<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>September</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Added-value of Using Open Government Data in Citizen Participation</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Antoine Clarinval</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jonathan Crusoe</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT, Swedish School of Library and Information Science, University of Borås</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Borås</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="SE">Sweden</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Swedish Center for Digital Innovation, Department of Applied IT, University of Gothenburg</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Götebörg</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="SE">Sweden</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Swedish Center for Digital Innovation, Department of Informatics, Umeå University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Umeå</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="SE">Sweden</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>2025</issue>
      <fpage>0000</fpage>
      <lpage>0003</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>One recognized benefit of Open Government Data (OGD) publishing by municipalities is improvements and new opportunities for public action transparency and citizen participation (CP). However, compared to OGD-driven economic value creation, the integration of OGD into CP projects has received little attention. As a result, there is still limited understanding of the value such CP projects deliver for the municipality publishing OGD and for the citizens. After analyzing unexploited data from a study we previously conducted, we identify qualities of CP projects associated with higher added-value for the municipality and the citizens.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Open Government Data</kwd>
        <kwd>Citizen participation</kwd>
        <kwd>Personal Construct Theory</kwd>
        <kwd>Repertory Grid Technique</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction and Background</title>
      <p>
        In a previous study, we identified archetypes of citizen participation (CP) projects using OGD and
we researched where OGD and CP practitioners see the added-value of OGD in CP projects [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. We
employed the Repertory Grid Technique (RGT) and conducted interviews with 10 Belgian and Swedish
practitioners to capture their viewpoint on the value added by OGD to CP projects. The idea of the
RGT is to ask informants to work with a set of elements (i.e., in this case, CP projects using OGD) and
to formulate pairs of constructs that they would use to diferentiate the elements [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. The informants
are then asked to rate the elements on each construct pair and on a set of readily provided constructs.
By comparing the similarity of the ratings given to the formulated constructs and to the provided
constructs, it is possible to identify which informant-formulated constructs are the most important to
explain the provided constructs [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], or, in other terms, when they think of the provided construct, what
lies behind in the informants’ mind. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], we report on the findings related to one provided construct,
which is the added-value brought by OGD to the CP project. However, the data we collected includes
two additional constructs, namely the added-value that by the CP project brings to the municipality
and the added-value that the CP project brings to the citizens.
      </p>
      <p>With this poster, we aim to give an brief account of findings not covered by our previously published
article and to bring attention around the Repertory Grid Technique, which is very rarely used in Digital
Government research. Using our research as a demonstration of this methodology, we would like to
engage in discussions on how our field can benefit from it and its unique ability to elicit
informantgenerated constructs that can enrich the development of theories.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Results and Discussion</title>
      <p>
        Using the same construct categories as in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], we found diferent project qualities that are, according to
the interviewed practitioners, associated with higher added-value for the municipality and for citizens
(Table 1). It is noteworthy that several qualities difer across the two. In total, 86 projects were rated by
the practitioners and sorted by archetype (see a description of the archetypes in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]). Figure 2 shows the
distribution of added-value ratings across CP project archetypes. Due to the diferent ways in which
they can be implemented as well as viewpoint diferences across practitioners, projects within the same
archetype are associated with difering added-value. The case of the OGD-based analytics is especially
interesting. Despite being the rarest encountered archetype, it scores the highest added-value for both
the municipality and citizens. Lastly, we also found diferences across Swedish and Belgian practitioners.
While their ratings are similar on average on the added-value for citizens, Swedish practitioners rate
the added-value for the municipality substantially higher compared to Belgians. Even though these
ifndings were obtained from a limited sample of informants, they reveal promising research areas.
Category [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] Higher added-value for the municipality Higher added-value for citizens
Impact on citizens’ daily life More forward-looking issues Issues impacting daily decisions of citizens
Scale of the participation Local Local
Involvement of citizens (inde- Reduced number of citizens involved face-to-face that Many citizens have the opportunity to participate
onpendent from data) play an active role line at diferent phases of the project
Theme of the participation Specialized theme (e.g., tourism or environment) Budget-related theme
Sought behavior Data not discussed and used to take decisions Data is discussed and used to give information or
create something
Involvement of citizens (data- Data is obtained from citizens Data from diferent sources is used to make citizens
centric) react
Data attributes Geolocalized objective data subject to interpretation Objective data subject to interpretation
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>The author(s) have not employed any Generative AI tools.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Clarinval</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Crusoe</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Simonofski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Open government data for citizen participation: Where is the added-value?</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the 2025 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences</source>
          ,
          <year>2025</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>2189</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2198</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Curtis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Wells</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Higbee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
            <surname>Lowry</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>An overview and tutorial of the repertory grid technique in information systems research</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Communications of the Association for Information Systems</source>
          <volume>23</volume>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
          <fpage>37</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>62</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Honey</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The repertory grid in action: How to use it to conduct an attitude survey</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Industrial and Commercial Training</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <year>1979</year>
          )
          <fpage>452</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>459</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>