<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A Hybrid Robotic and Mobile System to Promote Deep Breathing Exercise Adherence</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Elie Maalouly</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Alessandra Rossi</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Silvia Rossi</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University of Naples Federico II</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Via Claudio 21, 80125 Naples</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Neuroscience and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Zona Ospedaliera</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Via Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Patients recovering from heart surgery often experience pulmonary complications that can be alleviated through deep breathing exercises (DBE), yet adherence to these exercises remains low. This study presents a novel system designed to increase adherence to DBE by combining a physical humanoid robot (NAO) with a mobile application featuring a virtual robot avatar. The system is grounded in the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) of behavior change, enabling personalized engagement strategies based on an individual's readiness to adopt new health behaviors. A short-term simplified preliminary trial with 15 healthy participants evaluated the feasibility and user reception of the system. Participants interacted with the NAO robot in an initial session, followed by daily use of the mobile app for one week. Results indicated full adherence of the 15 participants to the daily DBE regimen with an average app daily usage time between 6 and 12 minutes, as well as significant reductions in perceived stress scores from an average of 21.7 to an average of 11.5 on the scale of perceived stress, and high user satisfaction across multiple usability metrics. These findings suggest that this approach is promising in supporting the maintenance of health-promoting behaviors. Future work will involve long-term clinical trials integrating the full TTM-based personalization and comparing the efects of physical versus virtual robotic agents.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Human-Robot Interaction</kwd>
        <kwd>Socially Assistive Robotics</kwd>
        <kwd>Health-Behavior Change</kwd>
        <kwd>Virtual Robot Avatar</kwd>
        <kwd>Trantheoretical Model</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Patients undergoing heart surgery may experience a number of consequences, such as restrictive
pulmonary impairment and early postoperative gas exchange issues. Programs for cardiac rehabilitation
(CR) are frequently utilized to mitigate or prevent these efects. A range of deep breathing exercises
(DBE) are advised, particularly for patients who breathe on their own, to lessen atelectasis and enhance
lung function in the initial postoperative period [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        While CR programs have been shown to be efective, it is well-documented that patient adherence
to these programs is poor [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2, 3</xref>
        ]. Some studies even reported adherence to be lower than 50% [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref5 ref6">4, 5, 6</xref>
        ].
Low levels of social and practical support in addition to a lack of motivation have been linked to
non-adherence to CR [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. Efective medication adherence tactics, such as boosting patient self-eficacy,
treatment belief, and social support, are likely to be closely mirrored in successful CR adherence
strategies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. DBE would probably benefit from additional medication adherence techniques as well,
such as routines and cues like hourly smartwatch or phone notifications that serve as reminders [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
Smartphone applications, which typically include extra elements to boost engagement (e.g., tracking,
leaderboards, customization, education), have been demonstrated to promote adherence to lifestyle
interventions [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Additionally, there is evidence that the presence of an embodied agent can boost adherence and make
people more obedient [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. Socially supportive robots have been demonstrated in multiple rehabilitation
studies to increase user motivation and engagement [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref13 ref14">12, 13, 14</xref>
        ]. Furthermore, to improve motivation
and task performance during repetitive exercise in healthcare programs, supportive feedback and
ongoing monitoring are crucial [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref15">12, 15</xref>
        ]. Several studies used social assistive robots to interact with
patients in CR programs and monitor their activity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16, 17, 18</xref>
        ]. All these studies reported higher patient
adherence and motivation compared to a non-robot control group. Only one study used social robots for
DBE: CLARA, a physical therapy assistant, was developed with the intention of assisting patients with
arduous and repetitive spirometry exercises [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. However, this study only examined the short-term
advantages (one session) in healthy participants and no clinical trials were carried out.
      </p>
      <p>An additional and often overlooked aspect in improving adherence is through grounding the system
with an appropriate behavioral theory. By looking at DBE as a routine behavior that must be reinforced,
we can draw from the theories of behavior change to support our design. Behavior change is regarded
as an internal process. In other words, a target behavior can not be forced on an individual, resulting in
limited adherence, but they must “want” to change their behavior. Studies have shown that interventions
are more efective when they are grounded in an appropriate theoretical model for behavior change
[19]. These models would help clarify why a person engages in a certain behavior and how we can
influence said behaviors. Some widely used behavioral theories include the Health Belief Model [ 20],
the Theory of Reasoned Action [21], the Social Cognitive Theory [22], the Theory of Planned Behavior
[23], and the Transtheoretical Stage-of-Change Model [24].</p>
      <p>In this preliminary work, we focused on developing a system for increasing adherence to DBE that is
grounded in the Transtheoretical model (TTM) of Behavior change. The system would make use of a
physical robot and a virtual avatar on a mobile app that could serve extra elements to boost engagement.
The aim of this work is to increase adherence to DBE by using a hybrid robot-mobile system grounded
in behavior theory.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Method</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1. Behavioral Model</title>
        <p>Even though the aim of this work is to enhance adherence to DBE, we wanted to design the framework
to be applicable to multiple pathologies. We thus chose to use the TTM as it is the most flexible and can
be applied in a multitude of scenarios. It is much less rigid compared to the other models, in that it can
provide a template to create a behavior change system for any health-related behavior (in theory). It is
lfexible enough that other behavioral theories can even be derived from it.</p>
        <p>The TTM identifies five separate stages that a person goes through in order to change a certain
behavior as outlined by Prochaska and DiClemente [24]. Separate processes and strategies will be more
efective depending on where the person is along these five stages. The stages are as follows:
1. Precontemplation: The state in which an individual may not even be thinking about adopting the
recommended protective behavior, let alone plan to do so.
2. Contemplation: The state in which a person plans to adopt a behavior but has not yet done so.
3. Preparation: The state in which the person consciously decides to change their behavior in the
near future and starts making an efort to do so.
4. Action: The state in which the intended behavior is being consistently carried out but has not
been sustained for more than six months.
5. Maintenance: The state in which the behavior has been consistently carried out for longer than
six months.</p>
        <p>Stage assessment can simply be done by asking the user to rate how ready they feel to adopt the
new behavior. This can be very useful in the beginning, but is better improved by tracking the user’s
progress through monitoring their adherence over time. Our framework for DBE based on the TTM is
shown in Figure 1.</p>
        <p>As this work is aimed to be used with patients who are assigned DBE by a physician, we will always
place patients in the first stage of the TTM. The reason for this is that patients might have felt an
obligation to perform the exercises, in a hospital setting for example, even if they did not want to. In
this case, even though they might have been doing exercises for a few days, this does not reflect their
true readiness to engage in such a behavior.</p>
        <p>Based on their assigned stage, diferent strategies and methods will be used to influence their behavior
and to successfully move them to a successive stage.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2. Preliminary Test</title>
        <p>The overall described system would make use of a NAO robot for physical interactions with the patient
in a clinical setting. The robot would speak to the patients (based on the precontemplation stage of the
TTM) and would guide their exercise performance. When the patient is discharged from the hospital,
they would use a mobile phone app, that would allow the patient to progress through the TTM stages
while having daily conversations with a NAO robot avatar. The app would also provide daily reminders
to perform the exercises, and provide incentives through the tracking of exercise completions.</p>
        <p>For a short-term preliminary test, we developed an Android app with a NAO avatar. The avatar has
an interactive conversation with the user upon opening the app daily. The avatar would answer any
questions relating to DBE that the user might have. Then the app would show a short video giving
instructions on how to properly perform the exercise. The avatar would appear under the video to give
motivational messages to the user as shown in Figure 2. Upon completion of the exercise, the user is
taken to an activity that shows their achievements, including how many exercises they have finished so
far, how many consecutive days they have performed exercises, and how many total days. The user can
press a button at any time to have a conversation with the avatar. The app will also send an alarm to
remind the user to perform the exercises three times per day. The user can snooze the alarm for up to
one hour. The user can also adjust the three alarm times in the settings of the app.</p>
        <p>A NAO robot was used for the first interaction with the participants. The participants had an
interactive conversation with the robot and watched a video to instruct them on how to do the exercises.
They were then asked to install the Android app and to perform the exercises daily for seven days.
The interactive conversation with the robot and the app was created using a mixture of rule-based
responses and an LLM (Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct model).</p>
        <p>Fifteen participants in total were recruited and fully completed the trial. The participants had an
average age of 24 with a standard deviation of 2. As this was a short-term trial with healthy individuals,
personalization using the TTM was not adopted and the efect of DBE on their stress was measured
using an Italian translation of the scale of perceived stress [25]. Finally, the participants’ impressions of
the conversation system were measured using the chatbot usability scale [26].</p>
        <p>Before the start of the experiment, each participant filled out an initial questionnaire for obtaining
demographic information, and the perceived stress scale. In the first phase, carried out in the laboratory,
participants interacted with the NAO robot, which guided them in an initial approach to deep breathing
exercises. After a short presentation, the robot explained how the interaction worked, providing
instructions on how and when to answer its questions and asking for the participant’s name to make
the experience more engaging and immersive. Subsequently, the robot explained the importance and
benefits of deep breathing and guided each participant through a simple practical exercise that lasts
2 minutes, giving precise instructions and motivational support to the participant. At the end of the
session, NAO expressed appreciation for the commitment shown and reiterated the importance of
continuing training in the following seven days via the Android application. In the second phase,
participants continued the experiment from home, using the application daily to perform DBE. Thanks
to the virtual avatar of the NAO robot, the app maintained a motivational approach similar to the one
tested in the laboratory, ensuring continuity and constant support. During the week of use, data were
collected on the frequency of access, time of use, and completion of training sessions, allowing the
level of involvement of the participants to be monitored. At the end of the experimental period, each
participant completed the perceived stress scale to measure any diferences and the chatbot usability
scale.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <p>The usage data from the application showed that the participants all adhered to the daily exercise
regimen, with an average daily usage time between 6 and 12 minutes. The initial results show that
the stress score of the participants was significantly reduced from an average of 21.7 and a standard
deviation of 5.1 before the experiment to an average of 11.5 and a standard deviation of 5.4 after the
seven days of the experiment.</p>
      <p>The analysis of the responses provided by the participants in the questionnaire regarding the system
impressions highlights a high level of satisfaction with the conversational aspect of the system. The
participants had the opportunity to express their opinion through a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where
1 indicates “strongly disagree” and 5 indicates “strongly agree”. The clarity of communication was
particularly appreciated, with a mean of 4.87 and a standard deviation of 0.35, demonstrating that the
instructions provided, both by the robot and the avatar, were perceived as understandable and efective.
The ability to maintain a coherent interaction with respect to the context also received a very positive
evaluation with a mean of 4.53 and a standard deviation of 0.64, while the ease of understanding the
answers and their accuracy reached a mean score of 4.73 and a standard deviation of 0.46. Furthermore,
the waiting time for the answers was considered short and adequate, with an average score of 4.733
(with standard deviation = 0.594). Finally, the perception of how much the robot and the avatar actually
helped the participants achieve their goals was high with an average of 4.600 and a standard deviation
of 0.632.</p>
      <p>The results obtained demonstrate a positive impact on the psychophysical balance of the participants
thanks to the interaction with the NAO robot and the use of the Android application. The reduction
of stress in managing daily life highlights how technological support can facilitate the maintenance
of healthy habits even in the context of a stressful life. The overall experience of the participants,
highlighted by the satisfaction expressed during the initial testing phase, suggests that the interaction
with the robot and the use of the application not only had immediate positive efects but also promoted
confidence in managing daily dificulties and one’s emotions. The clear and motivating communication of
both the avatar and the robot, combined with the ease of use of the application, improved participation
in the suggested training sessions, demonstrating the importance of a user-friendly and engaging
approach. The positive feedback from participants, both for the quality of the interaction with NAO
and for the experience of using the mobile application is confirmed by the average scores, collected
from the final questionnaire, and by the average time of use of the application. This indicates that the
robot and the application were not only perceived as useful but were easily integrated into the daily
routine of the participants. This result is particularly significant for the rehabilitation sector, where
continuity and motivation are essential elements for the success of treatments.</p>
      <p>Therefore, testing has shown that the NAO robot and the mobile application have not only favored
an improvement in the psychophysical well-being of the participants but can also represent a valid
support in therapeutic paths. The results obtained indicate that these technologies can promote stress
management, increase adherence, and support the maintenance of healthy behaviors.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Conclusion</title>
      <p>This short-term preliminary trial was successful in showing the promise of using a physical robot and a
virtual avatar in a mobile application in order to promote adherence to DBE. The participants received
the trial positively and adhered strictly to the regimen resulting in a decrease in their perceived stress
levels. This simplified trial did not include the use of the TTM, which can only be implemented in a
long-term study, in addition to implementing the system with patients who would greatly benefit from
DBE but might be more reluctant to adhere to it due to physical discomforts. In our future work, we
will conduct long-term studies making use of the personalization of the intervention using the TTM
as described in the method section, in addition to comparing the efectiveness of this system with a
system that only utilizes a robot or only a mobile avatar.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This research is supported by the complementary actions to the NRRP “Fit4MedRob - Fit for Medical
Robotics” Grant (# PNC0000007).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>The author(s) have not employed any Generative AI tools.
[17] J. Casas, E. Senft, L. F. Gutierrez, M. Rincon-Rocancio, M. Munera, T. Belpaeme, C. A. Cifuentes,
Social assistive robots: assessing the impact of a training assistant robot in cardiac rehabilitation,
International journal of social robotics 13 (2021) 1189–1203.
[18] N. Céspedes, B. Irfan, E. Senft, C. A. Cifuentes, L. F. Gutierrez, M. Rincon-Roncancio, T. Belpaeme,
M. Múnera, A socially assistive robot for long-term cardiac rehabilitation in the real world,
Frontiers in Neurorobotics 15 (2021) 633248.
[19] T. Ratz, S. Lippke, 8.06 - health behavior change, in: G. J. Asmundson (Ed.), Comprehensive
Clinical Psychology (Second Edition), second edition ed., Elsevier, Oxford, 2022, pp. 95–117.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818697-8.00068-6.
[20] M. H. Becker, The health belief model and personal health behavior, Health education monographs
2 (1974) 324–473.
[21] I. Ajzen, Understanding attitudes and predictiing social behavior, Englewood clifs (1980).
[22] A. Bandura, et al., Social foundations of thought and action, Englewood Clifs, NJ 1986 (1986) 2.
[23] I. Ajzen, From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior, in: Action control: From
cognition to behavior, Springer, 1985, pp. 11–39.
[24] J. O. Prochaska, C. C. DiClemente, Toward a comprehensive model of change, in: Treating
addictive behaviors: Processes of change, Springer, 1986, pp. 3–27.
[25] S. Cohen, T. Kamarck, R. Mermelstein, A global measure of perceived stress, Journal of health and
social behavior (1983) 385–396.
[26] S. Borsci, E. Prati, A. Malizia, M. Schmettow, A. Chamberlain, S. Federici, Ciao ai: the italian
adaptation and validation of the chatbot usability scale, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 27
(2023) 2161–2170.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Westerdahl</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Optimal technique for deep breathing exercises after cardiac surgery</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Minerva Anestesiol</source>
          <volume>81</volume>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <fpage>678</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>683</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Piepoli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
            <surname>Corrà</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Adamopoulos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Benzer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Bjarnason-Wehrens</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Cupples</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Dendale</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Doherty</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Gaita</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Höfer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Secondary prevention in the clinical management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. core components, standards and outcome measures for referral and delivery: a policy statement from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the european association for cardiovascular prevention &amp; rehabilitation. endorsed by the committee for practice guidelines of the european society of cardiology</article-title>
          ,
          <source>European journal of preventive cardiology 21</source>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <fpage>664</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>681</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Højskov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Thygesen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Moons</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Egerod</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Olsen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Berg</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The challenge of non-adherence to early rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass surgery: Secondary results from the sheppheartcabg trial</article-title>
          ,
          <source>European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing</source>
          <volume>19</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>238</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>247</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Bethell</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Turner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Evans</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Rose</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Cardiac rehabilitation in the united kingdom: how complete is the provision?</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention</source>
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
          <fpage>111</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>115</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Sarrafzadegan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Rabiei</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Shirani</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kabir</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Mohammadifard</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Roohafza</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Drop-out predictors in cardiac rehabilitation programmes and the impact of sex diferences among coronary heart disease patients in an iranian sample: a cohort study</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Clinical rehabilitation 21</source>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <fpage>362</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>372</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. U.</given-names>
            <surname>Worcester</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Murphy</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Mee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. B.</given-names>
            <surname>Roberts</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Goble</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Cardiac rehabilitation programmes: predictors of non-attendance and drop-out</article-title>
          ,
          <source>European Journal of Preventive Cardiology</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
          <fpage>328</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>335</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Husak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Krumholz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Kasl</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Mattera</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Roumanis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Vaccarino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Social support as a predictor of participation in cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention</source>
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
          <fpage>19</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>26</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Holmes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hughes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Morrison</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Predicting adherence to medications using health psychology theories: a systematic review of 20 years of empirical research</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Value in Health</source>
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <fpage>863</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>876</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Tavoian</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
            <surname>Craighead</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Deep breathing exercise at work: Potential applications and impact</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Frontiers in Physiology</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>1040091</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>M. C. Carter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Burley</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nykjaer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cade</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Adherence to a smartphone application for weight loss compared to website and paper diary: pilot randomized controlled trial</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of medical Internet research 15</source>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
          <article-title>e32</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Shinozawa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Naya</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Yamato</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Kogure</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Diferences in efect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International journal of human-computer studies 62</source>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
          <fpage>267</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>279</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K. I.</given-names>
            <surname>Kang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Freedman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Mataric</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Cunningham</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Lopez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A hands-of physical therapy assistance robot for cardiac patients</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics</source>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
          <source>ICORR</source>
          <year>2005</year>
          ., IEEE,
          <year>2005</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>337</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>340</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Fasola</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Mataric</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Using socially assistive human-robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Proceedings of the IEEE</source>
          <volume>100</volume>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
          <fpage>2512</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2526</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Swift-Spong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Short</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Wade,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Matarić</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Efects of comparative feedback from a socially assistive robot on self-eficacy in post-stroke rehabilitation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR)</source>
          , IEEE,
          <year>2015</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>764</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>769</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Eriksson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Mataric</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Winstein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Hands-of assistive robotics for post-stroke arm rehabilitation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics</source>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
          <source>ICORR</source>
          <year>2005</year>
          ., IEEE,
          <year>2005</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>21</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>24</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Casas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Irfan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Senft</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Gutiérrez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Rincon-Roncancio</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Munera</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Belpaeme</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Cifuentes</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Social assistive robot for cardiac rehabilitation: A pilot study with patients with angioplasty</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction</source>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>79</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>80</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>