<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>New Features and Many Improvements to Analyze Morphology and Color of Digitalized Plant Organs Are Available in Tomato Analyzer 3.0</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gustavo Rodriguez</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>David Francis</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Esther van der Knaap</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jaymie Strecker</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Itai Njanji</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Josh Thomas</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Atticus Jack</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University/ Ohio Agricultural Research</institution>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, The College of Wooster</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Wooster</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Development Center</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Wooster, Ohio 44691</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p> Tomato Analyzer measures morphological and color attributes via image analysis in an objective, highthroughput, and semiautomatic manner. This software allows for reproducible quantification of phenotypic data that previously were done by hand or visual analysis. The new version has improved the accuracy of all measurements and reduced the need to make timeconsuming manual adjustments. In this paper new morphological and color attributes available in Tomato Analyzer 3.0 as well as how the color test module was made more user-friendly are described.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The species in the plant kingdom are characterized by a
great diversity in color, shapes and size displayed in
organs such as leaves, flowers, and fruits. Even within a
particular species the individuals also can be distinguished
by the morphology and color displayed in those organs.
Biologists trying to understand the genetic and molecular
basis for this variation need to measure morphological and
color attributes in an objective and reproducible way. Most
of this type of phenotypic analysis consists of
timeconsuming manual measurements or subjective visual
scoring of characteristics that reduce the success of
identifying genomic regions or physiological causes
underlying this variation.</p>
      <p>
        Tomato Analyzer (TA) is a software program designed to
collect objective data from digital images obtained from
plant organs
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">(Brewer et al, 2006)</xref>
        . Many of these data are
nearly impossible to quantify manually, such as angles at
the distal and proximal ends of the organs or the variation
for color in their surfaces. Briefly, the software recognizes
the objects (fruits, leaves or seed) in digitalized images and
from the detected boundaries in each object is able to
obtain more than 35 morphological attributes. The pixels
inside the boundaries recognized by the software are used
to translate color data from the RGB system into the
L*a*b* universal color space which is able to approximate
human visual perception
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Darrigues et al, 2008)</xref>
        . Moreover,
TA combines controlled vocabulary consistent with terms
present in trait ontology databases and mathematical
descriptors for each shape and color attribute. Even though
the application was specifically developed to analyze
tomato fruit, this software can be applied to analyze fruit of
other species and other plant organs such as seeds, flowers,
and leaves.
      </p>
      <p>This paper describes how morphological and color analysis
of plant organs can be precisely done using Tomato
Analyzer. Lastly, some possible applications of Color Test
in Tomato Analyzer 3.0 are discussed.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>1. Morphological Analysis of Plant Organs Using</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Tomato Analyzer</title>
      <p>Tomato Analyzer can do a high-throughput analysis of
morphological traits in images obtained from plant organs.
Moreover, the data obtained are unbiased compared to
those manually measured by different researchers or using
different instruments. This impartiality allows the
reproducibility of the experiments as well as the
compilation and analysis of data obtained from
experiments conducted in several environments and years.
To date, most of the morphological classifications in plants
were made based on eyeball observations. Instead,
attributes of TA can be used to objectively classify plant
organs into various morphological categories.</p>
      <p>Tomato Analyzer 2.0 has been a valuable and effective tool
to indentify and confirm genomic regions that control
tomato fruit shape as well as performing in-depth analyses
of the effect of key fruit shape genes on plant morphology.
It was possible due to color of tomato fruits are contrasting
enough with a black background used in the scanned
images. However, the software was unable to detect other
darker fruits or leaves.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>1.1 Workflow for Morphological Analysis</title>
      <p>



</p>
      <p>Scan plant organs against a black background to
eliminate shadows.</p>
      <p>Open the image in TA, select the attributes to
measure, tell TA to analyze the image.</p>
      <p>TA separates objects from background. It does this by
looking at a histogram of luminance for the image and
finding the separation point (area of low histogram
values) between the foreground (lighter colors) and
the background (darker colors). It then finds
contiguous areas of foreground pixels (the objects)
and calculates the boundaries around them.</p>
      <p>Resulting data appears in a spreadsheet panel in TA
(screenshot) and can be exported as .csv file.</p>
      <p>Some measurements can be manually adjusted.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>1.2 New Features and Attributes for Morphological</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Analysis in Tomato Analyzer 3.0</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>1.2.1 Reading TIFF images</title>
      <p>The previous version of Tomato Analyzer read only JPEG
(.jpg) files but this new version can open both JPEG (.jpg)
and TIFF (.tif) files. TIFF files are recommended because
they preserve the image as it was originally scanned. JPEG
images alter some of the colors in the image, reducing the
accuracy of object boundary detection and color analysis.
For example, this new feature has improved the boundary
detection in dark green leaves and cucumber fruits. This
improves the accuracy of all measurements and reduces
the need to make time-consuming manual adjustments.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>1.2.2 Length, width and fruit shape index attributes in curved fruits.</title>
      <p>One of the most important features to analyze fruit shape
in tomato is the fruit shape index (defined as the ratio
between the width and the height of the fruits). When the
tomato fruit or other type of fruits as cucumber is curved,
the values for this index do not represent the actual value,
they are underestimated. A new measurement, named
curved height, was added in the new version of Tomato
Analyzer (Figure 1). This attribute allows an accurate
estimation of the length on curved fruits as well as is
possible to be measured a new fruit shape index attribute.
 Width Mid-height (W_mid) – The width measured at ½
of the fruit’s height.
 Maximum Width (W) – The maximum horizontal
distance of the fruit.
 Height Mid-width (H_mid) – The height measured at ½
of the fruit’s width.
 Maximum Height (H) – The maximum vertical distance
of the fruit.
 Curved Height (CH) – The height measured along a
curved line through the fruit (passing through the midpoints
of opposing pairs of points on either side of the distal and
proximal points).
 Fruit Shape Index External I (H / W) – The ratio of the
Maximum Height to Maximum Width.
 Fruit Shape Index External II (H_mid / W_mid) – The
ratio of Height Mid-width to Width Mid-height
 Curved Fruit Shape Index (CH / CW) – The ratio of
Curved Height to the width of the fruit at mid-curved-height,
as measured perpendicular to the curved height line.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>1.2.3 Increased number of morphometric points</title>
      <p>
        To measure shape without selecting individual attributes,
TA offers a morphometric or geometric analysis of each
object. This function finds points along the boundary of
each tomato slice in the loaded image. Statistical tools such
as Principal Component Analyses can be used to analyze
the points in the exported data and it has been used to
identifying tomato genome regions that control fruit
morphology
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Gonzalo et al, 2009)</xref>
        . The distal and proximal
ends are used as landmark points for every object (Figure
2). The number of points measured along the boundary is
defined by the user and ranges from 4 to 200 in this new
version of TA. The first morphometric point (1x, 1y) is
always the proximal end point. The origin (0,0) of the
coordinate system is located in the upper left corner of the
rectangle defined by the Maximum Width and the
Maximum Height.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>2. Color Analysis of Plant Organs Using Tomato</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>Analyzer</title>
      <p>Color is an important quality attribute in horticultural and
floricultural crops defined by particular genes. However,
color changes in plant organs also are indicators of biotic
or abiotic stresses. The genetic bases for color attributes as
well as factors affecting plant health would be better
understood if computer-based analysis of digital images is
applied instead of their subjective characterization. The
Color Test module in Tomato Analyzer (TACT) is able of
collecting and analyzing color parameters in an efficient,
accurate and high-throughput manner from scanned
images that contain plant organs. However, the scanner
needs to be calibrated if the user intends to translate RGB
values to L*, a* and b* parameters. This is because
scanners may change in accuracy and how they capture the
color scheme over time. Moreover, scanners differ in how
well they capture color information.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-12">
      <title>2.1 Workflow for Color Analysis</title>
      <p>


</p>
      <p>Scan a color checker. Open the image in TA and
perform a color calibration.</p>
      <p>Scan objects and open the image in TA, as you would
for morphological analysis.</p>
      <p>Select the color attributes to measure, and tell TA to
perform color analysis.</p>
      <p>Resulting data appears in the spreadsheet panel, as in
morphological analysis.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-13">
      <title>2.2 New Features and Attributes for Color Analysis in</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-14">
      <title>Tomato Analyzer 3.0</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-15">
      <title>2.2.1 Color Attributes Visualized in real time</title>
      <p>The most important improvement related to the color test
module in this new version of TA is that the results are
shown in the real time on the screen shot of the software
(Figure 3). In the previous version, the results only could
be visualized in .csv files after the analysis was done.
The user should chose a color checker with a black or very
dark background based on the broad range of colors
observed in the object of interest (Figure 4). Color checkers
can be purchased custom made or standard.</p>
      <p>After the color checker was scanned should be opened and
analyzed in TA. The software recognizes each tile as an
object. Then, the user needs to enter the actual L*,a*,b*
values for each tile in the color checker, as provided by the
manufacturer (Figure 4). TA uses the actual and observed
L*, a*, and b* values to calculate the linear regression.
After that, the color module is calibrated.


</p>
      <p>Average color values. The values displayed are:
Average Red, Average Green, Average Blue, Average
Luminosity, Average L* Value, Average a* Value,
Average b* Value, Average Hue, Average Chroma.
These average values are calculated taking account all
pixel within the object.</p>
      <p>L*, hue, chroma distributions. These measurements
provide histogram data for L*, hue, and chroma. The
data appear in the tabs called L* Distributions, Hue
Distributions, and Chroma Distributions, respectively.
Each column shows the fraction of the object whose
color falls within a certain range. For example, if the
L[40..50) column in L* Distributions has the value
0.3, then 30% of the fruit has L* between 40
(inclusive) and 50 (exclusive).</p>
      <p>
        Set custom color parameters. Based on the L*, hue,
chroma distributions, the user can define custom
ranges of L*, hue, chroma, or a combination of the
three. The User-Defined Color Ranges dialog appears
as shown in Figure 5. The user can define up to 6
combinations of color ranges. In the example in
Figure 5, Parameter 1 includes all colors where the
hue is between 30 (inclusive) and 45 (exclusive); L*
and chroma may be anything. Parameter 2 includes all
colors where the L* is between 0 and 30 and the hue is
between 0 and 90; the chroma may be anything. The
data will appear in the data window tab called Custom
Color Parameters.
The Color Test module in Tomato Analyzer 3.0 is able to
define the average for several color attributes inside the
boundaries of a plant organ as well as the proportion of six
different user-defined color parameters. This new feature
can be useful to study pattern of color variation in some
plant organ such as petals or leaves. In the plants, soil
nutritional deficiencies, pesticides toxicities and even the
severity of pathogen attacks affect the color pattern on
some plant organ. For example, it has been demonstrated
that the estimation of severity in a specific corn disease is
highly affected by the rater experience when they directly
estimate percentage of diseased leaf area and even more
when they use a 0 to 9 ordinal rate scale
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Poland and
Nelson 2011)</xref>
        . With TACT you can define a color range for
the diseased portion and calculate the percentage of the leaf
having that color. Thus, different researchers will get
exactly the same results because they won’t be interpreting
the colors or the ratings differently. Therefore, Tomato
Analyzer software would become in a powerful tool for
this type of studies.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-16">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This project was funded by the National Science
Foundation DBI 0227541 to Esther van der Knaap</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brewer M.T.; Lang L.; Fujimura</surname>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dujmovic</surname>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gray</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; and
          <string-name>
            <surname>van der Knaap</surname>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2006</year>
          .
          <article-title>Development of a controlled vocabulary and software application to analyze fruit shape variation in tomato and other plant species</article-title>
          .
          <source>Plant Physiology</source>
          <volume>141</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>15</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>25</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Darrigues A.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ; Hall J.; van der Knaap E.; and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Francis D.M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2008</year>
          .
          <article-title>Tomato analyzer-color test: A new tool for efficient digital phenotyping</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science</source>
          <volume>133</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>579</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>586</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gonzalo M.J.; Brewer M.T.; Anderson</surname>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sullivan</surname>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; Gray S.; and
          <string-name>
            <surname>van der Knaap</surname>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2009</year>
          .
          <article-title>Tomato fruit shape analysis using morphometric and morphology attributes implemented in tomato analyzer software program</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science</source>
          <volume>134</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>77</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>87</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Poland J.A.</given-names>
            and
            <surname>Nelson</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>R.J.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <article-title>In the Eye of the Beholder: The Effect of Rater Variability and Different Rating Scales on QTL Mapping</article-title>
          .
          <source>Phytopathology</source>
          <volume>101</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>290</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>298</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>