<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>FlowInTeam at SatiSPeech-IberLEF 2025: Multimodal Speech-text Satire Recognition in Spanish</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nguyen Minh Bao</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Trinh Tran Tran</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nguyen Thien Bao</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dang Van Thin</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Information Technology-VNUHCM</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Quarter 6, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="VN">Vietnam</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Vietnam National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ho Chi Minh City</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="VN">Vietnam</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper presents our submission to the SatiSPeech 2025 shared task at IberLEF, which focuses on satire detection using unimodal (text-only) and multimodal (text + audio) approaches. For the text classification task, we used TF-IDF features, BETO embeddings, and shallow models such as Logistic Regression, SVM, and XGBoost. In the multimodal setting, audio features extracted via MFCCs were processed by a CNN and fused with text features (TF-IDF + SVD and BETO) before being passed to classifiers including MLP and other shallow models. A key aspect of our system was the independent fine-tuning of the CNN, allowing it to act as a specialized expert on audio data within the final ensemble. We applied a voting ensemble to combine model predictions. Our system ranked 4th in the oficial evaluation phase and improved to 2nd place in the post-evaluation phase, highlighting the efectiveness of combining shallow and deep learning techniques, multimodal fusion, and targeted CNN optimization for satire detection in Spanish.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Satire detection</kwd>
        <kwd>Multimodal learning</kwd>
        <kwd>Spanish language</kwd>
        <kwd>Text classification</kwd>
        <kwd>Audio classification</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        SatiSPeech at IberLEF 2025 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] is a shared task that aims to advance the automatic detection of
satire through multimodal natural language processing (NLP) techniques. Satire is a complex and
subtle communicative form that intertwines humor, irony, and social commentary, often relying on
context-dependent cues such as tone, prosody, exaggeration, and cultural references [3, 4]. Unlike
explicit sentiment expressions, satire typically conveys meaning indirectly, which poses considerable
challenges for both human annotators and machine learning systems. This shared task provides a
unique opportunity for the research community to explore the boundaries of satire recognition using
both text and audio modalities.
      </p>
      <p>The SatiSPeech 2025 competition consists of two subtasks. Task 1: Text Satire Detection focuses
on classifying Spanish-language text segments as either satirical or non-satirical. This task requires
models to identify linguistic patterns indicative of satire, such as wordplay, sarcasm, or implicit social
critique [5, 6]. Task 2: Multimodal Satire Detection expands this challenge by incorporating audio data,
enabling participants to exploit speech characteristics such as intonation, rhythm, and vocal emphasis
in combination with textual content. This multimodal approach is particularly relevant, as satire often
manifests through the interplay of spoken delivery and written language [7, 8].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Methodology</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1. Preprocessing data</title>
        <p>For data preprocessing, we adopted distinct strategies for the text and audio modalities to best preserve
the features relevant to satire detection.</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-1">
          <title>2.1.1. Text Preprocessing</title>
          <p>For the textual data, we applied tokenization to segment each utterance into linguistically meaningful
units, ensuring that important elements such as punctuation and word boundaries-often crucial for
conveying irony or sarcasm-were retained. Following tokenization, we standardized the resulting
feature vectors using a standard scaler. This normalization step was intended to enhance the stability
and convergence of downstream machine learning models by ensuring that all features contributed
equally during training.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-2">
          <title>2.1.2. Audio Preprocessing</title>
          <p>In contrast, for the audio modality, we opted to use the original, unscaled audio features as input to our
models. Satirical speech often relies on subtle prosodic and acoustic cues-such as intonation, rhythm,
and emphasis-that can be diminished or lost through aggressive normalization or scaling. By preserving
the raw audio features, we aimed to maintain the richness of these cues, allowing our models to fully
exploit the nuanced characteristics of satirical speech. This approach ensured that both textual and
acoustic information were optimally prepared for the subsequent classification tasks.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2. Task 1 - Text Satire Detection</title>
        <p>We explored two vectorization strategies: TF-IDF, which captures surface-level lexical patterns and
serves as a strong baseline for linear models, and BETO, a pre-trained Spanish BERT model, which
encodes deep contextualized features. These embeddings were then fed into diferent classifiers to study
both linear and non-linear decision boundaries.</p>
        <p>To improve performance and robustness, we experimented with multiple model combinations,
optimized their hyperparameters using Optuna[9], and finally applied a simple ensemble strategy
to aggregate predictions from the best-performing models.</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-2-1">
          <title>2.2.1. Vector Encoding Text</title>
          <p>We used two diferent strategies to convert input text into numerical representations:
• TF-IDF (Term Frequency–Inverse Document Frequency): This classical vectorization method
assigns a weight to each word based on its frequency across documents. It helps capture
surfacelevel lexical cues that may be indicative of satire (e.g., rare or exaggerated word usage). The
TF-IDF vectors were used with simple linear classifiers to test the generalizability of shallow
features in satire detection.
• BETO Embeddings: We used the Spanish pre-trained BETO [10] model to extract contextualized
embeddings from the input text. Specifically, the token representation from the final hidden
layer was used as a fixed-size sentence vector. These embeddings aim to capture deeper semantic
patterns and contextual dependencies typical of satirical language.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-2-2">
          <title>2.2.2. Classification Model</title>
          <p>We employed three classification configurations:
• TF-IDF + Logistic Regression: This setup serves as a strong and interpretable baseline to
evaluate whether surface-level lexical cues are suficient for satire classification. By applying
logistic regression to TF-IDF features, the model learns a linear decision boundary based on word
frequency patterns. While this approach lacks semantic understanding, it ofers insight into
how much information can be captured from basic lexical statistics alone. It is also
computationally eficient and robust to small training data, making it suitable for initial prototyping and
benchmarking.
• BETO + Logistic Regression: This configuration combines the power of contextualized word
embeddings with a simple linear classifier. BETO model—a BERT variant pre-trained on a large
Spanish corpus—we aim to capture deeper semantic and syntactic features inherent in satirical
expressions. Logistic regression on top of BETO embeddings helps to test whether these learned
representations are linearly separable and whether a simple classifier can exploit the richness of
deep contextual cues without introducing model complexity.
• BETO + XGBoost: This configuration is designed to model the non-linear and complex
relationships embedded within the high-dimensional BETO features. Unlike logistic regression, which
assumes a linear boundary, XGBoost leverages an ensemble of decision trees to capture intricate
patterns and interactions that are often present in satirical language—such as implicit irony,
multi-level semantic cues, and context-dependent humor. The use of XGBoost enables the model
to adapt to subtle and non-obvious characteristics that are critical for efective satire detection,
particularly in cases where linear models may underperform due to oversimplified assumptions.</p>
          <p>As such, this setup serves as the most expressive model in our pipeline.</p>
          <p>Hyperparameters for each model were optimized using Optuna, a hyperparameter tuning framework
based on Bayesian optimization. Each configuration was trained and validated independently.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-2-3">
          <title>2.2.3. Ensemble model</title>
          <p>Finally, we applied a soft voting ensemble at figure 1 to combine the predictions of the three models.
Specifically, we assigned a weight of 0.2 to the TF-IDF + Logistic Regression model and a weight of 0.4 to
each of the two BETO-based models: BETO + Logistic Regression and BETO + XGBoost. This weighted
strategy allows the ensemble to place greater emphasis on the deep contextual features learned by
BETO, while still retaining the complementary lexical cues captured by TF-IDF. The ensemble improved
performance and robustness on the validation set by leveraging the strengths of both shallow and deep
representations, as well as combining linear and non-linear decision boundaries.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>2.3. Task 2 - Multimodal Satire Detection</title>
        <p>For Task 2, we follow a multimodal pipeline at figure 2 that processes audio and text in parallel. Audio
features are extracted and embedded through a CNN-based module, while textual features are obtained
via embedding techniques. The resulting representations are concatenated into a joint feature vector and
passed through a multimodal classification block. Final predictions are produced using a Hard-voting
ensemble to enhance overall performance.</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-1">
          <title>2.3.1. Vector Encoding Text</title>
          <p>For textual representation, we employed two encoding strategies to transform the input into fixed-size
vectors suitable for multimodal integration:
• TF-IDF + SVD: This method uses Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) to
capture the importance of words across the corpus. As TF-IDF typically yields high-dimensional
sparse vectors, we apply Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to reduce the dimensionality to
300. This step not only improves computational eficiency but also ensures compatibility with
downstream neural components such as the MLP, which perform better with dense, fixed-length
inputs.
• BETO Embeddings: We utilize BETO, a BERT-based pretrained language model for Spanish.</p>
          <p>Sentence-level embeddings are obtained by mean pooling over token representations from the
ifnal hidden layer, resulting in 768-dimensional dense vectors that encode rich contextual and
semantic information.</p>
          <p>These vector representations are later concatenated with the audio embeddings in the multimodal
pipeline for final classification.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-2">
          <title>2.3.2. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to extract features from Mel Frequency Cepstral</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-3">
          <title>Coeficients (MFCCs)</title>
          <p>To capture relevant acoustic cues for satire detection, we employed a Convolutional Neural Network
(CNN) architecture at figure 3 to process Mel Frequency Cepstral Coeficients (MFCCs), a widely
adopted representation of speech signals. MFCCs ofer a perceptually grounded, compact encoding of
the short-term spectral envelope of audio, efectively capturing timbral and prosodic nuances that are
potentially informative for detecting satirical tone.</p>
          <p>Our CNN architecture is designed to extract robust feature representations from the MFCC matrices,
treating them as 2D inputs over time and frequency. The network consists of two convolutional blocks,
each composed of a 2D convolutional layer followed by batch normalization and ReLU activation. The
ifrst block uses 16 filters while the second uses 32, allowing the model to progressively learn more
abstract and complex patterns in the spectro-temporal domain. These blocks are followed by an adaptive
average pooling layer, which reduces the spatial dimensions to a fixed-size 4 ×4 output, regardless of the
input length — a crucial design choice to accommodate variable-length utterances during inference.</p>
          <p>The pooled feature maps are then flattened and passed through a fully connected (linear) layer with
64 hidden units, acting as a feature bottleneck. Finally, a classification head maps the 64-dimensional
representation to a two-class output (satire vs. non-satire). This design efectively balances model
complexity and computational eficiency, enabling the system to learn discriminative audio features
without overfitting.</p>
          <p>By learning directly from low-level MFCC inputs, the CNN is capable of capturing non-trivial acoustic
cues — such as exaggerated prosody, irregular rhythm, or tonal patterns — that may signal satirical
intent. These audio-based features were later integrated with text-based features in our multimodal
system to further enhance satire detection performance.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-4">
          <title>2.3.3. Classification Model</title>
          <p>The final multimodal feature vector, formed by concatenating audio and text embeddings, is passed to
a classification model to predict whether an utterance is satirical or not. We explored three classification
approaches:
• Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP): This model consists of a two-layer feedforward neural network
at figure 4. Each hidden layer includes a linear transformation, followed by Batch Normalization
and ReLU activation. The final layer is a linear projection to the output space. This architecture,
shown in Figure 2.3.3, is designed to capture non-linear relationships between the multimodal
features.
• Logistic Regression: As a simpler alternative, we also experimented with a linear logistic
regression classifier directly applied to the concatenated multimodal vector. This model serves as
a lightweight yet efective approach in cases where the feature space is already well-structured.
• Support Vector Machine with RBF Kernel: To model more complex decision boundaries, we
employed a non-linear SVM with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel. This method is particularly
suited for handling the fused feature space where interactions between modalities may not be
linearly separable.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-5">
          <title>2.3.4. Ensemble Model</title>
          <p>To improve robustness and overall performance, we employed a hard voting ensemble that combines
three classifiers: a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Logistic Regression, and a Support Vector Machine
with RBF kernel. All use the same multimodal input—concatenated text embeddings from BETO and
audio embeddings from a CNN.</p>
          <p>A key design choice is the training duration of the CNN. While the MLP is trained for 20 epochs, the
CNN is fine-tuned for 100 epochs to produce more stable and refined audio features. This extended
training aims to improve the quality of audio embeddings and strengthen their influence within the
ensemble.</p>
          <p>Final predictions are made via hard voting, where each model votes and the majority class is selected.
This strategy stabilizes results and outperformed our expectations on the evaluation set.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Experimental Setup</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics</title>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-1">
          <title>3.1.1. Datasets</title>
          <p>To support these tasks, the organizers compiled a diverse dataset of annotated audio-text pairs from
various Spanish-language sources, including satirical programs and news broadcasts [11]. The data was
segmented and transcribed using state-of-the-art diarization and speech recognition systems [12, 13].
Despite growing interest in satire and irony detection, most prior studies have focused on unimodal
text analysis [4, 5, 6]. Recent works have shown the promise of leveraging large language models and
multimodal fusion techniques for satire detection, but research in Spanish—especially with spoken
content—remains limited [8].</p>
          <p>The dataset includes 6,000 training samples, 384 validation samples, and 2,000 unlabeled test samples,
with a nearly balanced class distribution, as shown in Table 1.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-2">
          <title>3.1.2. Task 1 – Text Satire Detection</title>
          <p>For Task 1, we used the oficial datasets provided by the organizers to train our models. To facilitate a
comprehensive understanding of the data, we present both the distribution summary and a sequence
length analysis. Table 1 shows the data split across training, validation, and test sets. The task involves
classifying each sample as either Satire or Non-satire. The training set contains 2,832 satire and 3,168
non-satire examples; the validation set contains 178 satire and 206 non-satire examples. The test set
comprises 2,000 unlabeled samples.</p>
          <p>Although a mild class imbalance exists, both categories are suficiently represented to enable efective
model training. These distributions serve as a foundation for both initial training and hyperparameter
tuning.</p>
          <p>Figure 6 illustrates the distribution of sequence lengths (i.e., number of words per sample) across
the two classes. The violin plots highlight density distributions, with both classes showing central
concentration between 40–70 words. However, the Satire class exhibits a wider range, extending up to
220 words. This suggests that satirical utterances may involve longer or more elaborate expressions
than factual ones. The median sequence lengths remain comparable across both classes, but the broader
spread in the satire class indicates higher variability.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-3">
          <title>3.1.3. Task 2 – Multimodal Satire Detection</title>
          <p>For Task 2, we extended the satire detection task into a multimodal setting by incorporating raw audio
alongside the text transcripts. While the dataset splits and class distributions remained identical to Task
1 (see Table 1), each sample was paired with an audio recording.</p>
          <p>Text preprocessing followed the same pipeline as in Task 1, including tokenization and
normalization. For audio, we extracted features such as Mel-frequency cepstral coeficients (MFCCs) directly
from the raw waveform to retain nuanced prosodic cues, such as exaggerated intonation or sarcastic
pacing—features essential for capturing satirical speech.</p>
          <p>Model performance was evaluated using precision, recall, and macro F1-score. As in Task 1, macro
F1 was used as the primary metric due to its ability to equally account for both classes under slight
imbalance. This consistent evaluation protocol allows meaningful comparisons between unimodal and
multimodal approaches.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2. System Settings</title>
        <p>For the text modality, we used two types of vector representations: BETO embeddings with 768
dimensions and TF-IDF vectors reduced to 300 dimensions using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD).
These representations were used consistently across all text-based models.</p>
        <p>For shallow classifiers such as Logistic Regression and RBF-SVM, we employed Optuna to perform
automatic hyperparameter optimization on the validation set.</p>
        <p>For the audio modality, the CNN used to generate audio embeddings was trained for 20 epochs with
a batch size of 16. The downstream MLP classifier was trained for 20 epochs with a batch size of 32.
Both the CNN and MLP were optimized using the Adam optimizer, with a fixed learning rate of 0.001.</p>
        <p>In the ensemble setup described for Task 2, we further fine-tuned the CNN independently for 100
epochs—five times longer than the MLP training schedule—to obtain more refined and stable audio
feature representations. This extended training was motivated by the need to enhance the contribution
of the audio stream within the final hard voting ensemble.</p>
        <p>Model
Logistic Regression (TF-IDF)
SVM (TF-IDF)
Logistic Regression (BETO)
XGBoost (BETO)
Final Ensemble (method 1+3+4 with Soft Voting)</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Experiment Results and Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.1. Task 1 - Text Satire Detection</title>
        <p>As shown in Table 4.1, the use of TF-IDF embeddings combined with Logistic Regression achieved an
F1-score of 0.8047, outperforming SVM (0.7929). This result suggests that even simple linear classifiers,
when combined with sparse lexical representations, can capture a significant portion of satire-related
patterns. However, these models may still be limited in capturing nuanced contextual information,
which is often essential in satire.</p>
        <p>Where BETO embeddings were used, we observed an improvement in performance. Logistic
Regression with BETO achieved the highest F1-score of 0.8291, while XGBoost slightly lagged at 0.8053. This
indicates that the BETO embeddings encode useful semantic and syntactic signals for satire detection,
and that a simple linear decision boundary is already efective when applied to rich contextual
representations. The relatively smaller gain from using XGBoost suggests that BETO embeddings are already
linearly separable to a large extent.</p>
        <p>Finally, the table presents the F1-scores of the three individual models alongside the result of their soft
voting ensemble. The ensemble method combines BETO + Logistic Regression, BETO + XGBoost, and
TF-IDF + Logistic Regression with respective weights of 0.4, 0.4, and 0.2. The final ensemble achieved the
best overall performance with an F1-score of 0.8345, outperforming all individual models. This confirms
that the models capture complementary patterns—BETO contributes deep semantic information, while
TF-IDF captures surface-level lexical features that may still be informative in certain satirical contexts.
The ensemble thus balances linear and non-linear decision boundaries, as well as shallow and deep
features, leading to a more robust and generalizable classifier.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>4.2. Task 2 - Multimodal Satire Detection</title>
        <p>Among the individual models, the combination of BETO embeddings with an MLP classifier yielded
the highest performance, achieving an F1-score of 0.8359. Building upon this, the final hard voting
ensemble—which integrates predictions from BETO-based models and the independently fine-tuned
CNN—achieved the best overall F1-score of 0.86164, demonstrating enhanced robustness and
generalization through multimodal model aggregation.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>This paper presented our approach to the SatiSPeech 2025 shared task on satire detection in Spanish.
For Task 1, which focused on text-based satire classification, we adopted a combination of shallow
learning techniques and pretrained language models. Specifically, we used BETO embeddings with
XGBoost and Logistic Regression to capture deep contextual semantics, while TF-IDF combined with
Logistic Regression was used to model broader, surface-level lexical patterns. This dual strategy allowed
us to exploit both fine-grained and general textual cues.</p>
      <p>In Task 2, which incorporated both audio and text modalities, we used a CNN architecture to extract
features from MFCC representations of the audio signal. These were then fused with text features
and passed to an MLP for classification. Notably, we took the same CNN used for feature extraction
and fine-tuned it independently on audio data for 100 epochs—five times longer than the default MLP
schedule. This extended training aimed to enhance the audio representation, and the resulting model
was added to the ensemble, contributing significantly to performance.</p>
      <p>By combining shallow models, deep embeddings, multimodal fusion, and a custom-trained CNN
audio encoder, our system achieved strong performance—ranking 4th in the oficial evaluation and
climbing to 2nd in the post-evaluation phase. The improvement was largely driven by our novel idea of
introducing a separately fine-tuned CNN dedicated to the audio stream in the ensemble. This result
demonstrates the power of tailored multimodal architectures and ensemble learning in complex tasks
like satire detection.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used ChatGPT and Grammarly in order to improve
writing style, perform grammar and spelling checks, and provide formatting assistance. Specifically,
these tools were employed to ofer suggestions for sentence structure and word choice to enhance
overall flow, to identify and correct grammatical errors and typographical mistakes that may have
been overlooked, and to ensure the paper adheres to the specific formatting guidelines required by the
conference proceedings. After using these tools/services, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content
as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the publication’s content.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>7. Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>This research was supported by The VNUHCM-University of Information Technology’s Scientific
Research Support Fund.
Languages Evaluation Forum (IberLEF 2025), co-located with the 41st Conference of the Spanish
Society for Natural Language Processing (SEPLN 2025), CEUR-WS.org, 2025.
[3] T. Jiang, H. Li, Y. Hou, Cultural diferences in humor perception, usage, and implications, Frontiers
in Psychology 10 (2019).
[4] M. Salas-Zárate, G. Alor-Hernández, J. L. Sánchez-Cervantes, M. Paredes-Valverde, J. L.
GarcíaAlcaraz, R. Valencia-García, Review of English literature on figurative language applied to social
networks, Knowledge and Information Systems 62 (2020) 2105–2137.
[5] L. Li, O. Levi, P. Hosseini, D. Broniatowski, A multi-modal method for satire detection using
textual and visual cues, in: Proceedings of the 3rd NLP4IF Workshop on NLP for Internet Freedom,
2020, pp. 33–38.
[6] R. Ortega-Bueno, P. Rosso, J. E. M. Pagola, Multi-view informed attention-based model for irony
and satire detection in Spanish variants, Knowledge-Based Systems 235 (2022) 107597.
[7] H. Bredin, A. Laurent, End-to-end speaker segmentation for overlap-aware resegmentation, in:</p>
      <p>Proceedings of Interspeech 2021, 2021, pp. 3111–3115.
[8] G. Wick-Pedro, C. F. da Silva, M. L. Inácio, O. A. Vale, H. de Medeiros Caseli, Using large
language models for identifying satirical news in Brazilian Portuguese, in: Proceedings of the 16th
International Conference on Computational Processing of Portuguese, 2024, pp. 156–167.
[9] T. Akiba, S. Sano, T. Yanase, T. Ohta, M. Koyama, Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter
optimization framework, in: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on
Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2019, pp. 2623–2631.
[10] J. Cañete, G. Chaperon, R. Fuentes, J.-H. Ho, H. Kang, J. Pérez, Spanish pre-trained BERT model
and evaluation data, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.02976 (2023).
[11] J. A. García-Díaz, R. Valencia-García, Compilation and evaluation of the Spanish SatiCorpus 2021
for satire identification using linguistic features and transformers, Complex &amp; Intelligent Systems
8 (2022) 1723–1736.
[12] H. Bredin, R. Yin, J. M. Coria, G. Gelly, P. Korshunov, M. Lavechin, D. Fustes, H. Titeux, W. Bouaziz,
M.-P. Gill, pyannote.audio: Neural building blocks for speaker diarization, in: Proceedings of the
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, 2020,
pp. 7124–7128.
[13] A. Radford, J. W. Kim, T. Xu, G. Brockman, C. McLeavey, I. Sutskever, Robust speech recognition
via large-scale weak supervision, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine
Learning (ICML), 2023, pp. 28492–28518.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Pan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
            <surname>García-Díaz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Bernal-Beltrán</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>García-Sánchez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Valencia-García</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Overview of SatiSPeech at IberLEF 2025:
          <article-title>Multimodal audio-text satire classification in Spanish</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural</source>
          <volume>75</volume>
          (
          <year>2025</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>González-Barba</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Chiruzzo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Jiménez-Zafra</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Overview of IberLEF 2025: Natural language processing challenges for Spanish and other Iberian languages</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the Iberian</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>