<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>EfficientNet Deep Learning Model for Satellite Image Classification Using the EuroSAT Dataset</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Buse Saricayir</string-name>
          <email>busesaricayir@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Caner Ozcan</string-name>
          <email>canerozcan@karabuk.edu.tr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>CMIS-2025: Eighth International Workshop on Computer Modeling and Intelligent Systems</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Software Engineering, University of Karabuk</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Karabuk, 78050</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="TR">Turkiye</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This study investigates the use of EfficientNet-B0, a computationally efficient convolutional neural network architecture, for satellite image classification using the EuroSAT dataset. Evaluating the baseline EfficientNet-B0 model, we achieved 98.1% overall accuracy and a 0.98 macro-averaged F1 score on the test set. This performance is highly competitive with state-of-the-art results reported for the EuroSAT dataset, demonstrating that EfficientNet-B0 offers a strong balance between high accuracy and computational efficiency. These findings suggest that EfficientNet-B0 is a promising approach for tasks requiring efficient satellite image categorization, such as large-scale land use monitoring, urban planning, and environmental management analysis based on satellite imagery.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Satellite Image Classification</kwd>
        <kwd>EfficientNet</kwd>
        <kwd>Deep Learning</kwd>
        <kwd>EuroSAT</kwd>
        <kwd>Remote Sensing 1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The Earth is composed of only about 29% land-continents and islands, and the remaining 71% is
covered by water-saltwater bodies like oceans and seas as well as freshwater sources such as rivers or
lakes: with 2% being made up by frozen forms such as ice caps or glaciers. Among the different types of
lands, habitable land is the only one where one can live and produce things from it for example
agricultural land which occupies about 70% pastureland and 30% arable land. Pasture, grazing land,
rangelands, and meadows are primarily used for livestock rearing, whereas cultivated, arable, and
croplands are designated for crop production. Manual classification of these various areas requires more
time through image interpretation techniques [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] because localization costs too much money since data
analysts don’t want to do much digging around, so automation becomes necessary. This therefore calls
for an effective automatic satellite image classification technique that involves learning different
vegetation types e.g., agriculture, forests, etc., and studying urban-residential as well as commercial to
determine different land uses in an area [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ][
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The significance of image interpretation from satellites has multiplied in different areas such as
planning urbanization, agriculture and environmental monitoring. The demand for efficient and
accurate ways of classifying this type of information is increasing in the face of ballooning satellite data
volumes and improved quality. In urban planning, classification of satellite images helps create maps
that highlight city configurations, debt infrastructure progress, or reveal land use patterns. Such
knowledge helps to make informed choices concerning the allocation of resources and development
needs for urban expansion. In addition, the agricultural sector uses these images to determine crop types
variation, monitor their health conditions, note land cover changes among others which are useful in
precision farming and management of crops. Furthermore, deforestation; desertification; water bodies
alterations detection and analyses can be done through environmental monitoring based on these
classifications. With an advancement in satellite technology comes a deeper richer data requiring
sophisticated algorithms as well as machine learning techniques in order to manage these great volumes
of information obtained.</p>
      <p>
        Satellite imagery is a global effort to map worldwide communities such as OpenStreetMap [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ],
Google Earth [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], and Earth Explorer [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] which are platforms where maps are digitized using
high0009-0005-5868-0189 (B. Saricayir); 0000-0002-2854-4005 (C. Ozcan)
© 2025 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
      </p>
      <p>
        Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
resolution images. These digitized maps act as living documents, where new features are added
remotely by mappers located miles away while satellite pictures remain accessible to scientists across
continents. Researchers have worked with various satellite image classification datasets like Landsat
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ], Sentinel-2 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], In-orbit [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], and RSI-CB256 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] among others. Satellite imagery has a wide range of
applications namely cartography and navigation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ], disaster response [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ], and ecological monitoring
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]. These purposes can be achieved through highly accurate model satellite images.
      </p>
      <p>
        This study investigates the use of EfficientNet, a state-of-the-art convolutional neural network
architecture for classifying satellite images. In 2019, Tan and Le [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ] developed an extremely effective
image classification method known as EfficientNet which has been applied in many other fields too
because it achieves excellent results while keeping computations at minimal levels. It is possible to
make networks deeper, wider, or higher resolution through their compound scaling techniques, thus
increasing both accuracy and efficiency beyond what traditional CNNs offer.
      </p>
      <p>
        For this study, we utilize the EuroSAT dataset [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ], a valuable resource for satellite image
classification tasks. Recognizing the increasing need for methods that balance accuracy with
computational efficiency in large-scale remote sensing, this research specifically evaluates the
performance of the baseline EfficientNet-B0 architecture. By leveraging the EuroSAT dataset, we aim
to establish a robust performance benchmark for EfficientNet-B0, assessing its ability to accurately
classify diverse land use and land cover categories while capitalizing on its inherent efficiency. This
evaluation helps determine its suitability for practical applications like land use monitoring and
management strategies where both accuracy and processing speed are important considerations.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related Works</title>
      <p>
        With advances in satellite imaging and machine learning, land use and land cover (LULC) classification
has made significant progress. LULC data is crucial for various applications, including urban planning,
agriculture, forestry, and disaster management. Traditionally, LULC classification has relied on manual
or semi-automatic methods that are time-consuming and prone to errors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ]. The integration of deep
learning methods has improved both the efficiency and accuracy of classification tasks, enabling the
analysis of large datasets [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The development of benchmark datasets has played a key role in advancing machine learning and
computer vision research in remote sensing. Notable datasets such as the UC Merced Land Use Dataset
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ] and BigEarthNet [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
        ] have provided standardized benchmarks for training and evaluating models.
These datasets have facilitated the comparison of algorithms, fostering innovation and progress in the
field.
      </p>
      <p>
        The EuroSAT dataset [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ], is a benchmark dataset specifically designed for LULC classification
tasks. EuroSAT has been widely used in various research contexts. Several papers have investigated
alternative deep learning approaches. Yassine et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
        ] improved LULC classification from satellite
imagery using deep learning techniques on the EuroSAT dataset, although they did not specify the
architecture used. Similarly, Gunen [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
        ] compared deep learning and machine learning methods for
wetland water area determination using EuroSAT, highlighting the potential of deep learning but not
focusing on a particular efficient architecture.
      </p>
      <p>
        Kumari and Minz [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
        ] explored the use of convolutional networks with focal loss optimization for
LULC scene classification, also using the EuroSAT and Sentinel-2 datasets. Their work, however,
differs from ours in its focus on loss function optimization rather than architectural efficiency.
      </p>
      <p>Bhatt and Bhatt [23] proposed a novel methodology (DCRFF-LHRF) for efficient land cover
classification on the EuroSAT dataset; however, their approach differs from ours in its methodological
innovation rather than its specific choice of architecture.</p>
      <p>Other research has focused on enhancing the EuroSAT dataset or exploring transfer learning
techniques. Kunwar and Ferdush [24] investigated the application of transfer learning for LULC
mapping using the EuroSAT dataset. Kurian et al. [25] similarly explored transfer learning approaches
in remote sensing image classification, but without specific application to EuroSAT or a comparative
study of various deep learning architectures. Gurav et al. [26] compared GAN-based methods for
enhancing EuroSAT image classification, providing a complementary approach to improve
classification accuracy.</p>
      <p>The work by Honegger et al. [27] presented the EuroSAT Model Zoo, a valuable benchmark, but did
not directly compare the performance of EfficientNet. Finally, while Ghozatlou et al. [28] explored
active learning for Earth observation satellite image classification, their focus on active learning
strategies contrasts with the focus of this study on the efficient architecture of EfficientNet.</p>
      <p>
        This study distinguishes itself by providing a focused evaluation of the baseline EfficientNet-B0
variant's performance specifically on the EuroSAT dataset, analyzing its effectiveness in terms of both
classification accuracy and its inherent computational efficiency. While previous works have applied
various deep learning models [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20 ref21 ref22">20-23, 27, 28</xref>
        ] or transfer learning approaches [24, 25] to EuroSAT, or
explored different aspects like loss functions [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
        ] or data enhancement [26], few have systematically
benchmarked the trade-offs offered by the lightweight, entry-level EfficientNet-B0. By establishing this
performance baseline, our work provides a valuable reference point for assessing the practical utility of
efficient architectures and for comparison against future, potentially more complex models developed
for EuroSAT-based land cover classification.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Proposed Methodology</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Dataset</title>
        <p>The dataset, that used in the study, includes various categories such as annual crop, forest, herbaceous
vegetation, motorway, industrial, pasture, permanent crop, residential, river, sea, and lake. The
EuroSAT dataset is particularly suitable for this study due to its comprehensive coverage of European
land cover types and its multispectral nature. This allows to evaluate the performance of EfficientNet on
a variety of satellite imagery that closely mimics real-world applications. Furthermore, the balanced
class distribution of the dataset allows a fair assessment of the classification capabilities of the model
across different land use categories. EuroSAT consists of 27,000 labeled Sentinel-2 satellite images
covering 13 spectral bands and 10 land use and land cover classes. The images are 64x64 pixels in size.
Each class contains 2,000 to 3,000 images. Figure 1 shows the distribution of images in the dataset by
class. Figure 2 provides examples of the dataset.</p>
        <p>The EuroSAT is a dataset of satellite imagery selected in relation to the cities covered in the
European Urban Atlas. The cities covered are distributed over 34 European countries: Austria, Belarus,
Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic (Czechia), Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany,
Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy/Holy See, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta,
Republic of Moldova, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain,
Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine and the United Kingdom. The distribution of the EuroSAT dataset is
shown in Figure 3.</p>
        <p>The illustration in Figure 4 gives an overview of the process of patch-based land use and land cover
classification using satellite imagery. A satellite scans the Earth's surface to collect images from the
ground. From these images, small-sized image patches are used for the classification task. The aim is to
automatically provide labels that identify the physical type of terrain or how the land is used. To do this,
an image patch is fed into a classifier, in this case a neural network, and the classifier predicts the class
shown on the image patch.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2. EfficientNet</title>
        <p>
          In this study, EfficientNet-B0 was selected as the primary model for classifying satellite images. As the
baseline architecture within the EfficientNet series [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ], it is specifically designed to optimize the
balance between model complexity (depth, width, resolution) and performance effectively [29]. Our
rationale for choosing B0 was to first establish a performance benchmark using the most
computationally efficient member of this model family, providing insights into its suitability for
resource-aware applications before potentially exploring larger, more computationally intensive
variants. These networks rely on mobile inverted bottleneck convolution (MBConv) as their
fundamental building blocks. MBConv incorporates a technique known as squeezing-and-excitation
optimization. This method enhances the model's ability to recalibrate feature channels, thereby
improving its overall performance in classification tasks.
        </p>
        <p>EfficientNet-B0 uses activation functions that contribute to its efficiency. The model also includes
depth-wise separable convolutions, allowing for reduced computational costs during training. This
feature is particularly beneficial when handling large datasets, like satellite images. The model
comprises seven distinct stages, each containing a varying number of layers, specifically between one
and four layers, depending on the requirements of the stage.</p>
        <p>The input layer of EfficientNet-B0 was adapted to suit the satellite image classification task
effectively. This adaptation was necessary to accommodate the 13 spectral bands utilized in the
EuroSAT dataset [30]. These bands represent different wavelengths of light, providing important
information for land classification.</p>
        <p>At the end, the final classification layer is replaced by a new fully connected layer with ten output
nodes corresponding to land use and land cover classes from the dataset. These nodes correspond to the
specific land use and land cover classes defined in our dataset. This adjustment ensures that the model
accurately reflects the categories to aim to classify. The initial weights of the model were set using
pretrained weights from ImageNet, a large and diverse image dataset. This process took advantage of
transfer learning, allowing the model to adopt to the unique characteristics of the satellite images while
retaining the knowledge gained from the ImageNet dataset. This strategic approach set the foundation
for our satellite image classification efforts. Figure 5 provides an example structure of the model used in
this study.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Experimental Results</title>
      <p>The baseline model called EfficientNet-B0, achieved an overall accuracy of 98.1% on the EuroSAT test
set. It demonstrates that EfficientNet is efficient for satellite image classification tasks, performing at a
competitive level with state-of-the-art results on this dataset. At the end of training, loss, and accuracy
graphs were obtained. These graphs are shown in Figure 6. The plot of loss reveals a significant drop-off
of both train and validation losses across epochs as it gradually declines from initial high values. This
trend shows good convergence, while the closeness between training and validation losses indicates that
the model generalizes well without any symptoms of overfitting. The accuracy plot shows a clear
upward trend with accuracy peaking above 90%. This means that as the model trains, its predictions
become more accurate over time. The steady improvement implies that further training could yield more
benefits. Thus, these results prove that the model learns very well and generalizes effectively when
applied to satellite image data.</p>
      <p>The EfficientNet-B0 model showed strong performance on all 10-land use and land cover categories
in the EuroSAT dataset, with F1-scores ranging from 0.96 to 1.00. The model excels in classifying
different categories such as "PermanentCrop" and "River" due to their unique spectral signatures and
homogeneous textures in satellite imagery. Classes such as "AnnualCrop", "Highway" and "SeaLake"
also performed well with F1-scores of 0.99. The results for each class are shown in Table 1.</p>
      <p>In Figure 7, the confusion matrix shows the classification performance of the EfficientNet B0 model
on satellite images. The highest value along diagonal represents perfect accuracies with AnnualCrop,
highway and permanent crops being particularly strong at; 0.99, 0.99 and 1.00 respectively. Thus, these
values imply that a large number of these categories are correctly classified by this model with high
precision. However, there is slight confusion, such as Forest being misclassified as Herbaceous
Vegetation (1% of Forest samples) and Residential areas sometimes misclassified as SeaLake (3% of
Residential samples). This suggests the model faces slight difficulties distinguishing between categories
with potentially similar spectral characteristics (e.g., certain forest types vs. dense vegetation) or
contextual elements (e.g., coastal residential zones, properties with large water features). Overall, the
matrix demonstrates strong performance while highlighting specific areas where future work might
yield improvements.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Discussion</title>
      <p>The experimental results clearly demonstrate that EfficientNet-B0 is a highly effective model for
satellite image classification using the EuroSAT dataset. Achieving 98.1% overall accuracy and a 0.98
macro-averaged F1 score, its performance is competitive with, or exceeds, several reported
state-ofthe-art methods on EuroSAT, validating its capability. The performance across different classes was
consistently high, with F1-scores ranging from 0.96 to 1.00, highlighting its robustness in
distinguishing different landscape types.</p>
      <p>One of the key advantages of EfficientNet-B0 is its computational efficiency, which is particularly
relevant in remote sensing applications where handling large-scale satellite imagery is essential. The
compound scaling approach of EfficientNet allows it to balance model depth, width, and resolution
while maintaining strong performance. This efficiency, combined with the demonstrated high
accuracy, makes it a compelling baseline, particularly for applications where computational resources
may be constrained.</p>
      <p>The confusion matrix analysis indicates that the model performs well across most categories, with
particularly strong classification in classes such as PermanentCrop and River, likely due to their
distinct spectral signatures. However, minor misclassifications were observed between Forest and
Herbaceous Vegetation, as well as between Residential and SeaLake. These errors, potentially
stemming from spectral similarities or contextual overlaps as noted in Section 4, and possibly
influenced by the dataset's resolution, indicate areas for potential improvement. Future work could
address these challenges by incorporating additional training data, fine-tuning hyperparameters, or
leveraging ensemble learning techniques to further improve classification accuracy.</p>
      <p>
        Additionally, while EfficientNet-B0 has proven to be a powerful and efficient baseline model,
exploring other EfficientNet variants (such as B3 or B4) which trade some efficiency for potentially
higher capacity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ], or applying advanced transfer learning techniques, could further enhance
performance. Multi-spectral feature fusion, integrating different spectral bands from Sentinel-2, may
also improve class separability, especially for challenging categories.
      </p>
      <p>Overall, the findings suggest that EfficientNet is a promising architecture for satellite image
classification, offering a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. The results indicate
their potential for large-scale automated remote sensing applications, paving the way for more
efficient and accurate land cover monitoring in the future.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Limitations and Future Work</title>
      <p>While this study demonstrates the effectiveness of EfficientNet-B0 for satellite image classification
using the EuroSAT dataset, it is important to acknowledge certain limitations and potential avenues
for future research. Understanding these limitations is crucial for interpreting the results within a
broader context and guiding future efforts to improve the accuracy and applicability of satellite image
classification techniques.</p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>6.1. Dataset-Related Limitations</title>
        <p>The EuroSAT dataset, while widely used and valuable, presents certain inherent limitations. The
images are relatively low-resolution (64x64 pixels), which may limit the ability to distinguish
finegrained details and complex land cover patterns. This lower resolution may result in difficulties in
classifying urban areas with dense buildings or agricultural areas with narrow fields, for example.
Furthermore, EuroSAT represents a specific geographic region (Europe) and period. This may limit
the generalizability of the trained model to other regions with different environmental conditions,
agricultural practices, or land use patterns. The dataset's class balance, while generally good, may not
perfectly reflect the real-world distribution of land cover types in all regions, potentially leading to
biased performance in specific applications. Another aspect to consider is the reliance on Sentinel-2
imagery alone. Integrating other data sources, such as LiDAR data for elevation information or radar
data for cloud penetration, could provide complementary information and improve classification
accuracy, especially in cloud-prone regions.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-2">
        <title>6.2. Model-Related Limitations</title>
        <p>EfficientNet-B0, while computationally efficient, is a relatively shallow model compared to some other
deep learning architectures. More complex models, such as larger EfficientNet variants (B1-B7) or
transformer-based models, may potentially achieve higher accuracy, especially on more challenging
datasets or with higher-resolution imagery. However, increasing model complexity typically comes at
the cost of increased computational requirements and a greater risk of overfitting, requiring careful
regularization and validation strategies. The reliance on ImageNet pre-trained weights, while
beneficial for transfer learning, may also introduce a bias towards features that are more common in
natural images than in satellite imagery. Fine-tuning the model with a larger satellite-specific dataset
or exploring alternative pre-training strategies could potentially mitigate this bias. Also, the current
implementation does not explicitly address the spatial context of the images. Integrating spatial
information, such as using contextual information from neighboring image patches, could improve
classification accuracy, especially for land cover types that exhibit spatial dependencies (e.g.,
agricultural fields or urban areas).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-3">
        <title>6.3. Future Research Directions</title>
        <p>Building upon the success of this study, several exciting avenues for future research emerge. A
primary focus should be on expanding the datasets utilized in model training, incorporating larger,
more diverse, and higher-resolution satellite imagery from various geographic regions. This could
also involve leveraging multi-temporal data to capture seasonal variations and fusing data from
multiple sensors like LiDAR and radar to enhance classification accuracy, particularly in cloud-prone
areas. Moreover, exploring more advanced deep learning architectures, such as transformer-based
models or hybrid CNN-transformer networks, holds the potential for improved performance by
capturing long-range dependencies and contextual information more effectively. Developing
domainspecific pre-training strategies tailored to satellite imagery characteristics, rather than relying solely
on ImageNet pre-trained weights, could further enhance feature extraction. Addressing the
challenges of uncertainty and explainability in model predictions is crucial, necessitating the
development of methods for quantifying and visualizing prediction uncertainties, as well as exploring
explainable AI techniques to understand model decision-making processes. Furthermore, focusing on
real-world applications and deployment in areas like land use monitoring and urban planning is
essential, involving the creation of user-friendly tools and integration of models into existing
workflows. Finally, exploring active learning strategies to reduce the need for vast labeled datasets
and utilizing temporal analysis to detect land cover changes over time represents promising avenues
for future investigation. By pursuing these directions, the field of satellite image classification can
continue to advance, ultimately leading to more sustainable and effective management of our planet's
resources.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>7. Conclusion</title>
      <p>EfficientNet-B0 has emerged as a highly compelling solution for satellite image classification when
applied to the EuroSAT dataset. Achieving a robust overall accuracy of 98.1% and a macro-averaged F1
score of 0.98, the model demonstrates a strong capacity to effectively categorize ten distinct land use
and land cover classes. This level of performance is comparable to state-of-the-art results reported in
the literature for this dataset, establishing EfficientNet-B0 as a strong baseline contender. The
consistently high F1-scores across the different classes, ranging from 0.96 to 1.00, further emphasize
its reliability and potential for broad applicability in real-world scenarios where diverse landscapes
are encountered. The observed reduction in training and validation losses throughout the training
process reinforces the model's ability to generalize well and minimize misclassifications, indicating a
robust learning process.</p>
      <p>Beyond the accuracy metrics, the inherent computational efficiency of EfficientNet-B0 is a
significant advantage. This efficiency allows for the processing of large-scale satellite imagery
datasets without demanding excessive computational resources, a critical factor for practical
deployment in operational settings. The model's ability to balance accuracy with computational cost
makes it a valuable tool for applications where timely and cost-effective analysis is paramount.</p>
      <p>The detailed confusion matrix analysis provides valuable insights into the model's performance,
highlighting areas of strength and potential areas for refinement. While the model exhibits excellent
performance, minor misclassifications between spectrally similar classes suggest areas for future
refinement, potentially through strategies like incorporating additional data or multi-spectral fusion,
as discussed. Exploring larger EfficientNet variants or more recent architectures may also yield
improvements, likely with increased computational demands.</p>
      <p>Looking forward, future research should focus on several key areas to further enhance the model's
performance and broaden its applicability. First, addressing the observed misclassifications through
strategies such as incorporating additional training data, especially for the less well-classified
categories, could prove beneficial. Further optimization of the model's architecture, including
finetuning hyperparameters specific to satellite imagery characteristics, may also yield improved results.
Exploring alternative EfficientNet variants, such as B1, B3, or B4, or even experimenting with more
recent architectures, could lead to increased accuracy, potentially at the expense of some
computational efficiency. Furthermore, incorporating multi-spectral feature fusion techniques,
leveraging the rich spectral information from the Sentinel-2 bands, could improve class separability
and reduce ambiguity in classification, especially for the challenging land cover types. The use of data
augmentation techniques could also be explored to improve model generalization and robustness.</p>
      <p>In conclusion, this study validates EfficientNet-B0 as a powerful and efficient solution for satellite
image classification on EuroSAT. The demonstrated performance, combined with identified avenues
for future research, positions EfficientNet-based approaches as a promising pathway toward advanced
and automated remote sensing capabilities, contributing valuable insights for the effective and
sustainable management of our planet's resources.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>During the preparation of this work, the authors used Grammarly in order to: Grammar and spelling
check. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full
responsibility for the publication’s content.
[23] Bhatt, A., &amp; Bhatt, V. T. (2024). Dcrff-Lhrf: an improvised methodology for efficient land-cover
classification on EuroSAT dataset. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(18), 54001-54025.
[24] Kunwar, S., &amp; Ferdush, J. (2023). Mapping of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) using EuroSAT
and Transfer Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02424.
[25] Kurian, V., Jacob, V., &amp; Kuruvilla, J. (2024, April). Approach of Transfer Learning in Remote
Sensing Image Classification. In 2024 1st International Conference on Trends in Engineering
Systems and Technologies (ICTEST) (pp. 1-3). IEEE.
[26] Gurav, A. S., Karanjikar, Y. M., Bhikle, O. A., &amp; Deshpande, H. (2024, August). Comparing the
Effectiveness of GAN-based Methods for Enhancing EuroSAT Satellite Imagery Classification. In
2024 5th International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems
(ICESC) (pp. 1611-1616). IEEE.
[27] Honegger, D., Schürholt, K., Scheibenreif, L., &amp; Borth, D. (2023, July). EuroSAT Model Zoo: A
Dataset and Benchmark on Populations of Neural Networks and Its Sparsified Model Twins. In
IGARSS 2023-2023 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (pp. 888-891).</p>
      <p>IEEE.
[28] Ghozatlou, O., Anghel, A., &amp; Datcu, M. (2024, September). Active Learning with Deep Support
Vector Data Description for Earth Observation Satellite Image Classification. In 2024
International Workshop on the Theory of Computational Sensing and its Applications to Radar,
Multimodal Sensing and Imaging (CoSeRa) (pp. 31-35). IEEE.
[29] Hadi, V. H. B., Mutiara, A. B., &amp; Refianti, R. (2023, December). Implementation of Convolutional
Neural Network with EfficientNet-B0 Architecture for Brain Tumor Classification. In 2023 Eighth
International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[30] Singh, R., Sharma, N., Rajput, K., &amp; Kumar, M. (2024, June). EfficientNet-B0-Based Classification
of Pneumonic Lungs Using Chest X-Ray Dataset. In 2023 4th International Conference on
Intelligent Technologies (CONIT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[31] Putra, Tryan &amp; Rufaida, Syahidah &amp; Leu, Jenq-Shiou. (2020). Enhanced Skin Condition Prediction
Through Machine Learning Using Dynamic Training and Testing Augmentation. IEEE Access.
PP. 1-1. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976045.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Di</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Haibin</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alregib</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Ghassan.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Real-time seismic-image interpretation via deconvolutional neural network</article-title>
          .
          <source>2051-2055. 10.1190/segam2018-2997303</source>
          .1.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Abdul</given-names>
            <surname>Azeem</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Sharma</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Hasija</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>S.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Classification of Satellite Images Using an Ensembling Approach Based on Deep Learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>Arab J Sci Eng</source>
          <volume>49</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>3703</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3718</lpage>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08143-7
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tehsin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Samabia</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>"Satellite image categorization using scalable deep learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>" Applied Sciences 13.8</source>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          ):
          <fpage>5108</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
            , Qi,
            <given-names>Shuzhu</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>Yaoming</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Exploring the accuracy and completeness patterns of global land-cover/land-use data in OpenStreetMap."</article-title>
          <source>Applied Geography</source>
          <volume>145</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ):
          <fpage>102742</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5] Zhang,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chao</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>"Mapping irrigated croplands in China using a synergetic training sample generating method, machine learning classifier, and Google Earth Engine."</article-title>
          <source>International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation</source>
          <volume>112</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ):
          <fpage>102888</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Agócs</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tibor</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>"Far-Infrared Outgoing Radiation Understanding and Monitoring (FORUM)- System Overview and Key Technology Developments of ESA's 9th Earth Explorer." IGARSS 2022-2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium</article-title>
          . IEEE,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[7] Landsat data freely available from the U.S. geological survey</article-title>
          .
          <source>Accessed on Jun</source>
          <year>2024</year>
          . https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sentinel</surname>
            <given-names>Sentinel</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>-2 datasets in earth engine from Google developers</article-title>
          .
          <source>Accessed on Jun</source>
          <year>2024</year>
          . https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/sentinel-2/
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[9] In-orbit satellite image datasets from Kaggle</article-title>
          .
          <source>Accessed on Jun</source>
          <year>2024</year>
          . https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/benguthrie/inorbit
          <article-title>-satellite-image-datasets</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <article-title>RSI-CB256 satellite image classification from Kaggle</article-title>
          .
          <source>Accessed on Jun</source>
          <year>2024</year>
          . https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mahmoudreda55/satellite-image-classification
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dymkova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>"Conjunction and synchronization methods of earth satellite images with local cartographic data." 2020 Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on Board Communications</article-title>
          . IEEE,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Antzoulatos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gerasimos</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>"Flood hazard and risk mapping by applying an explainable machine learning framework using satellite imagery</article-title>
          and
          <source>GIS data." Sustainability 14.6</source>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ):
          <fpage>3251</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kimothi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sanjeev</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>"Intelligent energy and ecosystem for real-time monitoring of glaciers."</article-title>
          <source>Computers and Electrical Engineering</source>
          <volume>102</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ):
          <fpage>108163</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mingxing</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>Quoc</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Le</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks." International conference on machine learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>PMLR</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Helber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Patrick</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp; Bischke, Benjamin &amp; Dengel, Andreas &amp; Borth,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Damian.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <article-title>EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classification</article-title>
          .
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/JSTARS.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <volume>2918242</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance</article-title>
          .
          <source>International journal of Remote sensing</source>
          ,
          <volume>28</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>823</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>870</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>X. X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tuia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Xia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Xu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fraundorfer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources. IEEE geoscience and remote sensing magazine</article-title>
          , 
          <volume>5</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>8</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>36</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Newsam</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          , November).
          <article-title>Bag-of-visual-words and spatial extensions for landuse classification</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>270</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>279</lpage>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sumbul</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Charfuelan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Demir</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Markl</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ,
          <article-title>July)</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Bigearthnet: A large-scale benchmark archive for remote sensing image understanding</article-title>
          .
          <source>In IGARSS 2019-2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>5901</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>5904</lpage>
          ). IEEE.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yassine</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tout</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jaber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Improving LULC classification from satellite imagery using deep learning-EuroSAT dataset</article-title>
          .
          <source>The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</source>
          ,
          <volume>43</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>369</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>376</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gunen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Performance comparison of deep learning and machine learning methods in determining wetland water areas using EuroSAT dataset</article-title>
          .
          <source>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>29</volume>
          (
          <issue>14</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>21092</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>21106</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kumari</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Minz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Land Use Land Cover Scene classification with Focal Loss optimization of Convolutional Networks using Sentinel-2 EuroSAT Dataset</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>