<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Experimental Analysis of the effect of very early pilot injection on pollutant formation for a PCCI Diesel engine</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>A. Vanegas, N. Peters Institut für Technische Verbrennung RWTH Aachen University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Aachen</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>In the present work, the influence of a very early pilot injection on pollutant formation was investigated in a Common-Rail DI Diesel engine. The engine was operated at conventional part-load conditions at 2000 rpm, an EGR variation was done and the injected fuel mass was 15 mm^3/cycle. The Nozzle type were conical and flow optimized geometries (ks nozzle) with hole diameters of 0.141 mm, length of hole of 1mm and the Spray Cone Angles were 148° and 120°</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Experimental Setup and Measurement
Techniques</p>
      <p>The experimental investigation of the effect of
a very early pilot injection on pollutant formation in
a Common-Rail DI Diesel engine was carried out
on a production-type GM FIAT 1.9 l CDTI ECOTEC
Diesel engine. The 4-cylinder engine utilizes a
Common-Rail fuel injection system, variable
geometry turbocharger (VGT), an exhaust gas
recirculation system, and an intake throttle valve. The
engine has four valves per cylinder, centrally
located injectors, and a re-entrant type combustion
chamber. All relevant engine data are given in
Table 1. The mounting of the engine on the test
bench is shown in Fig. 1. The production of this
engine is certified to meet EURO IV emission
standards.</p>
      <p>Engine Type
Bore [mm]
Stroke [mm]</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Displacement [cm3]</title>
      <p>Compression Ratio
DI, 4-cylinder,
charged, 4-stroke
82.0
90.4
1900
18.3
Combustion Chamber
Re-entrant type
Max. Power [kW (PS)]
110 (150) @4000rpm</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Max. Torque (Nm / min-1)</title>
      <p>Injection System
The engine is equipped with a second-generation
Bosch Common-Rail injection system that was
used for all experiments reported in this study.
Regular Diesel fuel was used in the experiments. A
summary of the most important properties of the
used Diesel fuel is shown in Table 2.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Cetane number</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Density at 288K</title>
      <p>3
(kg/m )
Viscosity at 313K
(mm2/s)</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Distillation T 50% (K)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>Distillation T 95% (K)</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Sulphur (mg/kg</title>
      <p>fuel)
Lower Heating
Value (MJ/kg-fuel)
53.6
834.2
2.892
539.7
619.0
9.0
43.163</p>
      <p>A Common-Rail fuel system allows for
variable pressures (up to 1600 bar), timing, and
numbers of injections. Second-generation Bosch
injector systems allow for up to five injections (for
example, two pilot, one main, and two post injections)
per cycle. VGTs have flexible vanes, which move
and let more air into the engine, depending on the
load. This technology increases both performance
and fuel economy. Turbo lag is reduced, as the
turbo impeller inertia is compensated using VGT
along with an EGR valve. An intake throttle valve
supports high flow rates of exhaust gas
recirculation. According to conditioning modules for engine
testing, the following applications were used:
- Intake Air Conditioning - Fuel Conditioning and
Measurement - Engine Oil Conditioning and
Engine Coolant Conditioning.</p>
      <p>The air-flow rate was measured using a laminar
flow element. AVL 733, a dynamic fuel meter, was
used for fuel metering. An air-conditioning system
determined and maintained the preset temperature
and pressure of the intake air. Pressure data was
collected for one cylinder. Measured emission data
included smoke number, NOX, HC, and CO. AVL
415, a variable sampling smoke meter, provided
exhaust smoke levels. An engine dynamometer
(AC/DC type) was used to measure engine torque.
The measuring equipment used in the experiments
is summarized in Table 3.</p>
      <p>CO, CO2
NOX
HC
Fuel
Particulate matter</p>
      <p>Advance Options
Analysatormodul Magnos 16
ECO Physics CLD 700
EL ht
Advance Options
FIDAnalysatormodul
MultiFID 14 (THC C3)
Variable Sampling
Smoke Meter AVL 415</p>
      <p>
        AVL 733
A Bosch-type flow bench [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">3, 4</xref>
        ] was used to
measure the fuel injection rate. Fuel is injected into a
tube of constant diameter and known length, filled
with liquid fuel. Then, a pressure wave propagates
through the tube and provides a signal which is
detected by a Kistler piezo electric pressure
transducer (type 70061B) mounted close to the nozzle
exit. This signal correlates to the instantaneous
injection flow-rate. The Piezo signal, fuel delivery
pipe pressure, injector energizing time, injector
current, and voltage are measured with a fast data
acquisition system (sample = 30 kHz, IMTEC
company). All measurements are carried out over 2000
single injection events, where the injected fuel is
collected and weighted. The measured pressure
wave signal is calibrated by the time-integral of the
signal which is equal to the averaged injected fuel
mass per injection. From a comparison of the
injection rate and the current signal, the injection
delay and duration can be derived.
spray cone angle 148 and 120 are showed in the
figure 3 and 4.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>Description of experiments</title>
        <p>The investigations were carried out for a
conventional medium-load point at 2000 rpm, a fuel
amount of 15 mm^3/cycle, an external EGR rate
variation and 700 bar rail pressure.</p>
        <p>In order to get a reference point in the first
experiment the fuel mass of 15 mm^3/cycle was injected
via a single injection. Secondly, 1/15 of the total
fuel mass was pre-injected at a distance (dSOI) of
the 70 CA deg respect to the SOI main injection or
80 deg. BTDC, in this case the fuel mass of the
main injection was 14 mm^3/cycle and Thirdly, a
pilot injection was done 60 deg. BTDC also with a
mass fuel of 1 mm^3/cycle and a Main injection
with 14 mm^3/cycle. See figure 2</p>
        <p>All experiments were carried out first with the spray
cone angle 148° and the same experiments also
were done with the spray cone angle 120°. See
Figure 3.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-2">
        <title>Results and Discussion</title>
        <p>This work was only experimental but numerical
support is expected. A very early pilot injection has
the intention to prepare good conditions for the
combustion. The Soot and NOx emissions for the
For the pilot injection events the HC and CO
emissions are increased. These results were expected
because at very early injection times like 60 or 80
deg. BTDC the pressure, temperature and density
in the combustion chamber are very lower and
therefore the spray penetration is longer, that
means, the fuel spray is impinging on the
cylinderwall. In the figure 5 and 6 the HC and CO
emissions are showed for a SCA 148°.</p>
        <p>Due a better quality of the combustion the HC and
CO are lower but unfortunately the NOx emission
increases due at the high temperature. In
relationship to the pilot events there are not advantages
with respect to the HC and CO emissions.
However the HC and CO emissions for the SCA
120 are decreased with respect to the SCA 148°.
See figure 7 and 8.
For the nozzle with the SCA 148° the IMEP is for
the single injection the largest. That means, the
fuel consumption is higher for the cases with pilot
events. This is a consequence that the spray of the
pilot injections is impinging on the cylinder walls. In
the figure 9 is showed the IMEP versus NOx for
the SCA 148.
For the nozzle with SCA 120 the IMEP for the
single injection event is similar to the experiment with
the SCA 148. However, the pilot injection at 60 deg.
BTDC showed a similar value of IMEP in
comparison to the single injection.
An optimal injection strategy is necessary in order
to reduce the NOx, Soot, HC and CO emissions
and to move the combustion phasing after the top
death center. Therefore is necessary to do a lot of
experiments using different start of injection times
for the main- and pilot injections in order to find the
optimal.</p>
        <p>Use of a very early pilot injection reduces mainly
the Soot and NOx emissions but increase the HC
and CO emissions.</p>
        <p>A drastic reduction of HC and CO is possible by
using of one smaller Spray Cone Angle.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Merker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schwarz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stiesch</surname>
            , Otto,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          “Verbrennungsmotoren“ ,
          <year>2004</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Won</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Vanegas, “
          <article-title>Experimental Study of HC Emissions Using Narrow Spray Cone Angles and Different Surrogate Fuels in Low Temperature Diesel Combustion Systems FISITA 2008 World Automotive Congress, September 2008 Munich Germany</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bosch</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , ”
          <article-title>Der Einspritzgesetzindikator - ein neues Messgerät zur direkten Bestimmung des Einspritzgesetzes von Einzeleinspritzungen”</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>MTZ-Motortechnische</surname>
            <given-names>Zeitschrift</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <volume>25</volume>
          (
          <issue>7</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1964</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smith</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Timoney</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Fuel Injec tion Rate Analysis - A New Diagnostic Tool for Combustion Research”</article-title>
          , Paper No.
          <source>SAE 92224</source>
          ,
          <year>1992</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>