<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Applying a Multi-gated News Model to a Social Web</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ying-Ying Chen</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Taiwan Language and Communication, National United University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>1, Lienda, Miaoli</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="TW">Taiwan</country>
          <addr-line>36003</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2010</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>2</fpage>
      <lpage>8</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Traditional Newspapers have been struggling to find a new business model to economically survive in this new wave of digital social revolution. This study uses ontology of a multi-gated model to suggest that program designers use different kinds of most popular news cues to satisfy diverse citizens' needs. Different concepts of citizens are discussed theoretically in exploring how a social semantic perspective based on various meanings of news cues might help news users to participate or disseminate news stories by social media.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>news cues</kwd>
        <kwd>most popular news</kwd>
        <kwd>gatekeeping</kwd>
        <kwd>news attention</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Introduction
The trend of online news use is changing fast. According to the Pew Internet and
American Life Project, people’s relationship to news is now becoming portable,
personalized, and participatory [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. In terms of being portable, 33% of cell phone
owners now access news on their cell phones. From the personalized perspective,
28% of Internet users have customized their home page to include news from
sources and on topics that particularly interest them. As to the concept of a
participatory Web: 37% of Internet users have contributed to the creation of news,
commented about it, or disseminated it via postings on social media sites like
Facebook or Twitter. More than 8 in 10 online news consumers get or share links in
e-mails. Therefore, online users consume news aiming not only to convenient news
use but also social participation.
      </p>
      <p>
        Nowadays, mainstream news media or portal news sites offer different most
popular news lists to users for news selection. However, we rarely see mainstream
news sites offer these different kinds of most popular news lists as applications to
social or mobile media (See Table 1). It seems that managers of a news site don’t
consider their most popular news cues as an ideal tool that can be applied to a social
and participatory Web. News use is becoming a shared social experience as people
swap links in e-mails, post news on their social networking site feeds, exchange
news stories in their Tweets, or discuss threads for hot topics or events as the Pew
Internet and American Life Project suggests. This paper theoretically discusses why
designing different kinds of most popular news lists as applications for social media
has important potential for online users’ various sharing purposes.
Exploring how different designs of news cues may affect online news consumption,
scholars have proved online news users use different news cues to select news.
Different designs of media salience cues [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3 ref4 ref5 ref6 ref7 ref8">2,3,4,5,6,7,8</xref>
        ] influence the roles of media
as gatekeepers and agenda-setters. Study also shows that different kinds of most
popular news, selected by people, contain different social meanings [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. Applying a
multi-gated model, the author explores meanings of various gated news by defining
citizens who have different patterns of news selection. This research provides a
theoretical argument to discuss the possibility that different kinds of most popular
news cues are potentially personal or social tools for users’ news attention[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Scholars commonly use technology, market, and democratic theories to explain
the process of news gatekeeping for new media. Bennett uses a multi-gated model
to demonstrate how the economy, journalism, technology, politics, and publics
shape news content[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. Bennett’s model offers four dimensions—reporter-driven,
organization-driven, market-driven, and technology-driven—to define who uses
news, what is news, and what roles news media play. In this study, the author
adjusts Bennett’s model and further develops four types of gated-news by
identifying the concepts of public, journalistic roles, gatekeeping norms, and online
users’ decision basis for news selection (See Fig. 1).
Defined by Most Viewed
Stories
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Marketgated News</title>
      <p>Citizens as
“consumers”</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Mediagated News</title>
      <p>Citizens as
“informed
citizens”</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Private</title>
      <p>citizen-gated</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>News</title>
      <p>Citizens as
“private
citizens”
Defined by
Media Top
Stories</p>
      <p>Issue</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Citizen-gated</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>News</title>
      <p>Citizens as
“issue publics”
Defined by
Most Recommended
or Most Blogged Stories</p>
      <p>Defined by Most E-mailed Stories
(Note: Two black arrows represent the competition of four kinds of gated news cues on
people’s news attention.)
!
In Bennett’s model, from a reporter/organization-driven dimension, the concept of
citizens is engaged citizens and social monitors who are concerned about public
interest. In addition, he describes the journalistic role of this dimension as a
watchdog and record keeper and news is defined by journalists, officials, and
established interests. People usually follow top news selected by editors are
regarded as informed citizens.</p>
      <p>From the market-driven dimension, the concept of citizens is entertainment
audiences that are concerned about consumer content. From this perspective,
Bennett considers the journalistic role as a content provider, and the decision basis
of news media is profits and the audience’s demographics. Because the norm of
news definition is “plausibility”—whether it makes a good story if plausible, its
information gathering process turns news into infotainment as the media focus on
market formulas. According to the market-driven dimension, most viewed stories
can be treated as market-gated news.</p>
      <p>From the technology-driven dimension, Bennett describes the journalistic role as
a transmitter, sending news content to the audience. The concept of citizens is
interactive citizens who interact with news content by sending information to others.
Two types of interactive citizens are further identified in this study—private citizens
(online users who e-mail stories to others) or active citizens (online users who
recommend stories or write blogs and add a story link to a blog). E-mailing news to
people they know, private citizens pay attention to information or issues related to
their private life or individual rights. In contrast, online users as active citizens pay
attention to public affairs and interact with others by recommending stories or
writing blogs. Therefore, private-citizen-gated (most e-mailed) news should be
related to individual issues or matters about private life; in contrast, news
characteristics of active-citizens who recommend news or blog news and put news
links to their blogs should pay attention to public affairs or public issues.
3</p>
      <p>
        News Characteristics and Multi-gated News Cues
The four kinds of online users in this model are defined as “informed citizens,”
“consumers,” “interactive private citizens” or “the interactive issue public.” Study
shows that these four kinds of gated news have distinctive news characteristics [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
Therefore, developing the ontology of this multi-gated model helps explain how
different kinds of most popular news attract citizens’ news attention. For those who
read media-gated news (media top stories), the public acts as “informed citizens”
and is more likely to follow hard news. The rationale is that the reporter and news
organizational dimensions reflect how news media fulfill their social responsibilities
by focusing on presenting news about what people need to know such as hard news
and issue stories. For those who read market-gated news (most viewed news), the
public acts as “consumers” and is more likely to choose soft news or sensational
news. If news media adopt a business model, media will offer them what people
want to know such as sensational news and soft news. From the technology-gated
dimension (most e-mailed/recommended news), news media create interactive
citizens that choose to interact or share news content with other and are more likely
to choose hard news, issue stories or soft news that is useful to individual citizens.
      </p>
      <p>
        According to Burnett’s model and the concepts of characteristics of four kinds of
gated news, characteristics become good factors in analyzing the content of most
popular news because news characteristics reflect online users’ uses and
gratifications. In addition, news cues of media-gated news, market-gated news, and
private-citizen-gated news are significant group factors in testing and explaining
online users’ news attention [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ] (See Table 2). From Figure 1 and Table 2, we can
infer possible interactions between various concepts of citizens based on news cues
and that suggests a semantic Web design, if reflecting objects’ relations among
specific actors and agents, might possibly push group or public dynamics.
4 Applying Gated News Cues as Attention-setting Factors for a Social
and Sharing Web
Based on the results discussed above, this paper theoretically draws two trends of
news consumption (See Figure 2): First, most popular news characteristics and news
cues imply different purposes for users’ news selection. Second, news editors can
apply different news cues to social media to broaden news use as social sharing tools
to serve the various concepts for citizens. A potential development of a social
semantic Web might answer the question—what are social consequences of
interactions invoked by the connection of various concepts of citizens together?
Related tests are still in progress by connecting online public forums and issues with
various kinds of citizens, defined by news cues that are set and presented by social
media.
5
      </p>
      <p>
        Discussion
1 News content and most popular news rankings were downloaded from news sites four times a
day for the two weeks of November 15 through November 28, 2006. The download times
were 8 a.m., 12 p.m., 6 p.m., and 10 p.m. that represent morning news, news at noon,
evening news and nightly news. This download plan is designed to reach online users with
various surfing schedules. There are 3,341 stories in total analyzed in this study. Please see
the methodology in detail in Exploring the Potential of Most Popular News Cues as a Web
3.0 Interactive Tool and Its Public Nature [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ].
It is important to discuss a social semantic Web from an interdisciplinary perspective
because semantics of Web influences how citizens see themselves as consumers, issue
publics, or private citizens. From a communicative perspective, program designers
become more important because they influence how citizens select news based on
news cues they design for Web sites. This paper suggests more scholarly cooperation
in the fields of computer science and social science to explore how a semantic Web,
designed as most popular news cues, has important implications for public and social
consequences.
      </p>
      <p>Mediagated News/
Media top
stories</p>
      <p>Supplying
media top
news feed to
social media
attracting
informed
citizens</p>
      <p>Issuepublicgated
News/Most
recommend
-ed news</p>
      <p>Supplying
most
blogged/
recommended news feed
to social
media</p>
      <p>Marketgated News/</p>
      <p>Most
Viewed
News</p>
      <p>Supplying
most viewed
news feed to
marketoriented
individual
sites</p>
      <p>Privatecitizen-gated
News/Most
e-mailed
news</p>
      <p>Supplying
most e-mailed
news feed to
social media
emphasizing
personal useful</p>
      <p>information
Live Feed</p>
      <sec id="sec-7-1">
        <title>Live Feed</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-2">
        <title>Live Feed</title>
        <p>Social consequences: Citizens are enhanced as consumers, private citizens
or issue public after following various kinds of most popular news cues.
What are social consequences of interactions invoked by the connection of
various concepts of citizens together?</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Purcell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rainie</surname>
            , L., Mitchell,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rosenstiel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Olmstead</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Understanding the participatory news consumers by the Pew Internet and American Life Project (</article-title>
          <year>2010</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sundar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nass</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Conceptualizing sources in online news</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Communication</source>
          ,
          <volume>51</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>52</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>72</lpage>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tewksbury</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of news readers on the Internet</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journalism of Communication</source>
          <volume>53</volume>
          :
          <fpage>452</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>65</lpage>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tewksbury</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Broadcasting &amp; Electronic Media</source>
          ,
          <volume>49</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>332</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>348</lpage>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Heeter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brown</surname>
          </string-name>
          , N.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soffin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stanley</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Salwen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Agenda-setting by electronic text news</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” Journalism Quarterly</source>
          <volume>66</volume>
          :
          <fpage>101</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>06</lpage>
          (
          <year>1989</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rice</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Frederick</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Theories old and new: The study of new media</article-title>
          . In R. Rice (Ed.) The News Media: Communication, Research, and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Technology</surname>
          </string-name>
          (pp.
          <fpage>55</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>80</lpage>
          ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage (
          <year>1984</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rioux</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Information Acquiring-and-sharing in Internet-based Environments: An Exploratory Study of Individual User Behaviors</article-title>
          .
          <source>Dissertation</source>
          , The University of Texas at Austin (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Curtin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dougall</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mersey</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R.D.:
          <article-title>The Internet and the future of journalism: Comparing news producers' and users' preferences on the Yahoo! News portal</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism</article-title>
          and Mass Communication, San Francisco, CA. (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Exploring Characteristics of Three Kinds of Gated News for Three Mainstream Online News Sites</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Paper presented at the annual conference of the association for Education in Journalism</article-title>
          and Mass Communication, Chicago,
          <year>August</year>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>News Cues and Most Popular News- Exploring How Online Users Pay Attention to Mainstream News Sites</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism</article-title>
          and Mass Communication, Chicago,
          <year>August</year>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bennett</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Gatekeeping and press-government relations: A multi-gated model of news construction</article-title>
          . In L. L.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kaid</surname>
          </string-name>
          (Ed.),
          <article-title>Handbook of political communication research</article-title>
          . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Exploring the Potential of Most Popular News Cues as a Web 3.0 Interactive Tool and Its Public Nature</article-title>
          .
          <source>Paper accepted at the conference of Convergence and Society: The Participatory Web Conference</source>
          , University of South Carolina, Columbia,
          <string-name>
            <surname>August</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>