<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Enriching thesauri with ontological information: Eurovoc thesaurus and DALOS domain ontology of consumer law</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maria Angela Biasiotti</string-name>
          <email>biasiotti@ittig.cnr.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Meritxell Fernandez-Barrera</string-name>
          <email>Meritxell.Fernandez@EUI.eu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>CNR-ITTIG</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Via de Barucci, 20, 50127 Florence</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>European University Institute</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Via dei Roccettini, 9, I-50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI)</addr-line>
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper analyses the semantic shortcomings of thesauri in comparison with ontologies in the framework of the trend to building KOS that enable IR by concept search instead of textual search. A particular case study in the domain of the consumer law is presented, in which the di erences in terms of semantic depth between the Eurovoc thesaurus and the DALOS ontology are analysed. Moreover the paper analyses the existing technical solutions for semantically enriching thesauri, and explores which would be the possibilities in the case of the Eurovoc thesaurus taking into account that a great number of documents have already been indexed with its descriptors.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        The purpose of the Semantic Web approach is to make web content
machineprocessable in order to develop new functionalities beyond the mere display of
data, such as enabling a better access to relevant information contained in web
documents. One of the main problems of the WWW is information overload [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]
and the limited software performance in extracting useful information for users.
It is thus desirable to develop improved techniques for accessing quickly not
only relevant documents, but the bits of information embedded in them that
speci cally match the user queries.
      </p>
      <p>The paper presents an analysis of the di erent semantic depth in which a
speci c legal domain (the consumer law domain) is represented by di erent KOS:
the Eurovoc thesaurus and the DALOS domain ontology of consumer law. Given
the shortcomings of Eurovoc and after having reviewed the state of the art in
semantic enrichment of thesauri, a transition procedure to support the shift
from a traditional KOS, like Eurovoc, towards a full- edged and semantically
rich KOS is suggested.</p>
      <p>Before analysing the two di erent representation models adopted by Eurovoc
and by Dalos in the Consumer Protection eld we will brie y outline which are
the main characters and features of these considered models.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Case study. Representation of the consumer law domain</title>
      <p>2.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Knowledge Organization Systems</title>
        <p>As to the di erent metadata structures that can channel the addition of
semantics to legal information, we can mention several ways of attaching meaning to
the information contained in the web, like catalogs, thesauri and frames.</p>
        <p>More speci cally and in brief ontologies are controlled vocabularies expressed
in an ontology representation language (OWL), whereas taxonomies or semantic
nets are a collection of controlled vocabulary terms organized into a hierarchical
structure, and thesauri are networked collections of controlled vocabulary terms.
Each term in a taxonomy is in one or more parent-child relationships to other
terms in the taxonomy, while in a thesaurus associative relationships are used in
addition to parent-child relationships. In more detail the latter can be de ned as
a classi cation tool to assist libraries, archives or other centres of documentation
to manage their records and other information.</p>
        <p>This functionality is achieved by establishing paths between terms. The
establishment and development of a thesaurus is generally arranged in accordance
with the standards of ISO (International Standards Organization), which are
especially recognised at international level.</p>
        <p>
          In this context, the main di erence between thesauri and ontologies is
actually the degree of semantic precision with which they describe contents. On
the one hand, a thesaurus embodies a terminological representation of a domain
(a particular lexicalisation of a conceptualisation) which is not as semantically
complete as the formal conceptual representation provided by an ontology, and
its limited structure makes it therefore unsuitable for advanced semantic
applications [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ]. In particular, the relationships linking the terms (the controlled
vocabulary to represent concepts) in a thesaurus (BT, NT, RT) are usually not
enough for a deep analysis of the semantics of the indexed documentation. On
the other hand, ontologies provide a deeper conceptual representation of the
domain (with a richer set of relationships between concepts like part of, instance
of, role, among others, depending on the semantic domain) and can therefore
enhance better access to the content of specialised documents.
        </p>
        <p>In this framework, the purpose of this paper will be to explore the suitability
of di erent KOS for representing the semantics of a speci c legal domain and to
analyse how a semantically simpler KOS (a thesaurus) can be enriched. We will
show the need to move towards this trend by analysing two di erent knowledge
representation models provided for the consumer protection domain.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Representation of Consumer Law Domain</title>
        <p>The legal domain chosen for our case study is the consumer law domain. It is
chosen just as a preliminary study to analyse the semantic depth of Eurovoc as
regards legal issues. However, in further work it would be desirable to extend
the analysis to other legal domains.</p>
        <p>From a textual analysis of the the Consumer law discipline, namely
Consumer Protection, it arises that relevant concepts to be considered among
others are: Advertising, misleading advertising, commercial communication, Market
surveillance, inspection, disclosure, Commercial activity, Contract, selling price,
unit price, consumer goods, product, raw material, products sold in bulk,
agricultural products, nished product, services, all inclusive services, information
society services, nancial services, producer, buyer, consumer, trader, contract,
unfair-terms, credit-agreement and so on. In particular we will analyse the
representation of this particular domain provided by two KOS: (i) the Eurovoc
thesaurus and (ii) the Dalos ontology of consumer law.</p>
        <p>Case study set-up In this section the speci c representation of the consumer
protection domain provided by the two considered models will be o ered,
outlining shortcomings and needs.</p>
        <p>The rst KOS considered, Eurovoc, has not a proper framework for the
consumer protection law within sector Law. It sets it within sector 20 devoted to
Trade, in the Micro Thesaurus Consumption. Therefore the consumer
protection is just the NT of the top term consumer and has some RT relationship
with other relevant concepts such as advertising, producer's liability, publishing
of prices and so on.</p>
        <p>The consumer descriptor has then hierarchical relationships with other
relevant terms such as consumer information, European consumer information
agency, consumer movement, product quality, product designation, product life,
product safety, defective product.</p>
        <p>From the EUROVOC scenario it emerges that the description provided by
Eurovoc of Consumer has few constraints with respect to the Consumer law
protection. In fact, Eurovoc pertains to the category of traditional thesauri,
structured on hierarchical and synonymy relations, with a rigid structure and
inter-lingual relations but a poor semantics. Its scope is broad (European policy
issues), and the components devoted to the normative domain are very weak in
precision and granularity. As the focus is on socio-economic issues, depth in law
is quite low and the structure is not appropriate to EU law. One of its main
limitations is therefore that it is not suitable for the indexation and the search
of specialised documents.</p>
        <p>It is indeed quite at and unconsistent with respect to the domain: the
consumer is a top term and has only some hierarchical relationship with other
descriptors such as consumer information, product safety, and a few others.</p>
        <p>Generally speaking the Eurovoc model presents:
{ lack of expressivity and granularity : the concepts considered are very few
with respect to those emerging form the legal sources (for instance, a
nondescriptor is foreseen for consumers rights, but no descriptor exists to refer
to a speci c instance of this concept, like withdrawal right );
{ lack of semantics : the thesaurus relationships are semantically overloaded,
in the sense that the same relationship is used to express di erent semantic
links where three di erent possible ontological relations have been identi ed
for the relation NT, and two di erent relations for RT.
{ lack of legal orientation: relationships are xed and inexpressive of the
domain relationships and meaning. They are limited to BT, NT, RT, UF and
are therefore not speci c to the domain. For instance, the link between
Consumer and consumers right is rstly, not direct, since consumerss right is
a non-descriptor for consumer protection, which is a NT of Consumer.
Secondly, the relation is not speci c to the domain, it is just a generic
hierarchical relationship, whereas in a deeper semantic model the representation
could be that Consumer has-right-towards someone else.</p>
        <p>As Eurovoc was drafted exclusively for manual indexing and retrieval
purposes, the lack of semantic precision generates frequent inconsistencies among
several hierarchical and synonymy relations so that it is mainly suitable for
retrieving related terms. In the same way as all existing thesauri it is focused on
documentation and lacks su cient granularity for semantic access to EU law.</p>
        <p>The ontology of consumer law developed in the frame of the DALOS project3
provides a formal representation of the classes of the world entities involved in
the domain of consumer law (agents, actions, legal roles, legal e ects ).</p>
        <p>Relevant concepts are all present as captured directly from the legal sources
by the NLP techniques. They are well identi ed into ve classes Agent, Quality,
Region, Event and Object and linked to each other by some signi cant
relationships. The contextualization provided by the Dalos domain ontology is consistent
with respect to the domain since:
{ there is a higher conceptual expressivity and granularity, as proven by the big
number of domain speci c concepts: for instance withdrawal-right;
damagecompensation; consumer-complaint.
{ relationships between concepts have a legal orientation (are speci c to the
domain).
{ and relationships are not semantically overloaded, that is, a semantic relation
is not used with more than one meaning, unlike RT and NT in Eurovoc.</p>
        <p>Comparing the two di erent approaches in representing the other relevant
concepts of the Consumer protection law, such as advertising, we obtain the
following scenario:</p>
        <p>The two models considered produce two di erent representations as to
granularity, expressiveness, constraint and consistency.</p>
        <p>Descriptors in Eurovoc are not consistent with respect to the speci c domain
as they are identi ed independently for the concepts embedded in the domain
itself. They are identi ed according to a top-down approach by an expert who
3 http://www.dalosproject.eu/
considers those terms relevant for describing the domain without any reference
to the legal texts. Whereas the Dalos ontology has been built according to a
bottom-up approach which enables experts to take into due consideration the
richness, the concepts and relations arising directly from the text, that are the
sources of law ruling on the Consumer protection eld.</p>
        <p>Indeed Eurovoc pretends to describe the consumer protection domain with
around 23 terms, whereas the DALOS ontology aims at doing the same with
over 100 concepts.</p>
        <p>Eurovoc shortcomings as regards the representation of the consumer law
domain could thus be tackled by enriching the simpli ed conceptualisation
represented by its terminology with deeper conceptual relations speci c to the
domain. In the following section we will brie y review some technical solutions for
designing a more complete semantic model building on a pre-existing semantic
resource.
3</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Techniques for enriching semantically lexical resources</title>
      <p>From an analysis of the literature dealing with the enrichment of metadata
resources with a deeper semantics it is possible to identify di erent techniques.
On the one hand, those that rely on the combination of pre-existing resources
and on the other hand those that simply restructure a pre-existing resource.</p>
      <p>
        The techniques belonging to the rst trend (highlighted in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]) maintain the
autonomy of both resources and therefore avoid an actual merging. They are the
following:
{ restructuring a computational lexicon following ontological principles,
focusing thus on the lexical resource as the nal output and using the ontology
merely as a guiding tool. The resulting lexical resource respects certain
ontological restrictions but does not become a full- edged ontology.
Some of the suggestions for a better semantics of lexical resources include:
making a proper use of the is-a link so that it expresses not only lexical
relations but ontological ones (-this would amount to using the is-a relation only
to link entities that share similar identity criteria- ); avoiding the confusion
between concepts and instances, avoiding the subsumption of types by roles
as derived from the ONTOCLEAN methodology- and not mixing di erent
levels of generality, among others [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ].
{ populating an ontology with lexical information, which amounts to mapping
lexical units to ontological entries;
{ aligning an ontology with a lexical resource, that is, combining the
restructuration of the computational lexicon according to ontological-driven
principles and its mapping with the ontological resource.
      </p>
      <p>
        With regard to the second trend, we can mention those techniques that simply
draw on a single pre-existing resource, namely a thesaurus and exploit the
possibility of transforming it into a more complex knowledge representation structure,
that is, into an ontology. The main di erence from the previous techniques is
that in this case the input consists just of one initial semantic resource (the
thesaurus) and that the nature of the resulting resource changes: the thesaurus
not only gains in semantic precision and structure, but it becomes a full- edged
ontology, that is, a rigid semantic representation of the domain with a hierarchy
of classes and corresponding slots or properties that increases in constraint
density4 (a higher set of relationships linking its terms). Several works have shown
concerns on the connection between thesauri and ontologies ([
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]; [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]) and
discussed their di erent semantic scope. A general perspective on the possibility
of converting thesauri into ontologies is given by [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ] and speci c examples of
thesaurus reengineering are [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
4
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Applicability of existing techniques to eurovoc: approaches for improvement</title>
      <p>As to the techniques that could be applied to achieve our goals, several
possibilities arise.
4.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Mapping of EUROVOC to pre-existing legal ontologies</title>
        <p>The rst one, corresponds to the mapping of lexical entries and ontological classes
(populating the classes of the ontology with the thesaurus terms). This may in
some cases be feasible, where in Eurovoc there exists a term advertising and
in Dalos ontology a concept with the same name. In this case an equivalence
relationship could be added to the Dalos ontology to link the Dalos advertising
concept and corresponding term in Eurovoc, creating a direct link between the
two resources. However, in some other cases populating the ontology with
Eurovoc classes might be more di cult, where Eurovoc has no corresponding term
for the Dalos concept product.</p>
        <p>Indeed, since Eurovoc is a general thesaurus it therefore does not match
the semantic requirements of a specialised domain such as the consumer law,
and there will be cases in which it will not be possible to nd an Eurovoc
term corresponding to a class of the DALOS ontology. This is why it will be
necessary, in the process of mapping the ontology to the thesaurus, to enrich the
semantics of Eurovoc adding more terms. This would amount to making some
kind of restructuring of the thesaurus, but in this respect, we have to take into
account an important restriction, namely, that Eurovoc is currently used to index
documents and in order not to loose this indexation it is necessary to maintain
current Eurovoc terms. This imposes limitations on a possible restructuration of
the thesaurus, for it will not be possible to delete any descriptors even if semantic
consistency might require to do so in some cases.</p>
        <p>
          A further di culty of following the approach of using the thesaurus to
populate a pre-existing ontology is that it would be necessary to identify ontologies
4 The notion of constraint density is introduced by [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ] as the density of the \network
of constraints" that holds between the concepts.
for several specialised domains of the law, if the whole structure of Eurovoc
referring to the legal eld wants to be expanded semantically. Dalos would be
the option for the consumer protection domain but it might turn up more di
cult to nd ontologies of other speci c legal areas, such as international law or
environmental law.
4.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Reengineering Eurovoc into a formal ontology</title>
        <p>A di erent option would be to use merely the Eurovoc thesaurus and transform
it into a full- edged ontology. This would require providing the thesaurus with
a well structured semantics and to represent it in a highly expressive language
like OWL. In order to do that, it would be necessary to:
{ increase speci city and granularity by adding more classes corresponding to
the legal domain;
{ re ning the relationships existing between the di erent terms of the
thesaurus (BT, NT, RT, UF, USE) according to the semantics of the domain
(adding therefore other types of relations);
{ checking ontological consistency (ontological constraints).
5</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>The proposed approach tries to meet the new trend arising from the Semantic
Web towards the development of legal KOS able to allow the user to search
by concept instead of searching by words. This implies the use of tools able to
expand the query from a semantic point of view, meaning that the concept
identied is surrounded by other concepts semantically linked to it. In this framework,
the paper has analysed the semantic scope of a traditional KOS (Eurovoc) used
for the indexation and retrieval of legal information in the EU institutions and
national parliaments.</p>
      <p>The paper has provided some concrete evidence on the semantic
shortcomings of the Eurovoc thesaurus for the representation of the legal domain by
analysing how it represents the particular domain of the consumer protection
law in comparison to DALOS domain ontology. The main ndings are, rstly,
that in Eurovoc there is a lack of semantic granularity, since many relevant
concepts of the domain are not represented by its descriptors; relations linking
terms are semantically overloaded and therefore only shallowly expressive; and
relations are not speci c of the legal domain, but generic (RT, BT, NT, UF).
Taking into account that currently one of the main functionalities of the Eurovoc
thesaurus is to be used as an indexing and searching tool of legal documentation
(it is for instance used by Eur-lex, the gateway for accessing European Union
law), it arises the need of equipping the thesaurus with more powerful
conceptual structures speci c to the legal domain in order to improve search and legal
information retrieval.</p>
      <p>Secondly, the paper assesses which are the technical possibilities, according
to the state of the art, for enriching semantically the Eurovoc thesaurus. Two
methods are highlighted as feasible solutions: on the one hand, using Eurovoc
to populate pre-existing ontologies on speci c legal domains; on the other hand,
transforming Eurovoc into a full- edged ontology by enriching its conceptual
structure and expressing it using formal representation languages.
6</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Further work</title>
      <p>The paper presents some preliminary conclusions as to possible directions to
solve the problem of the semantic limitations of a current indexing and retrieval
tool used at EU and national level for legal documentation. However, further
research is foreseen in order to implement the project:
{ A whole assessment of the semantic representation of the legal domain by
Eurovoc: building on the case study presented in this paper that analyses
the representation of the domain of the consumer law, further analysis of
Eurovoc semantic representation of other legal domains is required.
{ Analysis of the bene ts that the proposed approach would bring about: run
experiments to measure the degree of improvement of information retrieval
tasks by the use of an ontological structure instead of Eurovoc structure
and analyse the bene ts for the various users of Eurovoc (EU institutions,
national parliaments, private users with licence).
{ Analysis of the costs of implementing the approach: in terms rstly, of the
KOS reengineering costs: and secondly, the adaptation of current information
systems to the new KOS.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Arano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          : Thesauruses and ontologies [on line].
          <source>Hipertext.net, 3</source>
          , (
          <year>2005</year>
          ) &lt;http: //www.hipertext.net&gt; [Consulted:
          <volume>07</volume>
          /01/09].
          <source>ISSN 1695-5498</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Benjamins</surname>
            , Casanovas,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gangemi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Selic</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (Eds.):
          <article-title>Law and the Semantic Web</article-title>
          . Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information Retrieval, and Applications. Springer Verlag. Berlin Heidelberg 5, (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Coulthard</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Malcolm and Johnson, Alison: An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics. Language in Evidence. London and New York Routledge, (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cross</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brickley</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Koch</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Conceptual relationships for encoding thesauri, classi cation systems and organised metadata collections and a proposal for encoding a core set of thesaurus relationships using an RDF Schema</article-title>
          . Available in: http: //www.desire.org/results/discovery/rdfthesschema.html, (
          <year>2000</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gangemi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guarino</surname>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oltramari</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Conceptual Analysis of Lexical Taxonomies: The Case of WordNet Top Level In Formal Ontology in Information Systems</article-title>
          . Proceedings of FOIS2001, eds. C. Welty and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Barry</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <volume>285</volume>
          -
          <fpage>296</fpage>
          . New York: Association of Computing Machinery, (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6. Garc a Jimenez,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Instrumentos de representacin del conocimiento: tesauros versus ontolog as</article-title>
          .
          <source>Anales de Documentacion</source>
          ,
          <volume>7</volume>
          , 79{
          <fpage>95</fpage>
          , (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hirst</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Ontology and the Lexicon Handbook on Ontologies</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information Systems</source>
          . Springer, (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lazonder</surname>
          </string-name>
          et al.:
          <article-title>Di erences between Novice and Experienced Users in Searching Information on the World Wide Web</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of the American Society for Information Science</source>
          ,
          <volume>51</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <volume>576</volume>
          {
          <fpage>581</fpage>
          , (
          <year>2000</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oltramari</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Prevot, Borgo:
          <article-title>Theoretical and practical aspects of interfacing ontologies and lexical resources</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proc. of the 2nd Italian Semantic Web workshop SWAP</source>
          <year>2005</year>
          (
          <article-title>Semantic Web Applications</article-title>
          and Perspectives), Trento, (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Qin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Paling</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology: the case of GEM</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>6</volume>
          , 2. Available in: http://informationr.net/ir/ 6-2/paper94.html, (
          <year>2000</year>
          -01)
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sartor</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Legislative information and the web</article-title>
          .
          <source>Biasiotti</source>
          et al.:
          <source>Legal Information Management of Legislative Documents</source>
          , (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soergel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lauser</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fisseha</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Keizer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Katz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Reengineering thesauri for new applications: the AGROVOC example</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Digital Information</source>
          ,
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ), (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13. Wilson,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          : Migrating from Thesauri to Ontologies. Available in: http://www. w3c.rl.ac.uk/ukofficepasttalksindex.html, (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>