<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Research Projects Exhibition at the International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, June</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>ProAmbitIon, reloaded: A two-year retrospection</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marco Franceschetti</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ronny Seiger</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Luciano García-Bañuelos</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Barbara Weber</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Computer Science</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Tecnológico de Monterrey</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="MX">Mexico</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Institute of Computer Science, University of St.Gallen</institution>
          ,
          <country country="CH">Switzerland</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <fpage>6</fpage>
      <lpage>20</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The rapid digital transformation of business processes holds significant promise for enhancing process automation, analysis, and optimization. However, digital traces of real-world processes-particularly those involving human activities-are frequently incomplete, thereby constraining the capabilities for automated process analysis. With the ProAmbitIon project, we address this challenge by leveraging the Internet of Things (IoT) to bridge the gap between real-world process executions and their digital representations. First, by augmenting the process environment with sensors, we enable a fine-grained monitoring and contextualization of process activities. Next, by generating and enriching digital traces from and with IoT data, we enable online conformance checking without depending on traditional information systems. With the development of new approaches for IoT-driven process conformance checking, we also address the issue of ambiguities originating from process-related artifacts. The project is validated through real-world scenarios from healthcare and manufacturing. We report on the results and insights from the first two years of the project, and outline current work and next steps.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Process Mining</kwd>
        <kwd>Conformance Checking</kwd>
        <kwd>Explainability</kwd>
        <kwd>Internet of Things</kwd>
        <kwd>Ambiguity in BPM</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Business processes instructing humans, software, and other resources of any kind how to interact and
execute specific activities to yield a specific business outcome are becoming increasingly digitized
and interwoven with the physical world [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1, 2</xref>
        ]. Conformance checking as a sub-discipline of process
mining empowers analysts with methods and tools to automatically detect deviations of process
executions–based on process event data [3]–from their normative formal description [3]. Traditionally,
conformance checking assumes the availability of an event log describing execution traces, which are
usually recorded by a Business Process Management System (BPMS) or some kind of process-aware
information system (PAIS). However, for real-world process executions that are not (fully) orchestrated
by such systems (e.g., in healthcare), event logs are unavailable, only partially available, or available at
an abstract and coarse-grained level, which challenges process conformance checking [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1, 4</xref>
        ]. This, in
turn, complicates planning, prediction, optimization, and adaptation in case of non-conformance. The
challenge is exacerbated by the focus of most conformance checking techniques on the post-mortem
event log analysis [3], which limits their applicability for timely analyses of executions in the real
world. Moreover, process descriptions instructing humans are rarely available as formalized models,
but rather as informal specifications presented through guidelines, checklists, or policies in natural
language [5]. As such, these process descriptions are inherently ambiguous, i.e., they allow for multiple
valid interpretations from a reader’s perspective [6]. Along with ambiguities in event logs [6], these
ambiguities pose a further challenge to conformance checking.
      </p>
      <p>The ProAmbitIon1 research project proposes to use the Internet of Things (IoT) to enable improved
monitoring and conformance checking of real-world processes that may exhibit ambiguity. Leveraging
sensors as new data sources installed in the process environment enables the sensing of process
executions in the physical world. Thereby, we can generate corresponding digital representations
(traces) that can be used for conformance checking in settings where traditionally event logs are
unavailable or unsuitable for analysis.</p>
      <p>The goals of the ProAmbitIon project (cf. [7]) are to:
• G1: Investigate how to enable domain experts to enrich process descriptions with IoT-related
execution aspects and use these for the monitoring of process elements.
• G2: Investigate how conformance checking can be used in the presence of ambiguities to check
the correctness of process executions and provide interpretable feedback to users.
In order to reach these goals, the project aims to answer the following four research questions:
• RQ1: How can domain experts be enabled to enrich informal process descriptions with IoT-related
execution criteria for event abstraction and correlation?
• RQ2: How can stream analysis techniques be used to derive process event logs and event streams
from possibly ambiguous IoT data?
• RQ3: How can conformance checking be used in both ofline and online settings on IoT-based
process event logs and streams that possibly contain ambiguities?
• RQ4: How can end-users be provided with understandable feedback about conformance regarding
process execution and with means for resolving remaining ambiguities?</p>
      <p>ProAmbitIon is a basic research project funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
within the SPIRIT framework. The project’s principal investigators are Barbara Weber (University of
St.Gallen) and Luciano García-Bañuelos (Tecnologico de Monterrey). The project has a duration of
three years, from 01.11.2022 until 31.10.2025.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Project objectives and tangible outputs</title>
      <p>The main objective of ProAmbitIon is the development of an IoT-based process monitoring and
conformance checking framework. The framework will allow to: (i) annotate informal process descriptions
with monitoring points that associate activities with IoT data; (ii) monitor and check conformance
of process executions from IoT data in the presence of ambiguity at runtime; (iii) provide end-users
with interpretable feedback on process conformance. Following design science research principles, the
project is set to produce the following revised set of artifacts:
• A framework for IoT-driven process event log and event stream generation.
• A catalog of IoT event patterns that relate process activities with low-level IoT data to facilitate
event abstraction [8].
• A domain-specific language (DSL) to annotate process descriptions with IoT pattern-based
monitoring points and to translate them into executable activity detection services.
• A software architecture for the abstraction of IoT event streams into process events [8].
• Alignment techniques for online conformance checking considering the presence of ambiguities
in process events derived from IoT data and in process specifications.
• Mechanisms for providing interpretable feedback about process conformance to visualize and
resolve ambiguities.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Relevance of the project</title>
      <p>
        ProAmbitIon addresses several open challenges at the intersection of BPM and IoT [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], especially
considering IoT data as basis to derive process-related information [4]. The project aims to advance the
state of the art of information systems engineering as follows.
      </p>
      <p>
        IoT devices, especially their sensors, serve as new data sources that enable a fine-grained and
augmented monitoring of both, automated and manual process activity executions, which reduces the
dependencies on fully-fledged PAISs or BPMSs. Furthermore, the developed methods for monitoring
and analysis have the potential of complementing existing BPMSs and PAISs by enriching process event
logs with IoT data [9], thereby providing further contextualization to event logs. By closing the gap
between real-world executions and their digital representations, the project helps to bridge event-based
and process-based systems as stated in the BP-meet-IoT manifesto [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] and it facilitates the development
of digital twins of business processes using IoT data [10]. Being one of the first projects to focus on
applying IoT technologies in the context of BPM, ProAmbitIon also aims to produce extensive datasets
for the two application domains manufacturing and healthcare–correlating data from IoT sensors with
process event data–and make these datasets openly available to the information systems research
community.
      </p>
      <p>In defining monitoring points [ 11] to abstract IoT events into process events for activity monitoring,
the project will contribute a catalog of IoT event patterns, which will facilitate further research in
information system analysis by means of pattern support. Furthermore, it will facilitate the systematic
development of novel event-based systems. With the DSL we aim to empower domain experts to
contribute their valuable expertise in information systems and IoT engineering–focusing on the
humanin-the-loop instead of aiming for full automation.</p>
      <p>In developing online conformance checking procedures capable of considering ambiguities,
ProAmbitIon will advance the state of the art of conformance checking with respect to concepts and procedures.
By targeting the healthcare domain, which is characterized by high human involvement and which
typically uses informal process descriptions, the project will explore novel approaches to presenting
conformance results and feedback to the end-users at runtime.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Current project status and intermediate results</title>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.1. Scenario definitions and IoT setups</title>
        <p>With ProAmbitIon, we explore new approaches for IoT-driven conformance checking. For validation we
consider the application domains of manufacturing and healthcare as the diversity of processes from
these domains (e.g., in terms of repetitiveness and variability, structuredness, or degree of automation)
allows us to demonstrate the generalizability of our solutions. In prior work [7], we presented suitable
scenarios for the two application domains as a first milestone.</p>
        <p>The manufacturing scenario involves an order-to-product process executed with a small-scale smart
factory in our lab [12]. Given the sequential nature and low variability of the process, we employ a
BPMN-based approach for its representation [12]. In similar production environments, data quality
and frequency vary significantly. Legacy machines, limited sensors, and independently controlled
devices–along with manual operations and human-machine collaborations–complicate the creation of
a consistent event log, particularly without a central process orchestrator or monitoring component [4].
This makes conformance checking, despite the process structuredness, a very challenging task [13].</p>
        <p>The healthcare scenario involves a blood donation process following the World Health Organization
guidelines, with a particular focus on adhering to hand hygiene guidelines [7]. Although the guidelines
dictate a strictly sequential process, real-world healthcare settings are frequently subject to unpredictable
disruptions (e.g., a donor fainting). These may force healthcare workers to deviate from the prescribed
sequence, interleave the execution of process instances, or repeat activities. This complexity presents
significant challenges for IoT-driven monitoring and conformance checking, particularly in associating
sensed data with the correct event and process instance [4]. To evaluate our contributions, we completed
a lab setup to monitor simulations of the blood donation process using a combination of IoT sensors
(e.g., proximity, motion, ambient light, and weight). Within this setup, we had to carefully balance the
privacy-invasiveness of sensors to employ for monitoring of activities and the accuracy with which we
are able to detect these activities and distinguish them from similar ones. Moreover, we acknowledge
that the installation and operation of additional IoT devices to monitor the activity executions requires
a comprehensive analysis of their impact on sustainability along diferent dimensions [ 14]. The final
process and lab setup were validated by domain experts from the Division of Infectious Diseases &amp;
Hospital Epidemiology of the Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>4.2. Activity Detection</title>
        <p>We address RQ2 on deriving process event logs and event streams with multiple research contributions,
advancing the state of the art in IoT-based activity detection following an extensive discussion of
associated challenges [4]. In [11], we present a conceptual metamodel for process monitoring and
conformance checking based on activities detected from IoT data. The metamodel links the BPM and
IoT worlds and discusses properties that process events derived from IoT data must meet to support
online monitoring and conformance checking. In [15], we propose a novel process to non-invasively
augment legacy IoT systems to facilitate IoT-based monitoring with simple domain-specific sensor
processing services for event abstraction.</p>
        <p>An extended interactive method leveraging domain expert knowledge for activity identification is
presented in [16]. It allows for the manual identification and annotation of activity signatures, i.e.,
patterns over a multivariate timeseries representing a prototypical activity execution in the IoT data.
Building on this method, in [17] we propose a framework to automatically generate activity detection
services from activity signatures and a service-based software architecture for execution. At their core,
the activity detection services leverage a complex event process (CEP) system to detect the occurrence of
relevant change patterns in the IoT data to identify the activities (i.e., their start, end, and intermediate
patterns). These change patterns relate to the combination and processing of low-level events emitted
from the IoT sensors that are deployed in the individual IoT setups. To alleviate the manual task of
annotating IoT data, in [18] we propose a semi-automated approach to detect activity signatures in
sensor data, providing suggestions to the annotator. As the approach assumes highly repetitive activities
with very little variability to identify repeated subsequences of symbols, it is particularly suitable for
the manufacturing scenario.</p>
        <p>To demonstrate the framework’s applicability, we implemented a prototype based on a CEP platform
enabling the online detection of activities from data streams in the manufacturing scenario. An
exemplary pattern in the IoT sensor data of the Oven production station in the factory involves one of
its motors changing its speed from 0 to 512 and a switch changing its state from 1 to 0 to indicate that
an execution of the Burn activity has started.</p>
        <p>In addition, we captured IoT data from multiple executions of the blood donation process in our lab
during a data collection workshop with medical students. We used these data for simulation and an
extended framework evaluation in [19], demonstrating the feasibility of the online activity detection
method. An exemplary pattern in the IoT sensor data here involves a scale registering a significant brief
increase of weight and a distance sensor noticing a person at close distance to derive the start of an
execution of the Sanitize Hands activity performed by a healthcare worker. Extensive datasets with
IoT timeseries data and process events for the manufacturing and healthcare scenarios are publicly
available in [20].</p>
        <p>Motivated by the need to assess the efectiveness of our activity detection methods, in [ 21] we present
a tool for comparing an event log derived from IoT data with an event log representing the ground truth
(generated, e.g., via a BPMS or manual tracking). The tool is publicly available and has an extensible
set of metrics for log comparison. It is suitable for the general, often encountered use case to compare
two process event logs with events stored in XES format with each other. This makes it applicable and
highly interesting for BPM and process mining related evaluations, beyond IoT-based activity detection.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>4.3. Ambiguity characterization</title>
        <p>We aim to address potential ambiguities originating from informal process descriptions and the lack of
process-awareness in IoT data. Therefore, to answer RQ2–RQ4, we set to deepen our understanding
of ambiguity in business processes. With the study presented in [6], we investigate diferent sources
of ambiguity in process artifacts–informal specifications, process models, and event logs–resulting
in a taxonomy of ambiguity. Furthermore, we discuss the potential cascading efects of ambiguity
in diferent process artifacts across the BPM lifecycle, increasing awareness about ambiguity. In an
empirical follow-up study [22], we demonstrate the adverse cognitive efects of ambiguity in process
models on the model readers. These results highlighted the need to address ambiguity across diferent
artifacts representing processes, as it can hinder process analytics at diferent levels and end-user
comprehension. Building on these results, in [23] we propose a framework toward enabling IoT-driven
ambiguity-aware conformance checking by leveraging the explicit representation of ambiguity. The
framework takes as input IoT data from sensors installed in the process environment and abstracts
these data into (partial) traces of process events explicitly representing ambiguity by encoding these
traces as Event Knowledge Graphs [24].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-4">
        <title>4.4. Conformance checking</title>
        <p>Addressing RQ3 on conformance checking of IoT-based event logs, in [25] we introduce an eficient
conformance checking approach that leverages the notion of optimal alignments, i.e., the commonalities
with the minimum number of diferences between two traces. The approach uses a text indexing
technique known as FM-index to eficiently compute all -bounded optimal alignments, i.e., alignments
with up to  diferences. This work marks a significant advancement in the state of the art of
conformance checking, since existing approaches return only few approximations of the optimal alignments.
Furthermore, the use of a  bound allows the proposed algorithm to be particularly eficient compared
to existing algorithms. This paves the way to alignment-based techniques for online conformance
checking.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-5">
        <title>4.5. Current work and insights</title>
        <p>As part of ongoing work, we have completed the development of the DSL empowering domain experts to
annotate process specifications. The DSL supports the specification of generic sensor-related monitoring
points to track the execution of activities and generate high-level process events for process mining [11],
thereby fully addressing RQ1. From these monitoring points, we generate activity detection services
based on CEP, similar to [17], and execute these services according to the proposed software architecture
to detect activity executions at runtime [17].</p>
        <p>One of the significant insights we got from working with the IoT data is that the quality of activity
executions is highly influenced by variations in the underlying IoT data [ 4]. These variations result in
slightly diferent sensor values and change patterns for executions of the same type of activity. While
we are able to anticipate and encode these variations with additional patterns, optional patterns, and
variability in patterns using the DSL (e.g., via discretizations and value ranges), the approach in [17]
that only relies on one prototypical execution of an activity instance is only able to handle variations in
execution times, but not in the sensor data itself. We are currently pursuing two diferent additional
approaches to make the activity detection methods more robust. The first relies on case-based reasoning
to classify and learn activity executions from previously observed occurrences (cases) stored in a case
base, and to then find matching cases based on similarity for unclassified, unknown IoT data [ 26].
Second, we are developing an extension of the automata-based method in [18] with error tolerance
by allowing matching activity patterns within an error margin as additional acceptable states of the
activity detection automatons, thus providing a more sophisticated answer to RQ2.</p>
        <p>We are investigating diferent approaches to check the conformance of ambiguous traces generated
from IoT event abstraction, thereby fully addressing RQ3. 1) The integration of event abstraction with
deep learning-based image processing methods: by activating cameras–in scenarios where they are
allowed (e.g., in controlled medical training settings)–on-demand, in case of detected ambiguities, we
capture and integrate rich activity contextualizations to aid ambiguity resolution. 2) The integration
of a formal representations of (partial) traces as Event Knowledge Graphs [24] with disambiguation
methods based on graph grammar constructs defined from domain knowledge. Toward answering RQ4
on providing interpretable feedback about the online conformance of traces to the end-users, we plan to
develop user-friendly interactive applications using diferent modalities in the last phase of the project.
The interface design will be based on a user-centered design process informed by the medical students’
feedback collected during data collection workshops.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>The adoption of IoT technologies enables the application of BPM concepts, methods, and techniques
to cyber-physical domains such as smart manufacturing and healthcare where real-world processes
exist but cannot (fully) benefit from BPM technologies. The ProAmbitIon project enables the IoT-driven
online monitoring and conformance checking of such processes, while considering ambiguities in the
respective process descriptions and event logs.</p>
      <p>The achievements from the first two project years advance the state of the art of information systems
engineering along several dimensions. The characterization and study of ambiguity in BPM shed light
on a–so far–understudied topic and promote the development of novel ambiguity-aware information
systems. Despite being challenged by variations in IoT data, the developed activity detection methods
bridge the gap between physical-world process executions and their digital representations, paving
the way for the convergence of event-based and process-based systems and digital twin development.
The method for eficiently computing all -bounded optimal alignments enables and stimulates further
research on online conformance checking methods. Furthermore, by posing compelling challenges for
monitoring and conformance checking, the manufacturing and healthcare processes promote further
research community engagement with problems arising from the IoT-BPM integration. Here we provide
support for further research endeavors through the published datasets, prototypes, and evaluation tool.</p>
      <p>The ongoing and planned research activities for the third project year aim to further advance the
state of the art of information systems engineering by providing a) a new language to encode domain
expertise and IoT data patterns, b) disambiguation methods, c) ambiguity-aware online conformance
checking, and d) end-user support in presenting conformance checking results. Overall, we are well on
track towards a successful completion of the research project.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This work has received funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation under Grant
No. IZSTZ0_208497 (ProAmbitIon project).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT in order to: Grammar and spelling
check, Paraphrase and reword. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content
as needed and take full responsibility for the publication’s content.
[2] B. Weber, A. Abbad-Andaloussi, M. Franceschetti, R. Seiger, H. Völzer, F. Zerbato, Leveraging digital
trace data to investigate and support human-centered work processes, in: Int. Conf. Evaluation of
Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, Springer, 2023, pp. 1–23.
[3] W. Van Der Aalst, A. Adriansyah, A. K. A. De Medeiros, F. Arcieri, T. Baier, , et al., Process mining
manifesto, in: BPM 2011 International Workshops, Springer, 2012, pp. 169–194.
[4] J. Mangler, R. Seiger, J.-V. Benzin, J. Grüger, Y. Kirikkayis, F. Gallik, L. Malburg, M. Ehrendorfer,
Y. Bertrand, M. Franceschetti, et al., From internet of things data to business processes: Challenges
and a framework, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08528 (2024).
[5] J. Becker, K. Bergener, O. Mueller, F. Mueller-Wienbergen, Documentation of flexible business
processes-a healthcare case study, AMCIS 2009 Proceedings (2009).
[6] M. Franceschetti, R. Seiger, H. A. López, A. Burattin, L. García-Bañuelos, B. Weber, A
characterisation of ambiguity in bpm, in: International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Springer, 2023,
pp. 277–295.
[7] M. Franceschetti, R. Seiger, M. J. G. González, E. Garcia-Ceja, L. A. R. Flores, L. García-Bañuelos,
B. Weber, Proambition: Online process conformance checking with ambiguities driven by the
internet of things., in: CAiSE Research Projects Exhibition, 2023, pp. 52–59.
[8] S. J. van Zelst, F. Mannhardt, M. de Leoni, A. Koschmider, Event abstraction in process mining:
literature review and taxonomy, Granular Computing 6 (2021) 719–736.
[9] J. Mangler, J. Grüger, L. Malburg, M. Ehrendorfer, Y. Bertrand, J.-V. Benzin, S. Rinderle-Ma, E.
Serral Asensio, R. Bergmann, Datastream xes extension: Embedding iot sensor data into extensible
event stream logs, Future Internet 15 (2023).
[10] F. Fornari, I. Compagnucci, M. C. De Donato, Y. Bertrand, H. H. Beyel, E. Carrión, M. Franceschetti,
W. Groher, J. Grüger, E. Kilic, et al., Digital twins of business processes: A research manifesto,
Internet of Things (2024) 101477.
[11] M. Franceschetti, R. Seiger, B. Weber, An event-centric metamodel for iot-driven process monitoring
and conformance checking, in: International Conference on Business Process Management,
Springer, 2023, pp. 131–143.
[12] R. Seiger, L. Malburg, B. Weber, R. Bergmann, Integrating process management and event
processing in smart factories: A systems architecture and use cases, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 63
(2022) 575–592.
[13] I. Beerepoot, C. Di Ciccio, H. A. Reijers, S. Rinderle-Ma, W. Bandara, et al., The biggest business
process management problems to solve before we die, Computers in Industry 146 (2023) 103837.
[14] M. Albert, A. Mestre, R. Seiger, V. Torres, P. Valderas, Sustainability in and through iot-enhanced
business processes, in: Proc. of the Best Dissertation Award, Doctoral Consortium, and
Demonstration &amp; Resources Forum at BPM 2024, volume 3758 of CEUR Workshop Proc., 2024, pp. 151–156.
[15] R. Seiger, M. Franceschetti, A. Abbad-Andaloussi, A process to non-invasively augment legacy iot
systems using business processes and microservices, in: Proceedings of the 14th International
Conference on the Internet of Things, 2024, pp. 1–9.
[16] R. Seiger, M. Franceschetti, B. Weber, An interactive method for detection of process activity
executions from iot data, Future Internet 15 (2023).
[17] R. Seiger, M. Franceschetti, B. Weber, Data-driven generation of services for iot-based online
activity detection, in: Service-Oriented Computing, Springer, 2023, pp. 186–194.
[18] L. García-Bañuelos, M. J. G. González, R. Seiger, M. Franceschetti, A. G. S. Trujillo, A
semiautomated approach to detecting process-level activities from sensor data, Procedia Computer
Science 257 (2025) 856–863.
[19] R. Seiger, A. F. Kurz, M. Franceschetti, Online detection of process activity executions from iot
sensors using generated event processing services, Available at SSRN 5165943 (2025). doi:10.
2139/ssrn.5165943.
[20] A. F. Kurz, R. Seiger, M. Franceschetti, Prototype of an iot-based activity detection service generator
with evaluation datasets, 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14860395.
[21] A. F. Kurz, R. Seiger, M. Franceschetti, B. Weber, Activity and sequence detection evaluation
metrics: A comprehensive tool for event log comparison, in: Proceedings of the Best Dissertation
Award, Doctoral Consortium, and Demonstration and Resources Forum at BPM 2024, 2024.
[22] M. Franceschetti, A. Abbad-Andaloussi, C. Schreiber, H. A. López, B. Weber, Exploring the
cognitive efects of ambiguity in process models, in: International Conference on Business Process
Management, Springer, 2024, pp. 493–510.
[23] M. Franceschetti, D. M. Buchegger, R. Seiger, B. Weber, Toward iot-based process analytics:
Extending event knowledge graphs with ambiguity, in: International Conference on Business
Process Modeling, Development and Support (to appear), Springer, 2025.
[24] D. Fahland, Process mining over multiple behavioral dimensions with event knowledge graphs,
in: Process Mining Handbook, Springer, 2022, pp. 274–319.
[25] A. Rivera-Partida, A. Armas-Cervantes, L. García-Bañuelos, L. Rodríguez-Flores, All optimal
kbounded alignments using the fm-index, in: International Conference on Cooperative Information
Systems, Springer, 2024, pp. 75–92.
[26] R. Seiger, A. Schultheis, R. Bergmann, Case-based activity detection from segmented internet of
things data, in: Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development - 33rd International Conference,
ICCBR 2025, Biarritz, France, June 30 - July 3rd, 2025, Proceedings., Lecture Notes in Computer
Science (LNCS), Springer, 2025. Accepted for Publication.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Janiesch</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Koschmider</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Mecella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Weber</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Burattin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Di Ciccio</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Fortino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Gal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
            <surname>Kannengiesser</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Leotta</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>The internet of things meets business process management: a manifesto</article-title>
          ,
          <source>IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine</source>
          <volume>6</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>34</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>44</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>