<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>CEUR-WS.org</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1613-0073</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Design Characteristics of Virtual Learning Environments: An Ex- pert Study</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Daniel Mueller</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Saarland University</string-name>
          <email>s.strohmeier@mis.uni-saarland.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Germany d.mueller@mis.uni-saarland.de</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Stefan Strohmeier, Saarland University</institution>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2010</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>570</volume>
      <fpage>20</fpage>
      <lpage>21</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Virtual Learning Environments (VLE) constitute the current Information Systems (IS) category for electronically supported corporate training and development. Frequently supposed advantages of using VLE refer, for instance, to the efficiency, individuality, ubiquity, timeliness, and task orientation of learning. However, a crucial precondition of realizing such advantages is an appropriate systems design. Hence, the question which specific design characteristics actually characterize successful VLE is of specific interest for training and development practice. The current paper therefore addresses design characteristics by conducting an expert study which is based on a general theory of IS success and previous insights of the literature. As a result, a set of relevant, well-defined design characteristics is presented and discussed while implications for research and practice are derived.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Virtual Learning Environments</kwd>
        <kwd>Design Characteristics</kwd>
        <kwd>Expert Study</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>For decades, electronic learning systems constitute the basic enablers of corporate
elearning. Though designations as categorizations of such learning systems are rather
heterogeneous and also change over time, current systems can be pooled under the
rubric of Virtual Learning Environments (VLE), which can be understood as electronic
Information Systems (IS) for the administrative and didactical support of learning
processes in vocational settings by systematically providing corporate learners adequate
learning materials as well as corresponding collaboration facilities so as to develop
intended qualifications [e.g. 8, 42, 49]. The usage of such systems in corporate training
and development is commonly justified based on diverse advantages such as efficiency,
individuality, ubiquity, convenience, timeliness, cost efficiency and task orientation of
VLE-based learning [e.g. 15, 20, 41]. Such advantages may also explain the ever
increasing adoption of VLE in corporate training and development [e.g. 15, 19, 48].
However, the actual realization of such advantages crucially depends on several
preconditions, while the specific characteristics of the used VLE constitute a prominent
aspect. It is evident that only adequately designed VLE will offer the promising
potential for success, while ill designed systems may even cause harmful disadvantages.
This directly focuses on design characteristics of VLE as a crucial aspect of learning
success. Technically [e.g. 18] as managerially oriented literature [e.g.6, 7, 45]
congruently understands design characteristics as the set of those inherent information
system properties, which determine IS success (while IS success is differently
conceptualized as net benefits, user acceptance, or actual usage, among others). Though
termed "design" characteristics, such properties critical to the success of VLE gain
practical importance for the entire process of developing or else procuring,
implementing and applying VLE in organizations. It is not surprising that design
characteristics firstly are relevant for developing new VLE. Here design characteristics
offer a framework of requirements which mandatorily must be met by the future system
to assure its quality. Given that corporate VLE are getting purchased more and more
from external vendors, design characteristic also are relevant for the systems
procurement, since they offer a valuable set of selection criteria. Beyond development
and procurement, design characteristics may also instruct the technical implementation
process by defining technical implementation goals. Finally, design criteria offer
suitable evaluation criteria for already applied VLE, and hence support the inspection
and improvement of existing systems. Given the wide-spread and still increasing usage
of VLE, design characteristics of VLE hence are of relevance for a broader group of
technical and managerial decision makers in corporate training and development.
The current paper therefore aims at elaborating general VLE design characteristics. An
expert study is conducted for this purpose. As a general foundation for the study
theoretical bases are discussed first. In order to contribute to cumulative research and to
integrate the expert study with previous findings subsequently a review of previous
research is conducted. Based on this, the method of the expert study is exposed and the
results are presented and discussed. Finally, implications for practice and research are
derived.
2
2.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Expert Study</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Foundation</title>
        <p>
          As a clear explorative empirical method, expert studies usually are employed to gain
insights in topical domains which are theoretically not or at least not well developed and
hence, are not open to confirmative research. In certain respects, this applies also to
research into design characteristics of VLE. At least, there is no completely developed
theory of VLE design which would allow for a direct elicitation of the desired design
characteristics. However, alternative foundations may be found in more general theories
of – given the subject of the study – in the area of general IS design or general IS
success. In the recently flourishing area of IS design the necessity of a general theory of
IS design is well recognized [e.g. 14]. However, so far rather procedural models of
design research have been offered [e.g. 14, 35], while an explicit theory of IS design,
which directly unfolds design characteristics or at least allows to derivate design
characteristics, is missing at present. Conversely, in the area of general IS success there
are some recognized theories [e.g. 7, 45]. Since explaining success of IS such theories
mandatorily present a set of success predictors. As long as such success predictors
constitute or at least refer to IS characteristics, these theories can also be used to found
design characteristic research. In view of this possibility, in particular the IS success
model (ISSM) [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref37 ref4">6, 7, 40</xref>
          ] presents general success relevant IS characteristics and,
additionally, is repeatedly validated. Basically, ISSM offers three groups of success
predictors, namely, systems quality, information quality and service quality [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">6, 7</xref>
          ].
Visibly, systems quality understood as a set of features which refers to the system as
such, and information quality, understood as a set of features which refers to the content
of the system, constitute system-related characteristics and hence, are appropriate for
design characteristics research. Service quality, however, understood as a set of features
which refers to the user support, does visibly not constitute a characteristic of the
system itself, and hence is not appropriable. Transferred to VLE design characteristic,
the ISSM hence clarifies that system-related (features of the VLE as such) and
information-related (learning content of the VLE) constitute essential groups of design
characteristics. Being a general theory, ISSM however is not able to provide more
detailed information about VLE design characteristics. It is hence the task of the expert
study to ascertain systems as information-related design characteristics of VLE
empirically.
2.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Review</title>
        <p>In order to add to cumulative research and integrate the expert study with previous
findings a comprehensive review of previous research in design characteristics of VLE
was conducted. The review considered studies which directly deal with design
characteristic of VLE in an empirical or conceptual way. Extensive searches of
electronic databases (EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Scopus) as well as of selected
journals and conference websites were carried out to identify appropriate studies.
However, in order to assure the quality of results only outlets with double blind
peerreview were taken into account. To map existing studies comprehensively, a time frame
of 20 years (1989-2009) was analyzed. Based on this procedure 25 relevant studies
could be identified (these studies are marked with an asterisk in the references section
and are summarized in Appendix 1). The analysis of VLE design characteristics
identified within these studies yielded several interesting results.</p>
        <p>Firstly and unexpectedly, a plethora of over thirty different design characteristics could
be identified (for details see Appendix 1). Though this may be judged as ample results
of previous research, this abundance also represents a certain problem like an increasing
number of design characteristics detracted from there applicability and usefulness.
Hence, future research should strive for a limited set of major design characteristics
rather than amassing a maximum of design characteristics. Secondly, as predicted by
the ISSM, all identified design characteristics could by classified as either
systemrelated or information-related, while quite frequently systems quality and information
quality were presented as design characteristics. Whereas this constitutes a consent
concerning the general design characteristics, there is dissent concerning more concrete
design characteristics within these groups. This heterogeneity adds to the problem of the
mere number, since it is still unclear which concrete design characteristics actually are
relevant for success. Hence, it is necessary to validate design characteristics to attain a
set of resilient characteristics. Thirdly, the design characteristics found are of rather
different granularities, understood as the grade of operativeness and detailedness of
design characteristics. Basically, very general, coarse-granular characteristics such as
the mentioned "systems quality" or "information quality" and rather medium-granular
characteristics such as "personalization" or "clear terminology" can be differentiated,
while fine-granular, detailed, i.e. very specific design characteristics could not be
detected. Granularity of design characteristics evidently is of major importance since
expressiveness and usability increase with granularity (for instance, ―develop/select/use
personalized VLE" constitutes a more expressive and usable statement than
―develop/select/use VLE with good systems quality‖). In view of this, at first glance one
may claim maximal granularity from the expert study, however increased specificity
commonly is aligned with a decreasing range of validity. Hence, to warrant general
validity the expert study may have to get by with a medium granularity. Fourthly, there
is a prevalent lack of explicit definitions of design characteristics (while there are some
exceptions). Since the design characteristic presented, such as ―perceived flexibility",
represent rather complex constructs which can be understood in quite different ways,
the lack of definition aggravates the understanding of design characteristics as well as
their further usage. It also complicates the detection of possible redundancies of
characteristics found in different studies such as ―personalization‖ and ―user
adaptation‖. Hence, the expert study mandatorily has to elaborate thorough and explicit
definitions of design characteristics.</p>
        <p>In summary, previous research suggests a set of design characteristics which is copious,
of limited congruence, of different granularity, and frequently unclear in meaning. This
clearly justifies the necessity of the expert study. However, instead of just adding a
further unconnected study, the current state of knowledge is to be used as a base to
contrast but also enrich the expert study and thereby integrate it with previous work.
2.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Method</title>
        <p>To ascertain success relevant system- as well as information-related characteristics of
VLE with an expert study systematically, the Delphi method was considered as
promising approach [e.g. 11, 12, 13, 22]. Besides supporting practical forecasting and
practical decisions, the Delphi method is also appropriate for systematically analyzing
complex and multifaceted scientific topics that are not directly and easily accessible via
quantitative research approaches [e.g. 11]. To ascertain relevant design characteristics
systematically, a two-phased approach was performed.</p>
        <p>Phase I was aimed at a general inquiry and categorization of generally imaginable
design characteristics. As a starting point of phase I, a group of appropriate experts was
to be appointed. Participants were selected based on different criteria, while it was
intended to arrange an international group of experts with extensive knowledge in the
design of VLE which is of diverse disciplinary provenience (computer science,
management, pedagogy, and psychology), and diverse institutional affiliation
(universities and private companies). The resulting group consisted of 13 international
experts with different affiliation and backgrounds (see Appendix). Subsequently, an
online-questionnaire was developed. Beside the provision of a general introduction into
the questionnaire, relevant terms such as VLE or design characteristic were thoroughly
defined in order to assure a consistent understanding of constructs and questions. In so
doing, the questions referred to the creation of a comprehensive list of design
characteristics in general, and to subsequently match this list to a categorization of
system- and information-related design characteristics of VLE. Balancing the trade-off
between specificity and validity it was asked for characteristics which were specific, but
generally valid. To avoid mere adjective lists with undefined and hence unclear
constructs, experts were explicitly encouraged to explain the stated design
characteristics in detail. The questionnaire was pre-tested and slightly modified based
on in-depth interviews with two experts. The online survey was carried out in autumn
2009, while all 13 experts participated.</p>
        <p>
          A monitoring team of five independent researchers individually evaluated the results
obtained in phase I. In particular, based on the construct explanations synonymous
design characteristics were identified and adjusted, the adjusted set of design
characteristics was summarized respectively aggregated according to the principles of
―summarizing content analysis‖ [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">31</xref>
          ], and finally, general definitions for the
summarized design characteristics were derived from the expert explanations. In a
subsequent group discussion, individual results of the monitoring team members were
mutually adjusted, while there was an initial high degree of inter-coder reliability [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">31</xref>
          ]
within the monitoring team anyway.
        </p>
        <p>
          During the preparation of phase II the result list of design characteristics of phase I was
compared with the results of the review of previous work. As there was substantial
agreement concerning several design characteristics, the result list from phase I missed
some of the design characteristics that proved to be significant for success. To be more
concrete, experts did not mention ―multimodal‖ [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27 ref33 ref35">30, 36, 38</xref>
          ], ―accessible‖ [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">30</xref>
          ],
―appealing‖ [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref13 ref24 ref35">3, 4, 16, 27, 38</xref>
          ], ―reliable‖ [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24 ref27 ref44">27, 30, 47</xref>
          ], ―secure‖ [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">30</xref>
          ] and ―structured‖ [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">3,
36</xref>
          ]. To test also the relevance of these characteristics, they were added to the results of
phase I. The resulting list of adjusted, aggregated, enriched, categorized and defined
design characteristics constituted the base of the second online-questionnaire. The 13
experts this time were asked to rank the presented system- and information-related
design characteristics of VLE from highest (rank 1) to lowest (rank n) priority for
success. The resulting priority lists were summarized by calculating means and standard
deviations of the respective rank positions.
2.4
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>Results</title>
        <p>Interim results of phase I firstly revealed an unadjusted list of 55 design characteristics
(31 system-related, 24 information-related). This list was successively reduced by
adjustment of synonyms to 31 design characteristic (13 system-related, 16
informationrelated) and the summarizing of design characteristics to 16 design characteristics (10
system-related, 6 information-related).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>VLE Design Characteristic</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-6">
        <title>Learning-Process-Supportive A3. 4.46 (3.13)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-7">
        <title>A. System-Related</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-8">
        <title>Reliable</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-9">
        <title>Secure</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-10">
        <title>Interactive</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-11">
        <title>Appealing</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-12">
        <title>Transparent</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-13">
        <title>Structured</title>
        <p>A1. 3.08 (1.44)
A2. 4.38 (3.52)
A4. 4.77 (3.11)
A5. 5.08 (2.25)
A6. 5.15 (2.79)
A7. 5.92 (2.22)</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-14">
        <title>Platform-Independent A10. 7.62 (2.90) Standard-Supportive</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-15">
        <title>Accessible</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-16">
        <title>B. Information-Related</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-17">
        <title>Understandable</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-18">
        <title>Consistent</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-19">
        <title>Credible</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-20">
        <title>Challenging</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-21">
        <title>Multimodal</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-22">
        <title>Enjoyable</title>
        <p>A8. 6.46 (2.79)
A9. 6.85 (2.15)
B1. 2.23 (1.48)
B2. 2.92 (1.66)
B3. 3.23 (1.30)
B4. 3.54 (1.51)
B5. 4.00 (1.78)
B6. 4.58 (1.44)</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-1">
          <title>Design</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-2">
          <title>Characteristic</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-3">
          <title>A. System-Related</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-4">
          <title>Reliable</title>
          <p>As depicted this list was enriched with 7 literature-based characteristics (6
systemrelated, 1 information-related).</p>
          <p>Final results are rendered in Table 1 and 2. Table 1 firstly depicts the results of the
prioritization process in phase II by presenting the mean values and the standard
deviations (in brackets).</p>
          <p>The derived definitions of these characteristics are presented in Table 2, while each
definition is illustrated with selected statements of the literature review and/or experts to
make their origin more transparent.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-5">
          <title>Definition</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-6">
          <title>Source</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-7">
          <title>Exemplary Statement</title>
          <p>
            VLE are reliable, if their
end-users/learners can
apply it without
technology owed
disturbances.
literature
review
―Whenever I use the
elearning tool, it always
works correctly.‖ [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">30</xref>
            ]
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-8">
          <title>LearningProcessSupportive</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-9">
          <title>Interactive</title>
          <p>VLE are secure, if the
system itself as well as
unauthorized users cannot
modify or delete the
learners' personal profile
data, respectively their
learning history, progress
(i.e. learning outcomes),
and corresponding</p>
          <p>resources.</p>
          <p>VLE are
learning-processsupportive if they support
the provision of (further)
learning activities and/or
materials with their
inherent information (e.g.
activity description and/or
instruction, etc.) according
to the learners‘ current</p>
          <p>status in the unit of
learning, and help the
learners to coordinate audit
dates, group meetings, etc.
VLE are interactive if they
allow for
learner-system(e.g. taking self-tests,
uploading assignments,
etc.), learner-learner-,
and/or
learner-teachercommunication and/or
collaboration (e.g. via</p>
          <p>
            ―[…] key to the learning
process are the interactions
among students themselves,
the interactions between
faculty and students, and the
collaboration in learning
that results from these
interactions.‖ [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31 ref33">34, 36</xref>
            ]
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-10">
          <title>Appealing</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-11">
          <title>Transparent</title>
          <p>
            ―The system enables users
to trace why and how
certain recommendations
are made, how much
personal data one allows the
system to data mine
implicitly/explicitly to
produce a user profile.‖
literature
review
―[…] the ease with which
users can move around the
system.‖ [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">23</xref>
            ]
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-12">
          <title>StandardSupportive</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-13">
          <title>Accessible</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-14">
          <title>PlatformIndependent</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-15">
          <title>B. Information-Related</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-16">
          <title>Understandable</title>
          <p>
            VLE are
standardsupportive, if they
facilitate learning materials
which are compiled based
on approved eLearning
standards such as IMS
Learning Design [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">17</xref>
            ], or
          </p>
          <p>SCORM [1] as these
eLearning standards enable</p>
          <p>learning materials to be
widely shared across VLE
which also support these</p>
          <p>standards.</p>
          <p>VLE are accessible, if
learners can access it
according to their own</p>
          <p>possibilities.</p>
          <p>VLE are
platformindependent, if they run on
a wide range of operating</p>
          <p>systems.</p>
          <p>The information provided
by VLE is understandable, literature
if the words, sentences, review
and abbreviations applied
within the learning
materials are clear in
meaning (e.g. by use of expert
definitions), easy to study
comprehend and easy to
read.
―Interoperability and
standards compliance‖
literature
review
expert
study</p>
          <p>
            ―The e-learning tool is
accessible according to my
own possibilities.‖ [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">30</xref>
            ]
―VLE should be
Webbased, not standalone.‖
―Terminology refers to the
words, sentences, and
abbreviations used by a
          </p>
          <p>
            system.‖ [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20 ref25">23, 28</xref>
            ]
―Understandability vs.
          </p>
          <p>complexity.‖</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-17">
          <title>Consistent</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-22-18">
          <title>Credible Challenging Multimodal Enjoyable</title>
          <p>textual value, and
consequently make the
learning experience more</p>
          <p>pleasant.
The present expert study provides a systematic set of well-defined, specific but
generally valid system- and information-related design characteristics based on the
ISSM and compatible to previous research results. Hence, the general objective of the
expert study could be satisfactorily achieved.</p>
          <p>Findings concerning the system-related design characteristics show that ―reliable‖ was
unambiguously rated as the most important system-related design characteristic,
followed by ―secure‖, ―learning-process-supportive‖, ―interactive‖, ―appealing‖,
―transparent‖, ―structured‖, ―standard-supportive‖, ―accessible‖, and
―platformindependent‖. It should be noted, ―interactive‖, ―appealing‖, and ―transparent‖ show
almost the same mean values, that may be a consequence of the prioritization procedure
within phase II as study participants were ―forced‖ to rank the given design
characteristics even though they may have preferred similar priorities of different design
characteristics. However, the salient disagreement amongst study participants
concerning the relative importance of ―secure‖ (SD: 3.52) as the second important
system-related design characteristic of VLE in particular might be engendered by its
diverse understanding (―[…] the system itself as well as unauthorized users cannot
modify or delete the learners' personal profile data […]‖, etc.). The same may count for
―learning-process-supportive‖ (SD: 3.13), ―interactive‖ (SD: 3.11) as well as
―transparent‖ (SD: 2.79) and ―standard-supportive‖ (SD: 2.79). Once again, this result
may originate in the way the prioritization procedure was conducted. It is noticeable,
amongst the five system-related design characteristics considered to be the most
important ones, rank number one (―reliable‖), two (―secure‖), and five (―appealing‖) are
design characteristics from the literature review which were added subsequently. This
shows that even though study participants did not even mention these system-related
design characteristics within the first survey wave, they considered them as
highlyrelevant system-related design characteristics of VLE. Thus, the prioritization of
preceding expert statements and theoretical-founded design characteristics proved to be
a feasible and promising approach. Hence, the set of system-related design
characteristics presented should always be under consideration when designing, and
evaluating VLE.</p>
          <p>Regarding information-related design characteristics, findings show that
―understandable‖, is considered to be the most important design characteristic, followed
by ―consistent‖, ―credible‖, ―challenging‖, multimodal as well as ―enjoyable‖. It should
be pointed out that not similar to their system-related counterparts, all
informationrelated design characteristics show high levels of agreement amongst study participants
regarding their relevance for VLE (SD spectrum: 1.30 - 1.78). Hence, when designing
and evaluating VLE one should consider the set of information-related design
characteristics presented.
To conclude, the results of the expert study presents a comprehensive set of VLE
specific information- and system-related design characteristics, which should be
considered when developing, purchasing, implementing or evaluating VLE.
3</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Implications</title>
      <p>The above-mentioned results should generally provide a basic starting point for future
research as design endeavors, while there are some implications for research as well as
practice.</p>
      <p>
        Concerning research implications, firstly, some further theoretical deliberations may
improve future research. The used ISSM is able to roughly categorize relevant design
characteristics, but however does not allow to deduce directly specific design
characteristics. This likely applies to further imaginable theoretical foundations, in
particular to the prominent TAM-approach, what could be proved within the frame of
the literature review (see e.g. the TAM-based studies of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">3, 38</xref>
        ]). Again, the basic TAM
does rarely directly propose concrete design characteristics. In order to overcome this
theoretical gap, more recent theoretical developments that are orientated towards design
and intervention (e.g. the TAM 3 offered by [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">45</xref>
        ]) may offer deeper foundations. In
addition, also amalgamations of such approaches with the ISSM may be worth of a trial
(see the example in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">32</xref>
        ]). Furthermore, given that expressiveness and usability of
design characteristics increase with growing specificity, future research should aim at
increasing specificity of design characteristics, however without losing general validity.
One imaginable way is to work out different facets of the design characteristics by
constituting sub-characteristics. For instance, based on the definitions elaborated certain
sub-characteristics of ―flexible‖, ―learning-process-supportive‖ or ―transparent‖ could
be established. As an important aspect considered by one previous study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">30</xref>
        ] and
confirmed in the expert study, possible interdependencies of design characteristics
should be taken into account. Basically, design characteristics may not be arbitrarily
combinable for logical and/or technical reasons [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">10</xref>
        ], hence, future research should also
strive for (in-)compabilities of design characteristics found. This also entails a question
that has not been tackled till now, whether different system- and information-related
design characteristics contribute rather individually and independently to VLE success,
or whether whole bundles or entire configurations of design characteristic are triggering
success. Moreover, given the benefits of an experimental design, such as controlling
relevant while excluding confounding variables, ensuring direct relevant experiences of
respondents, and, particularly enabling the manipulation of specific design
characteristics [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">21</xref>
        ], experimental designs seem to be a promising approach to ascertain
and evaluate relevant design characteristics empirically (cf. the pioneering work of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">36</xref>
        ]
who conducted an offline experiment to determine relevant design characteristics).
Finally, given the costs and duration of developing prototypes, and, all the more, full
versions of a VLE, it would be highly beneficial if relevant design characteristics could
be ascertained as early as possible, in order to avoid misconceptions and failure [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">5</xref>
        ].
Hence, the usage of simple prototypical models (paper prototypes, video mockups, etc.)
of the system planned may allow ascertaining relevant characteristics in very early
phases of the corresponding software development process [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">32</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Additionally, the results of the study yield some implications for practice. Managerial
and technical decision-makers in the process of developing new, selecting pre-packaged
VLE-software, or evaluating and improving already adopted VLE are offered a valuable
general (check-)list of criteria relevant for success. Beyond, with a particular view to
information-related design characteristics, learning designers and teaching staff may
profit from their application while preparing their learning materials. Hereby,
information-related design characteristics could also be understood as a checklist in how
far their learning materials fulfill the proposed requirements (e.g. understandable,
consistent, and credible learning materials).</p>
      <p>Refining and customizing this (check-)list towards individual corporate settings and
subsequently considering the list may lead to practical VLE design- and
selectionprocesses which minimize learner resistance, increase learner satisfaction, and support
overall learning success.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Within this paper a comprehensive literature review and an initial expert study were
carried out yielding a systematic list of well-defined system- and information-related
design characteristics of VLE. This hopefully will stimulate future research, especially
quantitative studies which evaluate and deepen the insights offered, but may also
instruct future practical development, selection and evaluation projects, while both
streams may finally contribute to improved VLE which support better corporate training
and development endeavors.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>References</title>
      <p>[1] ADL (2004), SCORM 4th Edition - Version 1.1 (Documentation), available at:
http://www.adlnet.gov/Technologies/scorm/SCORMSDocuments/2004%204th%20
Edition/Documentation.aspx, accessed on the 11th of April 2010.
[2] *Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction
with Internet-based MBA Courses, Journal of Management Education, 24 (1),
3254.
[3] *Chang, S.-C. &amp; Tung, F.-C. (2008). An Empirical Investigation of Students‘
Behavioural Intentions to Use the Online Learning Course Websites, British
Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (1), 71–83.</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>1) Literature Review – Results Overview</title>
        <p>Study</p>
        <p>Theory
TAM ISSM
…
X</p>
        <p>X
X
X
X</p>
        <p>System-Related
Information-Related</p>
        <p>System Quality
Information Quality</p>
        <p>System Quality
Information Quality</p>
        <p>System Quality
Information Quality</p>
        <p>System Quality
Information Quality</p>
        <p>System Quality</p>
        <p>Information Quality</p>
        <p>
          System Quality
Information Quality
Construct
Definition
13. [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">46</xref>
          ]
Information Quality
System Adaptability
        </p>
        <p>Perceived Course</p>
        <p>Interaction,</p>
        <p>Perceived Flexibility
(time, location, methods)
Screen Design</p>
        <p>Relevance,</p>
        <p>Terminology</p>
        <p>Personalization</p>
        <p>Content
eLearning Materials
Presentation Types:
1. Text-Audio,
2. Audio-Video,
3. Text-Audio-Video</p>
        <p>Screen Design,</p>
        <p>Navigation</p>
        <p>Terminology
System Functionality,
System Interactivity,
e-Learning Course Flexibility
(time, location, methods)
Course Quality
X</p>
        <p>Online Survey</p>
        <p>Format
Flexibility</p>
        <p>
          25. [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">33</xref>
          ]
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>2) Expert List</title>
        <sec id="sec-5-2-1">
          <title>Name</title>
          <p>Anh Vu, N.-N.
Christina, H.
Dominique, V.
Effie L.</p>
          <p>Elisabetta, P.
Jad, N.</p>
          <p>Kai, H.</p>
          <p>Luis, de la F.
Marvin, S.</p>
          <p>Milos, K.</p>
          <p>Patrick, P.</p>
          <p>Susanne, N.
Volker, Z.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>*</given-names>
            <surname>Chiu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.-M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Hsu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M.-H.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sun</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S.-Y.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.-C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sun</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.-C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ). Usability, Quality, Value and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
            <surname>-Learning Continuance</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Decisions</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Computers &amp; Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>45</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>399</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>416</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Venkatesh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Toward Preprototype User Acceptance Testing of New Information Systems: Implications for Software Project Management</article-title>
          ,
          <source>IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>51</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>31</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>46</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>DeLone</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>McLean</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1992</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Information Systems Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>3</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>60</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>95</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>DeLone</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>McLean</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Management Information Systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>19</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>9</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>30</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fry</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ketteridge</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marshall</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
          <article-title>: A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice, 3rd edition</article-title>
          . Routledge.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>*</given-names>
            <surname>Fu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.-L.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Chou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.-G.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Yu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>S.-C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Activate Interaction Relationships between Students Acceptance Behavior and E-Learning</article-title>
          , in G. Dong,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>J. Xu</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Yu (eds</article-title>
          .):
          <source>Joint 9th Asia-Pacific Web Conference (APWeb 2007) and 8th International Conference on Web-Age Information Management (WAIM</source>
          <year>2007</year>
          ), LNCS
          <volume>4505</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>670</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>677</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Galletta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lederer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1989</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Some Cautions on the Measurement of User Information Satisfaction</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Decision Sciences</source>
          ,
          <volume>20</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>419</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>439</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grisham</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Delphi Technique: A Method for Testing Complex</article-title>
          and Multifaceted Topics,
          <source>International Journal of Managing Projects in Business</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>112</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>130</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Haeder</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          ):
          <article-title>Delphi-Befragungen: Ein Arbeitsbuch</article-title>
          .
          <source>VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Haeder</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Haeder</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Die Delphitechnik in den Sozialwissenschaften: Mehtodische Forschungen und innovative Anregungen</article-title>
          . Westdeutscher Verlag.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hevner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>March</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S. T.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Park</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ram</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
          <source>Design Science in Information Systems Research</source>
          , MIS Quarterly,
          <volume>28</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>75</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>105</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15] *Holsapple,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. W.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Lee-Post</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ). Defining, Assessing, and
          <source>Promoting ELearning Success: An Information Systems Perspective, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>67</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>85</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16] *Hong,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Thong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. Y. L.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Wong</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.-M.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>TAM</surname>
          </string-name>
          , K.-Y. (
          <year>2001</year>
          -
          <fpage>2002</fpage>
          ).
          <article-title>Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Management Information Systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>18</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>97</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>124</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>IMS</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ),
          <source>‗IMS Learning Design Information Model - Version 1</source>
          .0 (
          <issue>Final Specification)</issue>
          ', available at: http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/ imsld_infov1p0.html,
          <source>accessed on the 11th of April</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <article-title>ISO/IEC (</article-title>
          <year>2005</year>
          ), ‗ISO/IEC 25000:
          <article-title>Software Product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)'</article-title>
          , available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/ catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.
          <source>htm?csnumber=35683, accessed on the 11th of April</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Johnson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R. D.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gueutal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Falbe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ). Technolgy, Trainees,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Metacognitive</given-names>
            <surname>Activity</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>E-Learning</surname>
            <given-names>Effectiveness</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Managerial Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>545</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>566</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kiser</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1999</year>
          ).
          <article-title>10 Things We Know so far about Online Training</article-title>
          , Training,
          <volume>36</volume>
          (
          <issue>11</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>66</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>74</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Koenigstorfer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ):
          <article-title>Akzeptanz von technologischen Innovationen: Nutzungsentscheidungen von Konsumenten dargestellt am Beispiel von mobilen Internetdiensten</article-title>
          . Gabler.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Landeta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <source>Current Validity of the Delphi Method in Social Sciences, Technological Forecasting and Social Change</source>
          ,
          <volume>73</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>467</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>482</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [23] *Lee,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Dahlan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Ramayah</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Karia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Hasmi Abu Hassan Asaari</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Impact of Interface Characteristics on Digital Libraries Usage</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>9</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [24] *Lee,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Y.-C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>An Empirical Investigation into Factors Influencing the Adoption of an E-Learning System</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Online Information Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>30</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>517</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>541</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [25] *Liaw,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.-S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Chang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W.-C.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hung</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W.-H. &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.-M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Attitudes toward Search Engines as a Learning Assisted Tool: Approach of Liaw and Huang's Research Model</article-title>
          , Computers in Human Behavior,
          <volume>22</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>177</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>190</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          [26] *Liaw,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.-S.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Huang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>H.-M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <article-title>An Investigation of User Attitudes toward Search Engines as an Information Retrieval Tool</article-title>
          , Computers in Human Behavior,
          <volume>19</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>751</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>765</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          [27]
          <string-name>
            <surname>*Lin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.-F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Measuring Online Learning Systems Success: Applying the Updated DeLone</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>McLean</given-names>
            <surname>Model</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Cyber Psychology &amp; Behavior</source>
          ,
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>817</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>820</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          [28]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lindgaard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1994</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Usability Testing and System Evaluation: A Guide for Designing Useful Computer Systems</article-title>
          . Chapman &amp; Hall.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          [29] *Liu,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.-H.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Liao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.-L.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Peng</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.-J.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online E-Learning Users' Acceptance Behavior</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Issues in Information Systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>6</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>175</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>181</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          [30]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>*</given-names>
            <surname>Martínez-Torres</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M. R.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Toral</given-names>
            <surname>Marín</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Barrero Garciá</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Gallardo Váquez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Arias</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oliva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Torres</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>T.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A Technological Acceptance of ELearning Tools Used in Practical and Laboratory Teaching, according to the European Higher Education Area</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Behaviour &amp; Information Technology</source>
          ,
          <volume>27</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>495</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>505</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          [31]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mayring</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken</article-title>
          , Vol.
          <volume>8</volume>
          . Beltz.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          [32]
          <string-name>
            <surname>*Mueller</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zimmermann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ). A
          <string-name>
            <surname>Learner-Centered</surname>
            <given-names>Design</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Implementation, and Evaluation Approach of Learning Environments to Foster Acceptance,
          <source>International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>50</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>57</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          [33]
          <string-name>
            <surname>*Nov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ye</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Users' Personality and Perceived Ease of Use of Digital Libraries: The Case for Resistance to Change</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of the America Society for Information Science and Technology</source>
          ,
          <volume>59</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>845</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>851</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>
          [34]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Palloff</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pratt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1999</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom</article-title>
          . Jossey-Bass.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation>
          [35]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Peffers</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tuunanen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rothenberger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chatterjee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <source>A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research, Journal of Management Information Systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>45</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>77</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation>
          [36] *Pituch,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Lee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Y.-K.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <source>The Influence of System Characteristics on ELearning Use</source>
          ,
          <source>Computers &amp; Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>47</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>222</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>244</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation>
          [37] *Poelmans,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Wessa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Mills</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Bloemen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Doom</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Usability and Acceptance of E-Learning in Statistics Education, based on the Compendium Platform</article-title>
          , International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI
          <year>2008</year>
          ),
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>10</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref35">
        <mixed-citation>
          [38] *Roca,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Chiu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.-M.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Martínez</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>F. J.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Understanding E-Learning Continuance Intention: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Human-Computer Studies</source>
          ,
          <volume>64</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>683</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>696</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref36">
        <mixed-citation>
          [39] *Sahin,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Shelley</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Considering Students' Perceptions: The Distance Education Student Satisfaction Model</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Educational Technology &amp; Society</source>
          ,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>216</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>223</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref37">
        <mixed-citation>
          [40]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Seddon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1997</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success'</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Information Systems Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>240</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>253</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref38">
        <mixed-citation>
          [41]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sitzmann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kraiger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stewart</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wisher</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Comparative Effectiveness of Web-based and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Classroom Instruction</surname>
            :
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Meta-Analysis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Personnel Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>59</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>623</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>64</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref39">
        <mixed-citation>
          [42]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Strohmeier</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ): Informationssysteme im Personalmanagement: Architektur - Funktionalität - Anwendung. Vieweg+Teubner.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref40">
        <mixed-citation>
          [43] *Sun, P.-C.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tsai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Finger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Y.-Y. &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yeh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>What Drives a Successful E-Learning? An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction'</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers &amp; Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>50</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>1183</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1202</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref41">
        <mixed-citation>
          [44]
          <string-name>
            <surname>*Tobing</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hamzah</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sura</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Amin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Assessing the Acceptability of Adaptive E-Learning System</article-title>
          ,
          <source>5th International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society</source>
          ,
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>10</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref42">
        <mixed-citation>
          [45]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Venkatesh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp; Bala,
          <string-name>
            <surname>H.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <source>Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions, Decision Sciences</source>
          ,
          <volume>39</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>273</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>315</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref43">
        <mixed-citation>
          [46] *Wang, W.-T. &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.-C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>An Empirical Study of Instructor Adoption of Web-based Learning Systems</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Computers &amp; Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>53</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>761</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>774</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref44">
        <mixed-citation>
          [47] *Wang,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Y.-S.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Assessment of Learner Satisfaction with Asynchronous Electronic Learning Systems</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Information &amp; Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>41</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>75</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>86</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref45">
        <mixed-citation>
          [48] *Wang,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.-S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.-Y. &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Measuring E-Learning Systems Success in an Organizational Context: Scale Development and Validation</article-title>
          , Computers in Human Behavior,
          <volume>23</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>1792</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1808</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref46">
        <mixed-citation>
          [49]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weller</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <article-title>: Virtual Learning Environments: Using, Choosing and Developing Your VLE</article-title>
          . Routledge.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref47">
        <mixed-citation>
          [50] *Yeung,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Jordan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>E.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Continued Usage of Business E-Learning Courses in Hong Kong Corporations</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Education and Information Technologies</source>
          ,
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>175</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>188</lpage>
          . Accessibility, Communicativeness, Feedback, Interactivity and Control, Reliability, User adaptation, User tools
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>