<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Absorptive Capacity In Service Innovation: the Role of IT Capabilities</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>CeRSI-LUISS Guido Carli lsabini</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>pspagnoletti@luiss.it</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>33</fpage>
      <lpage>36</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This working paper sets up the basis for investigating the role of IT capabilities in the context of large and distributed service organizations. The idea grounded in this article resides in the possibility that absorptive capacity has an impact on service innovation. Addressing some theories on absorptive capacity and on service innovation we provide a brief insight on the importance that IT skills and capabilities can have on service innovation in large organization which are widespread distributed in different geographical location.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The growing intensity and dynamism of competition across product markets has had
profound implications for the evolution of strategic management. Increasing
turbulence of the external business environment has focused attention upon the
importance of learning fast how to behave within the markets and react to reach good
performances
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">(Grant, 1996)</xref>
        . Knowledge and the processes through which knowledge
is obtained and understood have emerged as the most strategically-significant
resources of the firm.
      </p>
      <p>
        In order to clarify the relationship between knowledge and firm
performance/innovation, the concept of absorptive capacity has been introduced by
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Cohen and Levinthal (1990)</xref>
        . Despite this construct has been developed focusing on
product innovation in the manufacturing industry, some of its assumptions seems to
apply also to service and open innovation domains. In fact, it allows explaining
organizational phenomena such as the need to evaluate and incorporate externally
generated technical knowledge into the firm which are even more relevant in the
emerging open networked environments.
      </p>
      <p>
        Open innovation refers to the environments in which multiple actors (both public
and private) collaborate in delivering innovative services, each contributing with its
own resources and capabilities, and where the underlying business models are
attractive to all of the participants involved
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">(Chesbrough 2003)</xref>
        . In such collaborative
environments, value is created via service innovation and by mediating between
customer’s needs, organizational resources and capabilities, financial arrangements,
and technological possibilities
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Bouman and Fielt 2008, Chesbrough and Rosenbloom
2002)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        In this context, information technology (IT) has been widely recognized as one of
the firm capabilities which have a potential impact on the development of new
products, services and the associated business processes
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref9">(Swanson 1994, Swanson
and Ramiller 2004)</xref>
        . Nevertheless, the process by which IT based innovation is
undertaken in cooperative service environments still needs further investigation.
      </p>
      <p>In this working paper we address this topic by providing the theoretical basis for a
further analysis of innovation processes in cooperative service environments. It lies
on the constructs of absorptive capacity. In particular, the following research
questions have been addressed: 1) to which extent absorptive capacity constructs
apply to the service and open innovation contexts? 2) how do they relate to IT
capabilities?</p>
      <p>The paper is organized as follows. A theoretical background section will introduce
the underpinning theories and concepts applied to a traditional organization. Then, a
discussion session will briefly present the proposed framework.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Theoretical Background</title>
      <p>
        The capability to learn is very important for an organization. The process through
which it is achieved has been widely investigated in the management literature. This
process has been divided into four main steps
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">(Huber, 1991)</xref>
        : knowledge acquisition
(process by which knowledge is obtained), information distribution (process by which
information from different sources is shared and thereby leads to new information
understanding), information interpretation (process by which distributed information
is given one or more common understood interpretations), organizational memory
(means by which knowledge is stored for future use). All these elements concur to the
building of organizational learning.
      </p>
      <p>
        Information interpretation has been defined as “the process of translating events
and developing shared understandings and conceptual schemes”
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Daft &amp; Weick,
1984)</xref>
        . A particular aspects that
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Huber (1991)</xref>
        underlines is information overload.
Interpretation within or across organizational units is less effective if the information
to be interpreted exceeds the units' capacity to process the information adequately.
      </p>
      <p>These concepts move to the idea that, due to the amount and the scale of
information, there is no organizational learning when organizations tackle too many
information.</p>
      <p>
        The research of Levitt and March on the problem of interpretation of past
experiences states that it is a process based on a small number of observations in a
complex, changing organization. The events that happen are not always obvious, and
the causality of events is difficult to untangle, the difference between success and
failure of a given action is not always clear
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Levitt &amp; March, 1988)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>The main problem with the learning theories described above is linked with the
limit faced by an organization for allowing knowledge to flow inside the organization
itself. Absorptive capacity is a limit to the rate of information that a firm can absorb.</p>
      <p>
        Absorptive Capacity In Service Innovation: the Role of IT Capabilities
The seminal article on absorptive capacity highlights the idea that the capacity of an
organization to absorb external knowledge (recognize, evaluate, assimilate and apply)
is a function of the level of prior related knowledge
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Cohen and Levinthal, 1990)</xref>
        .
This assumption is very important because it stresses the importance to get ground
knowledge of a particular subject in order to have the possibility of increasing
organizational innovation by exploiting external one. For organizations this
implication means that investing in “related” knowledge can be fruitful for their
possibility to increase organizational innovation.
      </p>
      <p>
        Other researches point out the different perspective that absorptive capacity (AC)
has on potential and realized absorptive capacity. They highlight that while the ability
to value and acquire external knowledge is a potential AC, the organization cannot
gain positive outcome if this potential AC is not supported by realized AC which is a
function of leveraging absorbed knowledge
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">(Zahra and George, 2002)</xref>
        . Therefore, the
development of both these elements of AC is crucial for an organization.
      </p>
      <p>
        The use of these concepts has been useful for understanding the possibility to
move the absorptive capacity from the R&amp;D department
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Cohen and Levinthal, 1990)</xref>
        ,
to more decentralized units such as local managers of subsidiaries. These people can
easily catch ideas from external environment and formalize them in a way to suggest
the production of new products and services to the organization. This process is
subject to both the ability of organization and the ability of local managers. The
former consists in providing managers with tools for accurately interpret their
environment. The second ability lies in the capability of scanning the environment
and identifying which type of new service/product can be implemented by
organization.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>
        Previous research on the sources of innovation has demonstrated that organizational
innovation results from borrowing rather than invention. Indeed, the ability to exploit
external knowledge is a critical component of innovative capabilities. Furthermore,
information originating from other internal units in the firm, outside the formal
innovating unit (i.e., the R&amp;D lab), such as marketing and manufacturing, has also
received attention in the product industry
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Cohen and Levinthal, 1990)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>In large service organizations (i.e. banks) which are widespread distributed within
different geographical environments and where subsidiaries encounter different
customer needs and a variety of possible partners, the role of local managers and of
integration mechanisms become crucial. In fact, on the one hand local managers
represent the gatekeepers which can support organizations in the definition of
competitive strategies and in the development of new services. They have the
possibility to acquire, assimilate, transform and exploit knowledge in order to achieve
organizational innovation. Thus, local managers should possess a set of skills
allowing them to recognize the potential value of a business idea and to communicate
it to other organizational units. On the other hand, integration mechanisms (i.e.
specialized actors, supporting tools) are needed in order to enable the transfer of
knowledge from local managers to the organizational units in charge of implementing
new services.</p>
      <p>Therefore, the effectiveness of the overall innovation process lies on both the
quality of the interpretation that managers perform on the environmental needs and
opportunities (potential absorptive capacity) and the effectiveness of the integration
mechanisms which exploit the service innovation (realized absorptive capacity).</p>
      <p>When services are heavily supported by IT, interoperability represents a
prerequisite of open innovation environments and the above mentioned “prior related
knowledge” must necessarily refer also to IT skills and capabilities.</p>
      <p>As a result of this conceptual analysis on the applicability of absorptive capacity
concepts to a cooperative service environment, the following research questions arise:
1) which type of IT skills and capabilities (prior related knowledge) positively affect
the potential absorptive capacity of local managers? 2) which integration mechanisms
can be implemented at organizational/inter-organizational level in order to positively
affect the realized absorptive capacity and to increase the efficiency of assimilation
and transformation?</p>
      <p>These research questions should be further empirically investigated in order to gain
insights on the role of IT skills and capabilities in the organizational innovation
processes.
4</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chesbrough</surname>
            <given-names>HW</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
          <article-title>Open Innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology</article-title>
          .
          <source>Harvard Business</source>
          School Press
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chesbrough</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rosenbloom RS</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
          <article-title>The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox</article-title>
          .
          <source>Industrial and Corporate Change</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>529</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>555</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cohen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Levinthal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1990</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Absorptive Capacity : A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Administrative Science Quarterly</source>
          ,
          <volume>35</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>128</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>152</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Daft</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weick</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1984</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems</article-title>
          .
          <source>Academy of management review.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grant</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1996</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration</article-title>
          .
          <source>Organization Science</source>
          ,
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>375</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>387</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1991</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures</article-title>
          .
          <source>Organization Science</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>88</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>115</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lane</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Koka</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pathak</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2006</year>
          .
          <article-title>"The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct,"</article-title>
          <source>Academy of Management Review (31:4)</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>833</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>863</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Levitt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>March</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1988</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Organizational Learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>Annual Reviews</source>
          ,
          <volume>14</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>319</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>340</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Swanson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1994</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Information systems innovation among organizations</article-title>
          .
          <source>Management Science</source>
          ,
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Swanson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ramiller</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Innovating mindfully with information technology</article-title>
          .
          <source>MIS Quarterly</source>
          ,
          <volume>28</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>553</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>583</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zahra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>George</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension</article-title>
          .
          <source>Academy of Management Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>27</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>185</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>203</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>