<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Year Precision Recall</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Mapping-Chains for studying Concept Shift in Political Ontologies</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Shenghui Wang</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Stefan Schlobach</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Janet Takens</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Wouter van Atteveldt</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Communication Science</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Computer Science Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>1994</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>0</volume>
      <abstract>
        <p>For some years now ontologies have been used in Social Science, e.g. , in annotation of newspaper articles for disambiguating concepts within Media Analysis. These ontologies and annotations have now become objects of study in their own right, as they implicitly represent the shift of meaning of political concept over time. Manual mappings, which are intrinsically intensional, can hardly capture such subtle changes, but we claim that automatic instance-based mappings, with their extensional character, are more suitable for producing interesting mapping-chains. In this paper, we evaluate the use of instance-based ontology mappings for producing concept chains in a case-study in Communication Science on a corpus with ontologies describing the Dutch election campaigns since 1994. This initial research shows the potential of the associative character of extensional mapping-chains, but also indicates a number of unsolved open questions, most signi cantly the lack of a proper methodology for evaluating such chains due to the open, explorative character of the task.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Since 1994 Communications Scientists at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam have
been annotating newspaper articles with controlled vocabularies (of increasing
expressiveness) quantitatively studying the in uence of the Media on the
political processes. The idea is to code the meaning of sentences and articles in a
formalised graph representation (called NET) similar to RDF triples. In these
triples actors and issues are taken from an ontology, and the predicate usually
represents opinions and moods. During recent election campaigns all newspaper
articles on Dutch politics were manually coded using the NET method, with a
di erent ontology used in each of the elections. Each ontology is more or less an
adaptation of a previous one, with di erent foci, as in each election new issues
emerged and the (societies' and scientists') view on issues changed.</p>
      <p>As now several of these campaign data sets can easily be queried, also through
the use of Semantic Web technology, Communication Scientists' interests started
to also include temporal shifts of political development. In an initial analysis
political developments over time were studied by querying the NET representation
of the articles from the di erent campaigns, which required manual mappings
between the ontologies. In this paper, we propose a di erent approach, namely
to study concept shift by using chains of extensional, i.e. , instance-based,
mappings. Our hypothesis is that these mapping-chains represent subtle changes in
meaning of the related concepts over time, and in this paper we will investigate
this claim.</p>
      <p>
        Methodology Following our previous work [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] we use information retrieval
techniques to calculate document similarity between annotated articles, which we
use subsequently to identify similarity between concepts. Chains between the
most similar of these concepts thus produce graph-like structures (lines, trees,
or DAGs), which \tell their own" story of Dutch politics over the past 15 years.
Research questions There are two major research questions, one regarding the
correctness of our hypothesis, the second concerning the validity of our approach.
More concretely we have to investigate:
{ RQ1: What are suitable structures for representing mapping chains?
{ RQ2: Can instance-based ontology mapping provide useful mapping-chains
expressing concept shift, and how can we evaluate those chains?
The second research questions relates to a fundamental methodological issue,
for which no simple answers exist: the vague character of the success criteria
usefulness. To answer RQ2 we will argue for usefulness through qualitative
evidence, namely by providing some detailed analyses of chains in a real use-case.
Automatically evaluating quality of chains is even more di cult. Remember that
we want to use the extensional semantics of the concepts for determining the
mappings, which makes the only comparison we have, namely an intensional
gold-standard, di cult to justify. In our use-case, the line between what was
identi ed to be a correct extensional mapping and what was an incorrect
association was very ne, and studying this friction will be in our view an important
future topic for this type of research.
      </p>
      <p>Data, experiments and evaluation For our experiments we used 5 di erent
ontologies from the Dutch election campaigns in 1994, 1998, 2002, 2003 and 2006.
Our experiment were conducted by mapping each of ontologies with each other.
Each ontology was used to annotate (around 5000) newspaper articles of the
respective campaign. Some initial formal evaluation was done by comparing
mappings with an existing manually created (intensional) alignment. Evaluating the
quality of the chains is more tricky, as we will discuss in Section 5.3. The answer
to RQ2 therefore remains anecdotal, and nally rather unsatisfactory.
Applications and generality Capturing meaning shift, particularly the
extensional associations, of concepts over time, can help communication scientists to
apply analysis on the dynamics of the political developments over time. This line
of research is also generalisable in many other areas where similar problems
occur, such as development of medical systems, e-Science, knowledge management,
and other social networks, etc.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Instance-based matching method</title>
      <p>
        Instance-based ontology matching techniques have shown its capacity of dealing
with matching cases where lexical and structural techniques could not be applied
e ectively [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2, 3</xref>
        ]. A straightforward method is to measure the common extension
of concepts [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref5">4, 5</xref>
        ]. The major limitation of this method is usually a lack of shared
instances. Recently, we have investigated ways of detecting concept correlation
using the similarity between their instances [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">2, 1</xref>
        ]. In our case, coders used
concepts to describe the content of newspaper articles. We consider an article as an
instance of a concept, if the concept is used to describe this article. Our
hypothesis is that, even if the ontologies during di erent election periods are di erent,
two similar articles should have been coded using similar concepts. Therefore,
nding similar instances can lead to similar concepts.
      </p>
      <p>Let O1 and O2 be two ontologies which are used to annotate two instance
sets I1 and I2. The instance-matching based method consists of two steps:
{ Instance enrichment. For each instance i1 in I1, nd the most similar instance
j2 in I2. We consider i1 to be an instance of the concepts which j2 is described
with. The same operation is applied in the other direction. In the end, an
arti cial common instance set is built.
{ Concept matching. Each concept corresponds to a set of instances, including
their real instances and those enriched in the previous step. A corrected
Jaccard similarity measure is applied to calculate the similarity between
concepts from di erent years. That is</p>
      <p>Jacc =
pjc1i [ c2ij (jc1i [ c2ij</p>
      <p>
        0:8)
jc1i [ c2ij
(1)
where c1i, c2i are the instance sets of two concept c1(2 O1) and c2(2 O2). 3
Two concepts with su cient similarity are considered mapped. A set of mappings
between concepts of two ontologies form an alignment between the ontologies.
Instance matching There are di erent ways to match instances. A simple
method is to consider instances as documents, and apply information retrieval
techniques to retrieve similar instances (documents). We use a tf-idf weighting
scheme which is often exploited in the vector space model for information
retrieval and text mining [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. The idea is that each document is represented by a
vector, each element is a weight of a word which occurs in this document. Each
word is weighted using its if -idf value. Traditionally, a query is represented as a
vector using the idf of the to-be-queried dataset. In our case, the same word is
likely to have di erent importance in di erent datasets, therefore, while building
the vector representation of each document, we use the corresponding idf values
3 To avoid very high scores in the case of very few instances a 0.8 parameter was
chosen so that concepts with a single (also shared) instance obtain the same score
as concepts with, in the limit, in nitely many instances, 20% of which co-occur.
of words calculated within the dataset to which the document belongs. Based on
such vectors, the cosine similarity is used to determine the similarity between
two documents. In this way, instances from di erent datasets are matched, and
the information is used for the enrichment process.
      </p>
      <p>Chains of mappings After alignments are generated between multiple
ontologies, with some ontologies involved in multiple alignments, it is possible to
generate chains of mappings between a series of ontologies, in, for example, a
chronological order.</p>
      <p>Let A12 and A23 be the alignments between O1 and O2 and between O2
and O3. If there is a mapping in A12, &lt; c1i; c2j ; vi1j2 &gt; and a mapping in A23,
&lt; c2j ; c3k; vj2k3 &gt;, this results in a two-step chain of mapping from c1i to c3k via
c2j , with a con dence value vik = vi1j2 vj2k3. When there are a series of alignments
between O1 and O2, O2 and O3, until On 1 and On, this will result in n-1-step
chains of mappings
&lt; c1i ! c2j !
! cn 1;k ! cnl; vi1j2
: : : vknl 1;n &gt; :
In this paper, we investigate 4 di erent kinds of mapping-chains, and investigate
their usefulness in a practical application:
1. Top-1 forward chain (such as in Fig.:2): in each step, only the mapping with
highest con dence is considered.
2. Top-n forward-chains (such as in Fig.:4): in each step, the the best n
mappings are considered, starting with the rst ontology.
3. Top-n backward-chains (such as in Fig.:5): in each step, the the best n are
considered, starting with the last ontology.
4. Top-n kite (such as in Fig.:6): starting with the rst ontology in each step,
the mappings with the n highest con dence values for which there exist a top
n mapping chain to the correct mapping (according to the gold standard).
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Ontologies in Semantic Network Analysis</title>
      <p>
        The series of ontologies to be mapped are the ontologies used to code newspapers
during ve recent Dutch elections taking place in 1994, 1998, 2002, 2003, and
2006. The articles were coded using the Network analysis of Evaluative Texts
(NET) method [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ], popularly used in the Semantic Network Analysis. During
each election year, annotators coded newspaper articles using the ontology
available to them. Take as an example a sentence in a newspaper article during the
election period in 2006.
      </p>
      <p>
        Example 1. Het Openbaar Ministerie (OM) wil de komende vier jaar
mensenhandel uitroeien. (The Justice Department (OM) wants to eliminate human
trafcking within the next four years.)
The sentence is coded as &lt;om, -1,human trafficking&gt;, where om and human
trafficking are two concepts in the ontology used in 2006, while -1 indicates
the Justice Department is negative about human tra cking. In this example, we
consider this sentence to be an instance of the two concepts involved. All ve
ontologies are represented in the standard SKOS format [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. Each concept has
an prefLabel and possibly a few altLabel which are the synonyms of this concept
and also used by coders in the coding process. Except the most recent election,
all the newspapers are coded at the article level, but mainly based on the rst
three sentences. In 2006, the coding is at the sentence level.
      </p>
      <p>The synonymous concepts were found manually. As shown in Table 1, the
number of manually mapped concepts is smaller than that of concepts found
in the actual coding. The reason is that new variations of the concepts were
manually input to the database. These variations are very likely to be synonyms
of concepts in the ontologies or pure typos, which were not covered during the
manual mapping process.</p>
      <p>Alignments between ontologies of previous years to the latest 2006 version
have also been made manually. However, some concepts used in previous years
cannot nd the exact correspondences in the 2006 version. In that case, the
domain experts added new concepts to the current version. The last column
of Table 1 indicates how many new concepts were added during the manual
aligning process. These new concepts are not used during the coding of 2006
articles, which means they do not have any instances in the 2006 corpus and
were therefore not considered in our automated evaluation.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Base experiments: single mappings</title>
      <p>Before focussing on chains of mappings, we need to show that our methods
for calculating individual mappings are trustworthy. We rst map all previous
ontologies to the 2006 ontology. According to the extensional mapping technique,
one concept can be related to multiple concepts, each with a certain amount
of relatedness. As only one mapping for each concept was considered in the
manual mapping results, for each concept, we take the mapping with the highest
con dence value (i.e. , the corrected Jaccard similarity) as the nal mapping of
this concept. Table 2 shows precision and recall of these 1:1 mappings.</p>
      <p>For all the concepts which were manually mapped with existing concepts in
the 2006 ontology, we also measure the mean reciprocal rank (MRR) mrr =
jC1 j PiC=1 ran1ki ; where C is the set of concepts, the ranki is the rank of the
concept which Ci should be mapped to. When Ci does not have a match, the
reciprocal rank is set to 0. A higher mrr indicates the correct matches are ranked
in the more front position. Table 3 shows that the correct mapping is ranked on
average within the top 10 proposed ones.
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Main experiments: Chains of mappings</title>
      <p>The main topic of this paper is to investigate the use of chains of mappings of
concepts from ontologies from 1994 to 2006.
5.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Quantitative analysis</title>
        <p>Based on the manual alignments, we can measure the precision and recall of the
chains. For each concept from 1994, top K mappings are taken into consideration,
each of which will be expanded by its top K mappings too, and so on.4 A chain
can start from any concept of any year. For all chains with n steps, n = 1; 2; 3; 4,
we measure the precision and recall respectively. A chain is considered to be
correct if the two end-point concepts form a correct mapping according to gold
standard, i.e. , the correctness is 1; a chain is partially correct and the correctness
is the number of correct mappings on the way over the number of steps. In the
end we take the average of the correctness of all individual chains as the nal
precision. The partial correctness is not considered when calculating the recall.
The evaluation results are shown in Fig. 1.</p>
        <p>Clearly, when considering more mapping candidates, more noisy data is
included. Fig. 1 (c) gives the raw count of chains in terms of the choice of K. Note
the numbers are in log scale. The red line indicates the number of chains with
the two end-point concepts form a correct mapping judged by the gold standard.
4 By expanding via di erent intermediate mappings from one concept, the total
amount of chains is growing, but not exponentially. The reason is that concepts
related to the starting concept tend to have a similar extensional semantics.</p>
        <p>If only taking top 1, 2 or 3 related concepts, when the steps goes up, the number
of correct chains drop, but the total amount of chains drops even faster. The
precision of multi-step chains is actually higher than that of shorter chains. This
suggests, even the absolute correctness of direct mappings may not be perfect,
a multi-step chains of less perfect mappings may still lead to correct mappings
over all time. Unfortunately, when taking more less related concepts, the number
of correct chains goes up, but the sheer amount of total chains climbs up more
rapidly, which cause the precision to drop in the end; the precision of multi-step
chains is lower than that of shorter chains, that is the quality of the mappings
degraded when the intermediate steps became longer.
5.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>Qualitative analysis of chains</title>
        <p>A qualitative analysis of chains of mappings provides interesting insights in the
value of the matching of ontologies over time for social sciences. A typical
example of mapping of concepts over time will be discussed. The domain-speci c
political analysis will be supplemented by a methodological discussion (we call
it Metaanalysis provided in italics) from the perspective of the usefulness of
mapping-chains.</p>
        <p>Let us start with an analysis of di erent chains for the two concepts asylum
seekers (\asielzoekers") and senior citizens (\ouderen"). Figure 2 shows that the
concept of asylum seekers (label: asielzoekers) is correctly mapped in each of
the election years to the same concept at the highest rank. This result indicates
that no or limited topic drift occurred. The con dence value slowly deteriorates,
which might imply that the debate about asylum seekers has become more
multifaceted. An alternative explanation is that the number of concepts relating to
asylum policy in the ontologies has increased because of the increasing political
interest in asylum policy.
Metaanalysis 1: Even from a simple top 1 forward chain, some lessons can
be drawn. However, note that analyses of this kind depend on the con dence
values, which are rather dubious at best. Top 1 chains are more interesting
objects of study when more drastic shifts occur.</p>
        <p>Figure 3 shows that the elderly concept (ouderen) is only mapped to the
expected concept between 1994 and 1998. The 1998 concept of the elderly is
mapped to \obligation to apply for a job for the unemployed" (sollicitatieplicht).
The abolition of the exemption of the obligation to apply for a job for the
elderly was an election issues in 2002, which explains the link between these
concepts. Both concepts should be considered as social security issues from a
theoretical stance, since the elderly became an election issue during election
campaigns with regard to special social security arrangement for the elderly. In
2003 the obligation to apply is correctly mapped to the 2002 concept. In 2006
the obligation to apply is mapped to the related concept of the unemployed.</p>
        <p>Metaanalysis 2: Association versus similarity: One of the crucial
methodological problems is the formal meaning of the mappings between two concepts
such as the elderly and the obligation to apply. Clearly, our instance-based
methods nd mappings with an extensional semantics, i.e. , the use of the
concepts in annotating articles is related. A domain expert can identify elements
of the intensional meaning that relate these two concepts in the speci c case.
Concretely, the issue \senior citizen" in 1998 and the issue \obligation to
apply" in 2002 also share an intensional meaning. However, to the best of our
knowledge there is no theory to formalise the relation between the extensional
meaning and the intensional meaning of the mappings. In the following we will
see examples where using association misses the goal of nding similarity, in
particular when chains of mappings are considered.</p>
        <p>Although the asylum seeker concept is mapped correctly, the chains including
top 2 concepts { represented in Figure 4 { give additional insights into the
nature of the asylum debate over time. An analysis of the secondly ranked concepts
shows with which issues asylum seekers have been associated during the
election campaigns. In 1998 asylum seekers are mapped to the Cabinet of the time
(kabinet kokmierlods), which follows from the fact that this Cabinet paid much
attention to this issue. The second rank concepts in the following years indicate
changes in the proposed policy measures. In 2002, when the anti-immigration
party LPF came into power, asylum seekers are mapped to the constraint of
the in ux of refugees (instroom beperking). In 2003, after the LPF had left the
government, it was mapped to a non-restrictive measure, assistance to illegal
immigrants (opvang illegalen). In 2006 { the year in which another anti-immigration
party made an upsurge { was mapped to integration. It is worth noting that in
2006 the second rank mapping (integration) has a positive connotation, which
suggests that the new anti-immigration party did not manage to in uence public
opinion to the degree the LPF managed in 2002.</p>
        <p>Metaanalysis 3: This nice example shows a number of useful ndings from
the Communication Scientist perspective. The chains of intensional
meaning of the concepts at the time of their use provides interesting, and
very subtle, developments for further investigation. Given that the top
1 mappings are all correct, the interest lies particular in the second ranked
mappings of each step, which tell a story of Dutch politics.</p>
        <p>With the expansion of the chain, some concepts that were mapped to
secondly ranked concepts do not always directly relate to asylum seekers anymore.
While the secondly ranked concept assistance to illegal immigrants in 2003 was
plausibly mapped to illegal immigrants (illegalen), it was also mapped to organ
donation (orgaandonatie). This latter mapping is explained by a particular
political actor who propagated both the assistance to illegal immigrants in 2003
and organ donation in 2006.</p>
        <p>The lower half of the gure does not directly relate to asylum seekers either,
since the Cabinet in 2003 was not mapped at a high rank to asylum seekers
anymore, but to the military aircraft Joint Strike Fighter (jsf) and business
(bedrijfsleven), which in turn were mapped to concepts in the military and
economical area. We omitted parts of the lower half for space reasons.</p>
        <p>Metaanalysis 4: These are examples, where association can lead to
unrelated concepts in 2 steps only. This highlights one of the biggest methodological
challenges: how to distinguish useful and non-useful chains. Early erroneous
associations can turn large parts of the analysis practically useless.</p>
        <p>Figure 5 containing the backward chain starting from 2006, complements the
information about the nature of the asylum debate. Studying the secondly ranked
concepts mapped to asylum seekers in the backward direction, partially di ering
association with asylum seekers appear. Asylum seekers in 2006 are mapped to
crime (criminaliteit) in 2003. In recent elections immigrants (including asylum
seekers) have been regularly associated with crime by anti-immigration parties.
Although these concepts are not directly related, they are related to each other
in the political reality. As in the forward mapping asylum seekers in 2003 is
mapped to the constraint of the in ux of refugees in 2002. In 1998 they are
mapped to the police (rpolitie) and in 1994 to the Cabinet (luko lubbersko).
The mapping to the police is in line with the mapping to crime in 2003.</p>
        <p>Metaanalysis 5: The chains of the concept mappings in two di erent
directions are complementary. While it seems, for example, anomalous that
churches (okerken) in 1998 is mapped to the constraint of the in ux of asylum
seekers in 2002, the mapping of the constraint of the in ux of asylum seekers in
2002 to assistance to asylum seekers in 1998 in the opposite direction helps to
explain this mapping, since churches played an important role in the assistance
to asylum seekers.</p>
        <p>It is noticeable that the expansion chains do not expand exponentially, but
still faster than we expected.5 An interesting phenomenon is that mappings do
not converge again, i.e. , once an association happens in one year, it usually does
not associate back the following year to the same topic. This is an interesting
nding, for which we do not have an explanation.</p>
        <p>Metaanalysis 6: The expansion factor is meaningful in two ways: it
gives an indication on the debate itself, but it can also be an indication for
the mapping quality. The smaller the tree is, the more closely related are the
associated concepts, which might indicate that the mapping quality is better
than that for larger trees.</p>
        <p>The kite with two correct endpoint concepts integrates the information from
the previous gures. In Figure 6, it becomes clear that the concept of asylum
seekers is correctly mapped from one election year to another. Additionally it
shows that the asylum debate is both associated with central concepts in the
5 In the top 2 chains we studied the average width was 12.
asylum policy debate, the constraint of the in ux of refugees and the assistance
to illegal immigrants, and to crime, a concept that is, however not directly related
to asylum seekers, related to the concept in the political reality.</p>
        <p>Metaanalysis 7: Kites from end to end seem the most useful way of
illustrating concept drift, as incorrect associations are eliminated (because
they are not mapped back to the start-concept). However, such a kite is less
ne-grained than the forward chain: the subtle change between negative and
positive connotation between 02 instroom beperking and 06 integration is lost.
5.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-3">
        <title>Discussion</title>
        <p>The issues discussed in the previous section mostly center around two questions:
the usefulness of our proposed mapping chains, and the meaning of the
extensional mappings in the rst place. Studying a representative sample of chains
through our domain expert indicates clearly that mapping chains can be
interesting given the reasonable quality of the individual mappings we can produce.</p>
        <p>However, apart from the concern about the accuracy of the mapping method
used here, two problems are apparent to which we do not yet have a satisfactory
solution: the lack of a notion of correctness of extensional mappings in the chains,
and the evaluation of this correctness. Our manual analysis shows plenty of
examples where an associative semantics of mappings based on the extensions of
concepts corresponds to an intensional relation of the meaning between of two
concepts. However, in other examples these associations often totally diverge
from what domain experts nd acceptable intensional similarities. We have no
intuition yet how to address this problem, i.e. , how to formalise and study it.
The most promising solution for addressing this problem is to consider the kite
structures, in which the disambiguation of mappings is achieved by requiring
a mapping back to the original concept. In that way wild mismatches can be
eliminated from the temporal chains. Many interesting parts of the temporal
"story" get lost in this approach, though.</p>
        <p>The second problem is the strongly related problem of evaluation: so far we
found only two ways of evaluating our constructs: 1) comparing the chains with
an intensional gold standard, and 2) having a domain expert evaluate each of the
chains. Obviously, the rst option is methodologically not valid, as we evaluate
against something we know not to be the solution. The second approach is more
acceptable from the domain perspective, but manual checking is very expensive
and di cult to quantify, if it is not yet impossible to identify all \intertesting
chains." The only practical solutions we found so far is to use the spreading
factor of the top K chains over time. In our view, the fewer leaves such a tree
has, the semantically closer the mappings should be. However, this idea is build
on intuition rather than empirical ndings.
6</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>In this paper we introduced di erent representations of mapping chains and
evaluated them over sequences of political ontologies in a Media study driven by
Communication Scientists. We used instance-based mappings between pairs of
ontologies to calculate sequences of extensional mappings and show, for a usecase
analysing Dutch election campaigns, some interesting qualitative ndings.</p>
      <p>Apart from these stimulating examples we also provided an initial evaluation
of our proposal, both qualitative and quantitative. However, this evaluation is
tricky, as neither the notion of correctness of an extensional mapping is
wellde ned, nor do we have a sound evaluation methodology yet.</p>
      <p>For us the general lessons for the ontology mapping community is twofold:
that the semantics of mappings is not yet fully understood, particularly, w.r.t.,
extensional semantics, and that mappings in a dynamic context are challenging,
and worthwhile, objects of study in addition to their known static variants.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schopman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schlobach</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Deriving concept mappings through instance mappings</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Semantic Web Conference</source>
          , Bangkok, Thailand (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Englebienne</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schlobach</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Learning concept mappings from instance similarity</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 7th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          ). Volume
          <volume>5318</volume>
          of Lecture Notes in Computer Science., Karlsruhe, Germany, Springer (
          <year>October 2008</year>
          )
          <volume>339</volume>
          {
          <fpage>355</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Isaac</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schopman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schlobach</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S., van der Meij, L.:
          <article-title>Matching multilingual subject vocabularies</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL2009)</source>
          , Corfu, Greece (
          <year>September 2009</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Euzenat</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shvaiko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          : Ontology Matching. Springer Verlag (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Isaac</surname>
          </string-name>
          , A.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>van der Meij</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schlobach</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>An empirical study of instancebased ontology matching</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC</source>
          <year>2007</year>
          ). Volume
          <volume>4825</volume>
          of Lecture Notes in Computer Science.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Busan</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Korea, Springer (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Salton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>McGill</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval</article-title>
          .
          <source>McGrawHill</source>
          (
          <year>1983</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Van</given-names>
            <surname>Cuilenburg</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Kleinnijenhuis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.</surname>
          </string-name>
          , De ridder, J.:
          <article-title>Towards a graph theory of journalistic texts</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Journal of Communication</source>
          <volume>1</volume>
          (
          <year>1986</year>
          )
          <volume>65</volume>
          {
          <fpage>96</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Isaac</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Summers</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.: SKOS Primer. W3C Group Note (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>