<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xml:space="preserve" xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kermitt2/grobid/master/grobid-home/schemas/xsd/Grobid.xsd"
 xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<teiHeader xml:lang="en">
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt>
				<title level="a" type="main">Gross Product Simulation with pooling of Linear and Nonlinear Regression Models</title>
			</titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher/>
				<availability status="unknown"><licence/></availability>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<biblStruct>
					<analytic>
						<author>
							<persName><forename type="first">Ahmad</forename><surname>Flaih</surname></persName>
							<email>anflaih@ualr.edu</email>
							<affiliation key="aff0">
								<orgName type="institution">University of Arkansas at Little Rock</orgName>
								<address>
									<postCode>72204</postCode>
									<settlement>Little Rock</settlement>
									<region>AR</region>
									<country key="US">USA</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<author>
							<persName><forename type="first">Abbas</forename><surname>Abdalmuhsen</surname></persName>
							<email>akabdalmuh@ualr.edu</email>
							<affiliation key="aff0">
								<orgName type="institution">University of Arkansas at Little Rock</orgName>
								<address>
									<postCode>72204</postCode>
									<settlement>Little Rock</settlement>
									<region>AR</region>
									<country key="US">USA</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<author>
							<persName><forename type="first">Ebtisam</forename><surname>Abdulah</surname></persName>
							<email>ekabdulah@ualr.edu</email>
							<affiliation key="aff0">
								<orgName type="institution">University of Arkansas at Little Rock</orgName>
								<address>
									<postCode>72204</postCode>
									<settlement>Little Rock</settlement>
									<region>AR</region>
									<country key="US">USA</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<author>
							<persName><forename type="first">Srini</forename><surname>Ramaswamy</surname></persName>
							<email>sxramaswamy@ualr.edu</email>
							<affiliation key="aff0">
								<orgName type="institution">University of Arkansas at Little Rock</orgName>
								<address>
									<postCode>72204</postCode>
									<settlement>Little Rock</settlement>
									<region>AR</region>
									<country key="US">USA</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<title level="a" type="main">Gross Product Simulation with pooling of Linear and Nonlinear Regression Models</title>
					</analytic>
					<monogr>
						<imprint>
							<date/>
						</imprint>
					</monogr>
					<idno type="MD5">2A50A6BA77F9E84B7AEF2091CE4A3E48</idno>
				</biblStruct>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<encodingDesc>
			<appInfo>
				<application version="0.7.2" ident="GROBID" when="2023-03-24T17:58+0000">
					<desc>GROBID - A machine learning software for extracting information from scholarly documents</desc>
					<ref target="https://github.com/kermitt2/grobid"/>
				</application>
			</appInfo>
		</encodingDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<textClass>
				<keywords>
					<term>Regression Models</term>
					<term>Linear combination</term>
					<term>Cobb-Douglas production function</term>
					<term>Predict of the gross product</term>
				</keywords>
			</textClass>
			<abstract>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><p>This paper discusses the problem of decision support systems in the organization. The procedure (linear combination) developed with the aim to combine some predicted results obtained with simulation of linear and nonlinear regression models (experts), multiple regression model, nonparametric regression model, and semi parametric regression model. This adjustment procedure enforce some statistical characteristics like the expected value of the gross production rate based on Cobb-Douglas production function is unbiased for the actual value, and the total weights(importance) of all models(experts) is equal to one. We used modeling and simulation techniques to generate our data and to apply the procedure.</p></div>
			</abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text xml:lang="en">
		<body>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1">Introduction</head><p>In economics, the relationship between the production (outputs) and the production elements (inputs) known as production function. Usually decision makers in the organization and companies used some statistical and economics methods to support the production policy. Cobb-Douglas (CD) production function is one of the most useful tools to support the production policy, <ref type="bibr" target="#b0">[1]</ref> and <ref type="bibr" target="#b8">[9]</ref> used the CD function and found that public investment has a large contribution to production, <ref type="bibr" target="#b6">[7]</ref> argued that public-sector capital has no effect on production after controlling for location characteristic, <ref type="bibr" target="#b1">[2]</ref> and <ref type="bibr" target="#b4">[5]</ref> pursued the insignificance of public capital. All of the literature above assumes a Cobb-Douglas (CD) production function to estimate productivity of inputs. One property of the CD functional form is that elasticity of an input is the estimated slope coefficient when the output and inputs are measured in logs, <ref type="bibr" target="#b5">[6]</ref> used nonparametric perspective, which allows elasticities to vary across location and time, <ref type="bibr" target="#b14">[15]</ref> use the CD functions proposed by <ref type="bibr" target="#b8">[9]</ref>. <ref type="bibr" target="#b1">[2]</ref> and <ref type="bibr" target="#b5">[6]</ref> considers the gross product(GP) as responding variable, public capital (PUC), private capital (PRC), the employment rate (EMP), and the unemployment rate (UEPR) as explanatory variables, to predict of the gross product by using linear and nonlinear regression models. <ref type="bibr" target="#b12">[13]</ref> they have propsed linear pooling method to combine the probability forecasts and proved the propsed method gave them more accurate results.</p><p>In this paper we used the same variables and methodology to predict gross production, but we use linear combination method to combine the results of the three experts (multiple linear regression, non-linear regression, and semi-parametric) as input variables, we choose these three types of models because we think there is linear relationship, non-linear relationship and mixture relationship between gross production and the predictor variables. It is based on our hypothesis that the linear combination method will give us more accurate predictive gross production since we believe this is a better way to take into account the results of multiple models accompanied by an appropriate weighting scheme. Furthermore, we prove that this method gives an unbiased estimator to the gross production. Our contribution is that we use linear combination method to pool three regression models for predicting the gross production. Linear combination is linear pooling of some sets of ordered pairs (importance, gross production), we have explored the prediction associated with different regression model can be combined into one final model via weighted linear combination will give more accurate results. Mathematically linear combination of the sequence 1 2</p><p>, ,..., n y y y each with mean  is:</p><formula xml:id="formula_0">1 n i i i Y a y   </formula><p>, where i a is the weight of i y ,and</p><formula xml:id="formula_1">1 2 1 ( ) ( ) ... n i i n i Y a y a a a             The ( ) Y    if 1 1 n i i a    2 The Models</formula><p>Regression analysis is a technique used in data analysis; we use regression technique to predict the value of the response (dependent) variable given any value of the predictor (independent) variable. A general regression model is <ref type="bibr" target="#b14">[15]</ref>: <ref type="bibr">(</ref> )</p><formula xml:id="formula_2">i i i i y E y x e  </formula><p>Where i=1, 2... n denoting an observation of a subject. y i is the response variable and</p><p>x i is a k 1  vector of independent variables. E (y i │x i ) is the expectation of y i conditional on x i , and e i is the error term. In this paper we will use the following types of regression model:</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.1">Parametric Regression Model:</head><p>In this model, it is assumed that y i is linearly related with x i , so we can say it is linear regression model:</p><p>( )</p><formula xml:id="formula_3">i i i E y x x     </formula><p>Thus a linear regression model is written as:</p><formula xml:id="formula_4">i i i y x e      </formula><p>Where α is the intercept and  is k 1  vector of parameters. Under Gauss-Markov assumptions, the estimators of α and  are Best Linear Unbiased Estimators (BLUE), and can be estimate by using Ordinary Least Squares method (OLS).</p><formula xml:id="formula_5">(1)<label>(2)</label></formula><p>(3)</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.2">Nonparametric Regression Model</head><p>If we do not know the data generating process, it is very unlikely that a linear regression (parametric) model is exactly the appropriate model specification, so the estimators α and  are not BLUE (best linear unbiased estimator). Instead of making assumptions for the functional form of E (y i │x i ), nonparametric regression methods do not require any presumptions about the underlying data generating process <ref type="bibr" target="#b9">[10]</ref>. Let ( )</p><formula xml:id="formula_6">i i i y m x e  </formula><p>Where m (.) is some function of unspecified functional form. Some basic assumptions about m (.) are commonly made. Many methods have been devised to estimate the regression function m (.), but we will just consider a simple but effective estimate known as the Kernel regression estimate. Suppose we have a random sample (x 1 , y 1 ), (x 2 , y 2 ) …, (x n ,y n ). The Kernel regression estimate of m(x) =E (y│X=x) is given by:</p><formula xml:id="formula_7">m ˆ(x) = 1 1 ( ) ( ) n i j i i n i j i x x k y d x x k d      </formula><p>Here, K is a nonnegative symmetric function that is not increasing as its argument gets away from zero, and d is a parameter called the smoothing parameter that is selected by the user to control the amount of smoothing. The estimator in equation ( <ref type="formula">4</ref>) is called the Local-Constant Least-Squares, which can be interpreted as a weighted average of y i , where: </p><formula xml:id="formula_8"> 1 ( ) ( ) k i j is js s S x x x x k d d     </formula><p>Where x js is the s th component of x j and d s the s th component of d. The Kernel function k (.) can take several forms. In this paper we used the Gaussian Kernel function is defined as:</p><formula xml:id="formula_9">2 1 1 ( ) exp[ ( ) ] 2 2 is js is js S S x x x x k d d     </formula><p>The smoothing parameter d is generally the most important factor when performing nonparametric regression. The bandwidth is chosen to obtain a desirable (4) (5) (6) <ref type="bibr" target="#b6">(7)</ref> trade-off between the bias and the variance of estimation, so we need a method that could balance the bias and variance of the resulting estimate.</p><p>We have used Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation to select the optimal bandwidth. This method is depending on the principle of selecting bandwidth that minimizes the sum squared error of the resulting estimates. We will try to find the minimum MSE, mathematically; we are trying to minimize the following function <ref type="bibr" target="#b14">[15]</ref>:</p><formula xml:id="formula_10">CV (d) = 2 1 1 [ ( )] n i j j i y m x n   </formula><p>Where ˆ( )</p><formula xml:id="formula_11">j j</formula><p>m x is the Leave-One-Out estimator of m (.) evaluated at x j . SAS software uses this method to find the optimal bandwidth values.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.3">Semi parametric regression model:</head><p>Nonparametric techniques are very flexible because they do not need any assumptions about functional form. However, there are cases in which the relationship between the dependent variable and some independent variables is known to be linear and the relation between the dependent variable and other independent variables remain undetermined. In this situation semi parametric models are developed to solve this problem. Semi parametric models have both parametric and nonparametric components <ref type="bibr" target="#b14">[15]</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.3.1">Semi parametric Partially Linear Model</head><p>Consider the semi parametric partially linear model: ( )</p><formula xml:id="formula_12">i i i i y x m z e     </formula><p>Where  is a k 1  vector of parameters, z i is a 1  q vector of independent variables and e i is an additive error, is assumed to be uncorrelated with xi and z i .  is the parametric part of the model and the unknown function m (.) is the nonparametric part. <ref type="bibr" target="#b7">[8]</ref>  <ref type="bibr" target="#b10">[11]</ref> proposed an estimate of  and m (z i ) as follows. Using ordinary least squares, the estimator of  is: </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>ˆ( )</head><formula xml:id="formula_13">n n i i i i i i x x x y              Where: i x   x i -E (x i │ z i ) and i y =y i -E (y i │ z i )</formula><p>Once we obtain  ˆ, the nonparametric part m (z i ) is easy to estimate. From equation ( <ref type="formula">8</ref>), we get: m</p><formula xml:id="formula_14">(z i ) = i i i y x e    </formula><p>Then we can get the estimator of m (z i ) as follow:</p><formula xml:id="formula_15">1 1 ( ) ( ) ˆ( ) ( ) n i j i i i i n i j i z z y x k d m z z z k d           (8)<label>(9) (10)</label></formula><p>Where d can be estimate similar to the nonparametric model? SAS software uses Cross-Validation to find the optimal bandwidth.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.">Simulation Study</head><p>We will generate a random sample of size 30 observations for each explanatory variables: public capital (PUC), private capital (PRC), the employment rate (EMP), and the unemployment rate (UERP). The Cobb-Douglas (CD) production function is, ( , , , )</p><formula xml:id="formula_17">i i i i i y f PUC PRC EMP UERP  Where i y =gross product, i PUC =public capital, i PRC =private capital, i EMP =employment rate (labor) i UERP =unemployment rate.</formula><p>We can rewrite the CD function as,</p><formula xml:id="formula_18">3 1 2 4 0 ( ) B B B B i i i i I i y PUC PRC EMP UERP    </formula><p>The log-linear CD production function is        &gt;1, returns to scale are increasing.</p><formula xml:id="formula_19">0 1 2 3 4 i i i i i i y PUC PRC EMP UERP             Further, 1-If 1 2 3 4        =1,</formula></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.1.1">Parametric model Results</head><p>We apply multi-linear regression model, covariance model, and variance component model to our generated data to find the estimated values by using SAS procedure proc reg <ref type="bibr" target="#b11">[12]</ref> and the output are listed in Tables 1, follow: The results of Table <ref type="table" target="#tab_0">1</ref> are based on the model in <ref type="bibr" target="#b11">[12]</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.1.2">Non Parametric Model</head><p>We used this model to find the estimated values of the intercept and elasticity values by using generated data and SAS procedure (proc gam). The output from proc gam is listed in following table, Table <ref type="table" target="#tab_1">2</ref> </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.1.3">Semi-Parametric Model</head><p>We used this model to find the estimates values of Elasticity by using SAS procedure (proc gam) and we considered the independent variable (Public Capital) is linearly related to the gross production. The output from proc gam is listed as follows in Table <ref type="table" target="#tab_2">3</ref>. </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.2">Linear Combination Method</head><p>We will use the estimated models (experts), multiple parametric regression, nonparametric regression, and Semiparametric regression to predict o f the log-gross production, for sample of size equal to 10 observations, and by using the values of the columns(Parametric 1 From Table <ref type="table">5</ref> we can find that the correlation coefficient between the predicted values of the linear combination(Y) and the actual variable of gross production is (0.954) that means the linear combination method is more associated with the actual values than the expert1, expert2, and expert3.this strongest association supports the suggestion that the predicted value of the gross production which associated with the different experts that combined is better than taking the predictive values of each expert individually. The average difference is (0.261, 0.959, 0.146, 0.103) of the three regression models (parametric, non-parametric, and semi-parametric) respectively and linear combination procedure. The proposed method (linear combination) is more accurate than regression models because the difference (actual and Y) in table 4 is more less than the other models, so this means that the proposed method give us unbiased estimator.</p><p>Table <ref type="table">5</ref>: Correlation Matrix</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.">Conclusion</head><p>In this paper, table 5(correlation matrix) shown that the correlation coefficients between the linear combination method, parametric model, nonparametric model and semi-parametric and the actual values of the gross production are (0.954, 0.457, 0.935, and -0.015), because we believe the public capital (PUC) is linearly related to gross production, so we choose it as parametric variable and that is why the </p></div><figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="fig_0"><head></head><label></label><figDesc>attached to y i It should be noted that the product Kernel function  ( ) of the Kernel function of all components of x. That is:</figDesc></figure>
<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="fig_2"><head></head><label></label><figDesc>the product function has constant returns to scale.</figDesc></figure>
<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="table" xml:id="tab_0"><head>Table 1 :</head><label>1</label><figDesc>Estimates of output Elasticity: parametric approaches</figDesc><table><row><cell>Parametric</cell><cell></cell><cell>0</cell><cell>1 </cell><cell></cell><cell>2</cell><cell></cell><cell>3</cell><cell></cell><cell>4</cell></row><row><cell>OLS</cell><cell cols="2">15.089</cell><cell>-0.0157</cell><cell cols="2">0.29952</cell><cell cols="2">-1.709</cell><cell cols="2">-0.6721</cell></row><row><cell>S.E</cell><cell cols="2">(5.4239)</cell><cell>(0.3465)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.218)</cell><cell cols="2">(1.107)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.2114)</cell></row><row><cell>covariance</cell><cell cols="2">1.87</cell><cell>0.342</cell><cell cols="2">0.005</cell><cell cols="2">-.0127</cell><cell cols="2">-.004</cell></row><row><cell>model</cell><cell cols="2">(4.23)</cell><cell>(0.034)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.1933)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.039)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.001)</cell></row><row><cell>variance</cell><cell cols="2">0.018</cell><cell>0.266</cell><cell cols="2">0.755</cell><cell cols="2">0.347</cell><cell cols="2">-0.005</cell></row><row><cell>component</cell><cell cols="2">(0.023)</cell><cell>(0.020)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.023)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.052)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.001)</cell></row><row><cell>model</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell></row></table></figure>
<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="table" xml:id="tab_1"><head>Table 2 :</head><label>2</label><figDesc>: Estimates of output Elasticity: Nonparametric approach</figDesc><table><row><cell>Nonparametric</cell><cell></cell><cell>0</cell><cell>1 </cell><cell></cell><cell>2</cell><cell></cell><cell>3</cell><cell></cell><cell>4</cell></row><row><cell>Mean</cell><cell cols="2">14.834</cell><cell>-0.211</cell><cell cols="2">0.2409</cell><cell cols="2">-1.242</cell><cell cols="2">-0.653</cell></row><row><cell>S.E</cell><cell cols="2">(6.342)</cell><cell>(0.37)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.391)</cell><cell cols="2">(1.401)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.27)</cell></row></table></figure>
<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="table" xml:id="tab_2"><head>Table 3 :</head><label>3</label><figDesc>Estimates of output Elasticity: semiparametric approach</figDesc><table><row><cell>Semiparametric</cell><cell></cell><cell>0</cell><cell>1 </cell><cell></cell><cell>2</cell><cell></cell><cell>3</cell><cell></cell><cell>4</cell></row><row><cell>Mean</cell><cell cols="2">19.892</cell><cell>-0.459</cell><cell cols="2">0.288</cell><cell cols="2">-2.010</cell><cell cols="2">-0.642</cell></row><row><cell>S.E</cell><cell cols="2">(7.369)</cell><cell>(0.470)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.296)</cell><cell cols="2">(1.50)</cell><cell cols="2">(0.28)</cell></row></table></figure>
<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="table" xml:id="tab_3"><head>Table 4 :</head><label>4</label><figDesc>Correlation is a measure of the association between two variables; it is a very important part of statistics. One of the most fundamental concepts in many applications is the concept of correlation. If two variables are correlated, this means that you can use information about one variable to predict the values of the other variable. The correlation matrixes between the predicted values in the table 4 as follows: Correlation between Predicted Values i</figDesc><table><row><cell cols="13">y ,Nonparametric 2 y ,Semiparametric 3 y ) in the following</cell></row><row><cell cols="13">table, we can estimates the weight corresponding to each expert(model) with SPSS</cell></row><row><cell cols="13">software by using neural networks procedure and estimate the log-gross production Y</cell></row><row><cell>as follow:</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>Y</cell><cell></cell><cell>0.194</cell><cell>y</cell><cell>1</cell><cell></cell><cell>0.595</cell><cell>y</cell><cell>2</cell><cell></cell><cell>0.255</cell><cell>y</cell><cell>3</cell></row></table></figure>
		</body>
		<back>
			<div type="annex">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><p>correlation between y 3 and actual value is -0.015. Linear combination method is more associated with the actual value than the others experts (regression model), i.e. linear combination method reflects the experts views to find the most fitted predicted value to the actual value. Finally as forecasters often wish to provide an accurate predicted value, so we will use the linear combination method to predict of the gross production.</p></div>			</div>
			<div type="references">

				<listBibl>

<biblStruct xml:id="b0">
	<monogr>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">Aschauer</forename><surname>David</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">A</forename></persName>
		</author>
		<title level="m">public investment and productivity growth in the Group of Seven</title>
				<imprint>
			<publisher>Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago</publisher>
			<date type="published" when="1989">1989</date>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="89" to="102" />
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b1">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Public capital stock and state productivity growth:Further evidence from and error component model</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">B</forename><surname>Baltagi</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">N</forename><surname>Pinnoi</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Empirical Economics</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">20</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="351" to="359" />
			<date type="published" when="1995">1995</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b2">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Combining Probability Distributions from Experts in Risk Analysis</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">R</forename><forename type="middle">T</forename><surname>Clemen</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">R</forename><forename type="middle">L</forename><surname>Winkler</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Risk Analysis</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">19</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="187" to="203" />
			<date type="published" when="1999">1999</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b3">
	<monogr>
		<title level="m" type="main">Fitting Generalized Additive Models with the GAM Procedure</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">Dong</forename><surname>Xiang</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="1990">1990</date>
			<publisher>SAS Institute Inc</publisher>
			<biblScope unit="page">27513</biblScope>
			<pubPlace>Cary, NC</pubPlace>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b4">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Porter: The effect of public capital in state-level production function reconsidered</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">Teresa</forename><surname>Garcia-Mila</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">Therese</forename><forename type="middle">J</forename><surname>Mcguire</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">Robert</forename><forename type="middle">H</forename></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Review Economics and Statistics forthcoming</title>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="1996">1996</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b5">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Public and private capital productivity puzzle:A nonparametric approach</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">D</forename><forename type="middle">J</forename><surname>Henderson</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">S</forename><surname>Kumbhakar</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">southern Economic Journal</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">73</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="219" to="232" />
			<date type="published" when="2006">2006</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b6">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Public-sector capital and the productivity puzzle</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">D</forename><surname>Holtz-Eakin</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Review of Economics and statistics</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">76</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="12" to="21" />
			<date type="published" when="1994">1994</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b7">
	<monogr>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">Q</forename><surname>Li</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><forename type="middle">S</forename><surname>Racine</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<title level="m">Nonparametric econometrics: theory and practice</title>
				<imprint>
			<publisher>Princeton University Press</publisher>
			<date type="published" when="2007">2007</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b8">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">How does public infrastructure affect regional economic performance?</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">A</forename><surname>Munnell</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">New England Economic Review</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="11" to="32" />
			<date type="published" when="1990-09">September. 1990</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b9">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Incorporating Judgment in Far Chart</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">Par</forename><surname>Osterholm</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Finance and Economics Discussion Series. Screen Reader Version</title>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2006">2006</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b10">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Root-n-consistent semiparametric regression</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">P</forename><forename type="middle">M</forename><surname>Robinson</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Econometrica</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">56</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="931" to="954" />
			<date type="published" when="1988">1988</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b11">
	<monogr>
		<title level="m" type="main">Applied Statistics and the SAS Programming Language</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">Ronald</forename><forename type="middle">P</forename><surname>Cody</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">Jeffrey</forename><forename type="middle">K</forename><surname>Smith</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2006">2006</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
	<note>5 th .ed</note>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b12">
	<monogr>
		<title level="m" type="main">Combining Probability Factors</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">R</forename><surname>Roopesh</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">G</forename><surname>Tilmann</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2008">2008</date>
			<biblScope unit="volume">543</biblScope>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
	<note type="report_type">Technical Report</note>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b13">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">On asymptotically efficient estimation in semiparametric models</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">A</forename><surname>Schick</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Annals of Statistics</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="1139" to="1151" />
			<date type="published" when="1986">1986</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b14">
	<monogr>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">S</forename><surname>Xianghang</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<title level="m">Application of Nonparametric and Semi-parametric methods in Economics and Finance</title>
				<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2009">2009</date>
		</imprint>
		<respStmt>
			<orgName>University of Southern California</orgName>
		</respStmt>
	</monogr>
	<note type="report_type">PhD dissertation</note>
</biblStruct>

				</listBibl>
			</div>
		</back>
	</text>
</TEI>
