<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Methodology for assessing computer security levels⋆</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Volodymyr Akhramovych</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vadym Akhramovych</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Anna Ilyenko</string-name>
          <email>anna.ilienko@npp.kai.edu.ua</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Olha Kryvokulska</string-name>
          <email>olha.kryvokulska@npp.kai.edu.ua</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Viktoriia Zhebka</string-name>
          <email>viktoria_zhebka@ukr.net</email>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>58</fpage>
      <lpage>71</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This article examines a dynamic model of a computer information security system, taking into account factors that affect its stability. The stability of the protection system is analyzed, and the dependence of its behavior on parameters that affect the level of security is considered. The protection system is presented as a dynamic system in a mathematical sense, the state of which changes according to the given laws of evolution. Theoretical research was carried out using mathematical models formulated in the form of differential equations, with their subsequent implementation in the MATLAB/Multisim environment. The phase portraits of the system indicate its stability in the working range of parameters even under conditions of maximum external influence. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the presentation of a computer security assessment system in the form of a nonlinear dynamic model that takes into account the relationships between key security parameters. Unlike existing studies that focus on individual aspects (antivirus protection, cryptographic algorithms, access policies), the proposed approach allows for a quantitative assessment of the impact of a set of internal and external factors on the stability of the system, as well as determining the dynamics of its behavior in real time.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;computer</kwd>
        <kwd>protection system</kwd>
        <kwd>influencing factors</kwd>
        <kwd>dynamic system</kwd>
        <kwd>nonlinearity</kwd>
        <kwd>differential equations</kwd>
        <kwd>stability</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The problem of protecting information from unauthorized access and unwanted influence has
existed for as long as the concept of valuable information itself. With the development of
automated control systems, network technologies, and personal computers, the issue of data
protection has taken on new relevance.</p>
      <p>The problem of ensuring computer security has become increasingly complex in recent decades,
as information technologies have deeply penetrated into all spheres of human activity. Modern
information systems are exposed to a wide spectrum of threats, ranging from hardware and
software failures to sophisticated cyberattacks aimed at disrupting the confidentiality, integrity,
and availability of information. According to recent reports by ENISA and ISO/IEC 27001
standards, the number and diversity of threats are steadily increasing, requiring more advanced
and adaptive protection mechanisms.</p>
      <p>Traditional approaches to computer security mainly rely on separate tools such as antivirus
software, firewalls, cryptographic protocols, and access control policies. While these methods
remain effective for mitigating specific types of threats, they do not provide a holistic view of the
system’s resilience, particularly</p>
      <p>when complex interdependencies between parameters are
considered. In this context, mathematical modeling of computer security systems as dynamic
nonlinear systems has gained importance, since it allows for the quantitative evaluation of</p>
      <p>
        0000-0002-0086-9131 (V. Akhramovych); 0009-0003-2787-8745 (V. Akhramovych); 0000-0001-8565-1117 (A. Ilyenko);
0009-0003-8518-6915 (O. Kryvokulska); 0000-0003-4051-1190 (V. Zhebka)
challenges, the present study aims to develop and analyze a nonlinear differential model of a
computer protection system, focusing on its stability and the dynamic impact of both internal and
external parameters. Such an approach not only complements existing studies but also provides a
universal framework for quantitative assessment of information security at the level of an
individual computer [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">1, 2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Factors contributing to increased information security requirements include: growth in data
volumes and their concentration in shared databases; multitasking and real-time operation;
automation of data exchange over long distances; the development of global networks and financial
systems, which have become targets of cybercrime [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">3, 4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Therefore, studying the impact of computer system parameters on the effectiveness of
information protection is a task of both practical and theoretical importance.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Problem statement</title>
      <p>
        Recent studies on computer and information security can be divided into two major directions. The
first group focuses on practice-oriented solutions, including protection against hardware and
software failures, recovery of lost data, and methods of countering malicious software and fraud
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11 ref5 ref6 ref7 ref8 ref9">5–11</xref>
        ]. These works provide valuable insights for practitioners, yet they often lack a systemic view
of the computer as an interconnected dynamic system.
      </p>
      <p>
        Article [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ] examines the issue of quantitatively determining the level of information security
on a personal computer depending on the impact of internal and external threats. Factors such as
user identification and authentication, data integrity and authenticity control, backup, access
control, firewall operation, auditing, antivirus protection, as well as risks associated with software
and hardware failures are considered [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]. The impact of the speed and volume of data leakage, loss
of trust between users, and system scale on the level of security is analyzed separately. decay; as
well as fluctuations taking into account dissipative characteristics. At the same time, the study does
not consider the behavior of the system in nonlinear coordinates, which limits the completeness of
the analysis.
      </p>
      <p>
        Articles [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref15 ref16 ref17">14–17</xref>
        ] develop mathematical models based on nonlinear systems of equations to
assess the impact of dynamic parameters, in particular network centrality indicators, distance, and
interaction between social network users, on the level of information security. These works
demonstrate the significant potential of nonlinear modeling for assessing security, but they do not
directly address computer systems as objects of study.
      </p>
      <p>
        Work [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] provides practical recommendations for protecting computers from hardware and
software failures and virus attacks, and also discusses means of diagnostics, detection of operating
system errors, recovery of lost data, and improvement of operational reliability. A similar example
is given in study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], which focuses on detecting and countering hacking techniques, methods of
protection against malicious software, combating Internet fraud and spam, and ensuring parental
control of access to unwanted resources.
      </p>
      <p>
        Further analysis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11 ref7 ref8 ref9">7–11</xref>
        ] indicates the existence of a significant body of practice-oriented work
investigating the reliability and security of personal computers. In particular, [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] presents
recommendations for preventing technical failures, ranging from software installation errors to
local network construction problems. The study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] emphasizes the growing role of the computer
as a universal tool for work, study, leisure, and creativity, while drawing attention to the
multifactorial nature of the hardware selection process. Article [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ] provides a detailed overview of
measures to counter viruses, spyware, and fraudulent practices, as well as methods for ensuring
data confidentiality.
The work [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] consistently highlights the evolution of approaches—from the basic concepts of
“computer virus” and “software protection” to specific methods of countering information
destruction. Work [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] focuses on the most common technical malfunctions, methods of their
elimination, and data recovery. At the same time, these studies lack a systematic analysis of the
computer as a dynamic nonlinear system, which reduces the possibility of quantitatively assessing
its level of protection. Article [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ] discusses the specifics of managing shared computers in
educational laboratories, with a particular focus on advanced access control mechanisms in the
Microsoft Windows SteadyState operating system.
      </p>
      <p>
        The study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
        ] emphasizes the need for strict validation of access policies through formal
checks, penetration testing, and analysis of the adequacy of diagnostic information in wireless
sensor networks. At the same time, the “classic” parameters of network protection have been
studied, but specific aspects of interaction between system elements remain insufficiently
researched.
      </p>
      <p>
        The practical effectiveness of antivirus solutions is assessed in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
        ], where laboratory tests and
real-world examples establish the advantages of Bitdefender Antivirus Plus and Norton AntiVirus
Plus, recognized as the “editor’s choice.” At the same time, the authors note that the market is not
limited to these products.
      </p>
      <p>
        Article [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
        ] presents a broader approach to security policy analysis based on process algebra
(Communicating Sequential Processes), bi-modeling, and generalization of formal methods for
modeling non-interference policies.
      </p>
      <p>
        The growth in cyber threats has necessitated mathematical modeling of the behavior of
malicious objects, as emphasized in article [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
        ]. The proposed stochastic model for designing a
cyber defense system is based on probability theory methods and a system of differential equations
for describing attacks. The study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>
        ] considers another direction—the construction of a data
encryption system based on nonlinear differential equations with partial derivatives. An
architecture using the DES algorithm and “onion” encryption of databases is proposed, which
provided a 25% increase in the level of protection compared to traditional solutions.
      </p>
      <p>
        In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>
        ], the authors proposed a model predictive control (MPC) model for nonlinear
cyberphysical systems, taking into account deception attacks and constraints on executive mechanisms.
The model guarantees the root mean square stability of the system and demonstrates effectiveness
in counteracting destabilizing factors. This study is similar to the proposed approach, as it also
analyzes the dynamics of systems with nonlinear parameters, but the emphasis is on CPS control
rather than on a single computer.
      </p>
      <p>
        In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ], a multi-level model of situational awareness was created using machine learning
methods (Random Forest), which allows nonlinear patterns in network security to be taken into
account. Although the model is more focused on big data analytics, the approach confirms the
relevance of integrating nonlinear methods into cybersecurity assessment tasks.
      </p>
      <p>Article [26] creates a model for assessing cyber threats in microcontrollers, which takes into
account various factors of information influence and optimizes threat parameters. This approach is
relevant because it expands the application of mathematical models to internal hardware
components, which is related to your topic (hardware failures and malfunctions).</p>
      <p>
        The work [27–31] proposes a security model for socio-cyber-physical systems that takes into
account not only technical but also social factors, including the influence of social engineering. The
mathematical basis is based on a modification of the Lotka–Volterra equations. This confirms the
trend toward using nonlinear system models to describe security in conditions of complex
interrelationships. The study in [28] presents a systematic review of modern ML/DL methods for
ensuring security in cloud environments. It emphasizes the importance of adaptive protection
systems capable of operating in dynamic environments, which has parallels with the approach of
modeling computer resilience as a nonlinear system.
Current research confirms that nonlinear mathematical models and machine learning methods are
the dominant approaches to assessing cybersecurity. Summarizing the results of the analysis of
literary sources [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11 ref12 ref13 ref14 ref15 ref16 ref17 ref18 ref19 ref20 ref21 ref22 ref23 ref24 ref25 ref5 ref6 ref7 ref8 ref9">5–28</xref>
        ], we can conclude that there is significant scientific and practical work in the
field of information security and computer system functioning. At the same time, existing studies
mostly focus on individual aspects—antivirus protection, technical reliability, access control, or
cryptographic methods. However, there are no studies in which a computer is considered as an
integral dynamic nonlinear system with complex interrelationships between parameters, which
significantly limits the possibilities for developing universal quantitative models for assessing the
level of information security.
      </p>
      <p>The analysis of existing studies highlights both the achievements and the limitations of current
approaches in assessing computer security. While practice-oriented works provide valuable
recommendations for addressing software failures, malware protection, and access control, and
mathematical models demonstrate the potential of nonlinear and stochastic methods, the literature
still lacks an integrated approach that considers the computer as a dynamic nonlinear system with
interdependent parameters. This gap defines the direction of the present research.</p>
      <p>The aim of this work is to develop a methodology for assessing the level of security of computer
systems, taking into account both external and internal influencing factors. To achieve this aim, it
is necessary to: model a nonlinear system of computer protection; investigate its stability under
conditions of both absence and presence of destabilizing factors.</p>
      <p>In this study, the apparatus of nonlinear differential equations, fuzzy cognitive modeling, and
fuzzy set theory was applied to describe weakly formalized processes of information security. The
mathematical models were implemented in MATLAB and Multisim environments, which enabled
the construction of block diagrams of the protection system, the simulation of external attacks, and
the evaluation of the dynamic behavior of the system.</p>
      <p>This methodological framework provides the foundation for the subsequent sections, where the
proposed models are analyzed in detail, and their effectiveness in capturing the dynamics of
computer security is evaluated.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Modeling of nonlinear protection system</title>
      <p>The suggested model considers the impact of the following factors: data integrity control, access
control, firewall operation, antivirus protection, auditing, backup, as well as factors related to
software and hardware failures.</p>
      <p>The system of nonlinear differential equations, which allows us to determine dynamics of the
protection indicator depending on the parameters, has been obtained. Analytical solutions and
numerical modeling demonstrated that even under weak nonlinearity it is possible to evaluate
quantitative characteristics of the influence. Let’s imagine a linear model of the computer.</p>
      <p>
        A dynamic system is considered to be specified if the coordinates defining its state and the
operator describing the evolution of the initial state over time are given. The mathematical
representation of such systems can be implemented in the form of discrete models, systems of
differential equations, partial differential equations, integral and integro-differential equations,
systems with impulse effects, hybrid systems, or Markov processes. To describe the level of
computer security, let us consider a linear model [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]:
{ dt
dl = Z ( Z p + Q + W + F + V + Z Pl + Z k )+( C v+ C k ) I
dZ
      </p>
      <p>= I d Ac ( R + Ad )− (C d 2 + C d 1) I
dt
(1)
where Z p—coefficient reflecting the impact of additional information protection measures (e.g.,
combating electromagnetic interference, physical protection, etc.); Q—coefficient reflecting data
integrity and authenticity control (value 0…1); W—coefficient reflecting the separation of access to
information (value 0…1); F—coefficient reflecting the operation of a firewall (packet filter)—used to
control incoming and outgoing traffic (value 0…1); V—coefficient reflecting antivirus software
(value 0…1) Z p 1—coefficient reflecting software component failures and malfunctions (value 0 or
1); Z k—coefficient reflecting hardware component failures and malfunctions (value 0 or 1) C v —
coefficient reflecting the impact of personal data leakage speed; C k—coefficient reflecting the
impact of the amount of personal data on its leakage; I d—coefficient reflecting user identification
(value 0 or 1); A—coefficient reflecting user authentication (value 0 or 1); R—coefficient reflecting
data backup (value 0…1); Ad—coefficient reflecting auditing (used for monitoring, logging) (value
0…1);. C d 1—coefficient reflecting the impact of security on information leakage. C d 2—coefficient
reflecting the impact of system size on security.</p>
      <p>Since the linear model does not take into account the actual relationships between parameters,
the system (1) is supplemented with nonlinear components: (2):
{ dt
dI
− Z ( Z p + Q + W + F + V + Z p 1+ Z k )+(C v+ C k ) I + L2 I 2 + L3 I 3+ …
dZ
dt</p>
      <p>= I d Ac ( R + Ad )− (C d 2 + C d 1) I + K 2 Z 2 + K 3 Z 3 …
where L2, L3, etc. K2, K3, etc. are some linear operators.</p>
      <p>We consider the nonlinearity of the system to be weak, which allowed us to find solutions for
each equation of system (2) using the method of successive approximation, setting:
I = I 1+ I 2 + I 3+ … , dI = 0 ;
Z = Z 1+ Z 2 + Z 3+ … , dI = 0 ;
(2)
(3)
(4)
dI = 0 , dI = 0 and dZ = 0 , dZ = 0 ,
dt dt</p>
      <p>I = I 0 sinωt , Z = Z 0 sinωt .</p>
      <p>The following system of equations was obtained (3):
− Z ( Z p + Q + W + F + V + Z p 1+ Z k )+(C v+ C k ) I − L2 ( I 02 sin2 ωt )− L3 ( I 03 sin3 ωt )− …
= I d Ac ( R + Ad )− (C d 2 + C d 1) I + K 2 (Z 02 sin2 ωt )− K 3 (Z 30 sin3 ωt )− …
The system of equations is presented in the following form (4) (Figure 1):
{ dt k= 2
dI ∞</p>
      <p>= αZ + β 1 I − ∑ L k I 0k sin k ω t ,
dZ ∞</p>
      <p>= β 2 I − ∑ K k Z 0k sin k ω t ,
dt k= 2
{ dt
dI
dZ
dt
where
α= Z p + Q + W + F + V + Z p 1+ Z k , β 1= C v+ C k ,</p>
      <p>β 2= I d ( R + Ad )− (C d 2 + C d 1).</p>
      <p>Figure 1 illustrates the results of numerical modeling of the proposed nonlinear protection
system under different parameter configurations. To provide a more detailed interpretation, the
figure is divided into several subplots (a–f), each highlighting specific aspects of the system’s
dynamics.
Figure 1 (a-f): Dependencies of the protection indicator on the components of model (4)</p>
      <p>The results illustrated in Figure 1 confirm that the proposed nonlinear differential model
adequately reflects the resilience of the computer protection system. In all considered cases,
including scenarios with destabilizing factors and varying degrees of nonlinearity, the system
eventually converges to a stable state. This demonstrates the robustness of the methodology and its
suitability for quantitative evaluation of computer security under different operating conditions.</p>
      <p>Further transformations using the elimination method led to the following system:
dI = 1 ( d 2 Z + 1 ∑∞ (k K k Z 0k sink− 1 ω t cos ω t ))
dt β 2 d t2 ω k= 2
(5)
All found expressions (5) are substituted into the first equation of system (4):
dI = 1 ( d 2 Z + 1 ∑∞ (k K k Z 0k sink− 1 ω t cos ω t )).</p>
      <p>dt β 2 d t2 ω k= 2
or:
dd2tZ2 − β 1 ddZt − α β 2 Z =</p>
      <p>The characteristic equation took the form: λ2− β 1 λ− α β 2= 0. Provided that the discriminant is
positive:</p>
      <p>N (t )=
− 1 ∞</p>
      <p>∑ (k K k Z 0k sink− 1 ωtcosωt )+
ω k= 2
∞ ∞
+ β 1 ∑ ( K k Z 0k sink ωt )− β 2 ∑ ( L k I 0k sink ωt )</p>
      <p>k= 2 k= 2</p>
      <p>The final dependence of the protection indicator takes into account the influence of the main
system parameters (Figure 2).</p>
      <p>D = β 12 + 4 α β 2 &gt; 0 ⇒ λ1,2=
where</p>
      <p>Z одн ( t )= c 1 ( t ) e
where c '1 ( t ) , c '2 ( t ) found from the system:
The solution to a homogeneous equation is defined as:
β1+√β12+4 α β2 t
2
β1− √β12+4 α β2 t</p>
      <p>2</p>
      <p>Z одн ( t )= c 1 e + c 2 e .</p>
      <p>Stable oscillatory trajectories were obtained. The general solution of the inhomogeneous
equation was found by the method of variation of arbitrary constants:
β1+√β12+4 α β2 t β1− √β12+4 α β2 t
2 2
+ c 2 ( t ) e
.</p>
      <p>β + √β 12 + 4 α β 2
c '1 ( t ) 1
2</p>
      <p>e
c '1 ( t ) e
β1+√β12+4 α β2 t</p>
      <p>2
β1+√β12+4 α β2 t
2
+ c '2 ( t ) e
β1− √β12+4 α β2 t
2</p>
      <p>= 0 ,
β − √β 12 + 4 α β 2
+ c '2 ( t ) 1
2
e
β1− √β12+4 α β2 t
2
= N ( t ) ,
t
Z ( s )= ∫ ( N ( s )− e</p>
      <p>t0
t
–∫ ( N ( s )− e
t0
− β1− √β12+4 α β2 s e</p>
      <p>2
− β1− √β12+4 α β2 s e
2
β1+√β12+4 α β2 s</p>
      <p>2
√β 12 + 4 α β 2
β1− √β12+4 α β2 s</p>
      <p>2
√s β 12 + 4 α β 2</p>
      <p>) ds–
) d s
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)</p>
      <p>A system of nonlinear differential equations was obtained, which allows determining the
dynamics of the protection indicator depending on the parameters. Analytical solutions and
numerical modeling showed the stability of the system even with weak nonlinearity.
3.1. Investigation of the stability of the protection system in a computer
To assess stability, the analysis of the differential of the protection function was used (Figure 3).</p>
      <p>Since the conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the Cauchy problem are
satisfied, the trajectory of the system is the projection of the integral curve onto the phase space.
The intersection of two different trajectories is impossible, which confirms the stability of the
solutions.</p>
      <p>The initial differential equation of the system:
dd2tZ2 − β 1 ddZt − α β 2 Z =
The stability of the CM protection system in the presence of influences on it has been investigated.</p>
      <p>
        The behavior of CM resembles the behavior of a biological object. Assumption: the amplitude of
influences is nonlinear in time. Therefore, the following considerations are acceptable. A system
was considered in which the impact of harmful objects on the system and the immune response of
the system were modeled. It was assumed that the dynamics of the harmful object correspond to
the logistic model. The growth of a harmful infection depends on its initial status, the decline
caused by the immune response, and its own density effect, while the change in the immune
response depends on its initial status, natural decline, stimulation leading to an enhanced response,
and damage caused by the harmful object. Finally, the relative characteristic of the damaged organ
depends on the density of the harmful object and its natural degeneration. Then the dynamics of
the system is represented by differential equations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">24</xref>
        ]:
{ dt
d P = β P − γIP − β 0 P 2
dI = μ − αI + b I P − ηγIP
dt
,
(14)
where: P(t)—density of harmful objects, I(t)—immune status of the system, β—growth rate
coefficient of the harmful object, γ—decay rate coefficient of the harmful object due to its
interaction with the immune system of the network, and β0—coefficient of intraspecies interference
of harmful objects. μ—growth rate of the immune system, a—coefficient of its natural decay rate,
b —stimulating growth rate of the immune system due to its interaction with harmful objects, η—
coefficient of its decay rate due to interaction with a harmful object. α—coefficient of growth rate of
the damaged node due to a harmful object. This is nothing more than a system of equations of the
“predator-prey” type.
      </p>
      <p>The results of the program are shown in Figures 4–7.</p>
      <p>Phase portraits of the protection system are shown in Figure 7.
Phase portraits of the protection system are shown in Figure 8.</p>
      <p>The results demonstrate the system’s capability to maintain stability even in the presence of
destabilizing factors.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Discussion of the results of the study of the level of protection of the computer’s information space</title>
      <p>The proposed methodology allowed us to consider the computer protection system as a dynamic
nonlinear system, where the security level is described by a system of differential equations. Unlike
traditional approaches, which mostly focus on individual aspects (antivirus protection,
cryptographic algorithms, or access policies), the proposed model integrates the influence of key
factors, including authentication, auditing, firewall operation, backup, and software and hardware
failures. The results of analytical and numerical modeling showed that even under conditions of
weak nonlinearity, it is possible to obtain quantitative characteristics of the influence of factors on
the level of security. The constructed phase portraits confirmed the stability of the system in the
working range of parameters, as well as the absence of bifurcations, which indicates the stability of
the proposed approach.</p>
      <p>
        A comparison with existing works indicates the novelty of the results. In particular, studies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ]
considered stochastic attacks and predictive control for cyber-physical systems, but there is no
analysis of the influence of internal computer parameters on system stability. In [26], machine
learning methods were applied for situational awareness, but without mathematical formalization
of the interaction of factors in the form of differential equations. The proposed model allows
combining mathematical rigor with the practical possibility of assessing the impact of parameters
in real time, which confirms its potential for use in monitoring and adaptive protection control
systems.
      </p>
      <p>The obtained phase portraits confirm the stability of the system and the absence of bifurcations
in the working range of parameters (Figures 5, 7). This indicates the stability of the system.</p>
      <p>Overall, the proposed methodology not only demonstrates the feasibility of representing
computer protection as a dynamic nonlinear system but also opens avenues for extending this
approach. The integration of fuzzy cognitive modeling and probabilistic methods makes it possible
to incorporate stochastic and weakly formalized factors, including user behavior, social engineering
techniques, and random hardware or software failures. This provides a foundation for creating
hybrid models capable of adaptive decision-making in real time. Consequently, the presented
results can be viewed as a step toward developing universal frameworks for assessing and
improving the resilience of information security systems across both standalone computers and
complex network infrastructures.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>The study proposed and analyzed a methodology for assessing the level of computer security by
representing the system as a set of nonlinear differential equations. The developed model
integrates both external and internal factors of influence, including user authentication, auditing,
firewall operation, antivirus protection, software and hardware failures, and data leakage processes.
Numerical modeling carried out in MATLAB and Multisim demonstrated that the system maintains
stability within its operational range, even under destabilizing influences.</p>
      <p>The main findings of the study can be summarized as follows:
1. A system of nonlinear differential equations has been developed to assess the level of
computer security.
2. It has been established that the protection system remains stable even under conditions of
maximum external influences within the operating range of parameters.
3. The obtained graphical interpretations (phase portraits and dependencies of the protection
index on parameters) allow quantitative assessment of the influence of factors on the level
of security.
4. The proposed methodology can be used to monitor and improve the effectiveness of
information protection systems in personal computers and network environments.</p>
      <p>Unlike traditional approaches that address only isolated aspects of computer security, the
methodology presented in this work allows for a holistic evaluation of the computer as a dynamic
nonlinear system. This novelty ensures higher diagnostic accuracy and the possibility of
identifying critical parameters that most significantly affect the level of protection.</p>
      <p>The practical significance of the study lies in its potential application for real-time monitoring
of computer security, early detection of cyberattacks, and prediction of their consequences.
Moreover, the model can serve as a foundation for developing intelligent decision-support systems
in the field of information security.</p>
      <p>Future research should focus on extending the model to strongly nonlinear regimes,
incorporating hybrid types of threats such as combined DDoS and social engineering attacks, and
integrating the proposed methodology with machine learning algorithms to enable adaptive
security management.</p>
      <p>Declaration on Generative AI
While preparing this work, the authors used the AI programs Grammarly Pro to correct text
grammar and Strike Plagiarism to search for possible plagiarism. After using this tool, the authors
reviewed and edited the content as needed and took full responsibility for the publication’s content.
[26] R. Malinovskyi, D. Kupershtein, V. Lukichov, Mathematical Model for Assessing Cyber</p>
      <p>Threats and Information Impacts in Microcontrollers, Inf. Technol. Comput. Eng., 59(1) (2024).
[27] S. Milevsky, Socio-Cyberphysical Systems’ Security Models, Ukr. Inf. Secur. Res. J., 26(1)
(2024).
[28] Y. I. Alzoubi, A. Mishra, A. E. Topcu, Research Trends in Deep Learning and Machine Learning
for Cloud Computing Security: A Systematic Review, Artif. Intell. Rev., Springer, 2024.
[29] S. Kazmirchuk, et al., Improved Gentry’s Fully Homomorphic Encryption Scheme: Design,</p>
      <p>Implementation and Performance Evaluation, CybHyg (2019) 72–83.
[30] O. Yudin, Y. Ziatdinov, A. Voronin, A. Ilyenko, A Method for Determining Informative
Components on the basis of Construction of a Sequence of Decision Rules, Cybern. Syst. Anal.,
52(2) (2016) 323–329.
[31] A. Ilyenko, S. Ilyenko, Program Module of Cryptographic Protection Critically Important
Information of Civil Aviation Channels, in: Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Eng. Educ. Appl. 2022, 235–
247.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Rzaieva</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <source>Methods of Modeling Database System Security, in: Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication System</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>3654</volume>
          ,
          <year>2024</year>
          ,
          <fpage>384</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>390</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Kostiuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <source>Effectiveness of Information Security Control using Audit Logs, in: Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication Systems</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>3991</volume>
          ,
          <year>2025</year>
          ,
          <fpage>524</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>538</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Vasylyshyn</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>A Model of Decoy System based on Dynamic Attributes for Cybercrime Investigation</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>East</surname>
          </string-name>
          .-Europ.
          <source>J. Enterp. Technol. 1</source>
          .
          <issue>9</issue>
          (
          <issue>121</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
          <fpage>6</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>20</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .15587/
          <fpage>1729</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>4061</lpage>
          .
          <year>2023</year>
          .273363
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Bilous</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Cyber Evidence Software as the Digital Forensics Tools in the Investigation of Cybercrime</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Workshop on Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication Systems</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>3991</volume>
          (
          <year>2025</year>
          )
          <fpage>26</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>37</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Ilyenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Ilyenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Herasymenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>A Biometric Asymmetric Cryptosystem Software Module Based on Convolutional Neural Networks, Int. J. Comput. Netw. Inf. Secur</source>
          .
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .5815/ijcnis.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>06</volume>
          .01
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Ilyenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Ilyenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I.</surname>
          </string-name>
           Kravchuk,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Herasymenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Prospective Directions of Traffic Analysis and Intrusion Detection based on Neural Networks, Electron. Prof. Sci. Edition</source>
          Cybersecur.
          <source>Educ. Sci. Tech</source>
          .
          <volume>1</volume>
          (
          <issue>17</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>46</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>56</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .28925/
          <fpage>2663</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>4023</lpage>
          .
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>17</volume>
          .4656
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Inayat</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
             F. 
            <surname>Zia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
             Mahmood, H. M. 
            <surname>Khalid</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Benbouzid</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Learning-based Methods for Cyber Attacks Detection in IoT Systems: A Survey on Methods, Analysis, and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Future</given-names>
            <surname>Prospects</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Electronics,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>1502</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname> Ahmetoglu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Das</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A Comprehensive</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Review on Detection of Cyber-Attacks: Data Sets</article-title>
          , Methods, Challenges, and Future Research Directions, Internet of Things,
          <volume>20</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>100615</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Ozalp</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Albayrak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Detecting Cyber Attacks with High-Frequency Features using Machine Learning Algorithms</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Acta Polytechnica Hungarica</source>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Oyetoro</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Mart</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>U. Amah,</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Using Machine Learning Techniques Random Forest and Neural Network to Detect Cyber Attacks</article-title>
          ,
          <source>ScienceOpen Preprints</source>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kumar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Saxena</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Choi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Machine Learning Algorithm for Detection of False Data Injection Attack in Power System</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proc. 2021 Int. Conf. Inf. Netw. (ICOIN)</source>
          , IEEE,
          <year>2021</year>
          ,
          <fpage>385</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>390</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Mahboub</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. S. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ahmed</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Saeed</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smart</surname>
            <given-names>IDS</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <article-title>IPS for Cyber-Physical Systems</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Artificial Intelligence Paradigms for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          ,
          <fpage>109</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>136</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Petriv</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I.</surname>
          </string-name>
           Opirskyy,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Mazur</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Modern Technologies of Decentralized Databases, Authentication, and
          <article-title>Authorization Methods, in: Cybersecurity Providing in Information and Telecommunication Systems II</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>3826</volume>
          ,
          <year>2024</year>
          ,
          <fpage>60</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>71</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Jaber</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>S.</surname>
          </string-name>
           Anwar,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N. Z. B.</given-names>
            <surname>Khidzir</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
           
          <article-title>Anbar, The Importance of IDS and IPS in Cloud Computing Environment: Intensive Review and Future Directions</article-title>
          , in: Advances in Cyber Security: Second International Conference (ACeS
          <year>2020</year>
          ),
          <year>2020</year>
          ,
          <fpage>479</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>491</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Aldweesh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Derhab</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A.</surname>
          </string-name>
           
          <string-name>
            <surname>Z.</surname>
          </string-name>
           
          <article-title>Emam, Deep Learning Approaches for Anomaly-based Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey, Taxonomy, and Open Issues, Knowledge-based Systems</article-title>
          , 
          <volume>189</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>105124</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Sohi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Seifert</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>F.</surname>
          </string-name>
           
          <article-title>Ganji, RNNIDS: Enhancing Network Intrusion Detection Systems through Deep Learning, Comput</article-title>
          . Secur. 
          <volume>102</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>102151</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>R.</surname>
          </string-name>
           Achary,
          <article-title>Cryptography and Network Security: An Introduction</article-title>
          .
          <source>Mercury Learning and Information</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Dwivedi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Bhushan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Singh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Snehlata,</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Detection of Malicious Network Traffic Attacks using Support Vector Machine</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Int. Conf. Adv. Netw. Technol. Intell. Comput.</source>
          , Springer, Cham,
          <year>2023</year>
          ,
          <fpage>54</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>68</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Reddy</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Katkam</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. R. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Rao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Cyber Attacks Detection using Machine Learning</article-title>
          , NeuroQuantology,
          <volume>20</volume>
          (
          <issue>19</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
          <fpage>4388</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Semwal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Handa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Cyber-Attack Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems using Supervised Machine Learning</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Handbook of Big Data Analytics and Forensics</source>
          ,
          <year>2022</year>
          ,
          <fpage>131</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>140</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Gu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A novel approach to intrusion detection using SVM ensemble with feature augmentation, Comput</article-title>
          . Secur.,
          <volume>86</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>53</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>62</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Nazir</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Khan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A novel combinatorial optimization based feature selection method for network intrusion detection, Comput</article-title>
          . Secur.,
          <volume>102</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>102164</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          [23]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>He</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Chan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Intrusion Detection Methods based on Integrated Deep Learning Model, Comput. Secur.</source>
          ,
          <volume>103</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <fpage>102177</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          [24]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Wu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>Robust Security-based Model Predictive Control for Nonlinear CyberPhysical Systems under Random Deception Attacks</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Actuator</given-names>
            <surname>Saturation</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control</source>
          , Wiley,
          <year>2024</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          [25]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>He</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Su</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Establishment of Nonlinear Network Security Situational Awareness Model based on Random Forest under the Background of Big Data, Nonlinear Eng</article-title>
          .,
          <string-name>
            <surname>De</surname>
            <given-names>Gruyter</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2023</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>