<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>CHeCLOUD-the Cultural Heritage Linked Open Data Cloud</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gabriele Tuozzo</string-name>
          <email>gtuozzo@unisa.it</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maria Angela Pellegrino</string-name>
          <email>mapellegrino@unisa.it</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Antonio Lieto</string-name>
          <email>alieto@unisa.it</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Università degli Studi di Salerno</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>ITALY</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Cultural Heritage (CH) data have become increasingly prominent within the Semantic Web, yet dataset discoverability remains limited due to fragmentation across platforms and a lack of a standard platform to give visibility to published data. This demo paper presents the main features of CHeCLOUD (Cultural Heritage Linked Open Data Cloud): the first domain-specific subcloud of the Linked Open Data Cloud specifically devoted to aggregate and enhance access to Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and ontologies related to CH. CHeCLOUD provides a centralized catalog of 192 curated CH KGs and ontologies and computes a FAIR score for each of them, relying on an automatic and periodic assessment of KGHeartBeat. CHeCLOUD currently ofers RESTful APIs, metadata browsing, and interactive graph visualizations to support FAIR evaluation. Additionally, CHeCLOUD features a semi-automated submission pipeline that engages users and maintainers through GitHub-based workflows. CHeCLOUD aims to foster reuse, interoperability, and findability within the CH community, while ofering a reusable infrastructure to support similar thematic hubs across other domains.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Cultural Heritage</kwd>
        <kwd>Knowledge Graphs</kwd>
        <kwd>Linked Open Data</kwd>
        <kwd>Ontologies</kwd>
        <kwd>Subclouds</kwd>
        <kwd>FAIR principles</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        tion of che), it builds on the successful experience of other domain-specific sub-clouds, such as the
Linguistic LOD Cloud [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] and the Life Sciences LOD Cloud [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ], which have demonstrated the value of
domain-focused aggregation for enhancing findability and interoperability. Beyond simple aggregation,
CHeCLOUD incorporates automated FAIRness evaluations, performed via KGHeartBeat [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], to provide
users with immediate and actionable insights into the quality of the indexed resources.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. CHeCLOUD</title>
      <p>
        CHeCLOUD is a domain-specific subcloud within the LOD ecosystem that indexes linked datasets,
KGs, and ontologies relevant to the CH domain, covering tangible, intangible, and natural heritage in
accordance with UNESCO’s definition [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. Its construction followed a three-phase methodology inspired
by Systematic Literature Reviews, designed to ensure transparency and reproducibility. The process
included: (i) the structured identification of CH datasets from the LOD Cloud 9 and complementary
repositories, (ii) a FAIRness evaluation of the selected datasets using a mapping framework between
data quality dimensions and FAIR principles, operationalized through KGHeartBeat [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], and (iii) a
maintenance strategy involving periodic updates and user feedback mechanisms.
      </p>
      <p>Out of the 1, 658 datasets originally listed in the LOD Cloud snapshot, 147 were initially identified
as potentially relevant to CH. This collection was subsequently refined and expanded to 192 datasets
through expert validation, manual resolution of broken links, and targeted searches in additional
repositories (e.g., DataHub, Zenodo, and institutional portals). With this scale, CHeCLOUD currently
ranks as the third-largest subcloud in the LOD Cloud ecosystem, following the Life Sciences and
Linguistic subclouds.</p>
      <p>
        While Lieto et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] provide a detailed account of the construction methodology and present an
in-depth FAIRness assessment of the datasets, this demonstration paper focuses on showcasing the
practical features and interfaces of CHeCLOUD, illustrating its utility for diferent stakeholders, such
as data providers, curators, and researchers. The platform is publicly accessible at http://isislab.it:
12280/CHe-cloud , ofering a navigable catalog enriched with FAIRness indicators. Its source code is
openly available on GitHub at https://github.com/GabrieleT0/CHe-CLOUD, ensuring transparency and
reproducibility, and it provides programmatic access through RESTful APIs10, enabling integration with
external applications, workflows, and third-party services.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1. Coarse-grain Exploration</title>
        <p>
          CHeCLOUD ofers a coarse-grained exploration interface that provides a high-level overview of the
KGs and ontologies included in the catalog. Implemented as a visual dashboard, it aggregates metadata
and FAIRness assessment results, supporting maintainers in monitoring the overall health and structure
of the cloud. The dashboard displays a variety of statistical insights, such as the number of datasets per
CH subcategory, the availability of SPARQL endpoints and RDF dumps, the most commonly adopted
ontologies, license types, media formats for data dumps, and the availability of access mechanisms (e.g.,
SPARQL endpoints, RDF dumps), enabling analyses similar to those performed on the broader LOD
Cloud [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11">10, 11</xref>
          ]. In addition, a visual synthesis of data quality shows FAIR principles scores via boxplots
and details scores at the dataset level via an interactive tabular representation.
        </p>
        <p>
          Figure 2 shows a snapshot of the dashboard, illustrating that CHeCLOUD is composed predominantly
of datasets, with only 10% being ontologies. Approximately 70% of the datasets relate to tangible
heritage, while natural heritage is the least represented category—an imbalance aligned with trends
observed in related studies [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref13">12, 13</xref>
          ]. FAIR scores range from 1 to 4, with a median above 2.5. Among
the FAIR principles, accessibility shows the most variability, while findability is the most consistently
curated. All principles, except interoperability, tend to reach high scores. This high-level view not
only supports maintainers in identifying trends but also facilitates comparison and benchmarking. For
9LOD Cloud: https://lod-cloud.net
10CHeCLOUD APIs: https://github.com/GabrieleT0/CHe-CLOUD/tree/main/WebApp
example, data providers can compare their datasets against others in the same thematic area to assess
alignment with community standards or improve FAIRness. Likewise, cloud consumers can explore and
compare datasets of potential interest based on topical relevance or specific data needs for their tasks.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2. Fine-grained Exploration</title>
        <p>Resembling the well-known visualization provided by the LOD Cloud, the CHeCLOUD landing page
displays catalogued datasets as an interactive graph. Figure 1 illustrates only the connected component,
while isolated datasets, i.e., those not linked to others, are accessible in the online version. Nodes
are color-coded according to CH subcategories (generic, tangible, intangible, natural), following the
UNESCO classification, and their size reflects the number of incoming links (in-degree). In the online
interface, hovering over a node highlights its connections and displays a tooltip with dataset details,
e.g., its full name and in-degree. Moreover, users can locate specific datasets through a keyword-based
search, as in Figure 4 (1), which matches terms found in the dataset’s name, ID, description, or keywords.</p>
        <p>
          Once a dataset is selected, users are directed to a metadata visualization page that includes both
descriptive metadata and FAIRness metrics, automatically updated on a weekly basis by
KGHeartBeat [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ]. This page provides details such as dataset type (KG or ontology), license, description, access
endpoints, and contact information for the maintainer or author. The FAIRness evaluation is presented,
including (i) the overall FAIR score, (ii) individual scores for each FAIR principle, and (iii) a radar chart
visualizing compliance across sub-principles (as in Figure 4 (2)). Tooltips allow users to view the full
names and exact scores of each sub-principle, while an automatically created explanation of the FAIR
assessment and suggestions for improvement are available on demand (as in Figure 4 (3)). Additionally,
a temporal line chart visualizes the evolution of FAIR scores over time, accompanied by an automatically
generated textual summary created using large language models (LLMs) (Figure 3). Visualizing the
evolution of the FAIR score over time makes it possible to understand how updates to the data or
metadata of the resource afect its overall FAIRness. This functionality is particularly valuable for
dataset producers and maintainers, as it enables them to monitor potential issues introduced during
dataset’s updates.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>2.3. Contribute to the Cloud</title>
        <p>Contributors can support CHeCLOUD (i) by proposing the inclusion of new datasets, or (ii) by suggesting
updates to the metadata of datasets already indexed in the catalog.</p>
        <p>To streamline the integration process, CHeCLOUD employs a semi-automated submission and
validation workflow. New datasets can be submitted through a dedicated metadata form. Upon
submission, a LLM (currently Gemini 2.5 Pro, though interchangeable) automatically evaluates the dataset’s
relevance to the CH domain and assigns it to the appropriate subcategory. This classification is based on
an analysis of the dataset’s title, description, and keywords. A human reviewer subsequently validates
both the metadata and the assigned classification to ensure accuracy. Once approved, the system creates
a new branch and pull request (PR) in the CHeCLOUD GitHub repository, ensuring transparency and
traceability. Contributors can track progress and engage with maintainers via the PR interface. The
only manual step required of maintainers is the approval and merging of the request, after which the
dataset is automatically synchronized and integrated into the catalog. Newly accepted datasets are also
connected via REST APIs to KGHeartBeat, which calculates weekly quality metrics. FAIRness scores for
all datasets, including new ones, are updated accordingly. Note that due to the weekly evaluation cycle,
newly added datasets may appear in CHeCLOUD with their FAIRness scores after up to one week.</p>
        <p>The same workflow applies to metadata updates for indexed datasets where the form is pre-filled
with current metadata, allowing contributors to selectively edit the information, as in Figure 4 (3).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Demonstration and Use Case</title>
      <p>This section illustrates a sample workflow that will be demonstrated during the live session, showcasing
how a user interacts with the CHeCLOUD platform. A recording of the demonstration is also available
at: https://shorturl.at/6o0EZ.</p>
      <p>Imagine the data steward of the Amsterdam Museum preparing a grant proposal to publish or
reuse Linked Data describing their institution and its collection. To strengthen the proposal, the
institution seeks to align with established best practices and reference successful examples in the
domain. CHeCLOUD provides a valuable resource throughout this process:
• Identifying relevant datasets. The steward begins by accessing the CHeCLOUD dashboard
(Figure 2) to explore datasets related to cultural heritage. By consulting the FAIR score table, they can
perform a coarse-grained comparative analysis of datasets based on their overall FAIR score and
individual principle scores. This allows them to discover high-quality datasets in similar domains,
providing concrete references for reuse, alignment, or inspiration.
• Evaluating their own dataset. Returning to the graph-based visualization (Figure 1), the user
searches for Rijksmuseum or a broader keyword such as Netherlands via the search bar
(Figure 4 (1)). Upon selecting the dataset, the detail page (Figure 4 (2)) reveals that it currently has a
low FAIR score, particularly due to a missing score in the Accessibility dimension.
• Identifying gaps and justifying improvements. By using the on-demand textual explanation to
understand the root causes of the dataset’s FAIRness (Figure 4 (3)), and by inspecting the metadata
directly within CHeCLOUD, the steward identifies a key issue: a missing or incorrect SPARQL
endpoint. They propose a correction via the metadata update workflow (Figure 4 (4)). After
approval by a maintainer and subsequent re-evaluation by KGHeartBeat, the updated FAIR score
becomes visible (Figure 4 (5)). This not only improves the dataset’s quality but also provides
evidence of active curation, supported by collaborative contributions. Such transparency can
strengthen the proposal’s impact and help users make informed decisions.</p>
      <p>This scenario demonstrates how CHeCLOUD supports stakeholders in benchmarking, improving,
and promoting Linked Data datasets, ultimately contributing to better data quality and more informed
decision-making within the CH sector.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Conclusion, Limitations and Future directions</title>
      <p>This demo overviews CHeCLOUD, a catalog of CH KGs and ontologies, designed as a thematic subcloud
within the LOD Cloud. It ofers tailored interfaces for producers, consumers, and contributors, enabling
FAIRness monitoring, metadata updates, and cloud exploration via dashboards and graph views. The
infrastructure, available on GitHub, is reusable for creating subclouds in other domains. FAIRness
assessments are automated through integration with KGHeartBeat.</p>
      <p>Limitations and Future Work. At present, no comparative studies have been conducted to
demonstrate superior performance and enhanced usability of this cloud in relation to other similar resource
aggregators, such as the LOD Cloud. Furthermore, the entire process of FAIRness assessment currently
relies exclusively on KGHeartBeat, and no comparison has been carried out with alternative tools that
enable the evaluation of resource FAIRness.</p>
      <p>Dataset discovery is currently semi-automated, relying on LLMs and metadata, currently limiting the
platform’s scalability and its long-term sustainability. Future plans include content-based classification,
advanced search with adjustable FAIR weights, and improved explainability with corrective suggestions.</p>
      <p>The newly indexed datasets and their updated metadata are not yet reflected in the LOD Cloud.
However, this integration can be readily achieved, as CHeCLOUD supports the export of the entire
catalog as a JSON file that adheres to the same structure as the original LOD Cloud, thereby facilitating
seamless future incorporation.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This work was partially supported by the European Alliance NEOLAiA (Project 101124794: “NEOLAiA
– Transforming Regions for an Inclusive Europe").</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>During the preparation of this work, the author used ChatGPT in order to: Grammar and spelling check.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Wilkinson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Dumontier</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Aalbersberg</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Appleton,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Axton</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Baak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Blomberg</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.-W.</given-names>
            <surname>Boiten</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. B. da Silva</given-names>
            <surname>Santos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Bourne</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Scientific data 3</source>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>9</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1038/sdata.
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <volume>18</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Amdouni</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Bouazzouni</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Jonquet</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>O'</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>FAIRe: Ontology fairness evaluator in the agroportal semantic resource repository</article-title>
          , in: P.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Groth</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rula</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schneider</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tiddi</surname>
            , E. Simperl,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alexopoulos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hoekstra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alam</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dimou</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M. Tamper (Eds.),
          <source>The Semantic Web: ESWC 2022 Satellite Events</source>
          , Springer International Publishing, Cham,
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>89</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>94</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>031</fpage>
          -11609-4_
          <fpage>17</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Garijo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Corcho</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Poveda-Villalón, FOOPS!: An ontology pitfall scanner for the FAIR principles 2980 (</article-title>
          <year>2021</year>
          ). URL: http://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-
          <volume>2980</volume>
          /paper321.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Gaignard</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Rosnet</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>De Lamotte</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Lefort</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.-D. Devignes</surname>
          </string-name>
          , FAIR-Checker:
          <article-title>supporting digital resource findability and reuse with knowledge graphs and semantic web standards</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Biomedical Semantics</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <article-title>7</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1186/s13326-023-00289-5.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Lieto</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Pellegrino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>G.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Tuozzo, The FAIRness of CHeCLOUD, the Cultural Heritege Linked Open Data Cloud, Semantic web (</article-title>
          <year>2025</year>
          ). URL: https://www.semantic
          <article-title>-web-journal.net/content/ fairness-checloud-cultural-heritage-linked-open-data-cloud.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Chiarcos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Hellmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Nordhof</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Linking Linguistic Resources: Examples from the Open Linguistics Working Group,
          <year>2012</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>201</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>216</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>642</fpage>
          -28249-2_
          <fpage>19</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hasnain</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. Sana E</given-names>
            <surname>Zainab</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kamdar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Mehmood</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Warren</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Jr,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Fatimah</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Deus</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Mehdi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Decker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A roadmap for navigating the life sciences linked open data cloud</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>319</fpage>
          -15615-
          <issue>6</issue>
          _
          <fpage>8</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Pellegrino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Rula</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Tuozzo,
          <article-title>KGHeartBeat: An Open Source Tool for Periodically Evaluating the Quality of Knowledge Graphs</article-title>
          , in: International Semantic Web Conference, Springer,
          <year>2024</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>40</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>58</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>031</fpage>
          -77847-
          <issue>6</issue>
          _
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>UNESCO</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Cultural</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>heritage</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2009</year>
          . URL: https://uis.unesco.org/en/glossary-term/cultural-heritage,
          <source>[Online, Last access April</source>
          <year>2025</year>
          ].
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Debattista</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Lange</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Auer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Cortis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Evaluating the quality of the LOD cloud: An empirical investigation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Semantic Web</source>
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <fpage>859</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>901</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3233/SW-180306.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Gabriele</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Navigating the LOD Subclouds: Assessing Linked Open Data Quality by Domain</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference</source>
          , Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA,
          <year>2025</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1145/3701716.3717569.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Monaco</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Pellegrino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Scarano</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L. Vicidomini,
          <article-title>Linked open data in authoring virtual exhibitions</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Cultural Heritage</source>
          <volume>53</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>127</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>142</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.culher.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>11</volume>
          . 002.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Pellegrino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Scarano</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Spagnuolo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Move cultural heritage knowledge graphs in everyone's pocket</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Semantic Web</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>323</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>359</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3233/SW-223117.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>