<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Is gasoline the best fuel for advanced diesel engines? - Fuel effects in “premixed- enough” compression ignition (CI) engines</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gautam Kalghatgi</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Shell Global Solutions</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>In diesel engines exhaust particulates and NOx can be controlled by promoting premixing of the fuel with air and combustion at a low temperature. However, conventional diesel fuel is very prone to auto-ignition and will ignite soon after injection starts, before the fuel and air have had a chance to mix. Indeed most of the advanced technology used in diesel combustion systems is aimed at countering the low ignition delay of diesel fuel either by slowing down the chemistry or by enhancing mixing. Even then low-smoke, low-NOx combustion is only possible at low loads. Engine experiments show that fuels that are more resistant to autoignition, such as gasoline, improve such combustion processes very significantly. These findings have important implications for fuels for future CI engines</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>We define diesel fuels here only in terms of their
auto-ignition quality, as those with Cetane Number
(CN) &gt; ~ 30 and gasoline fuels as those with CN &lt;
~30 or Research Octane Number (RON) &gt; ~ 60
[1]. In practice, diesel fuels are significantly less
volatile than gasoline fuels [1]. Auto-ignition is
determined by chemical kinetics [2], which depend on
the pressure and temperature development,
mixture strength and chemical composition of the fuel.
Typical, practical diesel fuels have CN &gt; ~40 and
will auto-ignite very quickly before the fuel and air
are mixed sufficiently. If the mixing is accelerated
or if the chemical reaction is slowed down,
autoignition can be made to occur after the fuel and air
are better mixed and soot levels can be reduced.
NOx levels can be reduced by reducing
combustion temperature by either running lean, pre-mixed
or using EGR, exhaust gas recirculation.</p>
      <p>Several operating strategies have been
employed to promote pre-mixed and low-temperature
combustion in CI engines. In homogeneous-charge
compression-ignition (HCCI) the fuel and air are
fully premixed as in a spark ignition engine and
compressed till the charge auto-ignites. In modern
direct-injection (DI) diesel engines with common
rail injection systems, HCCI combustion can be
obtained by injecting the diesel fuel very early in
the cycle, giving it enough time to mix completely
with air. However, with HCCI, there is no in-cycle
control over the phasing of the heat release, which
will be determined by the initial conditions of the
mixture at the start of the compression stroke and
the auto-ignition characteristics of the fuel. Hence
HCCI combustion is very difficult to control.
Practical CI engines always need fuel injection near
top-dead-centre (TDC) to control combustion
phasing.</p>
      <p>However, when a conventional diesel fuel is
injected near TDC, it ignites very soon after injection
starts. Most of the fuel at higher loads is injected
after the start of combustion and burns in a
diffusion flame. In fact, most of the high technology
used in advanced diesel engines, which makes
them complicated and expensive, is required by
the necessity to overcome the propensity of diesel
fuel to auto-ignite easily in order to promote
premixed combustion. Thus high injection pressures
and high swirl are used to increase mixing rates
while high levels of cooled EGR are used to delay
combustion; this in turn requires higher boost
pressures to achieve the required loads. Even
then, with conventional diesel fuels, low NOx and
low smoke with partially premixed CI combustion is
possible only at low loads. Modern engines now
require after-treatment systems to further reduce
NOx and particulates, making them even more
complicated and expensive.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Running a diesel engine on a gasoline fuel</title>
      <p>Fuel auto-ignition quality effects on partially
premixed diesel combustion have recently been
studied in two different single cylinder research
engines – one with a displacement of 2 litres [3,4]
and a compression ratio (CR) of 14 and another
with a displacement of 0.54 litres and CR of 16 [5].</p>
      <p>Both these engines could be run on gasoline-like
fuels. If gasoline is injected near (but before) TDC,
it ignites much later than diesel fuel and
combustion occurs when fuel and air have had more
chance to mix [3,4,5]. If the same amount of
gasoline is injected early at the same conditions i.e.
with fully premixed, HCCI conditions, ignition might
not occur at all. Thus the inhomogeneity is essen- RON gasoline. However, for gasoline, even at
tial for combustion to occur but the high ignition around 12 bar IMEP, FSN is below 0.1 (Figure 3).
delay makes combustion happen when fuel and air Increasing the EGR level to ~41% brings down the
are better mixed – fuel and air are “premixed NOx significantly for gasoline without really
inenough‖ but must not be fully premixed. This mix- creasing the smoke. Of course such an increase in
ture stratification, which enables control of the EGR level would increase smoke even above the
phasing of combustion through injection timing, is levels shown in Figure 3 for diesel fuel.
easily achieved simply by relatively late (compared
to HCCI) injection. Much higher loads can be
achieved at low smoke and NOx levels with
gasoline compared to diesel while retaining control over
combustion.
At low loads, when the global mixture strength is
lean, the higher the ignition delay, the leaner are
the mixture packets where heat release occurs by
auto-ignition and NOx is reduced very significantly
[3,5] and the maximum heat release rate and
hence the maximum pressure rise rate are also
reduced [5]. This is illustrated in Figure 1, where
Indicated Specific NOx (ISNOx) and Maximum
Pressure Rise Rate (MPRR, open symbols) are
both plotted against IMEP for a European Diesel
fuel of 56 CN (Cetane Number) and a gasoline of
84 RON. The engine was running at 1200 RPM
without any EGR and the injection timing was
varied – further details about the operating conditions
can be found in [5].</p>
      <p>Specific fuel consumption is the same for
gasoline as for diesel fuel if the combustion
phasFig. 1: ISNOx and MPRR vs IMEP for 84 RON gasoline ing is kept the same [3,4,5]. However, HC and CO
a1n2d0d0ieRsPelMfu,enlofoErGthRe, snaombeooesntg,i6n5e0obpaerraintjiencgticoonnpdriteiosn-. are higher [3,4,5], as expected for a more
presure. From Fig.s 5 &amp; 6 in [5] mixed combustion in an overall lean or dilute
mixture, and would need to be controlled by exhaust
As load is increased, NOx goes up even for gaso- gas after-treatment. Also, at higher loads, as the
line but, unlike with the diesel fuel, NOx can be overall mixture strength becomes richer, a more
reduced using EGR without really increasing the premixed burning regime will result in higher heat
smoke. This is illustrated in Figures 2 and 3 where release and hence, higher pressure rise rates
ISNOx and FSN smoke are plotted respectively [3,4,5]. This can be alleviated by using multiple
against IMEP for the diesel fuel and a gasoline of injections [4,5]. This is usually not possible with
95 RON. In these tests the engine speed was 2000 diesel fuel - double injection makes smoke and
RPM, the intake pressure was 2 bar abs. and the efficiency worse because, the first, early injection
load was varied while holding the EGR level and releases heat during the compression stroke [4].
the combustion phasing fixed. As IMEP is in- Also with gasoline, provision has to be made for
creased, exhaust CO2 concentration increases and starting the engine, probably via a spark plug.
so does the intake CO2 level, and ISNOx
decreases. With ~32% EGR the reduction in ISNOx
with IMEP is similar for both the diesel fuel and 95
whether diesel fuel should be replaced by
gasoFurther Work Required line. Thus should the minimum cetane specification</p>
      <p>Thus the fuel needs to be as much like gaso- for diesel fuel be raised in those areas where it is
line as possible if the aim is to promote premixed currently low (e.g. U.S.) compared to Europe? If
combustion i.e. increase engine ignition delay in CI future engines are designed to promote premixed
engines in order to control smoke and NOx. The combustion, higher fuel cetane number will
cerextent to which this is possible in practice depends tainly not help; it might hinder such operation. On
on whether other critical requirements for a practi- the other hand if the strategy used to control
cal engine such as good transient and low-speed smoke and NOx at high loads is to promote (low
operation, low noise, low emissions and low cost temperature) diffusion combustion and use
excan be met. The engine needs to start and run at haust after treatment, higher cetane might help in
low loads satisfactorily. A CI engine operating on reducing HC and CO emissions. Of course, other
gasoline through the entire range is conceivable. diesel quality issues such as sulphur and volatility
Such an engine could be started by using spark levels and other compositional issues are also
ignition or a powerful glow plug, run with a single important in the debate about future fuel
requireinjection pulse near but before TDC at low and ments. These will eventually have to be agreed by
moderate loads. At high loads the fuelling rate the different stakeholders such as the auto and oil
would be increased by additional injection pulses industries, governments and regulatory bodies and
in the cycle. The engine will need to have an oxi- environmental interests.
dation catalyst to control HC and CO emissions
and a turbocharger or a supercharger. Such an In the long term, fuels much more like today’s
engine would be very similar to HCCI / SI prototype gasoline rather than today’s diesel fuel could be
engines that have been announced by GM and used in CI engines to great advantage. Hence
Mercedes-Benz. Those engines use gasoline, are components normally considered for blending fuels
started using a spark plug, run in HCCI mode at for SI engines, including biofuels like ethanol,
low load with early fuel injection and switch to SI could be used to make fuels for CI engines. Indeed
combustion at high load though they could run in the optimum fuel for such combustion systems
CI mode at high loads as well by injecting fuel near could have a lower octane number and lower
volabut before TDC. There might also be scope for tility (higher full boiling point) compared to today’s
improving the efficiency of the transmission system gasolines. Such a fuel would maintain the
advanfor light-duty applications by reducing the average tage over diesel fuel while easing low load, high
speed since gasoline allows higher loads to be speed and high EGR operation. It might also take
reached at any given speed with low NOx and low less energy to manufacture such low octane fuel. If
smoke compared to diesel fuel. such a fuel is to constitute the majority of refinery</p>
      <p>The experiments using gasoline have so far output—as a majority of the engines would be CI
been done with a standard diesel injector. Small engines because of their higher efficiency—the
injector holes and high injection pressures are consequences for fuel manufacturing, energy
balneeded for diesel fuel in order to increase mixing ances and well-to-wheel greenhouse gas
emisrates to counter the low ignition delay. These are sions need to be understood.
probably not necessary for gasoline fuels with high
ignition delay. There should be further scope for References
optimization of this type of combustion through [1] Kalghatgi, G.T., ―Auto-ignition quality of practical
injector design and optimizing injector strategies. fuels and implications for fuel requirements of future
There is a lot of scope for cost saving if lower injec- SI and HCCI engines‖ SAE 2005-01-0239, 2005.
tion pressures could be used. The relative impor- [2] Westbrook, C.K., ―Chemical kinetics of hydrocarbon
tance of fuel volatility, composition (e.g. aromatic
iinggnistioonftihnepCraocmticbaulsctioomnbInussttiitountes,yvsotle.2m8s,‖p,pPr1o5c6e3e-dcontent) and auto-ignition quality in such combus- 1577, 2000
tion systems needs to be studied further. However [3] Kalghatgi, G. Risberg, P., and Ångström H-E, ―
Adresults so far suggest that auto-ignition quality is vantages of fuels with high resistance to auto-ignition
by far the most important parameter. in late-injection, low-temperature, compression
ignition combustion‖, SAE 2006-01-3385, 2006
[4] Kalghatgi, G. Risberg, P., and Ångström H-E,
―Partially pre-mixed auto-ignition of gasoline to attain low
smoke and low NOx at high load in a compression
ignition engine and comparison with a diesel fuel‖,</p>
      <p>SAE 2007-01-006, 2007
[5] Kalghatgi, G., Hildingsson, L. and Johansson, B.,
―Low NOx and Low Smoke Operation of a Diesel
Engine using Gasoline-like Fuels ―, ASME Paper #
ICES2009-76034</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Implications</title>
      <p>There has been much investment made in
developing the engine and after-treatment technology
using conventional diesel fuel. Hence, in the short
term (&lt; 10 years), conventional diesel fuel (CN &gt;
40) will continue to be used in CI engines. The
practical debate on fuel auto-ignition quality in CI
engines is about whether future engines will
require higher cetane in the 40 to 60 range, not</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>