<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Smart Trade Logistics - Compliance as an Opportunity</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gerwin R. Zomer</string-name>
          <email>gerwin.zomer@tno.nl</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>TNO Mobility &amp; Transport</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>6, van Mourik Broekmanweg, 2600 AA Delft, the Netherlands, tel.:</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>9</fpage>
      <lpage>19</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Facilitation of trade logistics aims at simplification and harmonization of border procedures and related documentation. This is an accelerator for global trade and economic growth and therefore a priority in global trade policy. Trends in logistics and supply chain security and innovations in European customs policy offer great opportunities to increase the efficiency of trade logistics. IT innovations play a crucial role in the realization of these merits. This paper presents a vision on how IT could reap these benefits, with an emphasis on two research projects that specifically address this challenge: CASSANDRA and Extended Single Window.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Supply Chain Security</kwd>
        <kwd>Trade Facilitation</kwd>
        <kwd>Risk Management</kwd>
        <kwd>Supply Chain Visibility</kwd>
        <kwd>System-Based Control</kwd>
        <kwd>Compliance</kwd>
        <kwd>Single Window</kwd>
        <kwd>Green Lanes</kwd>
        <kwd>Trade Logistics</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        International trade is the cornerstone of our globalised economy. Global trade volume has
increased considerably after the Second World War and equals almost $ 32 trillion in
2008 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. Chinese international trade has shown remarkable growth in the last decade.
Between 2001 and 2010, the volume almost six folded from $ 510 billion in 2001 to $
2973 billion in 2010 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Trade facilitation aims at simplification and harmonization of international trade
procedures. Trade facilitation looks at operational improvements at the interface between
business and government and associated transaction costs. Efficient trade facilitation (e.g.
increasing the efficiency of border procedures) can help lower trade transaction costs
hence reduce the margin between domestic and international prices to benefit consumers
and producers alike [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4 ref5">3,4,5</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        According to the OECD, trade transaction costs comprise both direct and indirect
elements. Direct costs include mostly compliance costs related to supplying information
and documents required for the movement of goods or related means of payment, and
charges for trade-related services (e.g. trade insurance, port management). Indirect costs
include procedural delays (time for customs clearance and cargo handling) related to the
market life of products, e.g. spoilage of agricultural products, product cycles for
technology-intensive products. They also include the lack of predictability in the nature,
application or interpretation of regulations, formalities and contracts, and costs of lost
business opportunities, such as due to delays in a given country affecting the whole global
production chain [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Trade facilitation has its intellectual roots in the fields of logistics and supply chain
management. Whereas a narrow definition of trade transaction costs focuses on the ease
and speed of customs procedures, a broader view also includes transportation, distribution
and communication issues.</p>
      <p>
        The last couple of years, this broader view is often referred to as trade and transport
facilitation, where the focus is not only on customs procedures, but also covering the
logistics procedures and documentation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. We call this the facilitation of trade logistics,
meaning the management of international flows of goods, and related documentation and
payments, with a focus on reducing direct and indirect logistical costs through the
simplification/harmonization of procedures and documentation.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2 EU Custom Innovations</title>
      <p>
        The international Customs World has changed its scope drastically in the last years, with
increased attention to safety and security of both people and goods, following the 09/11
terrorist attacks. This trend is established by the USA by introducing measures like CSI,
C-TPAT, the 24-hour-rule and possibly 100% scanning [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. The taken measures should
not lead to hermetically closed borders, with corresponding obstacles for Trade and
Logistics. Instead, parties who have proved to be reliable and transparent can make use of
simplified Customs procedures (e.g. Green Lanes), with more or less free passage of
goods. The World Customs Organization (WCO) has also adapted these developments.
      </p>
      <p>
        In 2005 the WCO has accepted the ‘Framework of Standards to secure and facilitate
global trade’. The implementation of the Framework will not only lead to a safer world
trade regime, but will also launch a new vision on working and cooperating for both
Customs Authorities and trading partners [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        As early as in 2003 the EU has published two Announcements on this matter, one
about simplified and paperless Customs procedures, the other dealing with Customs role
in the integrated management of the external borders. The starting points of these
Announcements are elaborated in the eCustoms Program of the EU [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref9">9,10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        EU Customs services handle nearly 20% of world imports, some 1,545 million tonnes
of sea cargo and 3 million tonnes of air cargo each year. In 2007, EU Customs offices
processed 183 million declarations. In addition to collecting over €12 billion annually, EU
member states administrations (MSAs) have to guard against smuggling, fraud,
environmental contamination and counterfeiting. They protect endangered species, the
area’s cultural heritage, and intellectual capital rights. And they collect trade statistics to
help policymakers detect economic trends. Most of these operations have been
documentand paper-intensive – that is, until the coming of the EU’s eCustoms initiative [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The realization of the eCustoms Program goes hand in hand with the modernization of
the Customs Code. Both are combined into the Multi Annual Strategic Plan (MASP). This
plan contains a list of projects to be realized by the Member States and the European
Commission. The MASP should be completed in 2014. These projects will result in a
number of custom innovations, including Risk Based Approach, Authorised Economic
Operator, System Based Auditing, Single Window and Centralised Clearance.</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1 Integrated Risk Assessment Approach</title>
        <p>The EC wants to develop an integrated risk assessment approach for supply chain security
and trade between Europe and the rest of the world. A risk-based approach in designing
and managing efficient and secure supply chains on the basis of high quality, integral
monitoring data on cargo flows and container integrity is more effective and efficient as
scanning 100% of all incoming containers.</p>
        <p>The National Customs Authority of the first port of call in Europe performs the
security analysis based on the pre-arrival information submitted 24 hours before departure
from the port of origin. The results of this risk assessment are being forwarded to the other
customs authorities in Europe. Because of this procedure, the EC and its Member States
want the risk assessment to be performed according to a common methodology and
approach. Also, this approach should if possible build upon the approach proposed in the
Import Control System of the EU, which is based on using the information from an Entry
Summary Declaration (ENS) and has to be submitted at least 24 hours before departure
from a foreign port to a European Customs authority.</p>
        <p>The research project CASSANDRA has to answer the question how such an integrated
approach for risk assessment would look like and function and whether the ICS system
and ENS procedure provide a good basis for such an integrated risk assessment. An
elaboration of this project is presented later in this paper.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2 Authorized Economic Operator (AEO)</title>
        <p>AEOs will be able to benefit from facilitations for customs controls or simplifications for
customs rules or both, depending on the type of AEO certificate. Recognition would
enable businesses to have their consignments fast-tracked through customs controls (green
lanes), though this claim has to be confirmed in reality by being subject to less
government controls. If a consignment is selected for examination they will receive
priority over non-AEOs. AEOs or authorized carriers, freight forwarders or customs
agents acting on their behalf may opt to use a reduced data set when lodging entry or exit
summary declarations. The Modernised Customs Code also allows the application of
simplified procedures if Authorized Economic Operators perform self-assessments and
take measures to reduce their risks.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>2.3 System Based Auditing (SBA)</title>
        <p>System Based Auditing is an audit methodology designed to check upon the adequacy and
effectiveness of internal controls in both financial and non-financial systems. It covers
process and EDP (Electronic Data Processing) auditing, or IT auditing. This way of
auditing can be integrated with AEO and other certification schemes. In such an approach,
customs audits the implementation of built-in controls by an AEO. Many of these built-in
controls are already certified by other certification schemes (e.g. ISO) within
organisations. The way customs could apply SBA in practice is one of the research
subjects addressed by the Dutch project Extended Single Window.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>2.4 Single Window</title>
        <p>The objective of a Single Window as described in the eCustoms policy is to enable
economic operators to lodge electronically and once only all the information required by
customs and non-customs legislation for EU cross-border movements of goods.</p>
        <p>The eCustoms Single Window concept aims at co-ordination, by customs, of all
crossborder operations and the sharing of related electronic documentation with all border
agencies involved in the movement of goods across community borders. The envisaged
national single windows will be connected to one another and will be supported by the
Single Electronic Access Point (SEAP). The SEAP will allow traders to lodge their
electronic pre-arrival/pre-departure, summary and full customs declarations via one single
interface of their choice which connects their system with all Member States' customs
systems.</p>
        <p>The data is automatically made available to any customs office responsible for the
place at which goods have been, or are to be, presented, irrespective of the Member State
concerned. SEAP can also be used as the entry point managed by one agency which
informs the appropriate agencies, resulting in combined controls. The Single Window
concept obviously offers more opportunity then just electronic documentation with border
agencies, but also offers benefits in the exchange of information between commercial
supply chain partners in order to optimize planning processes.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>2.5 Single European Authorization/Central Clearance</title>
        <p>A Single Authorisation for a simplified procedure provides the possibility of using the
local clearance procedure or the simplified declaration procedure to perform the customs
formalities in the Member State where the economic operator is established, for his
imports/exports wherever they occur in the Community. A transfer of the goods to the
authorised location is possible; subsequently a periodic supplementary declaration is
lodged.</p>
        <p>A number of customs authorities have, on the basis of agreement with each other,
authorised centralised clearance involving simplified entry of goods, which are located in
another Member State, for the customs procedure concerned, notably for inward
processing, customs warehousing and, less frequently, for release for free circulation.
However, these arrangements between Member States are difficult and take a long time to
be implemented, as they require long negotiations and considerable compromise between
Member States, in order to find the best way of overcoming practical and legal
difficulties.</p>
        <p>In 2005, the Customs 2007 Project Group on Single European Authorisation (SEA)
was given a mandate to examine a common approach in order to encourage the use of
Single Authorisations, not only for customs procedures with economic impact and
enduse, but also for simplified procedures at import and at export, including cases in which a
customs procedure with economic impact is followed by release for free circulation. This
is a major facilitation measure as the economic operator can:



concentrate in-house customs expertise at a single location,
deal with only one customs administration and
conduct the formalities etc. in only one language.</p>
        <p>
          As it looks now, realization of Centralised Clearance is far ahead. Some of the issues
to be solved before implementing the concept in practice are related to difficulties to
centralize parallel processes regarding declaration of VAT and duties at import, and
statistical reporting, which are not yet harmonized and show many differences between
EU Member States. As long as these issues are not solved, Centralised Clearance offers
not much added value compared to the bilateral approach of Single Authorisation for
Simplified Procedures. Also other issues regarding distribution of the cost of generating
and distributing the taxes and duties among the Member States, trade restrictions based on
national regulation and cultural differences between Member States seem to slow down
fast implementation of the ambitions formulated in the Modernised Customs Code [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3 IT Solutions to Reap the Benefits of Customs Innovation</title>
      <p>Several existing solution providers offer fragmented, non-interoperable closed system
solutions to comply with requirements for realizing Single Window, System Based
Auditing, and Coordinated Border Management. These include a wide range of supply
chain visibility solutions, customs solutions, port community systems, etc. However, there
is a lack of an integrated interoperable solution framework built on common semantics
and standards, resulting in high costs for businesses to comply with current and future
requirements. Compliance to border crossing procedures and regulation requires
investment in IT solutions for data exchange and data sharing. Such investment is seen by
most trading partners as a cost factor, but there is another side of the coin.</p>
      <p>Advanced IT solutions based on semantic models and open standards, like the WCO
data model, agreements on IDs (UCR, MRN, container ID, etc.), new technologies like
Platform As A Service (cloud computing) and choreography in chains (based on open
source) enable management, storage and processing of large data quantities, whereas
crawling &amp; indexing of data (search technology approach according to Service Oriented
Architecture) support effective integrated risk management approaches.</p>
      <p>Such advanced IT solutions not only considerably reduce the cost of compliance, but
can also offer new business opportunities like centralized clearance. Moreover, the
enhanced supply chain visibility required by customs for their risk based approach can
also offer benefits for supply chain partners. As such, it not only enables them to apply the
concept to compliance aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility (e.g. fair trade
partnership, product safety, logistics carbon footprint analysis, but also bringing
synchromodal hinterland transport services to realization. Thus, it offers ‘three for the
prize of one’!</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4 Research Projects CASSANDRA and Extended Single Window</title>
      <p>Two research projects dealing with IT and customs innovations require special attention:
CASSANDRA and Extended Single Window. These projects develop the proof of
concept for applying semantic web technology for interoperability in freight logistics,
both from technical interoperability as from business interoperability perspective.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.1 CASSANDRA</title>
        <p>CASSANDRA is a large collaborative European research project, co-funded by the
European Commission, running from 2011 until 2014. The project is led by TNO and
includes 28 partners from knowledge institutes, port authorities and port community
systems (from Rotterdam, Bremen, Barcelona and Setubal), terminal operators (e.g.
European Container Terminals), freight forwarders (DHL, Kuehne+Nagel), logistic
service providers, IT and trade solution providers (SAP, IBM, Descartes, Intrasoft, Atos),
standardization bodies (GS1) and consultants.</p>
        <p>
          CASSANDRAs main objective is to enable and facilitate the combination of existing
and new information sources in supply chains for containers into new and better visibility
that allows the assessment of risks by business and government [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>The proposed solution is to combine new tools, hardware, visibility platforms and
other technical solutions in such a way that business and government are enabled to fully
adopt a risk based approach to their operational activities, and in particular to combine
two strategic customs approached: the Risk-based approach with the System-based audit
approach. As such, it is a much more balanced approach then the US driven approach
towards 100% scanning of incoming containers. In its approach, CASSANDRA builds
upon the research findings from previous projects like INTEGRITY and ITAIDE.</p>
        <p>Currently there is a wide range of information systems along the supply chain
collecting and exchanging data and information between different stakeholders (business
and authorities), including tracking and tracing systems, supply chain visibility systems,
customs declaration systems, maritime/port safety systems, Port Community Systems,
supply chain planning/ERP systems, etc. European development of risk assessment
instruments in business is in its infancy and governments have little insight/knowledge on
risk based approaches in business and reliability of these approaches.</p>
        <p>In practical terms CASSANDRA will build the seamless, electronic data ‘pipeline’
linking the seller/consignor and the buyer/consignee, thus unlocking data from the source
for risk assessment purposes. The first idea from such a data pipeline were developed
within INTEGRITY and is being further developed in CASSANDRA. Today, customs
builds its risk assessment mainly on information from Entry Summary Declarations
(ENS), which uses Ship Manifests and Bill of Lading data as the source. In these
documents, the data quality of what cargo is being moved is often poor, freight forwarders
are not interested in what exactly is being shipped in containers and related documents
describe corresponding data fields with ‘said to contain’ a number of boxes, or STC. This
Bill of Lading term is often being used so that the carrier acknowledges the receipt of
stated number of packages but is unaware of the exact nature, quantity, and/or value of
their contents. This is an important issue because, in case of an insurance claim, the
carrier's liability may be limited only to the number of packages (for which a standard
compensation is paid) and not to the total value of the claim. Therefore, both freight
forwarder and ocean carrier have no interest in enhancing the visibility of what is inside
the containers for commercial purposes. However, US Customs insists that reporting
carriers cannot use these words in the description of goods appearing on manifests
submitted under AMS Reporting. CASSANDRA is exploring ways to capture this data in
other ways for customs based risk assessment.</p>
        <p>
          CASSANDRA will facilitate the adoption of a risk based approach in designing and
managing efficient and secure supply chains by business. In addition, CASSANDRA will
facilitate a dialogue between business and government to gain acceptance of the risk
based approach and risk self-assessment by business for supervision by government
agencies. This principle of governments’ piggy backing on businesses’ own risk
assessment, an idea that was developed in ITAIDE will be further developed in
CASSANDRA and is becoming a central theme in a number of long term strategies
among supervision agencies, such as customs and police [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>The project will demonstrate and implement this approach to risk assessment in three
so-called living labs. These are set up around major European tradelanes: Asia – North
West Europe, North Europe – US and North Africa – Southern Europe. In CASSANDRA,
the focus is on the role of freight forwarders in capturing the data for risk assessment.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>4.2 Extended Single Window (ESW)</title>
        <p>Extended Single Window is a Dutch research project co-funded by the Dutch Institute for
Advanced Logistics (DINALOG), led by TNO and runs from 2010 till 2014. The project
involves top researchers from several Dutch universities, Dutch customs, the two Dutch
mainports (Rotterdam and Schiphol Airport) and their community systems Portbase and
Cargonaut, associations for Shippers (EVO), air freight forwarders (ACN) and fruit and
vegetables traders (Frugiventa), and several individual shippers (Flora Holland, Océ,
Arrow, Herbalife, Mattel, Doehler).</p>
        <p>The vision in ESW is to develop an integrated coordinated border management
solution for ports and airports integrating with previous and subsequent procedures for
reliable, secure, and cost effective logistic chains as a prerequisite for the Netherlands to
serve as an excellent gateway to Europe. This coordinated border management, ‘Extended
Single Window’, requires efficient and reliable information for effective joint supply
chain planning by shippers, goods owners, transportation companies, forwarders,
terminals and other logistic service providers and to use this information to meet
government laws and regulations in a cost effective way, e.g. customs and agricultural
procedures and VAT. Re-usability of business data by all government authorities for all
types of goods movements is key in this approach [15].</p>
        <p>The objective of the project is to create reliable, secure, and cost effective logistic
chains throughout the Netherlands supporting all applicable regulations and procedures,
by embedding events for government controls in supply chains based on safeguards in
processes of certified supply chain partners, re-use of business transaction data by
government agencies, and enabling Port or Business Community Systems to behave as
one Information Service Bus with innovative IT. Also in this project, secure logistics
chains requires the availability of reliable information on the contents of containers for
risk assessment performed by Customs, thus finding alternative solutions for the ‘said to
contain’ issue described earlier.</p>
        <p>The aim is to identify which safeguards for government controls need to be defined
and how they can be supported by advanced IT with contribution of business and
government authorities and in close cooperation with various demonstration projects
(single window, Authorized Economic Operator (AEO)/system-based controls,
centralized clearance/Single Authorization for Simplified Procedures). The approach is
expected to lead to a drastic reduction of physical inspections of goods in the mainports
by coordinated planning of government authorities, reliable transport to and from
hinterland hubs, and administrative cost reduction.</p>
        <p>Basic research in advanced information technologies is in Event Driven Architecture
with a Logistic Interoperability Ontology to realize piggy-backing and data pull. The
research objectives are:
</p>
        <p>Design of a smart auditing framework based on Event Driven Architecture and
Service Oriented Architecture for logistics and its governance. This includes
constructing a model for implementing events as safeguards in business processes to
meet government regulations and procedures in line with the MCC and other
applicable (EU) regulations.</p>
        <p>Development of a flexible and scalable Event-Driven Governance and Information
Orchestration (EDGIO) model to ensure that information is available where and when
needed. Such a model captures organizational and technical issues. The EDGIO
model can be used in import/export situations as part of the event driven Information
Service Bus (ISB).</p>
        <p>Construction of a Logistics Interoperability Ontology Framework as the basis for the
Virtual Logistic Data Space. The ontology is used for describing semantics (1) shared
amongst all actors in logistics chains and (2) supporting individual actors in their
business processes and mapping their internal data to the shared concepts. Such an
ontology framework may consists of components defining the semantics of individual
(physical) objects and will build on international developments like the WCO data
model and the UN/CEFACT Core Components. Further research is required into the
fact that it is required to define different ontologies based on common components of
the framework, whereas each ontology defines a specific view on the framework, e.g.
an interoperability ontology, an ontology for an enterprise import/exporting for
instance electronic equipment and for an enterprise importing/exporting toys. Part of
the research will also be on the potential impact on ease of development and
application of ontology constructed of components with distributed maintenance.
Proof of Concept of the Information Service Bus built on the Event Driven
Architecture and the Logistic Interoperability Ontology that will have a distributed
nature in its realization. From a logistic perspective, the Information Service Bus will
act as a virtual logistic data space in which actors share relevant information triggered
by events of their business processes. In this way, the ISB will actively support data
and process integration.</p>
        <p>Evaluation of the feasibility of the aforementioned concepts by (1) constructing
different business models and (2) improving the figures mentioned in section 1.4.3 of
this proposal for the added value to supply chain coordination in the Netherlands. The
business models will illustrate different implementations of the concepts with their
advantages and thresholds for different logistic actors.</p>
        <p>Exploration of the innovation potential of the Information Service Bus and the Virtual
Logistic Data Space in terms of audit process redesign and an evaluation framework
based on explicit control effectiveness and costs criteria.</p>
        <p>In contrast to CASSANDRA, the focus in Extended Single Window is on the role of
shippers and consignees in capturing the data for risk assessment.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5 Conclusion</title>
      <p>IT and customs innovations offer not just an opportunity to considerably reduce the cost
of compliance to border procedures, but also enable new custom facilities and related
business opportunities like centralized clearance. Moreover, these solutions can also
provide the enhanced supply chain visibility required by customs for their risk based
approach, which can also be used by other supply chain partners. As such, compliance is
no longer seen as a cost, but as an opportunity.</p>
      <p>In order to reap these benefits, research projects like CASSANDRA and Extended
Single Window are necessary to develop the prototype solutions and proof of concept,
demonstrate them in practice along different trade lanes, work out the business case and
business model considerations and prepare for wide scale deployment. In addition, these
projects will address several other related research questions, for instance regarding the
benefit logic and business case of these concepts.
15. Zomer, G., et al. (2010), Extended Single Window - Information gateway to Europe: New
information and governance models in international trade &amp; logistics, Final Proposal, Delft.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>WTO</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ), PRESS/554: WORLD TRADE
          <year>2008</year>
          ,
          <article-title>PROSPECTS FOR 2009 - WTO sees 9% global trade decline in 2009 as recession strikes</article-title>
          ,
          <year>March 2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2. PRC National Bureau of Statistics (
          <year>2011</year>
          ),
          <article-title>China's Trade with</article-title>
          the World,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>APEC</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004a</year>
          ), 'Trade Facilitation and Trade Liberalisation: From Shanghai to Bogor', APEC Economic Committee, APEC: Singapore.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hummels</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          ),
          <article-title>'Time as a Trade Barrier'</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Source: (accessed 24 February</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          ) http://www.mgmt.purdue.edu/faculty/hummelsd/research/time3b.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>OECD</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ), 'Looking Beyond Tariffs:
          <article-title>The Role of Non-Tariff Barriers in World Trade'</article-title>
          ,
          <source>OECD Trade Directorate</source>
          , Paris.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>OECD</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ), '
          <article-title>The Economic Impact of Trade Facilitation'</article-title>
          ,
          <source>OECD Trade Directorate</source>
          , Paris: (TD/TC/WP/(
          <year>2006</year>
          )21/FINAL).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>WorldBank</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ), Connecting to Compete 2010 - Trade Logistics in the Global Economy,
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Verheijen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ), Trends in Customs, paper.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>European</given-names>
            <surname>Commission</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ), 'Customs Blueprints: Pathways to modern Customs',
          <source>Luxembourg: Office of the Publications of the European Communities</source>
          ,
          <year>2007</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>European Commission</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ), '
          <article-title>Electronic Customs Multi-Annual Strategic Plan: 2007 Yearly Revision</article-title>
          ,
          <source>TAXUD/477/2004 - Rev. 8 EN, Number</source>
          <volume>3</volume>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>“</given-names>
            <surname>Vision</surname>
          </string-name>
          and Objectives of Electronic Customs', Brussels: European Commission,
          <year>2007</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11. IBM,
          <article-title>Implementing e-Customs in Europe: An IBM point of view</article-title>
          ,
          <source>IBM Corporation</source>
          ,
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dijk</surname>
          </string-name>
          , van S., “
          <article-title>Single European Authorisation en Centralised Clearance: succes of mislukking?”, Master scriptie Europese Fiscale Studies</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2007</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zomer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al. (
          <year>2009</year>
          ),
          <article-title>CASSANDRA Common Assesment and analysis of risk in global supply chains</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Description of Work</source>
          , Delft.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          et al. (
          <year>2010</year>
          ),
          <article-title>Accelerating global supply chains with IT-innovations</article-title>
          ,
          <source>ITAIDE tools and methods</source>
          ,
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>