<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>March</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>On queries and other messages</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Stephen Robertson Microsoft Research Cambridge</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>J J Thomson Avenue CB</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>FB Cambridge</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>UK ser@microsoft.com</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2010</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>28</volume>
      <issue>2010</issue>
      <abstract>
        <p />
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>There are three parts to this talk { related in rather
tangential ways. First, I will give a recap of an argument developed
in a couple of earlier talks { at IIiX in 2008 and at the SIGIR
evaluation workshop in 2009. The gist of the argument is
about thinking about IR as a science, and the consequences
for both theory and experimentation in the eld. The
second makes use of some ideas from general systems theory
and the notion of open systems, and applies these ideas to
information retrieval and the task context of search. The
third discusses the status of queries in the current search
world, and suggests two new ways to think about queries.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>