<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>BA 08019, Barcelona</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>BA 08034, Barcelona</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Digital transformation (DT) in Natural History Museums (NHMs) goes beyond the adoption of emerging technologies, as it requires a strategic rethinking of institutional processes, structures, and full alignment with the organisation's overarching strategy. This paper explores the methodological challenges encountered in designing a method for the strategic planning and deployment of DT initiatives in NHMs, in the context of an ongoing industrial doctoral research conducted by the corresponding author under academic supervision. The project is approved and funded by the Industrial Doctorates Programme of the Generalitat de Catalunya and carried out through a collaboration agreement between the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) and the Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona (MCNB). The research is situated in a real institutional setting that presents unique complexities, including the museum's current transition toward becoming a national museum and recent changes in its executive leadership. These dynamics add additional layers of complexity to the research process, particularly in balancing the academic rigour required by the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology with the demand for practical relevance expected by the host institution. This paper re ects on how the doctoral candidate, with the guidance of academic supervisors, has addressed these challenges, highlighting key strategies and lessons learned. By sharing this experience, the work aims to contribute to the broader discourse on applied research in complex organisational environments, o ering insights relevant to other applied researchers and industrial PhD candidates working at the intersection of academia and practice.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;digital transformation</kwd>
        <kwd>natural history museums</kwd>
        <kwd>strategic planning</kwd>
        <kwd>design science research</kwd>
        <kwd>institutional complexity</kwd>
        <kwd>industrial doctorate</kwd>
        <kwd>IS/IT1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Digital transformation (DT) has emerged as a strategic priority across sectors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">1,2</xref>
        ], including
cultural and scienti c institutions such as Natural History Museums (NHMs). Yet, these institutions
o en face distinctive challenges, such as constrained resources, historically layered governance,
and diverse technological infrastructures, that complicate the development of structured, strategic
fully aligned with the institution’s overall strategy as a whole, including its long-term direction and
institutional priorities [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], its strategic planning becomes essential, especially in public and cultural
organisations like NHMs [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5 ref6">5,6</xref>
        ]. The research is grounded in the real-world context of the Museu de
Ciències Naturals de Barcelona (MCNB), a public institution undergoing a process of strategic
transformation. Carried out in collaboration with the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
1RCIS 2025 Workshops and Research Projects Track. 20-23 May, 2025. Seville, Spain.
∗ Corresponding author. This work is part of her doctoral research conducted under academic supervision.
cristabel.alvarado@upc.edu (C.E. Alvarado); joan.antoni.pastor@upc.edu (J.A. Pastor); egarciafr@bcn.cat (E. García)
0000-0001-8857-7311 (CE. Alvarado); 0000-0003-0955-5064 (J.A. Pastor); 0000-0002-7999-5244 (E. García)
Copyright © 2025 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0
International (CC BY 4.0).
and framed within the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology, the project seeks to bridge
academic rigor with institutional relevance.
      </p>
      <p>By articulating the process, challenges, and decisions involved in designing a context-sensitive
method for DT planning, this work aims to contribute both theoretically and practically to the eld
of Information Systems. Furthermore, it o ers insights into how applied research can navigate
institutional complexity, produce transferable knowledge, and promote innovation in the cultural
heritage domain.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Project Background and Context</title>
      <p>
        This applied research emerged from the concrete needs of the Museu de Ciències Naturals de
Barcelona (MCNB) to enhance the strategic management of its information systems and
technologies (IS/IT), a need initially identi ed within the Collections Area due to its close
interaction with diverse databases and the management of high volumes of data. Despite being
recognized as a reference (NHM) in Southern Europe, the MCNB faces limitations in human and
nancial resources, as is o en the case in public institutions [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. The project has been accepted and
co- nanced by the Industrial Doctorates Plan, promoted by the Generalitat de Catalunya [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
Accordingly, the thesis is being developed within the framework of a cooperation agreement
between the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) and the MCNB, where the corresponding
author has been working as a doctoral candidate since July 2021.
      </p>
      <p>
        The proposed industrial doctorate project was submitted in the rst call of April 2021, approved
in June 2021, and o cially launched in July 2021. The full project description is available on the
o cial Industrial Doctorates Programme website [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]:
      </p>
      <p>https://doctoratsindustrials.gencat.cat/doctorats/disseny-dun-metode-integral-de-plani
cacioestrategica-i-desplegament-de-projectes-de-transformacio-digital-per-a-museus-de-cienciesnaturals/.</p>
      <p>The research is being carried out by Cristabel Evelia Alvarado Pérez, the industrial doctoral
candidate and corresponding author, under the guidance of her thesis supervisors, Dr Joan Antoni
Pastor Collado, acting as academic co-director on behalf of the UPC, and Dr Eulàlia Garcia
Franquesa, acting as academic co-director on behalf of the MCNB, the host institution.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Research Approach</title>
      <p>
        The project is framed within the methodology of Design Science Research (DSR), which o ers a
solid foundation for addressing the methodological challenges of applied research in real
institutional settings [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. Particular attention is paid to balancing academic rigor with practical
relevance, especially in a host institution currently undergoing internal transformation. As the
research progresses, the collaboration continues to yield insights that may be valuable for other
institutions and researchers operating at the intersection of academia, culture, and technology.
      </p>
      <p>
        Design Science Research (DSR) was adopted as the core methodology for this project due to its
dual capacity to address practical challenges while generating theoretical contributions [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
Rooted in a real-world problem within the cultural heritage sector and a clear gap in academic
literature, the project aligns with DSR’s goal of bridging relevance and rigor. Using Hevner’s
framework [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ], the research is structured around three components: the environment, the DSR
process, and the knowledge base (Figure 1). The MCNB serves as the environment, providing a
representative case to understand the broader context, challenges, and operational realities of
NHMs in the face of digital transformation, while the knowledge base includes the scienti c
foundations. Central to the methodology is a deep and sustained understanding of the problem to
ensure the designed artefact remains both context-sensitive and academically robust throughout
the research process.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Research Design and Objectives</title>
      <p>This applied research aims to structure the key problems, questions, and methodological
considerations surrounding the strategic planning of digital transformation (DT) in Natural History
Museums (NHMs). Accordingly, the main research question guiding the project is: how to design
and describe a comprehensive strategic planning method for digital transformation initiatives and
their deployment within NHMs? In addition, the primary goal is: to design, generate and
describe a domain-speci c and comprehensive strategic planning method for DT initiatives and
their deployment, aimed at supporting the speci c needs of NHMs. The expected tangible outcome
of this work is the creation of a new methodology to support strategic digital transformation (DT)
planning in such institutions.</p>
      <p>
        To guide the development of the artefact, the overall goal has been broken down into several
speci c objectives using the Manson methodology within the Design Science Research framework
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. These objectives include: (O1) identifying and understanding the problem; (O2) proposing a
potential solution; (O3) developing the artefact; (O4) evaluating the artefact; and (O5) drawing
conclusions. Each of these objectives is further supported by a set of sub-tasks that contribute to
their ful llment, as for example, active participation in DT projects inside the museum in the phase
O1 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref14">13,14</xref>
        ]. See gure 2.
      </p>
      <p>
        Moreover, following Manson’s model [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ], emphasis is placed on the cycles of circumspection
and operational and goal knowledge. The rst promotes a deep understanding of the problem and
its context, while the second ensures that the artefact remains actionable and aligned with the
problematic context. Hence, the method is developed inside a host institution (MCNB), but it is
designed to be adaptable and relevant for other NHMs facing similar digital transformation
challenges.
      </p>
      <p>
        In the context of an applied research project like an industrial doctorate, where Design Science
Research (DSR) is employed, it is important to clarify that the artefact is not meant to simply meet
the operational needs or institutional requirements of the host organisation. This is not a
consultancy project or a commissioned solution. Instead, the artefact must address the research
problem meaningfully and systematically, contributing to knowledge while also o ering potential
value to practice. As Manson suggests [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ], the development of the artefact should be guided by a
rigorous understanding of the problem and context, not by the pressure to deliver immediate or
tailored institutional outputs. This distinction reinforces the scienti c integrity and generalisability
of the resulting method, allowing it to be transferred to other NHMs facing similar challenges.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Relevance of the Project to Research Challenges in Information</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Science</title>
      <p>
        This project aligns strongly with several core research challenges outlined in the RCIS 2025
conference topics [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ], particularly under the theme "Advancing Information Science and
Information Systems uality in the Era of Complexity."
      </p>
      <p>Firstly, the project contributes to the domain of Enterprise Management and Engineering,
as it tackles digital transformation (DT) in the context of a complex, historically layered public
institution. The host organization, the MCNB, is embedded in a multifaceted governance structure
that includes the Barcelona City Council and the Generalitat de Catalunya; and has undergone
institutional transformations and leadership changes during the course of the research. These
characteristics require the development of DT strategies that go beyond linear planning, embracing
complexity management and contextual sensitivity, challenges that resonate with the need for
robust IS/IT approaches in organisation environments.</p>
      <p>Secondly, the research is situated within the category of Re ective Research and Practice,
speci cally engaging with topics such as Research Methodologies in Information Science and
Design Science and Rationale. Throughout the development of the project, the doctoral
candidate under academic supervision, has had to critically re ect on the methodological approach,
adjusting and re ning it to ensure both scienti c rigor and practical relevance. This re ective
process has led to important learnings on how to operationalize Design Science Research (DSR) in
institutional contexts that do not behave like standard business environments. As such, the project
o ers methodological insights that may be of interest to the RCIS community, particularly to
researchers working on applied research and method design in complex organisational settings.
5.1.</p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>Navigating Institutional Complexity: Contextual Challenges and</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-2">
        <title>Adaptation</title>
        <p>
          The Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona (MCNB) is a public institution with a long and
complex trajectory, shaped by decades of scienti c, educational, and curatorial work. Its
administrative structure is de ned by a consortium model that includes both the Barcelona City
Council and the Generalitat de Catalunya, making it subject to multiple layers of governance and
oversight. Over the years, the museum has also undergone a series of institutional mergers and
restructurings (Figure 3), which have contributed to a historically rich yet organisationally intricate
environment. [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ]
        </p>
        <p>During the rst year of the industrial doctorate project, the MCNB experienced signi cant shi s
in executive leadership and internal reorganisation, along with evolving strategic priorities that
directly impacted the positioning of the project within the institution. At one point, the digital
transformation initiative was deprioritized, resulting in the need for the doctoral candidate, under
academic supervision, to reinvest time and e ort into reintroducing and resituating the project.
This process required building new alliances, explaining the project’s scope and scienti c value to a
changing leadership, and navigating uncertainty regarding the project's institutional t.</p>
        <p>These challenges o er a valuable lens through which to understand institutional complexity;
not merely as a circumstantial obstacle, but as a dynamic condition that must be factored into the
design, deployment, and evaluation of applied research. In particular, this case underscores the
importance of resilience, adaptability, and stakeholder communication in carrying out a Design
Science Research (DSR) project within a public institution. It also illustrates how real-world
complexity intersects with academic goals, reinforcing the need for design methods that are robust
enough to accommodate shi s in context while still maintaining scienti c integrity and
methodological coherence.</p>
        <p>Such dynamic organisational shi s represent a key example of the complexity that characterises
many public institutions engaged in digital transformation processes. This case highlights the
importance of managing institutional complexity not as a barrier, but as an integral part of the
research context, especially in applied research projects situated in real-world settings. In this
regard, the project contributes not only to the scienti c discourse on digital transformation, but
also to the methodological understanding of how to carry out DSR in environments where political,
historical, and strategic factors evolve throughout the project lifecycle.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>6. Current Project Results</title>
      <p>To date, the project has advanced through several key stages of the DSR methodology. The problem
domain has been thoroughly explored through extensive literature reviews and the completion of a
benchmarking study involving 17 Natural History Museums (NHMs): the Natural History Museum
of London, the Smithsonian, Naturalis, etc. This benchmarking process required the construction of
an entire dataset, based on the deep analysis of more than 100 institutional websites, o cial
reports, and publicly available resources. This dataset is currently being considered for open access
publication, in line with open science practices, to increase transparency and academic rigour.</p>
      <p>The main dimensions evaluated in the benchmarking study included the age of the institutions,
the existence of strategic and digital transformation plans, the presence of IS/IT teams within the
institutions, the current state of digitalisation, data sharing policies, and major digital innovations.
Key ndings revealed that many of the institutions studied date back to the 19th century and tend
to be traditional in nature, o en lacking a strong culture of strategic planning or publicly available
digital transformation strategies. Although various digital innovations have been incorporated,
most still lack dedicated IS/IT teams within their organisational structure, which has delayed their
digital maturity. These ndings shed light on the broader context in which the artefact (the
method) is intended to operate.</p>
      <p>In parallel, it has also undertaken a comprehensive review of over 1,400 academic papers from
the Museum and the Web conference series, the leading global forum on digital innovation in
museums. This e ort is part of the ongoing second phase (O2) of the project, focused on generating
a well-grounded taxonomy of digital innovation. Together with the benchmarking, this serves as
the empirical foundation for the preliminary design of the proposed method.</p>
      <p>Currently, the project is concluding the (O2) phase and progressing through the development
phase (O3), which includes outlining and re ning the method’s structure, phases, and theoretical
foundations. This work will support subsequent phases (O4 and O5), in which the method will be
further developed, tested, and evaluated in relevant institutional contexts.</p>
      <p>In completing phase (O2), it became evident that there are signi cant structural and operational
similarities between natural history museums (NHMs) and museums of other disciplines. While
NHMs face speci c challenges, particularly in the area of data management due to the vast
amounts of biodiversity and geodiversity data they handle, their overall organisational architecture
tends to mirror that of other museum types. Most are public institutions with local governance and
similar organisational charts and departments (e.g. exhibitions, education, collections, research). As
a result, the potential for extending the methodology beyond NHMs is being actively considered.
Hence, to ensure the wider applicability of the artefact, its evaluation must remain objective and
independent of the particular needs of the host institution. For this reason, the doctoral candidate,
under academic supervision, is exploring external validation strategies, including expert reviews
from professionals in the Catalan Museum Sector who are experienced in digital transformation
and knowledgeable about di erent types of museums. This approach aims to reduce institutional
bias and ensure that the methodology is not overly tailored to the speci cs of the MCNB, but rather
adaptable to other museum contexts.</p>
      <p>Preliminary results have already been disseminated through various academic forums, including
international and national conferences such as CIMED 2022, CAISE'23, JCIS 2023, SPNHC 2023,
MCIS and MENACIS 2023. These contributions have helped to situate the research within
discussions of cultural heritage, IS/IT management, digital transformation and innovation in
NHMs, and continue to shape the development of a generalisable and transferable methodological
contribution to the eld of information science.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>7. Conclusions and Lessons Learned</title>
      <p>This paper has presented the methodological foundations and early ndings of an industrial
doctorate project focused on the strategic planning of digital transformation (DT) in Natural
History Museums (NHMs). By applying a Design Science Research (DSR) approach, the project
addresses a real institutional context while contributing to the academic understanding of method
design in complex organisational environments.</p>
      <p>The research highlights the importance of aligning DT initiatives with the broader institutional
strategy, especially in public organisations where governance, priorities, and resources are subject
to continuous change. In this context, institutional complexity is not simply a barrier, but a
de ning characteristic of the research environment; one that requires resilience, adaptability, and
methodological clarity.</p>
      <p>Although the project is ongoing, the steps taken so far have provided valuable insights into the
interplay between practical relevance and academic rigor. As the artefact continues its
development, the nal research phases will include the exploration of its applicability to other
types of museums beyond the natural sciences. This will help assess whether the resulting method
can be adapted for broader use across cultural institutions, contributing further to the eld of
Information Systems and digital transformation in heritage contexts.</p>
      <p>Throughout this process, several lessons have emerged. First, institutional complexity should be
embraced as a fundamental design condition, not just a contextual limitation. Second, navigating
real-world shi s in leadership, priorities, and resource allocation requires not only methodological
adaptability but also communication and advocacy skills. Third, the use of Design Science Research
(DSR) in applied settings must be constantly recalibrated to maintain its balance between relevance
and rigor. Fourth, establishing collaborative trust between academic and institutional actors is
essential to sustain progress across di erent phases of research. Finally, acknowledging the
evolving nature of the research environment enables the researchers to approach challenges not as
disruptions but as learning opportunities that can inform and strengthen the artefact under
development.</p>
      <sec id="sec-8-1">
        <title>Acknowledgements</title>
        <p>I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my academic supervisors, Joan Antoni
PastorCollado and Eulàlia Garcia-Franquesa. Thank you very much for your guidance during my doctoral
research!
This project has received funding from the Industrial Doctorate Plan promoted by the Generalitat
de Catalunya (EXPEDIENT 2021 DI 021).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-2">
        <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
        <p>During the preparation of this work, the corresponding author used GPT-4 and DeepL in order to:
support grammar and spelling checks and improve linguistic clarity. A er using these tools, the
corresponding author, under academic supervision, reviewed and edited all content as needed and
took full responsibility for the publication’s content.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-3">
        <title>References</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.L.</given-names>
            <surname>Rogers</surname>
          </string-name>
          , The Digital Transformation Playbook:
          <article-title>Rethink your business for the digital age</article-title>
          , Columbia University Press, New york,
          <year>2016</year>
          . https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203572-6.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Vial</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda</article-title>
          ,
          <source>J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. Rev</source>
          . (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>66</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008637-4.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mu.SA</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The Future of Museum Professionals in the Digital Era The Success Story of Mu</article-title>
          .SA,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Firts</surname>
            <given-names>Edit</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Hellenic Open University Press,
          <year>2020</year>
          . www.
          <source>project-musa.eu.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hossaini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Blankenberg</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Manual of Digital Museum Planning, Rowman &amp; Little eld, London,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Dorfman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Landim</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>O. Kamei,</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The future of natural history museums</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Futur. Nat. Hist. Museums</source>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          . https://doi.org/10.4324/
          <fpage>9781315531892</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>15</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Huxley</surname>
          </string-name>
          , C. uaisser,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.R.</given-names>
            <surname>Butler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.W.</given-names>
            <surname>Dekker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Managing Natural Science Collections</source>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          . https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429426599.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>EVE</given-names>
            <surname>Museos e Innovación</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Museos en la Era Digital</source>
          , (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). https://evemuseogra a.com/
          <year>2021</year>
          /01/06/museos-en
          <article-title>-la-era-digital/ (accessed April 19,</article-title>
          <year>2023</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[8] UPC, CMCNB, Design of a Comprehensive Method of Strategic Planning and Deployment of Digital Transformation Projects for Natural Science Museums</article-title>
          , (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). https://doctoratsindustrials.gencat.cat/doctorats/disseny-dun
          <article-title>-metode-integral-de-plani cacioestrategica-i-desplegament-de-projectes-de-transformacio-digital-per-a-museus-</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>de-</surname>
          </string-name>
          ciencies-naturals
          <source>/ (accessed December 25</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hevner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Chatterjee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Design Research in Information Systems:Theory and Practice</source>
          ,
          <year>2010</year>
          . https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/978-1-
          <fpage>4419</fpage>
          -5653-8.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Lukka</surname>
          </string-name>
          , The Constructive Research Approach, in: L.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ojala</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.-P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hilmola</surname>
          </string-name>
          (Eds.),
          <source>Case Study Res. Logist., Turku School of Economics and Business Administration</source>
          ,
          <year>2003</year>
          : pp.
          <fpage>83</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>101</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hevner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research</source>
          , Scand.
          <source>J. Inf. Syst</source>
          .
          <volume>19</volume>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <fpage>87</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>92</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/http://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol19/iss2/4.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Manson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Is operations research really research?,
          <source>ORiON</source>
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <fpage>155</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>180</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.5784/22-2-40.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Perellò Rodrìguez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.E. Alvarado</given-names>
            <surname>Pérez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.A.</given-names>
            <surname>Pastor</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Collado</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Proposta de procés per a la migració de dades a Specify</article-title>
          , Barcelona,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>À</surname>
            . Rubio i uintana, C.E. Alvarado Pérez,
            <given-names>J.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pastor</surname>
            <given-names>Collado</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Projecte per a la diagnosi dels sistemes i tecnologies d ' informació existents als Museus de la XMCNC INFORME FINAL</article-title>
          , Barcelona,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>[15] RCIS 2025 19th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science</source>
          , (n.d.). https://www.rcis-conf.
          <source>com/rcis2025/callResearchProjects.php (accessed March 22</source>
          ,
          <year>2025</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Història | Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona</surname>
          </string-name>
          , (n.d.). https://museuciencies.cat/el-nat/quesom/historia/ (accessed March 22,
          <year>2025</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>