<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>K. Radchenko);</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Application of Wavelet Neural Networks for Predicting Anomalous Traffic on a Web Server</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Kostiantyn Radchenko</string-name>
          <email>radchenko.kostiantyn@lll.kpi.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ihor Tereykovskyi</string-name>
          <email>tereikovskyi.ihor@lll.kpi.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Prospect Beresteiskyi 37, 03056 Kyiv</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>000</volume>
      <fpage>0</fpage>
      <lpage>0003</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>In the era of rapidly increasing web traffic and growing cybersecurity threats, effective prediction of server load and timely detection of anomalies play a crucial role in ensuring the reliability and security of web infrastructures. Traditional forecasting methods, such as ARIMA and exponential smoothing, often fail to capture short-term spikes and anomalies in traffic behavior, especially during cyberattacks like DDoS. Neural networks, particularly Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models, demonstrate improved accuracy in time series forecasting but remain sensitive to noisy data. This paper proposes the application of Wavelet Neural Networks (WNN) for predicting anomalous traffic on web servers. Wavelet decomposition is employed to separate traffic into low- and high-frequency components, enabling the detection of both long-term trends and short-term fluctuations. The WNN model is trained on preprocessed server log data and evaluated using standard error metrics for forecasting, as well as precision, recall, and F1-score for anomaly detection. Experimental results show that WNN outperforms traditional methods and standalone LSTM models in capturing short-term spikes and improving anomaly detection accuracy. The findings highlight the potential of integrating WNN into real-time monitoring and cybersecurity systems, enhancing the resilience of web servers against cyber threats and ensuring more efficient resource allocation.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Wavelet Neural Networks</kwd>
        <kwd>web server load prediction</kwd>
        <kwd>anomalous traffic detection</kwd>
        <kwd>discrete wavelet transform</kwd>
        <kwd>cybersecurity</kwd>
        <kwd>DDoS attack prevention</kwd>
        <kwd>time series forecasting</kwd>
        <kwd>hybrid models</kwd>
        <kwd>anomaly detection</kwd>
        <kwd>web traffic analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>1</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>In modern information systems, web servers are key components that handle massive volumes of
user traffic. The growth in the number of users and the proliferation of cyberattacks, such as DDoS
or application-layer attacks, create the need for developing methods of load prediction and
anomaly detection. Traffic forecasting not only enables the optimization of server resources but
also enhances their resilience to attacks and helps prevent service disruptions.</p>
      <p>The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the effectiveness of WNN in predicting anomalous
traffic on web servers. The main objectives are: to review current methods of forecasting and
anomaly detection, to justify the use of wavelet transforms for traffic analysis, to develop a
WNNbased model, and to conduct its experimental validation on real or synthetic data.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Literature Review</title>
      <p>
        The problem of predicting web server load and detecting abnormal traffic has been actively studied
within the fields of computer networks and cybersecurity. Traditional time series analysis methods,
such as AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and exponential smoothing, have
been widely applied for modeling network traffic due to their ability to capture seasonality and
short-term dependencies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. However, these approaches demonstrate limited performance in
highly dynamic environments where sudden spikes, anomalies, or nonlinear behaviors occur,
which are typical characteristics of modern web traffic [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        With the growing complexity of traffic patterns, machine learning and deep learning methods
have become increasingly popular. Neural architectures such as LSTM and Gated Recurrent Units
(GRU) have shown strong capabilities in capturing long-term dependencies and nonlinear
correlations in sequential data [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref7">3, 7</xref>
        ]. Studies indicate that LSTM-based models outperform classical
statistical methods in forecasting traffic volumes and identifying anomalies in time series [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref5">5, 12</xref>
        ].
Nevertheless, these models often suffer from sensitivity to noise, high computational costs, and
challenges in real-time deployment [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        To overcome these limitations, researchers have increasingly employed wavelet transform (WT)
techniques for traffic analysis. Wavelets enable multi-resolution decomposition, allowing
simultaneous analysis of both low-frequency trends and high-frequency fluctuations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. Discrete
Wavelet Transform (DWT) has been successfully used for traffic denoising, feature extraction, and
anomaly detection [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref9">1, 9</xref>
        ]. Depending on the wavelet basis (Haar, Daubechies, Symlet, etc.), different
trade-offs between time localization and frequency resolution can be achieved, which is
particularly useful for detecting traffic irregularities [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref9">9, 11</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        A promising direction has been the integration of wavelet analysis with neural network
architectures, forming WNN. These hybrid models combine the feature extraction capability of
wavelets with the nonlinear approximation power of neural networks [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. Recent studies report
that WNN can achieve higher accuracy in forecasting and anomaly detection compared to
standalone statistical or deep learning models [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref6">6, 10</xref>
        ]. However, challenges remain in selecting the
optimal wavelet function, decomposition level, and ensuring computational efficiency for real-time
cybersecurity applications.
      </p>
      <p>
        Authors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ] proposed a conceptual model for web server load forecasting, which provides a
structured basis for developing predictive systems in distributed environments. Researchers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ]
investigated the preprocessing of time series using DWT for stock price prediction, showing that
wavelet-based decomposition enhances the performance of neural networks on noisy and
nonstationary data. Building on this, [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ] developed an integrated WNN model for web server load
forecasting, demonstrating improved predictive accuracy and robustness compared to classical
methods. These works highlight the potential of wavelet–neural integration as a foundation for
future cybersecurity-oriented monitoring and forecasting systems.
      </p>
      <p>So, this hybrid methodology addresses both the multi-scale nature of web server load and the
nonlinear dependencies within traffic data, making it a strong candidate for enhancing
cybersecurity monitoring systems.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Methodology</title>
      <p>The experimental data for this study were obtained from two primary sources: (i) real-world web
server logs, collected over a specified observation period, and (ii) synthetic datasets generated to
simulate controlled traffic patterns under varying load conditions. The use of both data sources
ensures the robustness of the proposed approach by allowing validation under realistic as well as
experimental scenarios.</p>
      <p>Prior to modeling, the data underwent preprocessing. This included (a) removal of incomplete
or corrupted log entries, (b) normalization of traffic indicators to a uniform scale, and (c)
application of filtering techniques to minimize the impact of random noise. The key performance
indicators (KPIs) used for analysis were:


</p>
      <p>Requests per Second (RPS) – measuring the intensity of incoming traffic;
Round-Trip Time (RTT) – reflecting the latency between request initiation and response
delivery;</p>
      <p>Number of Active Sessions – capturing concurrent user activity.</p>
      <p>These metrics serve as fundamental inputs for both forecasting and anomaly detection tasks.</p>
      <p>To enhance feature extraction from non-stationary traffic data, the DWT was applied. Several
families of wavelets were considered, including Haar, Daubechies, and Symlet, each offering
distinct trade-offs in terms of orthogonality, compactness, and similarity to the analyzed signal.</p>
      <p>The DWT decomposes the input time series into approximation and detail coefficients, enabling
the separation of low-frequency trends (representing long-term traffic patterns) and
highfrequency fluctuations (capturing sudden bursts or anomalies). This multi-resolution
representation ensures that both short-term irregularities and long-term dynamics are preserved
for subsequent analysis.</p>
      <p>The forecasting model was designed as a WNN, in which the wavelet coefficients served as
inputs. The network architecture consisted of:



an input layer that receives transformed coefficients from the DWT;
one or more hidden layers responsible for nonlinear mapping between wavelet features and
load dynamics;
an output layer that produces the predicted web server load in terms of RPS, RTT, or active
sessions.</p>
      <p>The training process utilized a combination of traditional backpropagation and hybrid learning
strategies to improve convergence speed and reduce overfitting. Activation functions such as
sigmoid and ReLU were employed depending on the layer’s role in feature transformation.</p>
      <p>Figure 1 illustrates the overall methodology of the proposed approach, depicting the sequential
flow from data collection and preprocessing, through wavelet-based feature extraction, to
forecasting with a WNN and integrated anomaly detection.</p>
      <p>In addition to forecasting, the model was integrated with an anomaly detection mechanism to
enhance cybersecurity monitoring. The predicted traffic patterns were compared against the actual
observed values. Significant deviations were treated as potential anomalies, possibly indicating
cyberattacks, DDoS activity, or unexpected user behavior.</p>
      <p>Anomalies were identified based on two key criteria:


threshold-based rules, where deviations beyond predefined tolerance levels triggered alerts;
statistical deviation analysis, where outliers were detected using variance and confidence
interval calculations.</p>
      <p>This integration ensured that the WNN not only provided reliable forecasts of web server load
but also contributed to the early detection of anomalous and potentially malicious activity.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Experimental Study</title>
      <p>The experimental evaluation was conducted to validate the proposed WNN methodology for web
server load forecasting and anomaly detection. The experiments focused on assessing both the
accuracy of predictions and the effectiveness of anomaly identification under realistic and extreme
traffic scenarios.</p>
      <p>The primary data source consisted of real web server log files, capturing a wide range of load
conditions including daily usage variations, peak hours, and sudden bursts. To further stress-test
the model, synthetic attack scenarios were simulated, including distributed denial-of-service
(DDoS) events and sudden peak traffic spikes. These scenarios allowed evaluation of the model’s
adaptability and robustness, ensuring that both normal and abnormal traffic patterns were
accurately represented.</p>
      <p>The WNN architecture was configured with carefully selected hyperparameters. This included
the number of hidden layers, the number of neurons per layer, and learning rates optimized for
convergence and stability. Different wavelet types (Haar, Daubechies, Symlet) and decomposition
levels were systematically tested to identify the configuration that best captured multi-scale traffic
features while minimizing information loss.</p>
      <p>Forecasting performance was measured using standard regression metrics: Mean Absolute Error
(MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). For
anomaly detection, classification-oriented metrics were employed: Precision, Recall, and F1-score.
Together, these metrics provide a comprehensive evaluation of the model’s ability to both predict
future load and detect abnormal events effectively.</p>
      <p>The experimental evaluation shows that the proposed WNN model achieved a MAE of 0.086, a
RMSE of 0.112, and a MAPE of 4.7% for load forecasting. For anomaly detection, the model reached
a Precision of 0.91, a Recall of 0.88, and an F1-score of 0.895, indicating high reliability in
identifying abnormal traffic events under various load scenarios.</p>
      <p>The experimental results demonstrated that the WNN model closely matched predicted traffic
with actual server load, as visualized in time-series plots comparing forecasted and observed values
(see Figure 2). High-frequency fluctuations and sudden traffic spikes were effectively captured
through wavelet decomposition, improving forecasting reliability. The anomaly detection
mechanism successfully identified abnormal patterns, including simulated DDoS attacks, achieving
higher precision and recall compared to baseline models such as standard LSTM networks or
classical statistical methods. These findings confirm that the integration of wavelet preprocessing
with neural network forecasting not only enhances prediction accuracy but also provides a
proactive mechanism for cybersecurity monitoring.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Discussion</title>
      <p>The experimental results highlight several advantages of using WNN for web server load
forecasting and anomaly detection. By combining wavelet-based feature extraction with neural
network learning, the WNN model is capable of capturing both long-term trends and short-term
fluctuations in server traffic. This multi-resolution capability allows the model to detect subtle
anomalies that may be overlooked by conventional forecasting techniques, providing a proactive
approach to cybersecurity monitoring. Additionally, the integration of wavelet decomposition
helps reduce noise in the data, improving the overall stability and accuracy of predictions. Despite
these benefits, the proposed approach has certain limitations. The WNN requires a substantial
volume of historical data to achieve reliable forecasting performance, which may pose challenges
for new servers or systems with limited logging history. Furthermore, the model’s accuracy is
sensitive to the selection of wavelet type and decomposition level, necessitating careful parameter
tuning. Inappropriate choices can lead to underfitting or overfitting, reducing the effectiveness of
both forecasting and anomaly detection.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study demonstrates the effectiveness of WNN for forecasting web server load and detecting
anomalies in traffic patterns. By leveraging wavelet decomposition, the model successfully captures
both long-term trends and short-term fluctuations, enabling accurate predictions even under
complex and variable load conditions. The experimental results show that the WNN approach
outperforms traditional methods, such as LSTM-only networks, ARIMA, and classical statistical
techniques, particularly in identifying sudden spikes and abnormal traffic events.</p>
      <p>The findings also provide practical recommendations for integration into cybersecurity systems.
Embedding the WNN-based framework within real-time monitoring platforms can enhance threat
detection, provide early warnings for potential attacks, and support adaptive load management.
Organizations managing large-scale web services can benefit from predictive insights to improve
operational efficiency, minimize downtime, and maintain high-quality service delivery.</p>
      <p>So, hybrid models combining WNN and LSTM networks could improve the capture of complex
temporal dependencies while retaining the multi-resolution analysis benefits of wavelets. Real-time
implementation of such models would allow immediate anomaly detection and adaptive traffic
management. Additionally, incorporating automated parameter tuning for wavelet selection and
decomposition levels could reduce reliance on expert intervention, making the methodology more
scalable and widely applicable.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the academic advisors and colleagues
from Department of System Programming and Specialized Computer Systems at National
Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" for their valuable
feedback and constructive suggestions throughout the preparation of this research.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Declaration on Generative AI</title>
      <p>During the preparation of this work, the authors used GPT-4 to check grammar and spelling. After
using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes full responsibility
for the publication’s content.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Abry</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Veitch</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Wavelet analysis of long-range dependent traffic</article-title>
          .
          <source>" IEEE Transactions on Information Theory</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>44</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>1</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>2</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>15</lpage>
          ,
          <year>1998</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/18.650984
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. E. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Box</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Jenkins</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Reinsel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Ljung</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control</source>
          , 5th ed. Wiley,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Chung</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Gulcehre</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Cho</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Bengio</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling." arXiv preprint</article-title>
          ,
          <source>arXiv:1412.3555</source>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Daubechies</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Ten Lectures on Wavelets. SIAM</source>
          ,
          <year>1992</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Du</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Zheng</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Srikumar</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"DeepLog: Anomaly detection and diagnosis from system logs through deep learning."</article-title>
          <source>in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS '17)</source>
          , ACM,
          <year>2017</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1285</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1298</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1145/3133956.3134015.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. O.</given-names>
            <surname>Seman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Aquino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Stefenon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>K.-C. Yow</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mariani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. dos Santos</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Coelho</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Simultaneously anomaly detection and forecasting for predictive maintenance using a zerocost differentiable architecture search-based network." Computers &amp; Industrial Engineering</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>208</volume>
          ,
          <issue>111412</issue>
          ,
          <year>2025</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.cie.
          <year>2025</year>
          .
          <volume>111412</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Hochreiter</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Schmidhuber</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Long short-term memory</article-title>
          .
          <source>" Neural Computation</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>9</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>8</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1735</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1780</lpage>
          ,
          <year>1997</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1162/neco.
          <year>1997</year>
          .
          <volume>9</volume>
          .8.1735.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Papagiannaki</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S. Moon,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Fraleigh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Thiran</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Diot</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Measurement and analysis of singlehop delay on an IP backbone network."</article-title>
          <source>IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>21</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>6</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>908</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>921</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/JSAC.
          <year>2003</year>
          .
          <volume>814410</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. B.</given-names>
            <surname>Percival</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Walden</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Wavelet Methods for Time Series Analysis</source>
          . Cambridge University Press,
          <year>2000</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Du</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L. Ma,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.-Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Sun</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Network traffic anomaly detection based on wavelet analysis."</article-title>
          <source>in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA)</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>94</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>101</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          , doi:10.1109/SERA.
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <volume>8477230</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , A. Benveniste. “
          <source>Wavelet networks." IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>3</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>6</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>889</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>898</lpage>
          ,
          <year>1992</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/72.165591.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Abbasi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Shahraki</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Taherkordi</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Deep learning for network traffic monitoring and analysis (NTMA): A survey."</article-title>
          <source>Computer Communications</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>170</volume>
          , pp.
          <fpage>19</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>41</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.comcom.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>01</volume>
          .021.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Dychka</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Radchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Tereikovskyi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Tereikovska</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Conceptual model of the forecasting process on web server load." Computer-Integrated Technologies: Education, Science</article-title>
          , Production, no.
          <issue>54</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>74</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>83</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2024</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .36910/
          <fpage>6775</fpage>
          -2524-
          <fpage>0560</fpage>
          -2024-54-09.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Radchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Romanenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Stock price prediction using wavelet transform and neural networks." Computer-Integrated Technologies: Education, Science</article-title>
          , Production, no.
          <issue>56</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>261</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>268</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2024</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .36910/
          <fpage>6775</fpage>
          -2524-
          <fpage>0560</fpage>
          -2024-56-33.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Radchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Tereikovskyi.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>"Integrated neural network and wavelet-based model for web server load forecasting." SISIOT (Security of Infocommunication Systems and Internet of Things)</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>2</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>2</issue>
          , p.
          <year>02006</year>
          , Dec.
          <year>2024</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .31861/sisiot2024.2.
          <year>02006</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>