<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Kyiv, Ukraine
* Corresponding author.
These authors contributed equally.
savchenko_e@meta.ua (Ye. Savchenko-Syniakova); ksynytsya@irtc.org.ua (K. Synytsya);
m_savchenko@meta.ua (M. Savchenko); auten@ukr.net (V. Otenko); lana_zar@i.ua (S. Zaritskaya)</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Learning Resources Recommendations Taking into Account the Individual s Preferences in Learning Style⋆</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yevheniya Savchenko-Syniakova</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Kateryna Synytsya</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mykhailo Savchenko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Volodymyr Otenko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Svitlana Zaritskaya</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Aurora Geosciences Ltd.</institution>
          <addr-line>, YN</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="CA">Canada</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Institute for Information Technologies and Systems of the NAS of Ukraine</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>000</volume>
      <fpage>0</fpage>
      <lpage>0003</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>An approach to providing recommendations for the selection of learning resources for various learning purposes is proposed, taking into account preferences for learning styles, such as audio, text, etc. A framework for constructing a recommendation system is presented, which enables generating personalized recommendations for students, considering their accumulated learning experience. Incorporating such recommendations when choosing resources can make learning more comfortable, as it allows the selection of materials aligned with individual preferences in presentation.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;e-learning</kwd>
        <kwd>lifelong learning</kwd>
        <kwd>continuous learning</kwd>
        <kwd>recommendation system</kwd>
        <kwd>learning styles</kwd>
        <kwd>recommendations</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The task of preparing learning recommendations is aimed at improving the process of acquiring
knowledge and skills. It can help learners select resources that match both their learning style and
their goals.</p>
      <p>Therefore, the development of a recommendation system capable of automatically generating
suggestions for choosing learning resources, while considering the preferred style of content
presentation, is an urgent and relevant task.</p>
      <p>The purpose of this paper is to propose a methodology for generating recommendations for
selecting learning resources based on learning styles, with the aim of improving the overall
comfort and effectiveness of learning.</p>
      <p>The paper is structured as follows. The first section describes the task of digital learning and the
problems that arise there. The second section describes the task of preparing recommendations for
selecting educational resources. The third section outlines the methodology for generating such
recommendations.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Modern Information Technologies in Education</title>
      <p>
        The movement for open educational resources [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] facilitates the availability of electronic content,
as well as its correction and adaptation in accordance with the CreativeCommon license [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
Adaptation of educational resources to new conditions. The growing number of educational
resources, especially those, and open educational resources, is a main factor in accounting for
individual preferences.
      </p>
      <p>
        The emergence of new technologies has led to the need for continuous updating of knowledge,
acquisition of new skills, and improvement of qualifications [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. Technologies have provided mass
access to educational materials and content, making them convenient to use. The presentation of
educational information in electronic form (text, audio, and video) has ensured its mass use. The
development of computer-based learning technologies allows the replication of the educational
process through access to educational courses for learning
      </p>
      <p>
        Modern technologies allow the creation of multimedia and interactive content even by
individuals without extensive training in this field. For example, teachers use YouTube to deliver
lessons, while H5P enables the quick development of tests and other learning content [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. Such
content can be recombined and shared with others.
      </p>
      <p>The application of recommender systems in education requires considering a wide range of
approaches in recommender systems rely on user-generated data, such as ratings, reviews, and
feedback.</p>
      <p>
        In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], the deployment and experimental evaluation of collaborative filtering algorithms was
carried out using three datasets of performance history collected from first-year students at a
Chilean university. The experiments demonstrated that recommender systems can be a promising
tool not only for predicting student performance but also for assisting learners in the educational
process by recommending meaningful resources.
      </p>
      <p>
        Study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] introduces a teacher recommendation system that provides educators with the most
relevant open educational resources, extracted from collections aligned with the UNESCO
Information and Communication Technology Teacher Competency Framework.
      </p>
      <p>
        The authors of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] argue that recommender systems are especially valuable in online and
blended courses that employ competency-based assessment. These systems can leverage social
knowledge about competency development and student performance. The recommender system
developed by the authors considers experiences accumulated and ranked by former students. To
generate recommendations that support successful learning, it compares the current level of a
Finally, [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] describes the use of machine learning methods to assess the development of
      </p>
      <p>So, today, when a large number of various courses for learning in various fields have been
developed, which can be used both for independent learning and for specialized training, it is very
difficult for a student to navigate in choosing an educational resource, even taking into account the
purpose of his learning. Therefore, building technologies that could help him in this choice is an
important and urgent task today. This study aims to develop a methodology for preparing
recommendations for a student, taking into account a comfortable learning style.</p>
      <p>Let's take a closer look at what educational resources exist today.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Learning Resources for the Learning</title>
      <p>Educational resources can be presented in digital (electronic) and traditional formats, including
electronic textbooks, interactive assignments, educational videos, and audio, presentations,
educational and supportive software, including games and as well as books, reference books, and
other materials used in the educational process.</p>
      <p>The creation of standardized content for use in a variety of learning environments: face-to-face,
blended, and/or virtual, is critical in today's education.</p>
      <p>The learning object approach aims to facilitate the development of small units of content that
can be combined and reused across courses, thereby taking advantage of the development of
educational programs and materials.</p>
      <p>
        According to the IEEE Educational Technology Standards Committee [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], the term "learning
object" is defined as any entity, digital or non-digital, that can be used for teaching, learning, or
training and that can be reused or reused in a technology-supported learning context.
      </p>
      <p>
        A handy tool for creating learning resources is H5P [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. It is an open-source content creation
tool. This tool allows anyone to easily create, distribute, and reuse rich, interactive HTML5 content
such as interactive videos, interactive presentations, quizzes, interactive timelines, and more.
      </p>
      <p>Educational resources are a set of materials, tools, platforms, and services aimed at supporting
and optimizing the learning process. This concept covers both traditional educational and
methodological complexes and innovative digital solutions: from electronic textbooks to adaptive
learning systems and virtual reality. The following gives a summary of all heading levels.</p>
      <p>Choosing the optimal educational resource is a task that requires a systematic approach. With a
huge variety of available platforms, it is easy to get lost or make a choice that does not correspond
to real needs. The key to success is a clear formulation of educational goals and a critical analysis
of the options offered.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Recommendation for Learning Resource Search</title>
      <p>To select the appropriate educational resources from a large volume of offered ones, a
recommendation that could guide the student in choosing educational resources would be very
useful for the student.</p>
      <p>Such a recommendation could be obtained using a recommendation system that, based on the
collected information about the courses and the students who have completed them, would prepare
recommendations for new students, taking into account the situation in which the student selects a
resource for learning. This would allow the student's time to be used more efficiently in choosing a
resource and selecting a resource that best suits the student's needs, which would improve the
quality of the acquired skills or knowledge.</p>
      <p>
        Such a recommendation system can be considered as an advisor that supports decision-making
based on information about the student and their experience in a particular field of knowledge.
Most educational recommendation systems use available information, such as descriptions of
educational resources, student characteristics (age, gender, group, learning style, grades, etc.).
Recommendations from such systems often assume similarities between students within a group,
or similarities in the discipline being studied [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The quality of the recommendations that the recommendation system produces may depend on
the information available about the students and their resources for learning. The more complete
the information is, the more likely it is that the result will be most suitable for the student.</p>
      <p>The situations in which a person who chooses a course for learning may find himself may be
different. The authors conducted a study that showed that four types of situations can be
distinguished in lifelong learning. For each of the situations, different methods and
recommendations can be applied. Let us consider such situations in more detail.</p>
      <p>
        For example, let's consider situations in which the need to select an educational resource arises.
Situations in which students may find themselves when choosing a learning resource for a lifelong
learning case were investigated [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. Several lifelong learning situations related to the selection of
the most appropriate learning resource were identified. These situations are linked to the purpose
of learning.
      </p>
      <p>The authors identified situations based on achieving the following goals:
for professional development: the learner needs a proven learning outcome in a certain area, for
example, in programming. In this case, the resource represents a course or program,
activities, assignments, and assessments leading to confirmation of the learner's
competence (diploma or certificate);
or personal development: the person needs to learn how to perform a task or solve a problem.</p>
      <p>Resource recommendations may include various types of resources for acquiring
knowledge or skills, including microlearning videos;
satisfying one's own curiosity: this may be simply a hobby, a need to clarify details, improve
understanding of something, or simply a desire to keep up with modern technological
advances. Various resources can be recommended here, from educational and entertaining
to scientific research, passive presentations, interactive videos, games, and quizzes;
to consolidate existing skills or refresh knowledge: this is a specific situation that has not yet
been sufficiently studied. This is explained by the fact that, regardless of the subject area,
acquired knowledge degrades over time and requires updating. It may also be necessary to
work on the acquired skills.</p>
      <p>You can also divide the learning process into superficial, when it is enough to repeat an exercise
once or twice, or in-depth, when you need to return to repeating individual fragments or repeating
exercises.</p>
      <p>In addition, each student has preferences for the style of presentation of learning materials. We
will consider this in more detail in the next section.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Application of Different Styles in Learning</title>
      <p>Learning style is usually understood as the preferred way of accepting and processing new
information.</p>
      <p>There are several approaches to describing learning styles. Learning style is understood as a set
of parameters that characterize the method of presenting and perceiving information, the method
of awareness, and cognitive characteristics. Using a preferred style promotes effective assimilation.
There are several models that systematize the characteristics of the learner that determine his or
her learning style.</p>
      <p>
        For example, such as Learning Styles VARK [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ], which focuses on the information presentation
to be consumed as visual, aural, or via text reading.
      </p>
      <p>
        Other learning styles are also known, such as Kolb learning [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ], Herrmann's brain dominance
model [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ], and the Felder-Silverman model [16 19].
      </p>
      <p>The Felder-Silverman (FS) model describes learning preferences as a set of parameters across
four dimensions that characterize the best way the new information is both perceived and
processed. The drawback of the classical FS model comparing to VARK is in separation between
verbal and visual information without further detailization to text or audio presentation.
information processing (sequential vs global).</p>
      <p>The learning styles FS model describes four measurement scales that determine students'
learning preferences: active/reflective, sensory/intuitive, visual/verbal, and sequential/global.</p>
      <p>This model helps teachers adapt teaching methods to different student styles, making the
learning process more comfortable.</p>
      <p>FS model scales:
1 scale. The learning process can be active or reflective, i.e. it is an action, not a reflection.</p>
      <p>Active learners prefer to learn by actively participating in the process, for example, discussing,
working in groups, conducting experiments. Reflective learners prefer to think about information,
analyze it and reflect on it.</p>
      <p>2 scale. Perception in the learning process is divided into sensory or intuitive, which can be
understood as concrete and conceptual, as fact and theory.</p>
      <p>Sensory learners prefer facts and concrete details, while intuitive learners prefer abstract
concepts and connections between them.</p>
      <p>3 scale. Information input is divided into visual or verbal. Images and diagrams are visual
information, reading/writing is verbal.</p>
      <p>Visual learners learn information better when presented in the form of images, diagrams and
charts, while verbal learners prefer written and oral explanations.</p>
      <p>4 scale. Understanding information can be sequential or global. That is, either a step-by-step,
orderly understanding of the material or broad thinking.</p>
      <p>Sequential learners prefer a logical and linear approach to learning, assimilating information
step by step, while global learners prefer to see the big picture and then understand the details.</p>
      <p>Each area can be understood as a separate approach to learning.
learning content and arranging the learning process.</p>
      <p>In group learning and in creation of online courses the diversity of learning styles is usually
addressed though it may lead to unnecessary duplication of information.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Application of the FS Model in Education</title>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>The FS model can be applied in such cases.</title>
        <p>1. To adapt learning materials:</p>
        <p>Teachers can use the model to develop learning materials that suit different learning styles. For
example, more interactive activities can be added for active learners, and more hands-on examples
can be added for sensory learners.</p>
        <p>2. Diversification of teaching methods:</p>
        <p>The model helps to vary the teaching methods to suit the needs of different learners. For
example, lectures, group discussions, practical work, and independent study can be used.
3. Increased student engagement:</p>
        <p>Recognizing and accommodating different learning styles can increase student engagement in
the learning process, as they will feel that their needs are being taken into account.</p>
        <p>The FS model provides a valuable tool for understanding and satisfying different learning styles,
which contributes to a more comfortable and enjoyable learning process.</p>
        <p>It is assumed that the learning style will not change throughout the learning content. However,
informal discussion in the focus group revealed significant changes in the parameters depending
on the learning situation.</p>
        <p>The combination of the parameters (styles) of the FS model forms individual learning
preferences.</p>
        <p>Now it is turn to the methodology for obtaining recommendations using the learning style.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>7. Construction of Recommendation System</title>
      <p>Recently, personalization of information has become a key factor, as it allows the selection of
information taking into account the interests of the user.</p>
      <p>Continuous electronic learning is becoming increasingly popular, as it allows people of different
ages to study in different conditions, both to obtain a diploma and simply to refresh their
knowledge in some subjects. Taking into account the personal preferences of the student can make
learning more comfortable, and there is a greater likelihood of completing the course.</p>
      <p>To select suitable educational resources from a large volume of offered ones, a recommendation
system would be very useful, which, based on the collected information about the courses and
students who have completed them, would prepare recommendations for new students, taking into
account the situation in which the student selects a resource for training. This would allow more
efficient use of the student's time to select a resource and select a resource that best suits the
student's needs, which would improve the quality of the skills or knowledge acquired.</p>
      <p>The quality of recommendations issued by a recommendation system may depend on the
available information about students and learning resources. The more complete the information
is, the more likely it is that the result will be most suitable for the student.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>8. Methodology for Preparing Recommendations</title>
      <p>The task of preparing recommendations during training is aimed at improving the process of
acquiring knowledge and skills. This can help the student select resources for training, considering
the style and purpose of training. Therefore, the development of a recommendation system that
would allow automatic preparation of recommendations for choosing a training resource for a
specific user, taking into account the style of presentation of materials that is comfortable for him,
is a relevant task.</p>
      <p>
        In this study, we consider resources where the author of each of provides their characteristics.
The metadata structure recommended by the standard [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
        ] descriptions of educational resources
is intended primarily for general characteristics (format, duration, language, etc.) Additional
information on whether this resource is suitable for a certain style can be formed separately. Then
this information characterizing this resource can be checked for compliance with the user's request
(template). In addition, if any resource has been tested in a similar situation by a trusted partner
with similar tastes, then his opinion must be taken into account.
      </p>
      <p>Thus, the user receives a recommendation, the reason for which can be known and explained. It
is related to a specific educational situation and, therefore, will help the user get what he would
like with a greater probability.</p>
      <p>This approach can be useful for solving the cold start problem. First, the resources already have
an initial description that is reliable and not specific to the user. It is assumed that users provide
information about their preferences specific to a particular situation, but this information
(template) is independent of the resource. If a complete template is missing, the most important
parameters can be requested separately and processed individually.</p>
      <p>We will assume that the preliminary selection of resources has already been completed and the
resources analyzed for compliance with the style have matched it (meaning the resource topic and
language, and possibly the duration of study, price and other critical characteristics).</p>
      <p>To generate recommendations, information is used both on the properties of the resource and
on the preferences of users. Since the discussion of preferences within our small group showed that
the characteristics of the style depend on the situation - the purpose of study, then we will link the
corresponding user profile to the situation and request confirmation the next time the resource is
requested for a recommendation.</p>
      <p>We propose using individual learning style preferences specific to a particular situation. The
methodology for preparing recommendations involves stages, the sequence of which is shown in
Fig. 1.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>9. Example of preparing recommendations</title>
      <p>Let's consider a small example of how recommendations differ depending on preferences.</p>
      <p>Suppose we have information about 10 courses presented by a certain university.</p>
      <p>Suppose that users who have completed some courses have chosen the following styles
recommendations:
•
•
•</p>
      <sec id="sec-9-1">
        <title>Sveta - Sequential, Reflective, Verbal (txt);</title>
        <p>Kate - Global, Visual, Reflective;
Olha - Active, Visual, Sequential.</p>
        <p>Comments about the courses of users who have already completed them can also be presented.
These comments can be recommendations for new users who are choosing a course for themselves
to study.</p>
        <p>For example, Comments Kate: I liked the recommendation of the resource for repetition,
because it briefly and clearly shows the use of prepositions.</p>
        <p>A new user who forms his preferences about the learning style will be closer to one of the
presented users who have already completed these courses. Then the recommendation system will
prepare recommendations for the new student about three courses, recommended by one of the
recommendations that is closer to the student in terms of learning style.</p>
        <p>This technique will be discussed in more detail with examples in subsequent articles.
10. Discussion</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-9-2">
        <title>This section discusses the key points of the article.</title>
        <p>Although group learning, including distance learning, seeks to address the needs of learners
with different styles whenever possible, it is assumed that the use of resources aligned with an
process an aspect particularly important in lifelong learning.</p>
        <p>The choice of the FS model for describing learning styles is justified by the fact that it accounts
not only for the form of information presentation but also for the ways in which learners engage
with it.</p>
        <p>During the study, the need to adapt the FS model was identified, specifically:
•
•
clarifying the form of verbal information presentation (text or audio);
considering the learning objective (situation) when searching for educational resources.</p>
        <p>
          As the discussion indicates, both the choice of information presentation format and the
preferred learning activities depend on the purpose of accessing a resource. The diversity of
learning situations explains the use of scales to determine the values of individual style parameters.
For example, the standard preference may be verbal (text), but for repetition, a combination of
visual and audio modalities is more effective. Such an interpretation provides richer insights than
relying solely on numerical values [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>The methodology proposed by the authors allows, based on descriptions of a set of resources
provided by developers, offering learners the three most suitable resources that match their
preferred learning style.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>This paper proposes an approach to providing recommendations for selecting educational
resources for various learning objectives, taking into account students' learning style preferences.
A framework for constructing a recommender system has been developed that enables the
generation of personalized recommendations for students based on their accumulated learning
experience. Incorporating such recommendations into resource selection can improve the learning
experience by accommodating students' individual preferences.</p>
      <p>Future research will focus on implementing the proposed recommendation system and testing it
on specific use cases, providing tailored recommendations for various learning purposes.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>During the preparation of this work, the authors have not employed any Generative AI tools.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Open</given-names>
            <surname>Educational</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Resources (OER) Support Equity</article-title>
          and Flexibility,
          <source>last accessed</source>
          <year>2025</year>
          /05/19
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[2] Creative commons</article-title>
          . https://creativecommons.org,
          <source>last accessed</source>
          <year>2025</year>
          /05/05
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <article-title>-Transformation in Learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>Upravlasie sistemy i masiny. 1</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          <lpage>15</lpage>
          . DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/usim.
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <volume>01</volume>
          .003 (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[4] Types of Educational Resources</article-title>
          . https://campus.paho.org/en/types-educational-resources,
          <year>2025</year>
          /06/20
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Torres</surname>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Recommender Systems for Education: A case of Study Using Formative Assessments</article-title>
          , 41st International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society, Santiago, Chile, pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>6</lpage>
          , doi: 10.1109/SCCC57464.
          <year>2022</year>
          .
          <volume>10000363</volume>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dhahri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Khribi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A Review of Educational Recommender Systems for Teachers</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Association for Development of the Information Society</source>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chavarriaga</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Florian-Gaviria</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Solarte</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A Recommender System for Students Based on Social Knowledge and Assessment Data of Competences</article-title>
          . In: Rensing,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>de Freitas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Ley</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Muñoz-Merino</surname>
          </string-name>
          , P.J. (eds)
          <article-title>Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities</article-title>
          .
          <source>EC-TEL 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>8719</volume>
          . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
          <fpage>319</fpage>
          -11200-
          <issue>8</issue>
          _
          <issue>5</issue>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Research on personalized learning recommendation system based on machine learning algorithm</article-title>
          .
          <source>Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience</source>
          ,
          <volume>26</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>432</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>440</lpage>
          . (
          <year>2025</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>IEEE</given-names>
            <surname>Learning Technology Standards</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Committee (LTSC)</article-title>
          . https://sagroups.ieee.org/ltsc,
          <year>2025</year>
          /06/20
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <article-title>Create, share and reuse interactive HTML5 content in your browser</article-title>
          . https://h5p.org/,
          <source>last accessed</source>
          <year>2025</year>
          /01/25
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>[11] Intelligent Systems (TIIS)</source>
          ,
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>26</lpage>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Savchenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Synytsya</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Savchenko-Synyakova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Recommendation Methods for Information Technology Support of Lifelong Learning Situations</article-title>
          . In: Faure,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Danchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Bondarenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Tryus</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Bazilo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Zaspa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>G</surname>
          </string-name>
          . (eds).
          <source>Information Technology for Education, Science, and Technics. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies</source>
          , vol
          <volume>178</volume>
          . Cham: Springer, pp.
          <fpage>552</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>564</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
          <fpage>031</fpage>
          -35467-0_
          <fpage>33</fpage>
          (
          <year>2023</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Othman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Amiruddin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Different perspectives of learning styles from VARK model</article-title>
          .
          <source>Procedia-Socialand Behavioral Sciences, 7</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>652</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>660</lpage>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kolb</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>David A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>The Kolb learning style inventory</article-title>
          . Boston, MA: Hay Resources Direct (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15] style.
          <source>Tbtea Journal</source>
          ,
          <volume>156</volume>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Graf</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Viola</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <article-title>Kinshuk. In-depth analysis of the Felder-Silverman learning style dimensions</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Research on Technology in Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>79</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>93</lpage>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nafea</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Siewe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>He</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>On recommendation of learning objects using Felder-Silverman learning style model</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Access</source>
          ,
          <volume>7</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>163034</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>163048</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/ACCESS.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <volume>2935417</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fida</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ghaffar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Learning Styles: An Overview of the FelderMeasure</article-title>
          .
          <source>Int. J. Innov. Teach. Learn</source>
          ,
          <volume>1</volume>
          . (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zagulova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Boltunova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Katalnikova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Prokofyeva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Synytsya</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Personalized ELearning: Relation Between</surname>
          </string-name>
          Felder-Silverman
          <source>Model and Academic Performance. Appl. Comput. Syst.</source>
          ,
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>25</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>31</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2019-
          <volume>0004</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <surname>McClelland</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Metadata standards for educational resources</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computer</source>
          ,
          <volume>36</volume>
          (
          <issue>11</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>107</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>109</lpage>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pashler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>McDaniel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rohrer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bjork</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Learning styles: Concepts and evidence</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychological science in the public interest</source>
          ,
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>105</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>119</lpage>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>