<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Software: Evolution and Process 31 (2019).
[24] C. Calero</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1613-0073</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/ICT4S58814.2023.00025</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Artificial Intelligence for the Design, Sustainability, and Improvement of Collaborative Processes</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Martín Rubio</string-name>
          <email>mrubio@fing.edu.uy</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Workshop</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Instituto de Computación, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de la República</institution>
          ,
          <country country="UY">Uruguay</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <fpage>20</fpage>
      <lpage>24</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>In recent decades, Process Mining has played a key role in improving organizational processes. Today's growing organizational complexity, with collaborative processes involving multiple actors and interactions, demands new perspectives for Business Process (BP) design, analysis, and improvement. At the same time, there is increasing interest in reducing the environmental impact of human activities, in which processes are naturally involved. BPs sustainability evaluation is key for organizations to be able to improve their operations and minimize its impact. Artificial intelligence (AI) have gained relevance in all areas including process mining, to help and enhanced BPs evaluation and analysis, taking advantage of the large amounts of available process execution data. This doctoral work main objective is to expand the scope of process mining and AI by integrating techniques, practices, and tools for the design, sustainability and improvement of collaborative processes. The aim of this work is to reduce modeling efort, improve the execution and sustainability of collaborative processes, and reduce the gap between models and their actual execution. Validation of results will focus on controlled experiments and experts surveys, as well as case studies in a real context. The proposal will contribute to the field of PM for collaborative processes and sustainability analysis, helping organizations towards evidence-based BPs improvement.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Process mining</kwd>
        <kwd>collaborative processes</kwd>
        <kwd>sustainability</kwd>
        <kwd>artificial intelligence</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Over the past decades, process mining [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] has emerged as a discipline that helps organizations analyze
their business processes (BPs). These processes reflect increasingly complex technological ecosystems,
while organizations show a growing interest in reducing the environmental impact of human activities
in which they are embedded. Sustainability [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] is the use of resources without compromising future
generations, balancing economic growth, social well-being, and environmental protection. Assessing
and improving process sustainability requires measuring their execution through sustainability-related
data and measures. This motivates the inclusion of a sustainability dimension in BPs analysis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], within
the devil’s quadrangle of time, cost, quality and flexibility [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Within collaborative processes [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], that deals with dependencies and interactions among multiple
participants within a single overarching process, process design for sustainability and its assessment
and improvement have to deal with elements such as data privacy, heterogeneous technologies and data
registration. This distributed nature, embedded in diverse technical contexts, presents several challenges
for data collection, preparation, discovery and analysis of collaborative processes [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], including the
sustainability dimension. In particular, traditional XES event logs and object-centric event logs must
deal with data concerning diferent participants and messages exchanged.
      </p>
      <p>
        In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has permeated all areas, including process mining, enabling
the integration of new approaches for design, automation, and data analysis, such as machine learning
(ML) for predicting future events based on historical event logs, or content generation using large
language models (LLMs), trained on vast amounts of data, to assist with diverse tasks such as process
modeling or execution trace analysis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7 ref8 ref9">7, 8, 9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>CEUR</p>
      <p>ceur-ws.org</p>
      <p>In this context, this doctoral thesis seeks to extend process mining with artificial intelligence and
a sustainability focus, integrating new techniques, practices, methodologies, and tools to design and
improve collaborative processes.The integration of diferent AI techniques, such as process data
generation and analysis of traces through generative models, pattern recognition, or agent-based modelling
supported by large language models (LLMs) will enhance process mining techniques providing new
alternatives and results for sustainability analysis and process design and improvement. This work
aims to ease modeling, enhance execution and sustainability in collaborative processes, and narrow the
gap between models and execution.</p>
      <p>The remainder of this document is organized as follows: Section 2 presents the motivation and
research questions. Section 3 reviews related work. Section 4 describes the methodology, and Section 5
outlines the proposal. Finally, Section 6 presents the conclusions.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Motivation and Research questions</title>
      <p>Process mining provides analytical tools that can be adapted to the proposed context, even in
collaborative processes, and within traditional event logs or object-centric event logs. Few proposals address
the automation and improvement of BPs with a sustainability focus; a key enabler is collecting and
integrating sustainability data into their execution for further analysis and tool support.</p>
      <p>
        Also, the current state of several artificial intelligence applications ofers a new set of readily available
methods and tools, such as ML, LLMs and Agentic-based approaches (c.f. Section 3, which the integration
within process mining techniques and perspectives we aim to asses and provide within the approach.
Based on the previous statements, the research question is defined as follows: How can process mining
be extended with artificial intelligence methods to capture, analyze, and improve sustainability aspects
in collaborative processes?. From the general research question, specific research questions are defined:
• RQ1. What process mining-based techniques, practices, methodologies and tools could be useful
for the design, sustainability analysis and improvement of collaborative business processes?
• RQ2. What process mining approaches exists to deal with business process sustainability and
which artificial intelligence methods are integrated, in particular for collaborative processes, and
what limitations they present?. The answer to this research question, which will be obtained by a
systematic literature review [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11">10, 11</xref>
        ], provides the state of the art for the thesis work.
• RQ3. How can artificial intelligence methods be integrated within process mining techniques to
enhance the design, sustainability, and improvement of collaborative processes?
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Related work</title>
      <p>
        The application of process mining techniques (discovery, conformance, enhancement, prediction) on
business process execution data [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] has primarily focused on orchestration-type processes carried
out within a single organization (intra-organizational) and, more recently, on collaborative
(interorganizational) processes [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref13 ref14 ref15 ref16 ref6">12, 13, 14, 6, 15, 16</xref>
        ], mainly in the area of process discovery. The
ObjectCentric Event Data (OCED) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ] event log, has been introduced as the successor to the traditional XES
standard (IEEE 1849-2016) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ] for process log representation, particularly from an object-oriented
perspective. This object-oriented log expands the analytical capabilities for process analysis, especially
in collaborative processes.
      </p>
      <p>
        On the other hand, sustainability-oriented processes and approaches such as Green BPM have gained
relevance. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], a review shows that the main focus has been on measuring and controlling emissions
or energy consumption in business processes, primarily addressing the environmental dimension. There
are limited approaches that explicitly address specific sustainability measures in business processes
[19, 20], particularly those amenable to analysis through process mining [21, 22].
      </p>
      <p>The evaluation of ICTs in [23] aims to manage energy resources eficiently while controlling the impact
of the performed activities, and [24] analyzes how supporting software, such as BPMS platforms, artificial
intelligence algorithms [25], and process discovery techniques [26], influences energy consumption.
The notion of “Green Data Science” (GDS) was introduced in [27] due to the potential “pollution” that
data science itself can cause.</p>
      <p>
        Advances in artificial intelligence have enabled the integration of new automation and data analysis
approaches, such as machine learning (ML) for predicting future events [28, 29], or the creation of new
content through large language models (LLMs) to assist in various tasks. In particular, LLMs have been
used to generate textual descriptions from process data and event logs, to derive process models from
textual descriptions, and to leverage textual descriptions of models and event logs for process mining
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7 ref8">7, 8, 30</xref>
        ], as well as to assess requirements for the use of LLMs and related tools [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Metodology</title>
      <p>
        To guide the research, the principles of Design Science are followed, [31, 32, 33]. focusing on the creation
of artifacts such as: a framework and working methodology, diferent models (processes, ML, LLMs, and
prompt engineering), and algorithms for process mining, data recording and management, sustainability
measures, among others. Following this methodology, the research started with the problem definition
to identify hypotheses and research questions, followed with a state-of-the-art review on the selected
topics, based on the guidelines for systematic literature reviews and mapping studies proposed in
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11">10, 11</xref>
        ]. The search protocol was defined focusing on process mining and sustainability first, and then
process mining and AI, to find proposals covering the main topics of the work, that could be taken into
account for collaborative processes. The proposal is then defined based on the creation of artifacts to
solve the problem identified, which will be validated using diferent approaches (c.f. Subsection 4.1),
and with publications in leading regional and international conferences and journals.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.1. Validation of results</title>
        <p>For the validation of the diferent results, the guidelines in [ 31, 34] will be followed, considering both
the technical validation and the empirical validation of the proposed artifacts. For instance, controlled
experiments and surveys will be carried out to validate the adequacy of the proposed solutions with
domain experts (e.g., sustainability measures and analysis), to gather their opinions on the usefulness,
applicability, and suitability of the proposals in real-world contexts, and with functional prototypes.
Furthermore, case studies [34, 35] are planned within the context of real collaborative e-Government
processes (AGESIC)1, which will allow assessing applicability as well as identifying opportunities for
improvement and limitations.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Proposal</title>
      <p>The proposal integrates sustainability into the entire process life cycle, from design and implementation
to execution, analysis, and improvement. The focus is on collaborative business processes supported by
information systems, particularly BPMS, though it can also extend to other domains. Figure 1 provides
an overview, illustrating a BPMS for BPs execution as example.</p>
      <p>A key component is a systematic approach for registering sustainability-related data during process
execution (i.e. parameters and measures values), drawing, for instance, on the measures described
in [23, 19] with corresponding calculation formulae. Conceptual components and tools support this
registration by capturing parameter values at execution time. They also distinguish between estimated
and measured data, helping users interpret the resulting values appropriately. From process execution,
event logs are generated, containing sustainability-related data registered directly during execution
i.e. parameters values (and optionally also measures calculated values), as well as adding measures
calculation after a log enrichment process, using as basis the registered data i.e. parameters values.
1https://www.gub.uy/agencia-gobierno-electronico-sociedad-informacion-conocimiento/
These options are described in subsection 5.1, and applies for traditional XES and object-centric event
logs.</p>
      <p>
        With the sustainability extended event logs, process mining is performed using traditional approaches,
complemented by the new possibilities ofered by artificial intelligence tools such as Large Language
Models (LLMs) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7 ref8 ref9">7, 8, 9</xref>
        ] and machine learning in general. The integration of agentics, specific prompt
engineering techniques and tools to interact with LLMs such as [36], to provide users with extended
support for the analsys of BPs execution with focus on sustainability. A dedicated sustainability
dashboard is provided, which presents sustainability measures data and process mining results, and
will integrate AI modules, to help users identifying evidence-based improvement opportunities, with
sustainability patterns and process improvements guided recommendations.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>5.1. Registration of sustainability data</title>
        <p>Existing approaches that incorporate sustainability attributes into business processes do not clearly
specify how such data can be systematically registered and derived. To fill this gap, this work proposes a
systematic approach that integrates concrete sustainability measures based on [23, 19], whose values are
either registered directly during execution or calculated in a post-processing stage using sustainability
parameters registered during runtime. The focus is on the enviromental dimension, including categories
such as energy, emission, material, water, waste and software. We extended them by adding the concrete
formulae and parameters needed for calculation, and adding measures related to BPs execution in an
information system, such as the language of implementation e.g. Java, Python, etc, the CPU, cloud,
among others, which can be estimated based on existing reference data, such as CO2 emissions.</p>
        <p>The proposal includes a method to register and calculate sustainability measures, an extension to
the XES format to include sustainability data (and translation to object-centric event logs), specific
sustainability measures and a measurement taxonomy that distinguish between estimated and actually
measured values (e.g. with a phisical devise such as sensors) diferentiating approaches by their degree
of empiricism, to help users in interpreting the results. Tool support is also provided for sustainibility
data registration and microservices-based sustainability measures calculator.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>5.2. AI support for process mining tasks</title>
        <p>Various artificial intelligence tools can be applied to process mining, as has traditionally been done with
machine learning, and more recent studies are focusing on LLMs. Evidence, such as that presented in
[37], shows satisfactory performance in a range of process mining tasks using large-scale commercial
LLMs. However, it is worth noting that the environmental impact of LLMs can be considerable when
deployed at a global scale [38]. For this reason, alternative approaches will be explored that leverage
the capabilities of the technology available for process mining while, from a sustainability perspective,
ensuring that the tools themselves do not become part of the problem. Through the concept of agents,
multiple specialized process mining tools can be orchestrated in a coordinated manner across diferent
stages of the process mining lifecycle to enhance their tasks. For example, the integration with Model
Context Protocol (MCP) [39] servers to allow specific context for LLMs use will be evaluated.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-3">
        <title>5.3. Object-centric events logs</title>
        <p>The integration of data associated with processes and organizational information, particularly
sustainability-related data, is key in the context of the proposed work. In previous work the
integration of organizational data into process logs [40] was addressed, defining methodologies and tools
that enable a joint process and organizational data analysis. This will be translated also into OCED
event logs and analsys, leveraging the metamodel and implementation described in [41], with focus on
collaborative processes and associated challenges e.g. data privacy and security across organizations,
common goals for sustainability, heterogeneous infrastructure, among others. On the other hand, since
OCED is still a relatively recent standard, there are few process logs available to support research tasks.
In this regard, several strategies are being analyzed to generate synthetic event logs based on OCED
such as Conditional Tabular GANs (CTGANs) [42]. Preliminary results indicate that it is possible to
generate high-quality synthetic logs using these technologies, which will serve as a valuable input for
experimentation with diferent datasets.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-4">
        <title>5.4. BPs improvement recommendations</title>
        <p>
          Based on the process mining with IA support analysis, integrating sustainability data and measures,
improvement recommendations will be derived to help organizations improve their processes, with focus
on collaborative scenarios. By adding the sustainability dimension to the Devil’s Quadrangle similarly
to [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ], sustainability patterns and re-design heuristics will be proposed, that will help organizations to
reshape their BPs and/or their organizational/technical support, to provide better results in terms of the
BPs objectives, but with less environmental impact.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Conclusions</title>
      <p>This work addresses the challenges inherent in improving collaborative processes by incorporating an
environmental sustainability perspective through process mining, supported by advances in artificial
intelligence. These challenges are addressed through the definition of several artifacts which will be
validated from diferent perspectives with controlled experiments and surveys, and real-world cases of
collaborative processes within the Uruguayan government, employing data provided by AGESIC.</p>
      <p>Suitable techniques, practices, methodologies, improvement recommendations and supporting tools
will be integrated and defined for the design and redesign of sustainable processes, taking into account
and extending/adapting existing proposals, as well as defining new ones to achieve the stated
objectives. The results of this work will be of help to organizations in order to analyze and improve their
collaborative BPs with a sustainability focus, minimizing their environmental impact.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>7. Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>Partially supported by projects: “Minería de procesos con automatización robótica e IA generativa para
el diseño y sostenibilidad de procesos colaborativos hiperconectados” funded by Comisión Sectorial
de Investigación Científica (CSIC), Universidad de la República, Proy I+D 2024, “22520240100504UD”,
Uruguay and Academic Graduate program PEDECIBA Informática, Ministry of Education and Culture
(MEC) and UdelaR, Uruguay.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>8. Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>During the preparation of this work, the author used Chat-GPT-5 in order to: Text Translation and
Grammar and spelling check. After using these tool, the author reviewed and edited the content as
needed and take full responsibility for the publication’s content.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>W. van der Aalst</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Process Mining: Data Science in Action, 2nd.ed., Springer,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Brundtland</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Report of the world commision on enviroment and development: our common future</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: United Nations</source>
          ,
          <year>1987</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Couckuyt</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Looy</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A systematic review of green business process management</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Business Process Management Journal</source>
          <volume>26</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>421</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>446</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Reijers</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Heuristic Workflow Redesign, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,
          <year>2003</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>207</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>243</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/3- 540- 36615-
          <issue>6</issue>
          _
          <fpage>6</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>W. M. P. van der Aalst</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Intra- and inter-organizational process mining: Discovering processes within and between organizations</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: The Practice of Enterprise Modeling</source>
          , Springer, Cham,
          <year>2011</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>11</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978- 3-
          <fpage>642</fpage>
          - 24849-
          <issue>8</issue>
          _
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Peña</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Andrade</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Delgado</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Calegari</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Inter-organizational collaborative bpmn 2.0 business process discovery</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Intelligent Information Systems</source>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Grohs</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Abb</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Elsayed</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.-R.</given-names>
            <surname>Rehse</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Large language models can accomplish business process management tasks</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Business Process Management Workshops</source>
          , Springer,
          <year>2024</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>453</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>465</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Kourani</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Berti</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Hennrich</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Kratsch</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Weidlich</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.-Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Arslan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Schuster</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>W. M. P. van der Aalst</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Leveraging large language models for enhanced process model comprehension</article-title>
          ,
          <source>CoRR abs/2408</source>
          .08892 (
          <year>2024</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Berti</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Kourani</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Häfke</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.-Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Schuster</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Evaluating large language models in process mining: Capabilities, benchmarks, and evaluation strategies, in: Enterprise, Business-Process and Inf</article-title>
          .Sys. Modeling, Springer,
          <year>2024</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>21</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Kitchenham</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Technical Report TR/SE-0401</source>
          , Keele University and Empirical Soft.
          <source>Eng. Joint Report</source>
          , Keele, UK,
          <year>2004</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kitchenham</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Charters</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Technical Report EBSE</source>
          <year>2007</year>
          -
          <volume>001</volume>
          , Keele University and Durham University Joint Report, Keele, UK,
          <year>2007</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Zeng</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Lu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Cross-organization emergency response process mining: An approach based on petri nets</article-title>
          , Math. Problems in Eng. (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>12</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1155/
          <year>2020</year>
          /8836007.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L. Cheng, Q. Zeng,
          <article-title>Cross-department collaborative healthcare process model discovery from event logs</article-title>
          ,
          <source>IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering</source>
          <volume>20</volume>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>2115</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2125</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/TASE.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>3194312</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Hernandez</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Tello,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Marin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>U. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Ramirez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Mata</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Merging event logs for interorganizational process mining</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: New Perspectives on Enterprise Decision-Making Applying AI Techniques</source>
          , Springer,
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>26</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978- 3-
          <fpage>030</fpage>
          - 71115-
          <issue>3</issue>
          _
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Corradini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Pettinari</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Re</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Rossi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Tiezzi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A technique for discovering bpmn collaboration diagrams</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Software and System Modeling</source>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <fpage>1323</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1343</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s10270- 024- 01153- 5.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.-V.</given-names>
            <surname>Benzin</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S. Rinderle-Ma,
          <article-title>Collaboration miner: Discovering collaboration petri nets</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Cooperative Information Systems</source>
          , Springer,
          <year>2025</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>373</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>381</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978- 3-
          <fpage>031</fpage>
          - 81375- 7_
          <fpage>24</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Fahland</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Montali</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Lebherz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>W. M. P. van der Aalst</surname>
            , M. van Asseldonk,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Blank</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bosmans</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brenscheidt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ciccio</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Delgado</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Calegari</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Peeperkorn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Verbeek</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vugs</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wynn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Towards a simple and extensible standard for object-centric event data (OCED) - core model, design space, and lessons learned</article-title>
          ,
          <source>CoRR abs/2410</source>
          .14495 (
          <year>2024</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X. W.</given-names>
            <surname>Group</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Ieee standard for extensible event stream (xes) for achieving interoperability in event logs and event streams</article-title>
          ,
          <source>IEEE Std</source>
          <year>1849</year>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>50</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>