<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>S. Vladov);</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>assess the compressor turbine element's degradation⋆</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Serhii</string-name>
          <email>serhii.vladov@univd.edu.ua</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vysotska</string-name>
          <email>victoria.a.vysotska@lpnu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Pysmenna</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andrii</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nataliia Vladova</string-name>
          <email>nataliia.vladova@sfa.org.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Volodymyr Mazharov</string-name>
          <email>mazharov_volodymyr@sfa.org.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nadiia Kovalenko</string-name>
          <email>nadinkovalenko508@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Artem Zelenskyi</string-name>
          <email>zelenskyi.artem7@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Łukasz Ścisło</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Cracow University of Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Warszawska 24, 31-155 Craków</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="PL">Poland</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>L. Landau Avenue 27, 61080 Kharkiv</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Ukrainian State Flight Academy</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Chobanu Stepana Street 1, 25005 Kropyvnytskyi</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>000</volume>
      <fpage>0</fpage>
      <lpage>0001</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper develops and verifies a streaming method for continuously clustering the helicopter turboshaft engine's gas temperature in front of the compressor turbine short-term fluctuations to assess the initial stages of the first-stage turbine blade degradation connected to the compressor. The developed method includes a signal quality control and imputation module, adaptive baseline detrending, local robust normalization, multifunctional feature extraction in sliding windows, online dimensionality reduction, and incremental clustering with exponential “forgetting” and dynamic component lifecycle management. An expert-calibrated “cluster → physical degradation signature” map and an aggregated scalar metric based on the assignments' sliding fraction to a defective cluster are introduced for prompt alerting. The method assesses the first-stage turbine blades' degradations' initial stages connected to the compressor. The developed method was validated using TV3-117 engine flight data (1280 samples at 4 Hz) and simulated scenarios (drift, transient spikes, increased noise, flatline, and regime change). Based on the experimental results, a reproducible “defective” cluster signature was identified (increased window average and increased short-term variability). The defective assignments' sliding fraction consistently exceeded the 0.20 empirical threshold in the degradation models, ensuring early and interpretable warnings with a controlled false alarm rate.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Continuous clustering</kwd>
        <kwd>short-term temperature fluctuations</kwd>
        <kwd>gas temperature in front of the compressor turbine</kwd>
        <kwd>TV3-117 turboshaft engine</kwd>
        <kwd>first-stage turbine blade defect</kwd>
        <kwd>streaming data processing</kwd>
        <kwd>time series analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>online diagnostics</kwd>
        <kwd>predictive maintenance</kwd>
        <kwd>anomaly detection</kwd>
        <kwd>1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>It is known that helicopter turboshaft engines (TE) place high demands on the reliability and
accuracy of operating parameter monitoring, since the compressor and compressor turbine
component degradation directly affect thrust, fuel efficiency, and flight safety [1–3]. One of the
most informative indicators of engine condition is the gas temperature in front of the compressor
turbine, since its dynamics reflect changes in combustion modes, the blade’s aerodynamic
efficiency loss, and the possible formation of localized overheating [4–6]. Modern onboard sensors
record the temperature value every 2 seconds (sampling frequency of 0.5 Hz), which provides
sufficient resolution to capture short-term fluctuations accompanying the degradations’ initial
stages but simultaneously creates a non-stationary and noisy time series large enough to require
special analysis methods [7, 8].</p>
      <p>Traditional diagnostic approaches, such as [9, 10], often rely on thresholds, averaged values, or
periodic inspections, which hinders the early detection of slowly progressing defects and
lowamplitude anomalies manifested as short-term spikes or variable patterns. A flight mode instability,
the external conditions' influence, and the annotated data's lack of real failures make the task
particularly challenging. Methods with rigid model binding are either too sensitive to noise or lose
information content with frequent mode changes [11, 12]. In such conditions, a continuous,
onlineoriented algorithm capable of identifying repetitive and rare patterns in streaming two-second data
appears to be a promising tool for increasing diagnostic sensitivity.</p>
      <p>Based on the above, a method for continuous clustering of helicopter TE’s short-term gas
temperature fluctuations in front of the compressor turbine development is aimed at generating
robust, adaptive feature representations and cluster evolution metrics that link pattern distribution
changes to the compressor and turbine components’ physical degradation. The proposed approach
ensures early detection of deviations without the need for extensive tagging, increases resilience to
noise and temporal non-stationarity, and enables a transition from reactive to predictive
maintenance. Furthermore, it is noted that the research practical significance lies in the potential
reduction in operating costs and improved flight safety through the timely identification of the
compressor turbine blade degradation’s’ initial stages, thereby optimizing maintenance intervals.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related Works</title>
      <p>The importance of monitoring the gas temperature in front of the compressor turbine for
helicopter TE diagnostics has long been recognized, since its dynamics closely correlate with
changes in the gas-air tract (compressor performance, combustion efficiency, local overheating)
and it is often used as a key engine parameter [13]. This is the basis for both classical approaches to
detecting degradation (EGT margin, basic predictive models) [14–17] and modern data-driven
solutions [18–20].</p>
      <p>Currently, there are three main areas of diagnostic approaches, which include thermodynamic
methods, such as [21, 22], and threshold algorithms, such as [23, 24], and statistical and machine
learning models used to construct a gas temperature values “baseline” and detect deviations.
Among them, popular ones are regression methods [25, 26], autoencoders [27, 28], decision trees
[29, 30], and boosting methods [31, 32], as well as complex digital twins [33] and deep neural
network architectures, including LSTM [34, 35], Transformer models [36, 37], and hybrid solutions,
such as [38–40], used to predict degradation and estimate the remaining service life. Recent studies
demonstrate the significant potential of digital twins and deep neural networks for accurately
modeling degradation processes. At the same time, these methods place increased demands on the
correct normalization of data and accounting for changes in operating modes.</p>
      <p>One of the main challenges is the temporal variability of operating conditions (flight mode
changes, load changes, external conditions) and the low-amplitude presence, short-term bursts in
gas temperature, which traditional averaging methods and threshold detectors either ignore or
mistake for noise. Recent studies, such as [41–43], highlight the need for methods that are robust to
time-varying conditions. For example, spectral equalization normalization and self-tuning
preprocessing improve the neural networks training under changing conditions, but do not fully
solve the problem of identifying short, repeating patterns in data streams.</p>
      <p>It is noted that in recent years, studies have appeared that use cluster analysis [44] and matrix
profile-based methods [45] to detect anomalies and recurring patterns in time series (including
cluster-aware modifications). These approaches are good for detecting typical patterns and local
anomalies without explicit labeling; however, most implementations are designed for batch
processing or focused on relatively long signal fragments (vibrations, power), rather than
streaming (online) processing of gas temperatures’ high-frequency short bursts with a 0.5 Hz
frequency. Furthermore, cluster-oriented matrix profile solutions rarely directly link cluster
evolution to the physical degradation of the helicopter TE compressor turbine blade.</p>
      <p>Some recent studies, such as [46], propose adaptive neural network and hybrid methods for
local problems (signal reconstruction, adaptive predictive filtering), but empirical studies focusing
specifically on continuous clustering of two-second gas temperature flows and their interpretation
in helicopter TE compressor turbine blade degradation terms bremain insufficient. Furthermore,
measurement reliability issues (dual thermocouples, data gaps, signal reconstruction) under
helicopter flight conditions complicate the application of purely algorithmic solutions.</p>
      <p>Thus, based on the above, a number of key unresolved issues have emerged, justifying the need
to develop a method for continuous clustering of gas temperature short-term fluctuations in
helicopter TE. Key among these is the need for reliable detection and stable extraction of
lowamplitude, short-term patterns amid significant fluctuations in operating conditions. Furthermore,
existing studies lack mechanisms for online adaptation to operating mode changes without
requiring full retrainability of models. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider the onboard
platform’s computational limitations, including limited resources and latency requirements, which
dictate the requirements for the solution’s computational efficiency. Finally, with a limited number
of labeled failure examples, semi- and unsupervised validation approaches are needed to assess the
cluster shift's significance for substantiating technical maintenance decisions.</p>
      <p>Therefore, each of these issues cannot be addressed using existing batch, supervised, or “basic”
clustering approaches without specially developed online clustering mechanisms, adaptive
normalization, a cluster evolution tracking mechanism, and procedures for linking cluster changes
to physical degradation models. Therefore, developing a continuous clustering method focused on
helicopter TE two-second temperature flows for assessing compressor turbine blade degradation is
a pressing scientific and practical challenge.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Materials and Methods</title>
      <p>The proposed method for continuous clustering of helicopter TE short-term temperature
fluctuations in front of the compressor turbine is formalized as a dataflow algorithm that accepts as
input a scalar time series of measurements xn = x(tn), where tn = t0 + 2 · n with a sampling step of
Δt = 2 seconds. A window of m samples (window time Tw = 2 · m seconds) and a sliding step s (in
samples) are introduced. Data flow processing is defined by the operationSn = {xn – m + 1, …, xn}.
Primary preprocessing is reduced to baseline reconstruction and slow-time component
suppression, within which the baseline is estimated by an exponential moving average
bn=α ⋅xn+(1−α )⋅bn−1
and subtract it, obtaining the detrended signal ~xn=xn−bn . To ensure robustness to outliers,
robust normalization based on the median and MAD is used [47, 48]:
medn=median ( Sn) ,</p>
      <p>MADn=median (|x – medn|) , zn=
xn−medn
MADn+ϵ
.</p>
      <p>
        (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        )
      </p>
      <p>
        When data is missing, local imputation is applied, which is a linear interpolation or a model
regressor. When detecting “sticking” or artifacts, a zero-variance check is introduced for the
window. That is, if Var(Sn) &lt; δ, the signal is flagged as suspected sensor failure and reconstructed
by approximating the previous adequate windows. Each window Sn is mapped into a feature space
ℝd with a feature set combining statistics, differential, and spectral characteristics. A typical feature
vector is represented as:
ϕ ( Sn)=[ μn , σ 2n , γ n , κn , max ( Sn) , min ( Sn) , ,
d xn d2 x
dt d t 2
n , cvsf ],
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        )
r j ,t= K
π j ,t−1 ∙ N ( ϕt|μ j ,t−1 , Σ j ,t−1)
      </p>
      <p>
        .
∑ π k ,t−1 ∙ N ( ϕt|μk ,t−1 , Σk ,t−1)
k=1
The parameter update is performed with exponential forgetting λ ∈ (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">0, 1</xref>
        ) as:
      </p>
      <p>N j ,t= λ ∙ N j ,t−1+r j ,t , μ j ,t=
λ ∙ N j ,t−1 ∙ μ j ,t−1+r j ,t ∙ ϕt ,</p>
      <p>N j ,t
Σ j ,t=</p>
      <p>⊤
λ ∙ N j ,t−1 ∙ Σ j ,t−1+r j ,t ∙ ( ϕt− μ j ,t ) ∙ ( ϕt− μ j ,t )
+ ε ∙ I .</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>A priori weights are normalized as:</title>
        <p>N j ,t
π j ,t=</p>
        <p>N j ,t .
where
μn= m1 ∙ i∑=m1 xn−m+i , σ2n</p>
        <p>is the dispersion, γn, κn are the asymmetry and excess
coefficients, ddxtn and dd2tx2n
average values, cvsf is the continuous wavelet transform scale coefficients vector.</p>
        <p>
          The cluster core is implemented as an incremental mixture of K components with parameters .
For assignment and updating, a stochastic gradient is used to maximize the Gaussian mixtures’
partial likelihood [49]. At the feature input step ϕt, prior weights and responsibilities are calculated
as:
are the gas temperature first and second derivatives over time
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          )
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          )
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          )
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          )
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          )
(9)
(11)
(12)
∑ N k ,t
        </p>
        <p>k</p>
        <p>The proposed mechanism ensures adaptation to the feature distribution’s evolution and the old
pattern’s forgetting. For non-degenerate distributions and automatic addition (or removal), the
component is supplemented with procedures for creating new clusters under low density
conditions:
max N ( ϕt|μ j ,t−1 , Σ j ,t )&lt; τ new .</p>
        <p>j
A new component is created with initial parameters</p>
        <p>μnew=ϕt , Σnew=σ 2n ∙ I , N new= N 0 ,
d j ( ϕt )&lt; √( ϕt− μ j ,t )⊤ ∙ Σ −j,1t ∙ ( ϕt− μ j ,t ) .</p>
        <p>weak components are removed when Nj,t &lt; τdel. To reduce the sensitivity to the distribution’s
shape, it is permissible to use the density distance based on the Mahalanobis distance [50]:</p>
        <p>The anomalousness and associated degradation score are formulated as a hybrid score that takes
into account the distance from the nearest cluster, local density, and the change in cluster
occupancy rates over time. The anomalous score is defined as:</p>
        <p>A ( ϕt )=min (d j ( ϕt )) ∙ exp (− β ∙ log ( π j ,t + ε )) , (10)</p>
        <p>j
where β &gt; 0 scales the density contribution. To aggregate trends, a cluster share aggregation
window is introduced
or, in discrete form,</p>
        <p>P j ( τ )=
1 t</p>
        <p>∙ ∫ l {assign ( ϕs)= j }ds ,</p>
        <p>T t−τ
P j ,t=
1 ∙ ∑t l {arg max (rk ,i)= j }.</p>
        <p>W i=t−W +1 k</p>
        <p>In the cluster evolution metric D (drift), the divergence between distributions in two adjacent
intervals is used:</p>
        <p>D (t1 , t 2)= KL( pΘ(t1)‖pΘ(t2) )= ∑j=K1 π j ,t1 ∙ log( ππ jj ,,tt21 )+ 12 ×
× ∑ (tr ( Σ −j,1t2 ∙ Σ j ,t1)+( μ j ,t2−μ j ,t1)⊤ ∙ Σ −j,1t2 ∙ ( μ j ,t2−μ j ,t1)−d ) . (13)
j</p>
        <p>Degradation measurement is formalized through an expertly calibrated map of clusters and
physical condition. This is accomplished by introducing a “degradation signature” vector ψj for the
j-th cluster, defined by statistical features (e.g., highμ value, increased σ value, spectral energy shift
to the high-frequency range), and an aggregated degradation assessment</p>
        <p>K
G (t )=∑ ω j ∙ ∆ P j (t ) ∙ ⟨ ψ j , 1⟩+ γ ∙ ∆ μh ot (t ) , (14)</p>
        <p>j=1
where ΔPj(t) = Pj,t − Pj,t-τ, ωj are the weights determined by calibration (regression or Bayesian
approximation) and Δμhot is the change in the mean in “hot” clusters. In the reference degradation
labels presence, it is possible to estimate the regression model
s (t )≈β τ⋅Φ (T ) , β =arg min ∑ l ( s (t ) , β⊤ ∙ Φ (t ))+ λ ∙‖β‖22 , (15)
β t
where Φ(t) is the aggregated cluster features set, and ℓ is the loss function (e.g., quadratic). It is
noted that the method is robust to noise due to several design features:
1. Robust normalization and detrending eliminate low-frequency noise.
2. Including scaling coefficients and wavelet energies in the feature space facilitates the
shortterm spikes separation from background fluctuations.
3. Exponential forgetting λ allows the algorithm to adapt to long-term mode changes without
retraining.
4. The procedures for creating or removing components provide mode ”memory” and
automatic adjustment of the clusters’ number.</p>
        <p>To detect sensor failures, smoothness and autocorrelation statistics are additionally calculated
based on the condition that if ACF (Sn, 1) ≈ 1 and σ2n is close to zero, the window is marked as
suspicious and excluded from the contributions Pj,t until the signal quality is confirmed.</p>
        <p>The sensitivity and convergence analytical assessment is based on the fact that for a streaming
gas temperature signal with a fine step η, the parameter estimates satisfy a stochastic
approximation to the mixture maximum likelihood, assuming stationarity of the local interval. It is
also noted that the adaptation rate is determined by λ and the effective samples’ generalized size</p>
        <p>N eff = 1−1 λ . (16)</p>
        <p>The computational complexity estimate per incoming milestone is based on computing the
densities for all K components, which requires O(K · d2) for storing and inverting covariances (or
O(K · d) for diagonal approximation of Σj). Memory is then limited to O(K · d2). Practical
recommendations include choosing d ≪ m via feature selection or streaming PCA (online Oja [51]),
where the principal component update is given by Oja’s rule:
ωt+1=ωt +ηt ∙(ϕt−ωt ∙ (ω⊤t ∙ ϕt )) .
(17)</p>
        <p>The developed methods’ validation involves modeling the gas temperature values’ degradation
(with a linear or exponential shift of the mean and an increase in variance), injecting short-term
anomalies, and validating on historical flight data with expert labeling. Evaluation metrics include
detection (average detection delay ∆), precision and recall, ROC-AUC for A(ϕ) rates, and the cluster
structure (Silhouette, Adjusted Rand Index [52–54]) stability in the labeled intervals presence.</p>
        <p>Thus, based on the above, Table 1 presents an algorithm for continuous clustering of short-term
fluctuations in the helicopter TE gas temperature, including successive stages of streaming data
reception, quality control and signal recovery, adaptive detrending and robust normalization, a
window representation formation and a multifunctional feature extraction, online dimensionality
reduction, incremental clustering with cluster life cycle management, the anomaly scoring
calculation and the cluster structure evolution, as well as procedures for matching cluster
signatures with physical signs of degradation and regulating alerts for assessing the turbine and
compressor blades' condition.</p>
        <p>Cluster lifecycle
management</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Anomaly assessment and scoring</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Cluster evolution monitoring</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Physical signature matching</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>Decision rules and alerts</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-6">
        <title>Fault tolerance and resource management</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-7">
        <title>Adaptive calibration</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-8">
        <title>Validation and reporting</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-9">
        <title>Mechanisms for creating new clusters when new patterns appear and removing (aggregating) obsolete clusters.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-10">
        <title>Calculation of anomaly rates based on cluster distance, density, and population frequency changes.</title>
        <p>Tracking assignment
distributions, parameter drift, and
stability metrics over time.
alibration and maintenance of a
“cluster-physical degradation
signature” correspondence map
for interpretation.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-11">
        <title>Formalization of thresholds, aggregation rules, or learnable criteria for generating diagnostic alerts.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-12">
        <title>Sensor failure detection, computation redundancy, and load adaptation to onboard limitations.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-13">
        <title>Periodic or event-driven adjustments to map parameters and weights based on expert annotation.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-14">
        <title>Quality metrics collection</title>
        <p>(detection delay, precision, recall,
cluster stability) and report
generation for maintenance
regulation.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-15">
        <title>Dynamically changing number of clusters, model drift-resistant.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-16">
        <title>Anomaly rates for each window, input for alert rules.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-17">
        <title>Time series of cluster shares and drift metrics.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-18">
        <title>Correspondence map, interpretable degradation indicators.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-19">
        <title>Diagnostic and predictive alerts, indicators for TR.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-20">
        <title>Computational degradation modes, unreliable data flagging.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-21">
        <title>Updated calibration parameters, false positives (false negatives) reduction.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-22">
        <title>Reports and metrics sets for performance evaluation and operational decision-making.</title>
        <p>Thus, a streaming method for the short-term fluctuations’ continuous clustering in the
helicopter TE gas temperature in front of the compressor turbines with a 0.5 Hz sampling
frequency is proposed. This method includes robust preprocessing and detrending, multifunctional
feature extraction, online dimensionality reduction, and incremental clustering with cluster
lifecycle management for adaptation to operating mode transitions. The method provides a scalar
anomaly estimate and an aggregated degradation metric, coupled with an expertly calibrated
“cluster → physical signature” map, enabling early detection of turbine and compressor blade wear
signs under limited onboard computing resources.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Case study and discussions</title>
      <p>In this study, a numerical experiment was conducted using the developed method on the helicopter
TE thermal dynamics under nominal conditions. The gas temperature in front of the compressor
turbine TG(t), a real measurement series of the TV3-117 engine recorded by a standard onboard
sensor on a production Mi-8MTV helicopter (Figure 1), was used. The sensor is a set of 14 dual
chrome-alumel thermocouples of the T-102 type [55–57]. It is noted that the tests were carried out
at the 2500-meter altitude under standard atmospheric conditions (air temperature ≈ 268 K,
pressure ≈ 74 kPa). Signals were recorded at the Δt = 0.25 second interval (sampling frequency
4 Hz) for 320 seconds, which provided a 1280 readings sample.</p>
      <p>Gas temperature dynamics
1120
K
,
e
r
u
t
a
r
ep1115
m
e
T
s
a
G
11100</p>
      <p>It is noted that Figure 1 shows a TV3-117 engine’s gas temperatures in front of the compressor
turbine time series with a 4 Hz sampling rate over a 0 to 320 seconds’ range. The series’ average
temperature is approximately 1115 K, with measurements ranging from approximately 1090 to
1140 K. Against a weak low-frequency modulating trend background, a distinct high-frequency
component is present, consisting of short-term oscillations with a typical amplitude of
approximately 2 K and a characteristic period of approximately 5 seconds, manifested as regular
“high-frequency” bursts.</p>
      <p>A signal’s pre-processing was performed by the onboard controller, and a two-stage filter was
used to suppress interference. This filter included initial smoothing using the Savitzky-Golay
method with an 11-sample window and a third-order polynomial. Outliers were then removed
using a ±3σ criterion, with gaps restored using linear interpolation. Systematic error correction
took into account the thermocouples’ calibration characteristics (with an error of no more than 1.5
K) and a correction for flow velocities up to 20 m/s. Gas temperature values were also normalized
to a single scale using z-normalization:
z (T G)i=
2 ,
(18)
where T (i) is the i-th gas temperatures in front of the compressor turbine value recorded by</p>
      <p>Gmeas
the helicopter’s standard sensor. Based on the above, normalized gas temperatures in front of the
compressor turbine values hear were used to form the training dataset. This datasets’ fragment is
presented in Table 2.
...
...
...
...
...
...</p>
      <p>...
40,031
80,063
120,094
160,125
199,906
239,937
279,969
...
320
1114,32
1115,25
1115,12
1115,03
1114,79
1115,22
1115,77
1114,74
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...</p>
      <p>...
...
...
...
...
...</p>
      <p>...</p>
      <p>To assess the training datasets’ homogeneity, traditional metrics were used, including the
number of observations, the mathematical expectation x and standard deviation σ, the skewness
(SK) and kurtosis (KE) coefficients, the Shapiro-Wilk test (W and p-value) to check the
distributions’ normality, the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (Δyt) and KPSS stationarity tests, the
Ljung-Box Q(h) test to identify autocorrelation, the Durbin-Watson (DW) statistic to assess the
autocorrelation of residuals after detrending, the Levene test (W) to compare variances between
segments, as well as segmental analysis of means and variances over equal sampling intervals
[58–60]:
x= 1 ∙ ∑n xi , σ =√ 1 ∙ ∑n ( xi− x )2 , SK = 1 ∙ ∑n ( xi− x )3 , KE= 1 ∙ ∑n ( xi− x )4−3 ,
n i=1 n i=1 n i=1 σ n i=1 σ</p>
      <p>W =</p>
      <p>n 2
(∑ ai ∙ x(i))
i=1
n
∑ ( xi− x )2
i=1</p>
      <p>p
, ∆ yt=α + β ∙ t + γ ∙ yt−1+∑ δi ∙ ∆ yt−i+ εi ,
i=1</p>
      <p>(19)
n
KPSS= n12 ∙ ∑i=n1 σS^t22 , St= ∑i=t1 ε^i , DW = ∑t=2 ( et−et−1)2
, Q=n ∙ ( n+2) ∙ ∑h ^ρ2k ,</p>
      <p>k=1 n−k
k
∑ n j ∙ ( Z j •−Z j ••)2
W =( Nk −−1k )∙ j∑=k1 ∑nj ( Zij−Z j •)2 ,</p>
      <p>j=1 i=1
where x(i) are ordered values, and the coefficients ai depend on the expected values of the order
statistics of the normal distribution, test hypothesis H0: γ = 0 (a unit root presence); model
yt = rt + εt, where rt is a random walk, ^ρk is the estimated autocorrelation function,
Zi j=|X ij−~X j|; ~X j i s the median of the j-th group.</p>
      <p>Table 3 presents the training dataset’s homogeneity evaluation numerical results, which include
the sample size, the main moments of the distribution (mathematical expectation, standard
deviation, skewness, and kurtosis coefficients), the statistical tests results for normality,
stationarity, and autocorrelation (Shapiro–Wilk, ADF, KPSS, Ljung–Box, and Durbin–Watson), and
the test for variances equality (Levene) with the corresponding statistics and p-values.</p>
      <p>According to Table 3, the training set is characterized by a mean of approximately 1115,43
Kelvin and a relatively small population variance (σ ≈ 1,99 K). The skewness and kurtosis
coefficients are close to zero, indicating that the distribution is close to normal. However, formal
tests of normality yield conflicting results. The Shapiro-Wilk test rejects normality for the given
sample (low p-value), while the distributions’ moments are nearly symmetrical, which is a typical
effect of large data datasets, in which small deviations from normality become statistically
significant. Stationarity tests yield mixed results, according to which the ADF indicates a unit root
(stationarity) absence, while the KPSS detects a possible deviation from stationarity, indicating the
presence of a weak low-frequency trend or structural drift requiring detrending. The
Durbin-Watson statistic low value and the significant Ljung-Box test indicate a pronounced
autocorrelation in the series. At the same time, the Levene test does not reveal statistically
significant differences in variances between quartile segments, which confirms the relative
homogeneity of the variance component over time.</p>
      <p>In addition, Table 4 presents the dataset segmental analysis results across four equal intervals,
namely, each segment’s readings’ initial and final indices, the average gas temperature level
estimated values (Mean, K), and the corresponding variances (Var, K), which allow us to estimate
the series’ first and second moments’ temporal homogeneity.
1115,3</p>
      <p>Var, K
1,702
2,049
2,084
1,799</p>
      <p>Segment analysis (Table 4) shows that the estimated mean temperature levels in all four equal
intervals are close to each other (the means spread does not exceed ≈ 0,26 K), indicating a stable
baseline signal level and the absence of large-scale changes in operating modes in the observation
interval under consideration. Segment variances are also within a narrow range (≈ 1,70…2,08 K2),
while the observed minor increases in variability in the second and third segments indicate a local
increase in short-term fluctuations rather than a systematic change in noise or a level shift. Taken
together, these results confirm the time series’ first and second moments’ relative homogeneity,
simultaneously emphasizing the need to apply locally adaptive normalization procedures and
account for the variance of temporal variability when constructing stream clustering.</p>
      <p>A study was conducted on continuous clustering of short-term fluctuations in exhaust gas
temperature for a controlled scenarios set:</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>1. Nominal mode.</title>
        <p>2. Increased noise level.
3. Slow average level drift.
4. Transient spikes.
5. Sensor “flatline” artifacts.
6. Regime change.</p>
        <p>For each scenario, sliding window preprocessing, multifunctional feature extraction, streaming
clustering, and cluster share evolution analysis were implemented to assess the method’s
sensitivity, robustness, and early detection of degradation indicators. The studies’ results are
shown in Figure 2.</p>
        <p>The PCA projection shown in Figure 2a shows three relatively compact point clouds with
partial overlap. One cluster is noted to occupy the central-lower region, while the other two are
shifted to the left and upward along the PC axes. The resulting clustering structure indicates the
presence of reproducible local patterns in the feature space under the nominal conditions.
However, the projection shown in Figure 2b shows a noticeable expansion of the cluster clouds and
an increase in overlapping zones, with one component acquiring a more extended distribution in
the PC1 direction. The obtained clustering results indicate a decrease in cluster separability with
increasing noise levels. The resulting clustering projection shown in Figure 2c demonstrates a
cluster’s shift and partial separation along the PC axes. It is also noted that the clouds are partially
located along the directional gradient of PC1, which is consistent with a slow trend presence in the
features. The obtained results indicate that gradual changes in the mode manifest themselves as
smooth motion in the feature space and can be detected by monitoring centroids or drift metrics.
Figure 2d clearly shows individual outliers and distinct groups separated from the main body of
observations. It is noted that these outliers form distinct clusters or tail branches in the projection.
This behavior confirms the feature set's ability to identify short-term, high-amplitude events but
also highlights the false-positive risk interpretations without additional aggregation logic based on
duration and frequency of events. The PCA projection shown in Figure 2e contains a “compact
dense cloud” corresponding to background variability and a separate compact cluster, which is a
set of points separated in the feature space. The resulting cluster separation is consistent with the
sensor’s “sticking” period. It is noted that this distribution requires the diagnostic signal quality
criteria to be used to distinguish true physical modes from measurement artifacts and to exclude
artifactual clusters from the training set. The projection shown in Figure 2f reveals two adjacent
but distinct regions, one of which contains dense clusters, while the other contains points shifted
along PC1, which correlates with the modeled mean shift. The resulting cluster topology indicates
the possibility of detecting mode changes based on distribution changes in the feature space and
justifies the use of thresholds for changes in cluster proportions or centroid shift monitoring for
rapid alerting.</p>
        <p>a
d
f</p>
        <p>Based on the gas temperature in front of the compressor turbine parameter clustering,
corresponding diagrams were obtained, which show characteristic patterns associated with a defect
in the compressor turbine blades (Figure 3).</p>
        <p>Thus, as a result of the developed continuous clustering method’s experimental
implementations, a defect detection in a first-stage turbine blade directly related to the compressor
drive (the first turbine stage blade driving the compressor) is accomplished by identifying
persistent or repeating assignments of sliding window feature vectors to a single cluster. This
“defective” cluster’s centroid is characterized by an elevated average window temperature and
increased short-term variability, which corresponds to the physical mechanisms of localized
overheating. In this context, the proposed defect types include fatigue or impact cracks in the
leading edge and root joint, the working surfaces’ erosive abrasion, and the protective coatings’
localized loss (coating spallation), as well as an increase in the gap between the blade tip and the
guide vanes due to wear. All of these defects lead to the heat transfers’ localized deterioration and
the short-term “hot” events formation in the TG field. In feature space, this manifests as a separate,
partially distant point cloud in the PCA projection, while in the time domain, it manifests as a
short-term spike’s series and a subsequent increase in the assignments proportion to the
“defective” cluster. For operational detection, a scalar indicator representing an assignment’s
sliding proportion to the defective cluster was used, with a 0.20 empirical threshold. Exceeding this
threshold over a certain number of sliding steps is considered a warning trigger. The proposed
approach provides a balance between sensitivity and robustness to single outliers but requires
explicitly adjusting the threshold based on historical degradation markers and accounting for the
detection time delay due to the window length and aggregation step. It has been analytically
shown that individual short-term spikes can generate false positives without additional logic for
aggregation by frequency and duration of events, and a shift in the operating mode (drift or regime
change) generates a centroids’ smooth movement in the feature space, which requires the
detrending [61] or exponential “forgetting” [62] use during the cluster’s online updating.</p>
        <p>Time series with detected defect windows highlighted</p>
        <sec id="sec-4-1-1">
          <title>TG (defect scenario) Window centers defect windows 1130</title>
          <p>K1125
,
e
r
tu1120
a
r
e
p1115
m
e
T1110
s
a
G1105
1100
3
2
1
2
C0
P
-1
-2
-3
0
50
100
200
250
300
PCA projection of sliding-window features
(defect cluster highlighted)</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-1-2">
          <title>Defect cluster (#1)</title>
          <p>Cluster #2
Cluster #3
-2
0
4
6</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Classical machine learning (regression, autoencoders, boosting)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>Deep networks (and digital twins)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-4">
        <title>Matrix profile</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-5">
        <title>Batch clustering (offline Kmeans, GMM) c</title>
        <p>A comparative analysis (Table 5) shows that the developed streaming continuous clustering
method occupies a practical niche between simple physical threshold approaches and
resourceintensive deep learning models. The developed methods’ application provides high potential for
early detection of short-term patterns while being operationally compatible with online processing,
while requiring minimal labeling and moderate computational costs.</p>
        <p>According to Table 5, the developed method’s advantages over its closest analogues include
adaptability to mode drift and interpretability through matching cluster signatures with physical
degradation markers. These advantages are offset by moderate robustness to high noise levels and
the need for signal quality control modules. It is noted that traditional threshold schemes are
simple and interpretable but ineffective for short-term events. Deep models demonstrate high
accuracy with large labeled datasets but are inapplicable to resource-constrained onboard
electronics without significant optimization.</p>
        <p>Based on the above, the practical recommendation is to use streaming clustering as an
operational screening method, followed by verification through physical and statistical tests. In the
labeled precedents’ presence, it is necessary to use a retrospective confirmation model (DNN,
digital twin [62–65]) to improve accuracy and reduce the false positive proportion.</p>
        <p>It is also noted that the developed methods’ practical limitations are related to the features and
the clustering algorithm selected sets’ sensitivity to the noise level and sensor artifacts (flatlines,
sticking, etc.). Therefore, its implementation should include signal quality control procedures
(dispersion and autocorrelation checks, flatline detection) and a cluster verification module using
physically interpretable indicators (temperature markers, blade distribution, diagnostic
measurements), as well as a calibration step on labeled degradation examples to evaluate ROC
curves, select the optimal threshold, and determine the minimum warning stability time.
Implementation into an onboard monitoring system requires preliminary sensitive parameter
analysis (window length, step size, number of clusters, and fraction threshold), testing on synthetic
defect injections, and adaptive recalibration procedure development for changing operating modes,
taking into account computational limitations and latency requirements.</p>
        <p>Thus, the streaming clustering with cluster lifecycle management and a physically based
“cluster → defect” map combination is an important technical contribution, enabling early, robust,
and interpretable detection of the helicopter TE compressor turbine blades degradations’ initial
stages within the onboard computing platforms’ limitations.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>A streaming method for continuous clustering of short-term gas temperature in front of the
compressor turbine fluctuations of helicopter turboshaft engines has been developed, focused on
streaming two-second measurements. The developed method consists of a processing pipeline.
There are quality control and imputation, adaptive baseline detrending, robust local normalization,
sliding window generation, multifunctional feature extraction (statistical moments, difference
characteristics, short-term spectral-wavelet components), streaming dimensionality reduction, and
incremental clustering with exponential “forgetting” and dynamic component lifecycle
management. To translate statistical inferences into diagnostic solutions, an expert-calibrated
“cluster ↔ physical degradation signature” map and an aggregated scalar degradation metric based
on changes in the cluster assignments proportions are proposed. The developed method introduces
several modification elements to ensure a balance between sensitivity to short-term patterns and
robustness to single outliers:
1. A robust detrending and local MAD normalization integration for robustness to regime
shifts.
2. A streaming clustering scheme with dynamic component creation or deletion mechanisms
and exponential forgetting, ensuring adaptation to regime shift without batch retraining.
3. A combined anomaly score that takes into account the distance to the cluster centroid,
cluster density, and cluster population rate variations.
4. Aggregation logic based on the assignment’s sliding proportion to a defective cluster to
reduce the number of false positives.</p>
      <p>The developed method was validated using a real set of TV3-117 engine compressor turbine gas
temperature measurements (Mi-8MTV flight recordings, 1280 samples at 4 Hz after preprocessing)
and simulated scenarios, such as nominal mode, increased noise, slow drift, transient spikes, flatline
artifacts, and mode transitions. The experiment revealed a reproducible “cluster” signature
associated with the first-stage rotor blade degradations’ initial stage. A defective cluster’s centroid
is characterized by an elevated average window temperature and increased short-term variability,
forming a partially distant cloud in the PCA projection, while in the time domain, a short-term
“hot” spike series and an increase in the assignments proportion are formed. The practical
detection trigger is implemented as the defective assignments’ sliding proportion excess above a
0.20 empirical threshold over a minimum number of windows. This criterion’s introduction
demonstrated the developed methods’ ability to detect degradation departments earlier than
traditional packet or threshold schemes, with acceptable resistance to single noise pulses.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The research was supported by the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine “Theoretical and applied
aspects of the development of the aviation sphere” under Project No. 0123U104884.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>
        During this study preparation, the authors used ChatGPT-4.0, Gemini 2.5 flash, Grammarly to
correct and improve the text quality, and also to eliminate grammatical errors. The authors have
reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for this publications’ content.
[9] Q. Kang, H. Ji, Y. Yuan, Y. Ye, Autonomous helicopter shipboard recovery flight control design
based on tau theory, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 159 (2025). doi:10.1016/j.ast.2025.109956.
[10] S. Yepifanov, O. Bondarenko, Development of turboshaft engine adaptive dynamic model:
Analysis of estimation errors, Trans. Aerosp. Res. 2022 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ) (2022) 59–71.
doi:10.2478/tar-2022-0024.
[11] J. Hu, Y. Yang, N. Hu, X. Lin, Dynamic modeling and characteristic analysis of a helicopter
main reducer for tooth crack diagnosis, Measurement 247 (2025).
doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2025.116823.
[12] S. Vladov, Y. Shmelov, R. Yakovliev, M. Petchenko, Helicopters turboshaft engines parameters
identificationusing neural network technologies based on the Kalman filter, in: Proceedings of
the 18th International Conference of Information and Communication Technologies in
Education, Research, and Industrial Applications, ICTERI ’2023, Springer, Cham, Switzerland
2023, pp. 82–97. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-48325-7_7.
[13] Y. Tan, Y. Chen, Y. Zhao, M. Liu, Z. Wang, L. Du, C. Wu, X. Xu, Recent advances in signal
processing algorithms for electronic noses, Talanta 283 (2025).
doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2024.127140.
[14] K. V. Santhosh, B. K. Roy, An intelligent temperature measurement technique using J type
thermocouple with an optimal neural network, Sensors and Transducers, 147 (12) (2012), 6–14.
[15] F. Liu, J. Yang, Q. Wang, Y. Liu, H. Wang, In-situ noncontact measurement system for nozzle
throat deformation in high-temperature gas heating via laser speckle digital image correlation
with wavelet smoothing of displacement field, Measurement 201 (2022).
doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111696.
[16] C. Hu, K. Miao, M. Zhou, Y. Shen, J. Sun, Intelligent performance degradation prediction of
light-duty gas turbine engine based on limited data, Symmetry 17 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) (2025).
doi:10.3390/sym17020277.
[17] M. Pasieka, N. Grzesik, K. Kuźma, Simulation modeling of fuzzy logic controller for aircraft
engines, Int. J. Comput. 16:1 (2017) 27–33. doi:10.47839/ijc.16.1.868.
[18] S. J. Mohammadi, S. A. M. Fashandi, S. Jafari, T. Nikolaidis, A scientometric analysis and
critical review of gas turbine aero-engines control: From Whittle engine to more-electric
propulsion, Measurement and Control 54 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5 ref6">5–6</xref>
        ) (2021) 935–966. doi:10.1177/0020294020956675.
[19] Z. Zhao, Y. Sun, J. Zhang, Fault detection and diagnosis for sensor in an aero-engine system,
in: Proceedings of the 2016 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, CCDC ’2016, IEEE,
New York, NY, 2014, pp. 2977–2982. doi:10.1109/ccdc.2016.7531492.
[20] Y. Yin, X. Heng, H. Zhang, A. Wang, Modeling method and dynamic analysis of turboshaft
engine combustor rotor with curvic couplings considering thermal contact resistance under
temperature field influence, Results in Engineering 25 (2025)d.oi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103853.
[21] S. Yepifanov, Aircraft turbine engine automatic control based on adaptive dynamic models,
      </p>
      <p>
        Trans. Aerosp. Res. 2020 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ) (2020) 61–70. doi:10.2478/tar-2020-0021.
[22] H. Aygun, Thermodynamic, environmental and sustainability calculations of a conceptual
turboshaft engine under several power settings, Energy 245 (2022).
doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.123251.
[23] P. C. Lallana, G. Aldabaldetreku, A. López, D. S. Montero, G. Durana, J. Mateo, M. Á. Losada,
J. Zubia, C. Vázquez, Sensing applications in aircrafts using polymer optical fibres, Sensors
21 (11) (2021). doi:10.3390/s21113605.
[24] T. Liu, L. Gao, R. Li, Experimental data-driven flow field prediction for compressor cascade
based on deep learning and ℓ1 regularization, J. Therm. Sci. 33 (2024) 1867–1882.
doi:10.1007/s11630-024-2035-8.
[25] K. Wang, A. He, J. Liu, Q. Zhou, Z. Hu, An online learning framework for aero-engine sensor
fault detection isolation and recovery, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 162 (2025).
doi:10.1016/j.ast.2025.110241.
[26] S. Cao, H. Zuo, X. Zhao, C. Xia, Real-time gas path fault diagnosis for aeroengines based on
enhanced state-space modeling and state tracking, Aerospace 12 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ) (2025).
doi:10.3390/aerospace12070588.
[27] W. Gao, M. Pan, W. Zhou, F. Lu, J.-Q. Huang, Aero-engine modeling and control method with
model-based deep reinforcement learning, Aerospace 10 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) (2023).
doi:10.3390/aerospace10030209.
[28] Z. Wei, S. Zhang, S. Jafari, T. Nikolaidis, Gas turbine aero-engines real time on-board
modelling: A review, research challenges, and exploring the future, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 121
(2020). doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100693.b
[29] M. de Castro-Cros, M. Velasco, C. Angulo, Machine-learning-based condition assessment of
gas turbines — A review, Energies 14 (24) (2021). doi:10.3390/en14248468.
[30] H. Chen, Q. Li, Z. Ye, S. Pang, Neural network-based parameter estimation and compensation
control for time-delay servo system of aeroengine, Aerospace 12 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) (2025).
doi:10.3390/aerospace12010064.
[31] X. Chang, J. Huang, F. Lu, Sensor fault tolerant control for aircraft engines using sliding mode
observer, Energies 12 (21) (2019). doi:10.3390/en12214109.
[32] W. Cui, R. Wang, T. Sun, Z. Liu, Managing remaining useful life of cyber-aeroengine systems
using a graph spatio-temporal attention recurrent network with phase-lag index, Energy 308
(2024). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.132924.
[33] H. Zhao, X. Lin, Z. Liao, M. Xu, Y. Yao, B. Duan, Z. Song, Highly fault-tolerant thrust
estimation for gas turbine engines via feature-level dissimilarity design, Measurement 244
(2025). doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2024.116350.
[34] S. Vladov, A. Banasik, A. Sachenko, W. M. Kempa, V. Sokurenko, O. Muzychuk, P. Pikiewicz,
A. Molga, V. Vysotska, Intelligent method of identifying the nonlinear dynamic model for
helicopter turboshaft engines, Sensors 24 (19) (2024). doi:10.3390/s24196488.
[35] S. Du, W. Han, Z. Kang, F. Luo, Y. Liao, and Z. Li, A peak-finding siamese convolutional neural
network (PF-SCNN) for aero-engine hot jet FT-IR spectrum classification, Aerospace 11 (9)
(2024). doi:10.3390/aerospace11090703.
[36] J. Zou, P. Lin, Multichannel attention-based TCN-GRU network for remaining useful life
prediction of aero-engines, Energies 18 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ) (2025). doi:10.3390/en18081899.
[37] S. Vladov, V. Vysotska, V. Sokurenko, O. Muzychuk, M. Nazarkevych, V. Lytvyn, Neural
network system for predicting anomalous data in applied sensor systems, Appl. Syst. Innov. 7
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ) (2024). doi:10.3390/asi7050088.
[38] D. Chumachenko, O. Sokolov, S. Yakovlev, Fuzzy recurrent mappings in multiagent simulation
of population dynamics systems, Int. J. Comput. 19 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) (2020) 290–297.
doi:10.47839/ijc.19.2.1773.
[39] J. Rabcan, V. Levashenko, E. Zaitseva, M. Kvassay, S. Subbotin, Non-destructive diagnostic of
aircraft engine blades by Fuzzy Decision Tree, Engineering Structures 197 (2019).
doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109396.
[40] X. Han, J. Huang, X. Zhou, Z. Zou, F. Lu, W. Zhou, A novel, reduced-order optimization
method for nonlinear model correction of turboshaft engines, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 38 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        )
(2024) 2103–2122. doi:10.1007/s12206-024-0340-5.
[41] S. Shivansh, P. Akash Kumar, S. Sharanya, Predicting aircraft turbofan engine degradation
with recurrent neural networks, in: Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on
Information Technology, Electronics and Intelligent Communication Systems,
ICITEICS ’2024, IEEE, New York, NY, 2024, pp. 304–309.
doi:10.1109/ICITEICS61368.2024.10625502.
[42] H.-J. Jin, Y.-P. Zhao, M.-N. Pan, A novel method for aero-engine time-series forecasting based
on multi-resolution transformer, Expert Syst. Appl. 255 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124597.
[43] S. Tovkach, Wireless-based information model of the common operation of the elements of the
aviation gas turbine engine, Aviation 28 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) (2024) 141–147. doi:10.3846/aviation.2024.22143.
[44] W. Liu, G. Xu, X. Gu, J. Yao, M. Li, M. Lei, Q. Chen, Y. Fu, Experimental analysis and
thermodynamic modeling for multilevel heat exchange system with multifluid inaero engines.
      </p>
      <p>
        Energy 315 (2025). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.134373.
[45] A. R. Marakhimov, K. K. Khudaybergenov, Approach to the synthesis of neural network
structure during classification, Int. J. Comput.19 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) (2020) 20–26. doi:10.47839/ijc.19.1.1689.
[46] V. Hamolia, V. Melnyk, P. Zhezhnych, A. Shilinh, Intrusion detection in computer networks
using latent space representation and machine learning. Int. J. Comput. 19 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) (2020) 442–448.
doi:10.47839/ijc.19.3.1893.
[47] I. Perova, Y. Bodyanskiy, Fast medical diagnostics using autoassociative neuro-fuzzy memory,
      </p>
      <p>
        International Journal of Computing 16 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) (2017) 34–40. doi:10.47839/ijc.16.1.869.
[48] I. Perova, Y. Bodyanskiy, Adaptive human machine interaction approach for feature
selection-extraction task in medical data mining, Int. J. Comput. 17 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) (2018) 113–119.
doi:10.47839/ijc.17.2.997.
[49] S. Vladov, Y. Shmelov, R. Yakovliev, Optimization of helicopters aircraft engine working
process using neural networks technologies, in: Proceedings of the 6th International
Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems (COLINS 2022). Volume I:
Main Conference, COLINS ’2022, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Aachen, Germany, 2022,
pp. 1639–1656.
[50] G. E. Ceballos Benavides, M. A. Duarte-Mermoud, L. B. Martell, Control error convergence
using Lyapunov direct method approach for mixed fractional order model reference adaptive
control, Fractal Fract. 9 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) (2025). doi:10.3390/fractalfract9020098.
[51] Z. Hu, E. Kashyap, O. K. Tyshchenko, GEOCLUS: A fuzzy-based learning algorithm for
clustering expression datasets, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on
Computer Science, Engineering, and Education Applications, ICCSEEA ’2022, Springer, Cham,
Switzerland, 2022, pp. 337–349. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04812-8_29.
[52] N. Shakhovska, V. Yakovyna, N. Kryvinska, An improved software defect prediction algorithm
using self-organizing maps combined with hierarchical clustering and data preprocessing, in:
Proceedings if the of the 31st International Conference on Database and Expert Systems
Applications, DEXA ’2020, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2020, pp. 414–424.
doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59003-1_27.
[53] P. Cosenza, A.-L. Fauchille, D. Prêt, S. Hedan, A. Giraud, Statistical representative elementary
area of shale inferred by micromechanics, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 142 (2019) 53–73.
doi:10.1016/j.ijengsci.2019.05.012.
[54] C. M. Stefanovic, A. G. Armada, X. Costa-Perez, Second order statistics of Fisher-Snedecor
distribution and their application to burst error rate analysis of multi-hop communications,
IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 3 (2022) 2407–2424. doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2022.3224835.
[55] S. Vladov, R. Yakovliev, O. Hubachov, J. Rud, Neuro-fuzzy system for detection fuel
consumption of helicopters turboshaft engines, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International
Workshop on Information Technologies: Theoretical and Applied Problems 2023, ITTAP ’2023,
CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Aachen, Germany, 2024, pp. 55–72.
[56] S. Vladov, R. Yakovliev, O. Hubachov, J. Rud, S. Drodova, A. Perekrest, Modified discrete
neural network PID controller for controlling the helicopters turboshaft engines free turbine
speed, in: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 5th International Conference on Modern Electrical and
Energy System, MEES ’2023, IEEE, New York, NY, 2023. pp. 797–802.
doi:10.1109/MEES61502.2023.10402433.
[57] S. Vladov, Y. Shmelov, R. Yakovliev, M. Petchenko, Modified neural network fault-tolerant
closed onboard helicopters turboshaft engines automatic control system, in: Proceedings of the
7th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems. Volume I:
Machine Learning Workshop, CoLInS ’2023, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Aachen, Germany,
2023, pp. 160–179.
[58] B. Rusyn, R. Kosarevych, O. Lutsyk, V. Korniy, Segmentation of atmospheric clouds images
obtained by remote sensing, in: Processing of the 2018 14th International Conference on
Advanced Trends in Radioelecrtronics, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering,
TCSET ’2018, IEEE, New York, NY, 2018, pp. 213–216. doi:10.1109/tcset.2018.8336189.
[59] R. Donida Labati, A. Genovese, E. Muñoz, V. Piuri, F. Scotti, G. Sforza, Computational
intelligence for biometric applications: A survey, Int. J. Comput. 15 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) (2016) 40–49.
doi:10.47839/ijc.15.1.829.
[60] B. Rusyn, I. Prudyus, V. Ostap, Fingerprint image enhancement algorithm, in: Processing of
the 6th International Conference of the Experience of Designing and Application of CAD
Systems in Microelectronics, CADSM ’2001, IEEE, New York, NY, 2001, pp. 193–194.
doi:10.1109/CADSM.2001.975804.
[61] Y. Varetskyy, B. Rusyn, A. Molga, A. Ignatovych, A new method of fingerprint key protection
of grid credential, Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing 84 (2010) 99–103.
doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16295-4_11.
[62] F. Geche, A. Batyuk, O. Mulesa, V. Voloshchuk, The combined time series forecasting model,
in: Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Third International Conference on Data Stream Mining &amp;
Processing, DSMP ’2020, IEEE, New York, NY, 2020, pp. 272–275.
doi:10.1109/dsmp47368.2020.9204311.
[63] V. Kovtun, I. Izonin, M. Gregus, Model of functioning of the centralized wireless information
ecosystem focused on multimedia streaming, Egypt. Inform. J. 23 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ) (2022) 89–96.
doi:10.1016/j.eij.2022.06.009.
[64] B. Tarle, M. Akkalaksmi, Improving classification performance of neuro-fuzzy classifier by
imputing missing data, Int. J. Comput. 18 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ) (2019) 495–501. doi:10.47839/ijc.18.4.1619.
[65] O. Bisikalo, O. Danylchuk, V. Kovtun, O. Kovtun, O. Nikitenko, V. Vysotska, Modeling of
operation of information system for critical use in the conditions of influence of a complex
certain negative factor, Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 20 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ) (2022) 1904–1913.
doi:10.1007/s12555-021-0368-6.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Gao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Pan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Lu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.-Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Aero-engine modeling and control method with model-based deep reinforcement learning</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Aerospace</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2023</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/aerospace10030209.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Castiglione</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Perrone</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Strafella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ficarella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Bova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Linear model of a turboshaft aero-engine including components degradation for control-oriented applications</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Energies</source>
          <volume>16</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2023</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/en16062634.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Ji</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Real-time optimization control of variable rotor speed based on Helicopter/ turboshaft engine on-board composite system</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Energy</source>
          <volume>301</volume>
          (
          <year>2024</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.energy.
          <year>2024</year>
          .
          <volume>131701</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Vladov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Shmelov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Yakovliev</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Petchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Drozdova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Neural network method for helicopters turboshaft engines working process parameters identification at flight modes</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 4th International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy System</source>
          ,
          <source>MEES '</source>
          <year>2022</year>
          , IEEE, New York, NY,
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>604</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>609</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/MEES58014.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>10005670</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.
          <string-name>
            <surname>-L. Tang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A probabilistic design methodology for a turboshaft engine overall performance analysis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Adv. Mech. Eng</source>
          .
          <volume>6</volume>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1155/
          <year>2014</year>
          /976853.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Gu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Pang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Wu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Turbo-shaft engine adaptive neural network control based on nonlinear state space equation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Chinese Journal of Aeronautics</source>
          <volume>37</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <fpage>493</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>507</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.cja.
          <year>2023</year>
          .
          <volume>08</volume>
          .012.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Xia,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Structural reliability analysis of aero-engine turbine components based on particle swarm optimization back propagation neural network</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Appl. Sci</source>
          .
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2025</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/app15063160.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>In-situ noncontact measurement system for nozzle throat deformation in high-temperature gas heating via laser speckle digital image correlation with wavelet smoothing of displacement field</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Measurement</source>
          <volume>201</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.measurement.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>111696</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>