<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Actual Weight of Lightweight Description Logics</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano</institution>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>for Invited Talk</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Since the mid-2000s, when the theoretical foundations of lightweight description logics (DLs) were
established, the EL and DL-Lite families have become central to both foundational and applied research
in the field. DL-Lite was designed aiming at FO-rewritability of ontology-mediated query answering,
ensuring the same data complexity as plain query evaluation and enabling eficient query processing
over large data sources. EL, on the other hand, supports consequence-based reasoning with
polynomialtime complexity, a feature that has proven essential for handling large-scale ontologies such as SNOMED
CT. Both families have triggered extensive investigations of the trade-of between expressive power
and complexity of inference across a wide range of reasoning tasks beyond satisfiability and query
answering, profoundly shaping the DL research landscape over the past two decades. Their impact
extends far beyond theory: EL and DL-Lite underpin the EL and QL Profiles of OWL 2, respectively,
and form the backbone of biomedical reasoning as well as ontology-based data access and integration
in a variety of application domains. In this talk, we revisit the theoretical foundations of these logics,
examine their role in defining the tractable fragments of DLs, and discuss how their principles continue
to drive research in both theory and practice.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>