<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>E. Guillaume, F. Didieux, A. Thiry, A. Bellivier, Real-scale fire tests of one bedroom
apartments with regard to tenability assessment, Fire Safety Journal</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.08.014</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Machine learning method for predicting smoke blockage time at apartment evacuation exits⋆</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Oleksandr Khlevnoi</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nataliia Zhezlo-Khlevna</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Igor Malets</string-name>
          <email>igor.malets@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Olga Smotr</string-name>
          <email>olgasmotr@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Roman</string-name>
          <email>roman@golovatiy.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Lviv State University of Life Safety</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Kleparivska 35, Lviv</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>70</volume>
      <issue>2014</issue>
      <fpage>81</fpage>
      <lpage>97</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The article explores the application of machine learning methods to study the time of smoke blockage of evacuation routes during the initial stage of a fire in residential premises. A dataset was formed through numerical experiments conducted in the PyroSim software, where 140 fire scenarios were modeled with varying values of the fire spread angle, distance to the exit, total area of opened doors and windows. Correlation analysis was performed to assess relationships between parameters, and polynomial regression of the second degree with variable scaling was employed for modeling, yielding interpretable coefficients. The results were validated using mean squared error (MSE) and coefficient of determination (R²), complemented by visualizations of dependencies. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of combining numerical modeling with machine learning for predicting smoke blockage time, offering practical implications for enhancing evacuation safety.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;machine learning</kwd>
        <kwd>polynomial regression</kwd>
        <kwd>PyroSim</kwd>
        <kwd>numerical experiment</kwd>
        <kwd>smoke blockage time</kwd>
        <kwd>evacuation routes</kwd>
        <kwd>correlation analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>fire prediction</kwd>
        <kwd>residential premises</kwd>
        <kwd>evacuation safety1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Fires in residential buildings remain one of the leading causes of human casualties and material
losses worldwide, posing a serious threat to the safety of occupants and the stability of urban
infrastructure. Statistics indicate that a significant portion of fatalities during fires is linked to
evacuation delays in the initial stages of an emergency. These delays stem from residents’
inadequate preparedness for critical conditions, inefficient design of fire protection systems, and
the influence of building structural features that can complicate safe evacuation.</p>
      <p>The first minutes following the outbreak of a fire are critical for saving lives, as this is when the
rapid spread of smoke, rising temperatures, and accumulation of toxic gases create conditions
capable of blocking evacuation routes. Even a brief delay of a few seconds can sharply increase the
risk to life, especially in densely populated buildings. In this context, studying the initial phase of
evacuation becomes paramount, as it is during this stage that the preconditions for successful
rescue are established.</p>
      <p>During the initial evacuation phase from a residential premise (within the first 2–3 minutes of a
fire’s onset) smoke is the most significant factor among all fire hazards affecting the accessibility of
evacuation exits. It forms almost instantly, particularly given that the primary combustible load in
residential spaces consists of wood and synthetic materials (furniture and textiles), and can densely
fill a space within 1–3 minutes. This rapid spread makes smoke the primary threat, as the loss of
visibility directly hinders movement toward doors or other exits. For instance, when visibility
drops below 5–10 meters, locating an exit becomes extremely difficult. This typically occurs before
other factors reach critical levels. Although residents are usually familiar with their surroundings,
the psycho-emotional stress of a fire negatively impacts rational decision-making.</p>
      <p>Other hazardous factors, such as temperature, carbon monoxide (CO), or carbon dioxide (CO₂)
concentrations, while posing significant risks, develop more slowly or have an indirect effect on
physically blocking exits. For example, temperature reaches critical levels (50–100°C at floor level)
only after 3–5 minutes, and even then, passing through a doorway in 1–2 seconds may cause only
minor burns without halting evacuation. Carbon monoxide accumulates relatively quickly, but
during the brief time (1–2 seconds) it takes to pass through an exit, a person does not receive a
lethal dose. Undoubtedly, studying CO’s impact during the initial fire stage is necessary, but not
solely at the evacuation exit zone. Carbon dioxide, meanwhile, reaches dangerous concentrations
(&gt;5%) only after 5–10 minutes, making it less relevant in the initial phase. Thus, investigating the
patterns of smoke-related blockage of evacuation exits in residential spaces is a priority task for the
early evacuation stage.</p>
      <p>Machine learning plays a pivotal role in such studies, unlocking new possibilities for fire and
evacuation modeling. With its ability to analyze complex nonlinear relationships and process large
datasets, machine learning techniques enable accurate predictions of the dynamics of hazardous
fire factors and their impact on evacuation route accessibility.</p>
      <p>The combined use of fire modeling software, such as PyroSim, with machine learning tools is
highly effective. PyroSim facilitates detailed simulations of various scenarios during the initial fire
stage, generating extensive datasets on fire hazards while accounting for room geometry, materials,
and ventilation conditions. These datasets serve as a foundation for training machine learning
models capable of identifying complex nonlinear relationships between input factors (e.g., fire
shape, distance to the exit, area of open door or window spaces) and target outcomes (e.g., the time
of smoke blockage of evacuation exits). This approach integrates the precision of physical
modeling with the analytical power of machine learning, enabling real-time fire behavior
predictions, optimizing evacuation strategies, and enhancing the effectiveness of fire safety
measures without the need for costly experiments or simulations for each specific case.</p>
      <p>Thus, applying machine learning to study the initial fire stage not only broadens scientific
horizons but also holds practical significance for reducing human casualties and material losses in
residential buildings. Understanding how smoke and other factors affect evacuation routes,
combined with advanced modeling technologies, enables the development of more effective
response strategies and the improvement of fire safety systems, making them more adaptable to
real-world conditions.</p>
      <p>Research Object is the process of smoke spread in residential buildings during the initial
evacuation stage of a fire.</p>
      <p>Research Subject is the influence of geometric fire parameters and the area of open window
and door openings on the time of smoke blockage of evacuation routes in residential premises
during the initial fire stage, as well as methods for predicting this time using machine learning
algorithms.</p>
      <p>Research Goal is to develop a machine learning-based model for predicting the time of smoke
blockage of evacuation routes in apartments to enhance the efficiency of fire risk assessment and
planning safe evacuation.</p>
      <p>To achieve this goal, the following tasks must be addressed:
1. Conducting computer modeling of various initial stage of fire scenarios to create a dataset
for training a machine learning model.
2. Analyzing the impact of fire shape, distance to the evacuation exit, and the area of open
window and door openings on the time of evacuation exit blockage, and identifying
patterns of smoke spread based on simulation data.</p>
      <p>3. Developing and testing a machine learning model for predicting the time of exit blockage.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Literature Review</title>
      <p>Analysis of research dedicated to the geometric aspects and natural ventilation at the initial stage
of fire development, as well as their impact on evacuation processes, allows dividing the existing
studies into several directions: numerical modeling of fire hazards; use of statistical methods and
machine learning to predict fire safety parameters; combination of numerical modeling and
statistical methods to solve the fire safety tasks.</p>
      <p>
        Numerical modeling of fire development using the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) enables the
investigation of various aspects of the initial fire stage [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] without conducting costly full-scale
experiments. Specifically, several works [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] and [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] are focused on ventilation in the context of
modeling fire dynamics. These studies employed numerical methods, including FDS, to analyze the
influence of ventilation parameters on smoke and heat flow propagation. In the study by Li et al.
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], a CFD model was developed that accounted for wall thermal conductivity, heat release rate
(HRR) variations, and spatial geometric parameters. The use of such models allows for the
determination of hazardous fire factor indicators at a specific moment in time for a given space.
These articles emphasized patterns of hazardous fire factor propagation rather than the time of
their blockage of evacuation exits. Issues of evacuation during the initial stage of fire in residential
premises were addressed in works [6] and [7]. These articles are dedicated to general evacuation
aspects, as well as the parameters and dimensions of evacuation routes and exits. Several studies
demonstrated that ventilation openings significantly affect the dynamics of smoke and heat spread.
Cai N. and Chow W.K. [8] utilized numerical modeling to analyze various scenarios of door and
window openings. Their results suggest that the size and position of ventilation openings can
substantially alter the time it takes for evacuation routes to become unusable. In study [9], the
combination of natural and exhaust ventilation and its impact on smoke propagation patterns was
used to develop a predictive model, which subsequently enabled smoke spread assessment without
relying on FDS.
      </p>
      <p>It is worth noting that machine learning is increasingly applied to model complex physical
processes. For instance, in study [10], neural networks were used to improve the consideration of
ignition source parameters. In work [11], convolutional neural networks were employed to
determine parameters of evacuation flow movement. Other studies, such as [12] and [13], showcase
the potential of regression and classification algorithms for assessing fire types and evacuation
process parameters. Such approaches enable rapid processing of large datasets and adaptation of
models to various fire scenarios. In[14] authors proposed a generative adversarial network
(GAN)based method for rapid automatic generation of diverse and physically plausible fire scenarios in
residential buildings, enabling large-scale training datasets for machine-learning fire dynamics
models without time-consuming manual CFD simulations.</p>
      <p>The analysis of the aforementioned studies leads to the conclusion that the combined use of
computer modeling, which conveniently and efficiently generates large amounts of data, and
machine learning, which facilitates the analysis of relationships within this data, is a promising and
actively developing tool [15, 16]. Together with studies on flame-retardant materials [17] the
machine learning methods are able to calculate how material composition can significantly
influence fire spread dynamics, which is critical for evacuation modeling. Such approaches can be
successfully applied to determine the influence of various factors on fire development and the
spread of hazardous factors at the initial stage, particularly the time of smoke blockage of
evacuation exits.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Materials and Methods</title>
      <p>To study the time of smoke blockage of evacuation exits during the initial stage of a fire, a dataset
of 140 fire scenarios was created using the PyroSim 2024 software package, which is a graphical
pre- and post-processor for Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) developed by NIST. FDS numerically
solves the Navier–Stokes equations for low-Mach-number thermally driven flow using the large
eddy simulation (LES) approach with the mixture fraction combustion model and a single-step
irreversible reaction. Radiative heat transfer is modelled via the finite volume solution of the
radiation transport equation for a non-scattering grey gas, with absorption coefficients determined
using the RadCal narrow-band model [18].</p>
      <p>Three-dimensional models of typical one-, two- and three-room residential apartments (total
area 40–80 m²) were constructed. Walls were defined as 0.5 m thick inert brick layers with thermal
inertia kρc = 3.2 × 105 J2/(m4·K2·s), corresponding to typical clay brick used in Ukrainian residential
construction. The fire source was modelled as a fixed-area burner with constant heat release rate
per unit area of 200 kW/m², corresponding to the early flaming stage of upholstered furniture. Fire
spread shape was controlled by the burner geometry: 90° sector (corner), 180° (against wall), or 360°
(centre placement) [19]. Distance from the fire source to the evacuation door l varied from 2 to 10
m. Total open areas of doors Sd and windows Sw were varied in the ranges 0–1.8 m² and 0–2.5 m²,
respectively. The computational domain was discretised with a uniform cubic mesh of 0.1 m,
satisfying the non-dimensional criterion D*/δx ≈ 8–12 for accurate resolution of the fire plume. The
smoke blockage time τ was rigorously defined as the earliest instant when the extinction coefficient
K in the layer 1.5–2.0 m above the floor in the doorway reached the value corresponding to
visibility of approximately 10 m under typical residential lighting conditions — a widely accepted
tenability limit for evacuation. Each simulation ran for 300 s with output recorded every 1 s.
The resulting dataset (140 records) was processed in Python 3.11 using Pandas. All four predictors
(a, d, Sd, Sw) were standardised via StandardScaler. Second-order polynomial features with
interaction terms were generated using scikit-learn PolynomialFeatures(degree=2,
include_bias=False), yielding 14 predictors. The regression model was fitted using
LinearRegression() with default parameters (ordinary least squares). Model quality was assessed by
the coefficient of determination R2 and mean squared error (MSE) on the entire dataset.
Visualisations were created using Matplotlib and Seaborn.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Experiment, Results and Discussion</title>
      <p>4.1. Experiment
Within the framework of this study, the first step was to form a comprehensive dataset that could
be used to establish a regression relationship between the characteristics of residential premises
and the parameters of hazardous fire factor propagation. The aim of the study was to quantitatively
assess the influence of external factors on the time of smoke blockage of an evacuation exit from a
dwelling. The obtained data served as the foundation for developing a predictive model using
machine learning methods to enhance the efficiency of evacuation planning and optimize fire
safety measures in residential buildings.</p>
      <p>A numerical experiment simulating fire outbreak scenarios was conducted using the PyroSim
software package, which is based on the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) from NIST. In the first
stage, a three-dimensional models of typical residential dwellings with an area within the ranges of
40-80 m² were created, consisting of one, two or three rooms, a corridor, and an evacuation exit.
The models’ geometry included walls (0.5 m thick, made of brick), doors (0.9 m wide, 2 m high),
and windows (area ranging from 0 to 2.5 m² depending on the scenario). All objects were defined in
the PyroSim interface using built-in tools to construct a computational mesh with a cell size of 0.1
m, ensuring a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency.</p>
      <p>In the second stage, the scenario parameters were defined. The fire source was modeled as a
heat-releasing object with an initial power of 200 kW per m², corresponding to a typical fire source
at the initial stage (e.g., burning furniture). Different placements of the fire source allowed for
accounting for various possible fire spread patterns. For instance, if the fire source was located in a
corner of the room, its shape resembled a 90° sector; if near one of the walls, a semicircle (180°); and
if in the center of the room, a full circle (360°). The area of open doors and windows in the premises
was set within ranges of 0–2 m² and 0–2.5 m², respectively, to cover various ventilation conditions
and evacuation route accessibility. For each scenario, a simulation duration of 300 seconds with a
time step of 0.1 s was established, enabling the capture of smoke propagation dynamics during the
early fire stage (Figure 1).</p>
      <p>The simulation was performed taking into account physical parameters: the air temperature was
set at 20°C, the pressure at 101325 Pa, and the ventilation rate varied depending on the openness of
windows and doors. The simulation results, including smoke concentration and visibility, were
recorded using a virtual sensor placed near the evacuation exit at a height of 0.5 m from the floor
(Figure 2).</p>
      <p>The smoke blockage time (Tsmoke) was defined as the moment when visibility dropped below
10 m, corresponding to a soot concentration considered critical for safe evacuation according to
regulatory requirements [20]. A total of 140 simulations with various parameter combinations were
conducted, and their results were used as a dataset for analysis using machine learning techniques.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.2. Regression Analysis</title>
        <p>The first step of the regression analysis involved studying the correlations between the parameters
Tsmoke, Angle, Distance, Doors, and Windows. This allowed for the identification of the factors
with the greatest influence on the target variable (Tsmoke), the detection of potential linear or
nonlinear dependencies, and the assessment of the degree of collinearity among the independent
variables. The correlation heatmap is presented in Figure 3.</p>
        <p>As observed, the time of smoke blockage (Tsmoke) is most strongly influenced by the distance
from the fire source to the evacuation exit (Distance, 0.86), making distance a key factor in the
smoke blockage of the exit. The fire shape (Angle) has a significant but lesser impact (–0.27),
indicating that a larger fire spread angle results in faster blockage of the evacuation exit. The area
of open windows (Windows, 0.32) and doors (Doors, –0.1) exhibits a weaker influence, though their
contribution may be significant in nonlinear models. It is noteworthy that opening windows at the
initial stage slows down the blockage of evacuation exits, while opening doors slightly accelerates
it. This is logical, as an open evacuation exit facilitates smoke egress through it, whereas open
windows divert some of the smoke away. The correlations between predictors are minimal,
indicating the absence of multicollinearity.</p>
        <p>The next step involved creating second-degree polynomial features (linear, quadratic, and
interaction terms) using the Scikit-learn library. The data were split into training (80%) and testing
(20%) sets with a fixed random_state=42 for reproducibility. A regression model was trained on the
polynomial features, followed by predicting the smoke blockage time values for the test set. To
evaluate the model's quality, the mean squared error (MSE) and coefficient of determination (R²)
were calculated, and visualizations such as a graph showing the dependence of the smoke blockage
time of the evacuation exit on the distance from the fire source to the exit under different fire
shapes (Figure 4) and a scatter diagram of predicted versus actual values (Figure 5) were
constructed.
where
τ – time of smoke blockage of the evacuation exit during a fire in a residential premise, s;
l – distance from the fire source to the evacuation exit, m;
a – angle of fire spread, degrees;
Sd – area of open doors, m²;
Sw – area of open windows, m².</p>
        <p>As a result, a model with high accuracy was obtained: the MSE was approximately 35.12, and
the R² was about 0.93. The scatter diagram demonstrated a close alignment between predicted and
actual values, while the graphs confirmed an increase in Tsmoke with greater Distance and its
dependency on Angle, consistent with the physical patterns of smoke propagation.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>4.3. Discussion</title>
        <p>The results of the second-degree polynomial regression obtained in this study indicate high
accuracy of the model in predicting the time of smoke blockage of evacuation routes during the
initial stage of a fire in residential premises. The coefficient of determination value of R² = 0.93
explains 93% of the variation in the target variable based on parameters such as the distance from
the fire source to the evacuation exit. The mean squared error (MSE) of 35.12 is acceptable and
aligns with the natural variability of fire conditions. This confirms the effectiveness of the chosen
approach for modeling complex nonlinear dependencies identified through numerical experiments
in PyroSim.</p>
        <p>Analysis of the model coefficients revealed that the distance to the evacuation exit has the
greatest positive impact on the blockage duration: the greater the distance, the longer it takes for
smoke to reach a critical concentration near the evacuation exit. The presence of open windows
also significantly increases the smoke blockage time, which can be explained by enhanced
ventilation and the removal of some smoke. Conversely, open doors produce an opposite effect.
With open doors, air circulation intensifies, and a portion of the smoke begins to exit through the
evacuation route, thereby increasing its concentration. The fire shape plays a somewhat lesser role,
though its interaction with other parameters underscores the importance of a comprehensive
analysis.</p>
        <p>Visualization of the dependencies confirmed that the smoke blockage time of the evacuation
exit increases with the distance to the exit, with this effect becoming more pronounced at higher
values of the Angle parameter (360°), possibly related to the direction of smoke spread within the
premises. The scatterplot demonstrated a close correspondence between predicted and actual
values, indicating the model's reliability for practical application.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>During the study, computer modeling of various scenarios of the initial stage of fire development in
a residential premise was conducted using the PyroSim software package. This enabled the creation
of a dataset with 140 records for training a machine learning model, incorporating various
parameters such as the distance to the evacuation exit, the area of open door and window
openings, and the fire shape. Correlation analysis revealed that the distance to the exit and the area
of windows have the greatest positive impact on the smoke blockage time, while open doors
slightly reduce this time. Nonlinear patterns of smoke spread were identified, including an increase
in the evacuation exit blockage time with greater distance and a dependency on fire shape, which
was confirmed through visualizations.</p>
      <p>The developed second-degree polynomial regression model demonstrated high accuracy in
predicting the evacuation exit blockage time (R² ≈ 0.93, MSE ≈ 35.12). Testing showed the model’s
ability to adequately reflect the influence of the studied factors, making it promising for practical
applications in risk assessment and evacuation planning. Thus, all tasks outlined in the article—
modeling, analyzing the impact of parameters, and developing a predictive model—were
accomplished, confirming the effectiveness of combining numerical modeling with machine
learning.</p>
      <p>Equation (1) for calculating the time of smoke blockage of an evacuation exit (τ) is useful
because it enables quick and accurate prediction of the critical moment when smoke renders safe
evacuation from a residential premise impossible. This facilitates fire risk assessment without the
need for complex simulations for each scenario, aids in optimizing evacuation planning, and
enhances fire safety systems, thereby improving occupant safety. Built on machine learning and
numerical modeling, this approach provides a practical tool for making informed decisions in real
time.</p>
      <p>A limitation of the current study is the relatively modest dataset size (140 scenarios).
Nevertheless, this volume proved sufficient to achieve stable training of the second-degree
polynomial model with R² &gt; 0.92 and low MSE. The dataset is being continuously expanded, and
future work will incorporate additional influencing factors and more advanced machine-learning
architectures. It should also focus on accounting for the influence of wind loads, which can
significantly alter smoke propagation dynamics in residential premises, particularly in high-rise
buildings where airflows through windows play a critical role. Additionally, it is advisable to
investigate the effects of smoke control ventilation systems, designed for high-rise structures,
which can delay or redirect smoke, affecting the blockage time of evacuation routes. Integrating
these factors into machine learning models will enhance their accuracy and adaptability to
realworld building operation conditions.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>During the preparation of this work, the authors used X-GPT-4 in order to grammar and spelling
check. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full
responsibility for the publication’s content.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Jiang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A</surname>
          </string-name>
          . S. Bøe,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Numerical simulation of fire spread in a large-scale open CLT compartment, Fire Saf</article-title>
          . J. (
          <year>2024</year>
          )
          <article-title>104289</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.firesaf.
          <year>2024</year>
          .
          <volume>104289</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Yi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Lei</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Deng</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>L.</surname>
          </string-name>
           Ma, J. Fan,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Bai</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.-M. Shu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Numerical Simulation of Fire Smoke Spread in a Super High-Rise Building for Different Fire Scenarios, Adv</article-title>
          . Civ. Eng.
          <year>2019</year>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>11</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1155/
          <year>2019</year>
          /1659325.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Saber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kashef</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bwalya</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lougheed</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sultan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A numerical study on the effect of ventilation on fire development in a medium-sized residential room (Report No</article-title>
          . NRCC-
          <volume>50357</volume>
          ). National Research Council Canada. https://doi.org/10.4224/20377990.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
             D. 
            <surname>Lulea</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
             
            <surname>Iordache</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I.</surname>
          </string-name>
           
          <article-title>Năstase, Numerical Model Development of the Air Temperature Variation in a Room Set on Fire for Different Ventilation Scenarios</article-title>
          , Appl. Sci.
          <volume>11</volume>
          .24 (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
          <article-title>11698</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3390/app112411698.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Beji</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Brohez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Merci</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>CFD study of fire-induced pressure variation in a mechanically-ventilated air-tight compartment</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Fire Safety Journal</source>
          <volume>115</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>Article 103126</article-title>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.firesaf.
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <volume>103126</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>