<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>CEUR-WS.org</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1613-0073</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Effect of E-recruitment On the Recruitment Process: Evidence from Case Studies of Three Danish MNCs</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Subtasks</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Anna B. Holm, Aarhus University</institution>
          ,
          <country country="DK">Denmark</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2010</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>570</volume>
      <fpage>20</fpage>
      <lpage>21</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The aim of this research is to determine whether the introduction of e-recruitment has an impact on the process and underlying tasks, subtasks and activities of recruitment. Three large organizations with wellestablished e-recruitment practices were included in the study. The case studies were conducted in Denmark in 2008-2009 using qualitative research methods. The findings indicate that e-recruitment had a noticeable effect on the overall recruitment process in the studied organizations. The investigation revealed changes in the sequence, divisibility and repetitiveness of a number of tasks and subtasks. The new process design supported by information and communications technologies was identified and is presented in the paper. This process allowed recruiters in the study to perform recruitment tasks more efficiently. However, practitioners should be aware of the increasing demands of the quality of online communication with applicants, and with it the electronic communication skills of recruitment professionals.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>recruitment</kwd>
        <kwd>e-recruitment</kwd>
        <kwd>web-based recruitment</kwd>
        <kwd>online recruitment</kwd>
        <kwd>staffing</kwd>
        <kwd>e-HRM</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The first decade of the twenty-first century saw rapid growth in the use of online
recruitment [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ] and the transformation of electronic recruitment into one of the fastest
growing recruitment techniques [23:119]. The most often reported benefits of electronic
recruitment include wider applicant outreach [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
        ], faster information exchange between
potential employees and employers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>
        ], lower costs of advertising [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">41</xref>
        ], data
accessibility and availability [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">39</xref>
        ], reduced costs of communications [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>
        ], and improved
organizational attraction [36:284]. The drawbacks of e-recruitment are associated
mainly with résumé overload [11:85], increased diversity in quality of candidates [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ],
lack of personalized response to applicants [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], and issue-related candidate
confidentiality [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ]. Nevertheless, an online hiring process is regarded as being more
cost efficient, and the fastest route to finding the right candidates, than traditional
paperbased recruitment [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Despite the widespread use of e-recruiting methods, a gap seems to have developed
between research into and the practice of e-recruitment [1; 39]. Of the increasing
number of research contributions, many focus on the design of corporate recruitment
websites [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>
        ], applicants‟ perceptions of career websites [5; 9; 16; 39], and
erecruitment system design [14; 26]. Although recruitment by and for organizations is
intended to improve organizational performance [2:124], academic research on the
subject from an organizational perspective is still relatively sparse [33; 34], possibly
because scholars are struggling to keep pace with the sheer rapidity of change [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The
organizational perspective is understood here as the process of organizing and
performing recruitment tasks and activities within organizations and in the context of
organizational environment.
      </p>
      <p>The purpose of this study is to identify how e-recruiting affects the overall recruitment
process, and whether it causes changes in the nature and sequence of tasks associated
with the traditional recruitment of external candidates. The research contributes to the
body of knowledge on the subject of e-recruitment, and is relevant for both academia
and practitioners.</p>
      <p>Case studies of three large multinational Danish companies were carried out in 2008
and 2009. The companies had extensive experience of e-recruiting and deployed a broad
range of electronic means in their recruitment practices. The introduction of
erecruitment technology and sources in the case companies affected both recruitment
activities and the sequence of some recruitment tasks and subtasks. A new task that of
maintaining a corporate career website, was also added to the process.</p>
      <p>The remainder of the paper is structured as follows: The next section discusses the
theoretical starting point of the study. This is followed by an outline of the research
design. The following two sections contain a presentation of the findings and a
discussion of the key conclusions. Finally, I briefly discuss the implications for theory
and practice.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Research Background</title>
      <p>There is wide agreement among scholars about the growing importance of
organizational recruitment in the development of human capital and strategic human
resource management [9; 28; 31]. Given that the primary objective of recruitment is to
identify and attract potential employees [2:10], recruitment can be defined as practices
and activities carried out by an organization for the primary purpose of identifying,
attracting and influencing the job choices of competent candidates [2: 5; 30:178; 35].
Recruitment activities are either directed towards external candidates from outside
organizations or towards current employees, in which case it is called internal
recruitment. The focus of this study is solely on the process of recruiting external
candidates, since internal recruitment often involves other issues, such as career
planning and development [2:4].</p>
      <p>
        E-recruitment can be understood as recruitment carried out by the use of various
electronic means. Online, Internet, or web-based recruiting can be defined as the use of
the Internet to identify and attract potential employees [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>
        ], e.g. advertising a vacant
position and attracting a pool of applicants through corporate websites and Internet job
boards [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. An e-recruitment system is a back-office system for administrating the
recruitment process, and is normally designed to allow applicants to submit their data
electronically. E-recruitment can thus be perceived as an umbrella term covering
recruitment activities performed using various electronic means and the Internet,
including online recruitment and e-recruitment systems.
The recruitment process can vary in complexity and degree of difficulty depending on
the recruitment objectives and the recruitment sources chosen [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. The most commonly
used sources for external recruitment are newspaper ads, private and public employment
agencies, Internet job boards, corporate websites, employee referrals, colleges and
universities, search firms, job fairs, etc. [36:280]. As e-recruitment uses online job ads
as the recruitment source, the focus here will be solely on the recruitment process for
sourcing applicants from advertising.
      </p>
      <p>Traditional recruitment, which uses formal sources like job advertising, starts with the
identification of required applicants, their location and placement in the labour market,
and proceeds with activities to attract and persuade qualified applicants to apply. Job
applications are then received, screened, and sorted, leading to the drawing up of a
shortlist. The process ends with communicating the pre-screening results to applicants.
A summary of this type of recruitment process tasks, subtasks and activities is presented
in Figure 1.</p>
      <p>
        In this study, recruitment is treated as a business process [37: 328], defined by
Davenport and Short [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] as a set of logically related tasks performed to achieve a
defined business outcome for internal or external recipients. A business process occurs
across or between organizational subunits and is independent of formal organizational
structure. In the case of recruiting, this process is normally performed for either internal
customers – line managers and executives from various parts of the organization - or
external ones, resulting in a shortlist of candidates which customers can choose from
(ibid.).
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Tasks</title>
        <p>Identify
Applicants</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-1">
          <title>Attract Applicants</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-2">
          <title>Process Incoming Applications</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-3">
          <title>Communicate with Applicants</title>
          <p>Prepare a job
description and job
specifications</p>
          <p>Identify the
appropriate pool of
applicants</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-4">
          <title>Based on the request for hire from a client (e.g. another department) and eventual job analysis information, identify candidate profile and required qualifications. Develop a job description and job specifications.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-5">
          <title>Identify where and in which segment of the labour market to look for qualified applicants.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-6">
          <title>Select recruitment source, and decide which method to use to reach the target audience, e.g. newspaper advertisements, TV and radio spots, professional magazines, etc.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-7">
          <title>Prepare and place job ads in the selected sources, observing certain requirements such as size restrictions, design guidelines, graphic elements, etc.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-8">
          <title>Sort incoming paper-based applications for each vacancy. File and register these for monitoring and administrating the recruitment process.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-9">
          <title>Pre-screen and review applications, identify a number of applicants to be included in a pool for further assessment and selection. Forward the shortlist to clients for evaluation.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-10">
          <title>Inform rejected applicants that they have not been shortlisted for further consideration. Prepare and mail a formal letter, and /or make a telephone call.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-11">
          <title>Inform prospective candidates by formal letter and / or a telephone call, or in person, that they have been preselected for further assessment. Arrange further interviews with them, site visits, and test.</title>
          <p>
            A business process change can be caused by many factors and affect organizations in
many ways . In order to better understand the complexities related to such changes,
Kettinger and Grover [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
            ] propose a descriptive model of business process change
(BPC) based on research contributions from other scholars and their observations of
practice. The model rests on the assumption that an organization is a complex, social
system consisting of mutually interrelated and self-adjusting subsystems of
organizational change, namely task, technology, people, and structure [20; 24]. The
BPC model is strategy-driven, and adds process, products and services [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
            ].
          </p>
          <p>
            A study of peer-reviewed journal manuscripts on e-recruitment, online and web-based
recruitment, and e-recruitment systems identified only a few research contributions on
e-recruitment from an organizational or business process perspective. Some of these
research contributions are discussed below, and a summary provided in Table 1. And, as
noted by Parry and Tyson [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>
            ], there has been little empirical research to determine
whether e-recruiting leads to radical changes in recruiting practices.
          </p>
          <p>
            In his study on Internet recruiting, Cappelli [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
            ]examines different service providers,
new technologies, and companies‟ recruitment strategies . In his view, the e-recruiting
process consists of three major steps: attracting, sorting, and contacting candidates. The
first step involves the appropriate design of web pages, using electronic networks for
promotion, tracking potential candidates on the Internet and in on-line databases. The
next step – sorting – involves the screening of candidates with the help of sophisticated
on-line tests. In the third step, contacting candidates, e-recruitment systems are a big
help, since they enable communication tasks to be automated (ibid.).
          </p>
          <p>Environmental</p>
          <p>Factors:
•••• SPLRDyoaeeblsgmitotueioulcmagratrslMiaopanhrkicests STTRA
• Cultural Factors E
• Economic G
Conditions Y
• Technological
Innovation
• Technological
Infrastructure</p>
          <p>Management
• Systems
• Styles
• Measures
• Objectives</p>
          <p>Information and</p>
          <p>Technology
• E-recruitment systems
• Web technology
• Electronic
communications
• CV Databases
RECRUITMENT</p>
          <p>PROCESS
• Tasks
• Subtasks
• Activities</p>
          <p>Structure
• Formal and Informal
Structures
• Teams / Work Groups
• Jobs
• Coordination / Control</p>
          <p>
            People
• Skills
• Behaviour
• Culture
• Values
Lee [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
            ], who has studied the evolution of e-recruitment systems and analysed the
corporate career websites of Fortune 100 companies, emphasises that e-recruiting has
fundamentally changed the corporate recruiting process from batch mode to continuous
mode, suggesting a major change in the business process. Unlike the traditional
paperbased recruiting process, e-recruiting allows around-the-clock collection and processing
of job applications. Thus, a modern e-recruiting process is a two-way communication
process, web-enabled, time- and space-independent, and a ubiquitous system for both
job seekers and recruiters (ibid.).
          </p>
          <p>
            Based on a review of the literature, Singh and Finn [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>
            ] conclude that the increased use
of ICTs in recruitment has had a fundamental impact on all aspects of an organization‟s
recruitment function, including people, processes, organizational structures, and forms.
They suggest that new processes are needed to lower costs, accelerate transactions,
improve efficiency, and provide better service. One example of such processes is the
automated, web-based, pre-screening of applicants.
          </p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Article</title>
        <p>The recruitment process turns into a
marketing process of selling jobs, with more
activities and resources dedicated to building
company reputation, Internet
communications, and relationship marketing.
Automation of the entire recruitment process.
Introduction of sophisticated on-line
screening systems. Automated systems for
contacting applicants.</p>
        <p>Change from batch mode to continuous
mode, with some activities being performed
concurrently. Automated pre-screening.
Long-term candidate relationship
management.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Changes in the recruitment process performance</title>
        <p>Shorter recruitment cycles.
Bigger pool of experienced
candidates. Efficient selection of
best candidates.</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-1">
          <title>Cost savings, better efficiency, increased convenience for recruiters and clients, and shift of focus on effectiveness.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-3-2">
          <title>Singh</title>
          <p>
            Finn [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>
            ]
and Introduction of new processes, e.g. web- Lower costs per hire. Shorter
based pre-screening. “Just-in-time” recruiting recruiting lead times. Improved
on demand. quality of candidates.
For various reasons, it was decided to base this research on case studies [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>
            ], in
particular because they allow the researcher to study processes in their social context
[18: 323]. Prior to the study proper, I carried out an exploratory study on the organizing
principles of e-recruitment, during which I selected three large organizations with
wellestablished e-recruiting practices which could potentially allow a case-by-case
comparison [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
            ] and permit theoretical sampling.
          </p>
          <p>I used the recruitment process as the unit of analysis and focused only on the business
process. My interest was primarily in whether e-recruitment had an effect on the
traditional recruitment process, its tasks, subtasks and activities. If the introduction of
erecruitment had resulted in changes in process tasks and subtasks, then it would have
meant dramatic or at least significant changes in the overall recruitment process. If the
changes had occurred only at the level of activities, the changes would be considered
incremental. I was thus looking for possible changes in the tasks, subtasks and activities
of the business process of recruiting which could be attributed to the use of electronic
recruitment.</p>
          <p>The companies selected for the study are all multinational corporations (MNCs)
originating from, and with headquarters in, Denmark. To ensure confidentiality of the
collaborating organizations and their respondents, the companies in this paper have
been given fictitious names - Scandifin, Danadrinco and Energowing. Some general
information about the case companies is provided in Table 2. At the time of the study,
the case companies had been using Internet recruitment and e-recruitment systems for
over 5 years.
Data were first collected at Scandifin, and later, following the replication logic [40:
4748], at Danadrinco and Energowing . In all three case studies, the recruitment process
was embedded in a specific unit: at Scandifin and Danadrinco it was in the HR
departments responsible for recruiting in Denmark only, while at Energowing it was in
the unit responsible for recruitment for a major division. All the data were collected in
Denmark in the years 2009 and 2010. Following Yin [40: 39-53], this research design
can be defined as a multiple embedded case study, and is regarded as being
crosssectional.</p>
          <p>
            The data for each case were collected from multiple sources available to the researcher,
and were predominantly qualitative [15: 465]. Qualitative data was considered to be
more suitable, since it can provide insights into complex social processes [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
            ], such as
the recruitment process in this study.
          </p>
          <p>I conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with a number of key informants,
including HR partners and brand managers, recruitment partners, and others, who were
involved in recruitment process tasks. All face-to-face interviews with key informants,
normally 2-4 persons per case study, were conducted onsite, digitally recorded, and
subsequently fully transcribed. The interviews lasted between 1 and 2 hours.
As the three case organizations used various technological solutions in the recruitment
process, I reviewed the functional characteristics of their e-recruitment systems and
interviewed representatives of the companies‟ technology providers. In addition, I made
a number of observations at two job fairs and two HR fairs in Denmark, where I had the
chance to meet and interview representatives of major job portals and job databases
used by the companies for online recruiting. Notes on observations and conversations
were then recorded.</p>
          <p>In order to get a more comprehensive idea of how online recruitment methods were
used at the studied companies, I analysed the content of corporate recruitment web
pages and the job ads that the case companies placed on their websites. Thus, a blend of
qualitative methods, techniques, and data sources available at the time of the research
were utilized during the study.</p>
          <p>The overall data analysis was deductive. The fully transcribed interviews were exported
to QSR nVivo - software for the analysis of qualitative data. Most of the brochures,
texts, and other secondary text data were scanned and also exported to the nVivo
project. The data were then sorted in sets for each case, coded, and triangulated. The
coding started with provisional categories, referring to recruitment tasks and subtasks,
and proceeded with more specific codes related to activities. The findings were then
summarized and analysed using the method of case-to-case comparison.
4
4.1</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Findings</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Scandifin</title>
        <p>Scandifin is a corporation consisting of Scandinavian banks, insurance companies and
investment funds, merged and incorporated in 2000. Its main activities include personal
and corporate banking, capital markets, savings and asset management, and running
pension funds. With a customer base of around 10 million, Scandifin is one of the 15
largest private financial institutions in Europe. It runs 1400 bank branches in
Scandinavia and Eastern Europe and has a total full-time staff of 33,000 employees.
The recruitment team in this study was based at Scandifin‟s headquarters, in the HR
department under the supervision of the senior HR partner. The team handled all
Scandifin‟s recruitment in Denmark, including temporary jobs and traineeships. Job ads,
including online ones, were the main recruitment source for around 300 to 500
vacancies a year.</p>
        <p>The Danish office started using corporate websites and Internet job advertising as a
recruitment source in the late 1990s. In the early 2000s, Scandifin acquired an
erecruitment system from a Scandinavian application service provider (ASP), which also
hosted and serviced the system. This meant that it could be quickly implemented, since
it did not require any installation and maintenance onsite. Scandifin merely had to link
its career website to the e-recruitment system when posting new job ads. The system
was web-based, and, using a standard Internet browser and a login, it gave instant
access to data from any location with a computer and Internet connection. From then
on, Scandifin no longer accepted paper-based applications, and systematically directed
prospective applicants to their career website for further information and submission of
applications, whether unsolicited or for an advertised position.</p>
        <p>According to the interviewed recruiters, Scandifin‟s career website became an efficient
source of communication with candidates. One of the interviewees said: “... On our
website one can log in and subscribe to [receive] job announcements. This is one of the
first functionalities we implemented, and we have continued doing this for 10 years... At
some point we reached 3000 subscribed users... It is a very effective place for hiring,
say, students... Student jobs can be 100 different things, and once they find out which
job they want, they can write an application explaining why they think they are the right
ones for the jobs. For many years we have not processed unsolicited applications for
student jobs...instead we ask them [i.e. students] to keep an eye on our website where all
jobs announcements get posted, and where it is easy to subscribe to email
notifications...” (own translation).</p>
        <p>Most of Scandifin‟s job ads were placed on the corporate career website and a number
of job portals. Sometimes, recruiters chose to use printed media for advertising jobs,
although this was for other reasons than attracting applications from qualified
candidates. Scandifin‟s use of printed media was mainly for reasons of employer
branding and maintenance of corporate reputation. One of the interviewed recruitment
partners explained why Scandifin still used printed media: “... If there is a vacancy, e.g.
in Aarhus or Skive, and there is a local free newspaper distributed weekly to all
households, then sometimes our local branches place a job ad there. You could say that
this is a bit of local marketing...There are also industry magazines... Most employees in
Danish financial institutions receive NN (a financial magazine) 10 times a year, but
placing a [job] ad there does not usually generate any applications …” (own
translation).</p>
        <p>Overall, Scandifin‟s recruiters were satisfied using e-recruitment in the recruitment
process. The main benefits mentioned were streamlined communication with applicants,
less paper administration, ease of accessing applicant data, reduced labour intensity in
processing résumés, and a shorter recruitment cycle.
4.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Danadrinco</title>
        <p>Danadrinco is part of an international group of companies, with more than 45,000
fulltime employees in 25 countries. The company has 2,000 employees in Denmark, mainly
in running corporate headquarters, production, and the distribution of alcoholic and
nonalcoholic beverages.</p>
        <p>In 1996, Danadrinco introduced an e-recruitment system supplied by a major
international HR technology and Internet job portal provider. The system was used for
all Danadrinco‟s internal and external recruitment, including when handled by a third
party, e.g. employment agencies and search bureaus. As explained by the company
recruiters, the main reason was purely administrative - to keep track of all new
employees and their flow and status.</p>
        <p>The recruitment partners and their assistants worked out of the HR department, carrying
out a number of HR-related tasks. Annually, they handled 130-150 recruitments, of
which about 100 were sourced externally through job advertising. The majority of job
ads were placed online on Danadrinco‟s corporate recruitment webpage and external
Internet job portals. One of Danadrinco‟s recruitment partners described Danadrinco‟s
choice of sources in the following way: “... 80% of all vacancies are sourced through
the Internet and the remaining 20 through head-hunters... Of the job ads which we place
during a standard recruitment process, only 5% are placed in printed media. And this is
a drastic change compared with just 5 years ago. Basically, either we do it on the
Internet, or we go to a head-hunter...” (own translation).</p>
        <p>All incoming applications to Danadrinco were sent electronically. The corporate career
webpage could either be used to apply for a concrete vacancy or to send an unsolicited
application. Each application submission was automatically confirmed by email. The
erecruitment system was web-based, and Danadrinco‟s recruiters and line managers
could access vacancy-related data and incoming applications from any geographical
location through a web browser.
Danadrinco‟s recruiters were generally satisfied with the e-recruitment system. The
benefits mentioned included a reduced administrative burden, shorter recruitment lead
time, ease of follow-up on each case and individual applicant, and the benefits of
outsourcing some applicant screening and communication tasks to line managers. One
of Danadrinco‟s recruitment partners recalled his previous experience with another
employer: “...What I like most [about the e-recruitment system] is that it saves you from
the administrative part. I remember my time with company N, where we counted how
many times we typed the names and addresses of job applicants, and we managed to use
7 different systems during the process, for letters of acknowledgement, thank you
letters, etc. The new system saves you from all this...” (own translation).
The disadvantages of using e-recruitment mentioned included the increased number of
unqualified applicants, limitations imposed by job portals on the size and design of the
job ads, and the lack of personal contact with applicants.
4.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Energowing</title>
        <p>Energowing is a multidivisional MNC with headquarters in Denmark. Its core business
comprises R&amp;D, and the manufacture, sale and maintenance of energy systems.
The recruitment team in this study came from one of Energowing‟s divisions in its core
business operations. Recruiters were placed in the divisional HR department and
reported to the divisional HR Partner, and Energowing‟s corporate vice president and
corporate employer brand manager.</p>
        <p>Energowing‟s recruiters used a wide range of recruitment sources in their staffing
activities. The corporate career website and a number of Internet-based job portals were
the main recruiting sources for external candidates. The corporate career website
received the special attention of the corporate employer brand manager, who was
responsible for conceptual design, content and updating. Unlike the other two
companies, Energowing used professional online communities like LinkedIn for its
employer-branding activities and job advertising. At the same time, Energowing had a
strict corporate policy, which prohibited using online social networks, e.g. Facebook
and MySpace, for either branding or recruitment.</p>
        <p>Energowing used an e-recruitment system which was a modular part of a wider
enterprise resource planning (ERP) system implemented universally throughout the
company in Denmark and abroad. The system was installed centrally onsite and
maintained by highly qualified IT personnel, and none of the company‟s units were
allowed to make adjustments or changes. The interviewed recruiters expressed general
satisfaction with the possibilities and functioning of the e-recruitment system, but
complained about the system‟s complexity and excessive functionality, which in their
view had a negative effect on the application experience of prospective candidates.
Unlike Scandifin and Danadrinco, at the time of the study Energowing continued to
receive paper-based applications, though recruiters had to register and file them in the
erecruitment system manually. One of the HR partners explained the reason for this
:”...There are not a lot of them [i.e. paper-based applications], and we receive them
primarily from factory workers... It is OK that they are on paper. So we type them in
ourselves. We do not ask candidates to do this, because I think that it‟s just arrogant.
We cannot tell them that we want their applications but they must go home and submit
them through the website. You just can‟t do that ...” (own translation).
Another concern about the e-recruiting system was the apparent lack of a personalized
response to rejected applicants. As one of the recruiters put it: “I think that candidates
feel like that they are just a number in a row, especially if they are not selected for the
first interview. We have actually considered conducting telephone interviews with all
the qualified candidates just to be closer to them... Even if they are rejected, a telephone
interview might give them a positive image of Energowing anyway... It is important to
me that applicants receive an explanation for why they were not hired, instead of just
being rejected through the e-recruitment system. So, I would say that the main weakness
of such a system is that candidates may feel impersonalized” (own translation).
However, the same recruitment partner admitted that, due to the growing number of
applications submitted electronically, telephoning all applicants was not feasible.
4.4</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Case-by-case comparison of the recruitment process</title>
        <p>A case-by-case comparison of the three companies‟ recruitment process, involving
similarities and differences in tasks, subtasks and activities, is summarised in Table 3.
As can be seen from the summary, in all three companies, there were no e-recruitment
activities prior to the task of attracting applicants. E-recruitment systems were then used
for the preparation and submission of job advertisements from the system interface,
enabling previous texts and job descriptions to be easily reused and reformatted for new
vacancies and potentially new e-recruitment sources.</p>
        <p>Online or web-based recruiting was the main recruitment source for the studied
recruitment processes. All three case companies were largely reliant on their corporate
career websites, and used them for communicating with prospective applicants and as
the entry point for the online submission of job applications. All three companies had a
localised Danish career website with the possibility to submit applications for positions
outside the country. At Scandifin and Danadrinco, the task of providing and updating
the content was the responsibility of the HR departments at headquarters, while at
Energowing the career website was updated and maintained under the supervision of the
corporate employer brand manager. In all three companies, new job ads were posted
directly by divisional recruitment teams using their e-recruitment systems. All three
studied organizations also had long-term agreements with a number of major Danish
Internet-based job boards, and occasionally added other online sources, e.g. in the case
of Energowing, online professional communities and networks.</p>
        <p>Unlike with traditional paper-based recruitment, the processing and pre-screening of
incoming applications could start and run concurrently with the activities for attracting
candidates. As confirmed by the informants from the case companies, the screening of
résumés was often initiated by line managers even before the deadline for applications.
The timing and sequence of this subtask was strongly dependent on the line managers
themselves.</p>
        <p>None of the recruitment teams used automated screening of incoming applications; in
fact, all the recruiters in the study rejected this as an option. The rationale behind this
was well put by one of the informants from Scandifin: ... “We have 300-500 different
jobs with a job description. And in my opinion, if we are to think seriously about
screening questions, we have to look at each job individually, and also at each job
description. We then need to evaluate what is important for us to know [about the
candidates]... and the [screening] questions should be very precise and correctly
formulated so that we can get correct answers. And even then we may not get the
answers we want, as people interpret questions differently, and therefore also answer
differently... Therefore I think that it would be extremely resource-intensive to have to
formulate [screening] questions for each job” (own translation).</p>
        <p>In all three companies, communication with prospective candidates and job applicants
started with job advertisements being posted on the Internet. This was due to
jobseekers subscribing to automatic alerts on new job vacancies, which they received by
email and/or SMS. In addition, the companies‟ e-recruitment systems always sent an
email confirming that they had received a job application. By means of the automation
features of the e-recruitment systems, rejected candidates were often notified
immediately about the result of the pre-screening even before the vacancies were
formally filled. All three companies considered this to be an advantage, since it meant
that recruiters did not have to keep them waiting unnecessarily long just to hear that
they had not been selected for further assessment. In the case of Energowing, the system
allowed applicants to create individual web pages on the employer‟s server, where they
could submit their files and monitor the progress of their application. Recruiters were
uncertain how much this feature was used, however.</p>
        <p>After the pre-screening was completed, a number of candidates were contacted to
arrange further assessment and selection activities. E-recruitment systems were used for
this as well, but all the studied recruitment teams and their clients, i.e. line managers,
would normally do this by telephone, and would use the system only for scheduling and
tracking purposes. This electronic tracking ended with the employment of a selected
candidate.</p>
        <p>The technological solutions used by all three companies in the recruitment process
enabled individual recruitment data to be integrated with other HR information systems,
such as Talent Management and Employee Development systems, as well as with wider
ERP systems, but none of the companies made use of this . The reasons differed for
each company, and varied from the apparent lack of coordination between functional
units to differences in the employee data required by departments.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>Task</title>
        <sec id="sec-3-5-1">
          <title>No change.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-5-2">
          <title>No change.</title>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-6">
        <title>Attract applicants</title>
        <p>Recruiters choose among a number Scandifin: Specialised websites, e.g.
finanof online sources, e.g. job data- cial institutions and the state regulator are
bases and job portals, with which sometimes used as sources.
they have a long-term agreement.</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-1">
          <title>Changes in activities. No change in the nature of the task or the subtask.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-2">
          <title>Danadrinco: Job portals outside Denmark</title>
          <p>are sometimes used as sources.</p>
          <p>Energowing: Professional (though not
social) networks like LinkedIn are frequently
used as a source.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-3">
          <title>Prepare and place job</title>
          <p>announcement</p>
          <p>Recruitment personnel prepare and Scandifin: Job ads from the corporate
webplace job ads in the selected site are posted by Internet job portals and
sources, observing certain require- database systems.
ments, e.g. size restrictions, design
guidelines, graphic elements, etc.</p>
          <p>Job ads are posted on corporate
websites.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-4">
          <title>Danadrinco: Job ads are posted automati</title>
          <p>cally, through the e-recruitment system, in
Internet job portals and databases.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-5">
          <title>Changes in the sequence of tasks – the task of communicating with applicants starts here.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-6">
          <title>Process in- Receive, register, and</title>
          <p>coming appli- sort incoming
applicacations tions</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-7">
          <title>All incoming applications are re</title>
          <p>ceived and sorted automatically
through an e-recruitment system.
The subtask is fully or almost fully
automated.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-8">
          <title>Energowing: Job ads are forwarded by email to the selected Internet job portals and databases and posted by them.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-9">
          <title>Scandifin and Danadrinco: No paper-based applications accepted.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-10">
          <title>Energowing: Paper-based applications are registered and transferred into the e-recruitment system by an Energowing employee.</title>
          <p>Changes in the sequence of
subtasks, i.e. pre-screening may
commence simultaneously, as
well as continuation of the task
of communicating with
applicants.
Pre-screen and evaluate Line managers and recruiters
preapplicants screen and review applications
using the data stored in
erecruitment system. They identify
and rank a number of applicants to
continue through assessment and
selection. The rankings and
eventual comments are stored in the
erecruitment system.</p>
          <p>Communicate Inform applicants about Rejected applicants receive an
with appli- pre-screening results email sent through the
ecants recruitment system. Sometimes,
they are contacted by telephone.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-11">
          <title>Arrange interviews with Arrange further interviews, site shortlisted candidates visits, and test with them.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-12">
          <title>Scandifin and Danadrinco: Line managers are responsible.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-13">
          <title>Energowing: Recruitment partners are responsible.</title>
          <p>Scandifin: Line managers arrange
interviews by telephone.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-14">
          <title>Danadrinco: Further interviews are planned and arranged through electronic scheduling and e-calendar.</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-6-15">
          <title>Energowing: Recruitment partner arranges</title>
          <p>interviews by telephone.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p>In the three studied organizations, the traditional recruitment process was completely
replaced by e-recruiting. The investigation confirmed that the recruitment process as
described in Figure 1 no longer existed in the studied organizations in its original form
and design. The most significant differences identified were attributed to changes in the
sequence of tasks and subtasks, and their increased divisibility, as well as in the nature
of the related activities.</p>
      <p>The detailed analysis of the recruitment process in the three case companies has shown
that the introduction of e-recruitment affected process tasks and subtasks to a varying
extent. For example, the subtask of receiving, sorting and registering incoming
applications was significantly affected, since the e-recruitment systems did this
automatically, apart from the one case when recruiters had to register and type in
paperbased applications manually. Therefore, it can be concluded that this subtask is
irrelevant where an e-recruitment system has been introduced and applications are
accepted solely through the system‟s submission facility.</p>
      <p>
        Due to the affordances (don‟t quite know what you mean by „affordances‟ – do you
mean „cost‟ or „functionality‟ or „ease of use‟ or something completely different?) of the
technology, communication with current applicants started simultaneously with the
posting of job ads, and continued through the entire recruitment process. Apart from the
apparent change in timing, the subtask of informing applicants about the pre-screening
results was transformed into the subtask of informing them about the progress of their
applications. Furthermore, in all case companies, the subtask of pre-screening incoming
applications was often initiated shortly after job advertisements were posted online.
This meant that the tasks of attracting applicants, processing applications and
communicating with candidates were often performed concurrently, supporting the
findings of Lee [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ]. However, this study found no evidence to support Cappelli‟s [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ],
Singh and Finn‟s [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>
        ] and Lee‟s [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ] assumption that the pre-screening of candidates
can be handled by sophisticated online systems, and none of the recruiters in the study
regarded this option as being feasible.
      </p>
      <p>
        According to the informants in the study, the introduction of e-recruitment has led to a
number of performance outcomes, most of which were considered positive. Many
informants mentioned the reduced costs of job advertising, improved recruitment lead
times, ease of communication with candidates, and exposure to a wider candidate pool.
The corporate websites were also very much appreciated as an effective way of
branding the companies as an attractive place to work. These findings correspond with
the results of Parry and Tyson [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>
        ] and a number of other research contributions.
Traditional paper-based recruitment by means of job advertising, as shown in Figure 1,
is often viewed as a discrete, fixed process [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ], initialized by an apparent need and
request for new employees. It consists of tasks and subtasks which are fairly
welldefined and repeated for each new vacancy, but which are sequential and not easily
divisible. Such process design is viewed by organizational design researchers as being
complicated, since it requires the coordination of connected processes and continuous
attention [7: 111-114]. The recruitment process investigated in the study rests on the
process design, which is characterised by a high level of repetitiveness and a medium to
high level of divisibility, as a number of tasks and subtasks can run con-currently, or
even be performed independently. Such task design can be defined as orderly [7:
112113]. The orderly design has a major advantage over the complicated design in its task
divisibility, inasmuch as problems encountered in performing one task do not
necessarily prevent progress in other tasks. This therefore requires less coordination and
is more efficient (ibid.).
      </p>
      <p>One of the highly divisible tasks, which emerged together with the spread of the Internet
and the use of e-recruiting, is that of maintaining career websites. This is an ongoing
task and is independent of individual hiring cycles, yet it is interrelated with the
objectives and outcomes of each individual recruitment cycle. Therefore, the task of
maintaining corporate career websites is added to the new recruitment process, as
shown in Figure 3. The move from complicated to more orderly task design might
explain why recruiters in all three companies reported a reduced administrative burden
and less coordination of the recruitment process.</p>
      <p>As can be seen in Figure 3, with the new process, the task of communicating with
candidates becomes one of the focal tasks, because it “binds” several tasks and subtasks
in the process and is performed practically throughout the entire recruitment process.
This may explain why, in two cases companies, HR departments were hiring
communication experts, e.g. an Employer Brand manager at Energowing and a new
graduate in corporate communications at Scandifin, suggesting changes in required
skills and personnel competencies.
6</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Limitations and implications</title>
      <p>The above research has some limitations. The main purpose of the study was to
determine whether the introduction of e-recruitment had affected the overall recruitment
process. Therefore it did not address in depth any changes related to management,
formal and informal structures of the recruiting teams, etc. Although applicants are the
other major player in the recruiting process [2:7], they were not included in this study
either. Furthermore, the reasons for adopting e-recruitment were not investigated.
Practitioners considering introducing online recruiting and e-recruitment systems might
feel apprehensive about the less consecutive nature of the recruitment tasks in the new
process and the need to learn a new technology. However, this study does not reveal any
specific problems for HR professionals using various e-recruitment technologies, and
none of my respondents reported or complained about being forced to learn a lot of new
technology. On the contrary, the e-recruitment systems were very easy to use, and when
hosted by an external ASP, were up and running in literally no time. However, as
communication with applicants plays a more significant role in the new process,
recruiters should be aware of the increased demands associated with this task. In
particular, special attention should be given to activities related to Internet
communications and automated mailing. This was a concern expressed by many
recruiters, and two of the case organizations made extra resources and specially
educated staff available to deal with the issues of online communications.</p>
      <p>Traditional recruitment
process using job advertising</p>
      <p>Recruitment process with e-recruitment</p>
      <p>Identify
Applicants</p>
      <p>Attract</p>
      <p>Applicants</p>
      <p>Maintain Corporate</p>
      <p>Career Website
Process Incoming</p>
      <p>Applications
Communicate with</p>
      <p>Applicants
Assessment and</p>
      <p>
        Selection
The Business Process Change (BPC) model presented in Figure 2 suggests that, if there
are changes in one of the subsystems, i.e. technology, personnel, management and
structures, then the other subsystems will be also affected. This is a potential starting
point for research into organizational design and management of HR departments and
recruitment teams, and would address the question of how e-recruitment affects these
subsystems. Lee [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ], for instance, argues that management practices evolve together
with e-recruitment systems. And Cappelli [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] suggests that changes related to the
introduction of e-recruitment may be manifested in a decentralization of the hiring
function, where line managers can find their candidates on job boards and other
vendors. These propositions may constitute some relevant avenues for future research.
This study finds that, although line managers began playing a bigger role in the tasks of
pre-screening and communicating with candidates, there was no evidence to suggest
that they were performing recruitment activities without the involvement of their
recruitment partners.
      </p>
      <p>
        Research at the macro-level can contribute to the field by determining how
environmental factors attributed to society in general, e.g. culture, regulations, etc.,
affect organizations‟ recruitment strategies and practices. For example, Cappelli [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]
argues that on-line recruiting is more than just an HR tool, but represents a change in
the culture of how to get hired. If this is true, then companies without an
e-recruitmentenabled process of hiring will have to review their strategies and practices to conform to
the norms of the society in which they operate.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Anderson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Applicant and Recruiter Reactions to New Technology in Selection: A Critical Review</article-title>
          and Agenda for Future Research
          <source>International Journal of Selection and Assessment</source>
          ,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          /3),
          <fpage>15</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1998</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Recruiting Employees</article-title>
          . Sage Publications.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bartram</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Internet Recruitment</article-title>
          and Selection: Kissing Frogs to Find Princes,
          <source>International Journal of Selection and Assessment</source>
          ,
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>261</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>274</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Borstorff</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bennett</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Online Recruitment: Attitudes and Behaviours of Job Seekers</article-title>
          , Journal of Strategic E-commerce,
          <volume>5</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          &amp;2),
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>23</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Braddy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Meade</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Michael</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fleenor</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Internet Recruiting: Effects of Website Content Features on Viewers' Perceptions of Organizational Culture</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Selection and Assessment</source>
          ,
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>19</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>34</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Breaugh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Starke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ). Research on Employee Recruitment:
          <article-title>So Many Studies, So Many Remaining Questions</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>26</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>405</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>434</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Burton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , DeSanctis,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            , &amp;
            <surname>Obel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>B.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Organizational Design: A Step-byStep Approach</article-title>
          . Cambridge University Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cappelli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Making the Most of on-Line Recruiting</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Harvard Business Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>79</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>139</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>146</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cober</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brown</surname>
          </string-name>
          , D. J.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Keeping</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Levy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Recrutiment on the Net: How Do Organizational Web Sites Characteristics Influence Applicant Attraction?</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>30</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>23</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davenport</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Short</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1990</year>
          ).
          <source>The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign, Sloan Management Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>31</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>11</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dessler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <article-title>: A Framework for Human Resource Management. Pearson Education Inc</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eisenhardt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1989</year>
          ).
          <source>Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>532</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>550</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eisenhardt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Graebner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Academy of Management Journal</source>
          ,
          <volume>50</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>25</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>32</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ettinger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wilderom</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp; van Dick,
          <string-name>
            <surname>R.</surname>
          </string-name>
          , (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Utilizing the Lead User Method for Promoting Innovation in E-Recruiting. in "Handbook of Research on E-Transformation and Human Resources Management Technologies: Organizational Outcomes and Challenges"</article-title>
          (Bondarouk,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Oiry</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>GuiderdoniJourdain</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            , and
            <surname>Ruel</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H., Eds.), IGI Global, Hershey, PA.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fitzgerald</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dopson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <source>Comparative Case Study Designs: Their Utility and Development in Organizational Research. in "The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods" (Buchanan</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            , and
            <surname>Bryman</surname>
          </string-name>
          , A., Eds.), SAGE, London, UK.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goldberg</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Allen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Black and White and Read All Over: Race Differences in Reactions to Recruitment Web Sites</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Human Resource Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>47</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>217</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>236</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Halperin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Fall and Rise of Recruiting</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Corporate Recruiting Leadership</source>
          ,
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>8</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>16</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>19</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hartley</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , (
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Case Study Research. in "Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research"</article-title>
          (Cassell,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            , and
            <surname>Birkbeck</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.S., Eds.), SAGE, London.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kay</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Recruiters Embrace the Internet</article-title>
          , InformationWeek, (
          <volume>778</volume>
          ),
          <fpage>72</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>76</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Keen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. G. W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1981</year>
          ).
          <source>Information Systems and Organizational Change</source>
          ,
          <source>Communications of the ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>9</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kettinger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grover</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Toward a Theory of Business Process Change Management</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Management Information Systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>9</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>31</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kettinger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Teng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. T. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guha</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1997</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools</article-title>
          , MIS Quarterly,
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>55</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>98</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          [23]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lawrence</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sauser</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sauser</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W. I. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Recruiting Strong Applicants: Process, Prospects, Challenges in "Human Resource Management: Contemporary Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities" (Sims, R</article-title>
          .R., Ed., Information Age Publishing.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          [24]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leavitt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , (
          <year>1965</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Applying Organizational Change in Industry: Structural, Technological and Humanistic Approaches. in "Handbook of Organizations" (March</article-title>
          , J.G., Ed.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rand</surname>
            <given-names>McNally</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Chicago, Ill.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          [25]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Evolution of E-Recruiting: A Content Analysis of Fortune 100 Career Web Sites</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations</source>
          ,
          <volume>3</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>57</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>68</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          [26]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>An Architecture for a Next-Generation Holistic</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>E-Recruiting</surname>
            <given-names>System</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Communications of the ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>50</volume>
          (
          <issue>7</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>81</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>85</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          [27]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stasinskaya</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Data Warehousing Management Issues in Online Recruiting</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Human Systems Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          [28]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liviens</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chapman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Recruitment and Selection. in "The Sage Handbook of Human Resource Management "</article-title>
          (Bacon,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Wilkinson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Redman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            , and
            <surname>Snell</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S., Eds.), SAGE, London, UK.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          [29]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Maurer</given-names>
            <surname>Steven</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            , &amp;
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Y.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ). Developing
          <string-name>
            <surname>Effective E-Recruiting</surname>
            <given-names>Websites</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Insights for Managers from Marketers</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Business Horizons</source>
          ,
          <volume>50</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>305</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>305</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          [30]
          <string-name>
            <surname>McKenna</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Beech</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Human Resource Management Pearson Education Limited</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>
          [31]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Millmore</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lewis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Saunders</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thornhill</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Morrow</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Strategic Human Resource Management: Contemporary Issues</article-title>
          . .
          <source>Pearson Education Ltd. .</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation>
          [32]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Newell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Assessment, Selection and Evaluation. in "The Strategic Managing of Human Resources" (Leopold, J</article-title>
          ., and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Harris</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L., Eds.),
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pearson</surname>
            <given-names>Education</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Harlow, UK.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation>
          [33]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parry</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tyson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>An Analysis of the Use and Success of Online Recruitment Methods in the Uk</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Human Resource Management Journal</source>
          ,
          <volume>18</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>257</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>257</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation>
          [34]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parry</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp; Wilson,
          <string-name>
            <surname>H.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Factors Influencing the Adoption of Online Recruitment</article-title>
          , Personnel Review,
          <volume>38</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>655</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>673</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref35">
        <mixed-citation>
          [35]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ployhart</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Staffing in the 21st Century: New Challenges and Strategic Opportunities</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>32</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>868</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>897</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref36">
        <mixed-citation>
          [36]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ployhart</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schneider</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schmitt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Staffing Organizations: Contemporary Practice</article-title>
          and Theory Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref37">
        <mixed-citation>
          [37]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reynolds</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Information Systems for Managers</article-title>
          . West Publishing Company.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref38">
        <mixed-citation>
          [38]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Singh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Finn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <source>The Effects of Information Technology on Recruitment, Journal of Labor Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>395</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>408</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref39">
        <mixed-citation>
          [39]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sylva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mol</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ), E-Recruitment:
          <article-title>A Study into Applicant Perceptions of an Online Application System</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref40">
        <mixed-citation>
          [40]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Case Study Research: Design and Mehtods</article-title>
          . Sage Publications.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref41">
        <mixed-citation>
          [41]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zall</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Recruiting and the Internet</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Fleet Equipment</source>
          ,
          <volume>26</volume>
          (
          <issue>10</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>39</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>43</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>