=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=None
|storemode=property
|title=None
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-820/DemoProceedingsIntroductions.pdf
|volume=Vol-820
}}
==None==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-820/DemoProceedingsIntroductions.pdf
Business
Process
Modeling
(BPM)
2011
Demo
Track
August
28th
-‐
September
2nd
2011,
Clermont-‐Ferrand,
France
Editors:
Heiko
Ludwig,
Hajo
Reijers
Introduction
The
BPM
2011
Demo
Track
provides
interesting
insights
into
recent
developments
in
systems
for
business
process
modeling
and
management
and
in
application
of
process
management
technology
in
practice.
The
quality
and
the
diversity
of
the
accepted
papers
reflect
the
maturity
and
the
increasing
significance
of
the
academic
field
and
its
adoption
into
organizational
IT
environments.
The
Demo
Track
accepted
a
total
of
12
demonstrations
to
be
showcased
at
the
conference.
Of
those
demonstrations
6
demos
are
accompanied
by
demo
paper
describing
its
background,
published
in
these
Demo
Proceedings.
The
other
6
demos
are
described
by
a
brief
abstract
in
these
Demo
Track
Proceedings.
A
Demo
Program
Committee
selected
the
demos
from
the
submissions.
We
thank
the
program
committee
for
the
diligent
work
and
the
Organizing
Committee
of
BPM
to
back
this
Demo
Track
organizationally.
Foremost,
though,
we
thank
the
demo
authors
for
their
efforts
to
submit
demo
descriptions
and
videos
to
our
submission
process.
Heiko
Ludwig
and
Hajo
Reijers
BPM
2011
Demo
Chairs
Demo
Track
Program
Committee
Anuradha
Bhamidipaty,
IBM
Research
,
India
Jyoti
Bhat,
Infosys
,
India
Christoph
Bussler
,Saba
Software
,
United
States
Gero
Decker,
Signavio
,
Germany
Massimiliano
de
Leoni,
University
of
Roma
-‐
Sapienza
,
Italy
Marcelo
Fantinato,
Universidade
de
Sao
Paolo
,
Brazil
Luciano
García-‐Bañuelos,
University
of
Tartu
,
Estonia
Christian
G unther
Fluxicon,
Netherlands
Dimka
Karastoyanova,
Stuttgart
University
,
Germany
Sandy
Kemsley,
Kemsley
Design
,
Canada
Rania
Khalaf,
IBM
T.J.
Watson
Research
Center
,
United
States
Marcello
La
Rosa,
Queensland
University
of
Technology
,
Australia
Niels
Lohmann,
University
of
Rostock
,
Germany
Antonio
Rito
Silva,
INESC/IST
Technical
University
of
Lisbon
,
Portugal
Nick
Russell,
Carba-‐Tec
Pty
Ltd,
Australia
Stefanie
Rinderle-‐Ma,
University
of
Vienna
,
Austria
Minseok
Song
Ulsan,
National
Institute
of
Science
and
Technology
,
South
Korea
Boudewijn
van
Dongen,
Eindhoven
University
of
Technology
,
Netherlands
Pieter
Van
Gorp,
Eindhoven
University
of
Technology
,
Netherlands
Barbara
Weber,
Innsbruck
University
,
Austria
Matthias
Weidlich,
Hasso
Plattner
Institut
,
Germany
Moe
Wynn,
Queensland
University
of
Technology
,
Australia
List
of
Demos
1 Tao
Jin,
Jianmin
Wang
and
Lijie
Wen
(Demo
Paper)
Efficiently
Querying
Business
Process
Models
with
BeehiveZ
2 Sherif
Sakr,
Emilian
Pascalau,
Ahmed
Awad
and
Mathias
Weske
(Demo
Paper)
BPModelMasher:
Manage
Your
Process
Variants
Effectively
3 Michael
Westergaard
and
Fabrizio
Maria
Maggi
(Demo
Paper)
Declare:
A
Tool
Suite
for
Declarative
Workflow
Modeling
and
Enactment
4 Ronny
Mans,
Nick
Russell
and
Wil
Van
Der
Aalst
(Demo
Paper)
Supporting
Healthcare
Processes
with
YAWL4Healthcare
5 Poppe
Erik,
Brown
Ross,
Johnson
Daniel
and
Recker
Jan
(Demo
Paper)
A
Prototype
Augmented
Reality
Collaborative
Process
Modelling
Tool
6 Andrea
Marrella,
Massimo
Mecella,
Alessandro
Russo,
Arthur
Ter
Hofstede
and
Sebastian
Sardina
(Demo
Paper)
Making
YAWL
and
SmartPM
Interoperate:
Managing
Highly
Dynamic
Processes
by
Exploiting
Automatic
Adaptation
Features
7 Terry
Heath,
Roman
Vaculin
and
Richard
Hull
Barcelona:
A
design
&
runtime
environment
for
modeling
and
execution
of
artifact-‐
centric
business
processes
8
Thomas
Burkhart,
Dirk
Werth
and
Peter
Loos
Collaborative
Process
Assistant
-‐
An
introduction
9 Antonio
Bucchiarone,
Stefan
Foll,
Klaus
Herrmann,
Marco
Pistore
and
Heorhi
Raik
Adaptable
Pervasive
Flows:
Towards
a
More
Intelligent
Environment
(Demo
proposal
&
paper)
10 Christian
Janiesch,
Martin
Matzner
and
Oliver
Müller
Slipstream:
A
BAM
Proof
of
Concept
using
Standard
Software
(Demo
proposal
&
paper)
11 Philippe
Baumann
Ontomantics
overview
12 Ingo
Weber,
Hye-‐Young
Paik
and
Boualem
Benatallah
End-‐User
Focused
Service
Composition
with
FormSys
Process
Designer
Demo
Papers
1 Tao Jin, Jianmin Wang and Lijie Wen (Demo Paper)
Efficiently Querying Business Process Models with BeehiveZ
2 Sherif Sakr, Emilian Pascalau, Ahmed Awad and Mathias Weske (Demo Paper)
BPModelMasher: Manage Your Process Variants Effectively
3 Michael Westergaard and Fabrizio Maria Maggi (Demo Paper)
Declare: A Tool Suite for Declarative Workflow Modeling and Enactment
4 Ronny Mans, Nick Russell and Wil Van Der Aalst (Demo Paper)
Supporting Healthcare Processes with YAWL4Healthcare
5 Poppe Erik, Brown Ross, Johnson Daniel and Recker Jan (Demo Paper)
A Prototype Augmented Reality Collaborative Process Modelling Tool
6 Andrea Marrella, Massimo Mecella, Alessandro Russo, Arthur Ter Hofstede and
Sebastian Sardina (Demo Paper)
Making YAWL and SmartPM Interoperate: Managing Highly Dynamic Processes by
Exploiting Automatic Adaptation Features
Demo
Abstracts
Demo
7
Terry
Heath,
Roman
Vaculin
and
Richard
Hull
Barcelona:
A
design
&
runtime
environment
for
modeling
and
execution
of
artifact-‐centric
business
processes
A
promising
approach
to
managing
business
operations
is
based
on
business
artifacts,
a.k.a.
business
entities
(with
lifecycles).
These
are
key
conceptual
entities
that
are
central
to
guiding
the
operations
of
a
business,
and
whose
content
changes
as
they
move
through
those
operations.
In
the
artifact-‐
centric
approach
the
main
focus
is
on
identifying
and
defining
the
key
business
artifacts
(for
example,
a
purchase
order
in
an
ordering
system)
and
modeling
the
business
process
as
interactions
of
these
key
business
artifacts.
Fundamentally,
an
artifact
type
includes
both
an
information
model
that
captures,
in
either
materialized
or
virtual
form,
all
of
the
business-‐relevant
data
about
entities
of
that
type,
and
a
lifecycle
model,
that
specifies
the
possible
ways
an
entity
of
that
type
might
progress
through
the
business
by
responding
to
events
and
invoking
services,
including
human
activities.
Intuitively,
an
artifact
instance
of
a
particular
type
is
a
complex
data
entity
which
is
identified
by
a
unique
identifier,
and
which
can
evolve
over
time,
i.e.,
some
values
of
its
attributes
may
be
modified.
The
particular
evolutions
of
the
artifact
instance
over
time
are
governed
by
the
lifecycle
of
the
artifact
type.
The
goal
of
this
demonstration
is
to
present
the
Barcelona
SW
environment
for
modeling
and
execution
of
artifact-‐centric
business
processes.
Barcelona
environment
has
three
essential
components:
(1)
the
Barcelona
server
provides
back-‐end
functionalities
needed
for
both
design
and
execution
of
artifact-‐centric
business
processes;
(2)
the
Barcelona
design
editor
is
a
light-‐weight
web
browser
application
covering
most
aspects
solution
designers
need
when
developing
artifact-‐centric
systems;
(3)
the
Barcelona
default
runtime
GUI
is
a
web
browser
based
tool
intended
for
execution
and
testing
of
artifact
centric
applications.
The
Barcelona
environment
is
fully
model-‐driven
and
is
therefore
extremely
useful
for
rapid
development
and
prototyping.
Specifically,
the
business
operations
model
(BOM)
of
the
actual
artifact-‐centric
system
is
created
by
the
design
editor
component,
and
it
is
used
directly
for
deployment
and
execution
by
the
execution
engine.
Also,
the
runtime
GUI
is
dynamically
rendered
completely
based
fully
on
the
BOM
of
the
particular
artifact-‐
centric
application.
In
the
demonstration
we
will
introduce
all
major
aspects
of
the
Barcelona
environment
and
we
will
illustrate
them
on
modeling
an
example
of
a
real-‐life
project,
the
Fixed-‐
price
contracting
business
process.
Demo
8
Thomas
Burkhart,
Dirk
Werth
and
Peter
Loos
Collaborative
Process
Assistant
-‐
An
introduction
The
Collaborative
Process
Assistant
(CoPA)
represents
a
flexible
process
support
system
tailored
for
Small
and
Medium-‐sized
Enterprises
(SMEs).
Utilizing
the
large
impact
of
e-‐mail
communication
for
today’s
businesses,
CoPA
turns
the
existing
e-‐mail-‐system
into
a
structured
process
man-‐agement
framework.
Each
incoming
e-‐mail
is
autonomously
matched
to
the
corresponding
business
process
and
enhanced
by
proactive
annotations.
These
context-‐sensitive
annotations
include
recommendations
for
the
most
suitable
following
process
steps.
An
underlying,
self-‐adjusting
recommendation
model
ensures
most
appropriate
recommendations
by
observing
the
actual
user
behavior.
Demo
9
Antonio
Bucchiarone,
Stefan
Foll,
Klaus
Herrmann,
Marco
Pistore
and
Heorhi
Raik
Adaptable
Pervasive
Flows:
Towards
a
More
Intelligent
Environment
Adaptable
Pervasive
Flows
(short:
flows)
are
a
novel
workflow-‐based
paradigm
for
the
design
of
pervasive
applications,
where
dynamic
workflows
situated
in
the
real
world
are
able
to
modify
their
execution
in
order
to
adapt
to
changes
in
their
environment.
In
this
paper,
we
present
the
ALLOW
software
framework
we
have
developed
to
manage
the
adaptation
and
distribution
of
pervasive
flows.
We
have
applied
the
framework
to
a
case
study
from
the
domain
of
logistics
to
demonstrate
the
benefits
and
feasibility
of
our
approach
to
handle
highly
complex
and
dynamic
real-‐world
processes.
Demo10
Christian
Janiesch,
Martin
Matzner
and
Oliver
Müller
Slipstream:
A
BAM
Proof
of
Concept
using
Standard
Software
Many
BPM
system
are
lacking
sophisticated
capabilities
to
monitor
and
analyze
log
data.
Business
Activity
Monitoring
(BAM)
or
Process
Mining
tools
instead
are
limited
to
pure
monitoring
and
notification
functions
and
are
not
able
to
actually
take
action
on
a
business
process.
It
would
require
hardwiring
systems
of
these
two
kinds
to
each
other
to
achieve
end-‐to-‐end
insight
to
action.
However,
this
would
make
it
e.g.
difficult
to
extend
the
architecture
to
a
network
of
interacting
BPM
systems.
Against
this
background,
we
propose
to
apply
the
concept
of
Complex
Event
Processing
(CEP)
to
BPM
systems
to
allow
for
monitoring
and
active
control
of
business
processes.
CEP,
in
general,
comprises
a
set
of
techniques
for
making
sense
of
the
behavior
of
a
monitored
system
by
deriving
higher-‐level
knowledge
from
lower-‐level
system
events
in
a
timely
and
online
fashion.
We
present
a
proof
of
concept
in
which
BPM
and
CEP
systems
are
integrated
in
a
closed
monitoring
and
control
loop
through
the
exchange
of
(complex)
events.
Besides
realizing
this
monitoring
and
control
loop,
the
event-‐driven
architecture
offers
a
number
of
further
advantages:
real-‐time
processing,
loose
coupling,
and
scalability.
The
demo
features
a
perfect
order
process
which
as
the
following
tasks:
•
Check
for
order
patterns
•
Check
customer
credit
worthiness
•
Check
product
availability
•
Advise
goods
picking
•
Advise
goods
packing
•
Initiate
shipment
(standard
/
express)
Checks
may
suspend
a
process
until
a
manual
approval
has
been
given.
Reasons
can
include
double
orders,
availability
checks,
etc.
The
shipment
variant
is
based
on
average
execution
times
of
the
preceding
instances
to
stay
within
fictional
SLA.
All
task
runtimes
and
overall
execution
times
are
propagated
to
real-‐time
dashboards.
Demo
11
Philippe
Baumann
Ontomantics
overview
Ontomantics
is
an
innovative
software
publisher
established
in
Orléans
France.
Ontomantics
product
as
a
platform
as
a
service
enables
users
to
automate
complex
business
processes
in
a
seamless
way
without
code.
The
demo
shows
an
overview
of
the
platform
highlighting
technical
differentiators
and
integrated
features
aimed
to
business
process
mapping,
advanced
interfaces,
rule
based
business
logic,
repository
architecture
focusing
on
ease
of
use.
Demo
12
Ingo
Weber,
Hye-‐Young
Paik
and
Boualem
Benatallah
End-‐User
Focused
Service
Composition
with
FormSys
Process
Designer
Using
traditional
methods,
it
is
often
not
cost
effective
to
automate
business
processes
which
affect
a
small
number
of
people
and/or
change
frequently.
In
this
demonstration,
we
present
an
end-‐user
focused
service
composition
environment
to
allow
users
with
little
technical
knowledge
to
encode
idiosyncratic,
repetitive
business
processes
themselves.
The
novel
tool
enables
end-‐users
to
model
and
deploy
such
processes
as
Web
service
compositions,
from
design
to
execution.
The
approach
is
based
on
end-‐user
friendly
service
naming,
a
graphical
paradigm
for
scripting,
a
targeted
restriction
of
control
flow
expressivity,
and
data
flow
verification
and
optimization.
A
Web-‐based,
end-‐user
focused
service
composition
prototype
has
been
developed,
including
a
transformation
of
process
models
to
WSBPEL
for
execution;
a
demonstration
video
is
available.
Using
the
prototype,
a
proof-‐of-‐
concept
evaluation
is
conducted
with
use
case
processes
from
the
financial
data
analysis
domain.