<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>WORKSHOP ON CROSS-LINGUAL AND CROSS-CULTURAL ISSUES OF THE SEMANTIC WEB (C3LSW-2010)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Chair: Yuri A. Tijerino, Associate Professor Department of Applied Informatics, School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University 2-1 Gakuen</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Sanda, Japan 669-1337</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Co-chair: Tarek Helmy, Associate Professor College of Computer Science and Engineering, Department of Information and Computer Science, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Dhahran 31261</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="SA">Saudi Arabia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>1. Motivation Ontologies, are the conceptual framework of choice for the Semantic Web. In theory, ontologies whould allow cross-lingual querying and presentation of query results across multiple languages, provided that appropriate lexical mappings of the source and target languages have been implemented. In reality, lexical mappings are just one part of the equation, as other non-lexical issues, more specifically; cultural-dependency issues also play an important role. Addressing these issues, has become a particularly urgent necessity for the realization of the Semantic Web as over 76% of the estimated 1.8 billion total number of Web users, speak a language other than English, so far the lingua-franca of the Web. We desperately need novel approaches to address the theoretical and practical issues related not only to lexical-to-conceptual mappings of natural language to ontologies, but also to a variety of non-linguistic issues. Just as internationalization (i18n) and localization (L10n) do not simply consist of translation of interface components, but also of careful cross-cultural and cross-functional consideration to the cultural sensitivities of the intended source and target languages, similar considerations should be given to those issues in the realization of the multilingual Semantic Web. This workshop is intended to gather researchers who are performing innovative research that directly or indirectly address these Issues.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>2. WORKSHOP DESCRIPTION</title>
      <p>This workshop is intended to provide a forum to share and discuss innovative ideas
approaches in ontology, agent and Semantic Web research in areas related to the cross-lingual
and cross-cultural issues of the multilingual Semantic Web. The issues discussed will not only
be relevant and timely to ISWC2010 participants, but also of much urgency, because the
exponential growth non-English-speaking users of the Web and thus the Semantic Web. This
urgency becomes apparent as most known written languages become part of the Web and as
the rapid penetration rate of the Web users to over 25% of the World population, most of
which speak a language other than English, so far the lingua franca of the Web, requires that
we pay close attention to the potential issues that might arise from a multilingual and
multicultural Semantic Web. In particular, this is true for languages spoken in Asia as it is
interesting to note that just for a period of 9 years, from end of the year 2000 to the end of the
year 2009, Asia enjoyed a 568.8% increase in Internet usage penetration and currently holds
over 42% of the total world Internet users, this with a penetration rate of just over 20% of the
total Asian population, which leaves it much room to grow compared to the rest of the World.
This is interesting, because we have barely scratched the surface of the Semantic Web with
languages such as Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Russian and Arabic, which together account
for about 646.8 million users or about 35.8% of the total 1.8 billion current users[1]. As the
penetration rate for these languages increases, new approaches to enable the realization of
the multilingual Semantic Web become even more important.</p>
      <p>INTENDED WORKSHOP AUDIENCE
One of the important topics of the workshop, is how to map language-dependent lexica to
language-independent ontologies, to enable cross-lingual and cross-cultural querying and
presentation of query results across multiple and diverse languages. The increasing use of
nonnative languages on the Web can be insightfully compared with the development of
interlanguages by second language learners. Moreover, the successful implementation of the
multilingual Semantic Web across multiple languages and cultures requires novel approaches
to address the theoretical and practical issues related, not only to the mappings of natural
language lexica to conceptual ontologies, but also to a variety of other factors peculiar to
cultures and their spoken languages. Consider for example, that internationalization (i18n)
and localization (L10n) do not simply consist of the relexification of interface components
(e.g., phrase-for-phrase translation), but also of careful cross-cultural considerations of the
sensitivities of the intended speakers of the source as well as the target languages. Conversely,
although ontologies are fundamentally language-independent, when ontologies are used as an
interlanguage framework to translate lexical information from one language to another, this
usage is subject to the cross-cultural influences which have been historically identified by
i18n and L10n efforts. Thus, just as in the case of traditional i18n and L10n approaches, we
must address these issues, not only from the theoretical point of view, but also from the
engineering, methodology and work-flow points of view.</p>
      <p>Moreover, these issues transcend linguistic and cultural aspects as they affect functional
implementation of software components, specifically software agents, which must inevitably
cross language and cultural boundaries when querying and performing reasoning across
ontologies developed under the many linguistic and cultural biases possible in a multilingual
Semantic Web. Some questions that come to mind are: Do we need to adapt agent designs, to
accommodate for the multi-linguistic and/or multi-cultural boundaries, which agents must
inevitable cross to gather knowledge on which to perform reasoning? If so, do we also need to
adapt agent communication and negotiation policies for agents collaborating from across
these boundaries? Can we learn from and therefore generalize these policies from the
interlinguistic and multi-cultural negotiations that take place in multi-cultural societies?
Among other topics we anticipate that authors and participants will be interested in one or
more of the following topics:







</p>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>Design principles of cross-lingual/cultural ontologies.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-2">
        <title>Cross-lingual/cultural semantic annotation.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-3">
        <title>Cross-lingual/cultural information extraction.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-4">
        <title>Cross-lingual/cultural frameworks, workbenches or platforms.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-5">
        <title>Cross-lingual/cultural applications.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-6">
        <title>Cross-lingual/cultural ontologies for web services</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-7">
        <title>Cross-lingual/cultural policies for collaborative agent interaction.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-8">
        <title>Agent-based cross-lingual annotation, mapping and extraction.</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. LIST OF PROGRAM COMMITTEE MEMBERS</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, IHMC, Pensacola, Florida (confirmed)</title>
        <p>Andrzej Uszok, IHMC, Pensacola, Florida (confirmed)
David W. Embley, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah (confirmed)
Stephen W. Liddle, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah (confirmed)
Yasuhiko Kitamura, Kwansei Gakuin University, Sanda, Japan (confirmed)
Koji Kozaki, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan (confirmed)
Takahira Yamaguchi, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
Youngim Jung, KISTI, Daejon, Korea
Yuri Tijerino, Kwansei Gakuin University, Japan
Tarek Helmy, King Fahd University of Pretroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>