<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Ontology Engineering for Linked Data: What Makes for a Good Ontology?</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Martin Hepp</string-name>
          <email>mhepp@computer.org</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Universit ̈at der Bundeswehr</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Munich</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The talk will discuss the impact of ontology design choices and ontology quality criteria on the overall impact of the linked data initiatives. In particular, it will analyze whether there are good and bad ontologies from a practical standpoint, what quality criteria will matter the most, and how this relates to the ”raw data now” movement in the community.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body />
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>