<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Positioning and Indoor Navigation, September</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1613-0073</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>FCI-AEKF: A Robust GNSS/5G Hybrid Positioning Framework with Dynamic Motion and Noise Adaptation</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>JianQing Wang</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Zhongliang Deng</string-name>
          <email>dengzhl@bupt.edu.cn</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Fen Qiu</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mingyang Ma</string-name>
          <email>mingyangma@bupt.edu.cn</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Shan Xu</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Workshop</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>5G-GNSS Integration, FCI-AEKF, Vehicle Motion Prediction</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Noise Estimation</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>10 Xitucheng Road, Haidian district, Beijing</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="CN">China</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>District</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="CN">China</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Nanchang University Institute of Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>No.199, Wusi Avenue, Gongqing City, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="CN">China</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>Trafic Management Corps of Jiangxi Provincial Public Security Department</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>No. 997 Fenghuang North Avenue, Honggutan</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <fpage>5</fpage>
      <lpage>18</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper presents a Fast Covariance Intersection-based Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter (FCI-AEKF) framework for PPP-RTK and 5G integrated positioning. The framework addresses key challenges in GNSS-5G fusion, including limited use of PPP-RTK's high precision, slow error convergence from simple motion models, and distancedependent 5G measurement noise. It enables multi-rate fusion of PPP-RTK and 5G data, combining high-rate 5G updates with PPP-RTK corrections. A dynamic motion model switching strategy is proposed to adaptively select between constant velocity (CV) and constant acceleration (CA) models based on real-time vehicle dynamics. Additionally, a distance-based noise model is introduced to adjust measurement noise covariance, enhancing robustness under varying conditions. Experimental results on open-source GNSS data from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms existing GNSS-5G fusion approaches in accuracy, robustness, and resistance to interference.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>CEUR</p>
      <p>ceur-ws.org</p>
      <p>To address these gaps, this paper introduces an adaptive model-switching strategy that dynamically
selects appropriate motion models based on vehicle dynamics. In addition, a distance-aware noise model
and a dynamic fusion weighting mechanism are designed to enable real-time covariance adaptation,
enhancing robustness and positioning accuracy under diverse signal conditions.</p>
      <p>Fig. 1 illustrates our proposed hybrid positioning system integrating PPP-RTK, 5G PRS, and CORS
corrections for urban scenarios.</p>
      <p>To this end, we propose a Fast Covariance Intersection-based Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter
(FCI-AEKF) framework, with key contributions:
• First integration of PPP-RTK and 5G in a multi-rate fusion framework, leveraging precise
corrections for enhanced accuracy over SPP-based methods.
• An adaptive motion model switching strategy to improve tracking under varying dynamics.
• A distance-based noise model for real-time adjustment of measurement noise covariance,
improving robustness.
• A dynamic localization mode-switching strategy to maintain positioning continuity under
degraded GNSS/5G conditions.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. System model</title>
      <p>2.1. PPP-RTK Measurement Model
The linearized observation equations for pseudorange and carrier phase of the  th satellite on frequency
 are:
Δ   =   ⋅    +  ⋅    +     +     −    +   , +</p>
      <p>ΔΦ =   ⋅    +    +     −     +     +  
Here,   and    represent the direction cosine and position correction, respectively.  is the speed of
light,    is the receiver clock bias,   and   are mapping functions, and   ,   denote tropospheric
and ionospheric delays.     is carrier phase ambiguity, and   ,   are Gaussian noise terms. Satellite
clock and relativistic efects are assumed corrected [ 7].</p>
      <p>
        in (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) and (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) can be refined via the DESIGN model:
  =  0 +  1  +  2  +  3  2 +  4  2 +    +  
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        )
where   model spatial ionospheric variations,   and   are longitudinal and latitudinal diferences, 
captures temporal variations, and   is noise.
      </p>
      <p>The pseudorange and carrier phase diferences are further expressed as:
Δ   = 
ΔΦ = 
  − √(  −  ,−1 )2 + (  −  ,−1 )2 + (  −  ,−1 )2
  − √(  −  ,−1 )2 + (  −  ,−1 )2 + (  −  ,−1 )2
where (  ,   ,   )and ( ,−1
,  ,−1</p>
      <p>,  ,−1 )are satellite and receiver positions.</p>
      <p>
        The PPP-RTK state vector is then:
  − 
= (   
   
  ,
  
 
   )


(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        )
2.2. 5G Measurement Model
The 5G standard defines downlink Positioning Reference Signals (PRS) for DL-TDOA-based
multilateration. Base stations broadcast PRS after receiving assistance data, including their locations. The UE
cross-correlates the received PRS with a local sequence to estimate arrival times and compute DTDOA.
With MIMO antennas, DOA can be estimated using the LAMBDA method.
      </p>
      <p>As signal acquisition is not the focus of this work, technical details are omitted. When the 5G receiver
detects  signals at time  , the 5G measurement model is:

Z5 [] = [   ,   ,   ] = h5 (s ) +n5 []

s = [X , V , A ,   ,   ]</p>
      <p>T</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>The state vector at time  is:</title>
        <p>azimuth and elevation, respectively. n5 [] represents measurement noise.</p>
        <p>Here,</p>
        <p>=    −   1 is the time-diference between base stations  and 1. The angles   and   denote
where X , V , and A are the 3D position, velocity, and acceleration, respectively;   and   denote</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>GNSS clock ofset and skew. The nonlinear 5G measurement function is:</title>
        <p>h5 (s ) =⎢
⎡
⎢
⎢
⎢
⎢
⎣
⎢arctan (

 −  1 +</p>
        <p>arctan (
Δ   )
Δ 
Δ 
√(Δ  )2 + (Δ   )2 ⎦
⎤
⎥
⎥
⎥
⎥
⎥
)⎥
where   is the distance to base station  :

 = √(Δ  )2 + (Δ   )2 + (Δ  )2</p>
        <p>Given low-cost 5G oscillators, clock drift relative to GNSS must be compensated. The clock ofset
evolves as:</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Clock skew follows a first-order autoregressive model:</title>
        <p>=  −1 +   Δ
  =  ⋅  −1 +  
where  is set to 1, and   ∼  (0,   2)is white Gaussian noise.
3. Proposed Approach
We propose a GNSS-5G hybrid positioning framework leveraging multi-rate fusion, designed to enhance
positioning accuracy and robustness. The framework integrates the following core components:
• Dynamic Motion Model Switching: An adaptive strategy that switches between constant
velocity (CV) and constant acceleration (CA) models based on real-time vehicle dynamics, ensuring
accurate state prediction in varying motion conditions.
• Distance-Dependent Noise Modeling: A noise adaptation mechanism that adjusts observation
noise covariance in the Kalman filter according to the varying distances between the user and 5G
base stations, improving the reliability of 5G-based measurements.
• Fast Covariance Intersection (FCI) Fusion: An eficient fusion algorithm that combines
GNSS and 5G positioning estimates without requiring iterative optimization, ensuring robust
performance even under partial observability.</p>
        <p>Furthermore, we incorporate a multi-rate mode switching mechanism that dynamically selects the
optimal positioning strategy based on the availability and quality of GNSS and 5G signals. This design
ensures consistent, reliable performance across complex urban environments.
3.1. Dynamic Motion Model Switching
We propose a Dynamic Motion Model Switching (DMMS) framework that adaptively switches between
CV and CA models by analyzing velocity and acceleration. The selection rule is:</p>
        <p>Model Selection =
⎪
⎩
⎧CV Model,
⎨⎪CA Model,
|V ⋅ A |
‖V ‖2 + 
|V ⋅ A |
‖V ‖2 + 
&lt; 
≥</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>The system state evolves according to:</title>
        <p>s = A ⋅ s−1 + B + W

where A is selected as either ACV or ACA, depending on the switching rule, and W is Gaussian process
noise.</p>
        <p>The CV model uses a transition matrix ACV that accounts for position, velocity, and clock drift:
ACV = ⎢⎢⎡⎢I300×3
⎣ 0
Δ ⋅ I3×3</p>
        <p>I3×3</p>
        <p>0
Δ −1 ⋅ I3×3 0
0
0
0
0</p>
        <p>⎤
0 ⎥
0 ⎥⎥ ,
A ⎦</p>
        <p>
          A = [
1 Δ
0 
Here, A models clock bias as in (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ), (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ). Acceleration changes do not afect velocity or position
updates in this model.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>The corresponding process noise covariance matrix QCV is:</title>
        <p>where Q , U, and L are standard formulations capturing process noise.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-6">
        <title>Similarly, the CA model uses the transition matrix ACA:</title>
        <p>QCV = [ 0</p>
        <p>Q

0
0
U
0
0</p>
        <p>L
ACA = [0</p>
        <p>I Δ ⋅ I
0
Δ22 ⋅ I
Δ ⋅ I ]
3.2. Dynamic Noise Covariance Modeling</p>
        <p>This simplified formulation retains key equations and modeling insights while reducing redundancy.
nents, each modeled as independent zero-mean Gaussian variables:
Observation noise is a critical factor afecting positioning accuracy. Traditional EKF methods typically
assume fixed noise covariance, which neglects variations caused by changes in sensor-target geometry
and environmental conditions. To address this, we incorporate a distance-dependent noise model based
on the Cramér–Rao Lower Bound (CRLB), improving the robustness of 5G-based localization.</p>
        <p>At time step  , the 5G measurement noise vector n5 [] comprises TDOA and DOA noise
compo ,1 ∼  (0,  ,21 ),  , ∼  (0,  ,2 ),  , ∼  (0,  ,2 )
The CRLBs for TOA and DOA are given by [9, 10, 11, 12]:

2
 =
  2 =
4 2 ⋅   ⋅  3 ⋅ SNR
,  ,2 =</p>
        <p>2
8 2 ⋅   ⋅  ⋅</p>
        <p>SNR
16 2 ⋅  
  ⋅ 10  /10
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-7">
        <title>Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is modeled using the path loss model [13]:</title>
        <p>2



0
R

0
R = [ 0</p>
        <p>R

0
0
with the process noise covariance matrix QCA defined as:
 =  −1 + ,  = 1 ∶  
  =  −1 +  
where  denotes the GNSS epoch index (starting from 0), and   =</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-8">
        <title>GNSS sampling rates. This ratio must be an integer.</title>
        <p>5 represents the ratio of 5G and
DOA:
where   = 1 is the reference distance.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-9">
        <title>Thus, the observation noise covariance matrix R is constructed as:</title>
        <p>By combining these relationships, we obtain the distance-dependent noise variances for TDOA and
  2 =   2 (</p>
        <p>)
,   2 =   2 (</p>
        <p>)
,  2 =   2 (</p>
        <p>)</p>
        <p>This distance-aware model dynamically adjusts measurement noise according to the relative geometry
between the user and 5G base stations, enhancing localization reliability and adaptability under varying
signal conditions.
3.3. FCI-AEKF-based filtering process
5G systems typically rely on GPS as the primary time synchronization source, with synchronization
errors generally within tens of nanoseconds [15]. In real vehicular environments, timing deviations
may be negligible, and thus, this work assumes perfect synchronization for simplicity. In our fusion
framework, the GNSS and 5G measurements are processed in two stages, each at diferent sampling
rates.</p>
        <p>
          In the first stage of FCI-AEKF, the time index of 5G measurements is defined as:
3.3.1. First Stage of FCI-AEKF
In the first stage, the FCI-AEKF predicts states using 5G TDOA and DOA measurements based on (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ),
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ), and (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ):
Here, A and Q depend on the selected motion model. The posterior update follows:
s5− [] =A ⋅ s5+ [ − 1] +B
        </p>
        <p>P5− [] =AP5+ [ − 1]AT + Q5 []
K5 [] =P5− []H5⊤ [](H5 []P5− []H5⊤ [] +R[])−1
s5+ [] =s5− [] +K5 [](Z5 [] −h5 (s5− []))</p>
        <p>P5+ [] =(I − K5 []H5 [])P5− []
where H5 []is the Jacobian matrix of h5 .
3.3.2. Second Step of FCI-AEKF
The second stage uses s5+ []as the reference position X and solves the PPP-RTK state via weighted
least squares:</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-10">
        <title>To fuse results, FCI combines the 5G and satellite solutions:</title>
        <p>sppp-rtk[] = (HsatRs−a1tHsat)
−1</p>
        <p>HsatRs−a1tysat[]
Pppp-rtk[] = (HsatRs−a1tHsat)
−1
P[] = ( 5 [] P5− 1[] +  sat[] Ps−a1t[] )
−1
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-11">
        <title>The final fused estimate is:</title>
        <p>5 [] =
‖P5− 1[] + Ps−a1t[]‖ − ‖ Ps−a1t[]‖ + ‖ P5− 1[]‖
2‖P5− 1[] + Ps−a1t[]‖</p>
        <p>,  sat[] = 1 −  5 []
ŝ[] =  5 P[] P5− 1[] s5 [] +  satP[] Ps−a1t[] ssat[]</p>
        <p>Here, ssat[] = X +  X . The fused estimate ŝ[] is updated at the satellite sampling rate  sat.
3.4. Positioning Mode Switching Strategy
To enhance multi-rate GNSS/5G positioning, we propose a dynamic mode switching strategy that
leverages high-rate 5G TDOA/DOA measurements and adapts to variations in GNSS and 5G signal
conditions. The system operates in three modes according to signal availability: (i) GNSS/5G fusion
mode, where 5G predictions are fused with GNSS updates using FCI-AEKF; (ii) 5G-only mode, activated
when fewer than six GNSS satellites are visible; and (iii) PPP-RTK mode, used when fewer than
two line-of-sight (LOS) 5G base stations are available. This adaptive mechanism ensures robust and
continuous positioning across diverse and challenging environments, maintaining high accuracy even
under degraded signal conditions.</p>
        <p>The multi-rate switchover scheme for GNSS and 5G hybrid positioning is detailed in Algorithm 1.
Algorithm 1 Multi-rate switchover algorithm for GNSS/5G hybrid positioning</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-12">
        <title>Input: Initial state [0], GNSS observations, 5G measurements</title>
        <p>Output: Fused positioning state  ̂+ []
1: for each GNSS epoch  = 1 to  do
2: Compute RSRP of all base stations
3.5. Results and Discussion
3.5.1. Experiment Setup
To evaluate the proposed FCI-AEKF algorithm, a vehicle-based field experiment was conducted around
the Haidian campus of Beijing Normal University. A GNSS-5G receiver was mounted on a car, and
GNSS measurements were collected at 1 Hz during driving. Distances and angles from simulated 5G
base stations to the user equipment (UE) were computed based on ground-truth positions. Synthetic
noise was then added to emulate realistic 5G measurement errors. Hybrid positioning was performed
by fusing actual GNSS observations with simulated 5G data.
3.5.2. Performance Comparison
3.6. Conclusions
This paper presents the FCI-AEKF framework for GNSS/5G hybrid positioning. By fusing high-rate
5G and GNSS data, the algorithm efectively improves positioning accuracy while maintaining low
computational complexity. It also integrates an adaptive motion model switching mechanism and a
distance-based noise model to enhance robustness.</p>
        <p>Field experiments confirm that FCI-AEKF outperforms conventional GNSS-5G methods, providing
lower errors and higher reliability, particularly in challenging environments with limited GNSS visibility.</p>
        <p>Overall, the proposed FCI-AEKF demonstrates strong potential for improving positioning performance
and system stability in complex real-world scenarios, ofering a promising solution for precise GNSS/5G
integration.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China underGrant
No.2022YFB3904700.</p>
      <p>Declaration on Generative AI
The authors declare that AI tool was used to assist in improving the language fluency of this paper. All
contents, ideas, and conclusions are the authors’ own, and the AI tool did not contribute to the scientific
results or analysis.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Wymeersch</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Seco-Granados</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Destino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Dardari</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Tufvesson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>5G mmWave Positioning for Vehicular Networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>24</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>6</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>80</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>86</lpage>
          , Dec.
          <year>2017</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/MWC.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <volume>1600374</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Campolo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Blaga</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Rea</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Lozano</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Costa-Pérez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>“5GNSS: Fusion of 5G-NR and GNSS Localization for Enhanced Positioning Accuracy</article-title>
          and Reliability,
          <source>” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>73</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>9</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>13558</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>13568</lpage>
          , Sept.
          <year>2024</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/TVT.
          <year>2024</year>
          .
          <volume>3396991</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Destino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Saloranta</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Seco-Granados</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Wymeersch</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Performance Analysis of Hybrid 5G-GNSS Localization</article-title>
          ,”
          <year>2018</year>
          52nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, USA,
          <year>2018</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>8</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>12</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/ACSSC.
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <volume>8645207</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>“A GNSS/5G Integrated Three-Dimensional Positioning Scheme Based on D2D Communication,” Remote Sensing</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>14</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>6</issue>
          , p.
          <fpage>1517</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
            del
            <surname>Peral-Rosado</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>“Methodology for Simulating 5G</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>GNSS</given-names>
            <surname>High-Accuracy</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Positioning</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,” Sensors, vol.
          <volume>18</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>10</issue>
          , p.
          <fpage>3220</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Guo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Sun</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and J. Liu, “
          <article-title>5G/GNSS Integrated Vehicle Localization With Adaptive Step Size Kalman Filter,”</article-title>
          <source>IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>73</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>11</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>16531</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>16542</lpage>
          , Nov.
          <year>2024</year>
          , doi: 10.1109/TVT.
          <year>2024</year>
          .
          <volume>3421383</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhao</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>“Refining Ionospheric Delay Modeling for Undiferenced and Uncombined GNSS Data Processing</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” Journal of Geodesy</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>93</volume>
          , pp.
          <fpage>545</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>560</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Goodarzi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Cvetkovski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Maletic</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Gutiérrez</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and E. Grass, “
          <article-title>A Hybrid Bayesian Approach Towards Clock Ofset and Skew Estimation in 5G Networks,”</article-title>
          <source>in Proc. 2020 IEEE 31st Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC)</source>
          , London, UK,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7</lpage>
          , doi: 10.1109/PIMRC48278.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>9217175</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Lanzisera</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Pister</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>RF Ranging for Location Awareness,”</article-title>
          <source>Ph.D. dissertation</source>
          , University of California, Berkeley,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Lanzisera</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Zats</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K. S. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Pister</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Radio frequency time-of-flight distance measurement for low-cost wireless sensor localization</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” IEEE Sensors Journal</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>11</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>3</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>837</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>845</lpage>
          , Mar.
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Peshkov</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Nechaev</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Estimation and Minimization of the Cramer-Rao lower bound for radio direction-finding on the azimuth and elevation of planar antenna arrays</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” Journal of Communications Software and Systems</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>15</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>4</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>317</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>328</lpage>
          , Dec.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Richards</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>1</volume>
          , New York, NY, USA:
          <string-name>
            <surname>McGraw-Hill</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. T. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Docomo</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>5G Channel Model for Bands up to 100 GHz,”</article-title>
          <source>Technical Report</source>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>[14] Committee on Evolution of Untethered Communications, “The Evolution of Untethered</source>
          Communications,” National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA,
          <year>1997</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>“Time Synchronization for 5G and TSN Integrated Networking,”</article-title>
          <source>IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications</source>
          ,
          <year>2025</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Franken</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hupper</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Improved Fast Covariance Intersection for Distributed Data Fusion,”</article-title>
          <source>Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Information Fusion (FUSION)</source>
          ,
          <source>vol. 1</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>8</lpage>
          , IEEE,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>