<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Deep Learning Formal Models: A Bibliometric Exploration</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Angham Boukhari</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Aïcha Choutri</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Faiza Belala</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ahmed Hadj Kacem</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Riad Helal</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Constantine 2-Abdelhamid Mehri, LIRE Laboratory</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>BP: 67A, Constantine</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DZ">Algeria</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Sfax, ReDCAD Laboratory</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>BP 1088, 3018 Sfax</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="TN">Tunisia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The growing field of Deep Learning (DL) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) has seen significant advancements in recent years, particularly in the application of Formal Models to improve system performance and reliability. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis using data from Scopus to explore trends in formal analysis and formal verification of DNN, which are essential for safety-critical applications such as healthcare and autonomous systems. Python and R were employed for data extraction, processing, and visualization. The results emphasize increasing interest in the field, highlight prominent authors, significant author collaborations, key publications, and trends in keywords and research topics. These findings, visualized through tables and graphs, provide insights into the current research landscape and ofer guidance for future studies on integrating formal models with DL.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Bibliometric Analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>Deep Learning</kwd>
        <kwd>Deep Neural Networks</kwd>
        <kwd>Formal Models</kwd>
        <kwd>Performance</kwd>
        <kwd>Formal Analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>Formal Verification</kwd>
        <kwd>Scopus</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>1. How has research on formal models in Deep Learning evolved in terms of annual scientific growth
and contributing countries?
2. Who are the most influential authors in this field, and which institutions produce the most work?
3. What are the most frequent keywords and the main trends of recent years?
4. How do collaborations between authors take place?</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Formal Models in Deep Learning: Bibliometric Analysis</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1. Definitions</title>
        <p>
          Formal models are mathematical frameworks used to rigorously describe and analyze systems to ensure
their correctness and reliability. In the context of DNN and DL, formal models are increasingly applied
to address challenges related to robustness, interpretability, and safety. These models are used for tasks
such as probabilistic models, graphical models, and logic-based models, each of which serves distinct
purposes.
1. Probabilistic Models: These models, particularly Bayesian networks and other probabilistic
graphical models, are used to represent uncertainty and complex dependencies in deep learning tasks.
Methods like variational inference and Monte Carlo enhance model robustness and generalization,
especially by integrating probabilistic reasoning into neural networks [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ].
2. Graphical Models: including Markov Random Fields (MRFs) and Hidden Markov Models (HMMs)
are crucial for structured prediction tasks like image segmentation and sequence labeling. They enable
neural networks to manage relationships between random variables, enhancing their handling of
structured data and complex dependencies [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ]
3. Logic-based models: refer to formal approaches that utilize logical systems to represent and analyze
complex interactions among components. These models facilitate the simulation and prediction of
signaling network behavior based on logical rules rather than traditional mathematical equations [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>Formal models in DL enhance the robustness, interpretability, and reliability of neural networks
across various applications. They employ probabilistic and logic-based methods to validate models,
assess behavior, and quantify prediction uncertainties while ensuring adherence to safety constraints.
These models are crucial for decision-making tasks in robotics and autonomous systems, helping handle
diverse data sources and improving generalization across diferent use cases, especially in safety-critical
domains like autonomous vehicles and healthcare.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2. Recent Advances</title>
        <p>
          Data Sources: Scopus has become a leading bibliometric database, ofering extensive coverage across
disciplines and superior citation tracking—approximately 20 % more than Web of Science [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ]. Its
advanced analytical tools and consistent citation data outperform free databases like Google Scholar,
PubMed, Dimensions, and Lens.org, which often lack complete metadata [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref12 ref13">11, 12, 13</xref>
          ]. Scopus also
provides detailed metadata, including citation networks, author information, and article references, and
is regularly updated to include the latest publications. These features make it indispensable for rigorous
bibliometric analyses and high-quality academic research [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>2.3. Search Strategy</title>
        <p>To gather recent publications on deep learning, formal models, and neural networks, we used the Scopus
indexing database, renowned for its broad academic coverage. The search terms aligned with the study’s
objectives, targeting research that integrates deep learning, formal models, and performance evaluation.
The query executed was: ("Deep Learning" OR "DL") AND ("Deep Neural Network*" OR "DNN*") AND
(("Performance") OR ("Formal Models" AND ("Formal analysis" OR "Formal Verification"))), yielding
16,207 documents across 46 columns.</p>
        <p>Filters ensured relevance and novelty by limiting the period to 2017–2024 and including all subject
areas to capture interdisciplinary contributions. Only peer-reviewed articles and journals in English
were considered to maintain reliability and comparability, given that around 80% of academic articles
are published in English, which dominates global research trends. Scopus’s focus on English further
ensured uniformity and accessibility.</p>
        <p>
          The database was processed using a Python script [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ]. Certain columns with irrelevant metadata were
removed, including ’Molecular Sequence Numbers’, ’Chemicals/CAS’, ’Tradenames’, ’Manufacturers’,
’Funding Details’, ’Editors’, ’Sponsors’, ’Conference name’, ’Conference date’, ’Conference location’,
’Conference code’, ’ISBN’. The ’Molecular Sequence Numbers’ column, for instance, was excluded as it
did not contribute meaningful information to the analysis of trends in formal models applied to deep
learning. Missing values were addressed by filling them in where feasible, and columns with over 90%
missing values were eliminated. Duplicates were identified by title or DOI and removed. After cleaning,
the dataset contained 16,205 documents across 34 columns.
        </p>
        <p>Subsequently, we analyzed publication trends to track the evolution of interest in formal models and
deep learning. We identified influential authors, examined collaboration networks, and highlighted key
research groups and contributors.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>2.4. Data Analysis</title>
        <p>
          The data was processed using a Python script, which played a crucial role in conducting the analysis
by taking the collected data as input and leveraging various libraries and functions to facilitate data
processing and preparation. Subsequently, the analyses were performed using R software, specifically
with the Bibliometrix and Biblioshiny packages [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ]. These analyses allowed for a comprehensive
examination of various aspects, including the evolution of scientific production in the field, identification
of the most frequently cited articles, and recognition of the most influential authors and their main
contributions. Additionally, the analysis explored the geographic distribution of prolific authors and
highlighted the contributions and relative impact of diferent countries. The study further identified
the most active and highly cited research institutions across the dataset, providing valuable insights
into collaborative networks within the field. Moreover, the analysis mapped the key partnerships and
central hubs of the global research network.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Comparative Analysis</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Annual Scientific Production</title>
        <p>The graph in figure 1 shows a significant increase in scientific production in the field of formal models
applied to DNN and DL between 2017 and 2023, with an estimate for 2024. The growth is particularly
notable between 2017 and 2021, rising from 231 to 2,643 articles, reflecting a growing interest in this
expanding field. From 2021 to 2023, the number of publications stabilizes around 3,200 articles, with
a peak in 2023 at 3,283 articles. This stabilization suggests a certain maturity in the field, although
the estimate for 2024 (3,125 articles) indicates a slight decline. This could point to a temporary shift
in focus towards other subfields or a minor decrease in activity within the domain. Overall, the trend
highlights that formal models are playing an increasingly important role in improving performance
and verifying neural networks, particularly in critical applications. In total, the dataset includes 16,205
publications, underscoring the substantial volume of research dedicated to this area over the past years.
Table 1 highlights the top 10 most cited articles related to the specified topic, selected from a total of
16,205 records in the dataset:</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2. Most relevant Authors</title>
        <p>The diagram presented in Figure 2 shows that Zhang Y, Wang Y, and Li Y are the most prolific authors
in the field of DNN and DL, each having published over 300 articles, likely on topics such as DNN
architectures and optimization methods. Other authors, such as Wang J, Li X, and Wang X, also
contribute significantly with 200 to 250 publications. The strong presence of Chinese researchers with
similar names may indicate potential collaborations. Their work covers various aspects, revealing
trends such as the improvement of DNN performance and the exploration of unsupervised learning.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>3.3. Authors’ Production over Time</title>
        <p>The chart in figure 3 illustrates the scientific output of the top ten authors working on the application
of formal models to DNN from 2017 to 2024. Certain authors, such as Wang X and Zhang J, stand
out for their particularly high productivity and significant recognition of their work, as shown by the
numerous citations they receive. Wang X, for instance, experienced a major peak in 2021, suggesting a
key contribution during that period. Other authors, like Li Y and Zhang Y, show more modest output,
possibly indicating specialization in specific subfields. Overall, the consistent scientific output in this
area reflects the ongoing growth of research on DNNs, highlighting the importance of these authors’
contributions to developing robust and reliable methods for these technologies. Their work has a
significant influence on the community, and the field is rapidly expanding with continuous innovations.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>3.4. High-Frequency Terms</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>3.5. Words’ Frequency over Time</title>
        <p>In this comprehensive analysis, our main objective was to study the changing trends in interest in
DL-related topics by ranking keyword frequencies by year. Notably, “deep learning” emerged as the
predominant keyword, although it was intentionally excluded from the main objective of this study.
Our aim was to shed light on other keywords associated with it. For a detailed analysis of our results,
please refer to Figure 4 for the revealed results.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-6">
        <title>3.6. Leading Afiliations</title>
        <p>The analysis in Figure 5 highlights the most relevant university afiliations in terms of scientific output.
Tsinghua University leads with 550 articles, followed by Zhejiang University with 513. These two
institutions clearly dominate research production. Next are the University of Electronic Science and
Technology of China and Xidian University, with 452 and 441 articles, respectively. Other universities,
such as Huazhong, Shanghai Jiao Tong, and Wuhan, also stand out with between 392 and 426 articles.
Lastly, Beihang, Southeast, and Sichuan universities round out the list, each contributing around 350
articles. The data emphasizes how scientific output is concentrated in a few dominant universities.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-7">
        <title>3.7. Country Distribution of Authors</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-8">
        <title>3.8. Trend topics</title>
        <p>The analysis presented in image 7 highlights the rise of Transformers, particularly after 2021, in
natural language processing and machine learning. Contrastive learning is also becoming a major
topic, reducing reliance on labeled data and improving model eficiency, especially in computer vision.
The use of large datasets is rapidly expanding, but it poses challenges in terms of management and
energy eficiency. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) remain relevant, Transformers appear
to outperform them in several tasks. Finally, a focus on integrating CNNs and Transformers, as well as
optimizing performance while minimizing environmental impact, could be key moving forward.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-9">
        <title>3.9. Collaboration Network</title>
        <p>This graph (Figure 8) presents the final output of the collaboration network analysis conducted in R
using the Biblioshiny tool. The network reveals a core-periphery structure, where authors like "Zhang
Y," "Wang Y," and "Li J" act as central "hubs" with numerous connections, indicating their prominence
in the field. Meanwhile, a small isolated group, represented in red, is disconnected from the main
network. This visualization captures the dynamics of scientific collaboration, with a dense core of
highly interconnected researchers surrounded by peripheral, less-connected authors. Common names,
such as "Wang" and "Li," posed challenges in distinguishing individual authors, but the structure still
provides valuable insights into collaborative relationships. Due to the dataset’s large size, it could not
be imported into VOSviewer, highlighting Biblioshiny’s efectiveness in handling extensive data for
visualizations like this.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-10">
        <title>3.10. Comparison with Existing Studies</title>
        <p>
          Our findings align with previous studies highlighting the growing importance of formal models in
enhancing the robustness, interpretability, and safety of deep learning (DL) systems, particularly in
ifelds such as healthcare and autonomous systems. For instance, the work by Chen et al. (2018),
which developed the DeepLab model for semantic segmentation, demonstrates how the use of atrous
convolution improves spatial accuracy [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ]. Furthermore, their research highlights significant advances
in the ability of models to extract fine details without substantially increasing the number of parameters.
In contrast to these approaches, our analysis shows that the integration of formal models not only
improves this accuracy but also strengthens the robustness of the systems. The work of Shorten
et al. (2019) on data augmentation, notably through the use of GANs, confirms the importance of
adopting sophisticated strategies to ensure model generalizability [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
          ]. Similarly, Zhang et al. (2017),
with their DnCNN model for image denoising, emphasize the efectiveness of residual techniques in
improving network performance [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
          ]. Moreover, the evolution of CNN architectures towards deeper
networks, as shown by Gu et al. (2018) with ResNet, addresses gradient issues efectively, supporting our
observations on the impact of residual connections [20]. Additionally, Alzubaidi et al. (2021) highlighted
the dominance of modern CNN architectures in complex applications [21]. Our study extends this
analysis by demonstrating the importance of formal models in various contexts. Kamnitsas et al. (2017)
introduced a multi-scale 3D CNN model for brain lesion segmentation, illustrating the importance of
multi-scale contexts [22]. This approach supports our analysis, which integrates contextual information
to enhance precision. Finally, Hannun et al. (2019) proved the efectiveness of deep neural networks
(DNN) in arrhythmia classification with a high AUC score [ 26]. Our study also supports this approach
by emphasizing how formal models can enhance predictive performance in critical medical applications.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.1. Results</title>
        <p>The research questions outlined in the introduction have been thoroughly explored through the study’s
ifndings. Below is an analysis linking each question with its respective answer:</p>
        <p>Q1: How has research on formal models in Deep Learning evolved in terms of annual scientific
growth and contributing countries?
R1: Research on formal models within the deep learning domain has shown substantial growth,
particularly between 2017 and 2021, indicating increased global attention. By 2023, a phase of stabilization
occurred, pointing to the field’s maturity and the necessity for innovative directions or emerging
subfields to catalyze further advancements. Leading contributors include China, the U.S., and key
European nations, reflecting considerable research funding and focus in these regions.</p>
        <p>Q2: Who are the most influential authors in this field, and which institutions produce the most work?
R2: Influential figures such as Zhang Y., Wang Y., and Li Y. have made significant and consistent
contributions. Institutions like Tsinghua University and Zhejiang University are notable for their
prolific output and extensive research partnerships, enhancing their strong positions within the field.
This highlights their leadership in producing impactful research and fostering influential academic
collaborations.</p>
        <p>Q3: What are the most frequent keywords and main trends of recent years?
R3: Commonly recurring terms include "Deep Learning" and "Deep Neural Networks," which continue
to dominate the landscape. However, there has been an increased emphasis on emerging keywords such
as "transformers" and "contrastive learning," highlighting new strategies for handling large datasets and
improving model performance. Transformers, with their attention mechanism, allow parallel sequence
processing, enhancing speed and eficiency, especially in NLP tasks like translation [ 27]. This innovation
extends to fields such as computer vision. Contrastive learning improves data representation and model
generalization without needing extensive labeled data, reflecting the field’s adaptation to technological
challenges [28].</p>
        <p>Q4: How do collaborations between authors take place?
R4: Author collaborations tend to be predominantly national, with a strong concentration in China,
illustrating a focus on bolstering domestic research networks. This shift from earlier, broader international
collaborations indicates a strategic emphasis on regional research independence and focus.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>4.2. Biases and Limitations</title>
        <p>Several obstacles have impacted the quality of our analysis. While the Scopus database is comprehensive
and widely recognized, it has inherent limitations. For instance, it may not encompass all relevant
publications, particularly those in emerging or niche journals, leading to selection bias and limited
coverage diversity. Additionally, comparisons with other databases like Web of Science and Google
Scholar reveal that Scopus may prioritize specific fields, potentially skewing research findings.
Keywordbased search strategies may exclude pertinent studies that use diferent terminologies, introducing
language bias and restricting analysis scope. Moreover, unintended biases in interpreting results should
be considered. Emphasizing specific emerging keywords might highlight current trends but not fully
represent the broader academic landscape. Despite measures taken to minimize these biases, they
can afect the generalizability and robustness of conclusions. A broader analysis involving multiple
databases and more inclusive search strategies could help mitigate these limitations.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>Formal models applied to Deep Learning (DL) and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) have gained significant
attention in recent years for their potential to enhance system robustness, interpretability, and reliability.
Given the wide range of applications and the rapid pace of technological progress in this field, it can be
challenging to cover these developments comprehensively through traditional narrative reviews.</p>
      <p>Our bibliometric analysis provides a detailed overview of the evolution of publications on formal
models in DL, highlighting their contributions to system validation and performance improvement.
Leveraging Python for data extraction and processing, and R with the Bibliometrix package for analysis,
we visualized key trends, collaborative networks, and the influence of major contributors in the field.
This approach ofers a holistic view of the landscape and identifies critical research hubs and influential
authors.</p>
      <p>In light of the growing significance of formal models, we recommend that future research continues to
explore this domain, with particular focus on interdisciplinary approaches. Emerging techniques, such
as transformers and contrastive learning, present promising opportunities to address current challenges,
including enhanced model validation and energy eficiency. Future studies should investigate how
formal models can integrate with these methods to boost robustness and performance, particularly in
critical fields like healthcare and autonomous systems.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Acknowledgment</title>
      <p>This work was partially supported by the LABEX-TA project MeFoGL: "Méthode Formelles pour le
Génie Logiciel"</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT and DeepL Writer in order to: Perform
grammar and spelling checks. Further, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes
full responsibility for the publication’s content.
of deep cnn for image denoising, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 26 (2017) 3142–3155.
doi:10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206.
[20] J. Gu, Z. Wang, J. Kuen, L. Ma, A. Shahroudy, B. Shuai, T. Liu, X. Wang, G. Wang, J. Cai, et al.,</p>
      <p>Recent advances in convolutional neural networks, Pattern recognition 77 (2018) 354–377.
[21] L. Alzubaidi, J. Zhang, A. J. Humaidi, A. Al-Dujaili, Y. Duan, O. Al-Shamma, J. Santamaría, M. A.</p>
      <p>Fadhel, M. Al-Amidie, L. Farhan, Review of deep learning: concepts, cnn architectures, challenges,
applications, future directions, Journal of big Data 8 (2021) 1–74.
[22] K. Kamnitsas, C. Ledig, V. F. Newcombe, J. P. Simpson, A. D. Kane, D. K. Menon, D.
Rueckert, B. Glocker, Eficient multi-scale 3d cnn with fully connected crf for accurate brain lesion
segmentation, Medical image analysis 36 (2017) 61–78.
[23] A. Mathis, P. Mamidanna, K. M. Cury, T. Abe, V. N. Murthy, M. W. Mathis, M. Bethge, Deeplabcut:
markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning, Nature neuroscience
21 (2018) 1281–1289.
[24] H. Ismail Fawaz, G. Forestier, J. Weber, L. Idoumghar, P.-A. Muller, Deep learning for time series
classification: a review, Data mining and knowledge discovery 33 (2019) 917–963.
[25] A. Khan, A. Sohail, U. Zahoora, A. S. Qureshi, A survey of the recent architectures of deep
convolutional neural networks, Artificial intelligence review 53 (2020) 5455–5516.
[26] A. Y. Hannun, P. Rajpurkar, M. Haghpanahi, G. H. Tison, C. Bourn, M. P. Turakhia, A. Y. Ng,
Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using
a deep neural network, Nature medicine 25 (2019) 65–69.
[27] R. Hanslo, Deep learning transformer architecture for named-entity recognition on low-resourced
languages: State of the art results, in: 2022 17th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence
Systems (FedCSIS), IEEE, 2022, pp. 53–60.
[28] C.-Y. Chuang, J. Robinson, Y.-C. Lin, A. Torralba, S. Jegelka, Debiased contrastive learning,
Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020) 8765–8775.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Raj</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>On the origin of deep learning</article-title>
          ,
          <source>arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.07800</source>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Kumar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. B. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Manash</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Deep learning: A branch of machine learning</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series</source>
          , volume
          <volume>1228</volume>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>IOP</given-names>
            <surname>Publishing</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          , p.
          <fpage>012045</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Hatcher</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Yu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A survey of deep learning: Platforms, applications and emerging research trends</article-title>
          ,
          <source>IEEE access 6</source>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <fpage>24411</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>24432</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Miikkulainen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Liang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Meyerson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Rawal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Fink</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Francon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Raju</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Shahrzad</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Navruzyan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Dufy</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Evolving deep neural networks, in: Artificial intelligence in the age of neural networks and brain computing</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Elsevier</source>
          ,
          <year>2024</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>269</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>287</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Feng</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Formal Models of Neural Network and Deep Learning</source>
          , Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore,
          <year>2023</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>653</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>752</lpage>
          . URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/
          <fpage>978</fpage>
          -981-16-5172-4_
          <fpage>11</fpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/
          <fpage>978</fpage>
          -981-16-5172-4_
          <fpage>11</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Corsi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Marchesini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Farinelli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Formal verification of neural networks for safety-critical tasks in deep reinforcement learning</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, PMLR</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>333</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>343</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Passas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Bibliometric analysis: the main steps</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Encyclopedia</source>
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.-C.</given-names>
            <surname>Crayencour</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.-E.</given-names>
            <surname>Cella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Learning, probability and logic: Toward a unified approach for content-based music information retrieval</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Frontiers in Digital Humanities</source>
          <volume>6</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <article-title>6</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Morris</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Saez-Rodriguez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Sorger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Laufenburger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Logic-based models for the analysis of cell signaling networks</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Biochemistry</source>
          <volume>49</volume>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          )
          <fpage>3216</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3224</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Analytics</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Web of science,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Martín-Martín</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Costas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. Van</given-names>
            <surname>Leeuwen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. D.</given-names>
            <surname>López-Cózar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Evidence of open access of scientific publications in google scholar: A large-scale analysis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of informetrics 12</source>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <fpage>819</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>841</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. W.</given-names>
            <surname>Mouratidis</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Dimensions,
          <source>Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA</source>
          <volume>107</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>459</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>S. McReynolds</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Research Guides: Lens Guide: How to Use Lens.org, ???? URL: https:// researchguides.library.syr.edu/lensguide/use.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Falagas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. I.</given-names>
            <surname>Pitsouni</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Malietzis</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Pappas,
          <article-title>Comparison of pubmed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses</article-title>
          ,
          <source>The FASEB journal 22</source>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
          <fpage>338</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>342</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Dobesova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Programming language python for data processing</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: 2011 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering</source>
          , IEEE,
          <year>2011</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>4866</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>4869</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Büyükkıdık</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A bibliometric analysis: A tutorial for the bibliometrix package in r using irt literature</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology</source>
          <volume>13</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>164</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>193</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.-C.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Murphy</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Yuille</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs</article-title>
          ,
          <source>IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence</source>
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <fpage>834</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>848</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/ TPAMI.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <volume>2699184</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Shorten</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Khoshgoftaar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of big data 6</source>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>48</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W. Zuo,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Meng</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L. Zhang,
          <article-title>Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>