The main purpose behind the design of this experience is the idea of obtaining useful information to know how the online courses in our University have been developed, and trying to understand the process from planning to completion. With this information we intend to provide teachers involved in our research reports that reflect what happened and offer proposals for improvement for future editions of their courses, and at the same time mapping, modelling, testing and validating a model of curriculum analysis useful to teachers and designers to enable them to plan and work in on-line courses at the level of Higher Education.
With this work we intend to enter more profoundly into a line of research that has proved of great interest both nationally and internationally: the study of the processes of implementing new technologies in the context of the higher education curriculum, attempting to design and test a model to analyse the e-learning curriculum.
Until now, research focused on e-learning and on curriculum, has beeen carried out
seperately. On one hand there are several classic studies which have explored the
elements of curriculum in education
In all these studies the elements of curriculum are analyzed within the context of traditional education (face to face in the same place). Some of these studies use ICT as a resource to teach. Only in a few more recent pieces of research do they analyse elearning from the pedagogical point of view. Unfortunately, in this literature there does not exist an origional study on e-learning in the curriculum as a whole, as a concept complete and complex. Consequently, professionals who are working in elearning at universities (teachers, tutors, managers, designers) do not posess sufficient skills to design, develop, analyse and evaluate e-learning actions effectively. And this is a very serious problem, especially if we take into mind that the majority of these people are not educationalists.
Consequently, our proposal is to examine this issue in depth, starting from the understanding of the evolution of curricular models used in online courses in our university (The University of Murcia, in Spain), and at the same time considering the issue more generally, while validating a theoretical and practical model of analysis of curriculum development in online courses.
Our research starts with several fundamental questions: - How are normal teachers, with or without previous pedagogical training, in traditional universities developing curriculum for online courses? - Is it possible to recognize, understand and model the key factors which have evolved in the curriculum development of every on-line course in higher education? - Is it possible to map these factors efficiently in a model of curriculum development?
To attempt to answer these questions, we have proposed educational research based on our experience at the University of Murcia and focused specifically on certain objectives: ·
Recognizing and analysing which model of curriculum development is behind each online course offered by the University of Murcia in the year 2004-2005 (the pilot experience) as well as in the year 2007-2008. · o Describing and understanding the planning as well as the decision taking processes of each teacher in the curriculum of their online courses o Analysing and exploring how students work in each course with these models, and how they use the online tools proposed by teachers o Contrasting the incidence of diverse curricular planning elements in the normal functioning of each course and in the participants’ level of satisfaction, as well as in the results of them. o Analysing, where possible, how each course has changed each year in terms of planning. o Clearly formulating some useful proposals for improvement for teachers and for the University, in order to be able to take further decisions both about online courses and university curriculums. o Proposing, at the same time, key factors to improve the online tools used in the University of Murcia.
Designing and testing a model of curriculum analysis which could provide useful support to teachers in order to plan as well as evaluate online courses at different levels of virtuality.
The main purpose behind the design of this experience is the idea of obtaining useful information to know how the online courses in our University have been developed and trying to understand the process from planning to completion. In the end we intend to analyze how different factors affect planning and curriculum development in different contexts, scientific fields, at fundamental levels, organizational models in different centres (faculties, departments), and obviously, with a large variety of students.
In addition to this ultimate goal, we intend also to provide teachers involved in our research reports that reflect what occured and in addition offer proposals for improvement for future editions of their courses.
Based on the above mentioned, we understand the paradigm of research that
underlies our research project is the qualitative paradigm, and therefore responds to
the main features mentioned by Cuba and Lincoln, (1982, 1983) and expounded by
In the same way as has been explained in the previous point, but trying to achieve greater manageability of data, we opted for a mixed methodology. We have tried to combine tools for collecting qualitative and quantitative information in order to achieve greater and better data complementarity.
For this study we designed a very ambitious model of analysis. We have made an assessment at three moments (initial, process and final), and we have centred it on three different focuses:
The first is the focus on the teacher and the teaching role. The second is the student and the learner roles and functions. These both include the relationship they have with the level of people and learning: Cognitive Interactivity (Prendes, 1995) and relationships between content–people and environment-people: Instrumental interactivity. Finally, the third focus is on the on-line information: contents, resources, and coherence between plan, used materials and methods.
To appropriately analyze these three focuses we use a model based on four dimensions or cross axis: planning, flexibility, interactivity and virtuality; and we have analyzed 7 of the curriculum models on each course across these four dimensions:
We are analysing “naturalistic” courses. The research team didn’t have any control over teachers or students motivating or addressing the information or the choice of the people. They only followed our instructions on how to recover the information.
As we have previously said, in the first year (2004-2005) we analysed 15 courses, 18 teachers and more than 200 students. In this year (2007-2008) we have been analyzing 21 courses, the same number of teachers and more than 300 students.