<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Integrating Digital and AI Literacy with Digital Citizenship across the Curriculum in Italian Schools</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Veronica Punzo</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33 56127 Pisa</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>88</fpage>
      <lpage>95</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The paper outlines future directions for collaborative curriculum design in the Italian educational context, where Artificial Intelligence (AI) serves not only as a content generator but also as a catalyst for bridging disciplinary boundaries. The future of AI is inherently unpredictable, presenting both benefits and threats that impact reality more significantly than other technologies. Nevertheless, we can learn to adapt our choices and organize our behaviors to influence the future. This is especially crucial in the educational sector, where a new literacy is necessary to afirm human intentionality as a key factor in interactions with technologies like AI. The proposed case study relates to the experimental introduction of the AI discipline at the Marconi-Pieralisi upper secondary school in Jesi (IT). This initiative, along with two other important recent reforms, represents a significant curricular innovation in the Italian educational landscape: the introduction of civic education as a compulsory subject in all schools in the country, and the reorganization of technical institutes. By reframing the case study, the paper proposes a pathway toward AI-mediated interdisciplinary curriculum integration.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;artificial intelligence</kwd>
        <kwd>interdisciplinary curriculum</kwd>
        <kwd>digital citizenship</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The digital technological revolution, which includes disruptive AI, significantly impacts all aspects
of social and political life [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. To educate for democracy, active citizenship grounded in conscience
and critical spirit must be strengthened [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. In this context, the role of the school becomes crucial
in designing learning experiences, beginning with the acquisition of digital skills to promote critical
and conscious active citizenship [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. This paper explores how AI and generative AI, are catalyzing
interdisciplinary shifts in educational design. Drawing on qualitative data from an Italian upper
secondary school curriculum initiative, it examines how educators at the Marconi-Pieralisi Institute in
Jesi are integrating AI into Computer Science and Civic Education courses, fostering interdisciplinary
connections and rethinking traditional subject boundaries. The use of AI reveals emerging opportunities
for designing curricula that foster transferable skills—such as critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and
data literacy—across diverse academic domains, ultimately nurturing active citizenship in a digital world.
The preliminary phase of this research, which focused on the same case study at the Marconi-Pieralisi
Technical Institute in Jesi, was previously presented at the Third Sustainable Development Conference
(SDC 2024) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. This article builds on that initial contribution while ofering a significantly new
perspective by addressing several research questions, employing a distinct analytical framework, and
focussing on the interdisciplinary integration of digital and artificial intelligence skills into curriculum
design.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Evolving digital and AI literacy in the European policy landscape</title>
      <p>
        Digital literacy is a critical educational issue for the development of knowledge society [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. It translates
into the ability to use new media and new technologies to actively participate in a now largely digitised
society [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], as well as to critically analyse the production and fruition of digital content, acting as
consciously on the Web [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. It overlaps with various related concepts, such as digital skills, digital
competencies, computer literacy, information literacy, media literacy [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. The European Commission
identifies digital competence as one of the Key Competences for Lifelong Learning, initially defined in
2006 and later updated by the Council Recommendation in 2018 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. Several European policy initiatives
underscore the importance of digital competence, such as the updated DigComp Framework (now
DigComp 2.2) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] as well as the Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] and the Digital Decade
Policy Programme 2030 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. Consequently, the European Union is actively working to develop both
basic and advanced digital skills to facilitate digital transformation and social inclusion. Digital literacy
forms the foundation of AI literacy, encompassing not only technical skills but also critical thinking,
ethical awareness, and inclusivity in an AI-driven world. Ng et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ] emphasise the lack of a clear
definition of AI literacy and call for efective teaching strategies that make its technical aspects more
accessible. Yi [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ] underlines the role of metacognition—reflecting on one’s own thinking—as crucial
for engaging critically with AI. A comprehensive approach to AI literacy should include understanding
fundamental concepts, interacting with intelligent systems, and assessing their societal implications.
In this context, the European Union has launched initiatives to enhance awareness of AI and data
in education, starting with the Ethical Guidelines for Educators on Using AI and Data in Teaching
and Learning [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ], aiming to increase awareness of AI and data in education. Digital literacy must
be redefined as a dynamic, future-oriented construct that integrates data fluency, ethical reasoning,
and the ability to navigate AI environments—moving beyond basic ICT skills. Schools and community
learning centers play a key role in developing these competencies by using digital technologies as tools
for creativity and active learning [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ]. They also help foster critical thinking, resilience, and support
families in guiding children’s use of technology. Expanding school access and investing in teacher
training can better connect internet use with educational opportunities, helping address the significant
digital skill gaps among younger students [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ] As early as 2014, the UN Committee on the Rights
of the Child recommended that member governments incorporate digital literacy into their national
school curricula [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ]. Today, this literacy must also encompass sustainability—such as energy-eficient
computing, awareness of cloud computing’s carbon footprint, and AI’s potential to support the UN
Sustainable Development Goals. Empowering students in this way enables them to understand their role
in promoting a socially and ecologically responsible use of technology. Altogether, these discussions
underscore the urgency of prioritizing digital and AI education to equip future generations with the
skills needed in a rapidly evolving digital society [19].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Framing Digital Citizenship in education: legal and conceptual foundations in Italy</title>
      <p>
        A common definition of digital citizenship is the promotion of responsible online behaviour as well as
civic and social justice engagement, which includes definitions that emphasise technological aspects
and digital skills [20]. As a result, digital citizenship education seeks to promote healthy and safe
behaviours while also encouraging proactive, reflective, and respectful attitudes towards online content
creation and self-expression [21]. As discussed above, the importance of responsible technology use
was acknowledged in 2006 and again in 2018 by the European Parliament [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. In Italy, the Ministry of
Education, Universities, and Research (MIUR) published a syllabus in 2018 to develop a Digital Civic
Education Curriculum. This syllabus emphasizes rethinking how people find and use information
and communication resources privately and publicly [21]. Another important contribution to the
development of digital citizenship education paths was made by Law 92/2019, which reintroduced civic
education into school curricula [22]. This legal framework integrates the teaching of digital literacy
with broader democratic competencies and aligns with European directives such as DigComp 2.2 [23].
For readers less familiar with the Italian school system, it is important to note that civic education has
recently become a transversal discipline, supported by national mandates and local experimentation.
The Guidelines for Teaching Civic Education [24] define digital citizenship as the need for all citizens
to develop media literacy skills in order to face the complexity and challenges of a constantly changing
society in which technology plays a critical role. Article 5 of Law No. 92/2019 [22] introduces digital
citizenship education, understood as the ability of an individual to consciously and responsibly use
virtual means of communication, and lists seven key areas of focus that align closely with DigComp
2.2 [23]. Legislative Decree No. 45/2025 [25], introduces another significant legislative innovation
in the Italian school system: the reform of technical upper secondary schools in Italy. This reform,
which will take efect in the 2026-27 school year, aims to align curricula with the demand for skills in
the manufacturing sector, with a focus on innovation related to Industry 4.0 and the profound digital
transformation that is taking place. The reorganisation, which will impact institutions like the I.I.S.
Marconi Pieralisi, the case study discussed in the paper, calls for the creation of a new technical institute
curriculum that will be split into two primary areas: a flexible address area devoted to acquisition and
a national general education area that will be shared by all paths and work to create a fundamental
culture that incorporates humanistic and scientific-technological elements. Law 92/2019 [ 22] on the
introduction of civic education and Legislative Decree No. 45/2025 [25], which reformed technical
institutes, are two essential and complementary pillars for the spread of comprehensive and responsible
digital and AI literacy. With an emphasis on digital innovation and Industry 4.0, as well as on preparing
students for STEM careers and professional degrees, the goal of technical institute reform is to match
training programmes with the demands of the productive enterprises. In addition, Law 92/2019 [22] on
civic education adds digital citizenship as one of its core thematic focal points, encouraging critical
media comprehension, thoughtful and responsible technology use, and knowledge of the dangers of
misinformation and data security. In this context, the two regulations intersect: while technician
reform provides the technical skills required to understand, develop, and implement digital technologies
and artificial intelligence, civic education provides the ethical, critical, and social framework for their
responsible use. The combination of these two legislative perspectives is critical for training students
who not only know how to use artificial intelligence and digital technologies, but also understand their
social, ethical, and legal implications, thus contributing to digital and AI literacy that truly empower
individuals to assert their rights and access equal opportunities in both digital and physical spaces,
fostering personal growth and addressing the issue of digital education [26].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Institutional Practices and Frameworks for Digital Citizenship in</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Italian Schools</title>
      <p>Alongside the creation of the Italian civic education regulatory framework, schools in Italy have taken
independent steps to create their own digital curricula that integrate the principles of digital citizenship.
During the 2017/2018 school year, school leaders from lower and upper secondary schools in Val di Non
and Val di Sole [27] formed a collaborative network to develop a shared digital citizenship curriculum.
Based on the DigComp 2.1 framework, the initiative aligns with best practices in ICT integration and
reflects the evolving nature of digital education. The curriculum follows a vertically integrated structure
from primary school to the first and second years of upper secondary school (which in Italy determines
the end of compulsory schooling). It is grounded in the belief that digital competence is as essential as
traditional academic skills, forming the foundation for responsible citizenship in a connected world.
This holistic approach underscores the relevance of digital literacy for students’ personal growth and
professional futures. Finalized in May 2022, the curriculum was validated by experts from the Provincial
Institute for Educational Research and Experimentation (IPRASE), confirming its educational quality and
alignment with regional and European standards. In a parallel initiative, educators from Valle d’Aosta
developed an alternative digital curriculum inspired by IPRASE’s work. Grounded in the latest DigComp
2.2 framework, the project ofers a structured approach to digital education with clear guidelines and
best practices tailored to diferent educational levels [ 28]. Also the "Vertical Digital Curriculum" covers
ifve "two-year" periods, from primary school to the first and second years of upper secondary school
(which in Italy determines the end of compulsory schooling), and is organized around the five DigComp
competence areas. Each area is divided into three components: competence development, learning
activities, and supporting resources. This flexible design provides an indicative progression path to
help schools shape inclusive and efective digital curricula. Both the Valle d’Aosta and Trentino-Alto
Adige projects promote digital competence not only as technical skill, but as essential to the ethical
and informed use of technology, including AI. These initiatives aim to equip students with the ability
to navigate the digital world with confidence, responsibility, and critical awareness, preparing them
to be active, socially responsible citizens. Finally, the paper presents a case study of the
MarconiPieralisi upper high school in Jesi, Marche region, where the AI discipline has been introduced into the
curriculum for fourth- and fifth-year students majoring in Computer Science and Telecommunications
[29]. This innovation was made possible by the Institute’s use of its school autonomy quota, which
allows Italian schools to integrate existing subject curricula while also introducing new subjects in
response to local needs and ongoing social transformations. The new teaching has many touching points
with civic education curriculum, which for fourth and fifth year students investigates the thematic core
of digital citizenship [29]. Through the combination of the two programmes, students are guided to
meet learning objectives pertaining to the development of basic skills, including: critically, responsibly,
and consciously accessing information, sources, and digital content; managing digital identities and
data online; safeguarding one’s own and others’ safety in digital environments, avoiding risks to one’s
physical and mental health; and analysing the issues surrounding the management of digital identities,
the right way. Both the digital citizenship core and the AI programme seek to equip students with
critical, responsible, and aware digital skills so they can successfully and safely navigate the digital world.
Although the Marconi Pieralisi Institute experience developed independently of the Trentino school
network’s and Valle d’Aosta educators’ digital curricula, the initiatives share some similarities. All of the
projects presented are dedicated to promoting digital competence, not only as a set of technical skills,
but also as an important orientation tool for the responsible and informed use of modern technologies.
By cultivating these skills, the initiatives hope to prepare students to navigate the complexities of the
digital landscape with confidence and integrity, resulting in a generation of technologically proficient
and socially responsible citizens. However, the Marconi Pieralisi Institute’s AI programme curriculum
has the added benefit of providing students with comprehensive and practical AI training, preparing
them to become competent and knowledgeable technology professionals (Appendix 1).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>5. Designing Digital and AI curricula: insigts from teachers involved in the AI teaching</title>
      <p>The study took a qualitative approach, with semi-structured interviews with three teachers involved
in AI and civic education programmes, as well as the school leader. The interviews sought to delve
deeply into the teachers’ perceptions, experiences, and visions about the significance and eficacy of
incorporating AI into teaching. The analysis sought to uncover shared meanings, perceived critical
issues, and future potential in order to gain a more in-depth understanding of the observed phenomena.</p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>5.1. Methodology</title>
        <p>
          The study included four unstructured narrative interviews conducted in May 2024 with teachers of
Civic Education and Computer Science, as well as the school leader. Participants were asked to reflect
on the rationale behind introducing AI, the design choices made, and the pedagogical challenges
encountered. The collected data were coded using a thematic analysis approach, focusing on emergent
categories such as interdisciplinarity, ethical concerns, assessment, and student engagement. Interviews
were audio-recorded and transcribed for qualitative synthesis. The qualitative data collection utilized
unstructured narrative interviews [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ] to explore the methods employed by teachers and management
to integrate AI within the educational context. The analysis focused on identifying recurring themes
and interrelated connections through key terminology. The interview covers a wide range of topics
related to integrating AI into the school curriculum, including teacher training and inclusiveness, as well
as the use of AI-based technologies, evaluation of their efectiveness, and documentation of work done.
The primary goal of the questions formulated and contained in Appendix 2) was to gain a thorough
and nuanced understanding of how AI is integrated into a technical institute’s curriculum.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-2">
        <title>5.2. Results and Insights</title>
        <p>Analysis of the interviews revealed five major themes: (1) The perceived need to align AI education
with civic values; (2) The challenge of balancing technical skills with ethical reflection; (3) Enthusiasm
for interdisciplinary teaching formats; (4) Concern about the lack of assessment tools for AI literacy.
Teachers emphasized the importance of collaboration across departments and proposed a progressive
path beginning with conceptual foundations in Civic Education and leading to hands-on data literacy
labs in Computer Science. These insights directly informed the design of a modular curriculum outlined
below. The ethical aspects of AI were also addressed in civic education classes to ensure that students
understood the technology’s potential and the ethical responsibilities that come with its application. The
experience with IA didactics resulted in an innovative operational suggestion for improving cooperative
and lab dynamics. The interviewees emphasised that inclusive design required teachers to recognise
and accommodate diversity in learning in order to fully develop students’ specific abilities and potential.
AI literacy entails raising students’ awareness of issues concerning the ownership and protection of
data contained in information collected and reused by artificial intelligence applications. According to
the philosophy teacher, taking a collaborative and practical approach to teaching AI involves mutually
enriching the student-teacher dialogue relationship. The narrative fragments emphasise the digital
curriculum’s interdisciplinary nature, highlighting its interactions with various fields of study while
also addressing the ethical and legal implications of acquiring digital skills and promoting collaboration
among teachers across all disciplines.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>6. Conclusions</title>
      <p>This contribution provides an overview of the implementation of digital citizenship education, focussing
on the Italian initiative to emphasise civic education’s interdisciplinary nature and AI teaching. This
approach is consistent with European and international frameworks for citizenship education,
encouraging the integration of digital technologies into various discipline syllabi. This prepares students to
face modern challenges and become informed, competent citizens in the digital age. Digital citizenship
education emphasises the importance of both technical and critical reading skills, allowing students
to understand information processes and interact with technology in an ethical and responsible way.
This encourages active social participation and enables students to make meaningful contributions to
society. This educational approach relies heavily on interdisciplinary curriculum integration, which
connects content, methods, and language from various academic disciplines around common themes,
challenges, or experiences. This method goes beyond the traditional separation of subjects—such as
math, science, and literature—to demonstrate how they influence and complement one another. A
thematic or problem-based approach promotes meaningful and contextualised learning by connecting
subjects through central themes or real-world problems. Furthermore, this integration promotes
collaboration among teachers from various disciplines, resulting in a cohesive curriculum that overcomes the
traditional separation of subjects. Incorporating data analysis and artificial intelligence (AI) into this
interdisciplinary framework promotes transversal learning by serving as a bridge between disciplines
such as statistics, computer science, economics, and biology. This integrated approach allows students
to collaborate on complex problems while also developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Furthermore, AI and data analysis promote innovation and creativity by allowing students to discover
new connections between disciplines and inspiring the creation of novel models, solutions, and
knowledge. In summary, interdisciplinary curriculum integration provides an educational model that extends
beyond traditional subject boundaries to create more meaningful and relevant learning experiences.
The incorporation of data analytics and AI expands on this potential, forging connections between
disciplines and preparing students to efectively address the complex challenges of the modern world.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>During the preparation of this work, the authors used Grammarly and Quillbot for grammar and spelling
checks. After using these tools, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and took full
responsibility for the content of the publication.
[19] J. Hong, K. Kim, Impact of aiot education program on digital and ai literacy of elementary school
students, Education and Information Technologies 30 (2025) 107–130.
[20] L. M. Jones, K. J. Mitchell, Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship, New media &amp; society
18 (2016) 2063–2079.
[21] U. Ministry of Education, Research, Curriculum for digital civic education, 2018. Curriculum for</p>
      <p>Education Digital Civics.
[22] I. Government, Law no. 92, 20 august 2019: Introduction of school teaching of civic
education, Gazzetta Uficiale della Repubblica Italiana, 2019. GU General Series n.195 of 21-08-2019,
(19G00105).
[23] R. Vuorikari, S. Kluzer, Y. Punie, DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens –
With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes, Publications Ofice of the European Union,
Luxembourg, 2022. URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC128415.
[24] M. of Education, I. Merit, Ministerial decree no. 183 of 7 september 2024: Adoption of the guidelines
for the teaching of civic education, Gazzetta Uficiale della Repubblica Italiana, 2024. Adoption of
the Guidelines for the Teaching of Civic Education.
[25] Decreto-legge convertito con modificazioni dalla l. 5 giugno 2025, n. 79, Gazzetta Uficiale della</p>
      <p>Repubblica Italiana, 2025. (25G00059) (GU n.81 del 07-04-2025).
[26] S. Pasta, P. C. Rivoltella, et al., " superare la “povertà educativa digitale". ipotesi di un nuovo
costrutto per la cittadinanza digitale, in: La formazione degli insegnanti: problemi, prospettive
e proposte per una scuola di qualità e aperta a tutti e tutte, Pensa MultiMedia Editore, 2022, pp.
600–604.
[27] P. I. for Educational Research, E. of the Italian Region of Trentino-Alto Adige, Curriculum for the
development of digital competence, Online, 2022. URL: https://curriculum-digitale.iprase.tn.it/,
accessed on 09/07/2025.
[28] S. e. e. P. p. l. r. i. Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta, Assessorato Beni e attività culturali, D. S. agli
Studi Uficio Supporto all’Autonomia Scolastica, Curriculum per lo sviluppo della competenza
digitale, Online, 2025. URL: https://curricolo-digitale.scuole.vda.it/, accessed on 09/07/2025.
[29] M.-P. H. E. Institute, Three-year plan training ofer: 2022 – 2025 (ptof), Online, 2022. URL: https:
//www.iismarconipieralisi.edu.it/didattica/oferta-formativa/piano-oferta-formativa, accessed on
09/07/2025.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>A. Appendix 1</title>
      <p>B. Appendix 2
1. Could you retrace the steps that led to the integration of AI into your school’s ITd telecommunications
technical programme?
2. How were the teachers and classes that participated in the experiment identified?
3. Was training ofered and, if applicable, given to the teachers involved? If so, what were the methods
and timeframe? What inclusive learning communication methods were implemented? And is there any
additional refresher or follow-up training planned?
4. What about the types of diversity in the classroom, such as age, background, internal dynamics, and
relationships with teachers?
5. How do teachers’ commitment and presence change in response to the opportunities presented by
the use of AI-based technologies?
6. What criteria are used to assess the impact of AI implementation on the vertical curriculum of the
school’s technical specialisation in IT and telecommunications?
7. According to the school’s PTOF, the cross-curricular civic education curriculum for fourth and fifth
grades focusses on the thematic cores of digital citizenship and the Constitution, law (national and
international), legality, and solidarity for fifth graders, which include topics such as profiling and
cybersecurity.</p>
      <p>What are your thoughts on raising awareness among students and teachers about issues concerning
data ownership and protection in information collected and reused by AI applications? 8. What do you
believe are the most important steps towards new literacy to address digital educational poverty, which
is defined as a lack of digital skill acquisition?</p>
      <p>B List of segments
The following segments were translated from Italian into English.
1. The Computer Science department proposed introducing AI as a subject to better prepare students
for university and meet external needs. Approval from the Teachers’ Board was required, emphasizing
teamwork and management consensus.
2. Discipline planning focused on standard content, despite no specific guidelines. In-house training
was crucial for teachers to understand both the historical and technical aspects of AI.
3. The Institute plans to introduce AI as a separate subject in its three-year computer science curriculum,
leveraging the expertise of teachers who studied AI extensively. [. . . ] Recognizing the importance
of preparing students for future challenges, the Institute has noted a demand for AI skills from local
companies, highlighting its role as a regional educational resource.
4. The goal is not to train experts in AI, but rather to provide students with the skills to debunk clichés
and understand AI as a useful technological tool.
5. Introducing AI in the curriculum requires structured practical and lab activities to foster experiential
learning and enhance student understanding.
6. Lessons are structured to alternate practical applications with theoretical aspects, focusing on
developing students’ ability to independently research and complete work within a set timeframe.
7. For students with special educational needs, the lab ofers signicfiant advantages, as computers
often serve as a compensatory tool. However, some students may struggle, so we’ve implemented
cooperative work in pairs to support classmates with fragile needs through tutoring. 8. The teaching of
the IA discipline in classrooms primarily focuses on workshop activities to enhance communication
and promote inclusiveness.
9. AI has also been integrated into the civic education curriculum where the ethical aspects of the
application of technology are mainly addressed. It is important that students understand the ethical
and social implications of AI, not only as a technological tool, but also as something that can influence
everyday life and social dynamics.
10. The students were unfamiliar with philosophy, which allowed them to freely express their views.
This led to an interesting mutual learning experience between us. We engaged in a philosophical
dialogue about the ethical rules and principles that should guide the development of artificial
intelligence systems for lawful purposes.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Balbi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Magaudda</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Storia dei media digitali: rivoluzioni e continuità, Gius</article-title>
          . Laterza &amp; Figli
          <string-name>
            <surname>Spa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Spadafora</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Processi didattici per una nuova scuola democratica</article-title>
          , volume
          <volume>1</volume>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Anicia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Riva</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Nativi digitali</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Crescere ed apprendere nel mondo dei nuovi media</article-title>
          , volume
          <volume>218</volume>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>RCS MediaGroup SpA Divisione Media</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Punzo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Data citizenship and data literacy: The challenges of the artificial intelligence era</article-title>
          , in: S. democratica (Ed.),
          <source>Proceedings of the Third International Conference of the journal Scuola democratica. Education and/for Social Justice</source>
          . Vol.
          <volume>2</volume>
          : Cultures, Practices, and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Change</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Associazione Per Scuola Democratica</source>
          ,
          <year>2025</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>72</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>84</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Banzato</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Analisi critica degli approcci di ricerca della literacy pedagogy</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Formazione &amp; insegnamento 3</source>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
          <fpage>123</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>138</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Rivoltella</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Nuovi alfabeti</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Educazione e culture nella società post-mediale</article-title>
          , volume
          <volume>124</volume>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Scholé-Morcelliana</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Pasta</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Postverità e datificazione: nuove conoscenze e nuove consapevolezze dall'educazione civica digitale, Scholé: rivista di educazione e studi culturali: LIX, 1</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>51</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>63</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Alexander</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Adams</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Cummins</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Digital literacy: An NMC Horizon project strategic brief</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Technical Report, The New Media Consortium</source>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>of the European Union, Council recommendation of 22 may 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (text with eea relevance)</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Oficial Journal of the European Union</source>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          . 2018/C 189/01.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ferrari</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Punie</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Digcomp: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in europe</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Commission</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Digital Education Action Plan</source>
          <year>2021</year>
          -2027:
          <article-title>Resetting education and training for the digital age</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Technical Report COM</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ) 624,
          <string-name>
            <surname>European</surname>
            <given-names>Commission</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Parliament</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>of the European Union, Decision (eu) 2022/2481 of the european parliament and of the council of 14 december 2022 on the digital decade policy programme 2030</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Oficial Journal of the European Union</source>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Long</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Magerko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>What is ai literacy? competencies and design considerations</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems</source>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>16</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Yi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Establishing the concept of ai literacy</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Jahr-European Journal of Bioethics</source>
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>353</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>368</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>European</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Commission</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Culture, Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators, Publications Ofice of the European Union</article-title>
          , Luxembourg,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Chaudron</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. Di</given-names>
            <surname>Gioia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Gemo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Young Children (0-8) and Digital Technology: A qualitative study across Europe, EUR 29070 EN, Publications Ofice of the European Union</article-title>
          , Luxembourg,
          <year>2017</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .2760/294383(online),
          <volume>10</volume>
          .2760/245671(print),
          <year>jRC110359</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Byrne</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Kardefelt-Winther</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Livingstone</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Stoilova</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Global Kids Online research synthesis,
          <source>2015-2016, Research Report, UNICEF Ofice of Research-Innocenti and London School of Economics and Political Science</source>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>on the Rights of the Child, Day of general discussion on digital media and children's rights</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Online</source>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          . URL: https://www.ohchr.org/en/events/days-general
          <string-name>
            <surname>-</surname>
          </string-name>
          discussion-dgd/
          <year>2014</year>
          / 2014-day
          <article-title>-general-discussion-digital-media-and-childrens, accessed from the Ofice of the High Commissioner for Human Rights</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>