<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>learning for predictive safety⋆</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Serhii Vladov</string-name>
          <email>serhii.vladov@univd.edu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andrii Nevynitsyn</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maria Pysmenna</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nataliia Vladova</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Volodymyr</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mazharov</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Artem Zelenskyi</string-name>
          <email>zelenskyi.artem7@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>L. Landau Avenue 27 61080 Kharkiv</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Ukrainian State Flight Academy</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Chobanu Stepana Street 1 25005 Kropyvnytskyi</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>This study aims to develop an intelligent method for the helicopter turboshaft engine's operational status monitoring based on analyzing the gas temperature in front of the compressor turbine and neural network diagnostic models. An integrated model for processing gas temperature signals in front of the compressor turbine has been developed. This model includes statistical normalization, a training dataset's homogeneity assessment, and defect detection algorithms based on the deviation of critical parameters from reference trajectories. The neural network architecture's choice is substantiated, and the data heterogeneity impact on the model's stability is assessed. A decision rule for engine technical condition has been developed, implementing adaptive threshold boundaries taking into account operational variability. Verification on real and synthetically extended datasets has confirmed increased diagnostic accuracy, a reduction in false alarms, and continued robustness to noise and parameter drift. The experimental results demonstrate the developed models' superiority over existing analogues in accuracy, completeness, and computational efficiency terms, which confirms their applicability in on-board monitoring systems for helicopter turboshaft engines in real time.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;paper template</kwd>
        <kwd>paper formatting</kwd>
        <kwd>paper template</kwd>
        <kwd>paper formatting</kwd>
        <kwd>paper template</kwd>
        <kwd>paper formatting</kwd>
        <kwd>paper template</kwd>
        <kwd>paper formatting</kwd>
        <kwd>paper template</kwd>
        <kwd>paper formatting</kwd>
        <kwd>CEUR-WS 1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Monitoring gas temperature sensor readings in helicopter turboshaft engines (TE) is a key
parameter for assessing the thermal state of the operating stage and the overall system’s
operational reliability [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The gas temperature in front of the compressor turbine (TG) directly
characterizes combustion modes and thermal loads on hot components, making it a sensitive
indicator of defect development, ranging from inefficient mixture formation and combustion
chamber degradation to increasing wear of compressor turbine blades and deposit formation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
Early-stage abnormalities in TG behavior precede a reduction in flight safety and an increased
probability of failure, necessitating systematic monitoring of this parameter in real time [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The practical implementation of TG monitoring is associated with a complex set of technical and
methodological challenges, including measurement errors and sensor drift, the presence of
systematic and random interference, multifactorial variability in engine operating modes, and the
need to identify significant anomalies within normal dynamics [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. Effective solutions to these
challenges require the robust signal preprocessing development and validation procedures,
adaptive models for predicting and detecting deviations, and methods for quantitatively assessing
the uncertainty and identified features' significance. Such a model’s integration into onboard expert
systems requires optimization of computational resources and reliability, which is critical for
implementation in aviation organizational and technical schemes.
      </p>
      <p>
        From a predictive safety perspective, TG monitoring provides the basis for implementing
preventive maintenance strategies, as early detection of degradation patterns allows for forecasting
the remaining life of the product, planning technical interventions, and reducing the unplanned
inflight failure risk [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. The scientific and technical relevance lies in the verifiable mathematical
development and statistical models capable of ensuring high sensitivity of defect detection with a
low false alarm rate, as well as in the decision-making rules formalization for operation and
maintenance. Existing gaps in methods for accounting for uncertainty, adapting to changing
conditions, and ensuring continuous monitoring make this area a priority for further research and
implementation in aviation practice.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related works</title>
      <p>
        Existing research in the helicopter TE TG monitoring field is primarily focused on three areas, such
as the development of methods for filtering and compensating for sensor errors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref7">6, 7</xref>
        ], the empirical
and physical-mathematical models for assessing the thermal state construction [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8 ref9">8, 9</xref>
        ], and the
diagnostic algorithms based on the creation of fixed deviation thresholds [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11 ref12">10–12</xref>
        ]. The vast
majority of this approach, for example [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref14 ref15">13–15</xref>
        ], is based on statistical processing of time series,
regression relationships between temperature and operating parameters, and thermodynamic
process models that allow the TG variation permissible ranges assessment in steady-state
conditions. These methods have proven themselves to be effective under a priori known operating
conditions. However, their sensitivity decreases under nonlinear dynamics and fast transient
processes.
      </p>
      <p>
        A separate category of studies is devoted to the machine learning methods application for
predicting and diagnosing the helicopter TE operational status. The most common solutions are
based on artificial neural networks [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16 ref17 ref18 ref19">16–19</xref>
        ], support vector machines [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20 ref21">20, 21</xref>
        ], gradient boosting
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22 ref23">22, 23</xref>
        ], and ARIMA models [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24 ref25">24, 25</xref>
        ], which are used for short-term predicting of engine
parameters and anomaly recognition. Despite the proven ability to identify complex nonlinear
dependencies, published solutions are generally not oriented towards operation in onboard
computing systems and rarely take into account the physical limitations of the engine, which
hinders their integration into safety decision-making loops.
      </p>
      <p>
        It is noted that a significant number of studies, for example [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26 ref27 ref28">26–28</xref>
        ], address the fault tolerance
issue in measurement channels, including outlier detection, noise smoothing, and recovery from
measurement gaps. However, these studies provide only fragmented coverage of the algorithm’s
adaptability to sensor degradation, drift in sensitive elements, and the adverse external factors’
impact (vibration, temperature cycling, and power supply instability). A unified approach is lacking
that would simultaneously assess measurement reliability, predict defect development, and
maintain continuous monitoring under data quality partial loss conditions.
      </p>
      <p>
        Thus, current diagnostic methods are primarily focused on threshold rules and fixed boundary
models, which limits their applicability in high variability conditions in gas turbine engine
operating modes. For example, in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29 ref30">29, 30</xref>
        ], the dynamically updating thresholds problems, taking
into account the operational context, engine aging, climatic conditions, individual characteristics of
the power plant, and its operating history, are practically not considered. This creates a
methodological gap between diagnostic models and real-world operating scenarios, where engine
thermal dynamics exhibit non-stationarity and pronounced inter-mode variability.
      </p>
      <p>Furthermore, a critically important but understudied aspect remains the formalized models’ lack
of integration of prediction, measurement reliability assessment, degradation detection, and
decision-making algorithms for onboard systems into a single computational framework. In
existing studies, for example, these modules are implemented separately, leading to the
accumulation of inconsistency, limiting scalability, and reducing the predictive output accuracy.
The integration lack also hinders a comprehensive predictive safety assessment development based
on the consistent processing of measurements, their uncertainties, and the thermal process inertia.</p>
      <p>Thus, the constructing an integrated models’ issues that:




</p>
      <p>Provides adaptive processing of gas temperature time series taking into account the sensor
channels’ degradation;
Combines predicting, diagnostics, and uncertainty assessment in a single algorithmic
framework;
Resistant to multi-mode operation and data incompleteness;
Feasible within on-board computing constraints;</p>
      <p>Supports the predictive solutions formation for preventive maintenance.</p>
      <p>The solution to the stated scientific and technical problems justifies the need to develop a
comprehensive intelligent model for monitoring gas turbine engines based on machine learning
methods, aimed at ensuring the helicopter TE operation’s predictive safety.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Materials and methods</title>
      <p>The proposed integrated intelligent model for monitoring the helicopter TE gas temperature in
front of the TG compressor turbine is a multi-component algorithmic circuit that combines models
for measurement, pre-processing, signal quality restoration, TG dynamics predicting, quantitative
uncertainty assessment, and predictive decisions formalization (Figure 1).</p>
      <p>The model is based on a physically informed designs and machine learning methods
combination with online parameter adaptation during the operating data accumulation. We denote
the engine operating parameter’s vector at time t as xt (including rotation speed, pressure, fuel
consumption, ambient temperature, etc.), the true value of the monitored parameter as TG,t, and the
observed sensor value as yt. The measurement model is defined by a stochastic relation
yt=T G ,t +bt +ηt ,
(1)
where bt is the slowly changing sensor drift (systematic error), ηt is the component distribution of
noise with zero mean and variance σ 2, allowing for the Gaussian and impulsive components
η
(mixture noise) mixing to model emissions.</p>
      <p>
        The true value TG,t dynamics is modeled as a physically sum based a priori predictor [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] and a
random residual term [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]:
      </p>
      <p>
        T G ,t=f p h ys ( xt , θ p h ys)+ ∆t ,
∆t=gML (ht , θML)+ ϵ t ,
(2)
where fphys(•) is a low-dimensional physical-empirical model of the thermal response (e.g., a
stationary map of the TG dependence on the operating parameters [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]), ht is a vector of features
obtained from a window vector of measurements and operating parameters (including time delays
yt−τ, derivatives, wavelet coefficients [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]), gML is a trainable nonlinear function (e.g., a recurrent
neural network with an attention mechanism [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ]), ϵt is a small stochastic residual. The proposed
additive decomposition ensures compliance with physical constraints while being able to
approximate complex nonlinear dynamics.
      </p>
      <p>
        Preprocessing and measurement quality assessment are implemented by a reconstruction
module combining adaptive filtering, outlier detection, and drift estimation. We propose using a
cascade consisting of a modified z-score for coarse outlier filtering, an adaptive Kalman filter for
measurement error estimation, and drift estimation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>
        ], implemented as follows:
s^t|t−1= A ∙ s^t−1|t−1 + B ∙ ut−1 ,
Pt|t−1= A ∙ Pt−1|t−1 ∙ A⊤ +Q ,
      </p>
      <p>−1
K t= Pt|t−1 ∙ H⊤ ∙ ( H ∙ Pt|t−1 ∙ H⊤ + Rt ) ,</p>
      <p>s^t|t = s^t|t−1 + K t ∙ ( yt− H ∙ s^t|t−1) ,
where st includes the estimate TG,t of the drift parameters bt, and the measurement noise covariance
Rt is updated based on the residual statistics, taking into account the detected outliers. For strong
nonlinear behavior, a particle filter with importance weights should be used, which preserves the
continuity of the estimation under unsmoothed noise.</p>
      <p>The prediction block consists of a hybrid architecture, including a physically informed prior
layer fphys, a trainable machine learning (ML) block gML, and a module for quantifying uncertainty
U(•). A combined loss function is used as the training criteria</p>
      <p>L (θ )= 1</p>
      <p>N 2
∙ ∑ (l pred (T^ G ,t , T G ,t )+ λunc ∙ lunc (T G ,t−T^ G ,t ) + λreg ∙ Ω (θ )) ,</p>
      <p>
        N t=1
where ℓpred is the base prediction error (Huber loss is applied for robustness), ℓunc is the uncertainty
calibration function (negative log-likelihood is applied for Gaussian estimation), σ^ t2 is the forecast
variance, Ω(θ) is the regularizer, and λ are hyperparameters. It is noted that for UQ, it is
recommended to use variational Bayesian methods [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>
        ], ensemble approaches [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>
        ], or Gaussian
Process [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>
        ] for small feature sets. At the same time, in the on-board implementation conditions,
approximation via deterministic ensembles with calibration (temperature scaling) is possible to
reduce the computational load [35, 36].
      </p>
      <p>The anomaly detector and the remaining life expectancy (RUL) prediction module rely on
calculated predictions and uncertainty. An anomaly is defined using a multivariate score as:
st=
|yt−T^ G ,t| ,
√ σ^ t2+ σ η
2
(3)
(4)
(5)
and a threshold detection rule st &gt; γ, where the threshold γ is selected based on the requirements
for the false alarm rate and sensitivity (ROC analysis) taking into account operational history. RUL
prediction is implemented through regression on degradation indicators dt (moving average, trend
slope, outlier frequency) followed by stochastic estimation of the time to reach the critical level τ*:
^RULt=min {∆ &gt;0|P ( T G ,t+∆&gt;T crit|Ft ) ≥ pt h},
(6)
where Tcrit is the permissible critical threshold, Ft is the information up to time t, and pth is the
permissible probability of exceeding it. The probability estimate ℙ(•) is extracted from the
distribution predicting using UQ or Bayesian predicting.</p>
      <p>A two-tier implementation strategy has been developed for integration into the on-board
environment:
“Heavy” offline module (full-featured training, physical parameters recalibration, updating
of ensembles);
“Lightweight” online core (an attempt to implement it in real time with limited resources).</p>
      <p>The online core uses tame models (pruned networks, quantized trees), adaptive noise covariance
calibration, and a mechanism for collective weight updating via transfer learning when connected
to the base station. An important requirement is the computational complexity control, within
which the estimated time complexity of the main predictive iteration must remain on the order of
O(m), where m is the number of input features in the window, memory and computation time are
limited by the onboard computer specifications.</p>
      <p>The decision-making rule is formalized as a deterministic-stochastic criterion, according to
which at each moment t three quantities are calculated, namely, the state estimate T^ G ,t, the
deviation rate st, and the predicted probability of reaching the critical level in the horizon Δh,
π t= P ( T G ,t+∆&gt;T crit|Ft ). The decision on the normal state or the detected defect is made according
to the logic:




</p>
      <p>If st ≤ γlow and πt ≤ plow, the state is considered normal;
If st &gt; γhigh or πt ≥ phigh, the instruction “defect and immediate inspection with subsequent
elimination required” is recorded;
In the intermediate zone γlow &lt; st &lt; γhigh or plow &lt; πt &lt; phigh, a warning is generated with a
requirement to increase the frequency of measurements, diagnostics, and launch extended
monitoring.</p>
      <p>The thresholds γlow, γhigh, plow, phigh are subject to verification and adaptation for each engine series
and operation type using historical data and ROC and precision-recall analysis with a target
operating point specified by the predictive safety requirements.</p>
      <p>Thus, the developed model ensures the process physics and adaptive machine learning
coordination, quantitative assessment of uncertainty and formalized decision-making, which makes
it suitable for implementation in a predictive maintenance system for helicopter TE, subject to
validation, calibration and certification procedures.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Results and discussion</title>
      <p>
        To conduct the computational experiment, a dataset consisting of synchronized time series of
sensor channels obtained during the TV3-117 TE flight tests was used. This dataset includes
measurements of the gas temperature in front of the compressor turbine (TG), the gas generator
(nTC), and the free turbine (nCB) rotor speed, ambient temperature (TN), vibration indicators,
preliminary sensor drift estimates, fuel consumption calculations, and associated service logs with
notes on technical operations [37, 38]. The dataset was collected in real operating modes (first and
second cruise modes, takeoff and climb modes, and transient processes) and contains a total of
approximately 20 hours of flight data (~7.2 · 105 samples at a sampling frequency of 1 Hz), ensuring
representativeness of multi-cycle dynamics and transient phenomena. Before use, the measurement
channels were calibrated and verified using reference data, pulse spikes were removed, and gaps
were restored using adaptive interpolation and particle-filter procedures. All numerical parameters
were then scaled using min-max normalization along the previously specified boundaries. To
validate and test the model architecture, some records were labeled by experts (fixed and confirmed
defects, preventive maintenance), and the data was divided into training, validation, and test sets,
maintaining temporal continuity and representativeness of the operating modes. All engine
parameter values were scaled to [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">0,1</xref>
        ] using min-max normalization as follows [39]:
xnorm=
      </p>
      <p>x− xmin ,
xmax− xmin</p>
      <p>TN</p>
      <p>Table 1 contains the following: Sample is a record identifier, TG is a current reading of the gas
temperature in front of the compressor turbine sensor (normalized), TG_lag is one-step reading delay;
nTC, nCB are the operating parameters (normalized speed), Fuel Flow is a fuel consumption, TN is an
ambient temperature, Vib. is a vibration indicator, Drift is a preliminary estimate of sensor drift,
TG_ma5 is a moving average over window 5, TG_next is a target mark (next actual value of TG),
normalized by the same rule.</p>
      <p>Based on the information presented in Table 1, a normalized dataset fragment is presented,
reflecting the input data structure for model training and validation, including current and lagged
gas temperature values, engine operating parameters, environmental characteristics, sensor drift
estimates, and the target TG predicted value. The presented data demonstrates a consistent
timebased mapping of features scaled to a single scale, ensuring the numerical stability of machine
learning algorithms and dynamic range comparability. Each record describes the powertrains’
instantaneous state, taking into account the historical context necessary for thermal inertia
reconstruction and predictive inference. The dataset structure is designed to support
multicomponent analysis, including prediction, uncertainty assessment, anomaly detection, and
degradation trend diagnostics.</p>
      <p>At the preprocessing stage, the training dataset homogeneity was assessed (Table 2) using
statistical and information-theoretical criteria that allow us to quantitatively characterize the
consistency of feature distributions, the variance balance level, and the latent cluster segmentation
presence. For the assessment, we used μ (mean) as a feature-level bias; σ (standard deviation) as a
value spread; and CV = σ (variation coefficient) as a relative dispersion (CV &lt; 0.33 is a high
μ
homogeneity; CV = 0.33…0.66 is a moderate; CV &gt; 0.66 is a heterogeneity); Skew (asymmetry) is a
distribution bias; Kurt (kurtosis) is the presence of heavy tails (outliers); Gap, %, is the missing
values proportion after cleaning; Trend flag is the presence of a long-period trend (“yes” or “no”).
The resulting metrics provide a comprehensive characterization of the data’s representativeness,
sensitivity to bias, and suitability for robust training of a predictive machine learning model. The
analysis results demonstrate a sufficient level of homogeneity in the feature space without critical
cluster isolation, confirming the statistical validity of the dataset’s further use in model training
and validation procedures [40, 41].</p>
      <p>TG</p>
      <p>TN
Fuel Flow</p>
      <p>Vib.</p>
      <p>Drift.</p>
      <p>TG_next</p>
      <p>μ</p>
      <p>Homogeneity analysis (Table 2) revealed that most key features exhibit low relative variance
(CV &lt; 0.2), are distributed nearly normally, and exhibit no significant missing data after
preprocessing, confirming their representativeness for training forecasting models. At the same
time, localized sources of heterogeneity were identified, for example, the vibrational channel
exhibits increased asymmetry and kurtosis, indicating rare impulsive disturbances, while the
ambient temperature feature exhibits a weak long-term trend. These deviations are not systemic
and can be effectively compensated for by robust cleaning (median or clipper filters), outlier
detection and processing, as well as detrending or introducing appropriate seasonal features into
the model. Taken together, the obtained metrics and the corrections performed allow us to
recognize the training dataset as sufficiently homogeneous and suitable for further training and
validation of the proposed forecasting architecture, provided that the specified measures for
accounting for the identified heterogeneities are applied.</p>
      <p>This study implemented a full cycle of solving the applied problem of predictive monitoring of
helicopter TE temperature using the developed intelligent model. A normalized dataset was
synthesized containing current and lagged TG values (TG(t), TG(t – 1), TG(t – 2)), turbocharger and
free turbine rotor speeds, ambient temperature, etc. (see Table 1). Based on this dataset, a
regression TG prediction model was trained, using time dependencies and engine operating mode
Actual Tg
Predicted Tg
a
400</p>
      <p>c
Tg Signal
Anomaly Points</p>
      <p>0.1
e
u
laV0.05
l
a
u
ised 0
R
-0.05</p>
      <p>0</p>
      <p>Figure 2a demonstrates high agreement between the actual and predicted values of the
normalized gas temperature. The approximation follows the main trend of the signal without
systematic bias, which is confirmed by the small values of MAE = 0.0183 and RMSE = 0.0236.
However, periodic discrepancies are observed mainly in transient intervals, which indicates
remaining nonlinearities that are not fully approximated by the linear model. Figure 2b shows that
the residuals are concentrated around zero with rare peaks, while the residuals distribution does
not exhibit a stable drift, but local positive (or negative) peaks indicate short-term violations of the
model during rapid dynamic changes. Figure 2c demonstrates a multi-mode structure of gas
generator rotor speed with pronounced periodic oscillations that correlate with TG changes. It is
noted that such cyclic component presence emphasizes the need to include phase or spectral
features in the predictive model to improve accuracy in transient modes. Figure 2d shows that the
outlier isolation algorithm identified a limited number of points (is 8) located in intervals with
abnormally high residuals or rapid TG spikes. It is noted that the spatial coincidence with peaks in
the residual plot indicates that the detector correctly identifies significant deviations but requires
an analysis of the causes (sensor artifacts versus actual operational anomalies) to reduce the false
positives likelihood. Figure 2e displays a slow, long-term trend in external temperature, which can
introduce a bias into the baseline TG level during long-term operation. The identified trend justifies
the detrending or seasonality features’ inclusion in the model and the adaptive calibration use to
minimize the external climatic factors’ influence on the predictive safety decision.</p>
      <p>Table 3 presents comparative results for the developed method and its closest analogues,
including neural network and classical algorithms for predicting gas temperature and detecting
anomalies in helicopter gas turbine engine dynamics. The presented indicators characterize
forecast accuracy, completeness and reliability of anomaly detection, computational efficiency, and
the ability to provide early warning of deviations.</p>
      <p>The developed integrated method demonstrates the best performance in key metrics. It is MAE
= 0.012 and RMSE = 0.016, which outperforms the closest LSTM benchmark (MAE = 0.015, RMSE =
0.020) and XGBoost (MAE = 0.017, RMSE = 0.022). The F1-score for anomaly detection reaches 0.90
(LSTM is 0.81, XGBoost is 0.77), indicating a better balance between detection accuracy and recall.
The developed method provides a significant lead in detection (lead time is 12 samples) with a low
false alarm rate (is 0.5 %), which is critical for predictive security. Similar indicators for similar
methods are noticeably worse (for LSTM lead time is 8, false alarm is 1.2 %). Moreover, the
proposed neural network architecture remains compact and computationally efficient (inference ≈5
ms/sample, model size is 2.5 MB), while more complex models yield a worse combination of
accuracy and resource consumption (for LSTM 20 ms/sample, 15 MB). The obtained results confirm
the physically-informed hybrid approach advantage taking into account UQ and adaptive filtering
for short-term TG prediction and early degradation detection.</p>
      <p>Despite the achieved results, the developed method has a number of objective limitations that
require further development:</p>
      <p>Dependence on the quality and representativeness of the training dataset. A limited set of
operating modes and an imbalance between true defects classes reduce the model’s
generalization ability in rare or novel scenarios. This limitation can be addressed by
expanding the dataset through physically based synthetic failure modeling and using
domain adaptation and active learning methods to prioritize the rare events labeling.
Computational and hardware load during online implementation of UQ and ensemble
schemes. Fully functional Bayesian estimates and large ensembles are difficult to implement
on onboard computers with strict resource constraints. This limitation can be addressed
through research into model compression and distillation methods, approximate Bayesian
techniques (e.g., MC-Dropout, SWAG), quantization optimization, and the hardware
accelerators (FPGA, ASIC) implementation.
3. Limited drift model and incomplete accounting of sensor channel’s multifactorial
degradations. The current approximate representation of drift may not reflect the complex
cause-and-effect structure of real sensor failures. This limitation can be addressed through
the development and verification of hierarchical Bayesian drift models, the change-point
detection procedures implementation, and the continuous learning with supervised
adaptation to new trends implementation.</p>
      <p>Thus, a method for the helicopter TE gas temperature in front of the integrated turbine
compressor monitoring has been developed. This method combines physically informed models,
adaptive preprocessing and signal recovery, nonlinear machine learning modules with uncertainty
assessment, and anomaly detection mechanisms. This ensures increased accuracy of short-term TG
predicting, early warning of degradation, and a lightweight online core feasibility for ensuring
predictive safety.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>The development of a comprehensive intelligent model for monitoring the helicopter turboshaft
engine’s gas temperature in front of the compressor turbine is presented and substantiated. This
model combines a physically-informed a priori, adaptive signal preprocessing and recovery
procedures, a nonlinear machine learning block taking into account time delays, and a module for
quantitative uncertainty assessment. The key methodological elements are a stochastic
measurement model accounting for drift and a noise mixture, an adaptive filtering cascade for
estimating the gas temperature and drift, and an additive decomposition of the gas temperature
dynamics, which ensures the physical constraints preservation while flexibly approximating
nonlinearities.</p>
      <p>It is shown that the key feature of the developed method is the UQ module integration directly
into the training and decision-making procedure (calibrated predictive variance), the anomaly score
metrics formalization taking into account predictive variance, and a two-tier implementation
strategy development (full-featured offline training with lightweight online kernel with pruned or
quantized models). A practically important contribution is the method for adaptive detection
threshold estimation and probabilistic prediction, which translates the model’s output into
operational instructions for maintenance.</p>
      <p>Experimental validation on a training dataset consisting of TV3-117 engine parameters
demonstrated a significant improvement in forecast and detection quality compared to the closest
analogues (MAE is 0.012, RMSE is 0.016, F1-score (anomaly) is 0.90, detection lead time is 12
samples with a false alarm rate is 0.5%). At the same time, a compromise solution was implemented
in of inference computational efficiency terms is 5 ms per sample and model size is 2.5 MB,
confirming the practical suitability of the lightweight online kernel for onboard computers.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The research was supported by the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine “Theoretical and applied
aspects of the development of the aviation sphere” under Project No. 0123U104884.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>During the preparation of this work, the authors used OpenAI GPT-5 in order to: Grammar and
spelling check. After using these tools/services, the authors reviewed and edited the content as
needed and takes full responsibility for the publication’s content.
[35] W. Gao, M. Pan, W. Zhou, F. Lu, J.-Q. Huang, Aero-Engine Modeling and Control Method with
Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning, Aerospace 10:3 (2023) 209. doi:
10.3390/aerospace10030209.
[36] K. V. Santhosh, B. K. Roy, An intelligent temperature measurement technique using J type
thermocouple with an optimal neural network, Sensors and Transducers, 147:12 (2012), 6–14.
[37] S. Vladov, M. Petchenko, Y. Shmelov, S. Drozdova, R. Yakovliev, Helicopters Turboshaft
Engines Parameters Identification at Flight Modes Using Neural Networks, In Proceedings of
the 2022 IEEE 17th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Information
Technologies (CSIT), Lviv, Ukraine, 10–12 November 2022, pp. 5–8. doi:
10.1109/csit56902.2022.10000444.
[38] S. Vladov, Y. Shmelov, R. Yakovliev, Method for Forecasting of Helicopters Aircraft Engines
Technical State in Flight Modes Using Neural Networks, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 3171
(2022) 974–985. URL: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3171/paper70.pdf
[39] C. M. Stefanovic, A. G. Armada, X. Costa-Perez, Second Order Statistics of Fisher-Snedecor
Distribution and Their Application to Burst Error Rate Analysis of Multi-Hop
Communications, IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society 3 (2022) 2407–2424. doi:
10.1109/ojcoms.2022.3224835.
[40] H.-Y. Kim, Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test,</p>
      <p>Restorative Dentistry &amp; Endodontics 42:2 (2017) 152. doi: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152.
[41] N. Shakhovska, V. Yakovyna, N. Kryvinska, An improved software defect prediction algorithm
using self-organizing maps combined with hierarchical clustering and data preprocessing.
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 12391 (2020) 414–424. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59003-1_27.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Cai</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>H. Zhang,</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>An optimal speed control method of multiple turboshaft engines based on sequence shifting control algorithm</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 144:4</source>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <article-title>041003</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1115/1.4053088.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Cai</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>H. Zhang,</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>An optimal speed control method of multiple turboshaft engines based on sequence shifting control algorithm</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 144:4</source>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <article-title>041003</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1115/1.4053088.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. de Voogt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>St. Amour</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Safety of twin-engine helicopters: Risks and operational specificity</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Safety Science</source>
          <volume>136</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <article-title>105169</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.ssci.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>105169</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Kong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Review on advanced health monitoring methods for aero gas turbines using model based methods and artificial intelligent methods</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Aero-nautical and Space Sciences</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          :
          <issue>2</issue>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <fpage>123</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>137</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .5139/IJASS.
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <volume>15</volume>
          .2.123.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. de Voogt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nero</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Technical Failures in Helicopters:
          <string-name>
            <surname>Non-Powerplant-Related</surname>
            <given-names>Accidents</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Safety</source>
          <volume>9</volume>
          :
          <issue>1</issue>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <article-title>10</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/safety9010010.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Vladov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Scislo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Sokurenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Muzychuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Vysotska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Osadchy</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Sachenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Neural Network Signal Integration from Thermogas-Dynamic Parameter Sensors for Helicopters Turboshaft Engines at Flight Operation Conditions</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Sensors</source>
          <volume>24</volume>
          :
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <article-title>4246</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/s24134246.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Xiao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Xiao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Application of physical-structure-driven deep learning and compensation methods in aircraft engine health management</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence</source>
          <volume>136</volume>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <article-title>109024</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.engappai.
          <year>2024</year>
          .
          <volume>109024</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Castiglione</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Perrone</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Strafella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ficarella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Bova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Linear model of a turboshaft aero-engine including components degradation for control-oriented applications</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Energies</source>
          <volume>16</volume>
          :
          <issue>6</issue>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <article-title>2634</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/en16062634.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Aygun</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Thermodynamic, environmental and sustainability calculations of a conceptual turboshaft engine under several power settings</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Energy</source>
          <volume>245</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <article-title>123251</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.energy.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>123251</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Yepifanov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Bondarenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Development of Turboshaft Engine Adaptive Dynamic Model: Analysis of Estimation Errors, Transactions on Aerospace Research</source>
          <year>2022</year>
          :
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>59</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>71</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .2478/tar-2022
          <source>-0024</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.
          <string-name>
            <surname>-L. Tang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A Probabilistic</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Design</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Methodology for a Turboshaft Engine Overall Performance Analysis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Advances in Mechanical Engineering</source>
          <volume>6</volume>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>976853</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1155/
          <year>2014</year>
          /976853.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Ji</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Real-time optimization control of variable rotor speed based on Helicopter/ turboshaft engine on-board composite system</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Energy</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>301</volume>
          ,
          <issue>131701</issue>
          ,
          <year>2024</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.energy.
          <year>2024</year>
          .
          <volume>131701</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Hu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Hu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Dynamic modeling and characteristic analysis of a helicopter main reducer for tooth crack diagnosis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Measurement</source>
          <volume>247</volume>
          (
          <year>2025</year>
          )
          <article-title>116823</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.measurement.
          <year>2025</year>
          .
          <volume>116823</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Yepifanov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Bondarenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Development of Turboshaft Engine Adaptive Dynamic Model: Analysis of Estimation Errors, Transactions on Aerospace Research</source>
          <year>2022</year>
          :
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>59</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>71</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .2478/tar-2022-0024.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Kang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Ji</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Yuan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Ye</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Autonomous helicopter shipboard recovery flight control design based on tau theory</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Aerospace Science and Technology</source>
          <volume>159</volume>
          (
          <year>2025</year>
          )
          <article-title>109956</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.ast.
          <year>2025</year>
          .
          <volume>109956</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Vladov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Shmelov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Yakovliev</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Optimization of Helicopters Aircraft Engine Working Process Using Neural Networks Technologies, CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          <volume>3171</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>1639</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1656</lpage>
          . URL: https://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-
          <volume>3171</volume>
          /paper117.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Vladov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Vysotska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Sokurenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Muzychuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Nazarkevych</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Lytvyn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Neural Network System for Predicting Anomalous Data in Applied Sensor Systems, Applied System Innovation</source>
          <volume>7</volume>
          :
          <issue>5</issue>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <article-title>88</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/asi7050088.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Du</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W. Han,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Kang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Luo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Liao</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
            <surname>Peak-Finding Siamese Convolutional Neural</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Network (PF-SCNN) for Aero-Engine Hot Jet FT-IR Spectrum Classification</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Aerospace</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          :
          <issue>9</issue>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <article-title>703</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/aerospace11090703.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Xia,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Structural Reliability Analysis of Aero-Engine Turbine Components Based on Particle Swarm Optimization Back Propagation Neural Network, Applied Sciences 15:6</source>
          (
          <year>2025</year>
          )
          <article-title>3160</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/app15063160.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.-P.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.-K.</given-names>
            <surname>Hu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>An improved weighted one class support vector machine for turboshaft engine fault detection</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence</source>
          <volume>94</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>103796</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.engappai.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>103796</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Grehan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Ignatyev</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Zolotas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Fault Detection in Aircraft Flight Control Actuators Using Support Vector Machines</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Machines</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          :
          <issue>2</issue>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <article-title>211</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/machines11020211.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Vladov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Banasik</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Sachenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kempa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Sokurenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Muzychuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Pikiewicz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Molga</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Vysotska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Intelligent Method of Identifying the Nonlinear Dynamic Model for Helicopter Turboshaft Engines</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Sensors</source>
          <volume>24</volume>
          :
          <fpage>19</fpage>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <article-title>6488</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/s24196488
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          [23]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Shang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Si</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Pan</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H. Liu,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Flight Trainee Performance Evaluation Using Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Convolutional Neural Network (GBDT-PSO-CNN) in Simulated Flights</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Aerospace</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          :
          <issue>5</issue>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <article-title>343</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/aerospace11050343.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          [24]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Cui</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Xiang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Han</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J. Chen,
          <source>Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Aero-Engines Based on Time-Series Decomposition Modeling and Similarity Comparisons, Aerospace</source>
          <volume>9</volume>
          :
          <fpage>10</fpage>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <article-title>609</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/aerospace9100609.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          [25]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Berghout</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L.
          <string-name>
            <surname>-H. Mouss</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kadri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Saïdi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Benbouzid</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Aircraft Engines Remaining Useful Life Prediction with an Improved Online Sequential Extreme Learning Machine</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Applied Sciences 10:3</source>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>1062</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/app10031062.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          [26]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Raikar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Ganguli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Denoising Signals Used in Gas Turbine Diagnostics with Ant Colony Optimized Weighted Recursive Median Filters</article-title>
          ,
          <source>INAE Letters 2:3</source>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
          <fpage>133</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>143</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s41403-017-0023-y.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          [27]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Mohammadi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. A. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Fashandi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Jafari</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Nikolaidis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A scientometric analysis and critical review of gas turbine aero-engines control: From Whittle engine to more-electric propulsion</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Measurement and control</source>
          <volume>54</volume>
          :
          <fpage>5</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>6</lpage>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>935</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>966</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1177/0020294020956675.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          [28]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Liang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Feng</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Tan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Kalman Filter Based High Precision Temperature Data Processing Method, Frontiers in Energy Research</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3389/fenrg.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>832346</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          [29]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Hu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Miao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Shen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Sun</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Intelligent Performance Degradation Prediction of Light-Duty Gas Turbine Engine Based on Limited Data, Symmetry</source>
          <volume>17</volume>
          :
          <issue>2</issue>
          (
          <year>2025</year>
          )
          <article-title>277</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/sym17020277.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          [30]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Lu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Gas Turbine Transient Performance Tracking Using Data Fusion Based on an Adaptive Particle Filter, Energies</source>
          <volume>8</volume>
          :
          <fpage>12</fpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <fpage>13911</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>13927</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/en81212403.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>
          [31]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Guo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Ren</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>New Method for Improving Tracking Accuracy of Aero-Engine OnBoard Model Based on Separability Index and Reverse Searching</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Aerospace</source>
          <volume>12</volume>
          :
          <issue>3</issue>
          (
          <year>2025</year>
          )
          <article-title>175</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/aerospace12030175.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation>
          [32]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Dang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Shao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Sun</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Deng</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Risk Analysis Method of Aviation Critical System Based on Bayesian Networks and Empirical Information Fusion, Electronics</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          :
          <fpage>12</fpage>
          (
          <year>2025</year>
          )
          <article-title>2496</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/electronics14122496.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation>
          [33]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Xiong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Tan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Cao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Hong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Lu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Ensemble Modeling Method for Aero-Engines Based on Automatic Neural Network Architecture Search Under Sparse Data</article-title>
          .
          <source>Aerospace</source>
          <volume>12</volume>
          :
          <issue>9</issue>
          (
          <year>2025</year>
          )
          <article-title>804</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/aerospace12090804
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation>
          [34]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Tang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M. Chen,
          <article-title>Gaussian Process Model-Based Performance Uncertainty Quantification of a Typical Turboshaft Engine</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Applied Sciences 11:18</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <article-title>8333</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/app11188333.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>