/ITUD/Statistics/Pages/stat/default.aspx.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <article-title>Cloudflare 2023 Year in Review</article-title>
          . (
          <year>2023</year>
          ). URI: https://blog.cloudfare.com/radar-2023
          <string-name>
            <surname>-</surname>
          </string-name>
          year-inreview/.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>[3] The Future of Jobs Report</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          . (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). World Economic Forum. URI: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future
          <source>-of-jobs-report-2020/.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Acemoglu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Restrepo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Political Economy</source>
          .
          <volume>128</volume>
          :
          <issue>6</issue>
          ,
          <fpage>2188</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2244</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1086/705716.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Groen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lenaerts</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bosc</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Paguier</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Impact of digitalization and the ondemand economy on labour markets and the consequences for employment and industrial relations</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Economic and Social Committee</source>
          . URI: https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/qe-02-17-763
          <string-name>
            <surname>-</surname>
          </string-name>
          en-n.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>OECD</given-names>
            <surname>Digital Economy</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Outlook</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2015</year>
          . (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <source>OECD Publishing</source>
          , Paris, 15 July. URI: https://www.ecd.org/en/publications/oecd
          <article-title>-digital-economy-outlook-</article-title>
          <year>2015</year>
          _
          <fpage>9789264232440</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>en</lpage>
          .html.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smith</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Anderson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
          <article-title>AI, robotics, and the future of jobs</article-title>
          . Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C. URI: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/08/06/future-of-jobs/.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pena-Casas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ghailani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Coster</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The impact of digitalization on job quality in European public services. The case of homecare and employment service workers</article-title>
          .
          <source>Final report EPSU</source>
          . URI: https://www.epsu.org/sites/default/files/article/files/FINAL%20REPORT%
          <fpage>20EPSU</fpage>
          %
          <fpage>20DIGITALISATION</fpage>
          %
          <fpage>20</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>%</lpage>
          20OSE%
          <fpage>20June</fpage>
          %
          <fpage>202018</fpage>
          .pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sandri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alshyab</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shaban</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
          <source>The Effect of Digitalization on Unemployment Reduction. New Medit</source>
          .
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ). https://doi.org/10.30682/nm2204.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kolot</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Herasymenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shevchenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ryabokon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Employment in the coordinates of digital economy: current trends and foresight trajectories</article-title>
          .
          <source>Neuro-Fuzzy Modeling Techniques in Economics</source>
          ,
          <volume>11</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>78</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>123</lpage>
          . http://doi.org/10.33111/nfmte.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>078</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lederman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zouaidi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Incidence of the Digital Economy</article-title>
          and Frictional Unemployment:
          <source>International Evidence. Applied Economics</source>
          .
          <volume>54</volume>
          (
          <issue>51</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>16</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>2054927</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Santos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barbero</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Salotti</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Conte</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Job creation and destruction in the digital age: Assessing heterogeneous effects across European Union countries</article-title>
          . (
          <year>2023</year>
          ).
          <source>Economic Modelling</source>
          .
          <volume>126</volume>
          . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.
          <year>2023</year>
          .
          <volume>106405</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dziubanovska</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maslii</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Krysovatyy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Desyatnyuk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Drelich-Skulska</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ).
          <source>The Effects of Digital Economy on International Trade: An Empirical Analysis of EU Countries Panel Data. 2023 13th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT)</source>
          , Wrocław, Poland,
          <year>2023</year>
          ,
          <fpage>216</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>219</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/ACIT58437.
          <year>2023</year>
          .
          <volume>10275723</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yunxia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Neng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yechi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Effect of Digital Economy Development on Labor Employment</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Global Information Management</source>
          .
          <volume>31</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ). https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.321180.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Prytkova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Petit</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chaturvedi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ciarli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Employment Impact of Emerging Digital Technologies</article-title>
          . CESifo Working Paper №
          <fpage>10955</fpage>
          . URI: https://www.cesifo.org/en/publications/2024/working-paper/
          <article-title>employment-impact-emergingdigital-technologies.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <article-title>The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI)</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Commission</source>
          . URI: https://digitalstrategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eurostat</surname>
          </string-name>
          . URI: http://www.ec.europa.eu/.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>