<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>From Months to Moments: Knowledge-Graph-Grounded LLM Co-Pilots for Strategic Decision-Making</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Giovanni Scarso Borioli</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Davide Sola</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Roberto Quaglia</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Alex Jordan</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Student</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Declaration on Generative AI</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>ESCP Business School</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>London</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UK">United Kingdom</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Most Companies still struggle to turn strategy into action. Our interviews with 20+ C-suite leaders reveal four selfreinforcing gaps: fragmented language, ad-hoc processes, static tools and inadequate capabilities, all reinforcing each other into what we call “the Strategy Chasm”. We show that these gaps violate Ashby's law of requisite variety: the business environment is more complex than the organisation's ability to respond. We prescribe a dual fix. First, a universal, machine-readable Strategy Ontology that distils half a century of research and practice into a common language. Second, AI strategy co-pilots, built on knowledge graphs which converts the universal strategy ontology in a machine-readable standard, and linked to LLM agents which can proficiently process language. This is a technical architecture which has already been implemented in other knowledge-intensive sectors where standard ontologies exist (e.g. legal services or pharmaceutical research). The strategy co-pilots amplify managerial insight, synthesising context, critiquing drafts and suggesting strategic options in real time. With this paper, we suggest design principles for the Strategy Ontology and a visual representation: the Strategy in Action Canvas. The result is a scafolding for a computable, continuously learning, strategy system that compresses planning cycles from months to days.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Strategy Ontology</kwd>
        <kwd>Knowledge Graphs</kwd>
        <kwd>Generative and Semantic AI</kwd>
        <kwd>Strategy Formulation and Execution</kwd>
        <kwd>Strategic Decision-Making</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The author(s) have not employed any Generative AI tools.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>