<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Finding structure in dynamic networks (and what it means for zebras)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Tanya Berger-Wolf</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Illinois</institution>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p />
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Social creatures interact in diverse ways: forming groups, mating, sending emails,
and sharing ideas. Some of the interactions are accidental while others are a
consequence of the underlying explicit or implicit social structures. One of the
most important questions in sociology is the identi cation of such structures,
which are variously viewed as communities, hierarchies, or \social pro les".</p>
      <p>In analyzing social networks, one property has largely been ignored until
recently: interactions and their nature change over time. The notion of \structure"
is intricately linked with the dynamics of social interactions. On one hand, it is in
longitudinal data that the emergence of structures and the laws governing their
development can be observed and inferred. On the other hand, the existence of
such structures that constrain social interactions is what allows us to predict the
behavior and nature of dynamic networks. The necessity to delve into the
dynamic aspects of networking behavior may be clear, yet it would not be feasible
without the data to support such explicitly dynamic analysis. Rapidly
growing electronic networks, such as emails, the Web, blogs, and friendship sites, as
well as mobile sensor networks on cars, humans, and animals, provide an
abundance of dynamic social network data that for the rst time allow the temporal
component to be explicitly addressed in network analysis.</p>
      <p>I will present several examples of computational approaches we have
developed to infer structure in dynamic networks and show applications of this
analysis to population biology, from humans to zebras.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>