<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>O. Mierka, M. Geveler und S. Turek, Optimization of Multimaterial Dies via Numerical
Simulations,“ German Success Stories in Industrial Mathematics, p.</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Manufacturing and AI - Industrial Generation and Artificial Optimisation Machine Data</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marius Dörner</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Alexander Schulz</string-name>
          <email>a.schulz@ianus-simulation.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Félix Martínez</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Damjan Murn</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dragan Radolović</string-name>
          <email>dragan.radolovic@xlab.si</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Miguel A. Mateo-Casalí</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Raul Poler</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>IANUS Simulation GmbH</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Sebrathweg 5, Dortmund, 44149</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>KERLAN Technology Research Centre, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>20500 Arrasate, Basque Country</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Research Centre on Production Management and Engineering (CIGIP), Universitat Politècnica de València</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>XLAB d.o.o.</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Pot za Brdom 100, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia, EU</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>371</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>2018</fpage>
      <lpage>2020</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The AIDEAS project targets the development of AI technologies strategically designed to improve European engineering companies' sustainability, agility, and resilience throughout the lifecycle of industrial assets, i.e., in the design, manufacturing, and repair/reuse/recycling phases. In the context of the AIDEAS project, this workshop paper focuses on the early stages of the product development process to accelerate the development process with the help of AI-supported tools. The results of some of these AI solutions will also help at a later stage to decide which machine parameters need to be considered and optimised during product development to optimise the later life cycle according to the current requirements of the repair, reuse, and recycle phases.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>1 Design Optimization</kwd>
        <kwd>Artificial Intelligence</kwd>
        <kwd>Simulation</kwd>
        <kwd>Digital Twin</kwd>
        <kwd>Machine Design</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Methodology</title>
      <p>This paper outlines the objectives and structure of Work Package 3 (WP3) in the broader context
of the BUILD process for the AI-assisted lifecycle of industrial plants. WP3 focuses mainly on the
initial phase of the BUILD process, the DESIGN part, with the aim of developing AI-supported
optimisation modules for the construction of industrial plants.</p>
      <p>The aims of WP3 include the development of AI-based optimisation modules for industrial plant
engineering. As a result, companies can improve their resilience by reducing waste and increasing
their responsiveness to changing customer needs. The aims are specified in the relevant subchapters
below. Each of the tasks deals with different aspects of AI-supported optimisation. The tasks cover
optimal design, data synthesis, integration with standard systems, data storage and exchange, and
continuous validation. Depending on the task, competencies and project phases, the companies
IANUS, IKERLAN, XLAB, CERTH and ITI work together to achieve the objectives of the work
package.</p>
      <p>The goal is to create a framework that facilitates the optimal design of industrial machinery by
integrating AI into mechanisms, structures, and control components. This will be achieved through
data synthetization, integration with CAD systems, appropriate data exchange mechanisms and
continuous validation.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Machine Design Optimiser (MDO)</title>
      <p>This task focuses on developing a toolkit to assist designers in optimally defining the key design
parameters in multi-physical systems, enhancing machine performance as required for each scenario.
The toolkit will be based on reduced models developed by AI from physically based model simulations
that will take account of the degradation of the joints during the entire life cycle of the machine. The
optimiser will need a theoretical model (physical or data-driven model) that can estimate the system's
behaviour. The developments done during the first part of the project are related to the following
topics:</p>
      <p>Definition of the Demonstration Scenarios and Monitoring KPIs Definition for the two pilot
●
use cases (PAMA and BBM).
●
●</p>
      <p>Definition of the use case specifications, goals, and restrictions for the two pilot use cases.</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Definition of the user interface Mock-ups.</title>
        <p>● Significant developments of the use case model to be used as case studies.</p>
        <p>The PAMA use case, a dynamic model of the 5-axis machine, has been developed considering the
wear development of the vertical sliding system. The optimization objective has been defined as a
trade-off between the static stiffness and the number of cycles before wear creates backlash. The next
figure represents a schematic representation of the objectives, and the parameter expected behaviour
is represented (Figure 1).</p>
        <p>A parametric modelling of the extrusion die head is built for the BBM model. This allows the
generalisation of different designs of the flow channel of the die just by changing parametric values
like diameter, number of spirals or total height and directly performing highly accurate
3D-CFDSimulation with it. With this opportunity, numerous flow simulations can be performed by the MDG,
which will be presented in the next chapter. With the calculated data out of the MDG, a meta-model
can be created, which allows the running of AI-based optimum algorithms within a short period of
time.</p>
        <p>For the PAMA use case, the first version of the dynamic model has been developed and validated,
verifying that the model is able to predict the cycles to wear. This model generates data for the next
step of developing the AI optimizer. In the Case of the blow mold dies for BBM, different existing dies
were simulated via the parametric model. They show a good match regarding pressure loss, flow
homogeneity and overlap of the different layers. This shows that the model can be used for
optimization strategies. To ensure that, a manual first optimization of one die was performed,
resulting in significantly shorter residence times, a more homogenous outflow, and thus waste
reduction and the capability of using a higher percentage of recycled material.</p>
        <p>In the coming months, the AI optimizer is expected to be developed. The core concept involves
utilizing AI to generate an improved reduced model for efficient iteration, optimizing the design
within a reasonable timeframe. The accompanying image illustrates the proposed implementation,
beginning with the dynamic model and parameter definition. Initial simulations are conducted to
obtain KPIs for these designs, and the results are used to create a reduced-order model of system
behaviour. This reduced model proposes "near-optimum" parameter values, evaluated through the
multibody model. The process is iterated until an optimal value is achieved.</p>
        <p>The main anticipated advantages include:</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Improved iteration efficiency. Valuable information about the sensitivity of each design parameter, aiding future design proposals and evaluations.</title>
        <p>●
●
●
●
●</p>
        <p>An evolutionary AI approach designs spiral distributors with different parameters for the BBM
model, generating thousands of variants for efficient production process simulation. The meta-model
significantly reduces simulation time compared to real 3D-CFD simulations. The MDO identifies
designs that best match the desired KPIs, selects and examines the top 30% for regularities, and creates
new digital twins until an optimal distributor within a confidence interval is identified or the
maximum iteration time (TBD) is reached [1].</p>
        <p>Parametric machine designs based on physics models are commonly used in the design stage for
performance verification, reducing development time. Despite the good agreement with real
behaviour, these simulations can be time-consuming, limiting exploration during the design phase.
Optimization is often neglected due to a lack of knowledge and required simulation time. To address
this, the tool simplifies the process by requiring the user to provide:</p>
        <p>A parametric simulation model (physical or data-driven) to calculate the desired KPI.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Parameter range values.</title>
        <p>Defined total iterations, with initial trials recommending a reduced number for faster
results.</p>
        <p>After simulation, the tool provides optimal parameter proposals and sensitivity analysis, assisting
the designer in understanding each parameter's relative effect on the objective. This information is
crucial for defining the design concept.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>1. Machine Synthetic Data Generator (MDG)</title>
      <p>This task focuses on the synthesis of data for the training of optimisation modules. Preparatory
work has already been carried out on this based on the FeatFlow simulation code used [2]. It involves
the creation of AI solutions for shorter time series and production volumes through the artificial
generation of data using digital twins [3] and simulations. Real and historical data is also used for
training without data synthesis. The front-end components (figure 4) required to implement the given
machine designs and provide operational constraints have been successfully created. These
components have been tested with dummy data sets to ensure their functionality and reliability.</p>
      <p>A dedicated front-end for presenting results has been developed in the realm of new material data
generation. Pilot BBM studies have identified material parameter ranges to refine simulations, as
depicted in Figure 5. Initial automated simulations have been rigorously tested with dummy datasets.
This collaborative effort signifies the successful establishment and validation of key components,
laying the groundwork for further project progress.</p>
      <p>This collaborative effort signifies the successful establishment and validation of key components,
laying the groundwork for further project progress. Regarding start-up parameters, pilot BBM studies
will define possible data ranges, followed by the creation of an extensive simulation dataset to train
the AI. Subsequently, the AI will be integrated into the front-end, significantly advancing overall
project functionality.</p>
      <p>Upcoming tasks include developing a valid approximation for various materials to generate new
material data. Simulation results will be validated using diverse materials and real-life data for
accuracy. A substantial set of simulation data, akin to start-up parameters, will be generated for AI
training, and the AI will be integrated into the front-end to streamline the material data generation
process. These planned steps represent the next phase towards achieving the project's overarching
goals. The market gap analysis identifies challenges such as a lack of simulation expertise, insufficient
customer awareness in selecting data analysis tools, and redundant execution of real experiments. To
address expertise gaps, the MDG solution will provide an easy way for any employee to generate data
and initiate simulations effortlessly.</p>
      <p>Future developments aim to introduce an automated AI solution to combat insufficient customer
awareness in selecting and using AI for data evaluation and experimental design construction. This
MDG solution ensures optimal data analysis while mitigating the risk of biased sample data.
Customers facing capacity constraints in running real experiments require AI-supported simulations
to generate training data. The project aims to seamlessly integrate into the market, offering accessible
and automated solutions to close existing gaps and enhance the overall user experience [4].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>4. CAx Addon (CAx)</title>
      <p>Task T3.3 transfers the AI-supported optimisation modules developed in T3.1 and T3.2 to
production. This includes the compatibility of the modules with standard CAD/CAM/CAE systems,
the integration of APIs and the user interface, and testing and performance optimisation.</p>
      <p>For the common CAD Software Autodesk Fusion, which is a low entry in terms of pricing and
therefore used by many small businesses, a plugin was written that connects directly to the IANUS
StrömungsRaum(c), which performs the Machine Data Generator (figure 6). Therefore, a bank
security API and Login were written, enabling direct access via Fusion to perform simulations without
using additional software. Due to the cloud computing approach of StrömungsRaum(c), the user can
perform the simulations from any computer, which allows them to run Fusion 360. Fusion was
selected as the first adaptor CAD software; besides the low-end pricing, it is also cloud-based and,
therefore, usable from many different devices [5].</p>
      <p>The main advantage of the plugin is that no additional steps need to be taken to start 3D-CFD
Simulations out of an existing construction. The user doesn’t have to export CAD-Files to a common
standard, import them to the simulations software, check the results and get back to the CAD Software
to implement modifications if needed. All these steps will be fully integrated into Fusion and the
CAxAddon to support seamless access to 3D-Simulations and the results.</p>
      <p>The API and Plugin for Fusion 360 also enable continuous development to implement additional
features. Also, the Plugin itself is easily adaptable to different CAD Software, like SolidWorks. This is
extremely important for bringing AIDEAS Suites to a wide variety of customers.</p>
      <p>Many different simulations were directly started out of Fusion and were successfully run to
StrömungsRaum(c) to generate virtual machine data, capable of building an AI. The Simulation has
shown no errors or deviations, depending on running directly to the CAx Addon or directly to
StrömungsRaum(c). Therefore, the overall simulation concept is validated and ready to be added with
additional features.</p>
      <p>To fully optimise geometries before building them in real life, the CAx-Addon is adapted to the
Machine Data Generator. Therefore, more complex APIs will be integrated. This will result in the
capability, to directly generate Geometries via Parameters in Fusion 360 and optimize them
automatically via the Machine Data Generator. The idea is to start with a parametric Geometry
defined by the customer. The MDG will then perform an optimization via the Meta-Model out of the
MDG and bring back the parametrization and the step-file to Fusion 360. By using the fully integrated
plugin, the Customer will be able to substantially decrease the construction and optimization time
since nearly everything is done automatically out of the common software. These steps will be
included in the second stage of the project.</p>
      <p>The Plugin can be used for different approaches. The first is a 3D-CFD Simulation for generating
synthetic data, which can be used for an AI-Module or for the customer itself to optimize geometry
in a classic way. The second approach is much more powerful. With the newly developed API and
the respective Plugin, the customer will be able to highly improve the iterative processes in the
construction of spiral distributors in the plastic industry, by saving significant time and money for
construction. Also, this API directly connects to the Meta-Model, bringing in optimizations of such a
construction in less than one hour – saving more than 90% of time and money regarding the classic
way. Since the API is easily adaptable to new challenges, newly generated meta-models for other
industries could be implemented soon – saving resources in time, money, and material all over the
world.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>The approach outlined in WP3 includes a comprehensive methodology for integrating AI into the
design phase of industrial plants. The focus is on developing optimisation modules, synthesising
training data, ensuring compatibility with standard systems, and continuously validating to contribute
to a holistic framework for AI-supported design.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>6. Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>This paper was funded by European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme
under grant agreement No. 101057294, project AIDEAS (AI Driven industrial Equipment product life
cycle boosting Agility, Sustainability, and resilience).</p>
      <p>Declaration on Generative AI</p>
      <sec id="sec-7-1">
        <title>The author(s) have not employed any Generative AI tools.</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>7. References</title>
      <p>[1] H. Becker, D.-I. S. Eimeke und D.-I. M. Dörner, „Vollautomatisierte Verteilerauslegung in der</p>
      <p>Heißkanaltechnik,“ www.kunststoffe.de, p. 67, 9 2023.
[2] H. Ruelmann, M. Geveler, D. Ribbrock, P. Zajac und S. Turek, „Basic Machine Learning
Approaches for the Acceleration of PDE Simulations and Realization in the FEAT3 Software “,
Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, pp. 139,449-457, 2020.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>