This paper investigates the potential of blockchain technology to enhance corporate social responsibility (CSR) by increasing transparency, trust, and operational eficiency. From its early developments in the 1970s to the pivotal introduction of Bitcoin in 2008, blockchain ofers a decentralised, immutable framework ideal for CSR applications. The study reviews blockchain's architecture and key characteristics and examines CSR's multifaceted responsibilities and benefits. A literature review indicates blockchain can significantly improve supply chain transparency, CSR reporting accuracy, and sustainable business practices. Case studies in the fashion and agri-food industries illustrate practical applications. However, the study acknowledges challenges, including scalability, interoperability, integration complexity, and evolving regulatory landscapes. Future research should address these challenges, explore scalable blockchain solutions, and conduct empirical studies. This paper concludes that blockchain holds substantial promise for advancing CSR, fostering enhanced stakeholder engagement and ensuring authentic CSR activities.
Award from the Business Intelligence Group in 2022, providing $60 million in grants to over 400 U.S.
nonprofits focusing on social issues and committing to using 100% renewable electricity at its U.S. sites
by 2025 [
The primary research question, therefore, is how blockchain technology can be applied to enhance corporate social responsibility. Exploring this intersection could yield significant benefits, leveraging the strengths of blockchain to address and improve CSR eforts, ensuring transparent, immutable, and eficient practices in the corporate world.
Following an introduction that provides insights into blockchain and corporate social responsibility,
the remainder of the paper is structured as follows. The second chapter, Theoretical Foundations,
explores the available literature and related research on blockchain technology and corporate social
responsibility. The third chapter reviews the applications of blockchain in corporate social responsibility.
The paper concludes with a summary.
2. The Theoretical Foundations
Blockchain, as the name suggests, denotes a chain of blocks, where blocks represent and contain data,
and the chain refers to how the blocks are interconnected [
Blockchain technology has numerous characteristics that place it at the forefront of today’s technologies. According to [10], Table 1 provides an overview.
Before explaining how blockchain works in an example, Fig. 2 presents the architecture of blockchain in three layers. The first layer visible in the figure below belongs to the application layer, which includes the wallet and is the layer through which end users execute their transactions. The second layer pertains to the decentralised ledger, which is responsible for grouping transactions, also known as mining. The ifnal third layer is the peer-to-peer network, where node types play diferent roles, and various messages are exchanged to maintain the decentralised ledger.
The functioning of blockchain will now be explained using the example in Fig. 3. Suppose person A intends to send one Bitcoin (one of the cryptocurrencies) to person B. The first step is initiating this transaction, represented as a block with the structure described above in the second step. In the third step, this block, or the newly created transaction, is broadcast to all participants in the network. Per [12], nodes are individual computers within the blockchain network that validate and relay transactions. If all nodes validate this transaction (noting that the transaction can be rejected), this block will be Users can generate addresses that do not reveal their real identities.
Easy verification of transactions: Bitcoin uses UTXO (an unspent transaction output) to track transaction history.
All participants see the same version of the distributed ledger.
All nodes must agree on the validity of a transaction.
There is no need for a central authority; consensus algorithms maintain network integrity.
Peer-to-peer network with no single point of failure; network functions despite node failures.
Transactions cannot be tampered with; errors require new transactions to correct them.
Transactions are quickly verified and dificult to reverse or erase once recorded.
Participants can trace the lineage of any asset on the blockchain. appended to the chain of previous blocks. Adding a block to the chain, known as mining, involves nodes solving complex cryptographic puzzles to confirm and secure the transactions [ 13, 10]. In the ifnal step, the transaction is executed, and the Bitcoin is transferred from person A to person B.
Although there are numerous divisions, the paper will focus on one that occurs in all variants and represents the core diferentiation of blockchain. This division distinguishes four blockchains: public, private, permissionless, and permissioned. A public blockchain is open to everyone; anyone can join, whereas in private blockchains, entry is controlled by membership and such blockchains are restricted and limited to business networks [15]. In permissionless blockchains, there are no constraints placed on participants, but in contrast, permissioned blockchains are confined to a specific group of users who are assigned identities through certificate issuance [8, 16].
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) represents a comprehensive framework that integrates a variety of activities and duties within a corporate context. It is characterised by the voluntary adoption of environmental and social goals in a company’s stakeholder interactions and operational practices, as described by Barbieri da Rosa [17]. This framework is dedicated to equitable growth and sustainable development, as Fatima & Elbanna [18] highlighted and acknowledged the corporation’s role within broader societal networks [19]. CSR entails that a company remains socially accountable to itself, its stakeholders, and the public, extending beyond its legal, ethical, and financial duties [ 20]. CSR can manifest in numerous forms, from philanthropic endeavours to strategic initiatives designed to align business operations with broader societal goals. This may include eforts to reduce environmental impact through sustainable resource management, initiatives to promote social equity within the workplace and the wider community and the adoption of transparent governance practices to build trust and accountability [21, 22]. Sustainability, accountability, and transparency are central to CSR, guiding companies to create value for shareholders and society [19]. Gordon Fitch’s [23] definition of corporate social responsibility encapsulates its essence: "Corporate social responsibility is defined as the serious attempt to solve social problems caused wholly or in part by the corporation." This definition underscores corporations’ critical role in addressing societal challenges and emphasises the importance of proactive engagement in social problem-solving. In conclusion, CSR is not merely a set of add-on activities but a fundamental approach to conducting business that recognises the interconnectedness of economic, social and environmental factors.
CSR encompasses various responsibilities, including environmental, ethical, philanthropic, and financial obligations. Environmental responsibility extends beyond compliance with legal requirements, encompassing proactive measures such as exceeding regulatory standards and integrating environmental considerations into business operations and product development [20]. Ethical responsibility involves the firm’s duty to society, stakeholders, and the environment, necessitating a balance between immediate financial returns and long-term sustainable development [ 24]. Philanthropic responsibility refers to the voluntary initiatives firms undertake to benefit society, such as community development projects and charitable contributions [25, 26]). As an integral aspect of CSR, financial responsibility includes the firm’s economic performance and integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into financial decision-making processes [ 27, 28]. These diverse responsibilities are interconnected, forming the foundation for sustainable and ethical business practices. Environmental, ethical, philanthropic, and financial responsibilities are not isolated silos but rather interdependent elements that collectively contribute to a company’s long-term viability and positive societal impact. By integrating these responsibilities, firms can navigate the complexities of modern business environments, fostering resilience and promoting a more equitable and sustainable global economy [29]. The holistic approach to CSR underscores the importance of aligning business strategies with broader societal goals, ensuring that companies achieve economic success and contribute meaningfully to social and environmental well-being. This comprehensive CSR perspective highlights businesses’ evolving role in addressing global challenges and underscores the critical importance of responsible corporate conduct in today’s interconnected world.
CSR provides businesses with numerous advantages, including an enhanced reputation, increased customer loyalty and improved financial stability [ 30]. Additionally, CSR can elevate organisational performance, boost profitability and ofer a competitive edge [ 31, 32, 33]. Ultimately, CSR is a strategic necessity that generates value, aligns businesses with societal expectations and fosters a healthier and more sustainable environment [34, 35]. By adopting CSR initiatives, companies can drive eficiency, particularly in non-competitive industries, while positively impacting the environment [36, 37]. 3. Blockchain Application In Corporate Social Responsibility The use of blockchain technology in the field of CSR provides a substantial opportunity to improve managerial practices by increasing transparency, trust, and operational eficiency. Managers face increasing pressure to develop sustainable business models and demonstrate the credibility of their CSR initiatives. Blockchain technology provides a decentralised and immutable platform for improving crucial operations such as supply chain transparency and CSR reporting accuracy.
From a managerial standpoint, blockchain technology builds confidence among stakeholders by providing verifiable and tamper-proof data, which is critical for establishing organisational legitimacy. It also enables managers to optimise operations, lowering administrative costs and expediting decisionmaking processes. Practical applications in the fashion and agri-food industries demonstrate how blockchain is used to assess product sustainability and assure ethical compliance. Nonetheless, managers face many obstacles, including technological scalability, system interoperability, integration complexity, and the need to react to changing regulatory environments. Purchasing scalable blockchain solutions and educating staf members to ensure successful implementation are two important suggestions for managers.
Studies highlight the growing necessity for transparency in supply chain governance to meet social sustainability goals. For instance, Venkatesh et al. in [38] emphasised the critical role of transparency in this domain, while Winkelmann et al. demonstrated that blockchain is the most widely used technology for sustainability within supply chains [39]. Ltifi and Mesfar [ 40] identified a positive correlation between blockchain-based CSR services and consumer attitudes and resilience. Similarly, Ronaghi and Mosakhani [41] confirmed that blockchain adoption positively impacts business ethics, corporate governance, and social sustainability.
In the following, Table 2 presents an overview of the studies, detailing the paper title, DOI, publication year, and a description of the main findings. For this research, the Web of Science database was searched using the query "corporate social responsibility" + "blockchain" in the topic field, which searches the title, abstract, and author keywords. The initial search yielded 36 studies. After reading the abstracts, those that did not align with the topic were excluded. Ultimately, the table contains 11 studies. This assessment of the literature provides scholars and managers alike with a basic understanding of blockchain’s possibilities in CSR. R B t
l S .
y C t s li e i
b n a r
n t a h ia u c
n t b e s a n s
u , akn lisa b c E s
o a A d
n t U n a g m so co p lb t n n g
a e n fic e
i d e i n
w g t s e
b y a i i b a fir e n c
p s i m sh n o o a c it
a y l d d e
u r an ts e y e th c h n re .
T g n i m p r s e t a i d e n i v e a o o e n r i
t s h p i v ch k
, - se e s iv s t
e c c fe o e r e p h n t
o g i
t in c c u n d ahn rop e g y in b s
i s ie im t t i v p it o c ,
s a t
c R a S p C
m t i ro la pp tn .t u e n s
m e n n m a o e c r g
i y v a o en an g l o g m n e n h i c c s r e s
e u t
s o in s s a a re ch in g k t in c lo en lis b m an s o t i w s o se
a h s r s
A d e ss le n
a u cy ,s
C ts c s i d e
f r i e ap f
L g
n o ic p e ss u h e ed T n r o c 1 2 0 2
2 / 9 g / 2 c i o s l u B b
e c i n n h ra s d d c p c o p o l u l B s b a a T p p C e t
c c o S fe e 3 2 0 2
o 9 :s .
i 0 1 / 5 g / 5 r
This study illustrates that blockchain technology ofers substantial benefits for advancing corporate social responsibility (CSR) by promoting transparency, trust, and eficiency in various business processes. A detailed review of the literature and analysis of case studies shows that blockchain can significantly enhance the accuracy and reliability of CSR reporting, improve supply chain transparency and support sustainable business practices. The findings show that blockchain’s immutable and decentralised nature ensures the authenticity of CSR activities, thereby fostering stakeholder engagement and trust. Key examples from the literature, such as the use of blockchain for supply chain transparency in the fashion industry and blockchain-based initiatives in agri-food supply chains, highlight this technology’s practical applications and potential in CSR. These case studies demonstrate how blockchain can help company managers maintain ethical sourcing practices, ensure fair labour conditions, and enhance environmental sustainability.
Despite the promising potential of blockchain in CSR, this study acknowledges several limitations. Firstly, the primary data used in this research were sourced from the Web of Science database, which may not comprehensively cover all relevant studies and insights on the topic. This limitation highlights the need for a more extensive database search in future research. Additionally, the adoption of blockchain technology is still in its early stages, and significant technical challenges related to scalability and interoperability need to be addressed. Integrating blockchain into existing corporate infrastructures can also be complex and costly, posing a barrier to widespread adoption. Furthermore, the regulatory environment for blockchain technology is still evolving, creating uncertainties for companies seeking to implement blockchain-based CSR initiatives.
Future research should focus on overcoming the technical and regulatory challenges associated with blockchain adoption in CSR. Exploring scalable and interoperable blockchain solutions will be crucial for broader implementation. It would also be valuable to conduct empirical studies focusing on the Serbian region, examining how companies integrate blockchain technology into their CSR eforts. Investigating the specific challenges and opportunities faced by Serbian companies in this context can provide deeper insights and practical recommendations. Longitudinal studies tracking the impact of blockchain on CSR performance over time would also be beneficial, providing a clearer picture of its efectiveness and sustainability. By addressing these areas, future research can contribute to the development of robust frameworks for integrating blockchain into CSR practices, ensuring that its benefits are fully realised for both businesses and society.
Declaration on Generative AI The authors have not employed any Generative AI tools. [7] D. Yaga, P. Mell, N. Roby, K. Scarfone, Blockchain technology overview, arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.11078 (2019). [8] H. Sheth, J. Dattani, Overview of blockchain technology, Asian Journal For Convergence In
Technology (AJCT) (2019). [9] Q. Wang, M. Su, Integrating blockchain technology into the energy sector—from theory of blockchain to research and application of energy blockchain, Computer Science Review 37 (2020) 100275. [10] G. Habib, S. Sharma, S. Ibrahim, I. Ahmad, S. Qureshi, M. Ishfaq, Blockchain technology: benefits, challenges, applications, and integration of blockchain technology with cloud computing, Future Internet 14 (2022) 341. [11] S. S. Sarmah, Understanding blockchain technology, Computer Science and Engineering 8 (2018) 23–29. [12] J. Yli-Huumo, D. Ko, S. Choi, S. Park, K. Smolander, Where is current research on blockchain technology?—a systematic review, PloS one 11 (2016) e0163477. [13] P. De Filippi, M. Mannan, W. Reijers, The alegality of blockchain technology, Policy and Society 41 (2022) 358–372. [14] S. Rajput, A. Singh, S. Khurana, T. Bansal, S. Shreshtha, Blockchain technology and cryptocurrenices, in: 2019 Amity international conference on artificial intelligence (AICAI), IEEE, 2019, pp. 909–912. [15] R. Paulavičius, S. Grigaitis, A. Igumenov, E. Filatovas, A decade of blockchain: review of the current status, challenges, and future directions, Informatica 30 (2019) 729–748. [16] C. V. Helliar, L. Crawford, L. Rocca, C. Teodori, M. Veneziani, Permissionless and permissioned blockchain difusion, International Journal of Information Management 54 (2020) 102136. [17] L. A. B. da Rosa, M. C. Martins-Rodrigues, T. P. Godoy, W. Y. Y. Z. Campos, C. M. Gomes, L. C.
Barbieri, Corporate social responsibility: The comparison of scientific production in web of science and in scopus over the last three decades (1988-2018), in: Conceptual and Theoretical Approaches to Corporate Social Responsibility, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Financial Performance, IGI Global, 2020, pp. 49–75. [18] T. Fatima, S. Elbanna, Corporate social responsibility (csr) implementation: A review and a research agenda towards an integrative framework, Journal of Business Ethics 183 (2023) 105–121. [19] M. A. Al-Shammari, S. N. Banerjee, A. A. Rasheed, Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: A theory of dual responsibility, Management Decision 60 (2022) 1513–1540. [20] A. McWilliams, Corporate social responsibility, 2020. [21] I. Sánchez-Torné, J. C. Morán-Álvarez, J. A. Pérez-López, The importance of corporate social responsibility in achieving high corporate reputation, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27 (2020) 2692–2700. [22] T. Islam, R. Islam, A. H. Pitafi, L. Xiaobei, M. Rehmani, M. Irfan, M. S. Mubarak, The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust, Sustainable Production and Consumption 25 (2021) 123–135. [23] H. G. Fitch, Achieving corporate social responsibility, Academy of management review 1 (1976) 38–46. [24] B. Schiopoiu, M. Nastase, R. Dobrea, Ethical csr, Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility.
Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Doi 10 (2013) 978–3. [25] D. Giovannucci, O. von Hagen, J. Wozniak, Corporate social responsibility and the role of voluntary sustainability standards, in: Voluntary standard systems: A contribution to sustainable development, Springer, 2014, pp. 359–384. [26] A. B. Carroll, Corporate social responsibility: The centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks., Organizational dynamics (2015). [27] M. S. Aßländer, Corporate social responsibility as subsidiary co-responsibility: A macroeconomic perspective, Journal of business ethics 99 (2011) 115–128. [28] H. Liang, L. Renneboog, Corporate social responsibility and sustainable finance: A review of the literature, European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper (2020). [29] B. L. Parmar, R. E. Freeman, J. S. Harrison, A. C. Wicks, L. Purnell, S. De Colle, Stakeholder theory:
The state of the art, Academy of Management Annals 4 (2010) 403–445. [30] S. A. Orekhov, S. P. Ivanova, The concept and evolution of corporate social responsibility, Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (2018) 131–138. [31] L. E. V. Juarez, Corporate social responsibility: Its efects on smes, J. Mgmt. & Sustainability 7 (2017) 75. [32] O. P. Omoyebagbe, O. Onyebuchi, O. O. Obafemi, Corporate social responsibility and organizational performance: A theoretical review, International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Research 8 (2023) 12–21. [33] A. A. Mohammad, Positive outcomes of corporate social responsibility for companies and society,
IIIARD International Journal of Economics and Business Management 10 (2024) 74–87. [34] J. Lu, L. Ren, W. Lin, Y. He, J. Streimikis, Policies to promote corporate social responsibility (csr) and assessment of csr impacts, E+M Ekonomie a Management 22 (2019) 82–98. [35] A. Nicolaides, Corporate social responsibility as an ethical imperative, Athens JL 4 (2018) 285. [36] C. Newman, J. Rand, F. Tarp, N. Trifkovic, Corporate social responsibility in a competitive business environment, The Journal of Development Studies 56 (2020) 1455–1472. [37] A. Hunjet, V. Jurinić, D. Vuković, Environmental impact of corporate social responsibility, in: SHS
Web of Conferences, volume 92, EDP Sciences, 2021, p. 06013. [38] V. Venkatesh, K. Kang, B. Wang, R. Y. Zhong, A. Zhang, System architecture for blockchain based transparency of supply chain social sustainability, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 63 (2020) 101896. [39] S. Winkelmann, R. Guennoun, F. Möller, T. Schoormann, H. van der Valk, Back to a resilient future: Digital technologies for a sustainable supply chain, Information Systems and e-Business Management (2024) 1–36. [40] M. Ltifi, S. Mesfar, Does the corporate social responsibility of the service based on blockchain technology afect the real behaviour of the consumer?, Journal of Air Transport Management 104 (2022) 102256. [41] M. H. Ronaghi, M. Mosakhani, The efects of blockchain technology adoption on business ethics and social sustainability: evidence from the middle east, Environment, Development and Sustainability 24 (2022) 6834–6859.