<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>V. Marhasova, S. Maliar, M. Ivanov, O. Garafonova, O. Kozyrieva, IT Team Building Process
Management based on a Competency Approach, Cybersecurity Providing in Information and
Telecommunication Systems. October</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33168/JSMS.2022.0601</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>object⋆</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ivan Tsmots</string-name>
          <email>Ivan.H.Tsmots@lpnu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andrii Pukach</string-name>
          <email>andriipukach@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Artem Kazarian</string-name>
          <email>Artem.H.Kazarian@lpnu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mariana Seneta</string-name>
          <email>Mariana.Y.Seneta@lpnu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Lviv Polytechnic National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>79000 Lviv</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>2021</issue>
      <fpage>1831</fpage>
      <lpage>1842</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The paper is devoted to presentation of the authors' proposed and developed new AI-based approach to the formation of customer support teams for software products, based on a multifactor portraits of candidates' perception subjectification of the support object. The proposed approach is based on the principle of taking into account the factors influencing the perception subjectification of the object of interaction - by the subjects of this interaction, with the subsequent formation of the corresponding personal / individual multifactor portraits of each of the subjects, as well as their comparative analysis when making decisions on the confirmation or rejection of each of the candidates (wishing to join the customer support team of the corresponding supported software product) based on their multifactor portraits. As a part of the research, as well as an example of the practical approbation of the proposed approach, a relevant practical applied problem of selecting the optimal candidate to replace the vacant position of a customer support team employee in place of the previous member who left, has been successfully resolved by using this approach.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;software product support</kwd>
        <kwd>impact factors</kwd>
        <kwd>perception subjectivization of the objects of interaction</kwd>
        <kwd>multifactor portrait</kwd>
        <kwd>team formation</kwd>
        <kwd>1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The modern requirements of the global IT market pose new challenges to software development
companies both in the field of direct software development and in the context of ensuring its
proper comprehensive support at all stages of the life cycle, one of which is, among other things,
customer support for clients, customers and end users of released software products.</p>
      <p>At the same time, there are a lot of relevant scientific and applied tasks and problems related to
the implementation of an appropriate level of customer support of software clients and end users.
One of such tasks is the formation of an effective and efficient, as well as well–balanced, software
customer support teams.</p>
      <p>From the other hand, another problem – is the need to take into account and research various
existing factors of perception subjectivization of customer support objects (which can be both the
supported software
products themselves as
well as the constituent processes of their
comprehensive support) by its subjects (participants of software products’ customer support
teams).</p>
      <p>The relevance of this problem lies in the fact that it is actually the perception subjectivization of
the interaction object(s) (for example, the supported software product, its comprehensive support
processes, or even its direct end users) by the subjects of this interaction – that significantly affects
the efficiency and effectiveness of the latter, since the discrepancy in subjective perception
(between members of support team, between customers or end users and support team members,
between support team members and programmers, etc.) leads to misunderstandings, which, in turn,
lead to the significant loss of precious time to eliminate these misunderstandings, negatively
affecting competitiveness in the modern global, highly dynamic IT services market.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related works</title>
      <p>
        The review of existing works and researches has been carried out in two key areas, one of which is
the area of research on customer support of software products, while the other one is the area of
research on team formation. In particular, the basic work [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] covers the issues of IT–support in a
rather comprehensive way, revealing an understanding of the main tasks and problems in this area,
the elimination of technical and other malfunctions, as well as an effective approach to isolating
problems so that they could be effectively resolved with the least disruption and with minimal
costs of productivity and available resources. The authors of the work [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] have conducted a
literature review devoted to the study of the advantages of using integrated systems in call–centers
as one of the key (and, in fact, the first in the chain among all other links of the practical
implementation of comprehensive customer support of any software products) links of customer
support. The work [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] is devoted to the study of existing literature sources on customer support
automation in the context of knowledge management, as well as the development of a theoretical
model of automated support systems that uses several methods to assist and automate the process
of processing and resolving users’ requests. The authors of study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] dedicate their research to the
creation of an intelligent user support assistant as a solution, based on machine learning, and
search in a two–level distributed knowledge repository, providing context–sensitive support and
taking into account the customers’ and users’ experience of using the supported software
product(s).
      </p>
      <p>The authors of research [5] conducted a comprehensive systematic review of relevant existing
works and researches on machine learning approaches in various scenarios of using the request
processing function in customer support services, and also provided analytical data on existing
limitations of machine learning in this area. In scope of study [6], the authors conducted a review
of current trends aimed at determining the current state of technology in the field of automated
customer support ticketing systems, according to which the creation of an automated incident
management tool is the main topic in this field, followed by escalation of requests and forecasting
customer sentiment, and it was also additionally established by the athors of this study that
random forest algorithms and the support vector method act as one of the best classification
algorithms in this applied field. At the same time, the authors of research [7] presented the
architecture of a customer support request processing system to improve the accuracy of the ir
predicted resolution time by performing a step–by–step hot coding of categorical variables and
then feature selection, after which a combination of classification and regression models is used in
a specialized prediction pipeline, finally concluding that the random forest regression model has
the best performance compared to the neural network and ADA boosting models.</p>
      <p>In scope of research [8] the author examines the structures, issues, and emerging technologies
that improve IT–support for large–scale corporate help desk applications, and also examines best
practices for service level agreements (SLAs), lifecycle management, and automation, addressing
issues of multi–level complexity, integration of legacy technologies, and data security, additionally
assessing indicators and future trends, in addition to artificial intelligence, cloud technologies, and
DevOps. In turn, work [9] is devoted to superficial assessment of the effectiveness of artificial
intelligence and automation in customer service and support, a study of the level of customer
satisfaction, and an analysis of problems associated with the integration of artificial intelligence
approaches into this area.</p>
      <p>While the paper [10] explores specific obstacles and issues related to data privacy and security,
such as: managing complex queries, preserving human influence, reducing algorithmic bias, and
integrating artificial intelligence with existing customer support systems, which also covers
strategies aimed at harmonizing efficiency and personalization, as well as future considerations for
improving artificial intelligence implementation, with the aim of creating a comprehensive
understanding of AI–based customer service for industry professionals and researchers seeking to
use artificial intelligencefor improving customer service and customer support experiences.</p>
      <p>In addition, work [11] emphasizes the importance of the impact of team building and team
building principles on the performance of not only these separate or specific teams, but also whole
companies in general. At the same time, another work [12] examined, analyzed and discussed
teamwork from the point of view of its development stages: the formation stage, the storming
stage, the norming stage and the execution stage, exploring the strategic impact of each stage on
the other. While the article [13] examines the impact of team building and teamwork in
organizations and their consequences for managers and employees, noting that team building
stimulates organizational productivity, service quality and overall positive indicators, and also
improves organizational development and efficiency, promotes continuous growth, open and
positive communication, as well as provides opportunities for development of trust and leadership
potential of their participants. Another paper [14] examines the concept of team building and
studies the relevant existing literature sources in order to determine whether team building
contributes to positive organizational outcomes, contributing to productivity, efficiency, and
competitive advantage, noting that organizations use team building to achieve high levels of task
performance and human resource support, as well as to stimulate and promote better productivity
and innovation(s). At the same time, the authors of [15] examine the issues of forming
development teams and attracting new people to existing teams, emphasizing the complete
empirical nature of these processes and the absence of a single common and universal method or
unique solution for solving these problems.</p>
      <p>Thus, the review of existing researches confirms the importance of the issues of both customer
support of software products (including, in particular, using advanced artificial intelligence
technologies) and the issues of team formation (both in the context of customer support, and in
general), while, at the same time, unfortunately leaving out of consideration an important nuance
of any intersubjective interaction of all participants in these processes, which is: the perception
subjectivization of the object of interaction – by the subjects of this same interaction, which
confirms the relevance, importance and the needs of performing additional researches in this
direction.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Method</title>
      <p>Thus, the main goal of the proposed and developed new approach is to ensure the possibility of
taking into account and consideration the influence of various relevant existing impact factors,
which lead to the perception subjectivization of the object of interaction – by each of the subjects
of this same interaction. At the same time, it should be immediately worth noting that the shares of
influence of each of the previously declared and agreed upon single set of common impact factors –
will differ (to a greater or lesser extent) for each of the subjects of interaction, thereby forming
individual, personalized, and somretimes even absolutely unique and quite unrepeatable,
multifactor portraits of the latter.</p>
      <p>While the impact factors themselves can be absolutely various factors that in one way or
another, to one degree or another, influence (and sometimes even distort) the objective reality of
the set of input characteristics of the object (with which researched subjects are interacting), which
leads to the formation of a subjective perception of this object – by each of the participants
(subjects) interacting with it. As a result, each of the subjects of joint (including team communities)
interaction with same single (common to all these subjects) object – interacts both directly with
this object and with all other subjects, through the prism of their subjective perception of this
object. Accordingly, the difference (and sometimes even total incompatibility) in the subjective
perception of the same object of interaction can lead to temporary or permanent
misunderstandings between the subjects, which, in turn, has an extremely negative impact on the
efficiency, quality, and effectiveness of their joint and common interaction.</p>
      <p>In the context of customer support of software products, the factor of perception
subjectivization of the object of interaction (for example, a supported software product, or the
constituent processes of its comprehensive support, the key of which is customer support of clients
and end users) plays a decisive role. That is why the development of an appropriate, presented in
the framework of this research, specialized approach to the formation of customer support teams of
software products based on multifactor portraits of perception subjectivization of the support
object by the candidate(s) is an urgent and quite relevant scientific and applied problem that needs
to be solved.</p>
      <p>The research [16] represents a specialized impact factors reverse analysis method for software
complexes’ support automation, where the main principles (of aforementioned method) are
outlined in maximum detail. In short, the main idea of that method is to implement the possibility
of identifying the share of presence of each of the previously declared set of impact factors on the
perception subjectivization of the supported software product or the components of its
comprehensive support processes. And in this specific case, the identification of theseshares of
presence of pre–declared impact factors is carried out on the basis of modeling the corresponding
situational cases within the framework of the corresponding pre–designed generalized model of
perception subjectivization of the investigated support object with an appropriate encapsulated
trained artificial neural network of a multilayer perceptron type.</p>
      <p>Thus, by modeling a set of situational cases for one specific researched subject of interaction
with the investigated support object, it becomes possible to obtain an appropriate individual (i.e.
personalized) multifactor portrait of perception subjectivization of the object of interaction (for
example: the supported software product itself, the components of its customer support processes,
or even the end users of this supported software product themselves) by this separate specific
researched subject (for example: a candidate for the customer support team of a certain supported
software product). Therefore, in this case, a multifactor portrait of perception subjectivization of
the support object is nothing more than a set of averaged values of the influence shares for each of
the impact factors based on a set of resulting values of processing the corresponding situational
cases for each individual subject. As for the source of initial data for such situational cases – they
are accumulated on the basis of a cognitive analysis of the subject’s activities in solving existing
problem(s) in the context of supporting a certain software product, namely: what actions were
taken by this subject, in what sequence/order they were taken, how the communication with a
client/user took place, as well as a number of other additional points, depending on the specific
needs.</p>
      <p>Expression (1) given below represents a dedicated specizlized developed mathematical model of
a multifactorial portrait of any particular interaction subject in the context of its personalized
perception of the object of any specific interaction, caused by the influence of previously declared
impact factors:</p>
      <p>m
SuPor =(GF1 ; GF 2 ; . . . ; GFn)=( j=1
∑ F1j
m
m
∑ F2j
; j=1
m</p>
      <p>m
; . . . ; ∑j=1 Fnj ),
m
(1)
where SuPor – a multifactor portrait of the research subject; GF1 – generalized share of influence
of the impact factor 1 onto the multifactor portrait of the researched subject; GF2 – generalized
share of influence of the impact factor 2 onto the multifactor portrait of the researched subject; GFn
– generalized share of influence of the impact factor n onto the multifactor portrait of the
researched subject; n – total amount of previously declared researched impact factors (common for
all subjects, regardless of any specific of them) influencing the perception subjectivization of the
investigated object of interaction; Fj1 – the share of presence of impact factor 1 (of the specific
researched subject's perception subjectivization of the researched interaction object) according to
the modelling results of j–th situational case; Fj2 – the share of presence of impact factor 2 (of the
specific researched subject's perception subjectivization of the researched interaction object)
according to the modelling results of j–th situational case; Fjm – the share of presence of impact
factor m (of the specific researched subject's perception subjectivization of the researched
interaction object) according to the modelling results of j–th situational case; m – total amount of
investigated and simulated situational cases of perception subjectivization of the interaction object
by the relevant separate specific researched subject.</p>
      <p>Figure 1 below describes a flowchart of the developed algorithm for forming software customer
support teams based on multifactor portraits of candidates' perception subjectivization of the
support object based on the results of the AI approach of existing impact factors reverse analysis
method for software complexes’ support automation.</p>
      <p>So, existing impact factors reverse analysis method for software complexes’ support automation
acts as a fundamental basis of the developed AI approach to forming software customer support
teams based on multifactor portraits of candidates' perception subjectivization of the support
object.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Results of the study</title>
      <p>Let’s consider the results of the research of the developed AI–based approach (to forming the
software customer support teams based on multifactor portraits of candidates' perception
subjectivization of the support object) on the example of solving a relevant practical applied
problem of selecting the optimal candidate to replace the vacant position of a customer support
team employee in place of the previous member who left. In this case, the "reference" multifactor
portrait of the candidate would be represented, in fact, by a multifactor portrait of the member who
left the existing customer support team. Table 1 below contains data of a multifactorial portrait of
the member who left an existing customer support team.</p>
      <p>In addition, Figure 2 below demonstrates a graphical interpretation of multifactor portraits of
investigated subjects – candidates for filling the vacant position of a customer support team
employee in place of the previous member who left, as well as multifactor portrait of that specific
member. Table 3 below provides comparative characteristics data (by each of the declared impact
factors) between each investigated subject (candidate for filling the vacant position of a customer
support team member) and the departed member who left the team.</p>
      <p>In addition, Figure 3 below shows a graphical interpretation of the comparative characteristics
(by each of the declared impact factors) between each investigated subject (candidate for filling the
vacant position of a customer support team member) and the departed member who left the team.</p>
      <p>Thus, as can be observed from Figure 3, the candidate subject with sequencial number 13
actually appeared to be the most optimal candidate for replacing the vacant position of a customer
support team employee in place of the previous member who left, since its deviation of the
multifactor portrait (in total by all declared impact factors) is minimal relative to the multifactor
portrait of the member who left. Thus, the results obtained during the practical approbation of the
developed approach (to forming software customer support teams based on multifactor portraits of
candidates' perception subjectivization of the support object) on the example of solving a relevant
practical applied problem (of selecting the optimal candidate to replace the vacant position of a
customer support team employee in place of the previous member who left) confirm the
effectiveness of the proposed approach, as well as its potential in solving a number of other similar
problems in the context of team building in the field of customer support, as well as within the
framework of any intersubjective interaction in general (regardless of applied area of this
interaction).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Discussions</title>
      <p>In work [17] authors investigate the issues of recruiting, as well as the process of team formation,
in IT companies using general scientific, interdisciplinary, economic and mathematical, statistical
and special methods, such as, in particular: a system approach, statistical grouping, graphic
analysis, selective observation, which act as the theoretical and methodological basis of the study,
which, however, unfortunately, do not take into account the factor of the perception
subjectivization of the object of interaction by the subjects of this same interaction while forming
these IT teams.</p>
      <p>At the same time, in the framework of work [18], the authors considered the issue of developing
a complex models for increasing the objectivity of the role assessment of the competencies of
applicants while recruiting specialists for an IT companies in conditions of uncertainty on the
platform of fuzzy sets, using, in particular, such theoretical methods of scientific knowledge as: the
method of information synthesis and analysis, the statistical method, the maximization method and
the Max–disjunction method; and also linguistic variables are given, as well as the basis of fuzzy
production rules and the dependencies establishment between the output variable and the input
data of the developed fuzzy model, which, unfortunately, does not take into account the factor of
perception subjectivization of the applicants.</p>
      <p>At the same time, the authors of research [19] investigate the aspect of team formation for IT–
field of cyber operations support, which is the first step in creating scalable structures for forming
cohesive, effective and balanced teams for conducting successful cyber operations support, using
special software for personality profiling, taking into account the quality and timeliness of the
output results after each cyber operation completion, team dynamics and the level of performance
of cybersecurity and cyber forensics tasks, creating a solid basis for the researchers' hypothesis that
creating teams based on individual profiles leads to better balance in the team and, therefore, to
higher productivity in performing tasks related to cybersecurity, compared to teams created only
on the basis of family ties or personal affiliation, which, however, like in previous studies,
unfortunately does not take into account the factor of perception subjectivization of the subjects
within the framework of their researched individual profiles.</p>
      <p>In another research [20], the authors presented a practical tool for team formation that allows
controlling the diversity of team members and the similarity between teams based on pre–selected
characteristics of candidates (using students as an example of such candidates), using input data in
the form of individual ratings of candidates for various characteristics, as well as specifications of
team size ranges, additionally taking into account the order of importance and the goal of diversity
of each characteristic that needs to be achieved in teams, i.e. heterogeneity or homogeneity, solving
a lexicographic linear programming problem with mixed integers, the result of which is the
distribution of candidates across teams that satisfies the given sizes and optimizes the diversity
goals in a given order, while promoting similarities between teams, taking into account diversity
criteria for both numerical and categorical characteristics, but unfortunately – not taking into
consideration the factor of perception subjectivization of the candidate.</p>
      <p>Therefore, unlike existing solutions, the proposed AI–based approach, presented in this
research, and developed for the purposes of formation a customer support teams (for supported
software products) based on multifactor portraits of candidates' perception subjectivization of the
support object – ensures the possibility of taking into account and consideration the factor of
perception subjectivization of the support object(s), which plays a critical role in the context of
ensuring the necessary level of mutual understanding between the participants in the component
processes of comprehensive support of software products, one of the key ones being a customer
support.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>A nowel AI–based approach to forming software customer support teams based on multifactor
portraits of candidates' perception subjectivization of the support object has been developed and
described in this research. The proposed approach is based on the principle of taking into account
the factors influencing the perception subjectivization of the interaction objects – by the subjects of
this same interaction, with the subsequent formation of the corresponding personal multifactor
portraits of each of the subjects, as well as their comparative analysis when making decisions on
the confirmation or rejection of each of the candidates (wishing to join thegiven customer support
team of the corresponding supported software product) based on their multifactor portraits. A
mathematical model of a multifactorial portrait of any particular interaction subject in the context
of its personalized perception of the object of any specific interaction, caused by the influence of
previously declared impact factors, has been developed, as well as a specialized algorithm for
forming software customer support teams based on multifactor portraits of candidates' perception
subjectivization of the support object based on the results of the AI approach of existing impact
factors reverse analysis method for software complexes’ support automation. The proposed
approach has been ssuccessfully approbated on the example of solving a relevant practical applied
problem of selecting the optimal candidate to replace the vacant position of a customer support
team employee in place of the previous member who left. While the obtained results of approbation
confirm the effectiveness of the proposed approach, as well as its potential in solving a number of
other similar and relevant problems in the context of team building in the field of customer
support, as well as within the framework of any intersubjective interaction in general, which could
be used as a prospect for further researches.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>The authors have not employed any Generative AI tools.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Halsey</surname>
          </string-name>
          , The IT Support Handbook, In Apress eBooks.
          <year>2024</year>
          ,
          <volume>252</volume>
          pages.
          <source>doi:10</source>
          .1007/979-8-
          <fpage>8688</fpage>
          -0385-7.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Berning</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Amadi-Echendu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Naidoo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Determining the Advantages of using Integrated Systems in Call Centres: A Literature Review</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management</source>
          .
          <year>2024</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>49</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>58</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .46254/af05.
          <fpage>20240020</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Dostál</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Skrbek</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Automation of Service Desk:
          <article-title>Knowledge Management Perspective</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery</source>
          ,
          <article-title>Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management</article-title>
          . Vol.
          <volume>3</volume>
          ,
          <issue>2021</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>204</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>210</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .5220/0010693100003064.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Rāts</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Pede</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Structuring and Controlling the Knowledge for the Software User Support</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Baltic Journal of Modern Computing</source>
          .
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <year>2021</year>
          ,
          <fpage>195</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>209</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .22364/bjmc.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>9</volume>
          .2.04.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>