<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Using an Online System with Exemplary Teaching Videos to Support the Professional Development of Prospective Faculty Members</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Esra Yecan</string-name>
          <email>yecan@metu.edu.tr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Middle East Technical University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>06531 Ankara</addr-line>
          <country country="TR">Turkey</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>103</fpage>
      <lpage>108</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The quality of teaching in higher education is an issue which takes the researchers' and policy makers' attention especially after the second half of 1990s. Using online environments is a potential strategy for faculty development on teaching. This project aims to investigate the needs of early career and prospective faculty members' needs on teaching and examine the design, implementation and evaluation of an online environment incorporating discussions and exemplary teaching videos to support prospective faculty members' teaching profession. Findings are expected to provide a framework about using online strategies for faculty development aims.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>faculty development</kwd>
        <kwd>teaching in higher education</kwd>
        <kwd>online support</kwd>
        <kwd>instructional videos</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        members from different disciplines. However the efforts on faculty development are
usually not meeting the needs of the 21st century by using new technologies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Although teaching could be thought as a very social work, it is usually a private
activity for faculty, taking place behind doors [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. All higher educators share a
commitment to knowledge creation in which teaching and research are equally important
aspects, however teaching has not been promoted as well as the other activities of the
faculty [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Since teaching aspects of the higher education is becoming an important issue,
different implications have been started for supporting the professional development of
faculty members in the area of teaching and learning. The higher education institutions
provide either formal qualifications or meetings, symposioms, or inquiry communities in
which the faculty with different backgrounds participate [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. On the
other hand, the formal qualification strategies are sometimes critisized by the faculty [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ],
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. So, more flexible and practice-oriented approaches are suggested by the researchers
instead of the strict and theory-based applications. Effective professional development
should be continuing, active, social, and related to practice [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Online technologies can be effective ways of distributing faculty development activities
by providing contextualized teaching cases and communication between the faculty
members from different disciplines These environments grow collective “knowledge”,
or “practice” by incorporating the interaction between the members. Moreover, these
online environments provide flexibility in access for the members.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Research Questions and Purpose of the Study</title>
      <p>The purpose of this study is two-dimensional which aims to present the big picture of
early career faculty members’ needs on teaching at Middle East Technical University
(METU) and also evaluate the effectiveness of an online environment designed as a
support to a graduate course offered to improve the prospective faculty members’
professional development on teaching and learning. The aim is to generate outputs in the
forms of knowledge and product. Knowledge is related to the needs analysis and the
systematic approach for design and development of a tool for supporting faculty in their
teaching. Product refers to the tool itself, which aims to bring about improvement in
academics’ professional development on teaching. The following research questions
guided the study:
o What are the early-career faculty members’ opinions, needs, and expectations
about their own teaching?
o What are graduate assistants’ perceptions about the effects of using an online
environment in regards to their teaching profession?
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Ph.D. Project’s Contribution to the Problem Solution</title>
      <p>The attention given to the quality of teaching in higher education has been compelling the
institutions to focus on faculty development programs. Although many higher education
institutions provide formal meetings or inquiry communities for their faculty, these
strategies are sometimes critisized for being not so flexible and practice-oriented. Among
different ways of faculty development efforts, the more flexible, context-oriented, and
practice-based need to be developed to meet the expectations of higher education in 21st
century.</p>
      <p>In this study, online technologies have been thought as effective ways of distributing
faculty development activities by providing contextualized teaching cases and
communication between the faculty members from different disciplines These
environments have the potential to grow collective “knowledge”, or “practice” by
incorporating the interaction between the members. Moreover, the online environments
provide flexibile access for the members.</p>
      <p>The findings of this study will be valuable in two aspects. First of all, it will contribute
to the faculty development efforts on teaching/learning at METU by presenting the needs
of the early-career faculty members and examining an online environment as a support to
a graduate course on teaching in higher education. Considering the increase on
worldwide importance given to teaching and learning in higher education, results would be
helpful for the policy makers in designing faculty development programs especially in
training the graduate assistants as prospective faculty members.</p>
      <p>The second value will be about contributing to the knowledge base. The needs of
early-career and prospective faculty members on teaching and learning will provide an
example from a Turkish university. Besides being a national case, findings will contribute
to the knowledge base on designing faculty development programs on teaching in general.
Effects of using an online environment which incorporates exemplary teaching videos of
relevant and contextualized cases, and knowledge sharing for improving the teaching
profession of prospective faculty members will be examined in the study. Although these
strategies are successfully used in preservice teacher education, effective ways for the
higher education still needs to be investigated. Opinions of prospective faculty members
who didn’t have too much concern on teaching will provide insights about developing the
most effective strategies for faculty development programs. Finally, evaluation of the
online system will provide suggestions for designing online environments for faculty
professional development.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Research Methodology and Preliminary Findings</title>
      <p>The study consists of two phases; while the first phase was done through quantitative
methods, second one use mixed methodology approach. For the first phase, a survey
design was used to explore the needs of the early-career faculty members about teaching.
For the second phase, an online environment was designed as a support to a graduate
course on teaching in higher education based on the needs analysis and course instructors’
opinions. Then, it was evaluated through the course participants’ (namely graduate
assistants) point of view. A mixed methodology approach was chosen, so strategies
derived from both qualitative and quantitative methods have been incorporated.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.1 Phase 1: Surveying the Early-Career and Prospective Faculty about Their Needs</title>
        <p>Phase 1 of the study is descriptive in nature and aims to explore the opinions, needs and,
expectations of the early career faculty about teaching in higher education. Data were
collected during the Fall-2008 semester and have been used as a needs analysis for the
design of the online environment. A survey was developed to collect data about the
teaching and learning related concepts in higher education consisting of three main parts:
demographics, perceptions and needs of teaching and learning processes, and background
on and preferred strategy for support in improving their teaching.</p>
        <p>The survey administered included fifty-three faculty members who had been teaching
for not more than six years and 195 graduate teaching assistants. The intended
participants of the survey were the graduate assistants and the instructors including
assistant professors and lecturers who have less than 12 semesters of teaching experience,
but two associate professors have been surveyed too, since their titles reported as assistant
professor on the department website. Their data have not been excluded, since they had
less than 12 semesters teaching experience. On the other hand, 11 of the assistant
professors and lecturers had more than 12 semester experience, but they have not been
excluded either and grouped as the fourth group of teaching experience.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>4.2 Design and Development of the Online Environment</title>
        <p>A graduate course -Teaching in Higher Education- is provided to improve the graduate
assistants’ teaching profession as prospective faculty members. Based on the aims of the
Ph.D. project, the course was redesigned by adding an online environment to the course
without making a major change in its content, so the online system was used to support
the course objectives. The researcher worked in accordance with the course instructor
while deciding on the types and content of the materials for this aim. Findings of the
needs analysis survey were also taken into consideration.</p>
        <p>The online environment was designed to include three main parts in total; seminar
presentations and supportive materials, exemplary teaching and informative videos, and
discussion.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>4.3 Phase 2: Implementation and Evaluation</title>
        <p>Since the evaluation phase was exploratory in nature, the qualitative method was the
driven approach for the research study. Participant interviews, responses to the
openended questions in weekly surveys and discussion logs were the data sources which
helped to explore the participants’ opinions in-depth. In addition, the research is
supported by quantitative data collection and analysis. Weekly surveys provided
quantitative data about participants’ opinions on each unique online activity.</p>
        <p>23 graduate assistants from 11 different departments of 3 colleges (Engineering, Arts
&amp; Science, Architecture) at METU have been enrolled to the course at the Spring 2009.
All of them participated into data collection for website visits, discussion logs, and
weekly surveys. Then, semi-structured interviews have been conducted with 10
participants at the end of the semester. The aim was to collect data about their general
impressions on using an online environment for learning in general, and the effects of
online materials especially the exemplary teaching and informative videos and online
discussions on their teaching profession.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-4">
        <title>4.4 Preliminary Findings</title>
        <p>Analysis of the survey data on phase 1 revealed early career faculty members’ and
graduate assistants’ perceptions on the importance of and needs about the teaching-related
concepts. Moreover, their previous participation into faculty development activities and
preferences about possible teaching-related faculty development efforts have been
examined. See Table 1 for each group’s top mean scores.
How important are the following issues in your
opinion?</p>
        <p>6. Course design based on determined goals
16. Ability to establish communication with students
11. Facilitating students’ active participation into classes
16. Ability to establish communication with students
11. Facilitating students’ active participation into classes
14. Ethics in teaching/learning</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-5">
        <title>Grad. Assistants</title>
        <p>M SD
3.58 .57
3.58 .59
3.56 .56</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-6">
        <title>Faculty M</title>
        <p>Findings of the first phase gave us the big picture of early-career and prospective faculty
members’ needs and expectations about their teaching. This part of the study has been
used in designing the online environment, as well as contributing to the knowledge base
on teaching in higher education field.</p>
        <p>Although the findings of the second phase are still being examined, it’s expected to
provide insights about technology-enhanced faculty development programs. The Ph.D.
project is aiming to propose a new framework to use online strategies for supporting
faculty development on teaching based on the evaluation of the current online system.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hardy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smith</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Contesting tertiary teaching qualifications: an Australian perspective</article-title>
          .
          <source>Teaching in Higher Education</source>
          .
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>337</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>350</lpage>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Boyer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate</article-title>
          .
          <source>Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching</source>
          , Princeton (
          <year>1990</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Trigwell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shale</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching</article-title>
          .
          <source>Studies in Higher Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>29</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>523</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>536</lpage>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huber</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M. T.:
          <article-title>Balancing Acts: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Academic Careers</article-title>
          . American Association for Higher Education, Washington D.C. (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Diaz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garrett</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kinley</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moore</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.F</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schwartz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kohrman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Faculty development for the 21st century</article-title>
          .
          <source>EDUCAUSE Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>44</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>46</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>55</lpage>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hutchings</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The Advancement of Learning: Building the Teaching Commons</article-title>
          . Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Trowler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cooper</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Teaching and Learning Regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes</article-title>
          .
          <source>Higher Education Research &amp; Development</source>
          ,
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>221</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>240</lpage>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kreber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Controversy and consensus on the scholarship of teaching</article-title>
          .
          <source>Studies in Higher Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>27</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>151</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>167</lpage>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hodgson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Whalley</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Quality, the enhancement of a university teaching and learning and the role of quality officers</article-title>
          .
          <source>Teaching in Higher Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>509</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>513</lpage>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pickering</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Learning about university teaching: reflections on a research study investigating influences for change</article-title>
          .
          <source>Teaching in Higher Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>319</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>335</lpage>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garet</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Porter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Desimone</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Birman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yoon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers</article-title>
          . American Educational Research Journal,
          <volume>38</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>915</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>945</lpage>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12. Wilson,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Berne</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.:
          <article-title>Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development</article-title>
          . In: IranNejad, A.;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pearson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , P.D. (eds.) Review of Research in Education, no.
          <volume>24</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>173</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>209</lpage>
          . Sage Publications, Washington, DC (
          <year>1999</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>